1 | 00:01:40 --> 00:01:47 | ICT: Well, good morning, folks. If you could give me a audio check on Twitter |
2 | 00:01:47 --> 00:01:50 | for those that are following me, if you guys can hear me, you |
3 | 00:02:20 --> 00:02:44 | I take a Walk, to grab my phone to see if you guys could reply to me on |
4 | 00:02:44 --> 00:02:47 | Twitter. But I see you all can hear me fine. Thank you so much. But by the way, |
5 | 00:02:47 --> 00:02:52 | hope you had a good weekend, good morning. I actually had eight hours of |
6 | 00:02:52 --> 00:02:59 | sleep last night. It's not a normal thing for ICT. I usually do about four |
7 | 00:02:59 --> 00:03:09 | hours or so in two sessions per day, in some naps, but I have some things to |
8 | 00:03:09 --> 00:03:13 | take care of today that prevent me from streaming during the normal opening bell |
9 | 00:03:13 --> 00:03:19 | till 10 3011, o'clock or so. So I'll be doing a pre market tape reading session |
10 | 00:03:19 --> 00:03:29 | with you, and I'll teach you a couple things. Just want to get the most recent |
11 | 00:03:29 --> 00:03:35 | view here since 830 has now transpired. If you look on the right hand side the |
12 | 00:03:35 --> 00:03:41 | white background chart, or it should be white background the the left hand side |
13 | 00:03:41 --> 00:03:50 | is a five minute chart over here, and this is a 32nd chart. So some of you may |
14 | 00:03:50 --> 00:03:53 | not have the ability to look at a 32nd chart. Some of you may not have an |
15 | 00:03:53 --> 00:03:58 | interest in looking at a 32nd chart at all. But for those that are trying to |
16 | 00:03:58 --> 00:04:04 | learn how to reprice and get familiar with the price delivery continuum that |
17 | 00:04:04 --> 00:04:10 | is afforded to us as a technical trader, viewing price with the expectation that |
18 | 00:04:10 --> 00:04:14 | it's going to continuously deliver from one PD array to the next, from one time |
19 | 00:04:14 --> 00:04:20 | frame to the next, not necessarily a top down in and out itself. It's not just a |
20 | 00:04:20 --> 00:04:24 | generic term for top down. It's very specific things that we're looking for |
21 | 00:04:24 --> 00:04:30 | that would constitute a setup that would yield the probabilities of moving from a |
22 | 00:04:30 --> 00:04:34 | discount to a premium array or a premium array to a discount array. In other |
23 | 00:04:35 --> 00:04:39 | words, something that gets short on and then an obvious level to take profits |
24 | 00:04:39 --> 00:04:44 | lower, or an obvious level to get long on to an obvious level to take profit |
25 | 00:04:44 --> 00:04:54 | and sell. So I have stripped this thing down here to opening range gaps and |
26 | 00:04:56 --> 00:05:01 | Asian session liquidity pools now right away. You should already notice that |
27 | 00:05:03 --> 00:05:09 | Friday selling price is up here. Okay, so that's going to be higher than where |
28 | 00:05:09 --> 00:05:13 | we are at market price. If you notice in the lower right hand corner, it's eth is |
29 | 00:05:13 --> 00:05:19 | electronic trading hours. You can see that by toggling here. So over here is |
30 | 00:05:19 --> 00:05:24 | electronic trading hours and here as well electronic trading hours because we |
31 | 00:05:24 --> 00:05:28 | have settled here. And I'll go into regular trading hours, and I'll explain |
32 | 00:05:28 --> 00:05:38 | why I have the chart annotated like that. Here's a settlement price here at |
33 | 00:05:39 --> 00:05:43 | 414, now I'm looking at it on the perspective of five minute chart. So |
34 | 00:05:43 --> 00:05:48 | it's going to look a little wonky, because I'm showing you 410 candle. 410 |
35 | 00:05:48 --> 00:05:52 | is not the settlement time, but it would be on a five minute chart. So to |
36 | 00:05:53 --> 00:05:56 | eliminate all the confusion, that's why I tell you to drop down to a one minute |
37 | 00:05:56 --> 00:06:00 | chart and get the opening price in this in the closing price when you're doing |
38 | 00:06:00 --> 00:06:06 | your gaps, whether it be new week opening gap or New Day opening gap. So |
39 | 00:06:06 --> 00:06:12 | because it's Friday's settlement price on river trading hours, and since I can |
40 | 00:06:12 --> 00:06:17 | do this here, I'll just show it to one minute chart, that way you guys can see |
41 | 00:06:17 --> 00:06:24 | it. This is how you pick your opening range gap, previous day settlement. You |
42 | 00:06:25 --> 00:06:30 | go to record trading hours, one minute chart. Last candlestick here is at 414 |
43 | 00:06:30 --> 00:06:37 | because there is no trading at 415 it settles at 414 so there's no data for |
44 | 00:06:37 --> 00:06:43 | 415 because the market's closed for regular trading hours, but it trades |
45 | 00:06:43 --> 00:06:47 | until five o'clock. Then it has the one hour, uh, break if it's another trading |
46 | 00:06:47 --> 00:06:51 | day, but on Friday, it's the settlement. And then there's like, uh, electronic |
47 | 00:06:51 --> 00:06:56 | trading hours that will continue until 5pm Eastern Time, near local time. Then |
48 | 00:06:56 --> 00:07:01 | it stops for the weekend. Well, we're annotating that here on Fridays 4:14pm, |
49 | 00:07:02 --> 00:07:08 | Eastern, Standard Time. That is our previous settlement. In this case, it's |
50 | 00:07:08 --> 00:07:12 | previous week settlement price on river trading hours. But because I already see |
51 | 00:07:12 --> 00:07:18 | that we're such a discount relative to that, and I'll scrub down to see it up |
52 | 00:07:18 --> 00:07:23 | here. See there's Monday's opening range gap high. The reason why I'm annotating |
53 | 00:07:23 --> 00:07:27 | that is the likelihood is that we're probably not going to trade all the way |
54 | 00:07:27 --> 00:07:33 | back up there by 930 now, can it happen? Absolutely, it can. But for the sake of |
55 | 00:07:33 --> 00:07:39 | annotation and getting a feel for before I started the live stream this morning, |
56 | 00:07:39 --> 00:07:45 | I wanted to determine where we would be for a gap closure. So naturally, |
