| 1 | 00:00:00 --> 00:00:10 | ICT: Good morning, folks. I apologize for my tardiness. I was supposed to do |
| 2 | 00:00:10 --> 00:00:15 | this review last link, but my son's had an issue at their home. Had to take care |
| 3 | 00:00:15 --> 00:00:23 | of that, and here we are. So be NASDAQ. All right, so I talked about yesterday |
| 4 | 00:00:23 --> 00:00:28 | in the telegram channel. I started the morning session off with a very modest |
| 5 | 00:00:28 --> 00:00:33 | bullish bias, and I'll explain what that meant. And for the folks that are brand |
| 6 | 00:00:33 --> 00:00:38 | new or just simply just don't understand what it is I'm referring to, I started |
| 7 | 00:00:38 --> 00:00:44 | the morning session off very, very early with an annotation posting an interest |
| 8 | 00:00:44 --> 00:00:53 | in the 20,004 30 level, which is this low here. This was yesterday's low. It |
| 9 | 00:00:53 --> 00:00:58 | was trading in that direction. Okay, what I wanted to see it do was go up |
| 10 | 00:00:58 --> 00:01:05 | into the 21,004 53.75, level. And I told everybody these levels here. I went |
| 11 | 00:01:05 --> 00:01:10 | through the charts from daily down to one hour, 15 minute, five minute, one |
| 12 | 00:01:10 --> 00:01:14 | minute chart. And what I wanted to see was I wanted to see it go up initially |
| 13 | 00:01:14 --> 00:01:18 | and then gravitate down towards this low. That was a whole premise. The first |
| 14 | 00:01:18 --> 00:01:23 | post I gave yesterday in telegram channel was this level here, which was |
| 15 | 00:01:23 --> 00:01:30 | this low. So obviously you can see the market did, in fact, try to work towards |
| 16 | 00:01:30 --> 00:01:35 | that level, but it failed to get to its old low. I don't think we're done okay. |
| 17 | 00:01:35 --> 00:01:40 | I think that it's still viable. It's still likely, but it needs to do, you |
| 18 | 00:01:40 --> 00:01:44 | know, short term retrace and consolidations before dimension gets |
| 19 | 00:01:44 --> 00:01:50 | down there and then this low here. Okay, so you're probably thinking, Well, why |
| 20 | 00:01:50 --> 00:01:54 | am I jumping over these two here? Well, because if it's going to go below here |
| 21 | 00:01:54 --> 00:01:58 | and accelerate, why just take these lows out when this one here is your base |
| 22 | 00:02:00 --> 00:02:05 | before all of this rally up. Okay, so we cleared all these relative equal highs |
| 23 | 00:02:05 --> 00:02:13 | out once we were this volume and balance rallied higher. And then you're probably |
| 24 | 00:02:13 --> 00:02:17 | thinking, you just said a volume amounts because it was labeled as kind of like a |
| 25 | 00:02:17 --> 00:02:22 | pseudo volume imbalance. It's a gap, but I use some of the rules for volume |
| 26 | 00:02:22 --> 00:02:27 | imbalances in there. You can see how it was a very challenging area here and |
| 27 | 00:02:27 --> 00:02:31 | right above, like we were looking for, and then it gave up the ghost and broke |
| 28 | 00:02:31 --> 00:02:38 | lower. But I posted these levels in here yesterday, and I'll show you on the 60 |
| 29 | 00:02:38 --> 00:02:45 | minute chart. I'm okay, and that's what it looks like here, and that's where the |
| 30 | 00:02:45 --> 00:02:51 | buy side was initially. And then this inefficiency from here, that low, this |
| 31 | 00:02:51 --> 00:02:56 | candlesticks high, I refined it further as we went lower. So we go into a 15 |
| 32 | 00:02:56 --> 00:03:02 | minute time frame. And then there's the candlesticks low, and then this candle |
| 33 | 00:03:02 --> 00:03:07 | sticks high. That was inefficiency, and see how smooth. That is really, really |
