Wiki source code of Mastering High Probability Scalping Vol 2 of 3.srt
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 00:00:08,610 ~-~-> 00:00:14,430 | ||
| 3 | ICT: Okay folks, welcome back. This is volume two of three, | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | 2 | ||
| 6 | 00:00:15,180 ~-~-> 00:00:19,350 | ||
| 7 | four mastering high probability scalping, focusing on | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | 3 | ||
| 10 | 00:00:19,350 ~-~-> 00:00:21,240 | ||
| 11 | previous day bank liquidity runs. | ||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | 4 | ||
| 14 | 00:00:27,540 ~-~-> 00:00:31,950 | ||
| 15 | Alright, so what we are reviewing the daily bias so that we | ||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | 5 | ||
| 18 | 00:00:31,950 ~-~-> 00:00:36,090 | ||
| 19 | everyone knows exactly what should be done. And I'm | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | 6 | ||
| 22 | 00:00:36,090 ~-~-> 00:00:40,470 | ||
| 23 | referring to a daily chart here. So when we're implementing | ||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | 7 | ||
| 26 | 00:00:40,500 ~-~-> 00:00:42,690 | ||
| 27 | the daily bias, what we're gonna be doing is on a daily | ||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | 8 | ||
| 30 | 00:00:42,690 ~-~-> 00:00:46,830 | ||
| 31 | chart, we're gonna be waiting for a swing high to form and | ||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | 9 | ||
| 34 | 00:00:46,830 ~-~-> 00:00:50,940 | ||
| 35 | to be broken this will be bullish, okay when we see a swing | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | 10 | ||
| 38 | 00:00:50,940 ~-~-> 00:00:56,010 | ||
| 39 | high broken downwards, a candle that has a lower high to the | ||
| 40 | |||
| 41 | 11 | ||
| 42 | 00:00:56,010 ~-~-> 00:00:59,760 | ||
| 43 | left of it, and the lower high to the right of it as seen | ||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | 12 | ||
| 46 | 00:00:59,760 ~-~-> 00:01:06,000 | ||
| 47 | here. Okay, if at anytime in the future, it's traded through | ||
| 48 | |||
| 49 | 13 | ||
| 50 | 00:01:07,230 ~-~-> 00:01:11,130 | ||
| 51 | when we have that we have a bullish stage. In other words, | ||
| 52 | |||
| 53 | 14 | ||
| 54 | 00:01:11,130 ~-~-> 00:01:15,810 | ||
| 55 | we anticipate a future Buying Opportunity doesn't mean the | ||
| 56 | |||
| 57 | 15 | ||
| 58 | 00:01:15,810 ~-~-> 00:01:20,400 | ||
| 59 | buy right there just means we are now on on alert to wait | ||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | 16 | ||
| 62 | 00:01:20,400 ~-~-> 00:01:26,700 | ||
| 63 | for a specific criteria criteria is going to be looking for | ||
| 64 | |||
| 65 | 17 | ||
| 66 | 00:01:26,700 ~-~-> 00:01:32,730 | ||
| 67 | a swing load form down here okay a swing low can is a candle | ||
| 68 | |||
| 69 | 18 | ||
| 70 | 00:01:32,730 ~-~-> 00:01:35,160 | ||
| 71 | that has a higher load to the left of it a higher load to | ||
| 72 | |||
| 73 | 19 | ||
| 74 | 00:01:35,160 ~-~-> 00:01:40,890 | ||
| 75 | the right of it again on a daily chart. key point here is | ||
| 76 | |||
| 77 | 20 | ||
| 78 | 00:01:41,520 ~-~-> 00:01:46,140 | ||
| 79 | this swing low should not take out a previous recent swing | ||
| 80 | |||
| 81 | 21 | ||
| 82 | 00:01:46,140 ~-~-> 00:01:52,440 | ||
| 83 | low okay. So if we have this criteria immediately after a | ||
| 84 | |||
| 85 | 22 | ||
| 86 | 00:01:52,440 ~-~-> 00:01:58,830 | ||
| 87 | swing high is broken. We have the probable optimal trade | ||
| 88 | |||
| 89 | 23 | ||
| 90 | 00:01:58,830 ~-~-> 00:02:04,200 | ||
| 91 | entry scenario By itself on a daily chart, okay, doesn't | ||
| 92 | |||
| 93 | 24 | ||
| 94 | 00:02:04,200 ~-~-> 00:02:06,660 | ||
| 95 | mean it has to line up with a 62 to seven times tracing | ||
| 96 | |||
| 97 | 25 | ||
| 98 | 00:02:06,660 ~-~-> 00:02:11,700 | ||
| 99 | level, this means that we are in effect, trading with a | ||
| 100 | |||
| 101 | 26 | ||
| 102 | 00:02:11,880 ~-~-> 00:02:17,370 | ||
| 103 | higher low after breaking a short term high so we have a | ||
| 104 | |||
| 105 | 27 | ||
| 106 | 00:02:17,370 ~-~-> 00:02:20,490 | ||
| 107 | break in market structure retracements. Therefore, the | ||
| 108 | |||
| 109 | 28 | ||
| 110 | 00:02:20,490 ~-~-> 00:02:24,630 | ||
| 111 | market should have an ability to find momentum on the | ||
| 112 | |||
| 113 | 29 | ||
| 114 | 00:02:24,630 ~-~-> 00:02:30,600 | ||
| 115 | upside, okay. When the swing low forms, we're going to be | ||
| 116 | |||
| 117 | 30 | ||
| 118 | 00:02:30,600 ~-~-> 00:02:34,770 | ||
