Wiki source code of ICT YT - 2024-06-24 - NQ Turtle Soup Short
Last modified by Drunk Monkey on 2024-08-07 10:37
Show last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
1 | {{box cssClass="box floatinginfobox" title="**Quick Links**"}} | ||
2 | {{toc depth="2" numbered="true" start="2"/}} | ||
3 | {{/box}} | ||
4 | |||
5 | == Outline == | ||
6 | |||
7 | ##00:02 -## Trading NASDAQ with potential inversion fair value gap. | ||
8 | |||
9 | - ICT expects NASDAQ to drop, aims to sell short at 8:30 AM ET. | ||
10 | - ICT identifies potential short entry opportunity near 7:50am. | ||
11 | - ICT identifies inversion fair value gap, annotates with gradients. | ||
12 | |||
13 | ##07:28 -## Trading strategies and market analysis. | ||
14 | |||
15 | - ICT explains the concept of quadrants in trading, including the upper and lower quadrants, and how they relate to price action. | ||
16 | - ICT identifies potential trading opportunities based on the algorithm's behavior inside the upper and lower quadrants. | ||
17 | - ICT is focusing on a low at 926 and wants to see the price stay inside that range. | ||
18 | - ICT wants to see the price fall into the low at 926 without returning to its wick. | ||
19 | - ICT warns of scammers pretending to be him on Instagram. | ||
20 | |||
21 | == Transcription == | ||
22 | |||
23 | (% class="hover min" %) | ||
24 | |1 |00:00:02,160 ~-~-> 00:00:09,660 |Well, good morning, folks. How are you long time? No see. So I've been under | ||
25 | |2 |00:00:09,660 ~-~-> 00:00:16,020 |the weather of sorts. Not sure how to explain it, other than I believe it has | ||
26 | |3 |00:00:16,020 ~-~-> 00:00:23,600 |something to do with blood sugar. I've had some issues with my vision and | ||
27 | |4 |00:00:23,600 ~-~-> 00:00:34,820 |dizziness and just oh, I'm not doing well, but I'm working on it. So looking | ||
28 | |5 |00:00:34,820 ~-~-> 00:00:44,620 |at the NASDAQ here, I like the idea of the NASDAQ trading down for a little | ||
29 | |6 |00:00:44,620 ~-~-> 00:00:53,020 |while, that buy side looks safe, that sell side imbalance I'm noting here, I | ||
30 | |7 |00:00:53,020 ~-~-> 00:00:58,180 |want to see it stay below the midpoint, and I'm willing to take a short in here | ||
31 | |8 |00:00:58,180 ~-~-> 00:01:05,700 |and aim for the low form just after eight o'clock in the morning. | ||
32 | |9 |00:01:09,300 ~-~-> 00:01:10,200 |So | ||
33 | |10 |00:01:14,280 ~-~-> 00:01:19,380 |I see several things in here, inversion, pit, value gap that could happen. This | ||
34 | |11 |00:01:19,380 ~-~-> 00:01:22,340 |is the low, | ||
35 | |12 |00:01:29,360 ~-~-> 00:01:33,980 |8:30am Eastern Time. | ||
36 | |13 |00:01:40,340 ~-~-> 00:01:43,720 |This black and this black, | ||
37 | |14 |00:01:45,880 ~-~-> 00:01:50,140 |all right, so that's the initial draw. So I'm expecting it to go there, but I'd | ||
38 | |15 |00:01:50,140 ~-~-> 00:01:55,420 |like to see it go lower. I like 760 as a enemy, eternal swing. So we're going to | ||
39 | |16 |00:01:55,420 ~-~-> 00:02:02,640 |sell short here. I'll put the stop loss right there at the high. I don't think | ||
40 | |17 |00:02:02,640 ~-~-> 00:02:06,240 |that consequent encouragement is going to | ||
41 | |18 |00:02:08,880 ~-~-> 00:02:22,640 |be a factor for this. I'll add some more in here. Okay, and I'll get that off of | ||
