Wiki source code of OTE Pattern Recognition Series - Vol 18.srt
Hide last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.1 | 1 | 1 |
2 | 00:00:09,929 ~-~-> 00:00:12,119 | ||
3 | ICT: Okay folks, welcome back. This is volume 18 and | ||
4 | |||
5 | 2 | ||
6 | 00:00:12,119 ~-~-> 00:00:15,449 | ||
7 | continuing series of 20 videos for the initial traders, | ||
8 | |||
9 | 3 | ||
10 | 00:00:15,659 ~-~-> 00:00:19,559 | ||
11 | optimal trade entry pattern recognition series. Alright, so | ||
12 | |||
13 | 4 | ||
14 | 00:00:19,559 ~-~-> 00:00:22,739 | ||
15 | our example today is from the treasury bond futures contract | ||
16 | |||
17 | 5 | ||
18 | 00:00:22,799 ~-~-> 00:00:27,119 | ||
19 | and the delivery contract month is September 2020. This at | ||
20 | |||
21 | 6 | ||
22 | 00:00:27,119 ~-~-> 00:00:30,449 | ||
23 | the time of this recording June 2 2020. The open interest is | ||
24 | |||
25 | 7 | ||
26 | 00:00:30,449 ~-~-> 00:00:34,169 | ||
27 | the highest in September contract, even though the nearby | ||
28 | |||
29 | 8 | ||
30 | 00:00:34,169 ~-~-> 00:00:40,049 | ||
31 | contract is June. So we're electing to follow this month for | ||
32 | |||
33 | 9 | ||
34 | 00:00:40,049 ~-~-> 00:00:43,199 | ||
35 | treasury bonds. And once you take a look at the daily chart, | ||
36 | |||
37 | 10 | ||
38 | 00:00:43,199 ~-~-> 00:00:46,409 | ||
39 | notice that we have this high to this low and we had a | ||
40 | |||
41 | 11 | ||
42 | 00:00:46,409 ~-~-> 00:00:49,589 | ||
43 | retracement in here and on the first of June we had a nice | ||
44 | |||
45 | 12 | ||
46 | 00:00:49,589 ~-~-> 00:00:53,009 | ||
47 | reaction in here. So is it more likely to take out this | ||
48 | |||
49 | 13 | ||
50 | 00:00:53,009 ~-~-> 00:00:57,509 | ||
51 | candles high or this candles low? Notice that we have a | ||
52 | |||
53 | 14 | ||
54 | 00:00:57,509 ~-~-> 00:01:00,929 | ||
55 | turning point here, a lower turning point here. And now we | ||
56 | |||
57 | 15 | ||
58 | 00:01:00,929 ~-~-> 00:01:07,859 | ||
59 | had a reaction within optimal trade entry. So is it likely | ||
60 | |||
61 | 16 | ||
62 | 00:01:07,859 ~-~-> 00:01:13,289 | ||
63 | to take the low out or the high out? Not the high, the low. | ||
64 | |||
65 | 17 | ||
66 | 00:01:14,189 ~-~-> 00:01:16,559 | ||
67 | And we have relative equal lows here as well. So that could | ||
68 | |||
69 | 18 | ||
70 | 00:01:16,559 ~-~-> 00:01:20,789 | ||
71 | be a potential target. So I'm going to take this off, and | ||
72 | |||
73 | 19 | ||
74 | 00:01:20,789 ~-~-> 00:01:28,319 | ||
75 | we're going to draw out the low here so when we drop down | ||
76 | |||
77 | 20 | ||
78 | 00:01:28,319 ~-~-> 00:01:31,199 | ||
79 | into the lower five minute chart, we'll be able to see the | ||
80 | |||
81 | 21 | ||
82 | 00:01:31,919 ~-~-> 00:01:35,789 | ||
83 | delineation of this particular day's low and it comes in at | ||
84 | |||
85 | 22 | ||
86 | 00:01:36,419 ~-~-> 00:01:40,919 | ||
87 | 177 and 230 seconds. So let's drop down to a five minute | ||
88 | |||
89 | 23 | ||
90 | 00:01:40,919 ~-~-> 00:01:43,889 | ||
91 | chart. Okay, so here is the five minute chart on the | ||
92 | |||
93 | 24 | ||
94 | 00:01:43,949 ~-~-> 00:01:48,089 | ||
95 | September contract for the treasury bond market. And you | ||
96 | |||
97 | 25 | ||
98 | 00:01:48,089 ~-~-> 00:01:51,089 | ||
99 | drill pause your video, study what you think you see here. | ||
100 | |||
101 | 26 | ||
102 | 00:01:57,990 ~-~-> 00:02:00,510 | ||
103 | Okay, so let's take the annotations in add them to the | ||
104 | |||
105 | 27 | ||
106 | 00:02:00,510 ~-~-> 00:02:06,780 | ||
107 | chart, New York session. And we have our high to low and | ||
108 | |||
109 | 28 | ||
110 | 00:02:06,780 ~-~-> 00:02:11,010 | ||
111 | retracement back into optimal trade entry. And this requires | ||
112 | |||
113 | 29 | ||
114 | 00:02:11,040 ~-~-> 00:02:16,920 | ||
115 | a 62% retracement level entry at 177 and 2030 seconds. So | ||
