Wiki source code of ICT YT - 2024-10-16 - ICT 2024 Mentorship - Lecture 43
Show last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
1 | (% class="hover min" %) | ||
2 | |1 |00:00:40 ~-~-> 00:01:03 |ICT: Good morning, folks, how are you? If you would give me a audio check on | ||
3 | |2 |00:01:03 ~-~-> 00:01:11 |Twitter, I appreciate it. Audio sounds pretty good on my end, so you should be | ||
4 | |3 |00:01:11 ~-~-> 00:01:11 |okay, | ||
5 | |4 |00:01:17 ~-~-> 00:01:19 |right. Here's our opening price. I | ||
6 | |5 |00:01:40 ~-~-> 00:01:45 |I don't have a lot of expectation this morning, but I'll sit with y'all. I was | ||
7 | |6 |00:01:45 ~-~-> 00:01:53 |going to defer a live stream until this afternoon, but I have plans that I | ||
8 | |7 |00:01:53 ~-~-> 00:01:59 |wasn't aware of, according to my wife. Gentlemen, you know how that works, so | ||
9 | |8 |00:01:59 ~-~-> 00:02:03 |that prevents that from happening. So I'll just hang out with you all this | ||
10 | |9 |00:02:03 ~-~-> 00:02:10 |morning till about 1030 and then we'll break again. Got a lot of feedback from | ||
11 | |10 |00:02:10 ~-~-> 00:02:13 |yesterday's lesson. Appreciate that you | ||
12 | |11 |00:02:51 ~-~-> 00:02:53 |Trading view is really lagging. I | ||
13 | |12 |00:03:57 ~-~-> 00:04:05 |just being Quiet. God is fine. I had a couple guys say that they couldn't hear | ||
14 | |13 |00:04:05 ~-~-> 00:04:09 |me yesterday talking as well. So I'm not sure that's You on your end. What? | ||
15 | |14 |00:05:25 ~-~-> 00:05:26 |It's a little too Smooth. I'm | ||
16 | |15 |00:06:44 ~-~-> 00:06:50 |Yes, is a bit of a mess. Take a quick look at down. Whoops, | ||
17 | |16 |00:06:56 ~-~-> 00:07:02 |here's decoupling. It's pretty it's pretty expected, actually, when there's | ||
18 | |17 |00:07:02 ~-~-> 00:07:08 |no news due out in the morning or this morning, rather, see | ||
19 | |18 |00:07:13 ~-~-> 00:07:19 |how they go in different directions. That makes it a lot harder for precision | ||
20 | |19 |00:07:19 ~-~-> 00:07:26 |to be available to you doesn't mean you can't trade. It just means that you're | ||
21 | |20 |00:07:26 ~-~-> 00:07:31 |trading with lower probability. I've done it before, but if you're a new | ||
22 | |21 |00:07:31 ~-~-> 00:07:35 |trader, a new student, it's not something you should be trying to do. | ||
23 | |22 |00:07:36 ~-~-> 00:07:41 |All three of the averages should be moving together. If it's a trading asset | ||
24 | |23 |00:07:41 ~-~-> 00:07:45 |that you're like. For instance, I'm monitoring NASDAQ on the regular. So if | ||
25 | |24 |00:07:45 ~-~-> 00:07:52 |that's my asset class, I want to trade as the indices or stock indices, and the | ||
26 | |25 |00:07:52 ~-~-> 00:07:58 |specific instrument being the NASDAQ, I look for the S, P and the Dow to be | ||
27 | |26 |00:07:58 ~-~-> 00:08:04 |moving in the same direction. If I'm wanting to be long, I want to see | ||
28 | |27 |00:08:04 ~-~-> 00:08:08 |something that's supported the idea for all three of them, bullish. | ||
29 | |28 |00:08:15 ~-~-> 00:08:18 |I'm watching this little cap right in here. I | ||
30 | |29 |00:09:38 ~-~-> 00:09:45 |i like the idea that a proportion of that gap not being treated to ES is | ||
31 | |30 |00:09:45 ~-~-> 00:09:47 |making a lower low | ||
32 | |31 |00:09:57 ~-~-> 00:10:00 |it's come out. There's | ||
33 | |32 |00:10:06 ~-~-> 00:10:09 |your sales side there. I'm not going to label it, because I don't really care so | ||
34 | |33 |00:10:09 ~-~-> 00:10:19 |much about this one. And bow is just a mess. I'm | ||
35 | |34 |00:10:33 ~-~-> 00:10:36 |if it runs for the sell side, it's just going to be one of those instances where | ||
36 | |35 |00:10:37 ~-~-> 00:10:45 |the first presenter pay gap doesn't give you an entry and you remind yourself | ||
37 | |36 |00:10:45 ~-~-> 00:10:50 |that it's decoupling. It means there's the mixed direction on all three | ||
38 | |37 |00:10:50 ~-~-> 00:10:53 |averages down, doing its own thing. | ||
39 | |38 |00:10:59 ~-~-> 00:11:05 |Good, great for journaling. It reinforces the idea of being highly | ||
40 | |39 |00:11:05 ~-~-> 00:11:08 |selective on the days that you want to enter, what a sessions that you want to | ||
41 | |40 |00:11:08 ~-~-> 00:11:13 |enter on you want all the things going for you in your trades, instead of just | ||
42 | |41 |00:11:13 ~-~-> 00:11:18 |looking for any old thing to get me into a trade. That's a 20 year old ICTs | ||
43 | |42 |00:11:19 ~-~-> 00:11:25 |version of trying to trade if it was oversold. That was enough reason. It's | ||
44 | |43 |00:11:25 ~-~-> 00:11:32 |enough reason to get in there. Now I'm watching this blame and balance. I | ||
45 | |44 |00:12:02 ~-~-> 00:12:06 |No the question probably comes up in your mind, is okay, if you're noticing | ||
46 | |45 |00:12:06 ~-~-> 00:12:10 |now, the indices are doing different things. One incy go in one direction, | ||
47 | |46 |00:12:10 ~-~-> 00:12:16 |Heather's doing the other direction. What? What does that mean for me as an | ||
48 | |47 |00:12:16 ~-~-> 00:12:20 |analyst? What does that mean for me as the trader? What does that mean for | ||
49 | |48 |00:12:20 ~-~-> 00:12:26 |action. Where's the actionable ideas on that? Well, you have a choice. You can | ||
50 | |49 |00:12:26 ~-~-> 00:12:30 |sit and wait for the indices during the morning session to either come together | ||
51 | |50 |00:12:31 ~-~-> 00:12:35 |in terms of agreement or they start moving in tandem. Sometimes that happens | ||
52 | |51 |00:12:35 ~-~-> 00:12:39 |in the same session. Sometimes it takes the morning session to sort all that out | ||
53 | |52 |00:12:39 ~-~-> 00:12:44 |and over the lunch hours, then the afternoon becomes a little bit better to | ||
54 | |53 |00:12:44 ~-~-> 00:12:49 |trade, or it can, on the worst case scenario, it can stay decoupled all day | ||
55 | |54 |00:12:50 ~-~-> 00:12:56 |and make very problematic conditions for trading, unless you're really, really | ||
56 | |55 |00:12:56 ~-~-> 00:13:04 |short term and you're just taking the lightest, uh, uh, yeah, the things that | ||
57 | |56 |00:13:04 ~-~-> 00:13:07 |would instigate your ticket and trade the smallest of things to do that, which | ||
58 | |57 |00:13:07 ~-~-> 00:13:12 |I'm not a fan of. I don't teach that anyone should do that. The more things | ||
59 | |58 |00:13:12 ~-~-> 00:13:15 |you have in your in your favor, the better. | ||
60 | |59 |00:13:21 ~-~-> 00:13:26 |But these are actually better. These are better teaching environments, because | ||
61 | |60 |00:13:26 ~-~-> 00:13:30 |nobody wants to talk about these types of things. They want to talk about when | ||
62 | |61 |00:13:30 ~-~-> 00:13:35 |they made money or when it was easy for them, and that's the easy part of | ||
63 | |62 |00:13:35 ~-~-> 00:13:41 |learning, and that's easy part of being a teacher. When it's easy, everything | ||
64 | |63 |00:13:41 ~-~-> 00:13:45 |looks like it's perfect, but when you're met with the realities of what the | ||
65 | |64 |00:13:45 ~-~-> 00:13:49 |market is going to give you, sometimes it's going to give you a curveball where | ||
66 | |65 |00:13:49 ~-~-> 00:13:53 |you're not getting all the indices in agreement. Let's take quick look at down | ||
67 | |66 |00:13:53 ~-~-> 00:14:04 |once more. We don't want to trade that. That's nothing there. It's brilliant. It | ||
68 | |67 |00:14:04 ~-~-> 00:14:10 |looks like cheap bubblegum, all right, so we look at the ES so | ||
69 | |68 |00:14:20 ~-~-> 00:14:22 |far, the only thing it makes sense, even though it's not in agreement with a | ||
70 | |69 |00:14:22 ~-~-> 00:14:26 |agreement with any of the other two indices, NASDAQ still looks okay. And | ||
71 | |70 |00:14:26 ~-~-> 00:14:31 |I'll go over what I mean by that. We've we've been weak. We did not get a return | ||
72 | |71 |00:14:31 ~-~-> 00:14:35 |back into first retentive fair value gap. That's fine. We have bearish order | ||
73 | |72 |00:14:35 ~-~-> 00:14:40 |block trades up into here. Notice the bodies inside this gap, the body stay | ||
74 | |73 |00:14:40 ~-~-> 00:14:45 |ready at consequent encroachment or lower. These are the damage inducing | ||
75 | |74 |00:14:46 ~-~-> 00:14:50 |events where the wicks are allowed to do that type of damage. And then we roll | ||
76 | |75 |00:14:50 ~-~-> 00:14:57 |back down rotation out of the volume imbalance, even with the decoupling. I | ||
77 | |76 |00:14:57 ~-~-> 00:15:01 |would like to still see that cell side deliver so. But then, because it's | ||
78 | |77 |00:15:01 ~-~-> 00:15:07 |mixed, because it's mixed, I would like to see some kind of return back into the | ||
79 | |78 |00:15:07 ~-~-> 00:15:13 |range which is likely to see it come back up in here. That's a scenario to | ||
80 | |79 |00:15:13 ~-~-> 00:15:16 |see how they see it straight down into sell side, explore a little bit lower | ||
81 | |80 |00:15:16 ~-~-> 00:15:21 |than that. And then if it can make its way back up in here, I would look for as | ||
82 | |81 |00:15:21 ~-~-> 00:15:26 |long as the Dow stays basically an unruly brat doing what it wants to do, | ||
83 | |82 |00:15:26 ~-~-> 00:15:33 |and if the NASDAQ shrugs off any weakness as well, back up into here | ||
84 | |83 |00:15:33 ~-~-> 00:15:38 |going into the second half of the am session, that would be something I would | ||
85 | |84 |00:15:38 ~-~-> 00:15:41 |look for. It doesn't mean it's exactly what I'm looking for. I'm looking for | ||
86 | |85 |00:15:41 ~-~-> 00:15:43 |scenario after seeing the sell side deliver like I just did here, | ||
87 | |86 |00:15:52 ~-~-> 00:15:58 |one of the the best things you can do is give yourself permission early on, is to | ||
88 | |87 |00:15:58 ~-~-> 00:16:04 |Let trades pan out when it's highly unlikely for precision to be there, so | ||
89 | |88 |00:16:04 ~-~-> 00:16:09 |we can still see elements to the things I teach. But these are the types of | ||
90 | |89 |00:16:09 ~-~-> 00:16:12 |little things that will probably mess you up. Because you could probably look | ||
91 | |90 |00:16:12 ~-~-> 00:16:16 |at this and say, Okay, I said, he said he liked this fair value gap. So maybe | ||
92 | |91 |00:16:16 ~-~-> 00:16:21 |some of you push the button. If he did, you failed. Because even though it did, | ||
93 | |92 |00:16:21 ~-~-> 00:16:26 |it did deliver. We were looking for sell side. It doesn't mean that you should | ||
94 | |93 |00:16:26 ~-~-> 00:16:29 |have taken that trade, because if you've listened, even though it's done this, | ||
95 | |94 |00:16:30 ~-~-> 00:16:33 |it's not a high probability of trade. That means these are the types of setups | ||
96 | |95 |00:16:33 ~-~-> 00:16:37 |or movements and price action that I'm comfortable sitting on the sideline and | ||
97 | |96 |00:16:37 ~-~-> 00:16:42 |just watching them, paint and tape, read them, watch them, observe them, go over | ||
98 | |97 |00:16:42 ~-~-> 00:16:46 |them with my son, if you sit next to me or send screenshots to him and say, hey, | ||
99 | |98 |00:16:46 ~-~-> 00:16:50 |look, look, take it. Look at this. See what it did here. Not being a | ||
100 | |99 |00:16:50 ~-~-> 00:16:56 |participant in it. These types of scenarios happen all the time, but the | ||
101 | |100 |00:16:56 ~-~-> 00:17:01 |very, very choice setups where you can get in, they're not as frequent as these | ||
102 | |101 |00:17:01 ~-~-> 00:17:05 |are going to be, and that's the problem with inpatient traders, inpatient | ||
103 | |102 |00:17:06 ~-~-> 00:17:10 |undisciplined, without a model, without a protocol or procedure that they | ||
104 | |103 |00:17:10 ~-~-> 00:17:15 |follow, or a high demand on quality setups where everything is in agreement, | ||
105 | |104 |00:17:18 ~-~-> 00:17:24 |See if it's changed anything. I'm still working on one screen, because I want to | ||
106 | |105 |00:17:24 ~-~-> 00:17:28 |again emphasize the importance of look at that so it's going the other | ||
107 | |106 |00:17:30 ~-~-> 00:17:36 |direction. And then, yes, let's take a quick look at that. No real expansion of | ||
108 | |107 |00:17:36 ~-~-> 00:17:40 |the downside, but it still has its cell side right there. So I would manage to | ||
109 | |108 |00:17:40 ~-~-> 00:17:44 |say, let's take a couple things here. Note done, | ||
110 | |109 |00:17:51 ~-~-> 00:17:55 |volume and balance right in here. I'm just going to make it with a rectangle, | ||
111 | |110 |00:17:55 ~-~-> 00:17:57 |if you don't mind, save some time I'm | ||
112 | |111 |00:18:07 ~-~-> 00:18:09 |so again that it has sell side down there as well. I'm | ||
113 | |112 |00:18:23 ~-~-> 00:18:27 |okay, and back into nq, you | ||
114 | |113 |00:18:41 ~-~-> 00:18:50 |can see, rather anemic opening range gap. Again. It just happens that the | ||
115 | |114 |00:18:50 ~-~-> 00:18:56 |first fair value gap forms actually in that same area as well. So we have taken | ||
116 | |115 |00:18:57 ~-~-> 00:19:02 |cell side on a mixed, decoupled am session during the opening range, we | ||
117 | |116 |00:19:02 ~-~-> 00:19:06 |have a couple more minutes still for the first 30 minutes to book. | ||
118 | |117 |00:19:18 ~-~-> 00:19:23 |Now, two scenarios on a morning like this, where the averages are doing | ||
119 | |118 |00:19:23 ~-~-> 00:19:28 |different things. Dow's going up, sorry. NASDAQ, best performer on the downside. | ||