| 34 | 00:03:07 --> 00:03:13 | smooth. And I wanted to see it at the open in here. I wanted to see it go up |
| 35 | 00:03:13 --> 00:03:19 | and unsettle that, make that jagged, and then trade down into the first level I |
| 36 | 00:03:19 --> 00:03:27 | gave yesterday morning, really early, which doesn't appear to show up on this |
| 37 | 00:03:27 --> 00:03:36 | time frame, but basically this level eight there. Okay, you can see we got |
| 38 | 00:03:36 --> 00:03:41 | real close to it. This is simply didn't go up there and take the buy side. Okay, |
| 39 | 00:03:41 --> 00:03:48 | so that's not an incorrect bias, okay. It's an idea to anticipate the daily |
| 40 | 00:03:48 --> 00:03:52 | range forming. So in other words, where it opens, we want to see it trade out, |
| 41 | 00:03:52 --> 00:03:56 | create a Judas and then trade down to the level I gave guidance on at 20,009 |
| 42 | 00:03:57 --> 00:04:00 | 43 I'll drop down to a five minute chart. |
| 43 | 00:04:07 --> 00:04:08 | Okay, and |
| 44 | 00:04:15 --> 00:04:20 | 930 opening price again, I wanted to see it get above this box, which we'll see |
| 45 | 00:04:20 --> 00:04:24 | on the one minute chart. I wanted to see it act as an inversion fair value gap. I |
| 46 | 00:04:24 --> 00:04:29 | want to see it trade above it come back down in respect only the upper half then |
| 47 | 00:04:29 --> 00:04:32 | displace and the next fear value gap after that. I would have used to get |
| 48 | 00:04:32 --> 00:04:39 | long to run into that buy side, then take the long off, then look for a short |
| 49 | 00:04:39 --> 00:04:44 | if it would have broke below first presented fair value gap after taking |
| 50 | 00:04:44 --> 00:04:49 | the buy side. That would have been a very, very easy model setup that I'm |
| 51 | 00:04:49 --> 00:04:54 | trying to employ for 2025 but it just simply wasn't able to do that. Just did |
| 52 | 00:04:54 --> 00:04:58 | not have any kind of interest at all. Don't want to go higher. It just melted. |
| 53 | 00:04:59 --> 00:05:02 | Okay? Just kept going. Lower, dropping down to a limited chart. |
| 54 | 00:05:12 --> 00:05:14 | Here's your new day opening up |
| 55 | 00:05:20 --> 00:05:28 | right and there's your 20,009 43 level. What I had in mind at the beginning of |
| 56 | 00:05:28 --> 00:05:35 | the telegram broadcast yesterday for February 25 2025 All right, so let's get |
| 57 | 00:05:35 --> 00:05:38 | in here and break this down real quick, because I don't want this to be a very |
| 58 | 00:05:38 --> 00:05:44 | long video. So up here is the buy side and where all those smooth highs are. So |
| 59 | 00:05:44 --> 00:05:50 | if we keep going back to the left, it's all of these highs all what I showed on |
| 60 | 00:05:50 --> 00:05:57 | the 15 minute time frame in the one hour chart. So we have the opening price |
| 61 | 00:05:57 --> 00:06:02 | here, right there on that candlestick, and we break down, we create the very |
| 62 | 00:06:02 --> 00:06:06 | first fair value gap, which is this little blue one. And I wanted to see it |
| 63 | 00:06:06 --> 00:06:14 | trade above this inefficiency. I'm using the volume imbalance in here for the low |
| 64 | 00:06:14 --> 00:06:20 | it, and I want to see it trade above it and close outside of it. Now it has to |
| 65 | 00:06:20 --> 00:06:25 | do this after 930 so here's 930 so I want to see a trade above this. That's |
| 66 | 00:06:25 --> 00:06:31 | what I had in mind. I had a modest bullish bias, which was limited to the |
| 67 | 00:06:31 --> 00:06:36 | very thing. I noted these smooth highs, and I said they were suspect they're too |
| 68 | 00:06:36 --> 00:06:40 | smooth. Okay, so if you're a student of mine, you know what that means, that |
