1 | 00:00:07 --> 00:00:12 | ICT: Hi folks, so it's going to be a voice over. So this is after the fact |
2 | 00:00:12 --> 00:00:16 | I'm giving you commentary, but the commentary was given to you live during |
3 | 00:00:16 --> 00:00:24 | the telegram, real time commentary. I usually do the audio clips, but because |
4 | 00:00:24 --> 00:00:30 | I had a tech for my HVAC system here today, we had a bad gas valve. There was |
5 | 00:00:30 --> 00:00:34 | a lot of interruptions between that and my puppy, Piper, she got sick. So there |
6 | 00:00:34 --> 00:00:38 | was a whole lot of that stuff going on, very difficult today. So the market, I |
7 | 00:00:38 --> 00:00:43 | used the inversion Fairbank gap. I mentioned, and I mentioned the bearish |
8 | 00:00:43 --> 00:00:49 | breaker. And I'm actually highlighting the order block that was initially used |
9 | 00:00:49 --> 00:00:54 | the same price higher. I It was a personal note for me. I want to see it |
10 | 00:00:54 --> 00:00:58 | become like an inversion PD array. In other words, whatever was bullish, if |
11 | 00:00:58 --> 00:01:02 | it's if it's bearish, you know, I want to see a trade lower, so I just took one |
12 | 00:01:03 --> 00:01:09 | contract off, and I'm bringing the stop down. And this is high resistance |
13 | 00:01:09 --> 00:01:13 | liquidity run conditions. I mean, it's very, very, very challenging, even for |
14 | 00:01:13 --> 00:01:17 | me. And I know that sounds arrogant and egotistical to some of you, but it's, |
15 | 00:01:17 --> 00:01:22 | it's the facts. I mean, it was challenging, and markets staying in a |
16 | 00:01:22 --> 00:01:27 | very tight range and coming back and stopping me out. So I want to go in and |
17 | 00:01:27 --> 00:01:34 | try it again. And I reacted off that bearish breaker, and we want to see it |
18 | 00:01:34 --> 00:01:39 | trade down into that blue shaded area where I have now lowered that by limit |
19 | 00:01:39 --> 00:01:45 | order. I mentioned in the telegram channel that it would be likely that the |
20 | 00:01:45 --> 00:01:53 | lunch macro would send it down to 21,008 35 to 21,008 25 respectively. And I |
21 | 00:01:53 --> 00:01:57 | always have a best case scenario. I had the limit order to cover way, way, way |
22 | 00:01:57 --> 00:02:02 | below that, because if I happen to catch a tiger by the tail. It's always fun to |
23 | 00:02:03 --> 00:02:08 | get something extra, more than you originally wanted. So I wanted to see it |
24 | 00:02:08 --> 00:02:12 | break lower here, after working the low of that inversion fair value gap that's |
25 | 00:02:12 --> 00:02:17 | shaded in orange. And now, because it's the type of day it is, I moved my stop |
26 | 00:02:17 --> 00:02:22 | to cover costs. And admittedly, in hindsight, I'm going to regret not |
27 | 00:02:22 --> 00:02:27 | taking a partial as it went below that low, because I'm talking to the HVAC |
28 | 00:02:27 --> 00:02:30 | tech at this time, and I'm getting frustrated with him because he's |
29 | 00:02:30 --> 00:02:35 | assuming that I know his job. If I did, I wouldn't hire him. I would do it |
30 | 00:02:35 --> 00:02:45 | myself, right? So at any rate, I'm looking for a breakdown further, and I'm |
31 | 00:02:45 --> 00:02:50 | extending that order block with the expectation that it would likely pull |
32 | 00:02:50 --> 00:02:55 | down lower and just overall, it's just a very, very, very difficult day. It's not |
33 | 00:02:56 --> 00:03:02 | it's not helping matters that we have all of the Fed Chair testimonies that's |
34 | 00:03:02 --> 00:03:11 | going to happen this week, and we have high impact news also hitting. So that's |
35 | 00:03:11 --> 00:03:15 | a lot of things that's making it much more challenging, plus, we're in that |
36 | 00:03:15 --> 00:03:22 | big daily range that I mentioned in the shotgun Saturday, so I'm pairing the |
37 | 00:03:22 --> 00:03:28 | risk of open profit and bringing in more potential profit should happen. I |
38 | 00:03:28 --> 00:03:32 | mentioned at the time that if it goes to consequent crochet inversion fair value |
39 | 00:03:32 --> 00:03:35 | gap, that that would be the breaks. For me. It's reason why you're seeing it |
40 | 00:03:35 --> 00:03:42 | now, because I have the stop loss there. And another time here where I was really |
41 | 00:03:43 --> 00:03:47 | better equipped. If I would have taken a part on there because of the profile day |
42 | 00:03:48 --> 00:03:53 | being high resistance, I should have taken a contract off that when it went |
43 | 00:03:53 --> 00:03:59 | below the short term low. But I'm sitting here watching it, and I want to |
44 | 00:03:59 --> 00:04:07 | see it. Say, failed to go up into half of the order blocks that I have |
45 | 00:04:07 --> 00:04:15 | highlighted here as an inversion block. Okay? And I want to see it not do that, |
46 | 00:04:15 --> 00:04:20 | but it stopped me out. And that's the breaks for today. So very, very |
47 | 00:04:20 --> 00:04:26 | challenging, even for that three letter guy, I say, but was able to get some |
48 | 00:04:26 --> 00:04:34 | some pizza money. So we can take a look at this. Now you can see trying to get |