| 119 | anticipating the third candle. That is this one here. It's | ||
| 120 | |||
| 121 | 31 | ||
| 122 | 00:02:34,770 ~-~-> 00:02:39,240 | ||
| 123 | high to be rated or traded through the very next day. So | ||
| 124 | |||
| 125 | 32 | ||
| 126 | 00:02:39,240 ~-~-> 00:02:42,540 | ||
| 127 | towards the next trading day where it opens, preferably, you | ||
| 128 | |||
| 129 | 33 | ||
| 130 | 00:02:42,540 ~-~-> 00:02:47,250 | ||
| 131 | want to see it open below the third candle the swing lows | ||
| 132 | |||
| 133 | 34 | ||
| 134 | 00:02:47,310 ~-~-> 00:02:53,580 | ||
| 135 | high. Okay, so your criterion, you want to see the swing low | ||
| 136 | |||
| 137 | 35 | ||
| 138 | 00:02:54,090 ~-~-> 00:02:58,650 | ||
| 139 | form without breaking a previous swing low immediately after | ||
| 140 | |||
| 141 | 36 | ||
| 142 | 00:02:59,370 ~-~-> 00:03:05,280 | ||
| 143 | a swing. is formed but breaking a previous swing high. Okay, | ||
| 144 | |||
| 145 | 37 | ||
| 146 | 00:03:05,280 ~-~-> 00:03:09,480 | ||
| 147 | so again the stage for a bullish scenario is anytime a swing | ||
| 148 | |||
| 149 | 38 | ||
| 150 | 00:03:09,480 ~-~-> 00:03:15,570 | ||
| 151 | high is broken and traded to a new high expected retracement | ||
| 152 | |||
| 153 | 39 | ||
| 154 | 00:03:16,110 ~-~-> 00:03:19,920 | ||
| 155 | wait for a daily swing low to form swing low should be a | ||
| 156 | |||
| 157 | 40 | ||
| 158 | 00:03:19,920 ~-~-> 00:03:24,870 | ||
| 159 | higher swing load in any recent previous short term swing | ||
| 160 | |||
| 161 | 41 | ||
| 162 | 00:03:24,870 ~-~-> 00:03:30,990 | ||
| 163 | low the third candle that makes the swing low that high you | ||
| 164 | |||
| 165 | 42 | ||
| 166 | 00:03:30,990 ~-~-> 00:03:37,020 | ||
| 167 | want to see the next candle open below that candles high and | ||
| 168 | |||
| 169 | 43 | ||
| 170 | 00:03:37,020 ~-~-> 00:03:41,070 | ||
| 171 | then anticipate the market to run through this candles Hi. | ||
| 172 | |||
| 173 | 44 | ||
| 174 | 00:03:44,610 ~-~-> 00:03:47,040 | ||
| 175 | We're gonna be looking for previous day's highs to be rated | ||
| 176 | |||
| 177 | 45 | ||
| 178 | 00:03:47,070 ~-~-> 00:03:51,420 | ||
| 179 | each day until a swing high on a daily forms or price | ||
| 180 | |||
| 181 | 46 | ||
| 182 | 00:03:51,420 ~-~-> 00:03:54,750 | ||
| 183 | reaches a key support resistance level. And I'll give an | ||
| 184 | |||
| 185 | 47 | ||
| 186 | 00:03:54,750 ~-~-> 00:03:58,620 | ||
| 187 | example what that would be the immediate candle after this | ||
| 188 | |||
| 189 | 48 | ||
| 190 | 00:03:58,620 ~-~-> 00:04:03,690 | ||
| 191 | particular days Maybe looking for a bullish scenario. Okay | ||
| 192 | |||
| 193 | 49 | ||
| 194 | 00:04:03,690 ~-~-> 00:04:07,650 | ||
| 195 | either in the London or the New York scenario to anticipate | ||
| 196 | |||
| 197 | 50 | ||
| 198 | 00:04:07,710 ~-~-> 00:04:11,400 | ||
| 199 | a raid on the previous day's high. The very next trading | ||
| 200 | |||
| 201 | 51 | ||
| 202 | 00:04:11,400 ~-~-> 00:04:15,030 | ||
| 203 | day, we would look for the same scenario again, looking for | ||
| 204 | |||
| 205 | 52 | ||
| 206 | 00:04:15,030 ~-~-> 00:04:18,570 | ||
| 207 | reasons to be bullish on a retracement lower, going higher | ||
| 208 | |||
| 209 | 53 | ||
| 210 | 00:04:18,930 ~-~-> 00:04:23,640 | ||
| 211 | reaching for ultimately to this old high, this would be a | ||
| 212 | |||
| 213 | 54 | ||
| 214 | 00:04:23,670 ~-~-> 00:04:28,410 | ||
| 215 | area of resistance, okay or if it trades to that high and | ||
| 216 | |||
| 217 | 55 | ||
| 218 | 00:04:28,410 ~-~-> 00:04:31,890 | ||
| 219 | through it we'd still maintain looking for bullish scenarios | ||
| 220 | |||
| 221 | 56 | ||
| 222 | 00:04:32,340 ~-~-> 00:04:36,720 | ||
| 223 | buying looking for previous day's highs to be taken out. Or | ||
| 224 | |||
| 225 | 57 | ||
| 226 | 00:04:36,720 ~-~-> 00:04:40,830 | ||
| 227 | if we have price rally up to a degree either at this level | ||
| 228 | |||
| 229 | 58 | ||
| 230 | 00:04:40,830 ~-~-> 00:04:45,210 | ||
| 231 | or before it and creating a swing high. Once that forms. We | ||
| 232 | |||
| 233 | 59 | ||
| 234 | 00:04:45,210 ~-~-> 00:04:48,450 | ||
| 235 | have to wait for that swing high to be broke on the upside. | ||
| 236 | |||
| 237 | 60 | ||
| 238 | 00:04:48,930 ~-~-> 00:04:51,750 | ||
| 239 | Okay. There's going to be a lot of missed opportunities | ||
| 240 | |||
| 241 | 61 | ||
| 242 | 00:04:51,780 ~-~-> 00:04:55,800 | ||
| 243 | admittedly with this but it gives you a specific criteria on | ||
| 244 | |||
| 245 | 62 | ||
