ICT YT - 2024-06-24 - NQ Turtle Soup Short
Outline
00:02 - Trading NASDAQ with potential inversion fair value gap.
- ICT expects NASDAQ to drop, aims to sell short at 8:30 AM ET.
- ICT identifies potential short entry opportunity near 7:50am.
- ICT identifies inversion fair value gap, annotates with gradients.
07:28 - Trading strategies and market analysis.
- ICT explains the concept of quadrants in trading, including the upper and lower quadrants, and how they relate to price action.
- ICT identifies potential trading opportunities based on the algorithm's behavior inside the upper and lower quadrants.
- ICT is focusing on a low at 926 and wants to see the price stay inside that range.
- ICT wants to see the price fall into the low at 926 without returning to its wick.
- ICT warns of scammers pretending to be him on Instagram.
Transcription
1 | 00:00:02,160 --> 00:00:09,660 | Well, good morning, folks. How are you long time? No see. So I've been under |
2 | 00:00:09,660 --> 00:00:16,020 | the weather of sorts. Not sure how to explain it, other than I believe it has |
3 | 00:00:16,020 --> 00:00:23,600 | something to do with blood sugar. I've had some issues with my vision and |
4 | 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:34,820 | dizziness and just oh, I'm not doing well, but I'm working on it. So looking |
5 | 00:00:34,820 --> 00:00:44,620 | at the NASDAQ here, I like the idea of the NASDAQ trading down for a little |
6 | 00:00:44,620 --> 00:00:53,020 | while, that buy side looks safe, that sell side imbalance I'm noting here, I |
7 | 00:00:53,020 --> 00:00:58,180 | want to see it stay below the midpoint, and I'm willing to take a short in here |
8 | 00:00:58,180 --> 00:01:05,700 | and aim for the low form just after eight o'clock in the morning. |
9 | 00:01:09,300 --> 00:01:10,200 | So |
10 | 00:01:14,280 --> 00:01:19,380 | I see several things in here, inversion, pit, value gap that could happen. This |
11 | 00:01:19,380 --> 00:01:22,340 | is the low, |
12 | 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:33,980 | 8:30am Eastern Time. |
13 | 00:01:40,340 --> 00:01:43,720 | This black and this black, |
14 | 00:01:45,880 --> 00:01:50,140 | all right, so that's the initial draw. So I'm expecting it to go there, but I'd |
15 | 00:01:50,140 --> 00:01:55,420 | like to see it go lower. I like 760 as a enemy, eternal swing. So we're going to |
16 | 00:01:55,420 --> 00:02:02,640 | sell short here. I'll put the stop loss right there at the high. I don't think |
17 | 00:02:02,640 --> 00:02:06,240 | that consequent encouragement is going to |
18 | 00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:22,640 | be a factor for this. I'll add some more in here. Okay, and I'll get that off of |
19 | 00:02:22,640 --> 00:02:23,000 | there. |
20 | 00:02:30,620 --> 00:02:36,260 | Now I'm watching that last up close candle, the big, bold, green one. My |
21 | 00:02:36,260 --> 00:02:40,600 | eyes looking right to close that candlestick. And that's a rejection |
22 | 00:02:40,600 --> 00:02:47,080 | block. If it can stab one more time up into that, I'll add just to prove the |
23 | 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:59,380 | method and concept. So we're looking for that decline around 7:50am near ton, I'm |
24 | 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:07,380 | it is a volume imbalance I'm going to add into that right there, |
25 | 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:11,640 | and it might |
26 | 00:03:13,860 --> 00:03:20,780 | not get up into that rejection block, but If it does, I'll add me annotate |
27 | 00:03:20,780 --> 00:03:28,280 | this volume imbalance for you. Now, volume and balance is the weakest in |
28 | 00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:34,940 | terms of the flexibility on all my PD arrays, so I'm completely comfortable |
29 | 00:03:35,540 --> 00:03:40,480 | with letting price go through them and then coming back to them as a i They |
30 | 00:03:44,260 --> 00:03:47,200 | either target means of managing a stop loss. So |
31 | 00:03:51,100 --> 00:03:54,280 | these things always get it where I want it. |
32 | 00:03:55,540 --> 00:03:56,680 | It's never rare I want it. |
33 | 00:04:02,920 --> 00:04:12,600 | I I wanted to thicken up here, come on. There you go. All right, so it could |
34 | 00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:19,080 | bounce off this volume and bounce and if it can sweep to that last up close |
35 | 00:04:19,080 --> 00:04:24,020 | candle, the biggest green one before it turned and rolled over here, I'll take |