57 | 00:07:45 --> 00:07:49 | anything opening lower than this price here on the right, on the left hand |
58 | 00:07:49 --> 00:07:53 | side, which is regular trading hour settlement price at 4:14pm, Eastern, |
59 | 00:07:53 --> 00:07:58 | Standard Time. It's a mouthful, I know, but it's just simply regular trading |
60 | 00:07:58 --> 00:08:03 | hours closed on Friday. Okay, so we have not yet seen any regular trading hour |
61 | 00:08:03 --> 00:08:09 | trading for the new week yet. It's all electronic trading. So when it started |
62 | 00:08:09 --> 00:08:12 | trading at six o'clock yesterday evening, you |
63 | 00:08:30 --> 00:08:32 | here's Friday's |
64 | 00:08:37 --> 00:08:41 | settlement price on Electronic trading hours here. So you Would annotate that. |
65 | 00:08:51 --> 00:08:52 | Let's go with this. |
66 | 00:09:06 --> 00:09:09 | Okay, you make the opening gap low. Why do I know that's the low? It's because |
67 | 00:09:09 --> 00:09:15 | we settled here and we started trading here on Sunday at 6pm Eastern time. So |
68 | 00:09:15 --> 00:09:19 | you just take this once it highlights. Hold down. Control. Drag it away. You |
69 | 00:09:19 --> 00:09:23 | can copy that and then simply drag it there, put it right on the opening price |
70 | 00:09:25 --> 00:09:37 | and change the high, I'm sorry, change the low to high there. And it's rather |
71 | 00:09:37 --> 00:09:42 | small, because it's 44 and a quarter to 496, and a quarter. So it's really, |
72 | 00:09:42 --> 00:09:45 | really small. You can, you can put the consequent encroaching on that. |
73 | 00:09:45 --> 00:09:48 | Generally, I just eyeball it. But for the sake of just showing you how to do |
74 | 00:09:48 --> 00:09:55 | it again as a recap, there is an absence of any significant price data coming out |
75 | 00:09:55 --> 00:10:03 | at 830 and on. Today and or Tuesday. It's nothing really terribly exciting. |
76 | 00:10:06 --> 00:10:14 | And then what I do is I just take a line segment, drop it on and then make sure |
77 | 00:10:14 --> 00:10:20 | it says 490, and a quarter, which it does, and then not change it the line |
78 | 00:10:20 --> 00:10:24 | color too. So that's contrasting, |
79 | 00:10:36 --> 00:10:42 | maybe opening gap, consequent encroachment, everything being equal and |
80 | 00:10:42 --> 00:10:49 | there all right. And now you can go back into looking at where we are in |
81 | 00:10:49 --> 00:10:54 | relationship to all those things. You can see the new week opening gap is up |
82 | 00:10:54 --> 00:11:01 | here. It's also encapsulating the Friday regular trading hours, settlement price, |
83 | 00:11:03 --> 00:11:09 | which would be the Monday gap reference points. So it's always previous days, |
84 | 00:11:09 --> 00:11:16 | settlement at regular trading hours. But don't call it or label it as yesterday's |
85 | 00:11:16 --> 00:11:20 | or last Friday's date. You're using this data for today's trading which is |
86 | 00:11:20 --> 00:11:25 | Monday. So it's going to be Monday's opening range gap high, because we're |
87 | 00:11:25 --> 00:11:30 | sitting here right now, now, in the rare event that it trades all the way back up |
88 | 00:11:30 --> 00:11:35 | to here and traverses over 100 handles before reaching 930 opening bell, then |
89 | 00:11:35 --> 00:11:40 | you would just simply have to change the the label to whatever it would require, |
90 | 00:11:40 --> 00:11:44 | if it went back up to it and higher, then this would become the opening range |
91 | 00:11:44 --> 00:11:49 | gap low, and then whatever 9/31 print would be that would be the opening range |
92 | 00:11:49 --> 00:11:57 | gap high. All right, so let's go back into a five minute chart on that one and |
93 | 00:11:57 --> 00:12:06 | leave everything as it is. Widen them up a little bit. Okay. And over here 32nd |
94 | 00:12:06 --> 00:12:15 | chart, you can already see there's a lot of liquidity sitting under this block of |
95 | 00:12:15 --> 00:12:22 | price action. It's just a little just looks kind of wonky. I like the idea of |
96 | 00:12:22 --> 00:12:27 | coming back down to Thursday's opening range, gap low. And if it was to do |
97 | 00:12:27 --> 00:12:31 | that, excuse me, if it were to do that and trade down below it, we have |
98 | 00:12:31 --> 00:12:37 | Thursday's Asian session, sell side liquidity. Now I'm gonna magnify this |
99 | 00:12:37 --> 00:12:43 | chart here and kind of show you what that reference is. We have some minor |
100 | 00:12:43 --> 00:12:45 | cell side, which you guarding attack that the bodies have stayed above that |
101 | 00:12:45 --> 00:12:51 | we wick down through it so it's allowed to do the damage. There we have this |
102 | 00:12:51 --> 00:12:55 | level. Here I'm watching without having having an annotation, should we start to |
103 | 00:12:55 --> 00:13:01 | slide again? Lower that consequent encroachment. And then we have the Asian |
104 | 00:13:01 --> 00:13:06 | session low, you can see that 8:30pm It's New York local time, always on |
105 | 00:13:06 --> 00:13:11 | october 17, last Thursday. So the liquidity we're seeing below that time |
106 | 00:13:11 --> 00:13:16 | of day, okay, which is a session high or session low? In this case, when you |
107 | 00:13:16 --> 00:13:21 | don't have any data, okay, nothing coming out at 830 and the day is pretty |
108 | 00:13:21 --> 00:13:28 | much void of any kind of volatility injections, no real impact drivers by |
109 | 00:13:29 --> 00:13:33 | medium impact or high impact on the economic calendar, you want to aim for |
110 | 00:13:33 --> 00:13:37 | session highs and session lows. That means, what was the high and the low of |
111 | 00:13:37 --> 00:13:43 | London? What was the high and low of Asia. What was the pm session high and |
112 | 00:13:43 --> 00:13:48 | low of the previous trading session, or trading day rather? And then what was |
113 | 00:13:48 --> 00:13:54 | the am session high and low of that previous day's trading? All of those are |
114 | 00:13:54 --> 00:13:58 | relative to where you're at on the market. Pre market like now we're |