120 | |119 |00:19:29 ~-~-> 00:19:34 |And then you have the ES that is moved a little bit, but it hasn't quite made the | ||
121 | |120 |00:19:34 ~-~-> 00:19:40 |same type of delivery for its sell side down here yet. So it's being like I | ||
122 | |121 |00:19:40 ~-~-> 00:19:44 |said, it's snubbing any weakness, as I was indicating earlier, like I want to | ||
123 | |122 |00:19:44 ~-~-> 00:19:48 |see if it fails to go lower. If it does that, it's going to run for the buy side | ||
124 | |123 |00:19:48 ~-~-> 00:19:54 |here, for ES and maybe explore the orders up in that area there, not that | ||
125 | |124 |00:19:54 ~-~-> 00:19:58 |it needs to know how many orders there are. That's where the the buy side would | ||
126 | |125 |00:19:58 ~-~-> 00:20:03 |be. I'm. These two low, I'm sorry, these two highs with this one being lower than | ||
127 | |126 |00:20:03 ~-~-> 00:20:08 |this one, and then this high over here, back it out a little bit, and you see | ||
128 | |127 |00:20:08 ~-~-> 00:20:17 |these really clean little, almost too perfect in it. So if it fails to go | ||
129 | |128 |00:20:17 ~-~-> 00:20:22 |below the south side, NASDAQ starts to come back up into its range. That would | ||
130 | |129 |00:20:22 ~-~-> 00:20:29 |be where my eye would go to for ES, but it's conditional, so notice I'm saying | ||
131 | |130 |00:20:29 ~-~-> 00:20:33 |these things have to accompany other things. It's not just simply me saying | ||
132 | |131 |00:20:33 ~-~-> 00:20:38 |ES is going there. We'd still have to work out the uncertainty of this cell | ||
133 | |132 |00:20:38 ~-~-> 00:20:46 |side being taken or not in agreement with the NASDAQ returning back up into | ||
134 | |133 |00:20:46 ~-~-> 00:20:50 |its range, that would indicate this could potentially become an inversion | ||
135 | |134 |00:20:50 ~-~-> 00:20:55 |fair value gap, if that is what is likely to see unfold, and that may | ||
136 | |135 |00:20:55 ~-~-> 00:21:00 |support a run back up into and maybe the first delivery to, versus a fair value | ||
137 | |136 |00:21:00 ~-~-> 00:21:04 |gap and back into the opening range gap, which is kind of sharing the same real | ||
138 | |137 |00:21:04 ~-~-> 00:21:08 |estate in terms of price range. Now I'll go back out to river trading hours just | ||
139 | |138 |00:21:08 ~-~-> 00:21:10 |for a moment to show you what I mean by that. | ||
140 | |139 |00:21:16 ~-~-> 00:21:21 |So we have the silent price here yesterday. I'm just going to use it with | ||
141 | |140 |00:21:21 ~-~-> 00:21:28 |the lines, if you don't mind, tape with This. So | ||
142 | |141 |00:21:58 ~-~-> 00:21:59 |in an opening price today I'm | ||
143 | |142 |00:22:10 ~-~-> 00:22:17 |and then we go back out to electronic trading hours. So you can see there's | ||
144 | |143 |00:22:17 ~-~-> 00:22:22 |two, two frames of reference in here we have the first present, the fair value | ||
145 | |144 |00:22:22 ~-~-> 00:22:27 |gap that never got traded to yet, despite being delivered to downside and | ||
146 | |145 |00:22:27 ~-~-> 00:22:31 |sell side, it did not get traded back into here after creating it. So this | ||
147 | |146 |00:22:31 ~-~-> 00:22:35 |candle never made it up there, and no subsequent candle after that made its | ||
148 | |147 |00:22:35 ~-~-> 00:22:41 |way up there. So the the constellation prize was that we could see this fair | ||
149 | |148 |00:22:41 ~-~-> 00:22:48 |value gap forming here, and the bodies were laid down and buried right at the | ||
150 | |149 |00:22:48 ~-~-> 00:22:52 |consequent encroachment of that, that separation between this candlesticks | ||
151 | |150 |00:22:52 ~-~-> 00:22:55 |low, that candlesticks high, and the wicks were permitted to do the damage. | ||
152 | |151 |00:22:57 ~-~-> 00:23:02 |So it's this is just simply returning back into these two consecutive up close | ||
153 | |152 |00:23:02 ~-~-> 00:23:05 |candles, where, because they're two consecutive, I'll close candles, you use | ||
154 | |153 |00:23:05 ~-~-> 00:23:09 |the opening price of the lowest. That's this one right here. That's it. That's | ||
155 | |154 |00:23:09 ~-~-> 00:23:14 |your order block. Or change in a state of delivery where price was delivering | ||
156 | |155 |00:23:14 ~-~-> 00:23:19 |buy side. It means it's moving higher, and then it changes and goes lower. So | ||
157 | |156 |00:23:19 ~-~-> 00:23:22 |change in a state delivery is that opening price, and you can see it going | ||
158 | |157 |00:23:22 ~-~-> 00:23:28 |right there. It returns and trades lower, just for good measure, it turns | ||
159 | |158 |00:23:28 ~-~-> 00:23:33 |right back to this candlesticks low as well. Look at the low of that 20,003 07, | ||
160 | |159 |00:23:33 ~-~-> 00:23:41 |even, and the high comes in 20,307.25 which is a perfect delivery to this. | ||
161 | |160 |00:23:41 ~-~-> 00:23:44 |Candlesticks low, plus one tick per spread. | ||
162 | |161 |00:23:53 ~-~-> 00:24:01 |One more quick look at the Dow. Again, being a brat, doing, doing what it wants | ||
163 | |162 |00:24:01 ~-~-> 00:24:09 |to do. And, yes, okay, let's extend this out a little bit more. See we've already | ||
164 | |163 |00:24:09 ~-~-> 00:24:14 |hit it there. Watch the consequent encroachment of this lick. | ||
165 | |164 |00:24:20 ~-~-> 00:24:24 |Now hit that right there. And in a perfect world, it would roll out of this | ||
166 | |165 |00:24:24 ~-~-> 00:24:31 |and go down and attack itself side liquidity. See how it's very, very | ||
167 | |166 |00:24:31 ~-~-> 00:24:36 |difficult to frame any kind of stop loss in all this, if you're trying to be | ||
168 | |167 |00:24:36 ~-~-> 00:24:41 |short. So that's one of the things that you have to you're just going to have to | ||
169 | |168 |00:24:41 ~-~-> 00:24:46 |accept that there are going to be times where you're not being afforded a very | ||
170 | |169 |00:24:46 ~-~-> 00:24:53 |low risk entry or an entry at all, despite knowing where it might | ||
171 | |170 |00:24:53 ~-~-> 00:24:58 |potentially still trade to and in the beginning, you know, as a student of | ||
172 | |171 |00:24:58 ~-~-> 00:25:03 |price action expressive learning. Me, it's real easy to get caught up in the | ||
173 | |172 |00:25:03 ~-~-> 00:25:06 |frenzy of trying to use something you just learned, especially if you see our | ||
174 | |173 |00:25:06 ~-~-> 00:25:10 |community members that are sharing their immediate, you know, success with | ||
175 | |174 |00:25:10 ~-~-> 00:25:14 |something that they just watched me outline and teach for the first time, or | ||
176 | |175 |00:25:14 ~-~-> 00:25:16 |maybe amplify something that they thought they understood. And now they're | ||
177 | |176 |00:25:16 ~-~-> 00:25:22 |like, Okay, now I have a new a new breath of life and interest around | ||
178 | |177 |00:25:22 ~-~-> 00:25:25 |something I used to like, but I haven't been playing around, playing around with | ||
179 | |178 |00:25:25 ~-~-> 00:25:31 |it too much. And then you see them doing something that makes them profitable, or | ||
180 | |179 |00:25:31 ~-~-> 00:25:37 |shows a profitable endeavor using it. So that means you want to go out there, and | ||
181 | |180 |00:25:37 ~-~-> 00:25:41 |you want to try to do it right away, too, and you'll lose focus and not | ||
182 | |181 |00:25:41 ~-~-> 00:25:46 |recognize the opportunities that are not being afforded to you, because you're | ||
183 | |182 |00:25:46 ~-~-> 00:25:51 |just wanting it to go to a draw on liquidity. And that's not enough. You | ||
184 | |183 |00:25:51 ~-~-> 00:25:57 |have to know that this it's market climate where there's a decoupling, | ||
185 | |184 |00:25:57 ~-~-> 00:26:01 |where the three averages are doing opposite things. They're not doing the | ||
186 | |185 |00:26:01 ~-~-> 00:26:07 |same thing. Okay? So neat little turn back up into the opening price there. | ||
187 | |186 |00:26:08 ~-~-> 00:26:14 |Hammered it perfectly. There's nothing in here. The frame of the entry on. So | ||
188 | |187 |00:26:14 ~-~-> 00:26:17 |anything we're really watching and observing is, does it have the ability | ||
189 | |188 |00:26:17 ~-~-> 00:26:21 |to rotate out of this and attack the sell side? Which is the only thing that | ||
190 | |189 |00:26:21 ~-~-> 00:26:24 |makes sense down here, doesn't mean that it can't go higher. It just means that | ||
191 | |190 |00:26:24 ~-~-> 00:26:28 |if it does, who cares? You wouldn't have been short, because there's nothing in | ||
192 | |191 |00:26:28 ~-~-> 00:26:35 |here to frame it for the risk. There's no way to feel good about taking the | ||
193 | |192 |00:26:35 ~-~-> 00:26:39 |trade, because you have decoupling. So I'm speaking to the folks that are | ||
194 | |193 |00:26:39 ~-~-> 00:26:42 |trading es, by the way, because I have a lot of students saying, You never talk | ||
195 | |194 |00:26:42 ~-~-> 00:26:48 |about es, why don't you like ES? I like the volatility and the price delivery in | ||
196 | |195 |00:26:48 ~-~-> 00:26:53 |nq, because NQ is a little bit more exaggerated. It's only 100 stocks versus | ||
197 | |196 |00:26:53 ~-~-> 00:27:00 |500 stocks that makes its composite index up. So SNP is a little bit slower. | ||
198 | |197 |00:27:00 ~-~-> 00:27:02 |It's a little bit like, | ||
199 | |198 |00:27:08 ~-~-> 00:27:13 |it's kind of cognac. I'm not a drinker, but it's like a cognac, and ES is kind | ||
200 | |199 |00:27:13 ~-~-> 00:27:18 |of like Johnny Walker or Jack Daniels. Okay, you want to get your ass tore up | ||
201 | |200 |00:27:18 ~-~-> 00:27:22 |real quick. You drink the cheap stuff, and you can drink a lot more of it, and | ||
202 | |201 |00:27:22 ~-~-> 00:27:28 |it's fun, it's fast, it's an easy, good time, but if you don't think you're | ||
203 | |202 |00:27:28 ~-~-> 00:27:34 |doing it can wreck you. ES is a little bit more sophisticated. It's a little | ||
204 | |203 |00:27:34 ~-~-> 00:27:44 |bit more well rounded, okay, and the the interest in volatility is my number one | ||
205 | |204 |00:27:44 ~-~-> 00:27:47 |concern for trading, because that's what I want as a trader. I need that | ||
206 | |205 |00:27:47 ~-~-> 00:27:53 |movement, and it's a lot easier to see that movement outlined in NQ versus | ||
207 | |206 |00:27:53 ~-~-> 00:28:03 |something like the the s, p here, I can see, even though the muddied waters of | ||
208 | |207 |00:28:03 ~-~-> 00:28:07 |the decoupling this morning, we still were able to ferret out, you know, | ||
209 | |208 |00:28:07 ~-~-> 00:28:13 |certain aspects of price. But it's not enough to warrant an entry, because, | ||
210 | |209 |00:28:13 ~-~-> 00:28:17 |just because you got in a trade, who cares if I would have got in here on | ||
211 | |210 |00:28:17 ~-~-> 00:28:21 |that? Who cares if I would have, you know, took profit down here, or had a | ||
212 | |211 |00:28:21 ~-~-> 00:28:24 |runner still that takes another car shot below that low and if it delivered, who | ||
213 | |212 |00:28:24 ~-~-> 00:28:29 |cares? It would. It would not mean anything to me as an educator, because | ||
214 | |213 |00:28:29 ~-~-> 00:28:32 |I've already outlined it as it's a decoupled market. It means it doesn't | ||
215 | |214 |00:28:32 ~-~-> 00:28:36 |have the highest degree probability. And as an educator, I'm trying to teach you | ||
216 | |215 |00:28:36 ~-~-> 00:28:40 |to focus on those circumstances, not just simply because, oh, there's a PD | ||
217 | |216 |00:28:40 ~-~-> 00:28:44 |array, and there's a liquidity pool. So let's couple those together and this, | ||
218 | |217 |00:28:44 ~-~-> 00:28:48 |throw anything at the wall and see what sticks as a short. And then you wonder | ||
219 | |218 |00:28:48 ~-~-> 00:28:52 |why you getting chopped up. Your Account being ground down, blown accounts, | ||
220 | |219 |00:28:52 ~-~-> 00:28:57 |failed combines, failed, funded accounts, losing real money and then | ||
221 | |220 |00:28:57 ~-~-> 00:29:05 |failure. It's because you're forcing things in conditions faster than you | ||
222 | |221 |00:29:05 ~-~-> 00:29:10 |should. In other words, you're taking a leap of faith when it doesn't warrant | ||
223 | |222 |00:29:10 ~-~-> 00:29:15 |that. Whereas if you had a lot of things going in your favor, where all the | ||
224 | |223 |00:29:15 ~-~-> 00:29:18 |indices were, all three were in agreement, they were moving in the same | ||
225 | |224 |00:29:18 ~-~-> 00:29:21 |direction. We traded back to the first presented Fairbank gap, and then it | ||
226 | |225 |00:29:21 ~-~-> 00:29:25 |showed displacement after that, then it's easy. We could drop down to a 15 | ||
227 | |226 |00:29:25 ~-~-> 00:29:29 |second chart and take the very next fair value gap and trade, you know, in the in | ||
228 | |227 |00:29:29 ~-~-> 00:29:34 |that direction. It need not be complicated. But what does make it | ||
229 | |228 |00:29:34 ~-~-> 00:29:39 |complicated is you wrestling with your emotions and your impatience, because | ||
230 | |229 |00:29:39 ~-~-> 00:29:42 |you just simply want to get in here and do something, especially if you have | ||
231 | |230 |00:29:42 ~-~-> 00:29:46 |never made money or a profitable trade, even in demo yet, using the material and | ||
232 | |231 |00:29:46 ~-~-> 00:29:51 |teaching you're you're rushing to get to that one moment where it worked in your | ||
233 | |232 |00:29:51 ~-~-> 00:29:54 |hands, because you're telling yourself, if it does this, then I will be able to | ||
