| 1 | 00:00:13 --> 00:00:19 | ICT: Man, this OBS, crap, total, uh, |
| 2 | 00:00:26 --> 00:00:30 | the frustration from this thing OBS is what I used to by the way, good morning. |
| 3 | 00:00:31 --> 00:00:42 | The software guy used to try to strain this crap to YouTube is working with me |
| 4 | 00:00:42 --> 00:00:47 | today, so I'm trying to figure out if I can Get the audio cache of |
| 5 | 00:01:39 --> 00:01:51 | Do You check? Are you check? Okay. Now I can hear so anyway, good morning. Sorry |
| 6 | 00:01:51 --> 00:01:54 | for my delay. Here, this technology for you, |
| 7 | 00:01:57 --> 00:01:58 | the |
| 8 | 00:02:00 --> 00:02:06 | NASDAQ here has had its high impact news driver release 830 and then they've |
| 9 | 00:02:06 --> 00:02:19 | pumped it up into the new equipment gap at on july 28 2024 and we have a 15 |
| 10 | 00:02:19 --> 00:02:25 | second chart on the right, and then we have the one minute chart in the lower |
| 11 | 00:02:25 --> 00:02:30 | left, and upper left we have The 15 minute time |
| 12 | 00:02:37 --> 00:02:48 | frame. So I'm a little tricked out of gear because of my opening up like I |
| 13 | 00:02:48 --> 00:02:55 | wanted to give me a few minutes to get my bearings here, maybe turn my |
| 14 | 00:02:55 --> 00:02:57 | grandfather's berries. I |
| 15 | 00:03:12 --> 00:03:23 | peel through this with the one minute chart. This line here is the close in |
| 16 | 00:03:23 --> 00:03:31 | the opening basically being the same price at 5pm yesterday evening New York |
| 17 | 00:03:31 --> 00:03:35 | time and 6pm opening price. |
| 18 | 00:03:41 --> 00:03:44 | So if you recall yesterday, I was mentioning how if it was going to |
| 19 | 00:03:44 --> 00:03:53 | continue, it's going to trade up into new opening gap here on july 28 and if |
| 20 | 00:03:53 --> 00:03:59 | it continued to higher than that, we had some daily short term high and a volume |
| 21 | 00:03:59 --> 00:04:02 | and bounds that was further back in the year. |
| 22 | 00:04:13 --> 00:04:20 | This was pretty aggressive here, opening on our high end technique driver, 830 |
| 23 | 00:04:21 --> 00:04:27 | and sending it up. Finally, bumping that old, new opening. Got on the 28th I'm |
| 24 | 00:05:14 --> 00:05:24 | All right, so we had several highs in here swept into a old music opening gap, |
| 25 | 00:05:24 --> 00:05:31 | and we'll be watching does I'm going to use this information here with that gap |
| 26 | 00:05:31 --> 00:05:37 | and maybe use a wick into this one between This candle is low and this |
| 27 | 00:05:37 --> 00:05:45 | candle is high. I'm I was going to talk to you a few days. I was last week, I |
| 28 | 00:05:45 --> 00:05:52 | was going to talk to you about wicks. I never got to because the stream got |
| 29 | 00:05:52 --> 00:05:57 | interrupted with the remnants of Hurricane Deborah. No Debbie. So |
| 30 | 00:06:00 --> 00:06:05 | whenever there's a wick, I like to see it try to trade back down to the |
| 31 | 00:06:05 --> 00:06:10 | midpoint. If it doesn't get to the midpoint, it's like a fair value gap |
| 32 | 00:06:10 --> 00:06:15 | that can't trade to its consequent encouragement. So it's usually |
| 33 | 00:06:15 --> 00:06:19 | indicative that it wants to go the other direction, because it didn't trade |
| 34 | 00:06:19 --> 00:06:27 | there, and we have done somewhat of a nice, smooth area in here this high. And |
| 35 | 00:06:27 --> 00:06:31 | then they ran up into the new opening gap I'm watching during the opening |
| 36 | 00:06:31 --> 00:06:37 | range, which is the 30 minutes after 930 to 10 o'clock. Did they want to send it |
| 37 | 00:06:37 --> 00:06:43 | up in here or into that? Because if there's two fair value gaps, this is the |
| 38 | 00:06:43 --> 00:06:46 | one you're watching, but you have to make an allowance for it to trade up |
| 39 | 00:06:46 --> 00:06:52 | into there. And if it does want to sell off, I want to see it, try to trade down |
| 40 | 00:06:52 --> 00:06:56 | to here. I'm not trying to call the top, not trying to pick the top, not trying |
| 41 | 00:06:56 --> 00:07:01 | to force an opinion. I'm observing and seeing if it wants to provide that |
| 42 | 00:07:01 --> 00:07:01 | information to me. |
| 43 | 00:07:16 --> 00:07:21 | And the main focus today is turtle soup, by the way, I just want to get a read on |
| 44 | 00:07:21 --> 00:07:24 | what It's doing here going into The 10 O'clock out. |
| 45 | 00:07:42 --> 00:08:31 | So I have to do all that kind of stuff gets on my nerves, too. But all these |
| 46 | 00:08:31 --> 00:08:41 | people out there trying to be me to get engagements for ad revenue or whatever |
| 47 | 00:08:41 --> 00:08:41 | it is they do |
| 48 | 00:08:46 --> 00:08:58 | this to the fellow that says, Make the borders opaque. I want to see the |
| 49 | 00:08:58 --> 00:09:04 | borders. I want to see what the actual candlestick wicks are traded to. So if I |
| 50 | 00:09:04 --> 00:09:12 | don't use the borders, they won't really technically be active. So you're getting |
| 51 | 00:09:12 --> 00:09:17 | a chance to see what it's like when I'm jerked out of gear because I was |
| 52 | 00:09:17 --> 00:09:21 | fighting with this OBS thing for like, 20 minutes. It wasn't, it wasn't syncing |
| 53 | 00:09:21 --> 00:09:25 | with the microphone, it wasn't giving me any audio connection. Though, I had to |
| 54 | 00:09:25 --> 00:09:31 | keep restarting the system, and they had an update, and I chose to use the |
| 55 | 00:09:31 --> 00:09:38 | update. I always tell myself not to do that. It wasn't working. So took several |
| 56 | 00:09:38 --> 00:09:43 | time to do it. Now, pissed off, to be honest, because I come here later than I |
| 57 | 00:09:43 --> 00:09:49 | wanted to be, all right, so we swept down below the close and the opening |
| 58 | 00:09:49 --> 00:09:54 | price at 6pm since there's really no technical gap or difference between the |
| 59 | 00:09:54 --> 00:09:59 | two prices, I always just use a simple little line like that, okay, and I treat |
| 60 | 00:09:59 --> 00:10:04 | it the same way. They can sweep through it, come back and revisit it. It's one |
| 61 | 00:10:04 --> 00:10:09 | single level. It's not a range or inefficiency, it's just one single price |
| 62 | 00:10:09 --> 00:10:09 | level. |
| 63 | 00:10:22 --> 00:10:40 | I so you see, we had this candle here, trade to 131 50. Hi here, 130 1.25 I. |
| 64 | 00:10:40 --> 00:10:56 | Five, 131, even so just fell short of touching that that gap there |
| 65 | 00:11:02 --> 00:11:05 | was talking about, I think it was yesterday, or the previous session. I |
| 66 | 00:11:05 --> 00:11:12 | was referring to yesterday when I was talking about the the lowest barrier to |
| 67 | 00:11:12 --> 00:11:17 | entry, the easiest entry points are going to be the ones that you don't try |
| 68 | 00:11:17 --> 00:11:24 | to finesse too much. And if you're trying to use a month tick above to get |
| 69 | 00:11:24 --> 00:11:28 | any kind of short in that fair value got there, you wouldn't have been filled. |
| 70 | 00:11:28 --> 00:11:34 | And that's the that's the punishment for trying to be too perfect. Try and demand |
| 71 | 00:11:34 --> 00:11:39 | perfection, which is a good problem, because most people can't even figure |
| 72 | 00:11:39 --> 00:11:41 | out what to in terms of direction. They can't figure out how to get into a |
| 73 | 00:11:42 --> 00:11:46 | trade. So if you have a problem with not getting filled on some of your trades, |
| 74 | 00:11:46 --> 00:11:51 | or initially, if you're trying to demand too much perfection, that's actually |
| 75 | 00:11:51 --> 00:12:00 | really good. That's a nice problem to have so much better to tolerate a uh, a |
| 76 | 00:12:04 --> 00:12:09 | repeated phenomenon of you trying to do something that obviously is on the side |
| 77 | 00:12:09 --> 00:12:15 | that means you're correct and where you think the marks on go, versus not |
| 78 | 00:12:15 --> 00:12:18 | knowing what you're doing and always getting it wrong. So it's a little bit |
| 79 | 00:12:18 --> 00:12:22 | more palatable. It's easier to sleep at night knowing that you're on the right |
| 80 | 00:12:22 --> 00:12:27 | side generally. But I got people, you know, sending me emails and reaching out |
| 81 | 00:12:27 --> 00:12:31 | to me through telegram and reaching out to me through trading view and reaching |
| 82 | 00:12:31 --> 00:12:37 | out to me through personal text messages, which is that annoys me. I |
| 83 | 00:12:37 --> 00:12:41 | told everybody I was gonna change my phone number last year when I got to |
| 84 | 00:12:41 --> 00:12:46 | this year, and I haven't done it yet because they haven't made my way to do |