| 69 | 00:06:40 --> 00:06:44 | we're likely go up there and make that smooth edge jagged. So that means it's |
| 70 | 00:06:44 --> 00:06:49 | going to do what, go up there, disrupt it. And then what was the other level? I |
| 71 | 00:06:49 --> 00:06:55 | started the day with 20,009 43 Okay, so that's why I emphasize I have a modest |
| 72 | 00:06:55 --> 00:06:59 | bullish bias. And then initially going into the opening, because I wanted to |
| 73 | 00:06:59 --> 00:07:03 | see it go up in these things, just to simply do, look at the posts, folks, I |
| 74 | 00:07:03 --> 00:07:06 | get it, there's going to be people that simply want to take things out of |
| 75 | 00:07:06 --> 00:07:10 | context because they want to sound smart, but they're looking foolish. So |
| 76 | 00:07:10 --> 00:07:13 | the point is, is I wanted to see it trade after 930 I want to see it trade |
| 77 | 00:07:13 --> 00:07:19 | above this inefficiency and act as a foolish and very bad bullish in Persian |
| 78 | 00:07:19 --> 00:07:24 | fair value gap. Tongue twister rallies up, and if it comes back down and |
| 79 | 00:07:24 --> 00:07:29 | supports price and doesn't go back in the lower half of it, then I want to see |
| 80 | 00:07:29 --> 00:07:34 | it make a run on here. But I have to see this inversion fair value gap produce |
| 81 | 00:07:34 --> 00:07:38 | the support structure. Then a small, little one minute inversion fair value |
| 82 | 00:07:38 --> 00:07:42 | gap, then I could have went long there, and that would have been a run into |
| 83 | 00:07:42 --> 00:07:46 | that. So I would have used whatever that little short term Scott would have been |
| 84 | 00:07:46 --> 00:07:50 | to take that exit reverse and then go lower. And then, if it would have went |
| 85 | 00:07:50 --> 00:07:53 | below the first presented fair value gap, I would have added or pyramided |
| 86 | 00:07:53 --> 00:07:58 | another entry there. But as you can see, it just simply did not give that run up |
| 87 | 00:07:58 --> 00:08:05 | there. It just stayed extremely heavy, and is it folded over? Now, this |
| 88 | 00:08:05 --> 00:08:13 | inefficiency, I'm gonna think it's a 15 minute time frame. I didn't label it. |
| 89 | 00:08:13 --> 00:08:17 | This is why you want to label your stuff when you're doing your annotations. |
| 90 | 00:08:17 --> 00:08:21 | Yeah, it's the 15 minute time frame. So this, this inefficiency I had that noted |
| 91 | 00:08:21 --> 00:08:26 | as well. It broke through, it came back up and acted as resistance. But the long |
| 92 | 00:08:26 --> 00:08:34 | and short of it is, we had no interest at all to go up and clear that smooth |
| 93 | 00:08:34 --> 00:08:40 | area of buy side. So I had to eventually just get in line with what the market |
| 94 | 00:08:40 --> 00:08:48 | was doing. And look for shorts. Market trades up into the lower half of that |
| 95 | 00:08:48 --> 00:08:54 | fair value gap. It breaks lower. We have a fair value gap there. And I said, |
| 96 | 00:08:55 --> 00:08:59 | we'll see if it wants to behave as an inversion fair value gap. If it fails to |
| 97 | 00:08:59 --> 00:09:04 | do so, it breaks down below it, then it means the consequent encroachment should |
| 98 | 00:09:04 --> 00:09:12 | be a what a barrier to it. So it's a failure to launch off of this inversion |
| 99 | 00:09:12 --> 00:09:17 | fair value gap. There's your entry. You can go short there. We have a fair value |
| 100 | 00:09:17 --> 00:09:20 | gap here. That's a Sibi trades up to consequent encroachment there, trades up |
| 101 | 00:09:20 --> 00:09:24 | into lower quadrants, off volume imbalance noted. All these things were |