115 | 00:13:58 --> 00:14:05 | trading electronic trading hours. We're trading at 20,003 90 even by going into |
116 | 00:14:05 --> 00:14:08 | your chart and annotating where the highs and lows are respectively. In |
117 | 00:14:08 --> 00:14:15 | other words, what was London's high and low or the overnight dealing range I |
118 | 00:14:15 --> 00:14:20 | taught you that last week. And if we are in a market protraction, where it's just |
119 | 00:14:20 --> 00:14:27 | really running in one direction. You don't grade that. But if there is a |
120 | 00:14:27 --> 00:14:32 | consolidation, if you grade it, you can anticipate exactly where throughout the |
121 | 00:14:32 --> 00:14:38 | morning session, during pre market, where the next subsequent premium or |
122 | 00:14:38 --> 00:14:41 | discount array will form. And you can trade the pre market session. But I even |
123 | 00:14:41 --> 00:14:44 | have to be there for the opening. For the opening bell or do anything rest of |
124 | 00:14:44 --> 00:14:49 | the day. But when we have no data, when the economic calendar is anemic, it's |
125 | 00:14:49 --> 00:14:54 | just simply void of anything that would constitute an injection of volatility by |
126 | 00:14:54 --> 00:15:00 | a medium impact or a high impact news driver, some kind of news data. I. Then |
127 | 00:15:00 --> 00:15:05 | the easiest thing you can do is aim for you don't need to do it just in these |
128 | 00:15:05 --> 00:15:09 | instances. If it becomes something you like, you can simply use previous |
129 | 00:15:09 --> 00:15:13 | session highs and lows. That means not the daily highs and lows that's also |
130 | 00:15:13 --> 00:15:17 | included here, but session highs and lows. Okay, so we strip it down to |
131 | 00:15:17 --> 00:15:23 | London session, New York, session, am, pm session in New York, then you have |
132 | 00:15:23 --> 00:15:28 | Asian session. Okay, so you have four opportunities per day to frame a trade |
133 | 00:15:28 --> 00:15:33 | setup. Now this is not an invitation for you to go hog wild out there and try to |
134 | 00:15:33 --> 00:15:37 | trade every single one of these sessions, but you should, if it allows |
135 | 00:15:37 --> 00:15:40 | you by your schedule, if you're you know, if your personal time afford you |
136 | 00:15:40 --> 00:15:46 | to sit in front of charts and tape read them. It will help you become a better |
137 | 00:15:46 --> 00:15:48 | and well rounded technical trader. You'll be able to read price better |
138 | 00:15:48 --> 00:15:54 | because you have a lot more experience doing it. So my go to protocol is when |
139 | 00:15:54 --> 00:15:57 | there's no data, when there's nothing coming out at 830 it doesn't mean that |
140 | 00:15:57 --> 00:16:00 | the market just sits still because there's no data. Obviously it's going to |
141 | 00:16:01 --> 00:16:06 | move, but what you're gonna aim for is session highs and session lows and as |
142 | 00:16:06 --> 00:16:11 | again, do not think that this is the only thing you do, just because there's |
143 | 00:16:11 --> 00:16:17 | no data that's being released at 830 it can be utilized in days that have |
144 | 00:16:17 --> 00:16:22 | economic data that has medium impact or high impact news events around 830 or |
145 | 00:16:22 --> 00:16:28 | so. But it's my usual reach for Okay, well, I'm just going to simply look for |
146 | 00:16:28 --> 00:16:32 | the liquidity in the previous session. So what was the high and the low in |
147 | 00:16:32 --> 00:16:42 | London? We're already annotating the the Thursdays Asian range. Low, which would |
148 | 00:16:42 --> 00:16:45 | be below that would be sell side. And then I have believed Wednesday as well. |
149 | 00:16:46 --> 00:16:51 | Yeah, I have Wednesdays Asian session, sell side liquidity pool annotated right |
150 | 00:16:51 --> 00:16:56 | here with these relative equal lows. If you look at that low right there, it's |
151 | 00:16:56 --> 00:17:01 | 810, and we don't care about anything over here, because that's the low during |
152 | 00:17:01 --> 00:17:06 | Asia, and it's relative equal low. So if we were to lose ground this morning into |
153 | 00:17:07 --> 00:17:15 | the regular trading session, 930 going into 11 o'clock London, close, if we |
154 | 00:17:15 --> 00:17:20 | were to trade lower than this low here, my focus would be here for the for the |
155 | 00:17:20 --> 00:17:27 | morning session. That means between 930 and 11 o'clock or so going into noon, as |
156 | 00:17:27 --> 00:17:33 | it stands right now, I want to kind of show you London's overnight dealing |
157 | 00:17:33 --> 00:17:38 | range, so that way you can frame it, and you'll know what to do each session. And |
158 | 00:17:41 --> 00:17:45 | you can do this every single day, and you'll never run out of setups. You'll |
159 | 00:17:45 --> 00:17:50 | never, ever, ever, ever run out of setups, even on high resistance |
160 | 00:17:50 --> 00:17:56 | liquidity run days, these reference points will be used on low resistance |
161 | 00:17:56 --> 00:18:01 | liquidity run days. They are absolute bangers for just easy, low hanging fruit |
162 | 00:18:01 --> 00:18:04 | objectives, getting in, taking your profit right there, and being content |
163 | 00:18:04 --> 00:18:09 | with that it may continuously run beyond what you're aiming for, but in the |
164 | 00:18:09 --> 00:18:16 | beginning, doesn't that give you a really good probability of finding |
165 | 00:18:16 --> 00:18:20 | consistent setups that would reward your diligence about looking for Something |
166 | 00:18:20 --> 00:18:24 | that repeats over and over again. You should not be trying to get 100 handles |
167 | 00:18:24 --> 00:18:28 | a day in the beginning as a new trader. That's not realistic. It's not realistic |
168 | 00:18:28 --> 00:18:34 | at all. But if you can get five handles a day on S, P and 10 handles a day on |
169 | 00:18:34 --> 00:18:41 | NASDAQ as your first rung objective, and you grow to 15 handles to 20 handles in |
170 | 00:18:41 --> 00:18:47 | the NASDAQ, to 10 to 15 handles in the ES, once and once you get it for the |
