Wiki source code of ICT YT - 2025-09-25 - Focus On Index Futures - Intermediate Term High Continued September 24 2025
Hide last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.1 | 1 | (% class="hover min" %) |
2 | |1 |00:00:00 ~-~-> 00:00:08 |ICT: Folks, welcome back. This is the focus on index futures, and we'll be | ||
3 | |2 |00:00:08 ~-~-> 00:00:17 |only looking at the Christmas and QE mini futures. September 24 2025 left | ||
4 | |3 |00:00:17 ~-~-> 00:00:22 |hand chart is daily. We'll go over that in a moment and in the one minute chart | ||
5 | |4 |00:00:22 ~-~-> 00:00:30 |here on the right, right. So we have this premium wick, consequent | ||
6 | |5 |00:00:30 ~-~-> 00:00:34 |encouragement in the upper quadrant, lower quadrants and the high and low of | ||
7 | |6 |00:00:34 ~-~-> 00:00:40 |it annotated here, and then this premium wick. So make sure you keep track of | ||
8 | |7 |00:00:40 ~-~-> 00:00:43 |what these levels are here on the daily chart and what you're looking at on the | ||
9 | |8 |00:00:43 ~-~-> 00:00:49 |smaller time frame. So we have the pre market session, buy, buy side, liquidity | ||
10 | |9 |00:00:49 ~-~-> 00:00:56 |pool. So here's the opening at 930 Eastern time. So at that moment, there's | ||
11 | |10 |00:00:56 ~-~-> 00:01:02 |a minor buy side, here's a more prominent buy, side liquidity pool. And | ||
12 | |11 |00:01:02 ~-~-> 00:01:06 |it's not likely to go up to this one here, because we've, we've already | ||
13 | |12 |00:01:06 ~-~-> 00:01:11 |created that high in the pre market session, seven o'clock in the morning. | ||
14 | |13 |00:01:11 ~-~-> 00:01:16 |So it's already done enough run up there, and it's been rejected. Keeps | ||
15 | |14 |00:01:16 ~-~-> 00:01:21 |going lower. So this was the buy side liquidity pool. It aimed for hit it and | ||
16 | |15 |00:01:21 ~-~-> 00:01:28 |then attack the sell side inside this premium wick. See it came right back up, | ||
17 | |16 |00:01:28 ~-~-> 00:01:34 |hit the consequent encroachment level at 24,008 74 and a half breaks outside of | ||
18 | |17 |00:01:34 ~-~-> 00:01:42 |the low of that premium wick here. So it's trading right here now. Okay, and | ||
19 | |18 |00:01:42 ~-~-> 00:01:50 |this first presented fair value gap is a city not using 930 so this is the first | ||
20 | |19 |00:01:50 ~-~-> 00:01:54 |one that formed. So this is first presented fair value gap, and the market | ||
21 | |20 |00:01:54 ~-~-> 00:02:05 |trades up into it and rejects and trades down to the lower quadrant. I'm sorry, | ||
22 | |21 |00:02:05 ~-~-> 00:02:12 |the upper quadrant at 24,007 90 and a half of this premium link here, that's | ||
23 | |22 |00:02:12 ~-~-> 00:02:20 |here. So we traded down to here, and we bounced right back up into 24,008 36 | ||
24 | |23 |00:02:20 ~-~-> 00:02:25 |area and created relative equal highs. I'm going to move forward in the chart. | ||
25 | |24 |00:02:27 ~-~-> 00:02:30 |Here's that first participatory backup, and then that bounce off of it in the | ||
26 | |25 |00:02:30 ~-~-> 00:02:37 |relative equal highs. And we consolidated around the high of this. | ||
27 | |26 |00:02:37 ~-~-> 00:02:45 |Candles wick meandering around, and then we broke lower fair value. Got this | ||
28 | |27 |00:02:45 ~-~-> 00:02:49 |bearish here, after leaving this block of price action while bearish, trading | ||
29 | |28 |00:02:49 ~-~-> 00:02:54 |right back up into this. This is model 2022 because we had buy side taken here, | ||
30 | |29 |00:02:55 ~-~-> 00:02:59 |shift in market structure, trade back up into a fair value gap. It's in a | ||
31 | |30 |00:03:00 ~-~-> 00:03:07 |premium, and then breaks lower. Here's a breaker, high, low, higher, high, | ||
32 | |31 |00:03:07 ~-~-> 00:03:11 |bearish. Breaker, trading into it there, and we have an order block that's | ||
33 | |32 |00:03:11 ~-~-> 00:03:16 |bearish, which is changing the state of delivery. Breaks lower, break away gap | ||
34 | |33 |00:03:16 ~-~-> 00:03:21 |as it leads consequent encroachment of this premium will make. So where's it | ||
35 | |34 |00:03:21 ~-~-> 00:03:27 |going to reach for? We have this area here, but this fair value gap is it's | ||
36 | |35 |00:03:27 ~-~-> 00:03:31 |basically creating a sales on liquidity pool, so it's more likely we're going to | ||
37 | |36 |00:03:31 ~-~-> 00:03:35 |trade out into this area here. So having the quadrants on that creating that | ||
38 | |37 |00:03:35 ~-~-> 00:03:41 |price swing. So the low of that candlestick is the high of the fair | ||
39 | |38 |00:03:41 ~-~-> 00:03:46 |value gap, consequent encouragement, upper quadrant, lower quadrant, and the | ||
40 | |39 |00:03:46 ~-~-> 00:03:50 |low of the fair value gap. That's shaded in blue. So it's trading right here at | ||
