Wiki source code of Mastering High Probability Scalping Vol 2 of 3.srt
Show last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||
2 | 00:00:08,610 ~-~-> 00:00:14,430 | ||
3 | ICT: Okay folks, welcome back. This is volume two of three, | ||
4 | |||
5 | 2 | ||
6 | 00:00:15,180 ~-~-> 00:00:19,350 | ||
7 | four mastering high probability scalping, focusing on | ||
8 | |||
9 | 3 | ||
10 | 00:00:19,350 ~-~-> 00:00:21,240 | ||
11 | previous day bank liquidity runs. | ||
12 | |||
13 | 4 | ||
14 | 00:00:27,540 ~-~-> 00:00:31,950 | ||
15 | Alright, so what we are reviewing the daily bias so that we | ||
16 | |||
17 | 5 | ||
18 | 00:00:31,950 ~-~-> 00:00:36,090 | ||
19 | everyone knows exactly what should be done. And I'm | ||
20 | |||
21 | 6 | ||
22 | 00:00:36,090 ~-~-> 00:00:40,470 | ||
23 | referring to a daily chart here. So when we're implementing | ||
24 | |||
25 | 7 | ||
26 | 00:00:40,500 ~-~-> 00:00:42,690 | ||
27 | the daily bias, what we're gonna be doing is on a daily | ||
28 | |||
29 | 8 | ||
30 | 00:00:42,690 ~-~-> 00:00:46,830 | ||
31 | chart, we're gonna be waiting for a swing high to form and | ||
32 | |||
33 | 9 | ||
34 | 00:00:46,830 ~-~-> 00:00:50,940 | ||
35 | to be broken this will be bullish, okay when we see a swing | ||
36 | |||
37 | 10 | ||
38 | 00:00:50,940 ~-~-> 00:00:56,010 | ||
39 | high broken downwards, a candle that has a lower high to the | ||
40 | |||
41 | 11 | ||
42 | 00:00:56,010 ~-~-> 00:00:59,760 | ||
43 | left of it, and the lower high to the right of it as seen | ||
44 | |||
45 | 12 | ||
46 | 00:00:59,760 ~-~-> 00:01:06,000 | ||
47 | here. Okay, if at anytime in the future, it's traded through | ||
48 | |||
49 | 13 | ||
50 | 00:01:07,230 ~-~-> 00:01:11,130 | ||
51 | when we have that we have a bullish stage. In other words, | ||
52 | |||
53 | 14 | ||
54 | 00:01:11,130 ~-~-> 00:01:15,810 | ||
55 | we anticipate a future Buying Opportunity doesn't mean the | ||
56 | |||
57 | 15 | ||
58 | 00:01:15,810 ~-~-> 00:01:20,400 | ||
59 | buy right there just means we are now on on alert to wait | ||
60 | |||
61 | 16 | ||
62 | 00:01:20,400 ~-~-> 00:01:26,700 | ||
63 | for a specific criteria criteria is going to be looking for | ||
64 | |||
65 | 17 | ||
66 | 00:01:26,700 ~-~-> 00:01:32,730 | ||
67 | a swing load form down here okay a swing low can is a candle | ||
68 | |||
69 | 18 | ||
70 | 00:01:32,730 ~-~-> 00:01:35,160 | ||
71 | that has a higher load to the left of it a higher load to | ||
72 | |||
73 | 19 | ||
74 | 00:01:35,160 ~-~-> 00:01:40,890 | ||
75 | the right of it again on a daily chart. key point here is | ||
76 | |||
77 | 20 | ||
78 | 00:01:41,520 ~-~-> 00:01:46,140 | ||
79 | this swing low should not take out a previous recent swing | ||
80 | |||
81 | 21 | ||
82 | 00:01:46,140 ~-~-> 00:01:52,440 | ||
83 | low okay. So if we have this criteria immediately after a | ||
84 | |||
85 | 22 | ||
86 | 00:01:52,440 ~-~-> 00:01:58,830 | ||
87 | swing high is broken. We have the probable optimal trade | ||
88 | |||
89 | 23 | ||
90 | 00:01:58,830 ~-~-> 00:02:04,200 | ||
91 | entry scenario By itself on a daily chart, okay, doesn't | ||
92 | |||
93 | 24 | ||
94 | 00:02:04,200 ~-~-> 00:02:06,660 | ||
95 | mean it has to line up with a 62 to seven times tracing | ||
96 | |||
97 | 25 | ||
98 | 00:02:06,660 ~-~-> 00:02:11,700 | ||
99 | level, this means that we are in effect, trading with a | ||
100 | |||
101 | 26 | ||
102 | 00:02:11,880 ~-~-> 00:02:17,370 | ||
103 | higher low after breaking a short term high so we have a | ||
104 | |||
105 | 27 | ||
106 | 00:02:17,370 ~-~-> 00:02:20,490 | ||
107 | break in market structure retracements. Therefore, the | ||
108 | |||
109 | 28 | ||
110 | 00:02:20,490 ~-~-> 00:02:24,630 | ||
111 | market should have an ability to find momentum on the | ||
112 | |||
113 | 29 | ||
114 | 00:02:24,630 ~-~-> 00:02:30,600 | ||
115 | upside, okay. When the swing low forms, we're going to be | ||
116 | |||
117 | 30 | ||
118 | 00:02:30,600 ~-~-> 00:02:34,770 | ||
119 | anticipating the third candle. That is this one here. It's | ||
120 | |||
121 | 31 | ||
122 | 00:02:34,770 ~-~-> 00:02:39,240 | ||
123 | high to be rated or traded through the very next day. So | ||
124 | |||
125 | 32 | ||
126 | 00:02:39,240 ~-~-> 00:02:42,540 | ||
127 | towards the next trading day where it opens, preferably, you | ||