| 102 | 00:09:24 --> 00:09:29 | noted as it was happening, posting it on the chart. I've tried to do yesterday, |
| 103 | 00:09:30 --> 00:09:36 | very little text descriptions, and I let the chart do the talking, because |
| 104 | 00:09:36 --> 00:09:42 | there's a language barrier. Still, for a lot of you that don't know how to, I |
| 105 | 00:09:42 --> 00:09:50 | guess, follow me in English, I'm trying to make it where it's visual. So if I'm |
| 106 | 00:09:50 --> 00:09:55 | showing you a chart and I'm drawing annotations to it, it goes into a rare |
| 107 | 00:09:55 --> 00:09:59 | an area where I don't have to say anything. You know, you know what I'm |
| 108 | 00:09:59 --> 00:10:04 | pointing out. And. Interest in, you know what I'm showing attention to, so that |
| 109 | 00:10:04 --> 00:10:07 | way you can, kind of like follow along, without having to have any language |
| 110 | 00:10:07 --> 00:10:12 | barrier being issued. So volume and balance here trades off hits, it sells |
| 111 | 00:10:12 --> 00:10:16 | off. And then we have one more area in here where I wanted to see this stay |
| 112 | 00:10:16 --> 00:10:20 | open. It did. It broke down. And I said this was the last line of defense, which |
| 113 | 00:10:20 --> 00:10:26 | was this little gap in here, and I wanted to see that basically act as an |
| 114 | 00:10:26 --> 00:10:30 | inversion pay value gap. And initially it showed signs that it was wanting to, |
| 115 | 00:10:30 --> 00:10:33 | it got down in here, and then once we entered back into the upper half of it, |
| 116 | 00:10:33 --> 00:10:36 | that was all she wrote. Okay, so that means it was going to trace back up in, |
| 117 | 00:10:36 --> 00:10:41 | stop me out, which is what it did. And it was in in profit. I took partials |
| 118 | 00:10:41 --> 00:10:46 | along the way, and you're welcome to go and look at the telegram and see how the |
| 119 | 00:10:46 --> 00:10:52 | trade was managed and where the partials were taken. Initially, I took more off |
| 120 | 00:10:52 --> 00:10:58 | in the beginning of the trade because I wasn't comfortable holding the risk that |
| 121 | 00:10:58 --> 00:11:04 | was on the trade, because I was put off by not seeing the relative equal highs |
| 122 | 00:11:04 --> 00:11:09 | taken and all of this banging around in here just made me more reluctant to hold |
| 123 | 00:11:09 --> 00:11:13 | the size. And it wasn't even that big of a trade. But just for me to be able to |
| 124 | 00:11:13 --> 00:11:18 | call it live and manage it live in front of everybody, it's like 80,000 88,000 |
| 125 | 00:11:18 --> 00:11:25 | people in here. Now, I wanted to make sure that you saw me do those types of |
| 126 | 00:11:25 --> 00:11:30 | things, not just simply, you know, I could put a position on 30 contracts, |
| 127 | 00:11:30 --> 00:11:32 | you know, and then walk it down there and be like, Yeah, this is easy. |
| 128 | 00:11:32 --> 00:11:37 | Yesterday was not easy. It has not been easy for the last well, since 2025 |
| 129 | 00:11:38 --> 00:11:42 | started. So I want you to know, as I said on X if anybody's trying to promote |
| 130 | 00:11:42 --> 00:11:46 | the idea that trading right now is very easy, they're liars, okay? And they're |
| 131 | 00:11:46 --> 00:11:49 | just trying to make an image for themselves. I promise you, they're |
| 132 | 00:11:49 --> 00:11:54 | sweating. Everybody's feeling it. It's hard. So you have to be very, very |
| 133 | 00:11:54 --> 00:11:59 | nimble, meaning that you have to be very careful how much risk you're putting on |
| 134 | 00:11:59 --> 00:12:04 | the trade, and you have to be dialed in incredibly tight, because if you don't |
| 135 | 00:12:04 --> 00:12:08 | know what it is that you're trying to do, and you don't know what the market's |