| 85 | 00:12:46 --> 00:12:49 | it. But it's just too many people, they take it upon themselves to feel like |
| 86 | 00:12:49 --> 00:12:53 | they can text me like we're best friends, and I generally don't like |
| 87 | 00:12:53 --> 00:12:57 | that, unless I reached out to you or gave you permission. So we traded down |
| 88 | 00:12:57 --> 00:13:02 | to the consequence of the WIC as we were looking for the only difference, and the |
| 89 | 00:13:02 --> 00:13:06 | only the notable thing is, is we didn't trade up into the gap. We got real close |
| 90 | 00:13:06 --> 00:13:13 | to it, within a ticks distance, within the delivery of price. Okay, so I want |
| 91 | 00:13:13 --> 00:13:21 | you to screenshot that and make special notation in your journal how this is |
| 92 | 00:13:21 --> 00:13:25 | what we were watching. You want to see if you could trade up into it. It did |
| 93 | 00:13:25 --> 00:13:28 | not trade into it. But the idea of trading down to the consequent cursion, |
| 94 | 00:13:28 --> 00:13:36 | or that wick, it was the draw that we saw Christ reach for. And now I want to |
| 95 | 00:13:36 --> 00:13:36 | see, |
| 96 | 00:13:39 --> 00:13:48 | do we keep it? I do we |
| 97 | 00:13:48 --> 00:13:55 | have the ability to stay right there with the bodies, or do we explore to the |
| 98 | 00:13:55 --> 00:13:59 | lower quadrant on that wick? Now, the wicks are going to be part of the |
| 99 | 00:13:59 --> 00:14:03 | conversation today when it comes to turtle suit, as you'll see, |
| 100 | 00:14:10 --> 00:14:17 | right? So here's the opening price on that wick all the way down. So we're |
| 101 | 00:14:17 --> 00:14:22 | looking at the actual news candle. So at 830 there's going to be a lot of |
| 102 | 00:14:23 --> 00:14:30 | inefficiencies in that individual candle, meaning that where we opened, it |
| 103 | 00:14:30 --> 00:14:36 | ran down aggressively, real fast. And we'll look at that on a sub one minute |
| 104 | 00:14:36 --> 00:14:43 | chart in a few minutes. But for now, this inefficiency where prices here, and |
| 105 | 00:14:43 --> 00:14:50 | in a few moments, I watched it deliver this morning. It was wild. It was it |
| 106 | 00:14:50 --> 00:14:54 | wicked, real fast. Went down there and did not spend much time at all, and |
| 107 | 00:14:54 --> 00:14:58 | right back up into where we are here, in the body, and did its business going |
| 108 | 00:14:58 --> 00:15:02 | into the clothes of that individual candle. For one minute, meaning that |
| 109 | 00:15:02 --> 00:15:07 | there is inefficiencies all through this range, from the candles open to the low |
| 110 | 00:15:07 --> 00:15:12 | and again, that'll make much more sense to you when I show you the less than one |
| 111 | 00:15:12 --> 00:15:16 | minute charts. So in other words, the 32nd chart, the 15 second, five and one |
| 112 | 00:15:16 --> 00:15:23 | second chart. But the first rule of engagement, whenever there's a wick, |
| 113 | 00:15:23 --> 00:15:29 | whenever there's a wick, and if it's a swing high or swing low, that has my |
| 114 | 00:15:29 --> 00:15:34 | interest. Obviously, this is where the damage was done. This morning. Anyone |
| 115 | 00:15:34 --> 00:15:41 | that was long going into the 830 news driver, the high impact news, and maybe |
| 116 | 00:15:41 --> 00:15:44 | we're holding on to the targets we were outlining yesterday, the new week, |
| 117 | 00:15:44 --> 00:15:49 | opening gap on the July 28 we mentioned that yesterday as a continuation on the |
| 118 | 00:15:49 --> 00:15:52 | outside, should it reach for further higher prices? This is one of those |
| 119 | 00:15:52 --> 00:15:58 | levels it could reach for. But before it goes there, it trades aggressively, |
| 120 | 00:15:58 --> 00:16:05 | drops down over 100 handles or so, and then eventually pegs that level. This |
| 121 | 00:16:05 --> 00:16:14 | drop down is inefficient, but every single time there's a wick and it's part |
| 122 | 00:16:14 --> 00:16:21 | of a swing high or swing low, that has any importance to me, technically, I'm |
| 123 | 00:16:21 --> 00:16:27 | interested in having the consequent encroachment level annotated, as you can |
| 124 | 00:16:27 --> 00:16:30 | see here. Now, I don't know where you're from. I don't know what school of |
| 125 | 00:16:30 --> 00:16:35 | thought you're you're predominantly a part of I don't know if you're here |
| 126 | 00:16:35 --> 00:16:38 | because you just had a member of curiosity. And you trade another |
| 127 | 00:16:38 --> 00:16:48 | methodology, or if you trade the stuff I teach, but that to me, and turning like |
| 128 | 00:16:48 --> 00:16:55 | that is significant, and it tends to happen all the time. This is a one |
| 129 | 00:16:55 --> 00:17:05 | minute chart, so the question is, is, when you see that, does it invite you to |
| 130 | 00:17:05 --> 00:17:09 | investigate more details around it? Because that's what it started to do |
| 131 | 00:17:09 --> 00:17:13 | with me in the 90s. I was looking at these things happening, and I'm like, |
| 132 | 00:17:14 --> 00:17:21 | Okay, it's probably gonna go down below that low well, sometimes it doesn't do |
| 133 | 00:17:21 --> 00:17:26 | that. So I was going back through charts and looking at different time frames |
| 134 | 00:17:26 --> 00:17:30 | using meta stock with my my software program back then, and I was using end |
| 135 | 00:17:30 --> 00:17:35 | of day data. So I didn't have real time data, but I could, I could go down into |
| 136 | 00:17:35 --> 00:17:40 | intraday charts, those it was part of an end to date package of data. So I would |
| 137 | 00:17:40 --> 00:17:46 | look at hourly charts and 15 minute charts, and it would give me like an x |
| 138 | 00:17:46 --> 00:17:50 | ray view of what took place in the previous day. So I compared, in |
| 139 | 00:17:50 --> 00:17:52 | contrast, that what I was watching when I was driving around the truck |
| 140 | 00:17:52 --> 00:17:58 | delivering candy, soda machine items, coffee machines, cold food machines. |
| 141 | 00:17:58 --> 00:18:01 | That was what I was doing at the time when I was learning how to trade in the |
| 142 | 00:18:01 --> 00:18:06 | 90s. So I fixed and repaired and serviced the vending machines, and I had |
| 143 | 00:18:06 --> 00:18:09 | this little device called, quote, truck. And if you've been around for a long |
| 144 | 00:18:09 --> 00:18:12 | time like me, you know exactly what I'm talking about, but it was kind of a |
| 145 | 00:18:12 --> 00:18:16 | little radio. It's about the size of a transistor radio, not as thick, but it |
| 146 | 00:18:16 --> 00:18:23 | had a little extendable antenna, and it would give you data on any markets that |
| 147 | 00:18:23 --> 00:18:27 | you subscribe to. CBOT says, your border, I'm sorry, Chicago Board trade, |
| 148 | 00:18:28 --> 00:18:35 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange, any of the grain markets that would be on CBOT, I'd |
| 149 | 00:18:35 --> 00:18:40 | be watching them. I'd watch the grain and the meat markets, and I would watch |
| 150 | 00:18:40 --> 00:18:46 | the currency features, and eventually moved away from that, started watching |
| 151 | 00:18:46 --> 00:18:53 | predominantly this, the bonds and then the s, p. So it would give me the |
| 152 | 00:18:53 --> 00:18:58 | details that I would see these flashes in price action that would just be |
| 153 | 00:18:58 --> 00:19:02 | numeric. They wouldn't, I would it doesn't give you a chart, or rather, it |
| 154 | 00:19:02 --> 00:19:04 | did not give you a chart. The technology, really, I guess, wasn't |
| 155 | 00:19:04 --> 00:19:08 | there yet. So they just gave you the raw data, which was the highest high and the |
| 156 | 00:19:08 --> 00:19:11 | lowest low, and where you're at in the volume. And I've said this before, so |
| 157 | 00:19:11 --> 00:19:15 | it's kind of like redundant for something around long enough. That was |
| 158 | 00:19:15 --> 00:19:19 | what I was doing when I was away, where we have a smartphone today. So if I'm |
| 159 | 00:19:19 --> 00:19:22 | out and about, or if you're out and about, you're not in your trade room or |
| 160 | 00:19:22 --> 00:19:27 | office, you can see what the charts are showing and where the price has been and |
| 161 | 00:19:27 --> 00:19:30 | where it's probably going to reach for because you can see it visually. So I |
| 162 | 00:19:30 --> 00:19:37 | was kind of handicapped initially. So when I saw big runs take off, I would |
| 163 | 00:19:37 --> 00:19:42 | write down, usually on a paper towel that I would use to wipe down the inside |