42 | |19 |00:02:22,640 ~-~-> 00:02:23,000 |there. | ||
43 | |20 |00:02:30,620 ~-~-> 00:02:36,260 |Now I'm watching that last up close candle, the big, bold, green one. My | ||
44 | |21 |00:02:36,260 ~-~-> 00:02:40,600 |eyes looking right to close that candlestick. And that's a rejection | ||
45 | |22 |00:02:40,600 ~-~-> 00:02:47,080 |block. If it can stab one more time up into that, I'll add just to prove the | ||
46 | |23 |00:02:48,040 ~-~-> 00:02:59,380 |method and concept. So we're looking for that decline around 7:50am near ton, I'm | ||
47 | |24 |00:03:00,000 ~-~-> 00:03:07,380 |it is a volume imbalance I'm going to add into that right there, | ||
48 | |25 |00:03:09,000 ~-~-> 00:03:11,640 |and it might | ||
49 | |26 |00:03:13,860 ~-~-> 00:03:20,780 |not get up into that rejection block, but If it does, I'll add me annotate | ||
50 | |27 |00:03:20,780 ~-~-> 00:03:28,280 |this volume imbalance for you. Now, volume and balance is the weakest in | ||
51 | |28 |00:03:28,280 ~-~-> 00:03:34,940 |terms of the flexibility on all my PD arrays, so I'm completely comfortable | ||
52 | |29 |00:03:35,540 ~-~-> 00:03:40,480 |with letting price go through them and then coming back to them as a i They | ||
53 | |30 |00:03:44,260 ~-~-> 00:03:47,200 |either target means of managing a stop loss. So | ||
54 | |31 |00:03:51,100 ~-~-> 00:03:54,280 |these things always get it where I want it. | ||
55 | |32 |00:03:55,540 ~-~-> 00:03:56,680 |It's never rare I want it. | ||
56 | |33 |00:04:02,920 ~-~-> 00:04:12,600 |I I wanted to thicken up here, come on. There you go. All right, so it could | ||
57 | |34 |00:04:12,600 ~-~-> 00:04:19,080 |bounce off this volume and bounce and if it can sweep to that last up close | ||
58 | |35 |00:04:19,080 ~-~-> 00:04:24,020 |candle, the biggest green one before it turned and rolled over here, I'll take | ||
59 | |36 |00:04:24,020 ~-~-> 00:04:31,820 |that as a an additional short entry, the stop loss is safe. So | ||
60 | |37 |00:04:35,000 ~-~-> 00:04:39,860 |just want to draw special attention to that | ||
61 | |38 |00:04:41,540 ~-~-> 00:04:48,820 |so I'm not fearful of adding that's the constant correction of the wick three | ||
62 | |39 |00:04:48,820 ~-~-> 00:04:52,060 |candles back, and there is | ||
63 | |40 |00:04:53,740 ~-~-> 00:04:56,380 |what looks like the rejection block, right | ||
64 | |41 |00:04:57,699 ~-~-> 00:05:01,619 |there. Yep, I got right there. I. So I'd like to see it turn right there on a | ||
65 | |42 |00:05:01,619 ~-~-> 00:05:04,919 |dime. If it's truly, in fact, a rejection block, it should, in fact, | ||
66 | |43 |00:05:05,219 ~-~-> 00:05:09,419 |drop and fall away from here and start gravitating towards that low I was | ||
67 | |44 |00:05:09,419 ~-~-> 00:05:10,139 |looking for. | ||
68 | |45 |00:05:17,220 ~-~-> 00:05:19,140 |Okay, so far so good. I'm | ||
69 | |46 |00:05:29,540 ~-~-> 00:05:33,260 |now this becomes a premium array, where if it trades away from it on the | ||
70 | |47 |00:05:33,260 ~-~-> 00:05:40,900 |downside, if it comes back up into it, it should act as resistance. Because now | ||
71 | |48 |00:05:40,900 ~-~-> 00:05:45,580 |the narratives in play, and there you go. Look at that. It's almost like | ||