128 | |||
129 | 33 | ||
130 | 00:02:42,540 ~-~-> 00:02:47,250 | ||
131 | want to see it open below the third candle the swing lows | ||
132 | |||
133 | 34 | ||
134 | 00:02:47,310 ~-~-> 00:02:53,580 | ||
135 | high. Okay, so your criterion, you want to see the swing low | ||
136 | |||
137 | 35 | ||
138 | 00:02:54,090 ~-~-> 00:02:58,650 | ||
139 | form without breaking a previous swing low immediately after | ||
140 | |||
141 | 36 | ||
142 | 00:02:59,370 ~-~-> 00:03:05,280 | ||
143 | a swing. is formed but breaking a previous swing high. Okay, | ||
144 | |||
145 | 37 | ||
146 | 00:03:05,280 ~-~-> 00:03:09,480 | ||
147 | so again the stage for a bullish scenario is anytime a swing | ||
148 | |||
149 | 38 | ||
150 | 00:03:09,480 ~-~-> 00:03:15,570 | ||
151 | high is broken and traded to a new high expected retracement | ||
152 | |||
153 | 39 | ||
154 | 00:03:16,110 ~-~-> 00:03:19,920 | ||
155 | wait for a daily swing low to form swing low should be a | ||
156 | |||
157 | 40 | ||
158 | 00:03:19,920 ~-~-> 00:03:24,870 | ||
159 | higher swing load in any recent previous short term swing | ||
160 | |||
161 | 41 | ||
162 | 00:03:24,870 ~-~-> 00:03:30,990 | ||
163 | low the third candle that makes the swing low that high you | ||
164 | |||
165 | 42 | ||
166 | 00:03:30,990 ~-~-> 00:03:37,020 | ||
167 | want to see the next candle open below that candles high and | ||
168 | |||
169 | 43 | ||
170 | 00:03:37,020 ~-~-> 00:03:41,070 | ||
171 | then anticipate the market to run through this candles Hi. | ||
172 | |||
173 | 44 | ||
174 | 00:03:44,610 ~-~-> 00:03:47,040 | ||
175 | We're gonna be looking for previous day's highs to be rated | ||
176 | |||
177 | 45 | ||
178 | 00:03:47,070 ~-~-> 00:03:51,420 | ||
179 | each day until a swing high on a daily forms or price | ||
180 | |||
181 | 46 | ||
182 | 00:03:51,420 ~-~-> 00:03:54,750 | ||
183 | reaches a key support resistance level. And I'll give an | ||
184 | |||
185 | 47 | ||
186 | 00:03:54,750 ~-~-> 00:03:58,620 | ||
187 | example what that would be the immediate candle after this | ||
188 | |||
189 | 48 | ||
190 | 00:03:58,620 ~-~-> 00:04:03,690 | ||
191 | particular days Maybe looking for a bullish scenario. Okay | ||
192 | |||
193 | 49 | ||
194 | 00:04:03,690 ~-~-> 00:04:07,650 | ||
195 | either in the London or the New York scenario to anticipate | ||
196 | |||
197 | 50 | ||
198 | 00:04:07,710 ~-~-> 00:04:11,400 | ||
199 | a raid on the previous day's high. The very next trading | ||
200 | |||
201 | 51 | ||
202 | 00:04:11,400 ~-~-> 00:04:15,030 | ||
203 | day, we would look for the same scenario again, looking for | ||
204 | |||
205 | 52 | ||
206 | 00:04:15,030 ~-~-> 00:04:18,570 | ||
207 | reasons to be bullish on a retracement lower, going higher | ||
208 | |||
209 | 53 | ||
210 | 00:04:18,930 ~-~-> 00:04:23,640 | ||
211 | reaching for ultimately to this old high, this would be a | ||
212 | |||
213 | 54 | ||
214 | 00:04:23,670 ~-~-> 00:04:28,410 | ||
215 | area of resistance, okay or if it trades to that high and | ||
216 | |||
217 | 55 | ||
218 | 00:04:28,410 ~-~-> 00:04:31,890 | ||
219 | through it we'd still maintain looking for bullish scenarios | ||
220 | |||
221 | 56 | ||
222 | 00:04:32,340 ~-~-> 00:04:36,720 | ||
223 | buying looking for previous day's highs to be taken out. Or | ||
224 | |||
225 | 57 | ||
226 | 00:04:36,720 ~-~-> 00:04:40,830 | ||
227 | if we have price rally up to a degree either at this level | ||
228 | |||
229 | 58 | ||
230 | 00:04:40,830 ~-~-> 00:04:45,210 | ||
231 | or before it and creating a swing high. Once that forms. We | ||
232 | |||
233 | 59 | ||
234 | 00:04:45,210 ~-~-> 00:04:48,450 | ||
235 | have to wait for that swing high to be broke on the upside. | ||
236 | |||
237 | 60 | ||
238 | 00:04:48,930 ~-~-> 00:04:51,750 | ||
239 | Okay. There's going to be a lot of missed opportunities | ||
240 | |||
241 | 61 | ||
242 | 00:04:51,780 ~-~-> 00:04:55,800 | ||
243 | admittedly with this but it gives you a specific criteria on | ||
244 | |||
245 | 62 | ||
246 | 00:04:55,800 ~-~-> 00:04:56,400 | ||
247 | the work within | ||
248 | |||
249 | 63 | ||
250 | 00:05:02,370 ~-~-> 00:05:07,680 | ||
251 | Okay, employing the daily bias This is why it's bearish and | ||
252 | |||
253 | 64 | ||
254 | 00:05:07,680 ~-~-> 00:05:11,730 | ||