| 246 | 00:04:55,800 ~-~-> 00:04:56,400 | ||
| 247 | the work within | ||
| 248 | |||
| 249 | 63 | ||
| 250 | 00:05:02,370 ~-~-> 00:05:07,680 | ||
| 251 | Okay, employing the daily bias This is why it's bearish and | ||
| 252 | |||
| 253 | 64 | ||
| 254 | 00:05:07,680 ~-~-> 00:05:11,730 | ||
| 255 | we waiting again on the daily chart for a swing low on a | ||
| 256 | |||
| 257 | 65 | ||
| 258 | 00:05:11,730 ~-~-> 00:05:15,990 | ||
| 259 | daily to be broken. So we have a swing low here, okay again, | ||
| 260 | |||
| 261 | 66 | ||
| 262 | 00:05:16,140 ~-~-> 00:05:19,920 | ||
| 263 | a daily candle that has a higher low to the left of it and a | ||
| 264 | |||
| 265 | 67 | ||
| 266 | 00:05:19,920 ~-~-> 00:05:24,030 | ||
| 267 | higher low to the right of it eventually as price trades | ||
| 268 | |||
| 269 | 68 | ||
| 270 | 00:05:24,030 ~-~-> 00:05:29,280 | ||
| 271 | through this, this break in market structure sets the stage | ||
| 272 | |||
| 273 | 69 | ||
| 274 | 00:05:29,280 ~-~-> 00:05:33,870 | ||
| 275 | for a bearish market condition. Okay, so we're kind of like | ||
| 276 | |||
| 277 | 70 | ||
| 278 | 00:05:33,870 ~-~-> 00:05:37,680 | ||
| 279 | alerted to waiting for a sell scenario. We wait for a | ||
| 280 | |||
| 281 | 71 | ||
| 282 | 00:05:37,680 ~-~-> 00:05:42,330 | ||
| 283 | retracement when we get the daily swing high formed. The | ||
| 284 | |||
| 285 | 72 | ||
| 286 | 00:05:42,330 ~-~-> 00:05:46,350 | ||
| 287 | third candle Okay, that makes a swing high. We're going to | ||
| 288 | |||
| 289 | 73 | ||
| 290 | 00:05:46,350 ~-~-> 00:05:49,440 | ||
| 291 | be anticipating that low to be violated the very next | ||
| 292 | |||
| 293 | 74 | ||
| 294 | 00:05:49,440 ~-~-> 00:05:52,440 | ||
| 295 | trading day. key point is we don't want to see this swing | ||
| 296 | |||
| 297 | 75 | ||
| 298 | 00:05:52,440 ~-~-> 00:05:56,670 | ||
| 299 | high break a previous swing high immediately before the | ||
| 300 | |||
| 301 | 76 | ||
| 302 | 00:05:56,670 ~-~-> 00:06:01,140 | ||
| 303 | swing low that has broken a previous swing Okay so what | ||
| 304 | |||
| 305 | 77 | ||
| 306 | 00:06:01,140 ~-~-> 00:06:06,180 | ||
| 307 | we're doing is we're looking for a swing low broken here so | ||
| 308 | |||
| 309 | 78 | ||
| 310 | 00:06:06,180 ~-~-> 00:06:08,550 | ||
| 311 | now we have the ability to see the market trade to a new a | ||
| 312 | |||
| 313 | 79 | ||
| 314 | 00:06:08,550 ~-~-> 00:06:14,460 | ||
| 315 | new low then it retraces but will not break a swing high. So | ||
| 316 | |||
| 317 | 80 | ||
| 318 | 00:06:14,460 ~-~-> 00:06:21,240 | ||
| 319 | now we're getting that three quarterback retracement. Okay. | ||
| 320 | |||
| 321 | 81 | ||
| 322 | 00:06:21,240 ~-~-> 00:06:25,200 | ||
| 323 | So by itself it's like an optimal trade entry doesn't have | ||
| 324 | |||
| 325 | 82 | ||
| 326 | 00:06:25,200 ~-~-> 00:06:28,530 | ||
| 327 | to be 262 to seven times and tracing level. It's better if | ||
| 328 | |||
| 329 | 83 | ||
| 330 | 00:06:28,530 ~-~-> 00:06:32,550 | ||
| 331 | it does, but it doesn't require it. You want to see the | ||
| 332 | |||
| 333 | 84 | ||
| 334 | 00:06:32,550 ~-~-> 00:06:36,180 | ||
| 335 | market trade up until it creates a daily swing high. When | ||
| 336 | |||
| 337 | 85 | ||
| 338 | 00:06:36,180 ~-~-> 00:06:40,020 | ||
| 339 | that third candle forms and it's closed very next trading | ||
| 340 | |||
| 341 | 86 | ||
| 342 | 00:06:40,020 ~-~-> 00:06:43,740 | ||
| 343 | day, you will be watching for price to make an attempt to | ||
| 344 | |||
| 345 | 87 | ||
| 346 | 00:06:43,740 ~-~-> 00:06:47,640 | ||
| 347 | trade through this candles low and that remains the bias | ||
| 348 | |||
| 349 | 88 | ||
| 350 | 00:06:47,670 ~-~-> 00:06:51,480 | ||
| 351 | each trading day until a swing low forms or we trade down to | ||
| 352 | |||
| 353 | 89 | ||
| 354 | 00:06:51,480 ~-~-> 00:06:57,840 | ||
| 355 | this old low. Okay, or another significant low. So again, | ||
| 356 | |||
| 357 | 90 | ||
| 358 | 00:06:57,990 ~-~-> 00:07:00,960 | ||
| 359 | summary it's we're looking for Swing loaded form on the | ||
| 360 | |||
| 361 | 91 | ||
| 362 | 00:07:00,960 ~-~-> 00:07:06,750 | ||
| 363 | daily chart and then it be broken. Then we're looking for a | ||
| 364 | |||
| 365 | 92 | ||
| 366 | 00:07:06,750 ~-~-> 00:07:10,050 | ||
| 367 | swing high to form but does not break a recent swing high. | ||
| 368 | |||
| 369 | 93 | ||
| 370 | 00:07:10,530 ~-~-> 00:07:13,500 | ||
| 371 | So here's a swing high, it doesn't come back to clear or | ||
| 372 | |||
| 373 | 94 | ||
| 374 | 00:07:13,500 ~-~-> 00:07:18,840 | ||
