Wiki source code of OTE Pattern Recognition Series - Vol 18.srt
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 00:00:09,929 ~-~-> 00:00:12,119 | ||
| 3 | ICT: Okay folks, welcome back. This is volume 18 and | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | 2 | ||
| 6 | 00:00:12,119 ~-~-> 00:00:15,449 | ||
| 7 | continuing series of 20 videos for the initial traders, | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | 3 | ||
| 10 | 00:00:15,659 ~-~-> 00:00:19,559 | ||
| 11 | optimal trade entry pattern recognition series. Alright, so | ||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | 4 | ||
| 14 | 00:00:19,559 ~-~-> 00:00:22,739 | ||
| 15 | our example today is from the treasury bond futures contract | ||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | 5 | ||
| 18 | 00:00:22,799 ~-~-> 00:00:27,119 | ||
| 19 | and the delivery contract month is September 2020. This at | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | 6 | ||
| 22 | 00:00:27,119 ~-~-> 00:00:30,449 | ||
| 23 | the time of this recording June 2 2020. The open interest is | ||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | 7 | ||
| 26 | 00:00:30,449 ~-~-> 00:00:34,169 | ||
| 27 | the highest in September contract, even though the nearby | ||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | 8 | ||
| 30 | 00:00:34,169 ~-~-> 00:00:40,049 | ||
| 31 | contract is June. So we're electing to follow this month for | ||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | 9 | ||
| 34 | 00:00:40,049 ~-~-> 00:00:43,199 | ||
| 35 | treasury bonds. And once you take a look at the daily chart, | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | 10 | ||
| 38 | 00:00:43,199 ~-~-> 00:00:46,409 | ||
| 39 | notice that we have this high to this low and we had a | ||
| 40 | |||
| 41 | 11 | ||
| 42 | 00:00:46,409 ~-~-> 00:00:49,589 | ||
| 43 | retracement in here and on the first of June we had a nice | ||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | 12 | ||
| 46 | 00:00:49,589 ~-~-> 00:00:53,009 | ||
| 47 | reaction in here. So is it more likely to take out this | ||
| 48 | |||
| 49 | 13 | ||
| 50 | 00:00:53,009 ~-~-> 00:00:57,509 | ||
| 51 | candles high or this candles low? Notice that we have a | ||
| 52 | |||
| 53 | 14 | ||
| 54 | 00:00:57,509 ~-~-> 00:01:00,929 | ||
| 55 | turning point here, a lower turning point here. And now we | ||
| 56 | |||
| 57 | 15 | ||
| 58 | 00:01:00,929 ~-~-> 00:01:07,859 | ||
| 59 | had a reaction within optimal trade entry. So is it likely | ||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | 16 | ||
| 62 | 00:01:07,859 ~-~-> 00:01:13,289 | ||
| 63 | to take the low out or the high out? Not the high, the low. | ||
| 64 | |||
| 65 | 17 | ||
| 66 | 00:01:14,189 ~-~-> 00:01:16,559 | ||
| 67 | And we have relative equal lows here as well. So that could | ||
| 68 | |||
| 69 | 18 | ||
| 70 | 00:01:16,559 ~-~-> 00:01:20,789 | ||
| 71 | be a potential target. So I'm going to take this off, and | ||
| 72 | |||
| 73 | 19 | ||
| 74 | 00:01:20,789 ~-~-> 00:01:28,319 | ||
| 75 | we're going to draw out the low here so when we drop down | ||
| 76 | |||
| 77 | 20 | ||
| 78 | 00:01:28,319 ~-~-> 00:01:31,199 | ||
| 79 | into the lower five minute chart, we'll be able to see the | ||
| 80 | |||
| 81 | 21 | ||
| 82 | 00:01:31,919 ~-~-> 00:01:35,789 | ||
| 83 | delineation of this particular day's low and it comes in at | ||
| 84 | |||
| 85 | 22 | ||
| 86 | 00:01:36,419 ~-~-> 00:01:40,919 | ||
| 87 | 177 and 230 seconds. So let's drop down to a five minute | ||
| 88 | |||
| 89 | 23 | ||
| 90 | 00:01:40,919 ~-~-> 00:01:43,889 | ||
| 91 | chart. Okay, so here is the five minute chart on the | ||
| 92 | |||
| 93 | 24 | ||
| 94 | 00:01:43,949 ~-~-> 00:01:48,089 | ||
| 95 | September contract for the treasury bond market. And you | ||
| 96 | |||
| 97 | 25 | ||
| 98 | 00:01:48,089 ~-~-> 00:01:51,089 | ||
| 99 | drill pause your video, study what you think you see here. | ||
| 100 | |||
| 101 | 26 | ||
| 102 | 00:01:57,990 ~-~-> 00:02:00,510 | ||
| 103 | Okay, so let's take the annotations in add them to the | ||
| 104 | |||
| 105 | 27 | ||
| 106 | 00:02:00,510 ~-~-> 00:02:06,780 | ||
| 107 | chart, New York session. And we have our high to low and | ||
| 108 | |||
| 109 | 28 | ||
| 110 | 00:02:06,780 ~-~-> 00:02:11,010 | ||