171 | 00:18:47 --> 00:18:50 | day, then stop. Then take regressive day, because you're going to be training |
172 | 00:18:50 --> 00:18:55 | yourself for discipline, and you're also looking for that one good setup that you |
173 | 00:18:55 --> 00:18:58 | trust based on the technicals, based on your bias, based on everything you have |
174 | 00:18:58 --> 00:19:01 | going on. And if you're trying to just press the button every time you feel an |
175 | 00:19:01 --> 00:19:05 | impulse to do so, you're not do so you're not really following a model. So |
176 | 00:19:05 --> 00:19:09 | the only way you fix that is by going in and looking for one good setup that has |
177 | 00:19:09 --> 00:19:13 | a plethora of things that around IT support the idea that is likely to go |
178 | 00:19:13 --> 00:19:17 | there, in that direction, at that PD array, you're trying to trade off of and |
179 | 00:19:17 --> 00:19:24 | being diligent about forming that responsibility, that accountability in |
180 | 00:19:24 --> 00:19:27 | yourself, only looking for that one setup, and the way you get there is |
181 | 00:19:27 --> 00:19:31 | simply knowing where are the likely candidates for the market to draw to. |
182 | 00:19:32 --> 00:19:36 | Now taking buy side liquidity and sell side liquidity out of the equation in |
183 | 00:19:36 --> 00:19:40 | terms of just nearby swing highs and lows, and then framing on which swing |
184 | 00:19:40 --> 00:19:45 | highs and swing swing lows. Which are they? Well, in London, we have to frame, |
185 | 00:19:45 --> 00:19:51 | obviously the London time. So here is midnight, and we're working again with |
186 | 00:19:51 --> 00:19:56 | the five minute chart. So we have midnight New York local time. So that's |
187 | 00:19:56 --> 00:20:05 | true day. And then we have a. The kill zone, which is 2am Eastern Standard |
188 | 00:20:05 --> 00:20:20 | Time, which ends at 5am now where's the liquidity in that time? Well, that's the |
189 | 00:20:20 --> 00:20:26 | low of it here, so I can rebook back to that low. But I'm not interested in it. |
190 | 00:20:26 --> 00:20:33 | I want to know what is the I'll make these levels black, okay, and I'll make |
191 | 00:20:33 --> 00:20:37 | them bold. So this is London session. I'm |
192 | 00:20:46 --> 00:20:55 | one session low bottom left, and we'll make it 16, okay, and then you can |
193 | 00:20:55 --> 00:21:05 | already see what's here. What is that smooth highs? I'm so you highlight the |
194 | 00:21:05 --> 00:21:09 | level you want to copy. Hold down Control, drag it up, and it denies you |
195 | 00:21:09 --> 00:21:14 | because you're watching being done on live stream. It all these messes when |
196 | 00:21:14 --> 00:21:21 | you fucking trading view. So we have relative equal highs. So this will be |
197 | 00:21:21 --> 00:21:28 | london session high, right? And obviously you don't need to label it. |
198 | 00:21:28 --> 00:21:31 | You know what's above it, because you know what's above highs, it's by side. |
199 | 00:21:32 --> 00:21:36 | But what you're doing is you're labeling your chart with these reference points |
200 | 00:21:36 --> 00:21:42 | for the basis of understanding where certain liquidity pools will be a |
201 | 00:21:42 --> 00:21:46 | factor. Now, obviously it goes without saying that. You know, there's a short |
202 | 00:21:46 --> 00:21:50 | term little high here, so we'll be resting above that buy side liquidity. |
203 | 00:21:50 --> 00:21:57 | But in in reference to and and in deference to time, what's more, what's |
204 | 00:21:57 --> 00:22:02 | more salient for the morning session is it the london session highs here, or |
205 | 00:22:02 --> 00:22:06 | this one single little candlestick high where there would be buy side above both |
206 | 00:22:06 --> 00:22:11 | this area here and these, but which one's more likely to be a draw on |
207 | 00:22:11 --> 00:22:14 | liquidity? Why would the market if it were, in fact, manipulated, if it was |
208 | 00:22:14 --> 00:22:17 | controlled, if it was targeting liquidity, if it was doing those very |
209 | 00:22:17 --> 00:22:20 | things, and I'm saying that in tongue in cheek, because it obviously is doing |
210 | 00:22:20 --> 00:22:23 | that. But there's a lot of people in the world that don't believe that. Don't |
211 | 00:22:24 --> 00:22:28 | believe that. Would would it be simply in interest only go back up to this high |
212 | 00:22:28 --> 00:22:32 | here and not even disrupt these smooth highs? Or would it be, yes, this would |
213 | 00:22:32 --> 00:22:35 | be one minor objective to reach for, but we would like to see it. Want to |
214 | 00:22:35 --> 00:22:39 | accelerate through that area to get to this area here, before they could take |
215 | 00:22:39 --> 00:22:42 | their stops out of the marketplace. We want to, we want to see the market |
216 | 00:22:42 --> 00:22:48 | gravitate back here aggressively. That further is the likelihood in pre market. |
217 | 00:22:48 --> 00:22:57 | Because why we have a gap now it's, it's slowly eroding the the the size of the |
218 | 00:22:57 --> 00:23:01 | gap that would be, if it was opening down here, that would be a rather large |
219 | 00:23:01 --> 00:23:08 | gap, but it's narrowing that gap now as we get closer and closer to 930 which |
220 | 00:23:09 --> 00:23:13 | will be where I'm at here on the five minute chart. So we have time. Is it |
221 | 00:23:13 --> 00:23:18 | likely to draw all the up arrow to 2000 I'm sorry, 20,004 94, and a quarter |
222 | 00:23:19 --> 00:23:24 | probabilities are rather small for it to occur, but it can, obviously it can do |
223 | 00:23:24 --> 00:23:31 | things like that. So in pre market, when there's no data, I like to look at where |
224 | 00:23:31 --> 00:23:36 | we were for London. So if we were looking at trading in London, these are |
225 | 00:23:36 --> 00:23:42 | the reference points that that session created its range, the highest high |
226 | 00:23:44 --> 00:23:49 | inside of London, between two o'clock in the morning here and 5am when the london |