234 | |233 |00:29:54 ~-~-> 00:30:00 |stick with it. Because it's it's hard to learn how to be disciplined. It's. Hard | ||
235 | |234 |00:30:00 ~-~-> 00:30:04 |not. It's not hard to learn from me. If anybody gives you really specific rules | ||
236 | |235 |00:30:04 ~-~-> 00:30:09 |and a lot of a lot of limitations to say it that way, it's going to be hard to | ||
237 | |236 |00:30:09 ~-~-> 00:30:12 |learn under that. I'm looking at this little gap right here. I'm | ||
238 | |237 |00:30:25 ~-~-> 00:30:26 |Yeah, should be rolling over. | ||
239 | |238 |00:30:36 ~-~-> 00:30:44 |Really ugly, really, really ugly, but one of the things that I've appreciated | ||
240 | |239 |00:30:44 ~-~-> 00:30:49 |as an educator in this year's mentorship lectures is the feedback in the | ||
241 | |240 |00:30:49 ~-~-> 00:30:53 |comments. I see all of your comments, by the way, some of you are doing it very | ||
242 | |241 |00:30:54 ~-~-> 00:30:58 |smart by taking and leading little time stamps for things, for your notes. No | ||
243 | |242 |00:30:58 ~-~-> 00:31:04 |one else sees them. I can see them, but you're using the comment section on the | ||
244 | |243 |00:31:04 ~-~-> 00:31:08 |2024 mentorship videos as a way of annotating it, like it's your own | ||
245 | |244 |00:31:08 ~-~-> 00:31:11 |personal journal. That's the that's the right way of using my comment section, | ||
246 | |245 |00:31:12 ~-~-> 00:31:17 |okay? But I see every comment, every single one of them, the really long | ||
247 | |246 |00:31:17 ~-~-> 00:31:20 |ones. I generally skip over them because I don't have time to go through all that | ||
248 | |247 |00:31:20 ~-~-> 00:31:24 |stuff. And I'm sure they're very nice comments or whatever, but I don't have | ||
249 | |248 |00:31:24 ~-~-> 00:31:28 |time to read that kind of stuff so but usually the real short to a point. Thank | ||
250 | |249 |00:31:28 ~-~-> 00:31:32 |you so much. Or could you talk about this? Or I didn't understand that I use | ||
251 | |250 |00:31:32 ~-~-> 00:31:36 |all those things to kind of like, go into the discussion points in my next | ||
252 | |251 |00:31:36 ~-~-> 00:31:40 |lecture. Or if I come back around and talk about that topic again, I'll pull | ||
253 | |252 |00:31:40 ~-~-> 00:31:44 |from my notes any like bullet point things I want to kind of ring into the | ||
254 | |253 |00:31:44 ~-~-> 00:31:53 |conversation, the the feedback of you know, knowing when to sit still, because | ||
255 | |254 |00:31:53 ~-~-> 00:31:58 |the folks that are being honest and saying that they have had difficulty | ||
256 | |255 |00:31:58 ~-~-> 00:32:03 |initially, And now they're becoming a little bit more responsible, and they're | ||
257 | |256 |00:32:03 ~-~-> 00:32:07 |admitting that their results that were adverse initially was due to their | ||
258 | |257 |00:32:07 ~-~-> 00:32:09 |impatience, and then trying to do something too fast before they | ||
259 | |258 |00:32:09 ~-~-> 00:32:15 |understood what they were doing, and also forcing my concepts in conditions | ||
260 | |259 |00:32:15 ~-~-> 00:32:20 |that I as the author would never do it like I'm explaining today, what it is | ||
261 | |260 |00:32:20 ~-~-> 00:32:25 |that makes this morning a little bit more it doesn't mean it's impossible. It | ||
262 | |261 |00:32:25 ~-~-> 00:32:28 |just means that it's gonna be harder for you as a new trader, new student, to | ||
263 | |262 |00:32:28 ~-~-> 00:32:40 |navigate it. Hey, hush so down once more. Scouts always gotta her name's | ||
264 | |263 |00:32:40 ~-~-> 00:32:51 |Scout, S, C, O, U, T, not scalp. Like, like Boy Scout, like snipe, a Scout | ||
265 | |264 |00:32:51 ~-~-> 00:32:58 |Sniper. That's basically she's always got to show herself, don't you? Hey, | ||
266 | |265 |00:32:58 ~-~-> 00:33:09 |little girl, how's she that we've had your cameo for this morning, and look at | ||
267 | |266 |00:33:09 ~-~-> 00:33:15 |this price action. Compare that with what we just saw in the Dow. And then | ||
268 | |267 |00:33:15 ~-~-> 00:33:15 |now, Then | ||
269 | |268 |00:33:22 ~-~-> 00:33:23 |shut her up. You. | ||
270 | |269 |00:34:18 ~-~-> 00:34:26 |Sorry about that. All right, so I'd like to see if it can come back up in to the | ||
271 | |270 |00:34:26 ~-~-> 00:34:30 |range. Here it's it's done enough exploring for me. If it wants to go back | ||
272 | |271 |00:34:30 ~-~-> 00:34:34 |up in the air, I would like to see it come back and trade back into the | ||
273 | |272 |00:34:34 ~-~-> 00:34:40 |opening range gap. Would not want to short it would not be interested in | ||
274 | |273 |00:34:40 ~-~-> 00:34:48 |chasing it lower, s, p is shrugging off any willingness to want to go lower. | ||
275 | |274 |00:34:53 ~-~-> 00:35:01 |So look at the low here at 951, to present. Okay, and then look at the | ||
276 | |275 |00:35:01 ~-~-> 00:35:13 |NASDAQ. Lower in NASDAQ, which is what we expected anyway. We wanted to see the | ||
277 | |276 |00:35:13 ~-~-> 00:35:18 |NASDAQ lead to the downside, but the the SAP I mentioned earlier, I said I'd like | ||
278 | |277 |00:35:18 ~-~-> 00:35:21 |to see if it's going to show an unwillingness and kind of shrug off any | ||
279 | |278 |00:35:21 ~-~-> 00:35:27 |weakness we've we've seen that thus far. So in other words, then the S, P has not | ||
280 | |279 |00:35:27 ~-~-> 00:35:30 |been wanting to go lower, and you can already see how it's showing its | ||
281 | |280 |00:35:30 ~-~-> 00:35:35 |willingness to want to go higher now and not go lower. Focus in here and over | ||
282 | |281 |00:35:35 ~-~-> 00:35:36 |here, I'm | ||
283 | |282 |00:35:47 ~-~-> 00:35:59 |and then the minor one is here. And then Dow, still wanting to do what it wants | ||
284 | |283 |00:35:59 ~-~-> 00:36:01 |to do, the old Brett. | ||
285 | |284 |00:36:07 ~-~-> 00:36:13 |All right? And I think we're a little too far extended to want to come back | ||
286 | |285 |00:36:13 ~-~-> 00:36:21 |into this. I mean, it can, but I wouldn't demand it. And now, this one | ||
287 | |286 |00:36:21 ~-~-> 00:36:23 |right in here, remember I was telling you earlier? Telling you earlier that | ||
288 | |287 |00:36:23 ~-~-> 00:36:26 |could end up becoming an inversion fair value gap if we were trade back into the | ||
289 | |288 |00:36:26 ~-~-> 00:36:32 |range after breaking now below to the sell side we've seen so far over here. | ||
290 | |289 |00:36:32 ~-~-> 00:36:34 |Now sell side resides here. | ||
291 | |290 |00:36:42 ~-~-> 00:36:51 |If that. And what we want to see, what I would rather see is dow continue doing | ||
292 | |291 |00:36:51 ~-~-> 00:36:56 |what it's doing, going higher or consolidate, not drop. Let me go back | ||
293 | |292 |00:36:56 ~-~-> 00:37:10 |into the Dow. Dow either stays going higher or consolidates and allows ES to | ||
294 | |293 |00:37:10 ~-~-> 00:37:14 |hold his ground, not break below this low. We don't want to see that and | ||
295 | |294 |00:37:16 ~-~-> 00:37:21 |notice this width I was drawing on this consequent encroachment. It stopped it | ||
296 | |295 |00:37:21 ~-~-> 00:37:27 |here, traded back above it. And then the bodies consequent encroachment of this | ||
297 | |296 |00:37:27 ~-~-> 00:37:30 |wick, and then the low of that candlestick, right there, you see that. | ||
298 | |297 |00:37:30 ~-~-> 00:37:33 |And then this volume imbalance, we traded through it. And look what | ||
299 | |298 |00:37:33 ~-~-> 00:37:37 |happened right here. The body stopped on that high of that volume of balance. And | ||
300 | |299 |00:37:37 ~-~-> 00:37:41 |it stopped on the body right there at the open and started rallying, and it | ||
301 | |300 |00:37:41 ~-~-> 00:37:45 |went down into it, but didn't breach it. See that, it's interesting, isn't it | ||
302 | |301 |00:37:46 ~-~-> 00:37:49 |back into this fair value gap, but the liquidity rests here. So it doesn't make | ||
303 | |302 |00:37:49 ~-~-> 00:37:53 |any sense for it to come all up here, just to get to that it's already shown | ||
304 | |303 |00:37:53 ~-~-> 00:37:58 |it's not wanting to go to its own cell sign, which was down there. So so far, | ||
305 | |304 |00:37:58 ~-~-> 00:38:01 |even though it's decoupled, if you you're going to want to listen to this | ||
306 | |305 |00:38:01 ~-~-> 00:38:06 |again, even though it's not an exciting lecture. It's teaching you visibility | ||
307 | |306 |00:38:06 ~-~-> 00:38:10 |through this chaotic decoupling between the three averages, doing all different | ||
308 | |307 |00:38:10 ~-~-> 00:38:16 |things. I'm pulling out the things that are salient. What would be catalyst for | ||
309 | |308 |00:38:16 ~-~-> 00:38:21 |the market to see it back into its range? The s, p, would shake off any | ||
310 | |309 |00:38:21 ~-~-> 00:38:26 |weakness. That means it sets the stage for what SMT divergence, which it was | ||
311 | |310 |00:38:26 ~-~-> 00:38:35 |not willing to make lower lows here, when the NASDAQ was able to make lower | ||
312 | |311 |00:38:35 ~-~-> 00:38:42 |lows, and now we're trading up into this gap here. So we want to see, does it | ||
313 | |312 |00:38:42 ~-~-> 00:38:46 |want to trade? It can accumulate in here and run right out of that? That's that's | ||
314 | |313 |00:38:46 ~-~-> 00:38:51 |one of the caveats to an inversion fair value gap. If a market's extremely | ||
315 | |314 |00:38:51 ~-~-> 00:38:55 |strong and you're expecting it to perform like, like I've outlined here | ||
316 | |315 |00:38:55 ~-~-> 00:39:00 |before, before we even move back up into, I said, once we hit sell side, if | ||
317 | |316 |00:39:00 ~-~-> 00:39:06 |the ES fails to shrug off, I'm sorry if it fails and shrugs off weakness. That | ||
318 | |317 |00:39:06 ~-~-> 00:39:10 |means it fails to drop down, which is what we've seen so far, then this could | ||
319 | |318 |00:39:10 ~-~-> 00:39:15 |become an inversion fair value gap. And then we watched the NASDAQ create lower | ||
320 | |319 |00:39:15 ~-~-> 00:39:21 |low, but then the ES failed to make a lower low. At the same time that the | ||
321 | |320 |00:39:21 ~-~-> 00:39:26 |NASDAQ did that lower low at the same time that the Dow just keeps going | ||
322 | |321 |00:39:26 ~-~-> 00:39:33 |higher. So the way these indices could come back into agreement and become | ||
323 | |322 |00:39:33 ~-~-> 00:39:38 |symmetrical is dow stays consolidated. Don't don't lose, don't lose any ground, | ||
324 | |323 |00:39:38 ~-~-> 00:39:45 |don't go lower or keep going higher, and then es fails to make a lower low, and | ||
325 | |324 |00:39:45 ~-~-> 00:39:49 |that's what we've seen so far. NASDAQ makes the lower low and then comes back | ||
326 | |325 |00:39:49 ~-~-> 00:39:54 |into its range and uses this as an inversion fair value gap. Now the caveat | ||
327 | |326 |00:39:54 ~-~-> 00:39:59 |is it can just leave this thing and never come back down and touch it. You. | ||
328 | |327 |00:40:00 ~-~-> 00:40:03 |And use it as a discount array. So that's why, sometimes, if I'm extremely | ||
329 | |328 |00:40:03 ~-~-> 00:40:07 |if I'm really convicted on the idea that I think the market's going to go higher, | ||
330 | |329 |00:40:07 ~-~-> 00:40:11 |in this instance, I'd be taking the trade as it's hitting this candlesticks | ||
331 | |330 |00:40:11 ~-~-> 00:40:14 |high right there. We're trading right at this point now, because it's in | ||
332 | |331 |00:40:14 ~-~-> 00:40:18 |consequence, I'm just going to highlight the midpoint of it. So it kind of like | ||
333 | |332 |00:40:18 ~-~-> 00:40:27 |highlights the halfway point I'm uh, in instances where it's really bullish, it | ||
334 | |333 |00:40:27 ~-~-> 00:40:35 |affords me to get my first six contracts on, and I may not get my four contracts | ||
335 | |334 |00:40:35 ~-~-> 00:40:38 |if it comes back down and touches the high of the gap, which is this | ||
336 | |335 |00:40:38 ~-~-> 00:40:43 |candlestick low. So that's why, many times, if you look at my examples, I'm | ||
337 | |336 |00:40:43 ~-~-> 00:40:46 |entering inside of an inversion fair value gap before it actually proves | ||
338 | |337 |00:40:46 ~-~-> 00:40:50 |itself to you as my students, because I understand a little bit more what I'm | ||
339 | |338 |00:40:50 ~-~-> 00:40:54 |looking for. And I've also had instances where it just runs right out of the | ||
340 | |339 |00:40:54 ~-~-> 00:40:59 |inversion Fairbank, and I don't get either my fill or my second partial to | ||
341 | |340 |00:40:59 ~-~-> 00:41:04 |build into a pyramided position. So it's, it's kind of like a knack thing. I | ||
342 | |341 |00:41:04 ~-~-> 00:41:09 |don't have any rules that I could adequately explain to know when it just | ||
343 | |342 |00:41:09 ~-~-> 00:41:13 |runs away from the inversion fair value gap. It just just happens, kind of like | ||
344 | |343 |00:41:13 ~-~-> 00:41:17 |the same thing we've seen here, where I identified, for you, the first presented | ||
345 | |344 |00:41:17 ~-~-> 00:41:22 |fair value gap, but it, it didn't deliver to it as a short Okay, well, | ||
346 | |345 |00:41:22 ~-~-> 00:41:26 |because it dropped lower, we watched this thing pretty, pretty closely. This | ||
347 | |346 |00:41:26 ~-~-> 00:41:33 |morning. We called out the s, p, potentially shaking off any weakness, | ||
348 | |347 |00:41:34 ~-~-> 00:41:38 |and in a doubt, keep going higher. So we have a decoupled market, and we were | ||