116 | |||
117 | 30 | ||
118 | 00:02:16,920 ~-~-> 00:02:22,530 | ||
119 | the entry is our hypothetical 177 and 2030 seconds, it | ||
120 | |||
121 | 31 | ||
122 | 00:02:22,530 ~-~-> 00:02:25,770 | ||
123 | suffers a draw down now I'm having annotations here not | ||
124 | |||
125 | 32 | ||
126 | 00:02:25,860 ~-~-> 00:02:28,380 | ||
127 | saying that you would be filled here you will be filled here | ||
128 | |||
129 | 33 | ||
130 | 00:02:29,040 ~-~-> 00:02:33,270 | ||
131 | on this candle right there, that particular candle and you | ||
132 | |||
133 | 34 | ||
134 | 00:02:33,270 ~-~-> 00:02:36,660 | ||
135 | have one candle here that goes a little bit against you. But | ||
136 | |||
137 | 35 | ||
138 | 00:02:36,660 ~-~-> 00:02:40,350 | ||
139 | this all these candles here these it's two ticks, which is | ||
140 | |||
141 | 36 | ||
142 | 00:02:40,350 ~-~-> 00:02:44,910 | ||
143 | $31 and 25 cents, each contract, or in this case would be | ||
144 | |||
145 | 37 | ||
146 | 00:02:44,910 ~-~-> 00:02:49,680 | ||
147 | $62 and 50 cents drawl down and using a six tick stop. So | ||
148 | |||
149 | 38 | ||
150 | 00:02:49,680 ~-~-> 00:02:52,800 | ||
151 | it's six times $31 and 25 cents per contract that you're | ||
152 | |||
153 | 39 | ||
154 | 00:02:52,800 ~-~-> 00:02:57,180 | ||
155 | trading. And we have relative equal lows here as well and | ||
156 | |||
157 | 40 | ||
158 | 00:02:57,180 ~-~-> 00:03:04,680 | ||
159 | this heavy line here is the period previous day's low, so | ||
160 | |||
161 | 41 | ||
162 | 00:03:04,680 ~-~-> 00:03:10,470 | ||
163 | June 1 daily low, you can see that we did create an optimal | ||
164 | |||
165 | 42 | ||
166 | 00:03:10,470 ~-~-> 00:03:15,990 | ||
167 | trade entry, looking for it to trade down below that. And | ||
168 | |||
169 | 43 | ||
170 | 00:03:15,990 ~-~-> 00:03:19,350 | ||
171 | ultimately, two standard deviations. That's our day trade | ||
172 | |||
173 | 44 | ||
174 | 00:03:19,380 ~-~-> 00:03:24,960 | ||
175 | for this model is a total of 29 ticks or $906 and 25 cents. | ||
176 | |||
177 | 45 | ||
178 | 00:03:24,960 ~-~-> 00:03:27,630 | ||
179 | Now if you'd like to leader in something to see if it's | ||
180 | |||
181 | 46 | ||
182 | 00:03:27,630 ~-~-> 00:03:31,140 | ||
183 | going to catch a runner, it does in fact go down here and it | ||
184 | |||
185 | 47 | ||
186 | 00:03:31,170 ~-~-> 00:03:34,050 | ||
187 | actually trades to a point at which for one contract, it was | ||
188 | |||
189 | 48 | ||
190 | 00:03:34,050 ~-~-> 00:03:40,530 | ||
191 | over 1600 and $50 per contract. So not bad. Really hard to | ||
192 | |||
193 | 49 | ||
194 | 00:03:40,530 ~-~-> 00:03:43,230 | ||
195 | beat the bond market. It's been tough recently because of | ||
196 | |||
197 | 50 | ||
198 | 00:03:43,230 ~-~-> 00:03:46,710 | ||
199 | all the consolidation and such but when this market does | ||
200 | |||
201 | 51 | ||
202 | 00:03:46,710 ~-~-> 00:03:49,920 | ||
203 | move, there is no better market out there. It beats forex, | ||
204 | |||
205 | 52 | ||
206 | 00:03:49,950 ~-~-> 00:03:53,400 | ||
207 | it beats, index futures, it beats crypto and beats | ||
208 | |||
209 | 53 | ||
210 | 00:03:53,400 ~-~-> 00:03:56,700 | ||
211 | everything. It's so perfect. It allows very ultra short term | ||
212 | |||
213 | 54 | ||
214 | 00:03:57,150 ~-~-> 00:03:59,880 | ||
215 | trades to have very tight stops as you can see here in this | ||
216 | |||
217 | 55 | ||
218 | 00:03:59,880 ~-~-> 00:04:02,910 | ||
219 | case have actually been done with a four tick stop loss and | ||
220 | |||
221 | 56 | ||
222 | 00:04:02,910 ~-~-> 00:04:04,890 | ||
223 | it would have been fine. So hopefully you found this example | ||
224 | |||
225 | 57 | ||
226 | 00:04:04,920 ~-~-> 00:04:07,350 | ||
227 | insightful. Until next time, I wish you good luck and good | ||
228 | |||
229 | 58 | ||
230 | 00:04:07,350 ~-~-> 00:04:07,770 | ||
231 | trading. |