227 | 00:23:49 --> 00:23:54 | session closes, or in turns of the kill zone, the time that the algorithm will |
228 | 00:23:54 --> 00:23:59 | be looking for liquidity, looking for PD arrays, looking for a reason to Move all |
229 | 00:23:59 --> 00:24:06 | that is encapsulated inside that time. Now this is the same thing for forex. So |
230 | 00:24:06 --> 00:24:09 | if you're a forex trader, it's the same application. There's nothing different |
231 | 00:24:09 --> 00:24:13 | here. It is absolutely no different. Everything I've said so far this morning |
232 | 00:24:13 --> 00:24:19 | is still relative to Forex. It's relative to bonds, it's relative to |
233 | 00:24:22 --> 00:24:27 | current. Currency futures, not just Forex. Like everything is being |
234 | 00:24:27 --> 00:24:31 | explained to you on the basis of time, and it's it's universal, so it goes |
235 | 00:24:31 --> 00:24:37 | across all the asset classes except for crypto. I have not investigated crypto. |
236 | 00:24:37 --> 00:24:40 | I have students that swear by I don't have an interest in ever trading it. So |
237 | 00:24:40 --> 00:24:45 | that's why I say I don't say it there. But you're welcome to investigate that |
238 | 00:24:45 --> 00:24:49 | yourself. I don't do it. I don't trade the Indian markets. I have no experience |
239 | 00:24:49 --> 00:24:52 | with the Nifty 50. I don't have any experience with that at all. I don't |
240 | 00:24:52 --> 00:24:58 | know if it works at all there. So for the folks that live in India that use |
241 | 00:24:58 --> 00:25:02 | that as your your base. For trading, it's in your hands determine whether |
242 | 00:25:02 --> 00:25:06 | there's a value in using these concepts there. I don't have any experience with |
243 | 00:25:06 --> 00:25:09 | it, so I get a lot of questions in the comment section asking that. I just |
244 | 00:25:09 --> 00:25:16 | simply don't have an answer for you in that regard. So again, back to where |
245 | 00:25:16 --> 00:25:25 | we're at. What is the usual protocol for a discount gap opening at 930 meaning if |
246 | 00:25:25 --> 00:25:29 | we open lower than previous day, selling what's what's previous day on Monday, |
247 | 00:25:30 --> 00:25:35 | it's last Friday, always. So unless Friday was a holiday and there was no |
248 | 00:25:35 --> 00:25:41 | trading, we would simply use previous day or previous week, if it's a Monday. |
249 | 00:25:41 --> 00:25:47 | So in this case, since it's actually Monday, October 21 2420 24 we refer back |
250 | 00:25:47 --> 00:25:53 | to Friday's electronic I'm sorry. Friday's regular trading hours close or |
251 | 00:25:53 --> 00:25:59 | settlement price. Any one second I forgot to put my phone on. Do not |
252 | 00:25:59 --> 00:26:03 | disturb. There's always some Yahoo trying to talk to anyone. I'm doing this |
253 | 00:26:04 --> 00:26:13 | anyway, the so when we have a gap lower at 930 relative to the previous day's |
254 | 00:26:13 --> 00:26:18 | settlement price, and that being Friday's settlement price, and that's |
255 | 00:26:18 --> 00:26:23 | this black line here. Okay, it's labeled Monday's opening range gap high because |
256 | 00:26:23 --> 00:26:27 | we're down here already, so it's not likely that we're gonna come all the way |
257 | 00:26:27 --> 00:26:32 | back up here by 930 so I've already annotated my chart here. Technically, |
258 | 00:26:33 --> 00:26:39 | this should be labeled as Friday's electronic trading settlement closing |
259 | 00:26:39 --> 00:26:45 | price, but because I feel like we'll probably open somewhere below that. That |
260 | 00:26:45 --> 00:26:48 | means whatever the opening price, let's say, let's play devil's advocate for a |
261 | 00:26:48 --> 00:26:56 | moment. And let's say the next tick is the opening price, and it's 408 Okay, so |
262 | 00:26:56 --> 00:27:03 | four eight even. So I would annotate my chart at 408 even. 20,004 0800, and and |
263 | 00:27:03 --> 00:27:06 | that would be lower than that level up here. So that would be labeled as |
264 | 00:27:06 --> 00:27:12 | Monday's opening range, gap low. Now, because it's opened lower. What is the |
265 | 00:27:12 --> 00:27:17 | bias? What's the bias for the next 30 minutes, or the first 30 minutes at 930, |
266 | 00:27:17 --> 00:27:24 | 10 o'clock? It would be bullish, expecting a minimum of half of that gaps |
267 | 00:27:24 --> 00:27:28 | range to be traded to, because there's a 70% likelihood of half the gap being |
268 | 00:27:28 --> 00:27:33 | traded to during the first 30 minutes of trading, 930 to 10 o'clock Eastern time. |
269 | 00:27:33 --> 00:27:39 | So if it were to do that, okay? And again, this, this is hypothetical, |
270 | 00:27:39 --> 00:27:43 | because I'm not going to be here for 930 okay, but I'm just giving you how I look |
271 | 00:27:43 --> 00:27:48 | at the pre market session and then how I use that also in relationship to session |
272 | 00:27:48 --> 00:27:51 | highs and session lows, as we have here we have London sessions highs. That's my |
273 | 00:27:51 --> 00:27:55 | interest. I'm not interested in just simply going back to the London lows |
274 | 00:27:55 --> 00:28:00 | that we've already worked those here. So if we can get back through the London |
275 | 00:28:00 --> 00:28:04 | low what levels would be impactful? Well, we obviously have short term minor |
276 | 00:28:04 --> 00:28:08 | buy side liquidity there, so you can annotate that with a very thin level |
277 | 00:28:09 --> 00:28:12 | that doesn't draw too much attention, but still annotates it for the purposes |
278 | 00:28:12 --> 00:28:23 | of your tape reading. We can do something like this, and then minor buy |
279 | 00:28:23 --> 00:28:39 | side, liquidity, top left, and we'll do it Okay, and that's all too okay. So |
280 | 00:28:39 --> 00:28:43 | it's ghosted there. You can still see it, but it's not jumping off the chart |
281 | 00:28:43 --> 00:28:47 | saying, Hey, look at me. So your your eye isn't looking at that and thinking, |
282 | 00:28:47 --> 00:28:53 | well, this is all there is to this move. These levels are bold, because I want my |