255 | we waiting again on the daily chart for a swing low on a | ||
256 | |||
257 | 65 | ||
258 | 00:05:11,730 ~-~-> 00:05:15,990 | ||
259 | daily to be broken. So we have a swing low here, okay again, | ||
260 | |||
261 | 66 | ||
262 | 00:05:16,140 ~-~-> 00:05:19,920 | ||
263 | a daily candle that has a higher low to the left of it and a | ||
264 | |||
265 | 67 | ||
266 | 00:05:19,920 ~-~-> 00:05:24,030 | ||
267 | higher low to the right of it eventually as price trades | ||
268 | |||
269 | 68 | ||
270 | 00:05:24,030 ~-~-> 00:05:29,280 | ||
271 | through this, this break in market structure sets the stage | ||
272 | |||
273 | 69 | ||
274 | 00:05:29,280 ~-~-> 00:05:33,870 | ||
275 | for a bearish market condition. Okay, so we're kind of like | ||
276 | |||
277 | 70 | ||
278 | 00:05:33,870 ~-~-> 00:05:37,680 | ||
279 | alerted to waiting for a sell scenario. We wait for a | ||
280 | |||
281 | 71 | ||
282 | 00:05:37,680 ~-~-> 00:05:42,330 | ||
283 | retracement when we get the daily swing high formed. The | ||
284 | |||
285 | 72 | ||
286 | 00:05:42,330 ~-~-> 00:05:46,350 | ||
287 | third candle Okay, that makes a swing high. We're going to | ||
288 | |||
289 | 73 | ||
290 | 00:05:46,350 ~-~-> 00:05:49,440 | ||
291 | be anticipating that low to be violated the very next | ||
292 | |||
293 | 74 | ||
294 | 00:05:49,440 ~-~-> 00:05:52,440 | ||
295 | trading day. key point is we don't want to see this swing | ||
296 | |||
297 | 75 | ||
298 | 00:05:52,440 ~-~-> 00:05:56,670 | ||
299 | high break a previous swing high immediately before the | ||
300 | |||
301 | 76 | ||
302 | 00:05:56,670 ~-~-> 00:06:01,140 | ||
303 | swing low that has broken a previous swing Okay so what | ||
304 | |||
305 | 77 | ||
306 | 00:06:01,140 ~-~-> 00:06:06,180 | ||
307 | we're doing is we're looking for a swing low broken here so | ||
308 | |||
309 | 78 | ||
310 | 00:06:06,180 ~-~-> 00:06:08,550 | ||
311 | now we have the ability to see the market trade to a new a | ||
312 | |||
313 | 79 | ||
314 | 00:06:08,550 ~-~-> 00:06:14,460 | ||
315 | new low then it retraces but will not break a swing high. So | ||
316 | |||
317 | 80 | ||
318 | 00:06:14,460 ~-~-> 00:06:21,240 | ||
319 | now we're getting that three quarterback retracement. Okay. | ||
320 | |||
321 | 81 | ||
322 | 00:06:21,240 ~-~-> 00:06:25,200 | ||
323 | So by itself it's like an optimal trade entry doesn't have | ||
324 | |||
325 | 82 | ||
326 | 00:06:25,200 ~-~-> 00:06:28,530 | ||
327 | to be 262 to seven times and tracing level. It's better if | ||
328 | |||
329 | 83 | ||
330 | 00:06:28,530 ~-~-> 00:06:32,550 | ||
331 | it does, but it doesn't require it. You want to see the | ||
332 | |||
333 | 84 | ||
334 | 00:06:32,550 ~-~-> 00:06:36,180 | ||
335 | market trade up until it creates a daily swing high. When | ||
336 | |||
337 | 85 | ||
338 | 00:06:36,180 ~-~-> 00:06:40,020 | ||
339 | that third candle forms and it's closed very next trading | ||
340 | |||
341 | 86 | ||
342 | 00:06:40,020 ~-~-> 00:06:43,740 | ||
343 | day, you will be watching for price to make an attempt to | ||
344 | |||
345 | 87 | ||
346 | 00:06:43,740 ~-~-> 00:06:47,640 | ||
347 | trade through this candles low and that remains the bias | ||
348 | |||
349 | 88 | ||
350 | 00:06:47,670 ~-~-> 00:06:51,480 | ||
351 | each trading day until a swing low forms or we trade down to | ||
352 | |||
353 | 89 | ||
354 | 00:06:51,480 ~-~-> 00:06:57,840 | ||
355 | this old low. Okay, or another significant low. So again, | ||
356 | |||
357 | 90 | ||
358 | 00:06:57,990 ~-~-> 00:07:00,960 | ||
359 | summary it's we're looking for Swing loaded form on the | ||
360 | |||
361 | 91 | ||
362 | 00:07:00,960 ~-~-> 00:07:06,750 | ||
363 | daily chart and then it be broken. Then we're looking for a | ||
364 | |||
365 | 92 | ||
366 | 00:07:06,750 ~-~-> 00:07:10,050 | ||
367 | swing high to form but does not break a recent swing high. | ||
368 | |||
369 | 93 | ||
370 | 00:07:10,530 ~-~-> 00:07:13,500 | ||
371 | So here's a swing high, it doesn't come back to clear or | ||
372 | |||
373 | 94 | ||
374 | 00:07:13,500 ~-~-> 00:07:18,840 | ||
375 | break a previous swing high. When the swing high forms, we | ||
376 | |||
377 | 95 | ||
378 | 00:07:18,840 ~-~-> 00:07:22,590 | ||
379 | anticipate the third daily candle in the swing high right | ||
380 | |||
381 | 96 | ||