349 | |348 |00:41:38 ~-~-> 00:41:42 |able to still see certain aspects and what price is likely to do, doesn't mean | ||
350 | |349 |00:41:42 ~-~-> 00:41:46 |it's going to always do it. I get it wrong a lot when it's decoupled. Don't, | ||
351 | |350 |00:41:46 ~-~-> 00:41:49 |don't think for a second. I'm trying to sell you on the idea that I'm 100% | ||
352 | |351 |00:41:50 ~-~-> 00:41:53 |inaccurate when there's a decoupling between the three averages. When I say | ||
353 | |352 |00:41:53 ~-~-> 00:41:58 |it becomes complicated and complex for precision, I mean it because there's a | ||
354 | |353 |00:41:58 ~-~-> 00:42:02 |lot of things that would otherwise be in play that I could point out to and say, | ||
355 | |354 |00:42:02 ~-~-> 00:42:07 |Look at this, and look at that. We're seeing a lot less of that here. There's | ||
356 | |355 |00:42:07 ~-~-> 00:42:10 |enough of them, obviously, for you to scratch your head and say, Wow, there | ||
357 | |356 |00:42:10 ~-~-> 00:42:13 |really is something to this. But it's not enough for me to feel convicted | ||
358 | |357 |00:42:13 ~-~-> 00:42:16 |enough to get in there and press the button and enter with real money. That's | ||
359 | |358 |00:42:16 ~-~-> 00:42:23 |kind of like what I'm trying to get at. So just know that if you're feeling the | ||
360 | |359 |00:42:23 ~-~-> 00:42:28 |impulse to want to send me a comment about, can you teach us how to know when | ||
361 | |360 |00:42:28 ~-~-> 00:42:31 |it's never going to come back to the inversion for everybody you got, I don't | ||
362 | |361 |00:42:31 ~-~-> 00:42:39 |have a way to articulate that, that that's an, that's a, I don't know | ||
363 | |362 |00:42:39 ~-~-> 00:42:42 |that's, that's, that's a limitation on me as a mentor. I just don't know how to | ||
364 | |363 |00:42:42 ~-~-> 00:42:47 |teach that. That's, there's a lot of things I have, those types of things | ||
365 | |364 |00:42:47 ~-~-> 00:42:51 |with that I'll never they're like taboo conversations where I'm never going to | ||
366 | |365 |00:42:51 ~-~-> 00:42:55 |bring them up because to do so or use them in a trade idea and trade them, | ||
367 | |366 |00:42:55 ~-~-> 00:43:01 |execute on them and say, This is my so and so, if I don't have a way of | ||
368 | |367 |00:43:02 ~-~-> 00:43:06 |explaining it to my kids, I'm certainly not going to have it to explain it to | ||
369 | |368 |00:43:06 ~-~-> 00:43:09 |you. So it's just one of those things I have my back pocket that it's an | ||
370 | |369 |00:43:09 ~-~-> 00:43:13 |experience thing. It's something I've acquired over years of doing it. And | ||
371 | |370 |00:43:14 ~-~-> 00:43:17 |it's not something that's an event. It's an it's not an advantage. It's just a | ||
372 | |371 |00:43:17 ~-~-> 00:43:22 |me. It's a me thing to justify why I don't have to have a return back to that | ||
373 | |372 |00:43:22 ~-~-> 00:43:27 |inversion fair value gap, because my compensation is I just go in when I know | ||
374 | |373 |00:43:27 ~-~-> 00:43:31 |I'm bullish, I'll just enter inside of the inversion fair value gap as it | ||
375 | |374 |00:43:31 ~-~-> 00:43:35 |touches the candle that enters it, which is here, we saw that there, and I said, | ||
376 | |375 |00:43:35 ~-~-> 00:43:38 |or I'll just go in at the consequent crushment And look at the bodies of the | ||
377 | |376 |00:43:38 ~-~-> 00:43:41 |candles right there. You see that. And then we've already delivered here. So | ||
378 | |377 |00:43:41 ~-~-> 00:43:45 |this is right here, more than most of the folks you see on live streamers that | ||
379 | |378 |00:43:45 ~-~-> 00:43:50 |they're trying to capture, something like that, all live explained to you, | ||
380 | |379 |00:43:51 ~-~-> 00:43:57 |even in a little bit more difficult market. But these are the kind of | ||
381 | |380 |00:43:57 ~-~-> 00:44:01 |lectures that I wish someone was teaching when I was coming up in 1992 | ||
382 | |381 |00:44:01 ~-~-> 00:44:06 |because that would have really helped me slow down, and I would have not hurt | ||
383 | |382 |00:44:06 ~-~-> 00:44:11 |myself as much as I did, because I was in a rush to try to make money and quit | ||
384 | |383 |00:44:11 ~-~-> 00:44:14 |my job and get out of poverty. Basically, you know, I was living | ||
385 | |384 |00:44:14 ~-~-> 00:44:20 |paycheck to paycheck with a part time job and in school. So it was, it was a | ||
386 | |385 |00:44:20 ~-~-> 00:44:27 |wreck. Let's take a quick look at the Dow once more. | ||
387 | |386 |00:44:32 ~-~-> 00:44:44 |Okay, and yes, instead of buy side here. That's probably random. And then we | ||
388 | |387 |00:44:44 ~-~-> 00:44:49 |would want to see it, just for good measure, I'd like to see it, okay, smoke | ||
389 | |388 |00:44:49 ~-~-> 00:44:56 |those highs right there. We could do that before 1030 fill. I'd appreciate it | ||
390 | |389 |00:44:56 ~-~-> 00:45:10 |if it's a. A friendly request, and then back to NASDAQ. See how we just keep | ||
391 | |390 |00:45:10 ~-~-> 00:45:15 |gaining ground, and we never came back into what would be viewed as inversion | ||
392 | |391 |00:45:15 ~-~-> 00:45:21 |fair value gap, if you're extremely bullish and what you've already outlined | ||
393 | |392 |00:45:21 ~-~-> 00:45:25 |or anticipate as an inversion fair value got if you're bullish, like if you're | ||
394 | |393 |00:45:25 ~-~-> 00:45:28 |really, really bullish, why would you wait for it to come away from it and | ||
395 | |394 |00:45:28 ~-~-> 00:45:45 |come back down? That is a in a lot of ways, that is a I uh, slow to the dance | ||
396 | |395 |00:45:45 ~-~-> 00:45:51 |party, or last to the dance floor perspective. If you really want to get | ||
397 | |396 |00:45:51 ~-~-> 00:45:55 |out there and Boogie and get down, then get out and get down. So if I know I'm | ||
398 | |397 |00:45:55 ~-~-> 00:45:59 |bullish, once we enter this area in here, I already have the conviction that | ||
399 | |398 |00:45:59 ~-~-> 00:46:04 |I want to see it, use it as a inversion fair value gap. So why would I give up | ||
400 | |399 |00:46:04 ~-~-> 00:46:08 |the opportunity to take an entry at a very low price inside that inversion | ||
401 | |400 |00:46:08 ~-~-> 00:46:12 |fair value gap, like at the top of that candlestick here, or at the mean | ||
402 | |401 |00:46:12 ~-~-> 00:46:16 |threshold, oops, mean threshold, the consequent encroachment, which is the | ||
403 | |402 |00:46:16 ~-~-> 00:46:21 |midpoint of this gap. And you can see the bodies delivering on that basis | ||
404 | |403 |00:46:21 ~-~-> 00:46:25 |right there. And that, to me is, you know, again, a signature that I try to | ||
405 | |404 |00:46:25 ~-~-> 00:46:29 |press upon you as my students to say, look, you know, what's the chances of | ||
406 | |405 |00:46:29 ~-~-> 00:46:33 |that happening where the bodies closed and open on the second candle occur | ||
407 | |406 |00:46:33 ~-~-> 00:46:37 |right at the midpoint? And these are things that I keep teaching you to look | ||
408 | |407 |00:46:37 ~-~-> 00:46:43 |for. And it's a farce for everyone to come out here and say that doesn't agree | ||
409 | |408 |00:46:43 ~-~-> 00:46:47 |with an algorithmic price delivery mechanism or engine that delivers price. | ||
410 | |409 |00:46:47 ~-~-> 00:46:50 |They'll say it's buying and selling pressure. And my question is is, how on | ||
411 | |410 |00:46:50 ~-~-> 00:46:57 |earth, how on earth did the buyers and sellers agree to allow the candlesticks | ||
412 | |411 |00:46:57 ~-~-> 00:47:01 |that are time based here in the time based candlestick is your advantage | ||
413 | |412 |00:47:02 ~-~-> 00:47:06 |these Renko things, or whatever else kind of bars you want to call it range | ||
414 | |413 |00:47:06 ~-~-> 00:47:10 |bars, they are not going to give you the insight that the algorithm is literally | ||
415 | |414 |00:47:10 ~-~-> 00:47:14 |never going to be able to hide from you. It's never, ever, ever going to be able | ||
416 | |415 |00:47:14 ~-~-> 00:47:18 |to hide from you, as long as you're utilizing the aspect of time first. And | ||
417 | |416 |00:47:18 ~-~-> 00:47:22 |that's what an open, high, low close, or a candlestick with open, high, low and | ||
418 | |417 |00:47:22 ~-~-> 00:47:28 |close function is in charting. So if you're looking at price through the lens | ||
419 | |418 |00:47:28 ~-~-> 00:47:33 |of this mechanism, you're never going to be lost. It doesn't mean you're going to | ||
420 | |419 |00:47:33 ~-~-> 00:47:36 |be right about everything you're looking for. It just means that you're never | ||
421 | |420 |00:47:36 ~-~-> 00:47:40 |going to not be able to see what the algorithm is doing. But when they get in | ||
422 | |421 |00:47:40 ~-~-> 00:47:45 |there, they intervene. You also can see that too. You can also see when that's | ||
423 | |422 |00:47:45 ~-~-> 00:47:49 |occurring. You cannot see that with range bars. You cannot see that with | ||
424 | |423 |00:47:49 ~-~-> 00:47:54 |hikinashi. You can't see that with all this other nonsense, these things, these | ||
425 | |424 |00:47:54 ~-~-> 00:47:57 |gimmicks, they're all designed. I'm watching this little gap right here. I | ||
426 | |425 |00:47:57 ~-~-> 00:48:02 |know it's hard to see because I got my watermark on it. That little gap right | ||
427 | |426 |00:48:02 ~-~-> 00:48:06 |there. I don't want to paint over top of what I already have here, because I'm | ||
428 | |427 |00:48:06 ~-~-> 00:48:10 |watching. Does it want to just spike into this and then try to continue on? | ||
429 | |428 |00:48:10 ~-~-> 00:48:17 |Or does it want to use this order block right here? The I'm waiting to see if it | ||
430 | |429 |00:48:17 ~-~-> 00:48:21 |can get up in the first presented fair value. That's kind of like, really want | ||
431 | |430 |00:48:21 ~-~-> 00:48:24 |to, want to see, I'm hoping it could do that before we close session. But if it | ||
432 | |431 |00:48:24 ~-~-> 00:48:29 |doesn't do it by 1030 you know, I'll leave you with my comments before I | ||
433 | |432 |00:48:29 ~-~-> 00:48:32 |close the stream down. But this is enough. This is a profitable study so | ||
434 | |433 |00:48:32 ~-~-> 00:48:36 |far because we're working in a problematic condition. You're not going | ||
435 | |434 |00:48:36 ~-~-> 00:48:40 |to hear your live streamers explain to you what's going on, why the markets are | ||
436 | |435 |00:48:40 ~-~-> 00:48:43 |decoupled. You're not going to explain to you which which markets going to | ||
437 | |436 |00:48:43 ~-~-> 00:48:46 |behave a certain way, which one's going to fail to make a lower low and which | ||
438 | |437 |00:48:46 ~-~-> 00:48:49 |one is going to make a low income back in the range. That's exactly what you | ||
439 | |438 |00:48:49 ~-~-> 00:48:52 |watched me do today. There's no way around that. It's exactly what you've | ||
440 | |439 |00:48:52 ~-~-> 00:48:57 |watched me do. I've explained it. I gave you details. I tried to be very succinct | ||
441 | |440 |00:48:57 ~-~-> 00:49:00 |about it today, because I had a lot of fun yesterday, in case you didn't | ||
442 | |441 |00:49:00 ~-~-> 00:49:09 |notice, but I wanted to be a little bit more academic with you today, and based | ||
443 | |442 |00:49:09 ~-~-> 00:49:13 |on what we were watching this morning, it gave me a wonderful stage to do that, | ||
444 | |443 |00:49:13 ~-~-> 00:49:18 |because you got to know how to trade if you're going to navigate these types of | ||
445 | |444 |00:49:18 ~-~-> 00:49:21 |markets like today, if you don't know how to trade, you're not going to Know | ||
446 | |445 |00:49:21 ~-~-> 00:49:24 |what I'm telling you. You're not going to see it and know that. Okay, this is | ||
447 | |446 |00:49:24 ~-~-> 00:49:29 |not something I want to be participating in, and that's experience. And most of | ||
448 | |447 |00:49:29 ~-~-> 00:49:33 |these live streamers, they don't have that kind of experience. No knock | ||
449 | |448 |00:49:33 ~-~-> 00:49:40 |against any of them, really, but they don't have it. So we're back inside that | ||
450 | |449 |00:49:40 ~-~-> 00:49:45 |order block I was mentioning right here still, still could come right back down | ||
451 | |450 |00:49:45 ~-~-> 00:49:49 |in and hit that inversion fairbag app, it's not, it's not out the realm of | ||
452 | |451 |00:49:49 ~-~-> 00:49:52 |possibilities. It still can do that because there's a little gap in here. | ||
453 | |452 |00:49:52 ~-~-> 00:49:56 |But preferably I'd like to see that stay open. If I could see that stay open, | ||
454 | |453 |00:49:56 ~-~-> 00:50:00 |that would fuel a run higher than the first retention Fairbank. Gap and a gap | ||
455 | |454 |00:50:00 ~-~-> 00:50:07 |closure, and then even here, but more so back to this buy side. There that line, | ||
456 | |455 |00:50:11 ~-~-> 00:50:15 |and despite everything that's been outlined here, I have absolutely zero | ||
457 | |456 |00:50:16 ~-~-> 00:50:24 |interest in being in the marketplace. And couple that with the visibility, | ||
458 | |457 |00:50:24 ~-~-> 00:50:27 |knowing what I'm looking for, even though it's something I'm not willing to | ||
459 | |458 |00:50:27 ~-~-> 00:50:32 |trade, still being able to anticipate what is likely to happen in price one on | ||
460 | |459 |00:50:32 ~-~-> 00:50:36 |one minute chart, where it's supposed to be just noise. Remember Goldman Sachs | ||