| 164 | 00:19:42 --> 00:19:47 | of my windshield or whatever it was you should have saw this. It was wild. I was |
| 165 | 00:19:47 --> 00:19:50 | not organized in the beginning, because my my job and keeping my job was the |
| 166 | 00:19:50 --> 00:19:54 | most important thing. But I was still trying to manage all this stuff and |
| 167 | 00:19:54 --> 00:19:59 | watch it real time, the closest thing I can be tapped into this and when I would |
| 168 | 00:19:59 --> 00:20:05 | see price runs start. Taking off, and I'd be okay. It's occurring right now at |
| 169 | 00:20:06 --> 00:20:14 | 1049 Okay, or 936 and I'd write the time when I noticed it by the numeric run in |
| 170 | 00:20:14 --> 00:20:18 | price summers, when it started taking off. I didn't have any visual |
| 171 | 00:20:18 --> 00:20:23 | representation of that, except for, I know I saw a price print numerically. I |
| 172 | 00:20:23 --> 00:20:28 | mean, in other words, it would say this price here, 19,000 zero, 48 in the |
| 173 | 00:20:28 --> 00:20:35 | quarter, and it would fluctuate as it's moving here. So if I see these runs, I |
| 174 | 00:20:35 --> 00:20:38 | make a notation, or made a notation. And when I got home in the evening time |
| 175 | 00:20:39 --> 00:20:43 | after working out, getting a shower, eating, and then the rest of them, I I'd |
| 176 | 00:20:43 --> 00:20:47 | be not in the charts, constantly pouring into it and trying to look for these |
| 177 | 00:20:47 --> 00:20:51 | types of things. What made that run like that? And I would see certain things, |
| 178 | 00:20:51 --> 00:20:54 | and sometimes, not all the time. Sometimes there would be these long |
| 179 | 00:20:54 --> 00:20:59 | wicks. Now this is exaggerated because it's a high impact news driver. It goes |
| 180 | 00:21:00 --> 00:21:06 | goes without saying that ppi, CPI, FOMC, non farm, payroll, those types of |
| 181 | 00:21:06 --> 00:21:11 | reports or those types of data points that are released in the marketplace can |
| 182 | 00:21:11 --> 00:21:18 | create that formation of this type of move. When it creates this and it starts |
| 183 | 00:21:18 --> 00:21:24 | to rally up. I've never seen anybody, and I have over 2000 books. I've never |
| 184 | 00:21:24 --> 00:21:28 | seen anybody make reference to anything about going back into the middle of the |
| 185 | 00:21:28 --> 00:21:32 | of this wick, or break it up in the quadrants and use it for the purposes of |
| 186 | 00:21:33 --> 00:21:39 | for reversal patterns, or short term trading, or anticipating it, returning |
| 187 | 00:21:39 --> 00:21:45 | back to it for the sake of a target. Okay, so it was exciting for me to see |
| 188 | 00:21:45 --> 00:21:50 | it, and as you watch this one pan out here, you know, from here to here, that |
| 189 | 00:21:50 --> 00:21:56 | was the observation. So Caleb, when you when you see this, I want you to |
| 190 | 00:21:56 --> 00:22:00 | annotate how it did not trade up into the opportunity for you to get filled, |
| 191 | 00:22:01 --> 00:22:06 | but it's still ran. And then I want to see what your your description of that |
| 192 | 00:22:06 --> 00:22:10 | run is in your own terms. I don't want to say anything more, but I want to, I |
| 193 | 00:22:10 --> 00:22:14 | want to kind of correct it if it's not what I think is appropriate, and if it's |
| 194 | 00:22:14 --> 00:22:19 | right, or if it's in the right perspective, then obviously I'll, I'll |
| 195 | 00:22:19 --> 00:22:23 | come in you for it. But the market trades back up. What's it trade back up? |
| 196 | 00:22:23 --> 00:22:27 | Remember, I told you what this line was. If you missed it, if you came to the |
| 197 | 00:22:27 --> 00:22:32 | stream later, you just signed into it yesterday, at 5pm when we closed the |
| 198 | 00:22:32 --> 00:22:36 | settlement price, and then when we opened up at 6pm there's no difference |
| 199 | 00:22:36 --> 00:22:42 | in between these two prices. So there's no gap. So all I do is annotate that |
| 200 | 00:22:42 --> 00:22:47 | price, because it'll still refer to it. As you can see, we trade back up in what |
| 201 | 00:22:48 --> 00:22:53 | is it trading into? Also, what other Confluence is there? Look close. There's |
| 202 | 00:22:53 --> 00:22:54 | two other things there. I |
| 203 | 00:23:07 --> 00:23:13 | you have that gap, and then you have what I'm discussing here. Whenever you |
| 204 | 00:23:13 --> 00:23:18 | have wicks, you want to measure that. Okay, here's the halfway point or |
| 205 | 00:23:18 --> 00:23:22 | consequent encroachment. This wick is allowed to go through it. Why? Because |
| 206 | 00:23:22 --> 00:23:27 | you have a fair value gap. But then look at this one here. What's the high that |
| 207 | 00:23:27 --> 00:23:30 | you're going to look right over here. Look up and upper left hand corner. |
| 208 | 00:23:31 --> 00:23:38 | What's the high of that candle? Right there, 19,000 09, 6.50 that's exactly |
| 209 | 00:23:38 --> 00:23:43 | the consequence, encroachment level of that wick you're going to tell me that |
| 210 | 00:23:43 --> 00:23:45 | that's buying and selling pressure. |
| 211 | 00:23:47 --> 00:23:49 | Yeah. So |
| 212 | 00:23:50 --> 00:23:56 | when you're looking for entry patterns, when you're looking for targets for for |
| 213 | 00:23:56 --> 00:24:01 | limiting out on partials or terminus, here's your three quarter level, treat |
| 214 | 00:24:01 --> 00:24:08 | it to now, because of this, I want to see it respect this up close candle. In |
| 215 | 00:24:08 --> 00:24:11 | other words, don't, don't trade above it. It can come back and touch it again. |
| 216 | 00:24:11 --> 00:24:15 | It's better if it doesn't leave a little portion here. But I want to see it to |
| 217 | 00:24:15 --> 00:24:21 | explore now, below this 830 news driver, that's what I like to see. But here, |
| 218 | 00:24:22 --> 00:24:27 | this wick trades up to cutting through candles, because it's not supply and |
| 219 | 00:24:27 --> 00:24:31 | demand. We go right back to this wick right here. That candles high to the |
| 220 | 00:24:31 --> 00:24:38 | tick, to the tick gives us the actual high that you can anticipate as it's |
| 221 | 00:24:38 --> 00:24:42 | returning back into here. Why should that be reasonable? Two things. Number |
| 222 | 00:24:42 --> 00:24:50 | one, you have this wick here. Bear with me. I have to put the lipstick on this |
| 223 | 00:24:50 --> 00:25:04 | chart. Just show you what I want to see illustrated when I was, uh. I What else |
| 224 | 00:25:05 --> 00:25:07 | working on this information, |
| 225 | 00:25:12 --> 00:25:16 | figuring it all out, codifying everything and discovering a lot of |
| 226 | 00:25:16 --> 00:25:18 | things that really wasn't in my books. |
| 227 | 00:25:22 --> 00:25:26 | No, just |
| 228 | 00:25:26 --> 00:25:28 | draw a line here it's disappearing. |
| 229 | 00:25:37 --> 00:25:42 | Oh, I know what I did. I have the color |
| 230 | 00:25:51 --> 00:25:56 | so that's going to go on that candle there, and it needs to go to the |
| 231 | 00:25:58 --> 00:25:58 | 50 level, |
| 232 | 00:26:00 --> 00:26:09 | 9650, 9696 50. So now I can take that off, and you can see that that's |
| 233 | 00:26:09 --> 00:26:12 | anchored to here. So this is what you want to be doing, Caleb, you don't want |
| 234 | 00:26:12 --> 00:26:15 | to be leaving your fibonaccis on top of the wicks, because it'll clutter up your |
| 235 | 00:26:15 --> 00:26:19 | chart. It'll make me angry. And it's also you just don't want to have all the |
| 236 | 00:26:19 --> 00:26:24 | information on it, since it's not important to have all that some people |
| 237 | 00:26:24 --> 00:26:29 | are like, still trying to put my stuff on there. Social media doesn't pretend |
| 238 | 00:26:29 --> 00:26:32 | that they're me. So we have this wick here. |
| 239 | 00:26:34 --> 00:26:35 | We have this gap. |
| 240 | 00:26:36 --> 00:26:41 | It trades up to there, and also what's to the left of this candle, the one that |
| 241 | 00:26:41 --> 00:26:48 | trades in the fair value gap, right? So isn't there a wick on this candle? Sure |
| 242 | 00:26:48 --> 00:26:49 | it is. |
| 243 | 00:26:57 --> 00:27:04 | So we have this wick on this candle inside of this fair value gap, and this |
| 244 | 00:27:04 --> 00:27:08 | wick here. So when price was trading off of this target we were looking for, and |
| 245 | 00:27:08 --> 00:27:12 | it rebounded off that came back up into the fair value gap, it's reasonable for |
| 246 | 00:27:12 --> 00:27:15 | it to go up to the fair value gap high, which is this candles low, |
| 247 | 00:27:17 --> 00:27:18 | this, |
| 248 | 00:27:20 --> 00:27:26 | sorry, this price right there on that wick. That's a it's a premium array, |