| 375 | break a previous swing high. When the swing high forms, we | ||
| 376 | |||
| 377 | 95 | ||
| 378 | 00:07:18,840 ~-~-> 00:07:22,590 | ||
| 379 | anticipate the third daily candle in the swing high right | ||
| 380 | |||
| 381 | 96 | ||
| 382 | 00:07:22,590 ~-~-> 00:07:26,370 | ||
| 383 | here. We look for its low to be rated or traded through the | ||
| 384 | |||
| 385 | 97 | ||
| 386 | 00:07:26,370 ~-~-> 00:07:30,930 | ||
| 387 | following day. And we look for the previous day's low to be | ||
| 388 | |||
| 389 | 98 | ||
| 390 | 00:07:30,930 ~-~-> 00:07:35,550 | ||
| 391 | rated each day until a new swing low on a daily forms, or | ||
| 392 | |||
| 393 | 99 | ||
| 394 | 00:07:35,550 ~-~-> 00:07:41,490 | ||
| 395 | price reaches a key support resistance level. Now, you're | ||
| 396 | |||
| 397 | 100 | ||
| 398 | 00:07:41,490 ~-~-> 00:07:44,940 | ||
| 399 | not going to have a set up every single trading day. Okay, | ||
| 400 | |||
| 401 | 101 | ||
| 402 | 00:07:45,000 ~-~-> 00:07:49,440 | ||
| 403 | I've gotten a lot of emails so far. Since I've produced the | ||
| 404 | |||
| 405 | 102 | ||
| 406 | 00:07:49,440 ~-~-> 00:07:53,490 | ||
| 407 | first volume of this three part series. And the common | ||
| 408 | |||
| 409 | 103 | ||
| 410 | 00:07:53,490 ~-~-> 00:07:57,690 | ||
| 411 | complaint. I'm getting his I'm not getting a set up every | ||
| 412 | |||
| 413 | 104 | ||
| 414 | 00:07:57,690 ~-~-> 00:08:02,970 | ||
| 415 | day and it's not been promised, okay, if you look at every | ||
| 416 | |||
| 417 | 105 | ||
| 418 | 00:08:03,570 ~-~-> 00:08:08,040 | ||
| 419 | major that's paired against the dollar, you can get about | ||
| 420 | |||
| 421 | 106 | ||
| 422 | 00:08:08,040 ~-~-> 00:08:13,620 | ||
| 423 | three to four solid setups per week. Now that means that | ||
| 424 | |||
| 425 | 107 | ||
| 426 | 00:08:13,620 ~-~-> 00:08:15,900 | ||
| 427 | you're probably not going to get a set up every single train | ||
| 428 | |||
| 429 | 108 | ||
| 430 | 00:08:15,900 ~-~-> 00:08:20,430 | ||
| 431 | day, chances are one pair among all the ones that are | ||
| 432 | |||
| 433 | 109 | ||
| 434 | 00:08:20,430 ~-~-> 00:08:24,630 | ||
| 435 | available will provide you a setup to study. So you can | ||
| 436 | |||
| 437 | 110 | ||
| 438 | 00:08:24,630 ~-~-> 00:08:29,040 | ||
| 439 | practice in your demo account with it. The emphasis is for | ||
| 440 | |||
| 441 | 111 | ||
| 442 | 00:08:29,040 ~-~-> 00:08:33,900 | ||
| 443 | you to remember that you only need about 25 pips or so per | ||
| 444 | |||
| 445 | 112 | ||
| 446 | 00:08:33,900 ~-~-> 00:08:38,490 | ||
| 447 | week. And if you're 2% of your account, and it may be high, | ||
| 448 | |||
| 449 | 113 | ||
| 450 | 00:08:38,580 ~-~-> 00:08:42,450 | ||
| 451 | admittedly, for some of you, but if you have grown in your | ||
| 452 | |||
| 453 | 114 | ||
| 454 | 00:08:42,450 ~-~-> 00:08:45,120 | ||
| 455 | understanding about what I'm teaching, and you're willing to | ||
| 456 | |||
| 457 | 115 | ||
| 458 | 00:08:45,120 ~-~-> 00:08:50,580 | ||
| 459 | risk 2% it takes a little bit less than 25 pips per week to | ||
| 460 | |||
| 461 | 116 | ||
| 462 | 00:08:50,580 ~-~-> 00:08:55,230 | ||
| 463 | double your account or make 6% compounded monthly. And I | ||
| 464 | |||
| 465 | 117 | ||
| 466 | 00:08:55,230 ~-~-> 00:08:58,800 | ||
| 467 | think that's the objective that folks should be looking for | ||
| 468 | |||
| 469 | 118 | ||
| 470 | 00:08:58,800 ~-~-> 00:09:03,120 | ||
| 471 | when they're new. Because it's realistic, it's low, but yet | ||
| 472 | |||
| 473 | 119 | ||
| 474 | 00:09:03,120 ~-~-> 00:09:06,510 | ||
| 475 | it still doubles the account over the course of a 12 month, | ||
| 476 | |||
| 477 | 120 | ||
| 478 | 00:09:07,110 ~-~-> 00:09:13,230 | ||
| 479 | year. So, if we're looking for one good setup that would | ||
| 480 | |||
| 481 | 121 | ||
| 482 | 00:09:13,230 ~-~-> 00:09:18,420 | ||
| 483 | yield that 25 pips or so you only need one scalp. One setup | ||
| 484 | |||
| 485 | 122 | ||
| 486 | 00:09:18,420 ~-~-> 00:09:25,440 | ||
| 487 | that does that. Now I started the current teaching week on | ||
| 488 | |||
| 489 | 123 | ||
| 490 | 00:09:25,440 ~-~-> 00:09:29,880 | ||
| 491 | Twitter. Kind of like building the idea of making 50 pips | ||
| 492 | |||
| 493 | 124 | ||
| 494 | 00:09:29,880 ~-~-> 00:09:34,410 | ||
| 495 | per week. If you frame your scalps in such a way that it | ||
| 496 | |||
| 497 | 125 | ||
| 498 | 00:09:34,410 ~-~-> 00:09:38,490 | ||
| 499 | allows you to aim for 25 pips you only really need two | ||
| 500 | |||
| 501 | 126 | ||