461 | |460 |00:50:36 ~-~-> 00:50:40 |guys, these alumni from Goldman Sachs, they're going to tell you that there's | ||
462 | |461 |00:50:40 ~-~-> 00:50:43 |no rhyme or reason why the market's going to go up. No one can tell you. No | ||
463 | |462 |00:50:43 ~-~-> 00:50:47 |con man can tell you when it's going to move or how it's going to go up, or | ||
464 | |463 |00:50:47 ~-~-> 00:50:51 |where it's going to move to on these lower time frames. But they're going to | ||
465 | |464 |00:50:51 ~-~-> 00:50:57 |say only higher time frames work. Price is doing the same thing when the higher | ||
466 | |465 |00:50:57 ~-~-> 00:51:00 |Time Frame chart that it's dealing in a lower time frame, it's not it's not a | ||
467 | |466 |00:51:00 ~-~-> 00:51:05 |different price. It's the same price. It's behaving the same way, whatever | ||
468 | |467 |00:51:05 ~-~-> 00:51:09 |price it is at the market at any given moment, whether we're looking at a one | ||
469 | |468 |00:51:09 ~-~-> 00:51:13 |minute chart, a 32nd chart, a one second chart, a weekly chart, it's still, it's | ||
470 | |469 |00:51:13 ~-~-> 00:51:17 |still the same price. And these are Goldman Sachs boys are telling that | ||
471 | |470 |00:51:17 ~-~-> 00:51:25 |these are supposed to be the the elites. They're not elites. They're not and | ||
472 | |471 |00:51:25 ~-~-> 00:51:29 |you're seeing that there's literally no reason to believe these type of people | ||
473 | |472 |00:51:29 ~-~-> 00:51:35 |that tell you, they try to discourage you when you're trying to learn how to | ||
474 | |473 |00:51:35 ~-~-> 00:51:38 |time the market correctly. And there's a way of doing it. I mean, I've proven it. | ||
475 | |474 |00:51:38 ~-~-> 00:51:43 |I've very, very wealthy students now that came out and they proved that they | ||
476 | |475 |00:51:43 ~-~-> 00:51:46 |have the receipts and whatnot, and they're using the same logics you're | ||
477 | |476 |00:51:46 ~-~-> 00:51:51 |learning right here, and they're getting more detail at the same time you're | ||
478 | |477 |00:51:51 ~-~-> 00:51:55 |learning it too in this 2024 mentorship, you're getting to see it over live price | ||
479 | |478 |00:51:55 ~-~-> 00:52:00 |action is exactly what I was doing with mentorship students, and it's | ||
480 | |479 |00:52:00 ~-~-> 00:52:04 |fascinating to See how some people don't see the value in it, because this is | ||
481 | |480 |00:52:04 ~-~-> 00:52:08 |exactly what I wanted. But I knew it didn't exist when I first started in | ||
482 | |481 |00:52:08 ~-~-> 00:52:15 |1992 no one was willing to do this. Not one person was willing to do this. And I | ||
483 | |482 |00:52:15 ~-~-> 00:52:18 |guess, in all fairness, I guess we really didn't have the technology at the | ||
484 | |483 |00:52:18 ~-~-> 00:52:23 |time to do it. I mean, I guess the best thing it was is we had message boards | ||
485 | |484 |00:52:23 ~-~-> 00:52:28 |back then and we had chat rooms. Okay, great, and it wasn't like this, where we | ||
486 | |485 |00:52:28 ~-~-> 00:52:32 |can literally share the screen, I can comment, or they could comment over | ||
487 | |486 |00:52:32 ~-~-> 00:52:35 |their charts live and build an idea around what it should behave, around | ||
488 | |487 |00:52:35 ~-~-> 00:52:41 |what it should be, what should it do next? And why should it do this? And why | ||
489 | |488 |00:52:41 ~-~-> 00:52:45 |should it not do the other things? And you can't get that from a book, okay? | ||
490 | |489 |00:52:45 ~-~-> 00:52:50 |You can't get that from people, even if you go to like a workshop or a seminar. | ||
491 | |490 |00:52:50 ~-~-> 00:52:55 |Most seminars are always, generally held on weekends, where it protects the | ||
492 | |491 |00:52:55 ~-~-> 00:52:59 |teacher from never be having the accountability and the responsibility of | ||
493 | |492 |00:52:59 ~-~-> 00:53:04 |proving it over live price action. And I've never been a fan of that. And | ||
494 | |493 |00:53:04 ~-~-> 00:53:07 |there's a lot of well known, quote, unquote, educators out there that did | ||
495 | |494 |00:53:07 ~-~-> 00:53:10 |all these types of workshops, you know, these three day workshops, or two day | ||
496 | |495 |00:53:10 ~-~-> 00:53:16 |weekend work workshops where you have the built in parachute protection of | ||
497 | |496 |00:53:16 ~-~-> 00:53:20 |never being held to Well, tell me how that would be used or seen in price | ||
498 | |497 |00:53:20 ~-~-> 00:53:24 |action live. They don't have to do that because it's on a Saturday and a Sunday, | ||
499 | |498 |00:53:24 ~-~-> 00:53:27 |right? Or in a Friday evening where you have a nice dinner experience with them, | ||
500 | |499 |00:53:27 ~-~-> 00:53:30 |yeah, screw that. I don't have that. I don't have any interest in that. Because | ||
501 | |500 |00:53:30 ~-~-> 00:53:33 |if you're not willing to get out here and explain it to me real time over | ||
502 | |501 |00:53:33 ~-~-> 00:53:36 |price action, give me, give me a little bit of time. You don't have to do it, | ||
503 | |502 |00:53:36 ~-~-> 00:53:40 |you know, for a whole year. You ain't got to do it for, you know, six months, | ||
504 | |503 |00:53:40 ~-~-> 00:53:44 |but give me a couple months at least. How about a month sit down and explain | ||
505 | |504 |00:53:44 ~-~-> 00:53:47 |the logic of what you're looking for in price action. And here I have been doing | ||
506 | |505 |00:53:47 ~-~-> 00:53:51 |it with you all, and still, I had students that said there was no value in | ||
507 | |506 |00:53:52 ~-~-> 00:53:56 |it, and that tells you that they're not willing to learn. They wanted signals. | ||
508 | |507 |00:53:56 ~-~-> 00:54:01 |That's what they wanted. They wanted to see signals generated. And the first | ||
509 | |508 |00:54:01 ~-~-> 00:54:07 |thing you have to learn is capital preservation, knowing how you're going | ||
510 | |509 |00:54:07 ~-~-> 00:54:11 |to lose money and what type of market environment you're going to lose money. | ||
511 | |510 |00:54:11 ~-~-> 00:54:15 |And if you can't recognize that, you're not going to recognize the increased | ||
512 | |511 |00:54:15 ~-~-> 00:54:22 |difficulty in you applying the things that work in good markets because the | ||
513 | |512 |00:54:22 ~-~-> 00:54:25 |complexity of having a market decoupled | ||
514 | |513 |00:54:27 ~-~-> 00:54:32 |and you trying to be demanding of precision elements that may elude you, | ||
515 | |514 |00:54:32 ~-~-> 00:54:36 |not because my concepts don't work. It's just because you're literally trying to | ||
516 | |515 |00:54:36 ~-~-> 00:54:41 |run in mud. It doesn't work that way. So you have to be a little bit more | ||
517 | |516 |00:54:41 ~-~-> 00:54:48 |reserved and say, Okay, I'm not trying to force a trade, but I am going to | ||
518 | |517 |00:54:48 ~-~-> 00:54:52 |watch price action and see if these things that are being outlined are | ||
519 | |518 |00:54:52 ~-~-> 00:54:57 |helpful. Are they indicating anything in terms of prognostication? Did you see | ||
520 | |519 |00:54:57 ~-~-> 00:55:05 |the the s? Let's go. Back to it real quick. Did you see the ES shrug off its | ||
521 | |520 |00:55:05 ~-~-> 00:55:10 |unwillingness or not want to go down to its lows here? It showed an | ||
522 | |521 |00:55:10 ~-~-> 00:55:15 |unwillingness to do that, as we indicated this morning. And it would run | ||
523 | |522 |00:55:15 ~-~-> 00:55:20 |for the buy side here, and it would run over here to that now, only a fraud | ||
524 | |523 |00:55:20 ~-~-> 00:55:26 |could tell you this beforehand, okay? I mean union rules as as you know, the | ||
525 | |524 |00:55:26 ~-~-> 00:55:32 |committee tells us, every fraud has to, you know, tell you in advance exactly | ||
526 | |525 |00:55:32 ~-~-> 00:55:35 |where the price is going to go on very complex days. We have to do that, | ||
527 | |526 |00:55:35 ~-~-> 00:55:42 |because if we don't do that, we can't be kept in the union protection. Okay? It's | ||
528 | |527 |00:55:42 ~-~-> 00:55:45 |just the union rules. It's something we all have to do, folks. It's just the way | ||
529 | |528 |00:55:45 ~-~-> 00:55:48 |it is. I can't do anything about it. But when we go back to the NQ, | ||
530 | |529 |00:55:54 ~-~-> 00:55:59 |make that in your documentary. We have the market making that lower low in | ||
531 | |530 |00:55:59 ~-~-> 00:56:03 |NASDAQ, as I indicated, would likely do after it took its initial sell side. | ||
532 | |531 |00:56:03 ~-~-> 00:56:06 |Remember, it was a little bit higher up here. It went down below it, and then I | ||
533 | |532 |00:56:06 ~-~-> 00:56:11 |wanted to see it trade back into its range if es failed to make a lower low. | ||
534 | |533 |00:56:11 ~-~-> 00:56:16 |So what did I do? I forecasted a SMT divergence. Before it happened, I told | ||
535 | |534 |00:56:16 ~-~-> 00:56:19 |you that we would see it return back into its range and come back up into the | ||
536 | |535 |00:56:19 ~-~-> 00:56:23 |first percent of fair value gap. And thank you so much, Phil for being a | ||
537 | |536 |00:56:23 ~-~-> 00:56:27 |gentleman today, allowing it to happen before 1030 and we're back inside the | ||
538 | |537 |00:56:27 ~-~-> 00:56:33 |opening range as well. So what I would like to see it do is just power on | ||
539 | |538 |00:56:33 ~-~-> 00:56:37 |higher up and punish those that are short, that have their stop loss sitting | ||
540 | |539 |00:56:37 ~-~-> 00:56:41 |right there. And if they're going to run that high, then it's reasonable to | ||
541 | |540 |00:56:41 ~-~-> 00:56:49 |anticipate that little Lego looking area price action I was mentioning earlier. | ||
542 | |541 |00:57:02 ~-~-> 00:57:09 |I I got this orient here. I'm trying to remember where I saw a little, tiny, | ||
543 | |542 |00:57:09 ~-~-> 00:57:18 |little segment of price action. It was a little too boxy looking. Anyway, the key | ||
544 | |543 |00:57:18 ~-~-> 00:57:22 |takeaways today are simply this. You're learning from somebody knows what | ||
545 | |544 |00:57:22 ~-~-> 00:57:25 |they're talking about. Talking about. And I do a lot of things online to stir | ||
546 | |545 |00:57:25 ~-~-> 00:57:29 |up a lot of commotion, because it's my way of bringing traffic to my channel. | ||
547 | |546 |00:57:29 ~-~-> 00:57:32 |Because I don't advertise or pay for advertisement, I never do that. I | ||
548 | |547 |00:57:32 ~-~-> 00:57:36 |manipulate the viewers mindset, so that way you're going to argue about | ||
549 | |548 |00:57:36 ~-~-> 00:57:39 |defending me or not defending me, or you're going to troll me, and because | ||
550 | |549 |00:57:39 ~-~-> 00:57:41 |you're talking about me, you're going to bring people to my channel and they're | ||
551 | |550 |00:57:41 ~-~-> 00:57:44 |going to watch me do things. Me do things like this, and then they're going | ||
552 | |551 |00:57:44 ~-~-> 00:57:47 |to be stuck in a quagmire, because they're going to either listen to your | ||
553 | |552 |00:57:47 ~-~-> 00:57:50 |opinion that's biased, because I gave you that opinion, because I I | ||
554 | |553 |00:57:50 ~-~-> 00:57:53 |manipulated that. I put you in that situation. They make you feel empowered, | ||
555 | |554 |00:57:53 ~-~-> 00:57:57 |so you can make videos about me, and then the people that watch your videos, | ||
556 | |555 |00:57:57 ~-~-> 00:58:01 |and you get paid for that, okay, but I'm not paying you, but you're going to send | ||
557 | |556 |00:58:01 ~-~-> 00:58:04 |those viewers right to this channel, and they're going to watch me outline this | ||
558 | |557 |00:58:04 ~-~-> 00:58:08 |stuff in advance, and it's going to be a question in their mind, either I'm time | ||
559 | |558 |00:58:08 ~-~-> 00:58:12 |traveling, I'm using delay data, if they're watching the stream later on, | ||
560 | |559 |00:58:12 ~-~-> 00:58:15 |and they're not here live, but there's so many people here watching it live, | ||
561 | |560 |00:58:16 ~-~-> 00:58:21 |it's undeniable. I'm on the lowest latency, the lowest latency on live | ||
562 | |561 |00:58:21 ~-~-> 00:58:25 |stream on YouTube. That's why they don't let me have the closed captions, because | ||
563 | |562 |00:58:25 ~-~-> 00:58:29 |if anyone wants a live stream and test it themselves, you'll see that you | ||
564 | |563 |00:58:29 ~-~-> 00:58:33 |cannot do closed caption when you're using the lowest latency. So if I'm | ||
565 | |564 |00:58:33 ~-~-> 00:58:36 |going to be talking to you over a one minute chart, or less than a one minute | ||
566 | |565 |00:58:36 ~-~-> 00:58:40 |chart, I'm going to use the lowest latency, because I want you to see there | ||
567 | |566 |00:58:40 ~-~-> 00:58:44 |is no delay. Okay? I'm not using a delay chart. I'm not I'm not defrauding you | ||
568 | |567 |00:58:44 ~-~-> 00:58:47 |with fake delayed data and using Market Replay. I'm not doing those things, | ||
569 | |568 |00:58:47 ~-~-> 00:58:54 |folks. I don't need that. I don't need a handicap like that. So the main takeaway | ||
570 | |569 |00:58:54 ~-~-> 00:59:00 |is this, I know what my algorithm is going to do. Yes, it's mine. Okay? It's | ||
571 | |570 |00:59:00 ~-~-> 00:59:03 |very, very straightforward, isn't it? Okay? It's the time to put the bullshit | ||
572 | |571 |00:59:03 ~-~-> 00:59:09 |aside. It's mine. It's got my fingerprints all over it, mine. Okay? | ||