| 136 | 00:12:08 --> 00:12:12 | in a high degree of probability likely to do next, and that's very hard to |
| 137 | 00:12:12 --> 00:12:16 | determine right now, even for me, because there's a great deal |
| 138 | 00:12:16 --> 00:12:21 | manipulation going on, and The volatility is absolutely insane. So that |
| 139 | 00:12:21 --> 00:12:26 | climate, that condition, that environment for trading, makes it |
| 140 | 00:12:26 --> 00:12:30 | extremely difficult. And these young guys that come out there, and they just |
| 141 | 00:12:30 --> 00:12:36 | recently started to learn how to trade, they're letting their initial luck blind |
| 142 | 00:12:36 --> 00:12:39 | them into thinking that they're far better than they really are. And I |
| 143 | 00:12:40 --> 00:12:44 | experienced that too when I was 20 years old. But given enough time these |
| 144 | 00:12:44 --> 00:12:48 | markets, if this stays in this type of environment, it's going to slap people |
| 145 | 00:12:48 --> 00:12:51 | around, and eventually it's going to slap me. I'm going to I'm going to get |
| 146 | 00:12:51 --> 00:12:54 | it wrong in front of you, legitimately get it wrong, and it's okay when it |
| 147 | 00:12:54 --> 00:12:58 | happens. It's going to be okay for you to see it. It's going to be okay for me |
| 148 | 00:12:58 --> 00:13:01 | to endure it, because I'm letting you know in advance that these are very |
| 149 | 00:13:01 --> 00:13:06 | challenging conditions, even for me. So eventually the market did trade back up |
| 150 | 00:13:06 --> 00:13:10 | higher, and we made a lower low than these relative equal lows here, but that |
| 151 | 00:13:10 --> 00:13:15 | was it, and then we'd retrace back all the way in through the afternoon, and |
| 152 | 00:13:15 --> 00:13:24 | let's take a look at what we have going forward. Here's our new day. I Okay, |
| 153 | 00:13:24 --> 00:13:26 | gap, just mark those real quick. |
| 154 | 00:13:38 --> 00:13:47 | And so we have basically ran out a level I was watching before I set to do this |
| 155 | 00:13:47 --> 00:13:52 | recording here. I think we're going to return back into Uh Oh. There it is. Buy |
| 156 | 00:13:52 --> 00:13:58 | side here after they unsettled these, at these lower, smooth lows. That's what I |
| 157 | 00:13:58 --> 00:14:03 | was looking at up here. And it went down. Took that, and then this was the |
| 158 | 00:14:03 --> 00:14:10 | next objective here. And it has done that. I think that it would be, if it |
| 159 | 00:14:10 --> 00:14:14 | doesn't completely fall to bed, return back to yesterday's first presented fair |
| 160 | 00:14:14 --> 00:14:26 | value gap, and then maybe go up into those smooth highs, which are here. So |
| 161 | 00:14:26 --> 00:14:34 | looking at 21,004, 53.75, even trading up there, it is not something that would |
| 162 | 00:14:34 --> 00:14:40 | unsettle the overall bearishness. See all the highs here, high there, here and |
| 163 | 00:14:40 --> 00:14:43 | there. So there's, there's a nice pool of liquidity there in the form of buy |
| 164 | 00:14:43 --> 00:14:48 | stops. So even if it went up there and knock those individuals out and then |
| 165 | 00:14:48 --> 00:14:52 | resume going lower or go higher, that's, that's the benefit of looking at the |
| 166 | 00:14:52 --> 00:14:57 | things I'm teaching. It doesn't require to be correct about bias. It doesn't |
| 167 | 00:14:57 --> 00:15:01 | require that we're looking for logic. Multiple easy, low hanging fruit |
| 168 | 00:15:01 --> 00:15:06 | objectives for liquidity to be tapped into. And if we focus on that and make |
| 169 | 00:15:06 --> 00:15:13 | that our sole purpose in framing setups, it makes the whole aspect of sitting |