| 502 | 00:09:38,490 ~-~-> 00:09:42,930 | ||
| 503 | setups per week, don't you? Now, I like that model | ||
| 504 | |||
| 505 | 127 | ||
| 506 | 00:09:42,930 ~-~-> 00:09:47,100 | ||
| 507 | personally, because it's very close to what I do as a short | ||
| 508 | |||
| 509 | 128 | ||
| 510 | 00:09:47,100 ~-~-> 00:09:48,270 | ||
| 511 | term or intraday trader. | ||
| 512 | |||
| 513 | 129 | ||
| 514 | 00:09:49,620 ~-~-> 00:09:52,530 | ||
| 515 | I know the likelihood is I want to be trading on Tuesdays | ||
| 516 | |||
| 517 | 130 | ||
| 518 | 00:09:52,530 ~-~-> 00:09:55,890 | ||
| 519 | and Wednesdays, if I can get my entire weekly objective | ||
| 520 | |||
| 521 | 131 | ||
| 522 | 00:09:55,890 ~-~-> 00:09:59,880 | ||
| 523 | which is 50 to 75 pips per week, if I can get that done in | ||
| 524 | |||
| 525 | 132 | ||
| 526 | 00:09:59,880 ~-~-> 00:10:02,280 | ||
| 527 | one day then I won't do any more trading after that, | ||
| 528 | |||
| 529 | 133 | ||
| 530 | 00:10:02,310 ~-~-> 00:10:05,550 | ||
| 531 | regardless of what day of the week it is. But usually I hone | ||
| 532 | |||
| 533 | 134 | ||
| 534 | 00:10:05,550 ~-~-> 00:10:07,620 | ||
| 535 | in on Tuesday and Wednesday because they're primarily the | ||
| 536 | |||
| 537 | 135 | ||
| 538 | 00:10:07,620 ~-~-> 00:10:11,550 | ||
| 539 | best days, whether bullish or bearish. If it's bullish for | ||
| 540 | |||
| 541 | 136 | ||
| 542 | 00:10:11,550 ~-~-> 00:10:15,060 | ||
| 543 | the week, then I'm looking for the weekly low to form around | ||
| 544 | |||
| 545 | 137 | ||
| 546 | 00:10:15,090 ~-~-> 00:10:20,730 | ||
| 547 | Tuesday or Wednesday's New York open. If I can anticipate a | ||
| 548 | |||
| 549 | 138 | ||
| 550 | 00:10:20,730 ~-~-> 00:10:26,220 | ||
| 551 | lower close or weekly bearish candle, shooting with an | ||
| 552 | |||
| 553 | 139 | ||
| 554 | 00:10:26,220 ~-~-> 00:10:28,050 | ||
| 555 | expectation that we're going to be seeing lower prices by | ||
| 556 | |||
| 557 | 140 | ||
| 558 | 00:10:28,050 ~-~-> 00:10:31,680 | ||
| 559 | Friday's close relative to Sunday's opening, then I'll be | ||
| 560 | |||
| 561 | 141 | ||
| 562 | 00:10:31,680 ~-~-> 00:10:34,800 | ||
| 563 | looking for Tuesday or Wednesday's price action to create | ||
| 564 | |||
| 565 | 142 | ||
| 566 | 00:10:34,800 ~-~-> 00:10:38,160 | ||
| 567 | the high of the week. So if I can trade in sync with that | ||
| 568 | |||
| 569 | 143 | ||
| 570 | 00:10:38,160 ~-~-> 00:10:45,540 | ||
| 571 | idea. It also formulates a lot more conviction and | ||
| 572 | |||
| 573 | 144 | ||
| 574 | 00:10:45,540 ~-~-> 00:10:48,180 | ||
| 575 | confidence behind the setups that I'm looking to trade | ||
| 576 | |||
| 577 | 145 | ||
| 578 | 00:10:48,210 ~-~-> 00:10:50,910 | ||
| 579 | especially with what's being described here. It's a rather | ||
| 580 | |||
| 581 | 146 | ||
| 582 | 00:10:50,910 ~-~-> 00:10:54,930 | ||
| 583 | simplistic approach. It may have been an oversimplification | ||
| 584 | |||
| 585 | 147 | ||
| 586 | 00:10:54,960 ~-~-> 00:10:58,800 | ||
| 587 | on my part, by way of creating this diagram but from an | ||
| 588 | |||
| 589 | 148 | ||
| 590 | 00:10:58,800 ~-~-> 00:11:02,160 | ||
| 591 | internal standpoint, however, View the marketplace, this is | ||
| 592 | |||
| 593 | 149 | ||
| 594 | 00:11:02,190 ~-~-> 00:11:05,850 | ||
| 595 | what I'm looking for. Okay? So if I see it on the daily | ||
| 596 | |||
| 597 | 150 | ||
| 598 | 00:11:05,850 ~-~-> 00:11:10,620 | ||
| 599 | chart, chances are, the daily chart will probably sustain | ||
| 600 | |||
| 601 | 151 | ||
| 602 | 00:11:10,620 ~-~-> 00:11:14,790 | ||
| 603 | the move for a few days, and you'll only need one trading | ||
| 604 | |||
| 605 | 152 | ||
| 606 | 00:11:14,790 ~-~-> 00:11:17,670 | ||
| 607 | day. Okay, so if you have a scenario that's bullish or | ||
| 608 | |||
| 609 | 153 | ||
| 610 | 00:11:17,670 ~-~-> 00:11:20,100 | ||
| 611 | bearish relative to what I just described here so far in | ||
| 612 | |||
| 613 | 154 | ||
| 614 | 00:11:20,100 ~-~-> 00:11:24,810 | ||
| 615 | this video, you chances are you're probably gonna have one | ||
| 616 | |||
| 617 | 155 | ||
| 618 | 00:11:24,810 ~-~-> 00:11:29,370 | ||
| 619 | day's worth of momentum. And that's all you need. So every | ||
| 620 | |||
| 621 | 156 | ||
| 622 | 00:11:29,370 ~-~-> 00:11:33,270 | ||
| 623 | single pair does not move lockstep to one another. They're | ||
| 624 | |||
| 625 | 157 | ||
| 626 | 00:11:33,270 ~-~-> 00:11:37,470 | ||
| 627 | not always moving in tandem. So what may be a good pair of | ||
| 628 | |||
| 629 | 158 | ||