49 | 00:04:34 --> 00:04:40 | in here and put on some more towards here, trying once more to get down into |
50 | 00:04:40 --> 00:04:50 | that 21,008 35 to 21,008 25 basically selling the low of that inversion, fair |
51 | 00:04:50 --> 00:04:56 | value gap. HVAC tech guy just just left. I looked at the chart. I was like, Well, |
52 | 00:04:56 --> 00:05:02 | let me see if I can skin this cat still. I. The risk is at the top of the |
53 | 00:05:02 --> 00:05:09 | inversion fair value gap, and there is a partial and again, we're going to see if |
54 | 00:05:09 --> 00:05:13 | I can get down into that lower portion of that buy sign and balance cell sign |
55 | 00:05:13 --> 00:05:18 | efficiency. And again, now the stop also has been brought down to cover costs. So |
56 | 00:05:19 --> 00:05:23 | again, just very, very, very challenging today, very challenging, lots of |
57 | 00:05:23 --> 00:05:30 | manipulation, lots of just, you know, opposition. Really, I'm checking es |
58 | 00:05:30 --> 00:05:34 | here, and there's my second partial. And now I'm just going to see what I can get |
59 | 00:05:34 --> 00:05:37 | out of this, you know, see if there's any extra juice in this lemon, if you |
60 | 00:05:37 --> 00:05:41 | will. I'm completely content with getting stopped out because I'm honestly |
61 | 00:05:42 --> 00:05:46 | little ticked off because I had too many things I watched that small, little fair |
62 | 00:05:46 --> 00:05:54 | value gap, and I want to see it break hard from here, but it's being very |
63 | 00:05:54 --> 00:06:00 | reluctant to do so. So I'm going to extend this out here and share my |
64 | 00:06:00 --> 00:06:04 | perspective. I want to see it act as an inversion fair value gap here. So I want |
65 | 00:06:04 --> 00:06:08 | to see it break down, go below it to the downside, and then if it has to come |
66 | 00:06:08 --> 00:06:11 | back up in again, I don't want to see it explore in the upper half. |
67 | 00:06:20 --> 00:06:25 | And again, just an overzealous target, because I'm trying not to worry about it |
68 | 00:06:25 --> 00:06:29 | getting to a specific target. I'm worried about watching what price is |
69 | 00:06:29 --> 00:06:35 | showing me each candlestick. So if it's looming close to my target, I'm going to |
70 | 00:06:35 --> 00:06:39 | be worried about that. So to remove that, I just move the target completely |
71 | 00:06:39 --> 00:06:43 | out of the way I'm managing more specifically about, does it still want |
72 | 00:06:43 --> 00:06:49 | to respect that inversion for value gap, or what I'm viewing as a potential |
73 | 00:06:49 --> 00:06:56 | inversion for value gap, and say it that way, and I already don't like what it's |
74 | 00:06:56 --> 00:07:03 | doing here. It's being very stubborn, okay, and the fact that it's spending so |
75 | 00:07:03 --> 00:07:08 | much time in an inversion fair pay gap is problematic, but because I've already |
76 | 00:07:08 --> 00:07:12 | taken two partials, I'm just going to let it ride and see what happens. And if |
77 | 00:07:12 --> 00:07:16 | I get stopped out, I get stopped out, if it breaks lower, then I will consider |
78 | 00:07:16 --> 00:07:22 | moving the stop loss lower. That's what I'm thinking at that time. I |
79 | 00:07:30 --> 00:07:34 | i already know this is problematic, but I'm going to commit to the trade and let |
80 | 00:07:34 --> 00:07:43 | you see, even in days like this, I would, I would want to, generally hold |
81 | 00:07:43 --> 00:07:48 | and put the stop loss just a little bit above, but I'm going to take one off |
82 | 00:07:48 --> 00:07:52 | just to prove that this is how you might want to do this, and that way, if you |
83 | 00:07:52 --> 00:07:56 | are likely to get stopped out, at least it's not taking the full open profit |
84 | 00:07:56 --> 00:08:02 | before getting stopped out. So I was able to bank another contract there in |
85 | 00:08:02 --> 00:08:05 | the event that it should pop up and get the stop loss. It's not taking two |
86 | 00:08:05 --> 00:08:10 | contracts. It's just taking one, okay, and lower the stop down aggressively to |
87 | 00:08:10 --> 00:08:13 | that little short term high. Because if it's going to go there, folks, then I |
88 | 00:08:13 --> 00:08:20 | don't want to be in it any longer. So I'm facetiously posted in the telegram |
89 | 00:08:20 --> 00:08:24 | challenge. I could actually feel my hair is turning gray today, and it's only |
90 | 00:08:24 --> 00:08:27 | because, not because of the price action, but because of all the |
91 | 00:08:27 --> 00:08:29 | distractions here at home. |
92 | 00:08:34 --> 00:08:40 | So I was, I was very, very much outnumbered with all of the adversities. |
93 | 00:08:40 --> 00:08:42 | So I kind of felt like a retail trader for the first day, |
94 | 00:08:48 --> 00:08:52 | and there I am getting stopped out. So I'll show you the executions right |
95 | 00:08:52 --> 00:08:58 | there. And just in case somebody wants to ask about that chart over there, it's |
96 | 00:08:58 --> 00:09:02 | the same stuff over there. I hope you found insightful till next time be safe. |
97 | 00:09:02 --> 00:09:02 | You. |