573 | |572 |00:59:09 ~-~-> 00:59:14 |When I talk to you, I'm talking to you as its coder, okay? As its author, as | ||
574 | |573 |00:59:14 ~-~-> 00:59:19 |its designer and engineer. I am the man. I am the motherfucking man. Whether you | ||
575 | |574 |00:59:19 ~-~-> 00:59:23 |want to believe it or not, I don't give a shit. I don't care if I'm not allowed | ||
576 | |575 |00:59:23 ~-~-> 00:59:30 |to sit at the table. I'm gonna make more of me. Don't you get it? Don't you guess | ||
577 | |576 |00:59:30 ~-~-> 00:59:37 |my name. If I can sit here and tell you what the market's gonna do and what | ||
578 | |577 |00:59:37 ~-~-> 00:59:42 |market is gonna do this and what market's going to do that before it does | ||
579 | |578 |00:59:42 ~-~-> 00:59:48 |it, and then it behaves a certain way, and it delivers, and I tell you, an | ||
580 | |579 |00:59:48 ~-~-> 00:59:53 |inversion value, a fair value gap that was going to form here. It may not come | ||
581 | |580 |00:59:53 ~-~-> 00:59:57 |back down and touch it, and you're looking for it to come back down and | ||
582 | |581 |00:59:57 ~-~-> 01:00:01 |trade there, I'm telling you, I'm going to enter it. Uh, right there as it | ||
583 | |582 |01:00:01 ~-~-> 01:00:04 |touches the candlesticks high. And if I don't get that price, I'm going to get | ||
584 | |583 |01:00:04 ~-~-> 01:00:08 |the consequent encroachment, and then it runs away. Does it ever come back down | ||
585 | |584 |01:00:08 ~-~-> 01:00:11 |then touch that? No, I told you I wanted this fair bag. Got to stay open. Why? | ||
586 | |585 |01:00:12 ~-~-> 01:00:19 |Because that would be a breakaway gap. It leaves this PD array, and if it's | ||
587 | |586 |01:00:19 ~-~-> 01:00:23 |breaking away. It's not going to come back down. It could. It could have done | ||
588 | |587 |01:00:23 ~-~-> 01:00:26 |that. And then I would say that would be an entry point right there. But I said I | ||
589 | |588 |01:00:26 ~-~-> 01:00:30 |would prefer to stay open. And I told you I wanted to see it trade back up in | ||
590 | |589 |01:00:30 ~-~-> 01:00:33 |the opening range gap, which are these two blue lines here? But more | ||
591 | |590 |01:00:33 ~-~-> 01:00:36 |specifically, I want to see a trade back to my first presented fair value gap. | ||
592 | |591 |01:00:36 ~-~-> 01:00:40 |That's what it's coded to do. That's why it's there. That's why it's designed to | ||
593 | |592 |01:00:40 ~-~-> 01:00:45 |be there because it gives me an edge. It gives me the advantage that none of you | ||
594 | |593 |01:00:45 ~-~-> 01:00:49 |ever had, none of you ever had that advantage. None of you ever had the | ||
595 | |594 |01:00:49 ~-~-> 01:00:53 |ability to sit down and know exactly why it should do and why it should do | ||
596 | |595 |01:00:53 ~-~-> 01:00:58 |certain things. You've never heard another person ever ever sit here talk | ||
597 | |596 |01:00:58 ~-~-> 01:01:02 |to you with the authority that I owe. It's never happened, and I'm doing it | ||
598 | |597 |01:01:02 ~-~-> 01:01:05 |over live data, so there's no Joker that can come around and say, Oh, well, look | ||
599 | |598 |01:01:05 ~-~-> 01:01:08 |at this. And look at that. Look at everything. I want you to look at all | ||
600 | |599 |01:01:08 ~-~-> 01:01:13 |that stuff and come right here and watch me operate. That's what I want. I love | ||
601 | |600 |01:01:13 ~-~-> 01:01:17 |placing you in the hot seat where you're forced to to have you have to admit it. | ||
602 | |601 |01:01:18 ~-~-> 01:01:24 |You have to admit it that you're not seeing anything in retail here, you're | ||
603 | |602 |01:01:24 ~-~-> 01:01:30 |watching someone that knows exactly what's going to happen, period. And now | ||
604 | |603 |01:01:30 ~-~-> 01:01:34 |you're left with another testimony of that you have to arm wrestle with how I | ||
605 | |604 |01:01:34 ~-~-> 01:01:39 |knew how to do this today. How, how on earth could this possibly keep repeating | ||
606 | |605 |01:01:39 ~-~-> 01:01:45 |every single day, every single day, and you're out here wanting to send money to | ||
607 | |606 |01:01:45 ~-~-> 01:01:49 |these other people that are literally resetting their funded account | ||
608 | |607 |01:01:49 ~-~-> 01:01:55 |challenges in front of you, and they're making money off of you while failing in | ||
609 | |608 |01:01:55 ~-~-> 01:01:58 |front of you, not knowing where the market's going to go, but they have an | ||
610 | |609 |01:01:58 ~-~-> 01:02:03 |opinion about everybody else, and I'm literally laying this in your hands for | ||
611 | |610 |01:02:03 ~-~-> 01:02:08 |free. For free. There's no future mentorship. I have nothing dangling. | ||
612 | |611 |01:02:08 ~-~-> 01:02:13 |There's no carrot. There's nothing here, but just a simple truth. I told you who | ||
613 | |612 |01:02:13 ~-~-> 01:02:18 |I was from the beginning, but you don't want to believe me. How many times do I | ||
614 | |613 |01:02:18 ~-~-> 01:02:22 |keep doing it? How many times do you have to keep seeing me do these things | ||
615 | |614 |01:02:22 ~-~-> 01:02:29 |before you recognize who I am? Think, think, folks, how many times do you have | ||
616 | |615 |01:02:29 ~-~-> 01:02:38 |to see this? It's delicious. So there's a lot of things that you're going to be | ||
617 | |616 |01:02:38 ~-~-> 01:02:42 |met with on days like this, and you're going to expect to see certain things | ||
618 | |617 |01:02:43 ~-~-> 01:02:47 |pan out if you don't recognize the decoupling. And the decoupling, again, | ||
619 | |618 |01:02:47 ~-~-> 01:02:53 |is the unwillingness for all three averages to move in the same direction. | ||
620 | |619 |01:02:54 ~-~-> 01:02:58 |Okay? And as soon as you see this, this is what you want to write down your | ||
621 | |620 |01:02:58 ~-~-> 01:03:01 |notes, too, because I didn't mention this earlier, as soon as soon as you | ||
622 | |621 |01:03:01 ~-~-> 01:03:05 |notice that just the decoupling between the three averages where the Dow was | ||
623 | |622 |01:03:05 ~-~-> 01:03:10 |going up initially. Let me do this, because I really want to be able to show | ||
624 | |623 |01:03:10 ~-~-> 01:03:12 |it to you. All right. So | ||
625 | |624 |01:03:19 ~-~-> 01:03:27 |let's do this. I'm all right, so here's the NASDAQ chart, and then we're going | ||
626 | |625 |01:03:27 ~-~-> 01:03:32 |to put the Dow here. I'll save this part, and then I'm going to close it. I | ||
627 | |626 |01:03:32 ~-~-> 01:03:35 |know you want to know. You want me to keep going, going, going, I don't know, | ||
628 | |627 |01:03:35 ~-~-> 01:03:40 |like the Energizer button, but I've done enough for today. I want to take care of | ||
629 | |628 |01:03:40 ~-~-> 01:03:44 |some personal matters, I'm trying to find Delmonte sliced carrots, and I | ||
630 | |629 |01:03:44 ~-~-> 01:03:50 |don't know why I can't find them. Every store I go to, they don't have them, and | ||
631 | |630 |01:03:50 ~-~-> 01:03:55 |that's my preferred carrots. But I'm not eating a raw carrot for food storage. I | ||
632 | |631 |01:03:56 ~-~-> 01:04:00 |I prefer that one, and I don't know why I can't find them. If you know where I | ||
633 | |632 |01:04:00 ~-~-> 01:04:08 |can get some I appreciate it, but I'm on a hunt for Del Monte God carrots. So | ||
634 | |633 |01:04:08 ~-~-> 01:04:21 |here is the ES, here is, let's one minute chart on that, the Dow, yeah. | ||
635 | |634 |01:04:21 ~-~-> 01:04:31 |Okay, so we've seen at nine o'clock this morning the ES, it drops down. At nine | ||
636 | |635 |01:04:31 ~-~-> 01:04:34 |o'clock in the morning here we have a little bit of movement lower, and then | ||
637 | |636 |01:04:34 ~-~-> 01:04:38 |the Dow says, Oh, absolutely not. I'm not interested. It starts going higher | ||
638 | |637 |01:04:39 ~-~-> 01:04:46 |at the same time the the S P was going lower, and at the same time, we see the | ||
639 | |638 |01:04:46 ~-~-> 01:04:54 |NASDAQ dropping down, okay, in all this mess here, because listen, because there | ||
640 | |639 |01:04:54 ~-~-> 01:05:02 |is no symmetry meaning that you. The Dow was going one direction, s, p was going | ||
641 | |640 |01:05:02 ~-~-> 01:05:08 |lower, and NASDAQ was going lower. That's fine. How can I still read the | ||
642 | |641 |01:05:08 ~-~-> 01:05:14 |the NASDAQ like I did? Because I had the decoupling that still existed | ||
643 | |642 |01:05:14 ~-~-> 01:05:19 |directionally with the ES, I don't care so much about the Dow. The Dow tells me | ||
644 | |643 |01:05:19 ~-~-> 01:05:23 |I'm in a decoupled state. That means I'm going to lose a lot of precision. That | ||
645 | |644 |01:05:23 ~-~-> 01:05:28 |means I'm going to lose a lot of resolution, invisibility, of reading, | ||
646 | |645 |01:05:28 ~-~-> 01:05:32 |price action in my NASDAQ, and I'm definitely going to have a lot of | ||
647 | |646 |01:05:32 ~-~-> 01:05:37 |resolution issues in the ES. It's going to cause like a fuzzy, out of focus | ||
648 | |647 |01:05:37 ~-~-> 01:05:41 |picture, even though I can see it's likely to keep going down. And I told | ||
649 | |648 |01:05:41 ~-~-> 01:05:44 |you, listen, you're going to go back and listen to the stream and hear me say | ||
650 | |649 |01:05:44 ~-~-> 01:05:49 |this. I want to see es shrug off any willingness to go lower by shrugging off | ||
651 | |650 |01:05:49 ~-~-> 01:05:53 |weakness. That means failing to go lower. If it fails to go down, take it | ||
652 | |651 |01:05:53 ~-~-> 01:05:57 |sell side. That's what I want to see. I'm waiting to see that. That means, if | ||
653 | |652 |01:05:57 ~-~-> 01:06:00 |I'm expecting the NASA to go lower, that's going to do what, it's going to | ||
654 | |653 |01:06:00 ~-~-> 01:06:03 |create an SMT diversion. That means it's going to means it's going to fail to | ||
655 | |654 |01:06:03 ~-~-> 01:06:08 |make a lower low on es when the NASDAQ does make a lower low, and then the | ||
656 | |655 |01:06:08 ~-~-> 01:06:12 |NASDAQ will go up back into its range and trade back to its first potential | ||
657 | |656 |01:06:12 ~-~-> 01:06:18 |fair value gap. Tell me who called that. Tell me all you ICT mentorship guys out | ||
658 | |657 |01:06:18 ~-~-> 01:06:22 |there that are trying to teach my stuff. Tell me that you can go out there and do | ||
659 | |658 |01:06:22 ~-~-> 01:06:26 |this, tell me, because if you can do these types of things, then you earn the | ||
660 | |659 |01:06:26 ~-~-> 01:06:29 |right to teach my shit. Because you can't do these things. You didn't author | ||
661 | |660 |01:06:29 ~-~-> 01:06:32 |it, you didn't code it, you didn't design it, and you didn't put it out | ||
662 | |661 |01:06:32 ~-~-> 01:06:36 |there, period, simply that you don't know what the fuck you're doing. So stop | ||
663 | |662 |01:06:36 ~-~-> 01:06:39 |selling my shit. You don't have the right to do it. Okay? And all you guys | ||
664 | |663 |01:06:39 ~-~-> 01:06:41 |that have your channels up here with my shit, you're teaching it. Have you | ||
665 | |664 |01:06:41 ~-~-> 01:06:45 |noticed I'm taking those channels down? Channels down? Yeah, how about that? You | ||
666 | |665 |01:06:45 ~-~-> 01:06:49 |don't have the right to put my shit up on your channel, period. My videos are | ||
667 | |666 |01:06:49 ~-~-> 01:06:53 |my lecture. Stop uploading my shit and putting them in your language because | ||
668 | |667 |01:06:53 ~-~-> 01:06:56 |they're getting stripped down. And don't cry to me about, Oh, could you take the | ||
669 | |668 |01:06:56 ~-~-> 01:06:59 |copyright strike back? Fuck you. I'm not taking it back. You don't have my | ||
670 | |669 |01:06:59 ~-~-> 01:07:06 |permission to do that. I predicted with the logic explained to you in this live | ||
671 | |670 |01:07:06 ~-~-> 01:07:14 |stream. Why? Why the SMT diversions would occur, in which one the ES would | ||
672 | |671 |01:07:14 ~-~-> 01:07:19 |fail to make a lower low, it would shrug off weakness. I knew that was going to | ||
673 | |672 |01:07:19 ~-~-> 01:07:22 |happen. This is what you're writing down in your notes when you see decoupling, | ||
674 | |673 |01:07:23 ~-~-> 01:07:27 |and generally, you're going to see the Dow become That little brat. That's its | ||
675 | |674 |01:07:27 ~-~-> 01:07:33 |usefulness to me. I don't care that if the Dow makes a lower low and the s, p | ||
676 | |675 |01:07:33 ~-~-> 01:07:38 |fails to make a lower low, I don't see that as a divergence. That's not to me. | ||
677 | |676 |01:07:38 ~-~-> 01:07:44 |It's not SMT, because I know that the 30 stocks that make up the Dow are not that | ||
678 | |677 |01:07:44 ~-~-> 01:07:53 |impactful overall, but they will normally bend to the will of both the | ||
679 | |678 |01:07:53 ~-~-> 01:07:58 |averages. When ES and NASDAQ are going lower, it goes without reason. It goes | ||
680 | |679 |01:07:58 ~-~-> 01:08:03 |without saying that all boats rise in high tide, and they all go, they drop in | ||
681 | |680 |01:08:03 ~-~-> 01:08:07 |low tide. Okay, that that's that's the analogy here. So when it's really, | ||
682 | |681 |01:08:07 ~-~-> 01:08:14 |really moving, the Dow should be moving in sympathy with the ES and NASDAQ. But | ||
683 | |682 |01:08:14 ~-~-> 01:08:18 |if in the morning session, we open up and it starts doing like it did this | ||
684 | |683 |01:08:18 ~-~-> 01:08:23 |morning, that means I already know that I'm going to have visibility issues with | ||