| 111 | retracement back into optimal trade entry. And this requires | ||
| 112 | |||
| 113 | 29 | ||
| 114 | 00:02:11,040 ~-~-> 00:02:16,920 | ||
| 115 | a 62% retracement level entry at 177 and 2030 seconds. So | ||
| 116 | |||
| 117 | 30 | ||
| 118 | 00:02:16,920 ~-~-> 00:02:22,530 | ||
| 119 | the entry is our hypothetical 177 and 2030 seconds, it | ||
| 120 | |||
| 121 | 31 | ||
| 122 | 00:02:22,530 ~-~-> 00:02:25,770 | ||
| 123 | suffers a draw down now I'm having annotations here not | ||
| 124 | |||
| 125 | 32 | ||
| 126 | 00:02:25,860 ~-~-> 00:02:28,380 | ||
| 127 | saying that you would be filled here you will be filled here | ||
| 128 | |||
| 129 | 33 | ||
| 130 | 00:02:29,040 ~-~-> 00:02:33,270 | ||
| 131 | on this candle right there, that particular candle and you | ||
| 132 | |||
| 133 | 34 | ||
| 134 | 00:02:33,270 ~-~-> 00:02:36,660 | ||
| 135 | have one candle here that goes a little bit against you. But | ||
| 136 | |||
| 137 | 35 | ||
| 138 | 00:02:36,660 ~-~-> 00:02:40,350 | ||
| 139 | this all these candles here these it's two ticks, which is | ||
| 140 | |||
| 141 | 36 | ||
| 142 | 00:02:40,350 ~-~-> 00:02:44,910 | ||
| 143 | $31 and 25 cents, each contract, or in this case would be | ||
| 144 | |||
| 145 | 37 | ||
| 146 | 00:02:44,910 ~-~-> 00:02:49,680 | ||
| 147 | $62 and 50 cents drawl down and using a six tick stop. So | ||
| 148 | |||
| 149 | 38 | ||
| 150 | 00:02:49,680 ~-~-> 00:02:52,800 | ||
| 151 | it's six times $31 and 25 cents per contract that you're | ||
| 152 | |||
| 153 | 39 | ||
| 154 | 00:02:52,800 ~-~-> 00:02:57,180 | ||
| 155 | trading. And we have relative equal lows here as well and | ||
| 156 | |||
| 157 | 40 | ||
| 158 | 00:02:57,180 ~-~-> 00:03:04,680 | ||
| 159 | this heavy line here is the period previous day's low, so | ||
| 160 | |||
| 161 | 41 | ||
| 162 | 00:03:04,680 ~-~-> 00:03:10,470 | ||
| 163 | June 1 daily low, you can see that we did create an optimal | ||
| 164 | |||
| 165 | 42 | ||
| 166 | 00:03:10,470 ~-~-> 00:03:15,990 | ||
| 167 | trade entry, looking for it to trade down below that. And | ||
| 168 | |||
| 169 | 43 | ||
| 170 | 00:03:15,990 ~-~-> 00:03:19,350 | ||
| 171 | ultimately, two standard deviations. That's our day trade | ||
| 172 | |||
| 173 | 44 | ||
| 174 | 00:03:19,380 ~-~-> 00:03:24,960 | ||
| 175 | for this model is a total of 29 ticks or $906 and 25 cents. | ||
| 176 | |||
| 177 | 45 | ||
| 178 | 00:03:24,960 ~-~-> 00:03:27,630 | ||
| 179 | Now if you'd like to leader in something to see if it's | ||
| 180 | |||
| 181 | 46 | ||
| 182 | 00:03:27,630 ~-~-> 00:03:31,140 | ||
| 183 | going to catch a runner, it does in fact go down here and it | ||
| 184 | |||
| 185 | 47 | ||
| 186 | 00:03:31,170 ~-~-> 00:03:34,050 | ||
| 187 | actually trades to a point at which for one contract, it was | ||
| 188 | |||
| 189 | 48 | ||
| 190 | 00:03:34,050 ~-~-> 00:03:40,530 | ||
| 191 | over 1600 and $50 per contract. So not bad. Really hard to | ||
| 192 | |||
| 193 | 49 | ||
| 194 | 00:03:40,530 ~-~-> 00:03:43,230 | ||
| 195 | beat the bond market. It's been tough recently because of | ||
| 196 | |||
| 197 | 50 | ||
| 198 | 00:03:43,230 ~-~-> 00:03:46,710 | ||
| 199 | all the consolidation and such but when this market does | ||
| 200 | |||
| 201 | 51 | ||
| 202 | 00:03:46,710 ~-~-> 00:03:49,920 | ||
| 203 | move, there is no better market out there. It beats forex, | ||
| 204 | |||
| 205 | 52 | ||
| 206 | 00:03:49,950 ~-~-> 00:03:53,400 | ||
| 207 | it beats, index futures, it beats crypto and beats | ||
| 208 | |||
| 209 | 53 | ||
| 210 | 00:03:53,400 ~-~-> 00:03:56,700 | ||
| 211 | everything. It's so perfect. It allows very ultra short term | ||
| 212 | |||
| 213 | 54 | ||
| 214 | 00:03:57,150 ~-~-> 00:03:59,880 | ||
| 215 | trades to have very tight stops as you can see here in this | ||
| 216 | |||
| 217 | 55 | ||
| 218 | 00:03:59,880 ~-~-> 00:04:02,910 | ||
| 219 | case have actually been done with a four tick stop loss and | ||
| 220 | |||
| 221 | 56 | ||
| 222 | 00:04:02,910 ~-~-> 00:04:04,890 | ||
| 223 | it would have been fine. So hopefully you found this example | ||
| 224 | |||
| 225 | 57 | ||
| 226 | 00:04:04,920 ~-~-> 00:04:07,350 | ||
| 227 | insightful. Until next time, I wish you good luck and good | ||
| 228 | |||
| 229 | 58 | ||
| 230 | 00:04:07,350 ~-~-> 00:04:07,770 | ||
| 231 | trading. |