283 | 00:28:53 --> 00:28:58 | students looking at this chart to see that as a much more impactful level to |
284 | 00:28:58 --> 00:29:01 | draw to not to simply let me come up here and knock out the stops on anyone |
285 | 00:29:01 --> 00:29:05 | that's short here. This is where the majority of the liquidity is. If |
286 | 00:29:05 --> 00:29:10 | anyone's short up here, this is where their stops trail to now admit, |
287 | 00:29:10 --> 00:29:13 | admittedly, there's some that has trailed it here, and probably all down |
288 | 00:29:13 --> 00:29:16 | to here, and they've been stopped out. So they're no longer a factor in the |
289 | 00:29:16 --> 00:29:21 | equation anyway. But using that 408 level hypothetically, say that was |
290 | 00:29:21 --> 00:29:30 | 20,004 zero, 8.00 say that was at 930 and that gap would be solidified as a |
291 | 00:29:30 --> 00:29:34 | discount gap, meaning that we opened lower than previous render trading hours |
292 | 00:29:34 --> 00:29:37 | selling price, which is this level up here I've annotated already for Monday's |
293 | 00:29:37 --> 00:29:44 | Opening range. Gap high. That means for the next 30 minutes from 930 to 10 |
294 | 00:29:44 --> 00:29:50 | o'clock, my bias would be bullish. It at the very minimum until, until 50% of |
295 | 00:29:50 --> 00:29:54 | that opening range gap is traded to So hypothetically, okay, and this is not to |
296 | 00:29:54 --> 00:29:58 | be used for today, okay, I'm just saying. I'm teaching you how to do this |
297 | 00:29:58 --> 00:30:05 | stuff every single day, going for. Board. Okay, so hypothetically, let's |
298 | 00:30:05 --> 00:30:11 | say that is the other side of the range, or what would be, quote, unquote, the |
299 | 00:30:11 --> 00:30:18 | 930 opening price. That means that this would be your first tick price at 930 |
300 | 00:30:18 --> 00:30:21 | and then you reference where you've previously settled on Friday because |
301 | 00:30:21 --> 00:30:28 | it's Monday. So you would drop your fib on that level here, and up to |
302 | 00:30:31 --> 00:30:36 | 494 and a quarter, and you drop it so there's 50% of the opening range. If it |
303 | 00:30:36 --> 00:30:41 | was using four zero, it ain't using 408 because it's not even 930 yet. So be |
304 | 00:30:41 --> 00:30:44 | aware that what I'm suggesting to you here is just a hypothetical approach to |
305 | 00:30:44 --> 00:30:50 | how I do it anyway. So notice that we would have half the gap here, and if it |
306 | 00:30:50 --> 00:30:54 | was sitting here like this, would I be content with simply trying to be long up |
307 | 00:30:54 --> 00:30:58 | into that level there, knowing that there is London session highs right here |
308 | 00:30:58 --> 00:31:03 | that are smooth. So what would what would be the most likely scenario for |
309 | 00:31:03 --> 00:31:07 | ICT to be trading in that situation? I would be long looking for a partial |
310 | 00:31:07 --> 00:31:12 | here, but more specifically, aiming for a draw in above here, because if it's |
311 | 00:31:12 --> 00:31:15 | going to go here, and it's in close proximity, there's relative equal highs, |
312 | 00:31:15 --> 00:31:19 | it's not likely to leave that there, because we have a whole lot more or half |
313 | 00:31:19 --> 00:31:22 | the other portion of that gap still to be traded to it could go a full gap |
314 | 00:31:22 --> 00:31:28 | closure or three quarter gap closure. So by blending session highs and session |
315 | 00:31:28 --> 00:31:33 | lows in also incorporating the opening range, gap when, when the gap is |
316 | 00:31:33 --> 00:31:40 | allowing that that that measure of importance, in this case, hypothetically |
317 | 00:31:40 --> 00:31:45 | using that 408 point 00, level, if it were the opening price, it could be |
318 | 00:31:45 --> 00:31:51 | simply any price. I mean, I'm saying, if it say we open up here, okay, and that |
319 | 00:31:51 --> 00:31:58 | would mean that we have mid gap would be essentially about there, which also |
320 | 00:31:58 --> 00:32:03 | agrees with clearing out the london session. Highs by side. So it's building |
321 | 00:32:03 --> 00:32:10 | what several things, not just one thing, several things to lean on in terms of a |
322 | 00:32:10 --> 00:32:15 | draw, on liquidity, and you're using finite reference points, not something |
323 | 00:32:15 --> 00:32:18 | that's always morphing into something new, always trying to figure out a |
324 | 00:32:18 --> 00:32:22 | mystery in price action. The highest high and the lowest low of london |
325 | 00:32:22 --> 00:32:26 | session is what it is. That's what it is. Okay, it's not going to change it. |
326 | 00:32:26 --> 00:32:30 | Can't hide it from you. Okay. And the opening range gap, if there is one, and |
327 | 00:32:31 --> 00:32:34 | generally there is one, that just depends how much of a gap there, there |
328 | 00:32:34 --> 00:32:40 | would be if we're opening lower, you know, until half that gap is filled |
329 | 00:32:40 --> 00:32:45 | during the first 30 minutes, I am looking for longs. I'm not looking to go |
330 | 00:32:45 --> 00:32:49 | short. I'm never, ever, ever, ever, ever going in there on the basis of simply |
331 | 00:32:49 --> 00:32:52 | just going, I'm going to go short because we open lower. That's the worst |
332 | 00:32:52 --> 00:32:56 | thing in the world to do. That's what retail minded traders do. They want to |
333 | 00:32:56 --> 00:33:00 | chase. They think, wow, we're we're way down from yesterday. Because they look |
334 | 00:33:00 --> 00:33:05 | at the relationship between yesterday's close to where we open today. That's the |
335 | 00:33:05 --> 00:33:09 | public's perspective. The professional perspective is, where do we close from |
336 | 00:33:09 --> 00:33:14 | today's opening? That's the challenge I put out for the people that make |
337 | 00:33:14 --> 00:33:18 | indicators. If you plot a cumulative line on the relationship between |
338 | 00:33:18 --> 00:33:22 | yesterday's close and today's open, and you plot that on a cumulative basis, |