36 | 00:04:24,020 --> 00:04:31,820 | that as a an additional short entry, the stop loss is safe. So |
37 | 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:39,860 | just want to draw special attention to that |
38 | 00:04:41,540 --> 00:04:48,820 | so I'm not fearful of adding that's the constant correction of the wick three |
39 | 00:04:48,820 --> 00:04:52,060 | candles back, and there is |
40 | 00:04:53,740 --> 00:04:56,380 | what looks like the rejection block, right |
41 | 00:04:57,699 --> 00:05:01,619 | there. Yep, I got right there. I. So I'd like to see it turn right there on a |
42 | 00:05:01,619 --> 00:05:04,919 | dime. If it's truly, in fact, a rejection block, it should, in fact, |
43 | 00:05:05,219 --> 00:05:09,419 | drop and fall away from here and start gravitating towards that low I was |
44 | 00:05:09,419 --> 00:05:10,139 | looking for. |
45 | 00:05:17,220 --> 00:05:19,140 | Okay, so far so good. I'm |
46 | 00:05:29,540 --> 00:05:33,260 | now this becomes a premium array, where if it trades away from it on the |
47 | 00:05:33,260 --> 00:05:40,900 | downside, if it comes back up into it, it should act as resistance. Because now |
48 | 00:05:40,900 --> 00:05:45,580 | the narratives in play, and there you go. Look at that. It's almost like |
49 | 00:05:45,580 --> 00:05:50,860 | voodoo, all right. So I'm looking at the bottom balance outside of efficiency |
50 | 00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:55,420 | that we're trading inside of, just to the left of where price is trading now. |
51 | 00:05:56,020 --> 00:06:00,120 | And don't lose sight of that low down here, because that's where my focus is. |
52 | 00:06:01,260 --> 00:06:05,340 | I'm not so much concerned about it ripping and, you know, reversing higher, |
53 | 00:06:05,700 --> 00:06:11,820 | but I like the idea of taking some of the risk away here. And I want to see |
54 | 00:06:11,820 --> 00:06:16,080 | that body side and imbalance, cell side and efficiency morph into a |
55 | 00:06:19,139 --> 00:06:24,559 | just be a little facetious here no ICT video was complete without it, and |
56 | 00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:31,100 | that botched and balanced cell sided efficiency, I want to see that act as a |
57 | 00:06:31,100 --> 00:06:37,460 | inversion fair value gap. So inversion fair value gaps are typically shown in |
58 | 00:06:37,460 --> 00:06:43,660 | my educational examples the teachings. I usually annotate them as an orange hued |
59 | 00:06:44,140 --> 00:06:53,080 | rectangle. So while this here, see that candle is high, that candle is low, that |
60 | 00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:59,680 | candle is high, that candle is low. The folks that think these are Lakota diva |
61 | 00:06:59,680 --> 00:07:02,760 | woods, that they could just trade back down into them and go back up because |
62 | 00:07:02,760 --> 00:07:05,820 | they don't know what's going on. They'll look at that as a reason go long and |
63 | 00:07:05,820 --> 00:07:10,440 | they'll lose their shirt here. So what I'm showing you is that I'm viewing that |
64 | 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:13,800 | as an inversion fair value gap. And Chris Laurie doesn't teach that, by the |
65 | 00:07:13,800 --> 00:07:20,840 | way, he might start doing it now, because mine works a lot better, but the |
66 | 00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:28,460 | inversion fair value gap here, I want to annotate that and put gradients inside |
67 | 00:07:28,460 --> 00:07:32,180 | of them. Okay, so what we're going to do is want to break them up into the upper |
68 | 00:07:32,180 --> 00:07:37,820 | quadrant, consequent crochet, which is midpoint, and then there is the lower |
69 | 00:07:37,820 --> 00:07:42,040 | quadrant, and then obviously the low of it. So let me show you that with the FIB |
70 | 00:07:42,700 --> 00:07:45,760 | here. So that's normal, that's consequence encroachment. And here's the |
71 | 00:07:45,760 --> 00:07:49,960 | FIB settings. You want to screenshot that. And now there's the quadrants |
72 | 00:07:49,960 --> 00:07:53,560 | inside of that. This is not quarters theory, and quarters theory is a joke. |
73 | 00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:57,400 | So stop asking me in the comment section. It's all a farce. Okay, it's |
74 | 00:07:57,400 --> 00:08:01,320 | another gimmick. Watch and see what the difference is here. Okay, this is not |
75 | 00:08:01,320 --> 00:08:05,400 | quarters theory. You'll never see anyone teaching this outside of me and my |