| 630 | 00:11:37,470 ~-~-> 00:11:41,700 | ||
| 631 | trade today may not be a pair that's really good to trade | ||
| 632 | |||
| 633 | 159 | ||
| 634 | 00:11:41,700 ~-~-> 00:11:46,680 | ||
| 635 | tomorrow, but another pair may move in equal or better | ||
| 636 | |||
| 637 | 160 | ||
| 638 | 00:11:46,680 ~-~-> 00:11:51,570 | ||
| 639 | fashion. In other words, the setups are plenty, but you have | ||
| 640 | |||
| 641 | 161 | ||
| 642 | 00:11:51,570 ~-~-> 00:11:56,250 | ||
| 643 | to allow them to be presented in price action from the daily | ||
| 644 | |||
| 645 | 162 | ||
| 646 | 00:11:56,250 ~-~-> 00:12:01,170 | ||
| 647 | chart and then not forcing it. So stay Look over at the | ||
| 648 | |||
| 649 | 163 | ||
| 650 | 00:12:01,170 ~-~-> 00:12:03,870 | ||
| 651 | charts, I'll give you an example of what it looks like. And | ||
| 652 | |||
| 653 | 164 | ||
| 654 | 00:12:03,870 ~-~-> 00:12:11,070 | ||
| 655 | we can use the kill zones. Okay, we're looking at the cable, | ||
| 656 | |||
| 657 | 165 | ||
| 658 | 00:12:11,190 ~-~-> 00:12:16,170 | ||
| 659 | the daily chart. Now this scrolled through just found a | ||
| 660 | |||
| 661 | 166 | ||
| 662 | 00:12:16,170 ~-~-> 00:12:18,510 | ||
| 663 | random place, it doesn't make a difference where we start | ||
| 664 | |||
| 665 | 167 | ||
| 666 | 00:12:18,510 ~-~-> 00:12:25,410 | ||
| 667 | out. But I want you to take a look at the price action here. | ||
| 668 | |||
| 669 | 168 | ||
| 670 | 00:12:26,340 ~-~-> 00:12:34,680 | ||
| 671 | And then we're going to look at this swing low, right here, | ||
| 672 | |||
| 673 | 169 | ||
| 674 | 00:12:35,610 ~-~-> 00:12:41,100 | ||
| 675 | and it's on the heels of a previous short term high. | ||
| 676 | |||
| 677 | 170 | ||
| 678 | 00:12:46,380 ~-~-> 00:12:49,860 | ||
| 679 | Okay, so we have a short term high here. Lower high to the | ||
| 680 | |||
| 681 | 171 | ||
| 682 | 00:12:49,860 ~-~-> 00:12:53,100 | ||
| 683 | left, lower high to the right, high as high in the middle. | ||
| 684 | |||
| 685 | 172 | ||
| 686 | 00:12:53,730 ~-~-> 00:13:00,000 | ||
| 687 | It breaks that. Okay, so now we're on a bye, watch for | ||
| 688 | |||
| 689 | 173 | ||
| 690 | 00:13:00,000 ~-~-> 00:13:06,390 | ||
| 691 | scalping This is a swing high it's broken and we have to | ||
| 692 | |||
| 693 | 174 | ||
| 694 | 00:13:06,390 ~-~-> 00:13:10,590 | ||
| 695 | wait for a swing low to form after this is broken so we're | ||
| 696 | |||
| 697 | 175 | ||
| 698 | 00:13:10,590 ~-~-> 00:13:14,790 | ||
| 699 | going to be anticipating a retracement after this run up. So | ||
| 700 | |||
| 701 | 176 | ||
| 702 | 00:13:14,790 ~-~-> 00:13:21,480 | ||
| 703 | as price starts to drop down we have a preliminary swing low | ||
| 704 | |||
| 705 | 177 | ||
| 706 | 00:13:21,480 ~-~-> 00:13:25,560 | ||
| 707 | here Okay, so this candle is the third one we need to make | ||
| 708 | |||
| 709 | 178 | ||
| 710 | 00:13:25,560 ~-~-> 00:13:28,950 | ||
| 711 | sure we wait for price to trade through this candles high | ||
| 712 | |||
| 713 | 179 | ||
| 714 | 00:13:29,310 ~-~-> 00:13:32,970 | ||
| 715 | the very next day it doesn't do that. Okay, then we have | ||
| 716 | |||
| 717 | 180 | ||
| 718 | 00:13:32,970 ~-~-> 00:13:39,210 | ||
| 719 | another candle form a potential swing low here so this | ||
| 720 | |||
| 721 | 181 | ||
| 722 | 00:13:39,210 ~-~-> 00:13:41,370 | ||
| 723 | candle here we have to wait for this candle is high the | ||
| 724 | |||
| 725 | 182 | ||
| 726 | 00:13:41,370 ~-~-> 00:13:44,040 | ||
| 727 | trade through very next candle doesn't do it. It does it | ||
| 728 | |||
| 729 | 183 | ||
| 730 | 00:13:44,040 ~-~-> 00:13:49,230 | ||
| 731 | here. So now we can be a buyer here with a scout running | ||
| 732 | |||
| 733 | 184 | ||
| 734 | 00:13:49,230 ~-~-> 00:13:54,750 | ||
| 735 | previous day's high which is this one. Okay, so one July | ||
| 736 | |||
| 737 | 185 | ||
| 738 | 00:13:54,750 ~-~-> 00:14:00,630 | ||
| 739 | 24 2017. That high again coming in at 130 47 That's where | ||
| 740 | |||
| 741 | 186 | ||
| 742 | 00:14:00,630 ~-~-> 00:14:05,550 | ||
| 743 | the liquidity run is going to be right there. This candle on | ||
| 744 | |||
| 745 | 187 | ||
| 746 | 00:14:05,550 ~-~-> 00:14:08,970 | ||
| 747 | the 25th of July is where we'll be looking for the setup. | ||
| 748 | |||
| 749 | 188 | ||
| 750 | 00:14:14,250 ~-~-> 00:14:18,390 | ||
| 751 | Right there. Okay, and we're going to drop down into a | ||
| 752 | |||
| 753 | 189 | ||
| 754 | 00:14:18,390 ~-~-> 00:14:20,790 | ||
| 755 | smaller timeframe, we'll use a 15 minute timeframe. | ||
| 756 | |||