| 170 | 00:15:13 --> 00:15:17 | down and hunting setups a lot more fun, because it's not a lot of moving parts |
| 171 | 00:15:17 --> 00:15:21 | to the equation. It's simple, just looking for things that need to be made |
| 172 | 00:15:21 --> 00:15:28 | jagged Okay, and we've done that down here after we've had a series of almost |
| 173 | 00:15:28 --> 00:15:34 | a week of straight down days. So again, going in this morning, I will be looking |
| 174 | 00:15:34 --> 00:15:39 | for some reason to see price go higher until it forms some kind of a contrarian |
| 175 | 00:15:40 --> 00:15:45 | new setup that tells me I'm wrong in that aspect. So then I would actually |
| 176 | 00:15:45 --> 00:15:49 | get in line with the market like it did yesterday. So again, I'm not trying to |
| 177 | 00:15:49 --> 00:15:55 | pick the bottom. I'm just looking for the logical, easy expectation would be, |
| 178 | 00:15:55 --> 00:15:59 | everybody's bearish right now, like everybody wants a short. Everybody has a |
| 179 | 00:15:59 --> 00:16:04 | short on that's my that's my thinking right now. So where's the pain going to |
| 180 | 00:16:04 --> 00:16:08 | be most felt for the individuals that are short and they're going to squeeze |
| 181 | 00:16:08 --> 00:16:12 | on them? It doesn't mean it's going to go up 1000 points. Doesn't mean it's |
| 182 | 00:16:12 --> 00:16:15 | going to go up 500 points. This means that it can go up a couple 100 points, |
| 183 | 00:16:16 --> 00:16:19 | and that's nothing in the grand scheme of things, if we're ultimately going to |
| 184 | 00:16:19 --> 00:16:28 | go down to levels like that low and these lows here, because they're |
| 185 | 00:16:28 --> 00:16:33 | relatively equal, and we're just banging still into this very large trading |
| 186 | 00:16:33 --> 00:16:38 | range. And that range is sloppy. It's not well organized, which makes it, |
| 187 | 00:16:38 --> 00:16:43 | again, very, very challenging to pick the right levels to get in with a very |
| 188 | 00:16:43 --> 00:16:47 | small risk stop loss. And it's just, it's very challenging, and I'm just |
| 189 | 00:16:47 --> 00:16:52 | gonna leave it that I don't want to beat the dead horse. But it really is that |
| 190 | 00:16:52 --> 00:16:59 | that straight and cut forward. It really is that clear and cut and straight |
| 191 | 00:16:59 --> 00:17:03 | forward that it's challenging at this moment. So if you're feeling it, if |
| 192 | 00:17:03 --> 00:17:09 | you've been apprehensive or reluctant to take a trade, great, that's exactly how |
| 193 | 00:17:09 --> 00:17:12 | you should feel right now. Because unless you know what you're doing and |
| 194 | 00:17:12 --> 00:17:16 | you know exactly how your model is to be implemented, chances are you're probably |
| 195 | 00:17:16 --> 00:17:20 | going to end up getting hurt or losing money or going into drawdown simply |
| 196 | 00:17:20 --> 00:17:23 | because you're trying to trade, because there's opportunity, based on the time |
| 197 | 00:17:23 --> 00:17:28 | in the market being open, that is not what a professional mindset trader does. |
| 198 | 00:17:28 --> 00:17:32 | They look for high probabilities with low risk and easy framework where it's |
| 199 | 00:17:32 --> 00:17:35 | just almost like a guarantee that they're right on their direction. It's |
| 200 | 00:17:35 --> 00:17:40 | likely to go this very clear level, and they're weak for their setups, and |
| 201 | 00:17:40 --> 00:17:44 | that's not easy to do right now. So hope you found this insightful. I'll talk to |
| 202 | 00:17:44 --> 00:17:46 | you later on the telegram channel until then, be safe. You. |