339 | 00:33:22 --> 00:33:26 | you're going to see what retail perspective is. And if you plot it on |
340 | 00:33:26 --> 00:33:30 | the basis of today's opening price versus today's closing price, you're |
341 | 00:33:30 --> 00:33:34 | going to get the professional mindset, because that's actual accumulation and |
342 | 00:33:34 --> 00:33:38 | distribution once the market has booked, when there's an opening price, opening |
343 | 00:33:38 --> 00:33:43 | price is always, always rough cut sentiment. That means it's meant to go |
344 | 00:33:43 --> 00:33:48 | out there and inspire or discourage traders that are less informed, because |
345 | 00:33:48 --> 00:33:53 | they're mostly impulsive creatures. So they see, oh, we opened lower than |
346 | 00:33:53 --> 00:33:56 | yesterday's close or last week's close. So therefore they think it's weak, so |
347 | 00:33:56 --> 00:33:59 | therefore they want to chase it, and they go short. And then what happens is, |
348 | 00:33:59 --> 00:34:03 | is the gap starts to close in, even if it's just a half a gap that's enough to |
349 | 00:34:03 --> 00:34:07 | wipe them out many times, because you retail traders want to over leverage |
350 | 00:34:07 --> 00:34:12 | just a quarter of the gap being traded too and being filled just a quarter |
351 | 00:34:13 --> 00:34:17 | portion of it wouldn't stop you out and cause you to have a losing trade or |
352 | 00:34:17 --> 00:34:24 | losing day. So it's real important to measure several factors relative to |
353 | 00:34:24 --> 00:34:29 | time. That's what we're focusing on here time. And then what price levels in |
354 | 00:34:29 --> 00:34:38 | those periods are we concerned with? If we're looking at days that have high |
355 | 00:34:38 --> 00:34:42 | impact or medium impact news drivers, then obviously what I'm showing here |
356 | 00:34:42 --> 00:34:51 | still is applicable. It's even more likely to deliver faster runs. What's |
357 | 00:34:51 --> 00:34:54 | missing is the volatility injection. Because of the news not being available |
358 | 00:34:54 --> 00:34:58 | to us, we don't have a medium impact we don't have a high impact news driver. We |
359 | 00:34:58 --> 00:35:04 | don't have like a PMI, a C. Pi, we don't have any kind of we have really nothing |
360 | 00:35:04 --> 00:35:08 | that speak up Monday and Tuesday of this calendar week. So I I'm not suggesting |
361 | 00:35:08 --> 00:35:12 | that simply because there's no data, that there's no reason to trade. There |
362 | 00:35:12 --> 00:35:16 | is absolutely reasons to trade, but you have to have a procedure or a protocol |
363 | 00:35:16 --> 00:35:20 | that you're going to stick to to help you frame your setups. Otherwise you're |
364 | 00:35:20 --> 00:35:23 | guessing. Otherwise, you're trying to do something on the basis of just one |
365 | 00:35:23 --> 00:35:27 | candlestick pattern, one order block, one fair value gap, you know, just |
366 | 00:35:27 --> 00:35:31 | because it looks like it's, you know, this high here or this low here, you |
367 | 00:35:31 --> 00:35:35 | know which ones are going to hit. Is it going to take the minor buy side here? |
368 | 00:35:35 --> 00:35:38 | Is it going to take the minor sell side here? Because that's what should be |
369 | 00:35:38 --> 00:35:42 | framed, basically, right now, where we're trading. Right now your focus |
370 | 00:35:42 --> 00:35:46 | should be, are we going to take the buy side here? Are we going to take the sell |
371 | 00:35:46 --> 00:35:53 | side there? That's the next move. Nothing, nothing else except for staying |
372 | 00:35:53 --> 00:35:57 | inside that range between this high and that low. There's nothing else you can |
373 | 00:35:58 --> 00:36:02 | do. There's nothing there's nothing else to do. Either it stays in the range or |
374 | 00:36:02 --> 00:36:07 | it runs for the buy side or runs for the sell side. So your question that needs |
375 | 00:36:07 --> 00:36:12 | to be answered is, do you know with any degree of confidence which one of those |
376 | 00:36:12 --> 00:36:18 | levels are going to be traded to now, as we get closer, if it stays in that range |
377 | 00:36:18 --> 00:36:22 | between this high and that low, as we get closer to 930 opening bell, which I |
378 | 00:36:22 --> 00:36:27 | won't be here with you. Okay, literally, I'm going to be going here in about six |
379 | 00:36:27 --> 00:36:34 | or seven minutes. You want to see it draw higher, because you why? Why would |
380 | 00:36:34 --> 00:36:40 | that be a factor? Because the gap aspect, because you're already lower |
381 | 00:36:40 --> 00:36:45 | than previous day selling Friday. So again at 930 that starts that countdown |
382 | 00:36:45 --> 00:36:49 | for the next 30 minutes. Between 930 to 10 o'clock Eastern time, your bias is |
383 | 00:36:49 --> 00:36:55 | what bullish until 50% that gap is closed. It doesn't mean it then becomes |
384 | 00:36:55 --> 00:37:00 | bearish. It just means that that 70% of the time, that's what's usually |
385 | 00:37:00 --> 00:37:05 | unfolding. That's what's usually likely to be seen in price action. Now, does it |
386 | 00:37:05 --> 00:37:10 | mean that if it doesn't go up there and go to 50% opening range gap within the |
387 | 00:37:10 --> 00:37:14 | 30 minutes of 930, to 10 o'clock, then it ain't going to go there? No, I'm |
388 | 00:37:14 --> 00:37:22 | still going to look for that. I'm just saying for a immediate bias, something |
389 | 00:37:22 --> 00:37:26 | to look for in price action, a some something to study, something to tape, |
390 | 00:37:26 --> 00:37:30 | read, something to draw your focus to. Instead of just looking at the charts |
391 | 00:37:30 --> 00:37:34 | and not knowing what you're looking at or what you're looking for, it gives you |
392 | 00:37:34 --> 00:37:40 | immediate information, Intel. If we got lower, okay, look for it to go higher up |
393 | 00:37:40 --> 00:37:44 | to half the gap, and that could be your entire model. And you never need to do |
394 | 00:37:44 --> 00:37:46 | anything else. You never need to come back and watch any of my videos. You |