41 | |40 |00:03:50 ~-~-> 00:04:01 |24,000x 55 right here, getting down into that and then the lower quadrant there. | ||
42 | |41 |00:04:02 ~-~-> 00:04:08 |At 24,006 29 and a half. I apologize, I have very, very poor eyesight. Now I'm | ||
43 | |42 |00:04:08 ~-~-> 00:04:21 |between prescription so but as it breaks lower, we get into the the low at 24,007 | ||
44 | |43 |00:04:22 ~-~-> 00:04:28 |13. And three quarters of this premium wick right there. And then it creates a | ||
45 | |44 |00:04:28 ~-~-> 00:04:32 |measuring gap. Breaks lower, bearish fair value gap comes right back up, hits | ||
46 | |45 |00:04:32 ~-~-> 00:04:37 |it again, then slams into the upper quadrant, the fair value gap there. And | ||
47 | |46 |00:04:37 ~-~-> 00:04:44 |then we go off that consolidating right you can see consolidation led to | ||
48 | |47 |00:04:44 ~-~-> 00:04:49 |another, deeper retracement, up into this bearish for Vega, extend it over, | ||
49 | |48 |00:04:50 ~-~-> 00:04:59 |breaks lower, comes back up into the low of this premium wick. Here it starts | ||
50 | |49 |00:04:59 ~-~-> 00:05:03 |going. Salivating around it, and then trades right back up to the fair share | ||
51 | |50 |00:05:03 ~-~-> 00:05:09 |value gap and goes into the close of the day, just between the fair value gap and | ||
52 | |51 |00:05:10 ~-~-> 00:05:17 |the quadrant of that premium wick right there. So hopefully you can see the | ||
53 | |52 |00:05:17 ~-~-> 00:05:22 |benefits of having the gradient levels over top of premium and discount wicks. | ||
54 | |53 |00:05:24 ~-~-> 00:05:30 |The question about why did I use one wick and not another? And it's because I | ||
55 | |54 |00:05:30 ~-~-> 00:05:37 |start with the first one going to the left, and I have those levels there on | ||
56 | |55 |00:05:37 ~-~-> 00:05:41 |the chart, and then I have this one would be the next one I would have on | ||
57 | |56 |00:05:41 ~-~-> 00:05:47 |there, and I'm looking for the one that the algorithm is respecting. It's it's | ||
58 | |57 |00:05:47 ~-~-> 00:05:51 |not likely that both of these when they're basically subsequent | ||
59 | |58 |00:05:51 ~-~-> 00:05:59 |candlesticks, like one after another that have wicks. If, for instance, if we | ||
60 | |59 |00:05:59 ~-~-> 00:06:04 |plotted both of them, the chances of them agreeing right over top of the same | ||
61 | |60 |00:06:04 ~-~-> 00:06:09 |levels is it's not likely. But even more so, the chances of my PD arrays | ||
62 | |61 |00:06:09 ~-~-> 00:06:15 |overlapping and converging with both of them being plot on the chart is not | ||
63 | |62 |00:06:15 ~-~-> 00:06:19 |likely. So what I was doing was, and this is the part where you're supposed | ||
64 | |63 |00:06:19 ~-~-> 00:06:23 |to do this stuff on your chart. Not just look at my my charts by having both of | ||
65 | |64 |00:06:23 ~-~-> 00:06:27 |these plotted on yours is not being shown here on the chart here. But if you | ||
66 | |65 |00:06:27 ~-~-> 00:06:30 |plot the discount wick on here and discount wick on here, and put the | ||
67 | |66 |00:06:30 ~-~-> 00:06:33 |gradient levels on it and watch how price was respecting them or not | ||
68 | |67 |00:06:33 ~-~-> 00:06:39 |respecting it, you'll see the reason why I chose the one I did. You have to watch | ||
69 | |68 |00:06:39 ~-~-> 00:06:44 |what price is doing, is it respecting one particular inefficiency or one | ||
70 | |69 |00:06:44 ~-~-> 00:06:50 |particular wick and not another? So it's not like here's a hard and fast rule | ||
71 | |70 |00:06:50 ~-~-> 00:06:56 |that always works. You have to put some elbow grease into it and apply some due | ||
72 | |71 |00:06:56 ~-~-> 00:07:01 |diligence by looking for what the price action is actually doing. And it'll, | ||
73 | |72 |00:07:01 ~-~-> 00:07:05 |it'll be obvious which one you're supposed to be using. But all the time, | ||
74 | |73 |00:07:05 ~-~-> 00:07:11 |all the time, like I mentioned on the very first lesson last Tuesday, you have | ||
75 | |74 |00:07:11 ~-~-> 00:07:18 |to consider what wicks are available when you're trading all time highs, and | ||
76 | |75 |00:07:18 ~-~-> 00:07:25 |use all of them. Go back and look at the rules. Okay, it's there, but it doesn't | ||
77 | |76 |00:07:25 ~-~-> 00:07:30 |remove the workload for you to have them plot on your chart and see if there's | ||
78 | |77 |00:07:30 ~-~-> 00:07:37 |any validity to one wick over another one wick will be respected, and it's | ||
79 | |78 |00:07:37 ~-~-> 00:07:41 |your job to determine which one that is while price is delivering than before | ||
80 | |79 |00:07:41 ~-~-> 00:07:42 |the next move happens, | ||
81 | |80 |00:07:51 ~-~-> 00:07:55 |right, folks, short, sweet and right to the point I will touch base with you, | ||
82 | |81 |00:07:55 ~-~-> 00:07:58 |Lord willing tomorrow, until then, I wish good luck and good trading. | ||
83 |