685 | |684 |01:08:23 ~-~-> 01:08:27 |the precision, so then I have to go back to okay. That means that we're | ||
686 | |685 |01:08:27 ~-~-> 01:08:32 |decoupled. So at some point later on in the session, there's going to be a SMT | ||
687 | |686 |01:08:32 ~-~-> 01:08:36 |divergence, and they're going to go back in sync. The Dallas is simply telling | ||
688 | |687 |01:08:36 ~-~-> 01:08:41 |me, No, we're not going down there right now. So I'm going to be looking for | ||
689 | |688 |01:08:41 ~-~-> 01:08:45 |what. I'm going to be looking for the s, p, because this one's going to be fuzzy | ||
690 | |689 |01:08:45 ~-~-> 01:08:48 |compared to the obvious imbalances and stuff that we saw over here that I | ||
691 | |690 |01:08:48 ~-~-> 01:08:52 |haven't you can see the price is reacting off of we're seeing a lot of | ||
692 | |691 |01:08:52 ~-~-> 01:08:57 |overlapping in here. I mean, let me magnify this one again. We're seeing a | ||
693 | |692 |01:08:57 ~-~-> 01:09:06 |lot of the give and take, back and forth delivery of price here, every | ||
694 | |693 |01:09:06 ~-~-> 01:09:10 |candlestick, the range keeps overlapping with the previous one. There's a lot of | ||
695 | |694 |01:09:10 ~-~-> 01:09:14 |revisiting on the same prices. So this is like fuzzy type of price action | ||
696 | |695 |01:09:14 ~-~-> 01:09:24 |compared to see how much more nice and refined every little range we were able | ||
697 | |696 |01:09:24 ~-~-> 01:09:27 |to see the bearish fair value gap here, the change in the state of liquidity, | ||
698 | |697 |01:09:27 ~-~-> 01:09:31 |bang hits it. The body stayed inside. The volume imbalance here, we have a | ||
699 | |698 |01:09:31 ~-~-> 01:09:34 |volume imbalance here, the body starts in there and leaves. It doesn't come | ||
700 | |699 |01:09:34 ~-~-> 01:09:37 |back up into it. That's weakness. Drops down. I told you this is gonna be an | ||
701 | |700 |01:09:37 ~-~-> 01:09:40 |inversion fair value gap, but I also said it may not even come back down and | ||
702 | |701 |01:09:40 ~-~-> 01:09:44 |touch it. And I told you how to use that inversion fair value gap as an entry, | ||
703 | |702 |01:09:44 ~-~-> 01:09:47 |how I would use it, and how I use it to make sure I get into the tree, because I | ||
704 | |703 |01:09:47 ~-~-> 01:09:51 |may not get that what, which didn't come the return and reprice back down into | ||
705 | |704 |01:09:51 ~-~-> 01:09:55 |it. Now I told you I want to see that fair value gap stay open. That would be | ||
706 | |705 |01:09:55 ~-~-> 01:09:57 |a breakaway gap, and it would take us right back up into what is this? Oh, | ||
707 | |706 |01:09:57 ~-~-> 01:10:00 |look at the bodies here, respecting the first with. It's a fair Vegas. That's | ||
708 | |707 |01:10:00 ~-~-> 01:10:06 |completely random, isn't it? No, it's fucking coded to do that. Hello. You | ||
709 | |708 |01:10:06 ~-~-> 01:10:09 |think it's fine. And selling pressure, it's unbelievable. It's literally | ||
710 | |709 |01:10:09 ~-~-> 01:10:13 |unbelievable. The volume imbalance I annotated over here because this is all | ||
711 | |710 |01:10:13 ~-~-> 01:10:18 |part of what what is this? What is this right here? Market Maker buy model. Does | ||
712 | |711 |01:10:18 ~-~-> 01:10:21 |the market maker buy model have to come back up and clear out the original | ||
713 | |712 |01:10:21 ~-~-> 01:10:28 |consolidation. No, no, it doesn't. It does not have to do that, but you have | ||
714 | |713 |01:10:28 ~-~-> 01:10:34 |to know where it's going to draw to, and you were told that. So the volume | ||
715 | |714 |01:10:34 ~-~-> 01:10:38 |balance here, it trades above it comes back down a little tiny little bit | ||
716 | |715 |01:10:38 ~-~-> 01:10:41 |outside of it, comes right to the top of it, and then sends it right into the | ||
717 | |716 |01:10:41 ~-~-> 01:10:44 |promised land. The first presented fair value got that's always been in your | ||
718 | |717 |01:10:44 ~-~-> 01:10:48 |charts, but you've never noticed it. Why? Because Wyckoff didn't teach that. | ||
719 | |718 |01:10:48 ~-~-> 01:10:52 |Because Elliot. We've never even heard of it. Pitchforks, don't even get me | ||
720 | |719 |01:10:52 ~-~-> 01:10:55 |fucking started. I stuck a pitchfork in the market's ass today, right in front | ||
721 | |720 |01:10:55 ~-~-> 01:11:00 |of all of you. It literally was laid out in front of you perfectly in a hard | ||
722 | |721 |01:11:00 ~-~-> 01:11:04 |market environment where everybody else out there is going to be scratching our | ||
723 | |722 |01:11:04 ~-~-> 01:11:09 |head saying, wow, you know, I'm trying to trade. Es, is a mess. Oh, wow. I'm | ||
724 | |723 |01:11:09 ~-~-> 01:11:11 |trying to trade. Dow, what the hell's going on here? Is this thing? This is | ||
725 | |724 |01:11:11 ~-~-> 01:11:16 |going all her place, the mess. It's a mess. And maybe you were in the NASDAQ, | ||
726 | |725 |01:11:16 ~-~-> 01:11:21 |maybe you were, maybe you were trying to trade short on this first percent of | ||
727 | |726 |01:11:21 ~-~-> 01:11:24 |everybody. I think you're scratching your head thinking, Oh, they changed the | ||
728 | |727 |01:11:24 ~-~-> 01:11:28 |algorithm. Does it sound like I changed a fucking thing today? No, nope. Didn't | ||
729 | |728 |01:11:28 ~-~-> 01:11:32 |change anything. Everything's the same way. It's going to be the same way until | ||
730 | |729 |01:11:32 ~-~-> 01:11:35 |these markets no longer exist and you're not allowed to trade in them, you're | ||
731 | |730 |01:11:35 ~-~-> 01:11:39 |going to see these things in effect, period. This is the way it is. You don't | ||
732 | |731 |01:11:39 ~-~-> 01:11:43 |have to believe me. It's actually better if you don't. This just means there's an | ||
733 | |732 |01:11:43 ~-~-> 01:11:46 |supply of liquidity, because that means you're going to be on the other side of | ||
734 | |733 |01:11:46 ~-~-> 01:11:50 |my fucking trades. You're going to be on another side of my students trades. | ||
735 | |734 |01:11:50 ~-~-> 01:11:53 |Either you're you're there in the tree the train of thought that I'm teaching, | ||
736 | |735 |01:11:53 ~-~-> 01:11:57 |and you're not being cannibalized, then you're not going to fall victim to this | ||
737 | |736 |01:11:57 ~-~-> 01:12:00 |stuff. You're not going to be tricked and deceived by price action. And | ||
738 | |737 |01:12:00 ~-~-> 01:12:04 |thinking about the market runs off of bull flags and bear flags and cup and | ||
739 | |738 |01:12:04 ~-~-> 01:12:07 |handle patterns, and that's horseshit. All that stuff is nonsense. It's | ||
740 | |739 |01:12:07 ~-~-> 01:12:11 |literally nonsense. And the sooner you come to the realization that these | ||
741 | |740 |01:12:11 ~-~-> 01:12:15 |markets are fucking rigged, and they're to the tick rigged, and it's time based | ||
742 | |741 |01:12:15 ~-~-> 01:12:19 |delivery, the sooner you're going to be to where you're trying to be, which is | ||
743 | |742 |01:12:19 ~-~-> 01:12:25 |consistently finding setups that yield profitability. But that's a huge leap | ||
744 | |743 |01:12:25 ~-~-> 01:12:29 |from your first endeavor of trying to learn how to do this, whether it be with | ||
745 | |744 |01:12:29 ~-~-> 01:12:32 |me or someone else, to getting to that point because you have all these things | ||
746 | |745 |01:12:32 ~-~-> 01:12:37 |in your head that you're rushing to try to get done. I want to be profitable | ||
747 | |746 |01:12:37 ~-~-> 01:12:40 |right now. You can't be profitable right now. You have to learn how to fix | ||
748 | |747 |01:12:40 ~-~-> 01:12:40 |yourself | ||
749 | |748 |01:12:42 ~-~-> 01:12:46 |and in a day like today, this is a complex day for someone that doesn't | ||
750 | |749 |01:12:46 ~-~-> 01:12:50 |have a trade, it's very difficult, and I have no shame in saying that it's a more | ||
751 | |750 |01:12:50 ~-~-> 01:12:53 |difficult day. But obviously you can see what I'm talking about is happening in a | ||
752 | |751 |01:12:53 ~-~-> 01:12:57 |chart as it happened in real time, in a one minute basis. So it's not that I | ||
753 | |752 |01:12:57 ~-~-> 01:13:01 |don't know what I'm doing, but I'm agreeing with you if you feel that the | ||
754 | |753 |01:13:01 ~-~-> 01:13:06 |adversities in environments like this, because it makes you feel like you're | ||
755 | |754 |01:13:06 ~-~-> 01:13:10 |you're somehow ill equipped mentally, or you don't have the capacity to learn how | ||
756 | |755 |01:13:10 ~-~-> 01:13:13 |to do it, because the the market feels like it's always beating you down. It's | ||
757 | |756 |01:13:13 ~-~-> 01:13:18 |just you're trying to force something in an economic climate that we're in front | ||
758 | |757 |01:13:18 ~-~-> 01:13:22 |of an election that's historic. There's a whole lot of corruption everywhere. | ||
759 | |758 |01:13:22 ~-~-> 01:13:25 |The markets are absolutely rigged, and they're doing a lot of things right now. | ||
760 | |759 |01:13:25 ~-~-> 01:13:31 |In the last three years, they've never done before. They've never done these | ||
761 | |760 |01:13:31 ~-~-> 01:13:36 |types of wild whipsaw, but then getting right back in the sink again, there's a | ||
762 | |761 |01:13:36 ~-~-> 01:13:41 |whole lot of hand involvement in this. Okay? And if you've had a lot of | ||
763 | |762 |01:13:41 ~-~-> 01:13:46 |difficulty in the last year or so, or you've made lots of money, but you just | ||
764 | |763 |01:13:46 ~-~-> 01:13:51 |barely made some money, it's not technically your fault. It's not | ||
765 | |764 |01:13:51 ~-~-> 01:14:02 |technically your fault. And if you can just accept the fact that you can learn | ||
766 | |765 |01:14:02 ~-~-> 01:14:07 |this given enough time, as long as you don't force it too fast. If you're not | ||
767 | |766 |01:14:07 ~-~-> 01:14:15 |trying to be correct about everything, you stand a better chance than you | ||
768 | |767 |01:14:15 ~-~-> 01:14:21 |probably giving yourself the scheduled destination goal that you've created for | ||
769 | |768 |01:14:21 ~-~-> 01:14:25 |yourself, because you have a time that you want to be profitable, and you can't | ||
770 | |769 |01:14:25 ~-~-> 01:14:29 |do that, because as soon as you set a date that you this is the day I'm going | ||
771 | |770 |01:14:29 ~-~-> 01:14:32 |to quit my job, because I did that stuff. I did that I have so many | ||
772 | |771 |01:14:32 ~-~-> 01:14:36 |deadline dates that I was going to quit my job, and I had to keep pushing that | ||
773 | |772 |01:14:36 ~-~-> 01:14:39 |date further in the future because I was setting a date that I was going to quit | ||
774 | |773 |01:14:39 ~-~-> 01:14:45 |my job. And when it came to I don't care about that, I need to learn how to do | ||
775 | |774 |01:14:45 ~-~-> 01:14:48 |this and know that I'm comfortable knowing what it's going to happen in the | ||
776 | |775 |01:14:48 ~-~-> 01:14:53 |marketplace. And then I can, if I could see it, if I could create these | ||
777 | |776 |01:14:53 ~-~-> 01:14:58 |advantages that are going to be outside the scope and reach of everyone else. | ||
778 | |777 |01:14:59 ~-~-> 01:15:05 |Then. It, then it's a lock. I'll know it when I know it. And that's the same | ||
779 | |778 |01:15:05 ~-~-> 01:15:08 |thing for you. It's the same thing with when you want to trade with real money, | ||
780 | |779 |01:15:08 ~-~-> 01:15:12 |when you when you migrate from a demo account to live trading with real money. | ||
781 | |780 |01:15:14 ~-~-> 01:15:18 |I don't know that for you, but you're going to know it when you can sit out in | ||
782 | |781 |01:15:18 ~-~-> 01:15:22 |front of a chart, not in front of me like or anyone else like I'm doing here. | ||
783 | |782 |01:15:22 ~-~-> 01:15:25 |That's not necessity. But when you sit in front of the charts and you can see | ||
784 | |783 |01:15:25 ~-~-> 01:15:29 |what it's going to do, and you're not swayed. You're not You're not feeling | ||
785 | |784 |01:15:29 ~-~-> 01:15:32 |impulsive that I have to get in this trade, because I feel like I'm going to | ||
786 | |785 |01:15:32 ~-~-> 01:15:37 |be right. And I need that scratched itch. I need to feel good about | ||
787 | |786 |01:15:37 ~-~-> 01:15:40 |something when you're when you're no longer replacing something that you're | ||
788 | |787 |01:15:40 ~-~-> 01:15:45 |feeling in your job, your personal life, your relationship, that void of | ||
789 | |788 |01:15:45 ~-~-> 01:15:50 |discomfort or unpleasantness or lack of happiness, if you're not looking for | ||
790 | |789 |01:15:50 ~-~-> 01:15:54 |your trades to reward or fill in that place in your life, and you're | ||
791 | |790 |01:15:55 ~-~-> 01:15:59 |consistently able to see what Christ is going to do when you're not being swayed | ||
792 | |791 |01:15:59 ~-~-> 01:16:05 |from outward influences, me, anyone else online, anything, but you can still see | ||
793 | |792 |01:16:05 ~-~-> 01:16:08 |what price is going to do, and you know how to enter it and where your stock | ||
794 | |793 |01:16:08 ~-~-> 01:16:12 |would be, and you have no emotional stimuli around the outcome of it. That | ||
795 | |794 |01:16:12 ~-~-> 01:16:16 |is the surest way to know that you're ready for trading with real money, | ||
796 | |795 |01:16:16 ~-~-> 01:16:21 |because if you trade any time prior to that, I promise you, you started too | ||
797 | |796 |01:16:21 ~-~-> 01:16:24 |soon, and you're probably going to blow your account, or you're going to have a | ||