72 | |49 |00:05:45,580 ~-~-> 00:05:50,860 |voodoo, all right. So I'm looking at the bottom balance outside of efficiency | ||
73 | |50 |00:05:51,160 ~-~-> 00:05:55,420 |that we're trading inside of, just to the left of where price is trading now. | ||
74 | |51 |00:05:56,020 ~-~-> 00:06:00,120 |And don't lose sight of that low down here, because that's where my focus is. | ||
75 | |52 |00:06:01,260 ~-~-> 00:06:05,340 |I'm not so much concerned about it ripping and, you know, reversing higher, | ||
76 | |53 |00:06:05,700 ~-~-> 00:06:11,820 |but I like the idea of taking some of the risk away here. And I want to see | ||
77 | |54 |00:06:11,820 ~-~-> 00:06:16,080 |that body side and imbalance, cell side and efficiency morph into a | ||
78 | |55 |00:06:19,139 ~-~-> 00:06:24,559 |just be a little facetious here no ICT video was complete without it, and | ||
79 | |56 |00:06:26,000 ~-~-> 00:06:31,100 |that botched and balanced cell sided efficiency, I want to see that act as a | ||
80 | |57 |00:06:31,100 ~-~-> 00:06:37,460 |inversion fair value gap. So inversion fair value gaps are typically shown in | ||
81 | |58 |00:06:37,460 ~-~-> 00:06:43,660 |my educational examples the teachings. I usually annotate them as an orange hued | ||
82 | |59 |00:06:44,140 ~-~-> 00:06:53,080 |rectangle. So while this here, see that candle is high, that candle is low, that | ||
83 | |60 |00:06:53,080 ~-~-> 00:06:59,680 |candle is high, that candle is low. The folks that think these are Lakota diva | ||
84 | |61 |00:06:59,680 ~-~-> 00:07:02,760 |woods, that they could just trade back down into them and go back up because | ||
85 | |62 |00:07:02,760 ~-~-> 00:07:05,820 |they don't know what's going on. They'll look at that as a reason go long and | ||
86 | |63 |00:07:05,820 ~-~-> 00:07:10,440 |they'll lose their shirt here. So what I'm showing you is that I'm viewing that | ||
87 | |64 |00:07:10,440 ~-~-> 00:07:13,800 |as an inversion fair value gap. And Chris Laurie doesn't teach that, by the | ||
88 | |65 |00:07:13,800 ~-~-> 00:07:20,840 |way, he might start doing it now, because mine works a lot better, but the | ||
89 | |66 |00:07:21,440 ~-~-> 00:07:28,460 |inversion fair value gap here, I want to annotate that and put gradients inside | ||
90 | |67 |00:07:28,460 ~-~-> 00:07:32,180 |of them. Okay, so what we're going to do is want to break them up into the upper | ||
91 | |68 |00:07:32,180 ~-~-> 00:07:37,820 |quadrant, consequent crochet, which is midpoint, and then there is the lower | ||
92 | |69 |00:07:37,820 ~-~-> 00:07:42,040 |quadrant, and then obviously the low of it. So let me show you that with the FIB | ||
93 | |70 |00:07:42,700 ~-~-> 00:07:45,760 |here. So that's normal, that's consequence encroachment. And here's the | ||
94 | |71 |00:07:45,760 ~-~-> 00:07:49,960 |FIB settings. You want to screenshot that. And now there's the quadrants | ||
95 | |72 |00:07:49,960 ~-~-> 00:07:53,560 |inside of that. This is not quarters theory, and quarters theory is a joke. | ||
96 | |73 |00:07:53,680 ~-~-> 00:07:57,400 |So stop asking me in the comment section. It's all a farce. Okay, it's | ||
97 | |74 |00:07:57,400 ~-~-> 00:08:01,320 |another gimmick. Watch and see what the difference is here. Okay, this is not | ||
98 | |75 |00:08:01,320 ~-~-> 00:08:05,400 |quarters theory. You'll never see anyone teaching this outside of me and my | ||