382 | 00:07:22,590 ~-~-> 00:07:26,370 | ||
383 | here. We look for its low to be rated or traded through the | ||
384 | |||
385 | 97 | ||
386 | 00:07:26,370 ~-~-> 00:07:30,930 | ||
387 | following day. And we look for the previous day's low to be | ||
388 | |||
389 | 98 | ||
390 | 00:07:30,930 ~-~-> 00:07:35,550 | ||
391 | rated each day until a new swing low on a daily forms, or | ||
392 | |||
393 | 99 | ||
394 | 00:07:35,550 ~-~-> 00:07:41,490 | ||
395 | price reaches a key support resistance level. Now, you're | ||
396 | |||
397 | 100 | ||
398 | 00:07:41,490 ~-~-> 00:07:44,940 | ||
399 | not going to have a set up every single trading day. Okay, | ||
400 | |||
401 | 101 | ||
402 | 00:07:45,000 ~-~-> 00:07:49,440 | ||
403 | I've gotten a lot of emails so far. Since I've produced the | ||
404 | |||
405 | 102 | ||
406 | 00:07:49,440 ~-~-> 00:07:53,490 | ||
407 | first volume of this three part series. And the common | ||
408 | |||
409 | 103 | ||
410 | 00:07:53,490 ~-~-> 00:07:57,690 | ||
411 | complaint. I'm getting his I'm not getting a set up every | ||
412 | |||
413 | 104 | ||
414 | 00:07:57,690 ~-~-> 00:08:02,970 | ||
415 | day and it's not been promised, okay, if you look at every | ||
416 | |||
417 | 105 | ||
418 | 00:08:03,570 ~-~-> 00:08:08,040 | ||
419 | major that's paired against the dollar, you can get about | ||
420 | |||
421 | 106 | ||
422 | 00:08:08,040 ~-~-> 00:08:13,620 | ||
423 | three to four solid setups per week. Now that means that | ||
424 | |||
425 | 107 | ||
426 | 00:08:13,620 ~-~-> 00:08:15,900 | ||
427 | you're probably not going to get a set up every single train | ||
428 | |||
429 | 108 | ||
430 | 00:08:15,900 ~-~-> 00:08:20,430 | ||
431 | day, chances are one pair among all the ones that are | ||
432 | |||
433 | 109 | ||
434 | 00:08:20,430 ~-~-> 00:08:24,630 | ||
435 | available will provide you a setup to study. So you can | ||
436 | |||
437 | 110 | ||
438 | 00:08:24,630 ~-~-> 00:08:29,040 | ||
439 | practice in your demo account with it. The emphasis is for | ||
440 | |||
441 | 111 | ||
442 | 00:08:29,040 ~-~-> 00:08:33,900 | ||
443 | you to remember that you only need about 25 pips or so per | ||
444 | |||
445 | 112 | ||
446 | 00:08:33,900 ~-~-> 00:08:38,490 | ||
447 | week. And if you're 2% of your account, and it may be high, | ||
448 | |||
449 | 113 | ||
450 | 00:08:38,580 ~-~-> 00:08:42,450 | ||
451 | admittedly, for some of you, but if you have grown in your | ||
452 | |||
453 | 114 | ||
454 | 00:08:42,450 ~-~-> 00:08:45,120 | ||
455 | understanding about what I'm teaching, and you're willing to | ||
456 | |||
457 | 115 | ||
458 | 00:08:45,120 ~-~-> 00:08:50,580 | ||
459 | risk 2% it takes a little bit less than 25 pips per week to | ||
460 | |||
461 | 116 | ||
462 | 00:08:50,580 ~-~-> 00:08:55,230 | ||
463 | double your account or make 6% compounded monthly. And I | ||
464 | |||
465 | 117 | ||
466 | 00:08:55,230 ~-~-> 00:08:58,800 | ||
467 | think that's the objective that folks should be looking for | ||
468 | |||
469 | 118 | ||
470 | 00:08:58,800 ~-~-> 00:09:03,120 | ||
471 | when they're new. Because it's realistic, it's low, but yet | ||
472 | |||
473 | 119 | ||
474 | 00:09:03,120 ~-~-> 00:09:06,510 | ||
475 | it still doubles the account over the course of a 12 month, | ||
476 | |||
477 | 120 | ||
478 | 00:09:07,110 ~-~-> 00:09:13,230 | ||
479 | year. So, if we're looking for one good setup that would | ||
480 | |||
481 | 121 | ||
482 | 00:09:13,230 ~-~-> 00:09:18,420 | ||
483 | yield that 25 pips or so you only need one scalp. One setup | ||
484 | |||
485 | 122 | ||
486 | 00:09:18,420 ~-~-> 00:09:25,440 | ||
487 | that does that. Now I started the current teaching week on | ||
488 | |||
489 | 123 | ||
490 | 00:09:25,440 ~-~-> 00:09:29,880 | ||
491 | Twitter. Kind of like building the idea of making 50 pips | ||
492 | |||
493 | 124 | ||
494 | 00:09:29,880 ~-~-> 00:09:34,410 | ||
495 | per week. If you frame your scalps in such a way that it | ||
496 | |||
497 | 125 | ||
498 | 00:09:34,410 ~-~-> 00:09:38,490 | ||
499 | allows you to aim for 25 pips you only really need two | ||
500 | |||
501 | 126 | ||
502 | 00:09:38,490 ~-~-> 00:09:42,930 | ||
503 | setups per week, don't you? Now, I like that model | ||
504 | |||
505 | 127 | ||
506 | 00:09:42,930 ~-~-> 00:09:47,100 | ||