| 249 | 00:27:26 --> 00:27:31 | because you're trading back up to it. You extend that through, it's part of |
| 250 | 00:27:31 --> 00:27:36 | the fair value gap. And then next candle trades up and touches it. We do not want |
| 251 | 00:27:36 --> 00:27:43 | to see this is important. We do not want to see if it's going to be bearish. We |
| 252 | 00:27:43 --> 00:27:48 | don't want to see that consequent occurring, that wick, once it's traded |
| 253 | 00:27:48 --> 00:27:52 | to here, once it trades back up to it, there, we have this fair value gap that |
| 254 | 00:27:52 --> 00:27:57 | should send price lower or kind of keep it at bay, not trading it higher. So if |
| 255 | 00:27:57 --> 00:28:04 | this candle trading back up to it, we are trusting the logic around this |
| 256 | 00:28:04 --> 00:28:08 | phenomenon, saying that it's already done to work a trading to the high of |
| 257 | 00:28:08 --> 00:28:11 | the fair value gap, so half of the fair value got |
| 258 | 00:28:14 --> 00:28:15 | Let's look at that. |
| 259 | 00:28:20 --> 00:28:26 | Let's see it in here. It doesn't trade there. Notice that on this candle, it |
| 260 | 00:28:26 --> 00:28:31 | does not trade there. Is that a good thing or I was a bad thing? Think about |
| 261 | 00:28:31 --> 00:28:35 | what I've taught you in this mentorship. I taught you that PD arrays very |
| 262 | 00:28:35 --> 00:28:40 | specific levels that we're looking for if they fail to be printed to if they |
| 263 | 00:28:40 --> 00:28:46 | can't even return back to them, and you have a directional bias in in concert |
| 264 | 00:28:46 --> 00:28:50 | with that level you're studying, if it can't go there, that means it's |
| 265 | 00:28:50 --> 00:28:55 | decidedly weak. And when you're bearish, that's a signature you want to see. But |
| 266 | 00:28:57 --> 00:29:00 | because we have this area over here, and because I'm not trading support and |
| 267 | 00:29:00 --> 00:29:03 | resistance. The Support and Resistance fellows would have been like, Okay, |
| 268 | 00:29:03 --> 00:29:06 | here's where we stopped. So let's draw that line out in time. Well, we went, we |
| 269 | 00:29:06 --> 00:29:13 | missed that, to some random Up, Up Up Close candle, and created the wick, |
| 270 | 00:29:13 --> 00:29:16 | something random. We don't know why it went there, right? Support Resistance |
| 271 | 00:29:16 --> 00:29:21 | folks don't have any idea why it did that, but you're learning it. It's this |
| 272 | 00:29:21 --> 00:29:27 | wick here. It trades up to it completes and fulfills the role of buy side |
| 273 | 00:29:27 --> 00:29:32 | delivery, which was inefficient on this candle. So the market is offered single |
| 274 | 00:29:32 --> 00:29:36 | pass to the downside. So it's a sell side delivery. That means price is going |
| 275 | 00:29:36 --> 00:29:44 | lower, then it comes back up to RE deliver, the inefficiency in this time |
| 276 | 00:29:44 --> 00:29:50 | of that one candle, what was it inefficient on delivery to the upside. |
| 277 | 00:29:50 --> 00:29:56 | So buy side delivery, it offers it stops to the tick and then drops down the next |
| 278 | 00:29:56 --> 00:30:01 | candle. If you're looking for support, I'm sorry. Looking for swing highs and |
| 279 | 00:30:01 --> 00:30:07 | swing lows. You want to see it trade up into levels like this. It should hit |
| 280 | 00:30:07 --> 00:30:13 | that and stop. And also failed trade to half of that fair value gap. That's a |
| 281 | 00:30:13 --> 00:30:17 | failure to get to concent encroachment. We've already fulfilled three factors |
| 282 | 00:30:17 --> 00:30:23 | here. We traded up to finish in filling out this candle is low to the difference |
| 283 | 00:30:23 --> 00:30:26 | of this candle high, which is that fair Bay gap right there. That's a city sell |
| 284 | 00:30:26 --> 00:30:32 | side and balance by sudden efficiency, we trade back to the 6pm opening price. |
| 285 | 00:30:35 --> 00:30:40 | Why is that important? Because there's no gap between Friday the 5pm closed |
| 286 | 00:30:40 --> 00:30:43 | settlement price and where we started trading for NQ. So because there's no |
| 287 | 00:30:43 --> 00:30:48 | gap, we just simply use a 6pm opening price. I told you when we were up here |
| 288 | 00:30:48 --> 00:30:51 | you're going to have on your chart, because it's going to be treated the |
| 289 | 00:30:51 --> 00:30:54 | same way. It'll trade through it and come back and treat it as a key level. |
| 290 | 00:30:55 --> 00:30:59 | It trades through it on a wick, which is reasonable, because we're inside the |
| 291 | 00:30:59 --> 00:31:04 | spare value gap. But this level here, when we traded back up to it, notice |
| 292 | 00:31:04 --> 00:31:11 | that the bodies in the candles do not trade and close above that wick. |
| 293 | 00:31:11 --> 00:31:18 | Consequence, see that it's telling you that this candle backed off. So that |
| 294 | 00:31:18 --> 00:31:21 | means when I see something like that, I'm looking for the immediate next |
| 295 | 00:31:21 --> 00:31:28 | candle to do a lower high than this high. And I can reframe everything on |
| 296 | 00:31:28 --> 00:31:32 | that fair value gap and where that consequent encroachment is on that wick. |
| 297 | 00:31:32 --> 00:31:35 | If it's there. You may not have a wick over here, then you would just simply go |
| 298 | 00:31:35 --> 00:31:40 | into the details of simply using the 6pm opening price, which is this dashed |
| 299 | 00:31:40 --> 00:31:43 | line, and the consequent encroachment of that fair value gap. So in other words, |
| 300 | 00:31:43 --> 00:31:48 | if this wasn't here, I would expect this to trade up to midpoint of the fair |
| 301 | 00:31:48 --> 00:31:53 | value gap. But if it doesn't, and it trades down lower, I'll simply just go |
| 302 | 00:31:53 --> 00:31:58 | in short on the open and touching back this body right here, as it does there. |
| 303 | 00:32:00 --> 00:32:04 | So and that could be easily done on a 15 second chart, a 32nd chart, a five |
| 304 | 00:32:04 --> 00:32:08 | second chart, you'd see a little bit more detail in that difference between |
| 305 | 00:32:08 --> 00:32:12 | where we closed on this one minute candle to where we open there. And I |
| 306 | 00:32:12 --> 00:32:16 | know some of you because you're you're leaving comments saying that you don't |
| 307 | 00:32:16 --> 00:32:22 | have the ability to afford the real time data. I gotta be honest with you, at |
| 308 | 00:32:22 --> 00:32:25 | some degree, you're going to have to do that if you're going to trade. You have |
| 309 | 00:32:25 --> 00:32:30 | to have the information. And I don't know how to say it any nicer than if you |
| 310 | 00:32:30 --> 00:32:34 | can't afford data and watching Real Time price action. A lot of the things I'm |
| 311 | 00:32:34 --> 00:32:37 | teaching are going to just simply be outside your grasp, and you're going to |
| 312 | 00:32:37 --> 00:32:40 | have to use a hard time frame premise. And there's nothing wrong with that. It |
| 313 | 00:32:40 --> 00:32:44 | just means that you're going to have to defer these very small intraday price |
| 314 | 00:32:44 --> 00:32:49 | action moves. But all the things I'm teaching here, this could simply just be |
| 315 | 00:32:49 --> 00:32:53 | a daily chart, in other words, every instead of one minute candlesticks, and |
| 316 | 00:32:53 --> 00:32:57 | this representing the highest high, the lowest low, and where it started and |
| 317 | 00:32:57 --> 00:33:01 | ended trading for that one minute interval, these could represent a daily |
| 318 | 00:33:02 --> 00:33:05 | high, low and open and close for the day. It's the same stuff. It's nice. |
| 319 | 00:33:05 --> 00:33:09 | Don't, don't think it only works on one minute charts or intricate charts. It's |
| 320 | 00:33:09 --> 00:33:14 | that's not it. These levels will be referred to on any and every time frame. |
| 321 | 00:33:15 --> 00:33:20 | If I was watching price over nq, and we had the time frame set to four hour |
| 322 | 00:33:20 --> 00:33:26 | chart price right now, at 4175 is the same price. You'd see it on a four hour |
| 323 | 00:33:26 --> 00:33:31 | chart. Price is price. But if you're looking for details, for precision, you |
| 324 | 00:33:31 --> 00:33:37 | want to look for very sensitive timing, so it gets you into a trade and or |
| 325 | 00:33:37 --> 00:33:42 | reduce the measure of risk. You're always going to have risk, but you can |
| 326 | 00:33:42 --> 00:33:46 | reduce the risk and manage it appropriately by having intraday charts, |
| 327 | 00:33:46 --> 00:33:51 | because you can see, you can see details in price action that otherwise you're |