798 | |797 |01:16:24 ~-~-> 01:16:27 |whole lot of drawdown, and then you're going to create scar tissue, and that | ||
799 | |798 |01:16:27 ~-~-> 01:16:32 |makes it so much harder to do it with real money. I made those mistakes in | ||
800 | |799 |01:16:32 ~-~-> 01:16:37 |1992 I started literally a month after reading a book. That book was not even | ||
801 | |800 |01:16:37 ~-~-> 01:16:43 |good, and I blew out half my account in the first trade, it was an option trade | ||
802 | |801 |01:16:43 ~-~-> 01:16:46 |in orange juice. And a lot of you know the story, but that created such a fear. | ||
803 | |802 |01:16:48 ~-~-> 01:16:52 |And I'm teaching you in this mentorship the same way I'm teaching my son is to | ||
804 | |803 |01:16:52 ~-~-> 01:16:57 |sit out here and engage price action with no monetary link to it, none | ||
805 | |804 |01:16:57 ~-~-> 01:17:03 |whatsoever, none. He tried it again. He failed his top step. He got it, he | ||
806 | |805 |01:17:03 ~-~-> 01:17:10 |passed it, but he lost it. Because he's trying to do before he should simply | ||
807 | |806 |01:17:10 ~-~-> 01:17:16 |learn how to do it. All he's doing is confirming how I'm teaching is the | ||
808 | |807 |01:17:16 ~-~-> 01:17:21 |correct way in this mentorship, the making money part, that's the easy part, | ||
809 | |808 |01:17:21 ~-~-> 01:17:27 |but that you have to arrive at the right mindset, and if you force trying to be | ||
810 | |809 |01:17:27 ~-~-> 01:17:32 |profitable before you're even equipped mentally to be able to do it, you got to | ||
811 | |810 |01:17:32 ~-~-> 01:17:37 |be able to say no a lot more than saying yes to a trade. And you'll never hear a | ||
812 | |811 |01:17:37 ~-~-> 01:17:42 |teacher or author of a book say that. There has to be more instances where | ||
813 | |812 |01:17:42 ~-~-> 01:17:46 |you'll say, as an analyst and trader, no, I'm not interested. Even though you | ||
814 | |813 |01:17:46 ~-~-> 01:17:50 |can sit there and say it's going to go here, it's like, it's most likely not | ||
815 | |814 |01:17:50 ~-~-> 01:17:53 |going to go here, but it's going to go here. But no, I'm not entering that | ||
816 | |815 |01:17:53 ~-~-> 01:18:00 |trade to to a new student or to a jack leg online. That sounds asinine, that | ||
817 | |816 |01:18:00 ~-~-> 01:18:02 |sounds counterintuitive. It's like, Well, who would, who would do that? | ||
818 | |817 |01:18:02 ~-~-> 01:18:07 |That's someone that's unprofitable, talking like that, but someone that says | ||
819 | |818 |01:18:07 ~-~-> 01:18:13 |no frequently and says yes to high probability conditions and setups. | ||
820 | |819 |01:18:13 ~-~-> 01:18:16 |That's a person that's going to have a long, long career. It's going to have | ||
821 | |820 |01:18:16 ~-~-> 01:18:19 |longevity, it's going to be consistently profitable. They're going to have losing | ||
822 | |821 |01:18:19 ~-~-> 01:18:22 |trades, but they're losing trades are not going to cause them to cause them to | ||
823 | |822 |01:18:22 ~-~-> 01:18:27 |tail spin and go into full tilt and blow their account. That's that's the | ||
824 | |823 |01:18:27 ~-~-> 01:18:31 |characteristics that that make a stark contrast between someone that simply | ||
825 | |824 |01:18:31 ~-~-> 01:18:34 |says, I'm a trader, I've made money. Look at this, but they're only showing | ||
826 | |825 |01:18:34 ~-~-> 01:18:38 |you those instances where it's worked. They're not showing you that they've | ||
827 | |826 |01:18:38 ~-~-> 01:18:43 |never had any profitability the rest of the time that week, they're only showing | ||
828 | |827 |01:18:43 ~-~-> 01:18:47 |you those little, those single hits, here it is, here it is, here it is. And | ||
829 | |828 |01:18:47 ~-~-> 01:18:50 |they're hiding, and, you know, avoiding all that stuff. You know who they are | ||
830 | |829 |01:18:50 ~-~-> 01:18:53 |for people to show screenshots after fact, they don't even have a stop loss | ||
831 | |830 |01:18:53 ~-~-> 01:19:01 |in there. Come on, we're past all that. Now. We're past all that. I'm so happy | ||
832 | |831 |01:19:02 ~-~-> 01:19:07 |to be a mentor that is encouraged other people to record their trades with a | ||
833 | |832 |01:19:07 ~-~-> 01:19:13 |stop loss and managing it. And if you can tell who's learned from me, it's | ||
834 | |833 |01:19:13 ~-~-> 01:19:17 |like a badge of honor for me to see people on the internet and they're | ||
835 | |834 |01:19:17 ~-~-> 01:19:20 |recording their trades. I don't they don't need to have anything annotated | ||
836 | |835 |01:19:20 ~-~-> 01:19:22 |their chart. I already know they're my student. I already know how they're | ||
837 | |836 |01:19:22 ~-~-> 01:19:26 |entering, how the fact that they're even recording it, and the things that | ||
838 | |837 |01:19:26 ~-~-> 01:19:30 |they're pointing to as where it's going to go to next. It's a dead giveaway. | ||
839 | |838 |01:19:31 ~-~-> 01:19:35 |It's a dead giveaway. And I'm so glad that it's my students that bring that. | ||
840 | |839 |01:19:36 ~-~-> 01:19:39 |You don't see all these other people in these school of thoughts doing that. | ||
841 | |840 |01:19:39 ~-~-> 01:19:44 |It's an ICT characteristic. It's a thing that's rubbed off. It's in your it's in | ||
842 | |841 |01:19:44 ~-~-> 01:19:49 |your DNA. Daddy gave that to you. Okay, well, we can walk out there and prove | ||
843 | |842 |01:19:49 ~-~-> 01:19:51 |that we can manage the trade from beginning to end with the stop loss, | ||
844 | |843 |01:19:51 ~-~-> 01:19:57 |over and over and over and over and over and over, every single day it's going to | ||
845 | |844 |01:19:57 ~-~-> 01:20:02 |be there. Every single week, it's going to be there. It. But in the beginning, | ||
846 | |845 |01:20:02 ~-~-> 01:20:07 |they're not all for you. They're all learning opportunities. They're all for | ||
847 | |846 |01:20:07 ~-~-> 01:20:11 |your edification and your learning. But in the future, you're going to see that | ||
848 | |847 |01:20:11 ~-~-> 01:20:14 |there's going to be a whole lot less trades that you're going to be taking. | ||
849 | |848 |01:20:15 ~-~-> 01:20:19 |So you think that I'm taking 1000s of trades in a month, I'm not. I'm not | ||
850 | |849 |01:20:19 ~-~-> 01:20:24 |doing that. I'm looking for the ones that are just the easy, slow ride in | ||
851 | |850 |01:20:25 ~-~-> 01:20:29 |with no adversities. It's low resistance, liquidity runs. I don't have | ||
852 | |851 |01:20:29 ~-~-> 01:20:33 |any static, no friction. It's just a slide on it. There it is. Thank you. | ||
853 | |852 |01:20:35 ~-~-> 01:20:39 |That's what you want as a trader. But I had no one to find that for me when I | ||
854 | |853 |01:20:39 ~-~-> 01:20:45 |was first starting in 1992 like I didn't have that. I had Larry Williams telling | ||
855 | |854 |01:20:45 ~-~-> 01:20:49 |me to watch accumulation distribution. Williams persona article oversold, and | ||
856 | |855 |01:20:49 ~-~-> 01:20:54 |look for, you know, swing highs and swing lows. That was that was it an open | ||
857 | |856 |01:20:54 ~-~-> 01:20:58 |interest declining when we're in consolidation. So if there's a premium | ||
858 | |857 |01:20:58 ~-~-> 01:21:02 |between the nearby contract and the next month out, then it's probably going to | ||
859 | |858 |01:21:02 ~-~-> 01:21:05 |be a commercial bull market. And I was spending my time looking for that stuff, | ||
860 | |859 |01:21:05 ~-~-> 01:21:08 |and all that stuff works if you're working on a daily chart. But I don't | ||
861 | |860 |01:21:08 ~-~-> 01:21:12 |trade on a daily chart. I trade intraday charts because I want to be in there | ||
862 | |861 |01:21:12 ~-~-> 01:21:19 |using velocity. If I go in there and take a trade on that is meant to hold | ||
863 | |862 |01:21:19 ~-~-> 01:21:23 |for three months, six months, how much can I really get out of that move? | ||
864 | |863 |01:21:24 ~-~-> 01:21:30 |Like I can't really, I can't really do much more than what it's offering, | ||
865 | |864 |01:21:31 ~-~-> 01:21:33 |because at some point you can over leverage to the point where you can't | ||
866 | |865 |01:21:33 ~-~-> 01:21:39 |afford to trade any more contracts. And I'm not a fan of new equity building in | ||
867 | |866 |01:21:39 ~-~-> 01:21:47 |pyramid positions in that too. I hurt myself doing it in the 90s. So here in | ||
868 | |867 |01:21:47 ~-~-> 01:21:52 |lower time frames, I can roll an account over and over and over again with | ||
869 | |868 |01:21:52 ~-~-> 01:21:56 |multiple setups and the velocity of using new setups, with new gearing, | ||
870 | |869 |01:21:56 ~-~-> 01:22:02 |using the new equity at a new trade entry, that velocity can parlay the | ||
871 | |870 |01:22:02 ~-~-> 01:22:05 |account up faster when these other people out there are holding on, these | ||
872 | |871 |01:22:05 ~-~-> 01:22:09 |hodlers, these hold on for dear life people, that doesn't make any damn sense | ||
873 | |872 |01:22:09 ~-~-> 01:22:14 |to me. Okay? Because if you know how to trade, you can go into any given time | ||
874 | |873 |01:22:14 ~-~-> 01:22:19 |frame and roll, enroll and roll, and continuously build up, build up, build | ||
875 | |874 |01:22:19 ~-~-> 01:22:23 |up, with new positions, and as you make new equity, you're never risking any | ||
876 | |875 |01:22:23 ~-~-> 01:22:27 |more than your fixed percentage of risk. So if you have adopted a 1% risk model, | ||
877 | |876 |01:22:27 ~-~-> 01:22:32 |that means every trade you take doesn't go over 1% as you make more equity, you | ||
878 | |877 |01:22:32 ~-~-> 01:22:37 |can afford to control more contracts or lots if you're trading with Forex. So | ||
879 | |878 |01:22:37 ~-~-> 01:22:41 |the risk is never increasing percentage wise, but because your equity is | ||
880 | |879 |01:22:41 ~-~-> 01:22:48 |increasing and your ability to allow velocity in the acceleration of the | ||
881 | |880 |01:22:49 ~-~-> 01:22:53 |equity growth, that's what intraday trading, and that's why high frequency | ||
882 | |881 |01:22:53 ~-~-> 01:22:59 |trading is the mechanism of these entities. That's what they do. They | ||
883 | |882 |01:22:59 ~-~-> 01:23:02 |don't go out there and buy and hold for long periods of time. That's not what | ||
884 | |883 |01:23:02 ~-~-> 01:23:07 |they do. They work inside these fluctuations like this. That's what a | ||
885 | |884 |01:23:07 ~-~-> 01:23:10 |high frequency trading algorithm does. It's buying and selling all day long, | ||
886 | |885 |01:23:11 ~-~-> 01:23:16 |but it's using a lot of the things that I'm showing you here, and they repeat | ||
887 | |886 |01:23:16 ~-~-> 01:23:21 |over and over and over again. And I would love to talk to you two more, but | ||
888 | |887 |01:23:21 ~-~-> 01:23:26 |I gave you another. What's that? 22 minutes more than I should have, but | ||
889 | |888 |01:23:26 ~-~-> 01:23:30 |it's extra, and I didn't have to charge you for it. So I'm going to close this | ||
890 | |889 |01:23:30 ~-~-> 01:23:33 |one here. I've had a lot of fun sitting down with you today. I hope you learned | ||
891 | |890 |01:23:33 ~-~-> 01:23:36 |something. I hope it was able to guide you through this morning. Hope you | ||
892 | |891 |01:23:36 ~-~-> 01:23:40 |didn't hurt yourself and it came away with some more insights. If you like | ||
893 | |892 |01:23:40 ~-~-> 01:23:43 |what you learned today, I appreciate it. Give it a thumbs up. It doesn't cost you | ||
894 | |893 |01:23:43 ~-~-> 01:23:47 |anything. Doesn't make me any more money or make any less money. But if you like | ||
895 | |894 |01:23:47 ~-~-> 01:23:51 |these kind of lectures, it's a way for you to sound off and say, you know, I'm | ||
896 | |895 |01:23:51 ~-~-> 01:23:54 |paying attention. ICT, I heard what you said today. I watched it unfold today, | ||
897 | |896 |01:23:54 ~-~-> 01:23:57 |and I was a witness to it. So until I'll talk to you next time, I don't know if | ||
898 | |897 |01:23:57 ~-~-> 01:24:00 |it'll be tomorrow morning. Let me just say that right now I don't know if I'm | ||
899 | |898 |01:24:00 ~-~-> 01:24:03 |going to do an afternoon session or if it's an am session, so So grant me a | ||
900 | |899 |01:24:03 ~-~-> 01:24:09 |little bit of flexibility. I'll let you know early on tomorrow, probably like | ||
901 | |900 |01:24:09 ~-~-> 01:24:12 |730 or so, if I'm going to be live streaming the morning session or the | ||
902 | |901 |01:24:12 ~-~-> 01:24:16 |afternoon I have to determine what my personal schedule is going to be like | ||
903 | |902 |01:24:16 ~-~-> 01:24:20 |tomorrow, because there's something I have to get done, and if I can get it | ||
904 | |903 |01:24:20 ~-~-> 01:24:23 |done today, I'll be able to trade tomorrow or live stream in front of me, | ||
905 | |904 |01:24:23 ~-~-> 01:24:27 |rather. And then if I can't get it done today, then I'm going to be doing that | ||
906 | |905 |01:24:27 ~-~-> 01:24:31 |tomorrow morning. That would prevent me from being in live streaming the morning | ||
907 | |906 |01:24:31 ~-~-> 01:24:35 |session. I would then defer to the afternoon, so we'll have to play it by | ||
908 | |907 |01:24:35 ~-~-> 01:24:40 |ear. So just afford me that. That that much latitude here. So until I talk to | ||
909 | |908 |01:24:40 ~-~-> 01:24:42 |you, then, Lord willing be safe you. |