507 | personally, because it's very close to what I do as a short | ||
508 | |||
509 | 128 | ||
510 | 00:09:47,100 ~-~-> 00:09:48,270 | ||
511 | term or intraday trader. | ||
512 | |||
513 | 129 | ||
514 | 00:09:49,620 ~-~-> 00:09:52,530 | ||
515 | I know the likelihood is I want to be trading on Tuesdays | ||
516 | |||
517 | 130 | ||
518 | 00:09:52,530 ~-~-> 00:09:55,890 | ||
519 | and Wednesdays, if I can get my entire weekly objective | ||
520 | |||
521 | 131 | ||
522 | 00:09:55,890 ~-~-> 00:09:59,880 | ||
523 | which is 50 to 75 pips per week, if I can get that done in | ||
524 | |||
525 | 132 | ||
526 | 00:09:59,880 ~-~-> 00:10:02,280 | ||
527 | one day then I won't do any more trading after that, | ||
528 | |||
529 | 133 | ||
530 | 00:10:02,310 ~-~-> 00:10:05,550 | ||
531 | regardless of what day of the week it is. But usually I hone | ||
532 | |||
533 | 134 | ||
534 | 00:10:05,550 ~-~-> 00:10:07,620 | ||
535 | in on Tuesday and Wednesday because they're primarily the | ||
536 | |||
537 | 135 | ||
538 | 00:10:07,620 ~-~-> 00:10:11,550 | ||
539 | best days, whether bullish or bearish. If it's bullish for | ||
540 | |||
541 | 136 | ||
542 | 00:10:11,550 ~-~-> 00:10:15,060 | ||
543 | the week, then I'm looking for the weekly low to form around | ||
544 | |||
545 | 137 | ||
546 | 00:10:15,090 ~-~-> 00:10:20,730 | ||
547 | Tuesday or Wednesday's New York open. If I can anticipate a | ||
548 | |||
549 | 138 | ||
550 | 00:10:20,730 ~-~-> 00:10:26,220 | ||
551 | lower close or weekly bearish candle, shooting with an | ||
552 | |||
553 | 139 | ||
554 | 00:10:26,220 ~-~-> 00:10:28,050 | ||
555 | expectation that we're going to be seeing lower prices by | ||
556 | |||
557 | 140 | ||
558 | 00:10:28,050 ~-~-> 00:10:31,680 | ||
559 | Friday's close relative to Sunday's opening, then I'll be | ||
560 | |||
561 | 141 | ||
562 | 00:10:31,680 ~-~-> 00:10:34,800 | ||
563 | looking for Tuesday or Wednesday's price action to create | ||
564 | |||
565 | 142 | ||
566 | 00:10:34,800 ~-~-> 00:10:38,160 | ||
567 | the high of the week. So if I can trade in sync with that | ||
568 | |||
569 | 143 | ||
570 | 00:10:38,160 ~-~-> 00:10:45,540 | ||
571 | idea. It also formulates a lot more conviction and | ||
572 | |||
573 | 144 | ||
574 | 00:10:45,540 ~-~-> 00:10:48,180 | ||
575 | confidence behind the setups that I'm looking to trade | ||
576 | |||
577 | 145 | ||
578 | 00:10:48,210 ~-~-> 00:10:50,910 | ||
579 | especially with what's being described here. It's a rather | ||
580 | |||
581 | 146 | ||
582 | 00:10:50,910 ~-~-> 00:10:54,930 | ||
583 | simplistic approach. It may have been an oversimplification | ||
584 | |||
585 | 147 | ||
586 | 00:10:54,960 ~-~-> 00:10:58,800 | ||
587 | on my part, by way of creating this diagram but from an | ||
588 | |||
589 | 148 | ||
590 | 00:10:58,800 ~-~-> 00:11:02,160 | ||
591 | internal standpoint, however, View the marketplace, this is | ||
592 | |||
593 | 149 | ||
594 | 00:11:02,190 ~-~-> 00:11:05,850 | ||
595 | what I'm looking for. Okay? So if I see it on the daily | ||
596 | |||
597 | 150 | ||
598 | 00:11:05,850 ~-~-> 00:11:10,620 | ||
599 | chart, chances are, the daily chart will probably sustain | ||
600 | |||
601 | 151 | ||
602 | 00:11:10,620 ~-~-> 00:11:14,790 | ||
603 | the move for a few days, and you'll only need one trading | ||
604 | |||
605 | 152 | ||
606 | 00:11:14,790 ~-~-> 00:11:17,670 | ||
607 | day. Okay, so if you have a scenario that's bullish or | ||
608 | |||
609 | 153 | ||
610 | 00:11:17,670 ~-~-> 00:11:20,100 | ||
611 | bearish relative to what I just described here so far in | ||
612 | |||
613 | 154 | ||
614 | 00:11:20,100 ~-~-> 00:11:24,810 | ||
615 | this video, you chances are you're probably gonna have one | ||
616 | |||
617 | 155 | ||
618 | 00:11:24,810 ~-~-> 00:11:29,370 | ||
619 | day's worth of momentum. And that's all you need. So every | ||
620 | |||
621 | 156 | ||
622 | 00:11:29,370 ~-~-> 00:11:33,270 | ||
623 | single pair does not move lockstep to one another. They're | ||
624 | |||
625 | 157 | ||
626 | 00:11:33,270 ~-~-> 00:11:37,470 | ||
627 | not always moving in tandem. So what may be a good pair of | ||
628 | |||
629 | 158 | ||
630 | 00:11:37,470 ~-~-> 00:11:41,700 | ||
631 | trade today may not be a pair that's really good to trade | ||
632 | |||
633 | 159 | ||