99 | |76 |00:08:05,400 ~-~-> 00:08:09,780 |lectures and anything. After I've taught it in mentorship. Then you see all these | ||
100 | |77 |00:08:09,780 ~-~-> 00:08:15,480 |little scribes and copycats. Let me copy this little William and balance in here. | ||
101 | |78 |00:08:15,480 ~-~-> 00:08:20,060 |I think we're gonna shoot up into that and hit the upper quadrant at most. I | ||
102 | |79 |00:08:20,060 ~-~-> 00:08:22,160 |don't want to see it close above the up quadrant. | ||
103 | |80 |00:08:24,560 ~-~-> 00:08:26,840 |Picking these up. Oh, there's the up quadrant. | ||
104 | |81 |00:08:28,879 ~-~-> 00:08:35,479 |I said that should be enough. Now, from a narrative standpoint, the algorithm | ||
105 | |82 |00:08:35,479 ~-~-> 00:08:40,659 |should start to spool lower, and there's a little short term low bring below, | ||
106 | |83 |00:08:42,879 ~-~-> 00:08:47,619 |right at 820 or so. That's also inside of another buy side, available time, | ||
107 | |84 |00:08:47,619 ~-~-> 00:08:51,399 |efficiency. I don't expect that to act as a inversion, fair Vega. I'd like to | ||
108 | |85 |00:08:51,399 ~-~-> 00:08:57,339 |see it melt right through that. So what I'm watching here is, does it want to | ||
109 | |86 |00:08:57,339 ~-~-> 00:09:03,599 |trade above the upper quadrant of that inversion? Fair Value. Here's the low I | ||
110 | |87 |00:09:03,599 ~-~-> 00:09:08,699 |was referring to. This is this is a minor sell side liquidity. So it's just | ||
111 | |88 |00:09:08,699 ~-~-> 00:09:14,999 |another factor to look for and study. Is price gravitating to this level. If I | ||
112 | |89 |00:09:14,999 ~-~-> 00:09:19,919 |was extremely insecure as a new developing student, I would look to take | ||
113 | |90 |00:09:19,919 ~-~-> 00:09:24,259 |a partial under this low but I've been around the block a few times, so I'm | ||
114 | |91 |00:09:25,699 ~-~-> 00:09:29,539 |going to hold for the target down here, because I have a longer term target I'm | ||
115 | |92 |00:09:29,539 ~-~-> 00:09:30,379 |trying to reach for. | ||
116 | |93 |00:09:35,480 ~-~-> 00:09:43,540 |Okay, so that's the that's the next gravitational draw on price. And if the | ||
117 | |94 |00:09:43,540 ~-~-> 00:09:47,500 |algorithm does exist, and it does want to go lower, that should just go right | ||
118 | |95 |00:09:47,500 ~-~-> 00:09:52,540 |down there and then accelerate through it, not just poke its tail in the water | ||
119 | |96 |00:09:52,540 ~-~-> 00:09:55,780 |and then go back up into the inversion fair value gap. I don't want to see that | ||
120 | |97 |00:09:55,780 ~-~-> 00:10:03,180 |it's already done the work inside the inversion fair value gap. You. So I want | ||
121 | |98 |00:10:03,180 ~-~-> 00:10:09,600 |to see some big, down, close candles, expansion lower. That'll confirm to me | ||
122 | |99 |00:10:09,600 ~-~-> 00:10:17,400 |that we will absolutely have no problem reaching the 926, level and little bit | ||
123 | |100 |00:10:17,400 ~-~-> 00:10:17,880 |lower. I'll, I'll | ||
124 | |101 |00:10:19,200 ~-~-> 00:10:20,600 |put a limit order below that. | ||
125 | |102 |00:10:24,320 ~-~-> 00:10:27,920 |Right now, I'm focusing on what we're seeing here, and that's beautiful. | ||
126 | |103 |00:10:27,920 ~-~-> 00:10:33,140 |That's exactly what we want to see. Now, spread its wings a little bit more. I | ||