| 328 | 00:33:51 --> 00:33:55 | not aware of. Okay? And that's kind of like why I was tapping into the memory |
| 329 | 00:33:55 --> 00:34:00 | of how it was for me when I was driving around in a Suzu cargo truck, you know, |
| 330 | 00:34:00 --> 00:34:06 | delivering cane soda cakes and chips and coffee products and cold food and ice |
| 331 | 00:34:06 --> 00:34:14 | creams. I was looking at just simply data, and I had to, later on, go back in |
| 332 | 00:34:14 --> 00:34:18 | and remember, well, my notations as I was driving. Sometimes I missed it, and |
| 333 | 00:34:18 --> 00:34:22 | I had to figure out, okay, well, I was in traffic. I'm trying to get around |
| 334 | 00:34:22 --> 00:34:26 | this guy or get around that part of town, and I couldn't look at the data, |
| 335 | 00:34:26 --> 00:34:29 | even though it's right in front of me, duct taped on my windshield. So it was |
| 336 | 00:34:29 --> 00:34:34 | like a hillbilly version of a ICT, right? I mean, you're all impressed with |
| 337 | 00:34:34 --> 00:34:39 | the NASA spread out of all my monitors and stuff I shared on YouTube. But back |
| 338 | 00:34:39 --> 00:34:43 | then, I didn't start like that. I had, literally, like this little transistor |
| 339 | 00:34:43 --> 00:34:48 | radio type thing, physically duct tape to make sure it stayed in my view and it |
| 340 | 00:34:48 --> 00:34:53 | wouldn't fall and break. But I had to take the notations and say, Okay, I |
| 341 | 00:34:53 --> 00:34:56 | don't know when it started taking that run because I wasn't watching it. I'm |
| 342 | 00:34:56 --> 00:34:59 | driving still, which isn't safe. I'm not recommending this at all for anybody, |
| 343 | 00:34:59 --> 00:35:04 | but. But I was the original, you know, driver being distracted by cell phone, |
| 344 | 00:35:04 --> 00:35:08 | because that was like the equivalent of a smartphone today back then. So I was |
| 345 | 00:35:08 --> 00:35:13 | more interested riding over the Key Bridge, watching those numbers than |
| 346 | 00:35:13 --> 00:35:18 | watching anything else. And look at the response right off of that level there. |
| 347 | 00:35:19 --> 00:35:25 | See that in that nice, just that alone, that one single pass like this, that was |
| 348 | 00:35:25 --> 00:35:30 | enough to draw my interest into seeing what's what's, what's going on. There is |
| 349 | 00:35:30 --> 00:35:34 | it repeating, and I'd go through data and I'd see it again and again and again |
| 350 | 00:35:34 --> 00:35:44 | and again, and it caused a an obsessive compulsive desire to figure out what was |
| 351 | 00:35:44 --> 00:35:49 | repeating there. And then, when I go back through price action, I would see |
| 352 | 00:35:49 --> 00:35:53 | all these little details, okay, and then say, Okay, this is what's this is what's |
| 353 | 00:35:53 --> 00:35:58 | occurring at this time. This is what's occurring at this time on that day. And |
| 354 | 00:35:58 --> 00:36:02 | then, if we had a big news driver, which I didn't understand too much initially, |
| 355 | 00:36:02 --> 00:36:05 | when I first started trading, like I didn't care or even worry about an |
| 356 | 00:36:05 --> 00:36:09 | account counter, so when I was in there trying to trade if there was ever a |
| 357 | 00:36:09 --> 00:36:13 | grain report that came out, or if they were, if I was trading credible, and I |
| 358 | 00:36:13 --> 00:36:19 | didn't look at the inventory numbers that come out, like around 1030 New York |
| 359 | 00:36:19 --> 00:36:22 | local time in the market would create these moves. And I think, Whoa, where |
| 360 | 00:36:22 --> 00:36:25 | the hell that come from? Because I didn't have any understanding about an |
| 361 | 00:36:25 --> 00:36:30 | economic encounter. So I started way too soon with money, and I didn't know what |
| 362 | 00:36:30 --> 00:36:35 | I was doing. And back then, I was like a cowboy. I just gun sling. It's all, it's |
| 363 | 00:36:35 --> 00:36:40 | all I wanted to do is be a part of it, thinking, which is what I have taught |
| 364 | 00:36:40 --> 00:36:44 | against now, because I did that stuff, I tried to learn how to do it with real |
| 365 | 00:36:44 --> 00:36:47 | money, and it caused all kinds of problems, and it slowed my growth. But |
| 366 | 00:36:49 --> 00:36:54 | when we're looking for these wicks, okay, wicks are going to give you so |
| 367 | 00:36:54 --> 00:37:01 | much more detail if you are using them in proper context. Okay, so I'm watching |
| 368 | 00:37:01 --> 00:37:05 | this as I'm talking. I'm looking at this little gap in here. Does it overtake it, |
| 369 | 00:37:05 --> 00:37:11 | come back down tree to support or is it respect it, and then roll over and take |
| 370 | 00:37:11 --> 00:37:15 | out the relative equal loads it's formed here, and then explore the lows at 830 |
| 371 | 00:37:16 --> 00:37:24 | but the if I'm looking for turns, okay, when I learned about swing highs and |
| 372 | 00:37:24 --> 00:37:25 | swing lows, |
| 373 | 00:37:26 --> 00:37:30 | we learned them as ring highs and ring lows. Okay, we didn't call them swing |
| 374 | 00:37:30 --> 00:37:33 | highs and swing lows. And the reason why is because, you know, you would simply |
| 375 | 00:37:33 --> 00:37:38 | print your charts out, or not print them out, that you would literally draw them |
| 376 | 00:37:38 --> 00:37:44 | out. So back when I was learning how to trade, we had a service called price |
| 377 | 00:37:44 --> 00:37:51 | charts, and they would mail you one set of price charts for the week, and then |
| 378 | 00:37:52 --> 00:37:57 | you would take the opening price, the high, the low and the close, and you |
| 379 | 00:37:57 --> 00:38:00 | would draw them physically on the chart, because it would give you room. That's |
| 380 | 00:38:00 --> 00:38:05 | the way I learned how to do this stuff. And you have no idea the advantages of |
| 381 | 00:38:05 --> 00:38:09 | what you're learning and how fast you're learning it, because 99% of you would |
| 382 | 00:38:09 --> 00:38:13 | have never stuck with it if it was like that. They need to think of it and being |
| 383 | 00:38:13 --> 00:38:17 | described like that, you're probably thinking, There's no way. There's no |
| 384 | 00:38:17 --> 00:38:22 | way, but everybody that's 30 years or more in trading. That's the way it was. |
| 385 | 00:38:23 --> 00:38:28 | Like that, that's, that's the way it was. I mean, people, you know, we |
| 386 | 00:38:28 --> 00:38:32 | watched, I watched my generation. We watched things become computerized. I |
| 387 | 00:38:32 --> 00:38:38 | watched electronic trading. I was part of that last generation of old school |
| 388 | 00:38:39 --> 00:38:46 | OGS, where price charting was done by hand, every individual candle, and the |
| 389 | 00:38:46 --> 00:38:52 | only thing you did that with was on a daily chart. See that little run right |
| 390 | 00:38:53 --> 00:38:59 | there. You have to have favorite gap trades up into it plummets, and the |
| 391 | 00:38:59 --> 00:39:03 | interest is below that low. So if it does this, we want to see a big again, |
| 392 | 00:39:03 --> 00:39:09 | we see a big handle like that expand lower. So the it's gonna be fun watching |
| 393 | 00:39:09 --> 00:39:13 | somebody knows what we're talking about in an interesting so it's there at the |
| 394 | 00:39:13 --> 00:39:17 | chart, not knowing what's gonna do the but I'm also giving all kinds of |
| 395 | 00:39:17 --> 00:39:25 | information that are just to just gold. Because this information if you look for |
| 396 | 00:39:25 --> 00:39:29 | swing highs and swing lows, which is what we called a ring high in a ring |
| 397 | 00:39:29 --> 00:39:34 | low, because, for instance, like this little candlestick high, it has a lower |
| 398 | 00:39:34 --> 00:39:39 | high to the left of it. Here, a high that's lower to the right of it than |
| 399 | 00:39:39 --> 00:39:42 | that one. So notice we have a candle that has a high that has a lower high to |
| 400 | 00:39:42 --> 00:39:47 | the left and a lower high to the right. So we call that a swing high. But on my |
| 401 | 00:39:47 --> 00:39:51 | chart, if this was a daily chart, I would put a little circle or a ring |
| 402 | 00:39:51 --> 00:39:55 | right above that. So that way, when I looked at my charts, I could map out |
| 403 | 00:39:55 --> 00:39:59 | market structure. I could see where we walk, where we are, in deference to you. |
| 404 | 00:40:00 --> 00:40:04 | Previous swing highs and swing lows. And if I start seeing swing highs that are |
| 405 | 00:40:04 --> 00:40:10 | forming that are lower than a cluster of swing highs further back then, I know |