634 | 00:11:41,700 ~-~-> 00:11:46,680 | ||
635 | tomorrow, but another pair may move in equal or better | ||
636 | |||
637 | 160 | ||
638 | 00:11:46,680 ~-~-> 00:11:51,570 | ||
639 | fashion. In other words, the setups are plenty, but you have | ||
640 | |||
641 | 161 | ||
642 | 00:11:51,570 ~-~-> 00:11:56,250 | ||
643 | to allow them to be presented in price action from the daily | ||
644 | |||
645 | 162 | ||
646 | 00:11:56,250 ~-~-> 00:12:01,170 | ||
647 | chart and then not forcing it. So stay Look over at the | ||
648 | |||
649 | 163 | ||
650 | 00:12:01,170 ~-~-> 00:12:03,870 | ||
651 | charts, I'll give you an example of what it looks like. And | ||
652 | |||
653 | 164 | ||
654 | 00:12:03,870 ~-~-> 00:12:11,070 | ||
655 | we can use the kill zones. Okay, we're looking at the cable, | ||
656 | |||
657 | 165 | ||
658 | 00:12:11,190 ~-~-> 00:12:16,170 | ||
659 | the daily chart. Now this scrolled through just found a | ||
660 | |||
661 | 166 | ||
662 | 00:12:16,170 ~-~-> 00:12:18,510 | ||
663 | random place, it doesn't make a difference where we start | ||
664 | |||
665 | 167 | ||
666 | 00:12:18,510 ~-~-> 00:12:25,410 | ||
667 | out. But I want you to take a look at the price action here. | ||
668 | |||
669 | 168 | ||
670 | 00:12:26,340 ~-~-> 00:12:34,680 | ||
671 | And then we're going to look at this swing low, right here, | ||
672 | |||
673 | 169 | ||
674 | 00:12:35,610 ~-~-> 00:12:41,100 | ||
675 | and it's on the heels of a previous short term high. | ||
676 | |||
677 | 170 | ||
678 | 00:12:46,380 ~-~-> 00:12:49,860 | ||
679 | Okay, so we have a short term high here. Lower high to the | ||
680 | |||
681 | 171 | ||
682 | 00:12:49,860 ~-~-> 00:12:53,100 | ||
683 | left, lower high to the right, high as high in the middle. | ||
684 | |||
685 | 172 | ||
686 | 00:12:53,730 ~-~-> 00:13:00,000 | ||
687 | It breaks that. Okay, so now we're on a bye, watch for | ||
688 | |||
689 | 173 | ||
690 | 00:13:00,000 ~-~-> 00:13:06,390 | ||
691 | scalping This is a swing high it's broken and we have to | ||
692 | |||
693 | 174 | ||
694 | 00:13:06,390 ~-~-> 00:13:10,590 | ||
695 | wait for a swing low to form after this is broken so we're | ||
696 | |||
697 | 175 | ||
698 | 00:13:10,590 ~-~-> 00:13:14,790 | ||
699 | going to be anticipating a retracement after this run up. So | ||
700 | |||
701 | 176 | ||
702 | 00:13:14,790 ~-~-> 00:13:21,480 | ||
703 | as price starts to drop down we have a preliminary swing low | ||
704 | |||
705 | 177 | ||
706 | 00:13:21,480 ~-~-> 00:13:25,560 | ||
707 | here Okay, so this candle is the third one we need to make | ||
708 | |||
709 | 178 | ||
710 | 00:13:25,560 ~-~-> 00:13:28,950 | ||
711 | sure we wait for price to trade through this candles high | ||
712 | |||
713 | 179 | ||
714 | 00:13:29,310 ~-~-> 00:13:32,970 | ||
715 | the very next day it doesn't do that. Okay, then we have | ||
716 | |||
717 | 180 | ||
718 | 00:13:32,970 ~-~-> 00:13:39,210 | ||
719 | another candle form a potential swing low here so this | ||
720 | |||
721 | 181 | ||
722 | 00:13:39,210 ~-~-> 00:13:41,370 | ||
723 | candle here we have to wait for this candle is high the | ||
724 | |||
725 | 182 | ||
726 | 00:13:41,370 ~-~-> 00:13:44,040 | ||
727 | trade through very next candle doesn't do it. It does it | ||
728 | |||
729 | 183 | ||
730 | 00:13:44,040 ~-~-> 00:13:49,230 | ||
731 | here. So now we can be a buyer here with a scout running | ||
732 | |||
733 | 184 | ||
734 | 00:13:49,230 ~-~-> 00:13:54,750 | ||
735 | previous day's high which is this one. Okay, so one July | ||
736 | |||
737 | 185 | ||
738 | 00:13:54,750 ~-~-> 00:14:00,630 | ||
739 | 24 2017. That high again coming in at 130 47 That's where | ||
740 | |||
741 | 186 | ||
742 | 00:14:00,630 ~-~-> 00:14:05,550 | ||
743 | the liquidity run is going to be right there. This candle on | ||
744 | |||
745 | 187 | ||
746 | 00:14:05,550 ~-~-> 00:14:08,970 | ||
747 | the 25th of July is where we'll be looking for the setup. | ||
748 | |||
749 | 188 | ||
750 | 00:14:14,250 ~-~-> 00:14:18,390 | ||
751 | Right there. Okay, and we're going to drop down into a | ||
752 | |||
753 | 189 | ||
754 | 00:14:18,390 ~-~-> 00:14:20,790 | ||
755 | smaller timeframe, we'll use a 15 minute timeframe. | ||
756 | |||
757 | 190 | ||
758 | 00:14:26,070 ~-~-> 00:14:30,930 | ||