127 | |104 |00:10:33,140 ~-~-> 00:10:33,860 |like that now. | ||
128 | |105 |00:10:35,120 ~-~-> 00:10:36,500 |So probably just got lucky, and | ||
129 | |106 |00:10:39,620 ~-~-> 00:10:43,000 |now you got to see the comment section. These guys love these little comments. | ||
130 | |107 |00:10:48,700 ~-~-> 00:10:52,780 |And just for the sake of answering, the folks that constantly leave little | ||
131 | |108 |00:10:52,780 ~-~-> 00:10:58,720 |comments and even messed up here, okay, that colors costs. And the reason why | ||
132 | |109 |00:10:58,720 ~-~-> 00:11:01,780 |you don't see comments, even though it looks like the comment sections open, is | ||
133 | |110 |00:11:01,780 ~-~-> 00:11:05,760 |open. It is open. It's just for me to read anyone that says, Why isn't there | ||
134 | |111 |00:11:05,760 ~-~-> 00:11:08,640 |any comments? I've banned those individuals so I'll never see your | ||
135 | |112 |00:11:08,640 ~-~-> 00:11:12,180 |comments again, and usually they're from people that aren't really subscribed to | ||
136 | |113 |00:11:12,180 ~-~-> 00:11:16,740 |the channel, so I could care less if I ever see your comment again. All right, | ||
137 | |114 |00:11:16,740 ~-~-> 00:11:21,920 |so we have a limit ordered. I want to move just a little bit lower so we have | ||
138 | |115 |00:11:22,340 ~-~-> 00:11:30,020 |15 scheduled to come off under that low. So far, everything just looks absolutely | ||
139 | |116 |00:11:30,260 ~-~-> 00:11:36,560 |gorgeous. Markets open, no Market Replay. They don't play that game right | ||
140 | |117 |00:11:36,560 ~-~-> 00:11:41,560 |here, I had a person asking, Can you move that thing, what are you hiding? | ||
141 | |118 |00:11:41,680 ~-~-> 00:11:45,520 |There's nothing over here. That's just the time thing. Okay, it's always New | ||
142 | |119 |00:11:45,520 ~-~-> 00:11:49,900 |York, and you can see the countdown to close on the price action for the | ||
143 | |120 |00:11:50,080 ~-~-> 00:11:58,180 |candlestick. So you can't do those things on Market Replay, all right, so | ||
144 | |121 |00:11:58,180 ~-~-> 00:12:01,200 |we're focusing on that low right there. | ||
145 | |122 |00:12:09,060 ~-~-> 00:12:17,280 |Now you see how we're going up into the most recent down closed candle. I want | ||
146 | |123 |00:12:17,280 ~-~-> 00:12:23,540 |to see it stay inside of that range. I don't want to see it go above the open | ||
147 | |124 |00:12:23,540 ~-~-> 00:12:30,920 |of it. So I want to focus primarily on heaviness. I want to see the price have | ||
148 | |125 |00:12:31,820 ~-~-> 00:12:39,440 |no strength overcoming the previous candles body. In other words, I don't | ||
149 | |126 |00:12:39,440 ~-~-> 00:12:43,360 |even want to see it return to its wick. To me, that would indicate that this is | ||
150 | |127 |00:12:43,360 ~-~-> 00:12:49,060 |absolutely going to roll over and smash through that low and it should have no | ||
151 | |128 |00:12:49,060 ~-~-> 00:12:56,500 |problem reaching low enough to get that in the order, small little fair value, | ||
152 | |129 |00:12:56,500 ~-~-> 00:13:01,080 |got it straight up into you see that here. So now with that, I absolutely | ||
153 | |130 |00:13:01,080 ~-~-> 00:13:05,340 |want to see it just fall out of bed and just careen into that low. | ||