| 757 | 190 | ||
| 758 | 00:14:26,070 ~-~-> 00:14:30,930 | ||
| 759 | Okay. And scrunch this up with the date dividers and you | ||
| 760 | |||
| 761 | 191 | ||
| 762 | 00:14:30,930 ~-~-> 00:14:38,670 | ||
| 763 | guys can see it. So previous day's high is right here. So | ||
| 764 | |||
| 765 | 192 | ||
| 766 | 00:14:38,670 ~-~-> 00:14:42,660 | ||
| 767 | I'll put a horizontal line on the chart to facilitate that. | ||
| 768 | |||
| 769 | 193 | ||
| 770 | 00:14:46,590 ~-~-> 00:14:51,030 | ||
| 771 | Okay, so here's where the liquidity is we're running for | ||
| 772 | |||
| 773 | 194 | ||
| 774 | 00:14:51,150 ~-~-> 00:15:00,450 | ||
| 775 | 3057. Okay, this day here we're looking for a scenario To | ||
| 776 | |||
| 777 | 195 | ||
| 778 | 00:15:00,450 ~-~-> 00:15:11,670 | ||
| 779 | get long to run that liquidity pool. Okay, and we have this | ||
| 780 | |||
| 781 | 196 | ||
| 782 | 00:15:12,660 ~-~-> 00:15:16,230 | ||
| 783 | again, it's the liquidity poor risk reaching for previous | ||
| 784 | |||
| 785 | 197 | ||
| 786 | 00:15:16,230 ~-~-> 00:15:23,280 | ||
| 787 | day's high on this trading day when I use the market | ||
| 788 | |||
| 789 | 198 | ||
| 790 | 00:15:23,880 ~-~-> 00:15:28,380 | ||
| 791 | sessions, I'm looking for London setups in New York setups | ||
| 792 | |||
| 793 | 199 | ||
| 794 | 00:15:28,410 ~-~-> 00:15:33,240 | ||
| 795 | primarily, this is a London session low. Gonna let you see | ||
| 796 | |||
| 797 | 200 | ||
| 798 | 00:15:33,240 ~-~-> 00:15:40,950 | ||
| 799 | that here. It's in London and we're going to use that. As I | ||
| 800 | |||
| 801 | 201 | ||
| 802 | 00:15:40,950 ~-~-> 00:15:48,120 | ||
| 803 | mentioned in Volume One, I use session highs and lows. And | ||
| 804 | |||
| 805 | 202 | ||
| 806 | 00:15:48,120 ~-~-> 00:15:53,790 | ||
| 807 | this is the highest portion of the day in terms of a 15 | ||
| 808 | |||
| 809 | 203 | ||
| 810 | 00:15:53,790 ~-~-> 00:15:57,810 | ||
| 811 | minute candle. Just put it right here. You guys can see it | ||
| 812 | |||
| 813 | 204 | ||
| 814 | 00:15:57,810 ~-~-> 00:16:01,470 | ||
| 815 | so I'm using this one and this one framing the entire price. | ||
| 816 | |||
| 817 | 205 | ||
| 818 | 00:16:02,790 ~-~-> 00:16:06,000 | ||
| 819 | So as price starts to stay here I'm not concerned about | ||
| 820 | |||
| 821 | 206 | ||
| 822 | 00:16:06,000 ~-~-> 00:16:11,610 | ||
| 823 | anything until it gets down into the optimal trade entry 62% | ||
| 824 | |||
| 825 | 207 | ||
| 826 | 00:16:11,610 ~-~-> 00:16:17,310 | ||
| 827 | retracement level respectively 70.5 and 79% okay you can see | ||
| 828 | |||
| 829 | 208 | ||
| 830 | 00:16:17,310 ~-~-> 00:16:21,210 | ||
| 831 | price trades it hits it here. This candle comes in exactly | ||
| 832 | |||
| 833 | 209 | ||
| 834 | 00:16:21,210 ~-~-> 00:16:28,800 | ||
| 835 | 945 that's London and we're going into a nice run into | ||
| 836 | |||
| 837 | 210 | ||
| 838 | 00:16:29,250 ~-~-> 00:16:33,060 | ||
| 839 | previous day's high. Okay, so you can see that was a nice | ||
| 840 | |||
| 841 | 211 | ||
| 842 | 00:16:33,060 ~-~-> 00:16:39,240 | ||
| 843 | little scalp, it offered as much as 1020 3040 pips, to get | ||
| 844 | |||
| 845 | 212 | ||
| 846 | 00:16:39,240 ~-~-> 00:16:44,070 | ||
| 847 | to the high and if we look for 10 to 20 pips of sweep bar | ||
| 848 | |||
| 849 | 213 | ||
| 850 | 00:16:44,070 ~-~-> 00:16:50,880 | ||
| 851 | this high that takes us 1020 here, so 20 pips 40 pips 60 | ||
| 852 | |||
| 853 | 214 | ||
| 854 | 00:16:50,880 ~-~-> 00:16:57,030 | ||
| 855 | pips 70 pips or so in terms of potential price range. That | ||
| 856 | |||
| 857 | 215 | ||
| 858 | 00:16:57,030 ~-~-> 00:17:00,660 | ||
| 859 | in itself is it for the week for me, that would be I | ||
| 860 | |||
| 861 | 216 | ||
| 862 | 00:17:00,660 ~-~-> 00:17:03,210 | ||
| 863 | wouldn't need to do anything else. And it's hard to believe. | ||
| 864 | |||
| 865 | 217 | ||
| 866 | 00:17:03,930 ~-~-> 00:17:06,570 | ||
| 867 | But that's how I operate. I don't look for a whole lot of | ||
| 868 | |||
| 869 | 218 | ||
| 870 | 00:17:06,570 ~-~-> 00:17:09,840 | ||
| 871 | setups per week because I'm content with you doing one thing | ||
| 872 | |||
| 873 | 219 | ||
| 874 | 00:17:09,840 ~-~-> 00:17:14,760 | ||
| 875 | well, and there it is. Now, if this were a more conservative | ||
| 876 | |||
| 877 | 220 | ||
| 878 | 00:17:14,760 ~-~-> 00:17:18,630 | ||
| 879 | approach, you could be looking for the long down here based | ||
| 880 | |||
| 881 | 221 | ||
| 882 | 00:17:18,630 ~-~-> 00:17:23,250 | ||
