Wiki source code of OTE Pattern Recognition Series - Vol 09.srt
Hide last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.1 | 1 | 1 |
2 | 00:00:10,920 ~-~-> 00:00:14,280 | ||
3 | ICT: Okay, folks, welcome back. This is volume number nine | ||
4 | |||
5 | 2 | ||
6 | 00:00:14,310 ~-~-> 00:00:17,910 | ||
7 | in a continuing series of 20 videos for the ICT optimal | ||
8 | |||
9 | 3 | ||
10 | 00:00:17,910 ~-~-> 00:00:22,620 | ||
11 | trade entry pattern recognition series for YouTube. Before I | ||
12 | |||
13 | 4 | ||
14 | 00:00:22,620 ~-~-> 00:00:26,910 | ||
15 | get into this, just as a reminder, you can also take a look | ||
16 | |||
17 | 5 | ||
18 | 00:00:26,910 ~-~-> 00:00:32,460 | ||
19 | at the British pound, pound versus dollar. And you'll see | ||
20 | |||
21 | 6 | ||
22 | 00:00:32,460 ~-~-> 00:00:35,730 | ||
23 | that it gave us a optimal trade entry during the New York | ||
24 | |||
25 | 7 | ||
26 | 00:00:35,730 ~-~-> 00:00:40,950 | ||
27 | session running out to previous day's high. So it's kinda | ||
28 | |||
29 | 8 | ||
30 | 00:00:40,950 ~-~-> 00:00:44,670 | ||
31 | like a twofer today, but I want to use the Euro Aussie today | ||
32 | |||
33 | 9 | ||
34 | 00:00:44,670 ~-~-> 00:00:47,940 | ||
35 | because it's a pair I don't do too much discussion about and | ||
36 | |||
37 | 10 | ||
38 | 00:00:47,940 ~-~-> 00:00:54,000 | ||
39 | I want you to take a look at the low from the 18th over | ||
40 | |||
41 | 11 | ||
42 | 00:00:54,000 ~-~-> 00:00:58,320 | ||
43 | here. And this is going to be a question it's going to pop | ||
44 | |||
45 | 12 | ||
46 | 00:00:58,320 ~-~-> 00:01:00,750 | ||
47 | up if you haven't already had it. Come up. In the | ||
48 | |||
49 | 13 | ||
50 | 00:01:00,780 ~-~-> 00:01:04,140 | ||
51 | progression through this series, what happens if the next | ||
52 | |||
53 | 14 | ||
54 | 00:01:04,140 ~-~-> 00:01:09,450 | ||
55 | day we go through it a little bit, but does go higher? Or | ||
56 | |||
57 | 15 | ||
58 | 00:01:09,750 ~-~-> 00:01:12,420 | ||
59 | just because it goes below it, and we're expecting it to go | ||
60 | |||
61 | 16 | ||
62 | 00:01:12,420 ~-~-> 00:01:17,010 | ||
63 | below the previous day's low? Doesn't that negate taking a | ||
64 | |||
65 | 17 | ||
66 | 00:01:17,010 ~-~-> 00:01:20,040 | ||
67 | New York session trade? And the question is answered with | ||
68 | |||
69 | 18 | ||
70 | 00:01:20,040 ~-~-> 00:01:25,470 | ||
71 | simply now, as you'll see now, take a look at this. Here's | ||
72 | |||
73 | 19 | ||
74 | 00:01:25,470 ~-~-> 00:01:29,670 | ||
75 | Monday's low on the Euro Aussie. So we project that in | ||
76 | |||
77 | 20 | ||
78 | 00:01:29,700 ~-~-> 00:01:33,150 | ||
79 | future this is what I refer to as a shallow run. And | ||
80 | |||
81 | 21 | ||
82 | 00:01:33,180 ~-~-> 00:01:36,540 | ||
83 | basically it This leaves unfinished business. Okay, the | ||
84 | |||
85 | 22 | ||
86 | 00:01:36,540 ~-~-> 00:01:40,260 | ||
87 | markets warning later at another time, run back to that | ||
88 | |||
89 | 23 | ||
90 | 00:01:40,260 ~-~-> 00:01:44,190 | ||
91 | liquidity just in the same capacity does it here. We have an | ||
92 | |||
93 | 24 | ||
94 | 00:01:44,220 ~-~-> 00:01:47,550 | ||
95 | old high from the 18th and it runs above it very shallow, | ||
96 | |||
97 | 25 | ||
98 | 00:01:47,970 ~-~-> 00:01:51,750 | ||
99 | then runs down below the Monday low, then it rallies all the | ||
100 | |||
101 | 26 | ||
102 | 00:01:51,750 ~-~-> 00:01:54,660 | ||
103 | way back above these relatively equal highs, clearing that | ||
104 | |||
105 | 27 | ||
106 | 00:01:54,660 ~-~-> 00:01:57,930 | ||
107 | liquidity out. Then and only then does it come down to make | ||
108 | |||
109 | 28 | ||
110 | 00:01:57,930 ~-~-> 00:02:01,980 | ||
111 | a more significant run below. Monday's low and the initial | ||
112 | |||
113 | 29 | ||
114 | 00:02:01,980 ~-~-> 00:02:07,560 | ||
115 | daily low formed here in New York session, based on our | ||
116 | |||
117 | 30 | ||
118 | 00:02:07,560 ~-~-> 00:02:11,940 | ||
119 | rules, we're looking for an optimal trade entry after seeing | ||