395 | 00:37:46 --> 00:37:50 | never need to worry about any of my live streams anymore, ever, ever, ever, ever, |
396 | 00:37:50 --> 00:37:55 | that's my goal as a mentor. I am not trying to tether you to me. Every other |
397 | 00:37:55 --> 00:37:58 | mentor wants you to constantly watch them. They want you to buy their |
398 | 00:37:58 --> 00:38:01 | bullshit. They want you to buy their courses. They want you to do everything |
399 | 00:38:01 --> 00:38:04 | it keeps feeding them and paying their bills. I'm looking to end your |
400 | 00:38:04 --> 00:38:08 | visibility. No, not visible, your viewership. That's my goal. I want you |
401 | 00:38:08 --> 00:38:12 | to say, You know what I learned? Enough. Thank you. ICT, I never watch your stuff |
402 | 00:38:12 --> 00:38:15 | anymore. That's That's my goal. That's nobody else's goal. In this business, |
403 | 00:38:16 --> 00:38:19 | they're wanting you to continuously come back. I'm trying to bring you to a point |
404 | 00:38:19 --> 00:38:23 | of you're independently thinking without me or anyone else. You're not buying any |
405 | 00:38:23 --> 00:38:26 | courses. You're not buying any other mentorships. You're simply just doing |
406 | 00:38:26 --> 00:38:29 | your own thing, making your money and living your life and taking care of your |
407 | 00:38:29 --> 00:38:34 | family. That's my goal for you. That's it. And if I wanted to make money off of |
408 | 00:38:34 --> 00:38:38 | you, I very easily could do that. I'm not. I'm sitting here giving it to you |
409 | 00:38:38 --> 00:38:43 | for free. You watch or you don't watch it. So obviously this is hypothetical |
410 | 00:38:43 --> 00:38:44 | example, but |
411 | 00:38:49 --> 00:38:56 | so my interest rate now as we go into 930 Okay, or shortly after 930 because |
412 | 00:38:56 --> 00:38:59 | we have the strong likelihood it's going to be a discount gap, that means we're |
413 | 00:38:59 --> 00:39:05 | opening lower than Friday's regulator trading session hours, my interest is |
414 | 00:39:05 --> 00:39:09 | the one in session highs, okay, that that's what I'd like to see. And you're |
415 | 00:39:09 --> 00:39:12 | gonna see whatever you see at 930 at the opening bell. I won't even be able to |
416 | 00:39:12 --> 00:39:16 | see the chart, so I can't do anything. I'm gonna be away from the house and |
417 | 00:39:16 --> 00:39:22 | leave from the ability to see this stuff. So I'm saying to you that, I |
418 | 00:39:22 --> 00:39:26 | think, based on what we have right now, if we start to sell off initially, and |
419 | 00:39:26 --> 00:39:29 | say we take out this low, then I would look for it to change directions and |
420 | 00:39:29 --> 00:39:34 | come back and target the london session high. And that would be what I'm aiming |
421 | 00:39:34 --> 00:39:38 | for for the morning session. If I were there at 930 and it started to sell off |
422 | 00:39:38 --> 00:39:44 | first, if we open initially at 930 and we're below these relative equal highs, |
423 | 00:39:44 --> 00:39:50 | and we're below the london session low. Then I would look for a modest, little, |
424 | 00:39:50 --> 00:39:55 | tiny, little Judah swing lower, taking out whatever one minute, short term load |
425 | 00:39:55 --> 00:40:00 | it may form between where we're at right now and 930 I would. For something like |
426 | 00:40:00 --> 00:40:04 | that. It doesn't need to do that, but I prefer to see that and then rally back |
427 | 00:40:04 --> 00:40:10 | up and then attack here. And that would be building on the basis of drawing into |
428 | 00:40:10 --> 00:40:18 | that discount gap opening, which half that gap would be 70% likelihood, in my |
429 | 00:40:18 --> 00:40:21 | mind, I wouldn't see that half of that gap filled, half of the gap is whatever |
430 | 00:40:21 --> 00:40:26 | that 930 opening price is, we don't know it yet. It's right now, 907, so we have |
431 | 00:40:26 --> 00:40:32 | 23 minutes or so before that happens up to previous regular trading session, |
432 | 00:40:32 --> 00:40:38 | hour close on Friday. So that means that that's why I'm leaving at Monday's |
433 | 00:40:38 --> 00:40:43 | opening range. Gap high. So long story short, that was a long way. And walk |
434 | 00:40:43 --> 00:40:47 | around the barn. I'm looking for these levels to be cleared out this morning. |
435 | 00:40:47 --> 00:40:50 | And that would be my, that would be my trade for, for Caleb, I would tell him, |
436 | 00:40:51 --> 00:40:55 | focus on that. Use any fair value gap. Use the first presented fair value gap. |
437 | 00:40:56 --> 00:41:01 | Try to frame a basis on that being your, your your model for the morning, and if |
438 | 00:41:01 --> 00:41:05 | it wins, you be done with it. If you lose, you don't do it again. You sit |
439 | 00:41:05 --> 00:41:10 | still. Is that hard? Is it ambiguous? Is that wishy washy? No, that's very, very |
440 | 00:41:10 --> 00:41:15 | specific things so, but I've showed you how to build the context around the idea |
441 | 00:41:15 --> 00:41:19 | and just simply looking for a short term high here for buy side, that's not |
442 | 00:41:19 --> 00:41:24 | enough. Where are the previous session? Highs and lows. And that's here, okay? |
443 | 00:41:24 --> 00:41:28 | And we framed it like that. I'll let you take a screenshot. That's it, so you can |
444 | 00:41:28 --> 00:41:32 | have it for your notes. Caleb, hold on one second. There you go. All right, and |
445 | 00:41:32 --> 00:41:36 | that's going to be it for this morning. I apologize my personal schedule, like I |
446 | 00:41:36 --> 00:41:40 | have a lot of things I get done, weather changing and the elections coming up, so |
447 | 00:41:40 --> 00:41:43 | I just want to make sure I have all this stuff done, and then I'll be content to |
448 | 00:41:44 --> 00:41:48 | hang out with you guys more next week. You know, as we finish our 2024 |
449 | 00:41:48 --> 00:41:52 | mentorship, have a good day. Be safe, and so I'll talk to you tomorrow. Lord |
450 | 00:41:52 --> 00:41:52 | willing. You. |