76 | 00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:09,780 | lectures and anything. After I've taught it in mentorship. Then you see all these |
77 | 00:08:09,780 --> 00:08:15,480 | little scribes and copycats. Let me copy this little William and balance in here. |
78 | 00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:20,060 | I think we're gonna shoot up into that and hit the upper quadrant at most. I |
79 | 00:08:20,060 --> 00:08:22,160 | don't want to see it close above the up quadrant. |
80 | 00:08:24,560 --> 00:08:26,840 | Picking these up. Oh, there's the up quadrant. |
81 | 00:08:28,879 --> 00:08:35,479 | I said that should be enough. Now, from a narrative standpoint, the algorithm |
82 | 00:08:35,479 --> 00:08:40,659 | should start to spool lower, and there's a little short term low bring below, |
83 | 00:08:42,879 --> 00:08:47,619 | right at 820 or so. That's also inside of another buy side, available time, |
84 | 00:08:47,619 --> 00:08:51,399 | efficiency. I don't expect that to act as a inversion, fair Vega. I'd like to |
85 | 00:08:51,399 --> 00:08:57,339 | see it melt right through that. So what I'm watching here is, does it want to |
86 | 00:08:57,339 --> 00:09:03,599 | trade above the upper quadrant of that inversion? Fair Value. Here's the low I |
87 | 00:09:03,599 --> 00:09:08,699 | was referring to. This is this is a minor sell side liquidity. So it's just |
88 | 00:09:08,699 --> 00:09:14,999 | another factor to look for and study. Is price gravitating to this level. If I |
89 | 00:09:14,999 --> 00:09:19,919 | was extremely insecure as a new developing student, I would look to take |
90 | 00:09:19,919 --> 00:09:24,259 | a partial under this low but I've been around the block a few times, so I'm |
91 | 00:09:25,699 --> 00:09:29,539 | going to hold for the target down here, because I have a longer term target I'm |
92 | 00:09:29,539 --> 00:09:30,379 | trying to reach for. |
93 | 00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:43,540 | Okay, so that's the that's the next gravitational draw on price. And if the |
94 | 00:09:43,540 --> 00:09:47,500 | algorithm does exist, and it does want to go lower, that should just go right |
95 | 00:09:47,500 --> 00:09:52,540 | down there and then accelerate through it, not just poke its tail in the water |
96 | 00:09:52,540 --> 00:09:55,780 | and then go back up into the inversion fair value gap. I don't want to see that |
97 | 00:09:55,780 --> 00:10:03,180 | it's already done the work inside the inversion fair value gap. You. So I want |
98 | 00:10:03,180 --> 00:10:09,600 | to see some big, down, close candles, expansion lower. That'll confirm to me |
99 | 00:10:09,600 --> 00:10:17,400 | that we will absolutely have no problem reaching the 926, level and little bit |
100 | 00:10:17,400 --> 00:10:17,880 | lower. I'll, I'll |
101 | 00:10:19,200 --> 00:10:20,600 | put a limit order below that. |
102 | 00:10:24,320 --> 00:10:27,920 | Right now, I'm focusing on what we're seeing here, and that's beautiful. |
103 | 00:10:27,920 --> 00:10:33,140 | That's exactly what we want to see. Now, spread its wings a little bit more. I |
104 | 00:10:33,140 --> 00:10:33,860 | like that now. |
105 | 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:36,500 | So probably just got lucky, and |
106 | 00:10:39,620 --> 00:10:43,000 | now you got to see the comment section. These guys love these little comments. |
107 | 00:10:48,700 --> 00:10:52,780 | And just for the sake of answering, the folks that constantly leave little |
108 | 00:10:52,780 --> 00:10:58,720 | comments and even messed up here, okay, that colors costs. And the reason why |
109 | 00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:01,780 | you don't see comments, even though it looks like the comment sections open, is |
110 | 00:11:01,780 --> 00:11:05,760 | open. It is open. It's just for me to read anyone that says, Why isn't there |
111 | 00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:08,640 | any comments? I've banned those individuals so I'll never see your |
112 | 00:11:08,640 --> 00:11:12,180 | comments again, and usually they're from people that aren't really subscribed to |
113 | 00:11:12,180 --> 00:11:16,740 | the channel, so I could care less if I ever see your comment again. All right, |
114 | 00:11:16,740 --> 00:11:21,920 | so we have a limit ordered. I want to move just a little bit lower so we have |
115 | 00:11:22,340 --> 00:11:30,020 | 15 scheduled to come off under that low. So far, everything just looks absolutely |
116 | 00:11:30,260 --> 00:11:36,560 | gorgeous. Markets open, no Market Replay. They don't play that game right |