120 | |||
121 | 31 | ||
122 | 00:02:11,940 ~-~-> 00:02:15,270 | ||
123 | a run above relative equal highs and a shallow run here, and | ||
124 | |||
125 | 32 | ||
126 | 00:02:15,270 ~-~-> 00:02:18,600 | ||
127 | it's starting to really gain momentum at this point, if we | ||
128 | |||
129 | 33 | ||
130 | 00:02:18,600 ~-~-> 00:02:21,780 | ||
131 | see a retracement like this, we had now a shallow run here, | ||
132 | |||
133 | 34 | ||
134 | 00:02:22,080 ~-~-> 00:02:25,710 | ||
135 | and a shallow run here. That means that it's really primed | ||
136 | |||
137 | 35 | ||
138 | 00:02:25,770 ~-~-> 00:02:28,980 | ||
139 | to make it more significant run lower just later in the day, | ||
140 | |||
141 | 36 | ||
142 | 00:02:28,980 ~-~-> 00:02:32,880 | ||
143 | and we're going to use the New York session time of day to | ||
144 | |||
145 | 37 | ||
146 | 00:02:32,880 ~-~-> 00:02:37,830 | ||
147 | look for an optimal trade entry. This high to this low price | ||
148 | |||
149 | 38 | ||
150 | 00:02:37,830 ~-~-> 00:02:40,800 | ||
151 | retraces back to the 70.5 level just a little bit above | ||
152 | |||
153 | 39 | ||
154 | 00:02:40,800 ~-~-> 00:02:44,370 | ||
155 | that. But keeping with the rules of this model, we're using | ||
156 | |||
157 | 40 | ||
158 | 00:02:44,370 ~-~-> 00:02:49,830 | ||
159 | the 62% retracement level. In this case it's 166 97 and five | ||
160 | |||
161 | 41 | ||
162 | 00:02:49,830 ~-~-> 00:02:53,940 | ||
163 | pips as our entry stock would have to be at this high. The | ||
164 | |||
165 | 42 | ||
166 | 00:02:53,940 ~-~-> 00:02:58,260 | ||
167 | trade has seven pips drawdown theoretically and expansion | ||
168 | |||
169 | 43 | ||
170 | 00:02:58,260 ~-~-> 00:03:02,610 | ||
171 | down takes out the short term low. He And we can offer 30 | ||
172 | |||
173 | 44 | ||
174 | 00:03:02,610 ~-~-> 00:03:07,620 | ||
175 | pips as a partial retraces back to Monday's old daily low. | ||
176 | |||
177 | 45 | ||
178 | 00:03:08,160 ~-~-> 00:03:11,250 | ||
179 | And then the further expansion down again, consolidates and | ||
180 | |||
181 | 46 | ||
182 | 00:03:11,250 ~-~-> 00:03:14,760 | ||
183 | finally makes a run, offering one half of the standard | ||
184 | |||
185 | 47 | ||
186 | 00:03:14,760 ~-~-> 00:03:19,320 | ||
187 | deviation of the dealing range used for the fib. So 30 pips | ||
188 | |||
189 | 48 | ||
190 | 00:03:19,350 ~-~-> 00:03:24,930 | ||
191 | offered 50 pips offered from this run here to here. That | ||
192 | |||
193 | 49 | ||
194 | 00:03:24,960 ~-~-> 00:03:27,600 | ||
195 | honestly is what I'm looking for once a week. I'm not in | ||
196 | |||
197 | 50 | ||
198 | 00:03:27,600 ~-~-> 00:03:31,140 | ||
199 | here trying to do a whole lot. So if I capture 50 to 75 pips | ||
200 | |||
201 | 51 | ||
202 | 00:03:31,140 ~-~-> 00:03:35,640 | ||
203 | a week, I'm pretty much done. So hopefully his examples been | ||
204 | |||
205 | 52 | ||
206 | 00:03:35,640 ~-~-> 00:03:40,200 | ||
207 | insightful in regards to do we consider taking the previous | ||
208 | |||
209 | 53 | ||
210 | 00:03:40,200 ~-~-> 00:03:43,110 | ||
211 | day's low or previous day's high in New York session if it's | ||
212 | |||
213 | 54 | ||
214 | 00:03:43,110 ~-~-> 00:03:48,450 | ||
215 | already done so even in a small capacity? Now, the answer is | ||
216 | |||
217 | 55 | ||
218 | 00:03:48,510 ~-~-> 00:03:50,850 | ||
219 | you want to stick with where the liquidity is going to be | ||
220 | |||
221 | 56 | ||
222 | 00:03:50,850 ~-~-> 00:03:54,090 | ||
223 | reaching relative to the previous day's high or low. And if | ||
224 | |||
225 | 57 | ||
226 | 00:03:54,090 ~-~-> 00:03:57,510 | ||
227 | it's not really clear, just simply stay out. And that way | ||
228 | |||
229 | 58 | ||
230 | 00:03:57,510 ~-~-> 00:04:01,380 | ||
231 | you can leave the fight another day without Needless risk, | ||
232 | |||
233 | 59 | ||
234 | 00:04:01,740 ~-~-> 00:04:04,830 | ||
235 | or focus on another pair. Until next time, wish good luck | ||
236 | |||
237 | 60 | ||
238 | 00:04:04,860 ~-~-> 00:04:05,610 | ||
239 | and good trading. |