759 | Okay. And scrunch this up with the date dividers and you | ||
760 | |||
761 | 191 | ||
762 | 00:14:30,930 ~-~-> 00:14:38,670 | ||
763 | guys can see it. So previous day's high is right here. So | ||
764 | |||
765 | 192 | ||
766 | 00:14:38,670 ~-~-> 00:14:42,660 | ||
767 | I'll put a horizontal line on the chart to facilitate that. | ||
768 | |||
769 | 193 | ||
770 | 00:14:46,590 ~-~-> 00:14:51,030 | ||
771 | Okay, so here's where the liquidity is we're running for | ||
772 | |||
773 | 194 | ||
774 | 00:14:51,150 ~-~-> 00:15:00,450 | ||
775 | 3057. Okay, this day here we're looking for a scenario To | ||
776 | |||
777 | 195 | ||
778 | 00:15:00,450 ~-~-> 00:15:11,670 | ||
779 | get long to run that liquidity pool. Okay, and we have this | ||
780 | |||
781 | 196 | ||
782 | 00:15:12,660 ~-~-> 00:15:16,230 | ||
783 | again, it's the liquidity poor risk reaching for previous | ||
784 | |||
785 | 197 | ||
786 | 00:15:16,230 ~-~-> 00:15:23,280 | ||
787 | day's high on this trading day when I use the market | ||
788 | |||
789 | 198 | ||
790 | 00:15:23,880 ~-~-> 00:15:28,380 | ||
791 | sessions, I'm looking for London setups in New York setups | ||
792 | |||
793 | 199 | ||
794 | 00:15:28,410 ~-~-> 00:15:33,240 | ||
795 | primarily, this is a London session low. Gonna let you see | ||
796 | |||
797 | 200 | ||
798 | 00:15:33,240 ~-~-> 00:15:40,950 | ||
799 | that here. It's in London and we're going to use that. As I | ||
800 | |||
801 | 201 | ||
802 | 00:15:40,950 ~-~-> 00:15:48,120 | ||
803 | mentioned in Volume One, I use session highs and lows. And | ||
804 | |||
805 | 202 | ||
806 | 00:15:48,120 ~-~-> 00:15:53,790 | ||
807 | this is the highest portion of the day in terms of a 15 | ||
808 | |||
809 | 203 | ||
810 | 00:15:53,790 ~-~-> 00:15:57,810 | ||
811 | minute candle. Just put it right here. You guys can see it | ||
812 | |||
813 | 204 | ||
814 | 00:15:57,810 ~-~-> 00:16:01,470 | ||
815 | so I'm using this one and this one framing the entire price. | ||
816 | |||
817 | 205 | ||
818 | 00:16:02,790 ~-~-> 00:16:06,000 | ||
819 | So as price starts to stay here I'm not concerned about | ||
820 | |||
821 | 206 | ||
822 | 00:16:06,000 ~-~-> 00:16:11,610 | ||
823 | anything until it gets down into the optimal trade entry 62% | ||
824 | |||
825 | 207 | ||
826 | 00:16:11,610 ~-~-> 00:16:17,310 | ||
827 | retracement level respectively 70.5 and 79% okay you can see | ||
828 | |||
829 | 208 | ||
830 | 00:16:17,310 ~-~-> 00:16:21,210 | ||
831 | price trades it hits it here. This candle comes in exactly | ||
832 | |||
833 | 209 | ||
834 | 00:16:21,210 ~-~-> 00:16:28,800 | ||
835 | 945 that's London and we're going into a nice run into | ||
836 | |||
837 | 210 | ||
838 | 00:16:29,250 ~-~-> 00:16:33,060 | ||
839 | previous day's high. Okay, so you can see that was a nice | ||
840 | |||
841 | 211 | ||
842 | 00:16:33,060 ~-~-> 00:16:39,240 | ||
843 | little scalp, it offered as much as 1020 3040 pips, to get | ||
844 | |||
845 | 212 | ||
846 | 00:16:39,240 ~-~-> 00:16:44,070 | ||
847 | to the high and if we look for 10 to 20 pips of sweep bar | ||
848 | |||
849 | 213 | ||
850 | 00:16:44,070 ~-~-> 00:16:50,880 | ||
851 | this high that takes us 1020 here, so 20 pips 40 pips 60 | ||
852 | |||
853 | 214 | ||
854 | 00:16:50,880 ~-~-> 00:16:57,030 | ||
855 | pips 70 pips or so in terms of potential price range. That | ||
856 | |||
857 | 215 | ||
858 | 00:16:57,030 ~-~-> 00:17:00,660 | ||
859 | in itself is it for the week for me, that would be I | ||
860 | |||
861 | 216 | ||
862 | 00:17:00,660 ~-~-> 00:17:03,210 | ||
863 | wouldn't need to do anything else. And it's hard to believe. | ||
864 | |||
865 | 217 | ||
866 | 00:17:03,930 ~-~-> 00:17:06,570 | ||
867 | But that's how I operate. I don't look for a whole lot of | ||
868 | |||
869 | 218 | ||
870 | 00:17:06,570 ~-~-> 00:17:09,840 | ||
871 | setups per week because I'm content with you doing one thing | ||
872 | |||
873 | 219 | ||
874 | 00:17:09,840 ~-~-> 00:17:14,760 | ||
875 | well, and there it is. Now, if this were a more conservative | ||
876 | |||
877 | 220 | ||
878 | 00:17:14,760 ~-~-> 00:17:18,630 | ||
879 | approach, you could be looking for the long down here based | ||
880 | |||
881 | 221 | ||
882 | 00:17:18,630 ~-~-> 00:17:23,250 | ||
883 | on the optimal trade entry and reaching just to the old | ||