| 406 | 00:40:10 --> 00:40:14 | I'm probably part of an intermediate term price run, which is kind of like |
| 407 | 00:40:14 --> 00:40:17 | what I was hinting at here with going all this business here. We talked about |
| 408 | 00:40:17 --> 00:40:22 | it trading down to the midpoint when it was here. We were focusing there, |
| 409 | 00:40:22 --> 00:40:26 | because we're looking for too much of a precision element. Here's where you |
| 410 | 00:40:26 --> 00:40:29 | would have failed using an entry you would not have been filled but the |
| 411 | 00:40:29 --> 00:40:33 | market runs with you. Okay, if you couldn't get in there, then you can use |
| 412 | 00:40:33 --> 00:40:39 | this. You see that, okay, say you couldn't get in here, but then you have |
| 413 | 00:40:39 --> 00:40:44 | the market come back up and trade into this candlestick here. We don't want to |
| 414 | 00:40:44 --> 00:40:50 | see a trade above that candle. There was a gap here, but it trades all the way |
| 415 | 00:40:50 --> 00:40:55 | back up, but it does not take out the high. See that trades right back to what |
| 416 | 00:40:57 --> 00:41:02 | consequent crochet that wick I talked about at 830 this could be your entry. |
| 417 | 00:41:05 --> 00:41:11 | This could be your entry. What? Let me test your memory and see if you kept |
| 418 | 00:41:11 --> 00:41:17 | good notes. What is this candlestick providing you? In terms of an entry |
| 419 | 00:41:17 --> 00:41:20 | mechanism? I talked about it yesterday. I talked about it a lot, if you've been |
| 420 | 00:41:20 --> 00:41:25 | my student for a while, but this candle right here, what? What is this candle? |
| 421 | 00:41:26 --> 00:41:32 | When it traded there like that? What is that referred to? I'll give you a sip of |
| 422 | 00:41:32 --> 00:41:39 | mine, I think, a sip of my water. Institutional, order, flow, entry, |
| 423 | 00:41:39 --> 00:41:45 | drill, very, very, very long winded name, okay? And you're probably saying, |
| 424 | 00:41:45 --> 00:41:52 | Why did you name it that? When I teach students how to trade in efficiencies |
| 425 | 00:41:52 --> 00:41:58 | and price action and fair value gaps, when you have a a price run, okay, once |
| 426 | 00:41:58 --> 00:42:04 | it enters a significant and obvious sell side program or sell program, and it's |
| 427 | 00:42:04 --> 00:42:08 | sell side delivery that means the market simply just moving lower. Okay, there's |
| 428 | 00:42:08 --> 00:42:15 | there's characteristics, there's identifications that I use. And |
| 429 | 00:42:15 --> 00:42:19 | sometimes when I'll say those, you'll hear me say, okay, sell side delivery. |
| 430 | 00:42:19 --> 00:42:25 | You're thinking sell side liquidity or sell stops. That's not what this is. |
| 431 | 00:42:25 --> 00:42:30 | Sell side delivery is a sell program where the market is going through the |
| 432 | 00:42:30 --> 00:42:34 | motions of delivering lower prices, and it doesn't matter how many people's |
| 433 | 00:42:34 --> 00:42:38 | buying, doesn't matter how many people are selling, it's just algorithmically |
| 434 | 00:42:38 --> 00:42:43 | spooling in a direction. And if it's sell side delivery, it's going lower for |
| 435 | 00:42:43 --> 00:42:47 | the Express purposes of delivering lower prices. And it matters not how much |
| 436 | 00:42:47 --> 00:42:51 | buying and selling pressure is there, okay, but when I teach, and when I |
| 437 | 00:42:51 --> 00:42:55 | taught students using these inefficiencies, we outlined, when we |
| 438 | 00:42:55 --> 00:43:00 | were up here, that we first want to see a trade there. And then we talked about |
| 439 | 00:43:00 --> 00:43:04 | all business in here. And then we talked about going next target was the lower |
| 440 | 00:43:04 --> 00:43:07 | quadrant, which is there. This is not quarters theories, by the way. Quarters |
| 441 | 00:43:07 --> 00:43:10 | theories is a bunch of bullshit. So I'm going to say it and stop asking me the |
| 442 | 00:43:10 --> 00:43:13 | comment section. I'm sure there's some very nice people out there, and they |
| 443 | 00:43:13 --> 00:43:17 | have their their faith based ideas around it, but it's absolutely |
| 444 | 00:43:17 --> 00:43:21 | horseshit. So just know that that's my opinion. Please stop asking me about it. |
| 445 | 00:43:21 --> 00:43:24 | The The low is the next target. Why? Because there's the liquidity resting |
| 446 | 00:43:24 --> 00:43:31 | below. So that's sell side liquidity. The motion from here to here that run |
| 447 | 00:43:31 --> 00:43:38 | right there. That's sell side delivery. This high down to this lower quadrant is |
| 448 | 00:43:38 --> 00:43:41 | sell side delivery. It's delivering lower prices, and then the up close |
| 449 | 00:43:42 --> 00:43:46 | candle said we didn't want to see it go above that. In case you're wondering, |
| 450 | 00:43:48 --> 00:43:55 | here's the high did we trade above it? No. Okay, so having order block theory, |
| 451 | 00:43:55 --> 00:43:58 | having fair value gap theory, having market structure theory, having |
| 452 | 00:43:58 --> 00:44:02 | institutional order flow theory, real institutional order, flow. Do you see |
| 453 | 00:44:02 --> 00:44:06 | any depth of market over here? Do you see any horizontal volume, things that |
| 454 | 00:44:06 --> 00:44:11 | make it look like I'm technically advanced? No, you don't need that. All |
| 455 | 00:44:11 --> 00:44:18 | you need to know is, where, where is the mark? Okay, who, who in the room is the |
| 456 | 00:44:18 --> 00:44:22 | mark? Who's the victim? Because if you can, if you can determine who the victim |
| 457 | 00:44:22 --> 00:44:30 | is in the room, you know who's about to fall, who's who's going to get something |
| 458 | 00:44:30 --> 00:44:37 | they ain't wanting. Okay, if you can't identify the victim in the room and |
| 459 | 00:44:37 --> 00:44:41 | something's about to go down, you're the mark. The same thing happens in the |
| 460 | 00:44:41 --> 00:44:45 | marketplace. If you can't determine the liquidity that's about to be absorbed, |
| 461 | 00:44:46 --> 00:44:53 | engaged, taken out, you're the liquidity you're going to be used as the cannon |
| 462 | 00:44:53 --> 00:44:54 | fodder for someone else's trade, like money. |
| 463 | 00:44:55 --> 00:44:56 | Okay, so |
| 464 | 00:44:58 --> 00:45:04 | this is sell side with. Covid, yeah. But the way my son needs to start looking at |
| 465 | 00:45:04 --> 00:45:10 | these runs from seeing this to this target, there has to be something |
| 466 | 00:45:10 --> 00:45:14 | measurable. Well, that clearly it's immeasurable, and you don't have to be |
| 467 | 00:45:14 --> 00:45:17 | in that trade there. There's, there's lots of trades here for my career where |
| 468 | 00:45:18 --> 00:45:26 | I could have got in at the highest tick, but it wouldn't afford me to fill even |
| 469 | 00:45:26 --> 00:45:31 | offering it by the print, by the time and sales it traded there, but my volume |
| 470 | 00:45:31 --> 00:45:36 | and contract size wouldn't permit it to be filled there, and it ran without me. |
| 471 | 00:45:36 --> 00:45:40 | And then I had to figure out later on, as a consequence to that, I had to |
| 472 | 00:45:40 --> 00:45:44 | figure out other entry mechanisms, because I would be frustrated and angry |
| 473 | 00:45:44 --> 00:45:48 | about missing those moves, thinking that I am if I couldn't get in that trade |
| 474 | 00:45:48 --> 00:45:54 | here, and I'm aiming for this, this and this and something lower, well, if I |
| 475 | 00:45:54 --> 00:45:58 | didn't, if I couldn't get in there, then I'm done. I'm angry, and I'm pissed off. |
| 476 | 00:45:58 --> 00:46:01 | And I couldn't, I couldn't imagine another opportunity to get in, because |
| 477 | 00:46:01 --> 00:46:08 | this was all I knew at the time, which is why I developed the price delivery |
| 478 | 00:46:08 --> 00:46:14 | continuum theory, where it's you seeing something that's underway. I gave you to |
| 479 | 00:46:14 --> 00:46:19 | what we were going to see today when we first started the stream again. I wish I |
| 480 | 00:46:19 --> 00:46:23 | could have got this stuff to work like it should. It would have been a lot |
| 481 | 00:46:23 --> 00:46:27 | better, but I'm already doing far better than you're going to see anybody else |
| 482 | 00:46:27 --> 00:46:31 | talk about on YouTube, knocks against anybody. I'm just being honest. You're |
| 483 | 00:46:31 --> 00:46:34 | not going to see this level of detail. You're not going to get the depth of |
| 484 | 00:46:34 --> 00:46:37 | understanding. You're not going to get it beforehand. You're not going to get |