| 883 | on the optimal trade entry and reaching just to the old | ||
| 884 | |||
| 885 | 222 | ||
| 886 | 00:17:23,250 ~-~-> 00:17:28,740 | ||
| 887 | high. Now if that's the case, say you're filled it, we'll | ||
| 888 | |||
| 889 | 223 | ||
| 890 | 00:17:28,740 ~-~-> 00:17:34,650 | ||
| 891 | just round it to 130 20 that again, is getting out at 57 | ||
| 892 | |||
| 893 | 224 | ||
| 894 | 00:17:36,150 ~-~-> 00:17:40,380 | ||
| 895 | it's 37 pips or so. Okay, almost 40 pips we'll say 40 pips. | ||
| 896 | |||
| 897 | 225 | ||
| 898 | 00:17:41,850 ~-~-> 00:17:44,700 | ||
| 899 | You only need to do one more trade for the week, pretend | ||
| 900 | |||
| 901 | 226 | ||
| 902 | 00:17:44,700 ~-~-> 00:17:51,120 | ||
| 903 | pips to get a 50 PIP net return for the week. Now, there's a | ||
| 904 | |||
| 905 | 227 | ||
| 906 | 00:17:51,120 ~-~-> 00:17:55,140 | ||
| 907 | lot of folks that will say, don't set targets don't set | ||
| 908 | |||
| 909 | 228 | ||
| 910 | 00:17:56,550 ~-~-> 00:18:00,660 | ||
| 911 | goals for daily or weekly because you don't Know what the | ||
| 912 | |||
| 913 | 229 | ||
| 914 | 00:18:00,660 ~-~-> 00:18:03,750 | ||
| 915 | markets going to do? Well, I would submit that that's | ||
| 916 | |||
| 917 | 230 | ||
| 918 | 00:18:03,840 ~-~-> 00:18:08,010 | ||
| 919 | partially true. We don't know with any assurity what the | ||
| 920 | |||
| 921 | 231 | ||
| 922 | 00:18:08,010 ~-~-> 00:18:11,700 | ||
| 923 | markets going to do. But we do have pretty strong | ||
| 924 | |||
| 925 | 232 | ||
| 926 | 00:18:11,700 ~-~-> 00:18:15,120 | ||
| 927 | probabilities of wherever the market may reach for. And if | ||
| 928 | |||
| 929 | 233 | ||
| 930 | 00:18:15,120 ~-~-> 00:18:18,360 | ||
| 931 | we can frame the idea of where we're trying to get in at | ||
| 932 | |||
| 933 | 234 | ||
| 934 | 00:18:18,360 ~-~-> 00:18:22,170 | ||
| 935 | based on time and price kill zone and optimal trade entry | ||
| 936 | |||
| 937 | 235 | ||
| 938 | 00:18:22,260 ~-~-> 00:18:25,680 | ||
| 939 | price, and where we're reaching for it, doesn't that not | ||
| 940 | |||
| 941 | 236 | ||
| 942 | 00:18:25,890 ~-~-> 00:18:29,610 | ||
| 943 | offer us a definitive way of determining what could be | ||
| 944 | |||
| 945 | 237 | ||
| 946 | 00:18:29,610 ~-~-> 00:18:33,360 | ||
| 947 | reasonably expected for that particular setup? And if we | ||
| 948 | |||
| 949 | 238 | ||
| 950 | 00:18:33,360 ~-~-> 00:18:36,360 | ||
| 951 | know that we're looking at intraday setups like this is | ||
| 952 | |||
| 953 | 239 | ||
| 954 | 00:18:36,360 ~-~-> 00:18:39,540 | ||
| 955 | typically five days per week, unless it's a holiday or the | ||
| 956 | |||
| 957 | 240 | ||
| 958 | 00:18:39,540 ~-~-> 00:18:42,840 | ||
| 959 | markets are not trading because of some other bank holiday | ||
| 960 | |||
| 961 | 241 | ||
| 962 | 00:18:42,840 ~-~-> 00:18:47,100 | ||
| 963 | whatever we don't want to trade it. We can see many | ||
| 964 | |||
| 965 | 242 | ||
| 966 | 00:18:47,100 ~-~-> 00:18:55,200 | ||
| 967 | instances where 25 to 50 pips is rather easy to get now. | ||
| 968 | |||
| 969 | 243 | ||
| 970 | 00:18:55,800 ~-~-> 00:18:59,340 | ||
| 971 | It's when we get into the I want to make 250 to 500 pips per | ||
| 972 | |||
| 973 | 244 | ||
| 974 | 00:18:59,340 ~-~-> 00:19:03,270 | ||
| 975 | week. Then it becomes a little daunting in terms of a task. | ||
| 976 | |||
| 977 | 245 | ||
| 978 | 00:19:03,510 ~-~-> 00:19:08,940 | ||
| 979 | So I think by focusing on 2025 pips per setup and an aiming | ||
| 980 | |||
| 981 | 246 | ||
| 982 | 00:19:08,940 ~-~-> 00:19:10,590 | ||
| 983 | for two good ones per week, | ||
| 984 | |||
| 985 | 247 | ||
| 986 | 00:19:11,850 ~-~-> 00:19:16,620 | ||
| 987 | I think 50 pips is a really low hanging fruit reachable, | ||
| 988 | |||
| 989 | 248 | ||
| 990 | 00:19:16,680 ~-~-> 00:19:20,970 | ||
| 991 | achievable and certainly realistic in the scope of a | ||
| 992 | |||
| 993 | 249 | ||
| 994 | 00:19:20,970 ~-~-> 00:19:24,810 | ||
| 995 | developing trader. Will you get it every week? No. Will you | ||
| 996 | |||
| 997 | 250 | ||
| 998 | 00:19:24,810 ~-~-> 00:19:28,140 | ||
| 999 | get it right out the gate starting using my concepts? No. | ||
| 1000 | |||
| 1001 | 251 | ||
| 1002 | 00:19:28,800 ~-~-> 00:19:32,490 | ||
| 1003 | But over time, you will eventually grow into that expectancy | ||
| 1004 | |||
| 1005 | 252 | ||
| 1006 | 00:19:32,490 ~-~-> 00:19:37,140 | ||
| 1007 | for a nice return of 50 pips per week. You can frame your | ||
| 1008 | |||
| 1009 | 253 | ||
| 1010 | 00:19:37,140 ~-~-> 00:19:38,400 | ||
| 1011 | entire career on that. |