884 | |||
885 | 222 | ||
886 | 00:17:23,250 ~-~-> 00:17:28,740 | ||
887 | high. Now if that's the case, say you're filled it, we'll | ||
888 | |||
889 | 223 | ||
890 | 00:17:28,740 ~-~-> 00:17:34,650 | ||
891 | just round it to 130 20 that again, is getting out at 57 | ||
892 | |||
893 | 224 | ||
894 | 00:17:36,150 ~-~-> 00:17:40,380 | ||
895 | it's 37 pips or so. Okay, almost 40 pips we'll say 40 pips. | ||
896 | |||
897 | 225 | ||
898 | 00:17:41,850 ~-~-> 00:17:44,700 | ||
899 | You only need to do one more trade for the week, pretend | ||
900 | |||
901 | 226 | ||
902 | 00:17:44,700 ~-~-> 00:17:51,120 | ||
903 | pips to get a 50 PIP net return for the week. Now, there's a | ||
904 | |||
905 | 227 | ||
906 | 00:17:51,120 ~-~-> 00:17:55,140 | ||
907 | lot of folks that will say, don't set targets don't set | ||
908 | |||
909 | 228 | ||
910 | 00:17:56,550 ~-~-> 00:18:00,660 | ||
911 | goals for daily or weekly because you don't Know what the | ||
912 | |||
913 | 229 | ||
914 | 00:18:00,660 ~-~-> 00:18:03,750 | ||
915 | markets going to do? Well, I would submit that that's | ||
916 | |||
917 | 230 | ||
918 | 00:18:03,840 ~-~-> 00:18:08,010 | ||
919 | partially true. We don't know with any assurity what the | ||
920 | |||
921 | 231 | ||
922 | 00:18:08,010 ~-~-> 00:18:11,700 | ||
923 | markets going to do. But we do have pretty strong | ||
924 | |||
925 | 232 | ||
926 | 00:18:11,700 ~-~-> 00:18:15,120 | ||
927 | probabilities of wherever the market may reach for. And if | ||
928 | |||
929 | 233 | ||
930 | 00:18:15,120 ~-~-> 00:18:18,360 | ||
931 | we can frame the idea of where we're trying to get in at | ||
932 | |||
933 | 234 | ||
934 | 00:18:18,360 ~-~-> 00:18:22,170 | ||
935 | based on time and price kill zone and optimal trade entry | ||
936 | |||
937 | 235 | ||
938 | 00:18:22,260 ~-~-> 00:18:25,680 | ||
939 | price, and where we're reaching for it, doesn't that not | ||
940 | |||
941 | 236 | ||
942 | 00:18:25,890 ~-~-> 00:18:29,610 | ||
943 | offer us a definitive way of determining what could be | ||
944 | |||
945 | 237 | ||
946 | 00:18:29,610 ~-~-> 00:18:33,360 | ||
947 | reasonably expected for that particular setup? And if we | ||
948 | |||
949 | 238 | ||
950 | 00:18:33,360 ~-~-> 00:18:36,360 | ||
951 | know that we're looking at intraday setups like this is | ||
952 | |||
953 | 239 | ||
954 | 00:18:36,360 ~-~-> 00:18:39,540 | ||
955 | typically five days per week, unless it's a holiday or the | ||
956 | |||
957 | 240 | ||
958 | 00:18:39,540 ~-~-> 00:18:42,840 | ||
959 | markets are not trading because of some other bank holiday | ||
960 | |||
961 | 241 | ||
962 | 00:18:42,840 ~-~-> 00:18:47,100 | ||
963 | whatever we don't want to trade it. We can see many | ||
964 | |||
965 | 242 | ||
966 | 00:18:47,100 ~-~-> 00:18:55,200 | ||
967 | instances where 25 to 50 pips is rather easy to get now. | ||
968 | |||
969 | 243 | ||
970 | 00:18:55,800 ~-~-> 00:18:59,340 | ||
971 | It's when we get into the I want to make 250 to 500 pips per | ||
972 | |||
973 | 244 | ||
974 | 00:18:59,340 ~-~-> 00:19:03,270 | ||
975 | week. Then it becomes a little daunting in terms of a task. | ||
976 | |||
977 | 245 | ||
978 | 00:19:03,510 ~-~-> 00:19:08,940 | ||
979 | So I think by focusing on 2025 pips per setup and an aiming | ||
980 | |||
981 | 246 | ||
982 | 00:19:08,940 ~-~-> 00:19:10,590 | ||
983 | for two good ones per week, | ||
984 | |||
985 | 247 | ||
986 | 00:19:11,850 ~-~-> 00:19:16,620 | ||
987 | I think 50 pips is a really low hanging fruit reachable, | ||
988 | |||
989 | 248 | ||
990 | 00:19:16,680 ~-~-> 00:19:20,970 | ||
991 | achievable and certainly realistic in the scope of a | ||
992 | |||
993 | 249 | ||
994 | 00:19:20,970 ~-~-> 00:19:24,810 | ||
995 | developing trader. Will you get it every week? No. Will you | ||
996 | |||
997 | 250 | ||
998 | 00:19:24,810 ~-~-> 00:19:28,140 | ||
999 | get it right out the gate starting using my concepts? No. | ||
1000 | |||
1001 | 251 | ||
1002 | 00:19:28,800 ~-~-> 00:19:32,490 | ||
1003 | But over time, you will eventually grow into that expectancy | ||
1004 | |||
1005 | 252 | ||
1006 | 00:19:32,490 ~-~-> 00:19:37,140 | ||
1007 | for a nice return of 50 pips per week. You can frame your | ||
1008 | |||
1009 | 253 | ||
1010 | 00:19:37,140 ~-~-> 00:19:38,400 | ||
1011 | entire career on that. |