| 485 | 00:46:37 --> 00:46:41 | all the little, tiny, subtle nuances, because they don't know and you don't |
| 486 | 00:46:41 --> 00:46:44 | need to know this. You can buy and sell indicators and probably do something |
| 487 | 00:46:44 --> 00:46:48 | mathematically with money management and be profitable. I'm not saying that you |
| 488 | 00:46:48 --> 00:46:53 | can't, but I'm not satisfied with that. Like I'm a technical freak, like I have |
| 489 | 00:46:53 --> 00:46:57 | to know, like I have to know why it's going to do it, when it's going to do |
| 490 | 00:46:57 --> 00:47:03 | it, and how I can trust it. So that way I can be lead leagues ahead, light years |
| 491 | 00:47:03 --> 00:47:07 | ahead of everyone else that looks at these same charts. That's that's always |
| 492 | 00:47:07 --> 00:47:13 | been my my driving force is to be absolutely phenomenal and freakish. |
| 493 | 00:47:14 --> 00:47:18 | That's been my goal. It's my pursuit, and I try to instill that in my |
| 494 | 00:47:18 --> 00:47:21 | students, but they equate that as they have to know that right away, as soon as |
| 495 | 00:47:21 --> 00:47:25 | they start reading it and studying it and listening to me and they think just |
| 496 | 00:47:25 --> 00:47:30 | because they wrote some scribble in a journal, that that equates to I'm doing |
| 497 | 00:47:30 --> 00:47:35 | the work. No, you're just now introducing yourself to it. It has to be |
| 498 | 00:47:35 --> 00:47:39 | a lifestyle like you have to constantly be pouring into these charts, listening |
| 499 | 00:47:39 --> 00:47:42 | to my lectures. Really dig into what I'm saying, because I'm not talking for the |
| 500 | 00:47:42 --> 00:47:46 | sake of just talking. I'm giving you detail that you aren't going to fully |
| 501 | 00:47:46 --> 00:47:51 | appreciate, because where you're at when you first start listening to them |
| 502 | 00:47:51 --> 00:47:54 | already, you're thinking it's too long. I ain't got time for this. Give me |
| 503 | 00:47:54 --> 00:47:58 | somebody else going to reduce this. Give me a PDF. Let me find tonight it does. |
| 504 | 00:47:58 --> 00:48:01 | Gives me the cliff notes you're never going to learn from that. You'll be able |
| 505 | 00:48:01 --> 00:48:06 | to hear the buzz words, and you can talk the terminology in hindsight, but you're |
| 506 | 00:48:06 --> 00:48:10 | never going to do what I'm doing here that will always evade you, because the |
| 507 | 00:48:10 --> 00:48:14 | people you're learning from, they can't do that. They can't do it okay. And the |
| 508 | 00:48:14 --> 00:48:20 | things I'm teaching today, they've not been taught before. Mentorship students |
| 509 | 00:48:20 --> 00:48:23 | that paid me, they did not learn what I'm teaching you here. This is all brand |
| 510 | 00:48:23 --> 00:48:30 | new stuff. So the price delivery continuum theory is where, if we |
| 511 | 00:48:30 --> 00:48:37 | identify a move and anticipate it delivering to a target, that is, it's |
| 512 | 00:48:38 --> 00:48:42 | finite. It's not something that well, you know, it could do this. It could do |
| 513 | 00:48:42 --> 00:48:46 | that like a zone. I don't deal with zones. Zones are for fools and idiots. |
| 514 | 00:48:47 --> 00:48:53 | We don't deal with zones. We deal with very specific price levels. If I don't |
| 515 | 00:48:53 --> 00:48:57 | know the price that I'm wanting to see as a entry, a stop or a partial or |
| 516 | 00:48:57 --> 00:49:01 | Terminus target where the trade is completely closed in, if I don't know |
| 517 | 00:49:01 --> 00:49:10 | that specific price I'm not getting in the trade. Contrast that with supply and |
| 518 | 00:49:10 --> 00:49:17 | demand zones. Okay, what are you doing with that? What what criteria are you? |
| 519 | 00:49:17 --> 00:49:21 | And if you teach it, what criteria are you teaching the people that are |
| 520 | 00:49:21 --> 00:49:24 | listening to you what's the methodology that you're going to come to the same |
| 521 | 00:49:25 --> 00:49:31 | conclusion and process protocol guidance that leads you to a specific price in |
| 522 | 00:49:31 --> 00:49:37 | that zone. Which zone is important? Which part of the zone, what prices in |
| 523 | 00:49:37 --> 00:49:41 | those specific supply and demand zones are you interested in? That's why it's a |
| 524 | 00:49:41 --> 00:49:48 | fallacy. It's a fucking joke, okay? It's a wonderful, infantile approach to a |
| 525 | 00:49:48 --> 00:49:53 | more visual representation of support and resistance. That was the furthest |
| 526 | 00:49:53 --> 00:49:56 | accolade I gave it, and I mentioned that same stuff when I was on baby piss, |
| 527 | 00:49:56 --> 00:50:00 | because idiots over there said the same shit. Oh, you'd read. Teaching supply |
| 528 | 00:50:00 --> 00:50:04 | and demand, mother fucker. Everything I'm showing you here has nothing to do |
| 529 | 00:50:04 --> 00:50:07 | with supply and demand, and it has nothing to do with support and |
| 530 | 00:50:07 --> 00:50:14 | resistance, but it tells you to the tick to the tick, and it doesn't matter what |
| 531 | 00:50:14 --> 00:50:18 | market it is. You're not getting that from support and resistance and supply |
| 532 | 00:50:18 --> 00:50:21 | and demand. You're fucking not doing that. I don't give a shit what time |
| 533 | 00:50:21 --> 00:50:24 | thinking here, he said. Dollar mentor, mentors, mentorships, okay? And the |
| 534 | 00:50:24 --> 00:50:28 | people that run them, they need the back pedal, because if they're using supply |
| 535 | 00:50:28 --> 00:50:31 | and demand, and they're trying to sell that shit many times, if you really, |
| 536 | 00:50:31 --> 00:50:34 | really listen to them, they're really trying to teach order block theory, |
| 537 | 00:50:35 --> 00:50:39 | they're trying to teach what I do, and they're falling short of it, okay? And I |
| 538 | 00:50:39 --> 00:50:42 | know this is the part of the videos you don't like, but I have to answer all |
| 539 | 00:50:42 --> 00:50:45 | these things because people send me shit and they question me, and I fill in a |
| 540 | 00:50:45 --> 00:50:52 | lot of questions within my dialog. And also scratches an inch once I once I get |
| 541 | 00:50:52 --> 00:50:58 | it. Once in a while, have to scratch it like anybody else will. But if you have |
| 542 | 00:50:58 --> 00:51:06 | wicks in your charts, okay, every single time you have a wick, every single time |
| 543 | 00:51:06 --> 00:51:11 | you want to be measuring them from the highest high and the lowest low. Okay, |
| 544 | 00:51:12 --> 00:51:19 | because in swing highs and in swing lows, it's going to give you detail that |
| 545 | 00:51:19 --> 00:51:28 | no body else has but me, but me, good old ICT. But you're going to get to |
| 546 | 00:51:28 --> 00:51:35 | that. You're going to get it. You're getting it right from the source, if |
| 547 | 00:51:35 --> 00:51:38 | there's going to be a hobby. And this is on any time frame, folks, okay, write |
| 548 | 00:51:38 --> 00:51:43 | that down in your journal, on your study notes, this is a principle that is all |
| 549 | 00:51:43 --> 00:51:50 | time frames, every single time frame, and this is what you'll find. This |
| 550 | 00:51:50 --> 00:51:57 | fascinating, if you go through all time frames and you study this and to see |
| 551 | 00:51:57 --> 00:52:04 | them form on sub one minute charts, and it's still there. That is, it's |
| 552 | 00:52:04 --> 00:52:12 | incredible. It is incredible to see it's incredible to see your baby do exactly |
| 553 | 00:52:12 --> 00:52:18 | what it's supposed to do. And it's so pretty. It's so beautiful to see it |
| 554 | 00:52:18 --> 00:52:31 | form. And sometimes, when the people that use it push hard and intervene with |
| 555 | 00:52:31 --> 00:52:37 | it, take it out of its processes and and what it's following at the time its |
| 556 | 00:52:37 --> 00:52:41 | script, and they cause a manual intervention, then it gets a little |
| 557 | 00:52:41 --> 00:52:46 | blurred, but if you just simply wait, it'll go right back to doing what it's |
| 558 | 00:52:46 --> 00:52:52 | supposed to be doing, rigged, controlled price delivery. That's exactly what we |
| 559 | 00:52:52 --> 00:52:55 | have. And there's no reason to be upset about it. There's no reason to fear it. |
| 560 | 00:52:55 --> 00:52:58 | You should be thankful it's this way, because I'll be honest with you, with 30 |
| 561 | 00:52:58 --> 00:53:02 | years experience, if these markets weren't rigged. If they were not rigged, |
| 562 | 00:53:02 --> 00:53:05 | I would never trade them, because you have the equivalent of doing the same |