117 | 00:11:36,560 --> 00:11:41,560 | here, I had a person asking, Can you move that thing, what are you hiding? |
118 | 00:11:41,680 --> 00:11:45,520 | There's nothing over here. That's just the time thing. Okay, it's always New |
119 | 00:11:45,520 --> 00:11:49,900 | York, and you can see the countdown to close on the price action for the |
120 | 00:11:50,080 --> 00:11:58,180 | candlestick. So you can't do those things on Market Replay, all right, so |
121 | 00:11:58,180 --> 00:12:01,200 | we're focusing on that low right there. |
122 | 00:12:09,060 --> 00:12:17,280 | Now you see how we're going up into the most recent down closed candle. I want |
123 | 00:12:17,280 --> 00:12:23,540 | to see it stay inside of that range. I don't want to see it go above the open |
124 | 00:12:23,540 --> 00:12:30,920 | of it. So I want to focus primarily on heaviness. I want to see the price have |
125 | 00:12:31,820 --> 00:12:39,440 | no strength overcoming the previous candles body. In other words, I don't |
126 | 00:12:39,440 --> 00:12:43,360 | even want to see it return to its wick. To me, that would indicate that this is |
127 | 00:12:43,360 --> 00:12:49,060 | absolutely going to roll over and smash through that low and it should have no |
128 | 00:12:49,060 --> 00:12:56,500 | problem reaching low enough to get that in the order, small little fair value, |
129 | 00:12:56,500 --> 00:13:01,080 | got it straight up into you see that here. So now with that, I absolutely |
130 | 00:13:01,080 --> 00:13:05,340 | want to see it just fall out of bed and just careen into that low. |
131 | 00:13:06,720 --> 00:13:09,780 | Or for the folks that aren't |
132 | 00:13:11,160 --> 00:13:18,420 | English majors, I want to see it drop down fast, aggressive from where it is |
133 | 00:13:18,420 --> 00:13:24,080 | right now, targeting that low that I have as an initial draw on liquidity |
134 | 00:13:24,740 --> 00:13:30,140 | post, 8:30am Eastern Time as an audio reminder you're seeing. Obviously, on my |
135 | 00:13:30,140 --> 00:13:35,660 | videos, there's a few scammers on Instagram. One has a large following |
136 | 00:13:36,680 --> 00:13:40,960 | pretending to be me. I'm not on Instagram, and I'm not doing a paid |
137 | 00:13:40,960 --> 00:13:45,400 | mentorship. So stop believing these jokers, and if you're giving them money, |
138 | 00:13:45,520 --> 00:13:46,240 | you're an idiot. All |
139 | 00:13:52,540 --> 00:13:55,300 | right, now think about what I was walking you through as we were trading |
140 | 00:13:55,300 --> 00:14:04,500 | up at the highs. Okay, see that that is actually turtle soup, and I will be |
141 | 00:14:04,500 --> 00:14:10,920 | teaching that in an upcoming lecture. It ain't the guy on Twitter teaching you |
142 | 00:14:10,920 --> 00:14:16,260 | the secrets of turtle soup. And it's no, it's not when the rash version, either. |
143 | 00:14:16,260 --> 00:14:22,820 | Everybody out here scrambling make a name for themselves on borrowed hand. Me |
144 | 00:14:22,820 --> 00:14:28,580 | Down logic from good old ICT. So each is usually where we classically flirt with |
145 | 00:14:28,580 --> 00:14:37,220 | it. So I'm gonna add my typical facetious little remark. It says, |
146 | 00:14:37,220 --> 00:14:43,900 | prepare yourself for another random |
147 | 00:14:45,160 --> 00:14:47,260 | act of precision. |
148 | 00:14:52,420 --> 00:14:59,920 | Now we just sit here and wait. It's inevitable, right? |
149 | 00:15:02,100 --> 00:15:03,900 | It's gonna get fucking all the time. |
150 | 00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:21,200 | It should leave this candle or the next for sure, |
151 | 00:15:26,480 --> 00:15:29,900 | looks heavy and |
152 | 00:15:32,720 --> 00:15:40,960 | look at this, look at this guy. Go. All right, so now I'm going to show you what |
153 | 00:15:40,960 --> 00:15:47,560 | I'm really aiming for. I might not get it, but now, because I've done fairly |
154 | 00:15:47,560 --> 00:15:51,280 | well here, it doesn't matter if I, if I'm writing on this, I want to see it |
155 | 00:15:51,280 --> 00:15:58,420 | trade down to 760 and just to make sure I can get a nice exit not to worry about |
156 | 00:15:58,420 --> 00:16:02,280 | babysit it all day or tomorrow, if it needs to be I'll be just a little bit |
157 | 00:16:02,280 --> 00:16:07,140 | above that, 760 Okay, send my letters about that. Everything else stays the |
158 | 00:16:07,140 --> 00:16:12,060 | same. Hope you enjoyed it until talk to you next time. Be safe. Oh, by the way, |
159 | 00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:15,780 | lectures are coming. Just be patient. You. |