154 | |131 |00:13:06,720 ~-~-> 00:13:09,780 |Or for the folks that aren't | ||
155 | |132 |00:13:11,160 ~-~-> 00:13:18,420 |English majors, I want to see it drop down fast, aggressive from where it is | ||
156 | |133 |00:13:18,420 ~-~-> 00:13:24,080 |right now, targeting that low that I have as an initial draw on liquidity | ||
157 | |134 |00:13:24,740 ~-~-> 00:13:30,140 |post, 8:30am Eastern Time as an audio reminder you're seeing. Obviously, on my | ||
158 | |135 |00:13:30,140 ~-~-> 00:13:35,660 |videos, there's a few scammers on Instagram. One has a large following | ||
159 | |136 |00:13:36,680 ~-~-> 00:13:40,960 |pretending to be me. I'm not on Instagram, and I'm not doing a paid | ||
160 | |137 |00:13:40,960 ~-~-> 00:13:45,400 |mentorship. So stop believing these jokers, and if you're giving them money, | ||
161 | |138 |00:13:45,520 ~-~-> 00:13:46,240 |you're an idiot. All | ||
162 | |139 |00:13:52,540 ~-~-> 00:13:55,300 |right, now think about what I was walking you through as we were trading | ||
163 | |140 |00:13:55,300 ~-~-> 00:14:04,500 |up at the highs. Okay, see that that is actually turtle soup, and I will be | ||
164 | |141 |00:14:04,500 ~-~-> 00:14:10,920 |teaching that in an upcoming lecture. It ain't the guy on Twitter teaching you | ||
165 | |142 |00:14:10,920 ~-~-> 00:14:16,260 |the secrets of turtle soup. And it's no, it's not when the rash version, either. | ||
166 | |143 |00:14:16,260 ~-~-> 00:14:22,820 |Everybody out here scrambling make a name for themselves on borrowed hand. Me | ||
167 | |144 |00:14:22,820 ~-~-> 00:14:28,580 |Down logic from good old ICT. So each is usually where we classically flirt with | ||
168 | |145 |00:14:28,580 ~-~-> 00:14:37,220 |it. So I'm gonna add my typical facetious little remark. It says, | ||
169 | |146 |00:14:37,220 ~-~-> 00:14:43,900 |prepare yourself for another random | ||
170 | |147 |00:14:45,160 ~-~-> 00:14:47,260 |act of precision. | ||
171 | |148 |00:14:52,420 ~-~-> 00:14:59,920 |Now we just sit here and wait. It's inevitable, right? | ||
172 | |149 |00:15:02,100 ~-~-> 00:15:03,900 |It's gonna get fucking all the time. | ||
173 | |150 |00:15:18,720 ~-~-> 00:15:21,200 |It should leave this candle or the next for sure, | ||
174 | |151 |00:15:26,480 ~-~-> 00:15:29,900 |looks heavy and | ||
175 | |152 |00:15:32,720 ~-~-> 00:15:40,960 |look at this, look at this guy. Go. All right, so now I'm going to show you what | ||
176 | |153 |00:15:40,960 ~-~-> 00:15:47,560 |I'm really aiming for. I might not get it, but now, because I've done fairly | ||
177 | |154 |00:15:47,560 ~-~-> 00:15:51,280 |well here, it doesn't matter if I, if I'm writing on this, I want to see it | ||
178 | |155 |00:15:51,280 ~-~-> 00:15:58,420 |trade down to 760 and just to make sure I can get a nice exit not to worry about | ||
179 | |156 |00:15:58,420 ~-~-> 00:16:02,280 |babysit it all day or tomorrow, if it needs to be I'll be just a little bit | ||
180 | |157 |00:16:02,280 ~-~-> 00:16:07,140 |above that, 760 Okay, send my letters about that. Everything else stays the | ||
181 | |158 |00:16:07,140 ~-~-> 00:16:12,060 |same. Hope you enjoyed it until talk to you next time. Be safe. Oh, by the way, | ||
182 | |159 |00:16:13,200 ~-~-> 00:16:15,780 |lectures are coming. Just be patient. You. |