| 563 | 00:53:05 --> 00:53:10 | thing that people do when they buy lottery tickets going to the casinos. |
| 564 | 00:53:10 --> 00:53:15 | That, to me, is madness. But if I can go in and I can see, okay, I can |
| 565 | 00:53:15 --> 00:53:17 | systematically prove, |
| 566 | 00:53:19 --> 00:53:19 | prove |
| 567 | 00:53:21 --> 00:53:28 | that these things are happening. They're predictable to a degree of precision. It |
| 568 | 00:53:28 --> 00:53:32 | presses the viewer, or anyone that studies and looks at it, especially when |
| 569 | 00:53:32 --> 00:53:37 | we're doing it live, it forces them into a corner, and they're like, either this |
| 570 | 00:53:37 --> 00:53:42 | guy has a time machine or he's using delayed data, and I'm using the lowest |
| 571 | 00:53:42 --> 00:53:47 | latency on this live stream, and I have students that verify I'm seconds away, |
| 572 | 00:53:47 --> 00:53:52 | seconds away from when you see it and when it happens. And if you have real |
| 573 | 00:53:52 --> 00:53:55 | time data, you already see what I'm annotating on the chart. I tell you |
| 574 | 00:53:55 --> 00:53:58 | where it's going to go beforehand, so it doesn't matter. It could be delayed |
| 575 | 00:53:58 --> 00:54:01 | 1015, minutes. It's still in the chart before it's there, and then when it |
| 576 | 00:54:01 --> 00:54:05 | finally delivers, there you go. There's no escaping it. So it's predictable. |
| 577 | 00:54:06 --> 00:54:10 | It's logic that's transferable. You can learn it. But if you're looking for |
| 578 | 00:54:10 --> 00:54:14 | turning points in price, that means short term highs, intermediate term |
| 579 | 00:54:14 --> 00:54:20 | highs, long term highs, short term lows, intermediate term lows, long term lows, |
| 580 | 00:54:21 --> 00:54:26 | where they nest out. In the grand scheme of things, when you have a directional |
| 581 | 00:54:27 --> 00:54:32 | draw on liquidity, that's discernible, that means that you you can reasonably |
| 582 | 00:54:32 --> 00:54:37 | forecast where the market's trying to go to. That's the first lesson for you. |
| 583 | 00:54:37 --> 00:54:43 | Kayla, all of this stuff is just once you get beyond that, when you're when |
| 584 | 00:54:43 --> 00:54:49 | you're studying for the day, and you watch and observe where price is going, |
| 585 | 00:54:49 --> 00:54:52 | and you're watching the live streams like this, and you see that telling you |
| 586 | 00:54:52 --> 00:54:55 | where it's going to go, and it goes there. Then you go in and you fill in |
| 587 | 00:54:55 --> 00:55:01 | your observations in the chart, you annotate how much time it took. For this |
| 588 | 00:55:01 --> 00:55:05 | run from here down to that level, we were aiming for any make notations how |
| 589 | 00:55:05 --> 00:55:10 | the bodies turned right at that level traded back up into the fair value gap, |
| 590 | 00:55:10 --> 00:55:15 | consequent encroachment of this wick, because it's a wick that's above price |
| 591 | 00:55:15 --> 00:55:21 | when it was down here. So if it returns back to that that's a premium array. But |
| 592 | 00:55:21 --> 00:55:30 | I don't care about the low. You see that. I don't care about that low. I |
| 593 | 00:55:30 --> 00:55:34 | want to see it trade through that. I want to see it dig into this and go |
| 594 | 00:55:34 --> 00:55:39 | right back to that. Because if it can do that, then I'm waiting to see, does it |
| 595 | 00:55:39 --> 00:55:47 | stop, or if it wicks through it, does the body that it pierces it with? Does |
| 596 | 00:55:47 --> 00:55:51 | its body stop at or below that consequent encroachment? Because that's |
| 597 | 00:55:51 --> 00:55:55 | the signature. That's the little deal. That's a little telltale sign. That's |
| 598 | 00:55:56 --> 00:56:00 | that's me at the table. I'm the dealer. Okay, I can run up a deck and stack the |
| 599 | 00:56:00 --> 00:56:04 | deck, and I can send somebody a hand of winning cards, and everybody at the |
| 600 | 00:56:04 --> 00:56:08 | table won't even know it, and they could be a Confederate with me, and we run the |
| 601 | 00:56:08 --> 00:56:13 | table every single rounders. Matt Damon, and what's the gentleman. He lives in |
| 602 | 00:56:13 --> 00:56:18 | Maryland. He played the Incredible Hulk, Edward Norton. He plays the guy that |
| 603 | 00:56:18 --> 00:56:22 | does all the chops he was in prison, came out. And while he was in prison, he |
| 604 | 00:56:22 --> 00:56:26 | was learning how to do all this stuff with cards. And Matt Damon was a good |
| 605 | 00:56:26 --> 00:56:32 | poker player, but Ed Norton was a cheat. So when Ed Norton was dealing, he was |
| 606 | 00:56:32 --> 00:56:38 | dealing good hands, stacking the deck up for his buddy Matt. And Matt realized |
| 607 | 00:56:38 --> 00:56:42 | what was going on. He was like, Listen, I want to play for real. I don't want to |
| 608 | 00:56:42 --> 00:56:48 | get caught doing this and they end up getting caught. And that's another |
| 609 | 00:56:48 --> 00:56:55 | discussion. It's another discussion for another day. Just just know that I |
| 610 | 00:56:55 --> 00:57:00 | really enjoy these lies, but they're almost problematic for me because I have |
| 611 | 00:57:00 --> 00:57:04 | so many things I would love to talk I really should have a podcast. I mean, I |
| 612 | 00:57:04 --> 00:57:09 | really should have one, because I could never run out of things to talk about, |
| 613 | 00:57:09 --> 00:57:19 | ever, literally, never, ever, ever. But when we're looking at the wicks, okay, I |
| 614 | 00:57:19 --> 00:57:24 | want to see it go up and fail, okay, or stop, give me that little signature. |
| 615 | 00:57:24 --> 00:57:27 | It's like me tipping my hand to another player at the table and showing them my |
| 616 | 00:57:27 --> 00:57:31 | cards. Okay? Well, that's what the algorithm is doing for me and for |
| 617 | 00:57:31 --> 00:57:35 | anybody that trades like this. And before I stepped out and started talking |
| 618 | 00:57:35 --> 00:57:38 | like this and revealing this, this language, and start seeing it this way |
| 619 | 00:57:38 --> 00:57:42 | and looking for it, nobody believed that there was an algorithm to control price |
| 620 | 00:57:42 --> 00:57:49 | like this. And there's always been a group of people that you're not hearing |
| 621 | 00:57:49 --> 00:57:54 | about. They don't write books, they don't go on CBC, and they do the very |
| 622 | 00:57:54 --> 00:57:58 | things I'm telling you, how to trade an engaged price. They do that, and they do |
| 623 | 00:57:58 --> 00:58:04 | it on a very large scale, all day long, all time frames, okay? And they also |
| 624 | 00:58:04 --> 00:58:08 | have algorithms that are keying up off of these very things, so they're not |
| 625 | 00:58:08 --> 00:58:14 | sitting there looking for these things, okay? Quote, unquote, Smart Money |
| 626 | 00:58:14 --> 00:58:18 | traders, algorithmic traders. They understand the things I'm I'm showing |
| 627 | 00:58:18 --> 00:58:25 | you visually, but these are the closest things that I can teach you to see the |
| 628 | 00:58:25 --> 00:58:29 | phenomenon that's going on at that moment. There's other things that I'm |
| 629 | 00:58:29 --> 00:58:33 | I'm not a I'm not in the position, but split that way, I'm not going to teach |
| 630 | 00:58:33 --> 00:58:36 | it, and I'm gonna give a shit. Who comes to my house and says, You're gonna, I'm |
| 631 | 00:58:36 --> 00:58:41 | not gonna do shit. Okay, I'm not telling you shit. You want my technology. Fuck |
| 632 | 00:58:41 --> 00:58:48 | you. You can't have it, but you can have these things. You can have that tell me |
| 633 | 00:58:48 --> 00:58:55 | I can't Well, I'll make more of me. Okay. So if you have these little hints, |
| 634 | 00:58:55 --> 00:59:01 | these little billboard signs flash and say, I am not going any higher. And |
| 635 | 00:59:01 --> 00:59:08 | here's proof to that, that you can trust. See that's a real indicator if |
| 636 | 00:59:08 --> 00:59:13 | you start applying things that are mathematically calculating old data for |
| 637 | 00:59:13 --> 00:59:17 | the purpose of overball, oversold divergence, trend following, moving |
| 638 | 00:59:17 --> 00:59:24 | averages, ratios, Fibonacci ratios, if you're doing any of that stuff, listen |
| 639 | 00:59:24 --> 00:59:27 | to me. And I mean this sincerely. I know there's a lot of people that don't like |
| 640 | 00:59:27 --> 00:59:30 | me that stand on that dumb, dumb shit. They sell courses, they sell software, |
| 641 | 00:59:30 --> 00:59:35 | they do all kinds of stuff. Okay, whether you believe them, whether you |
| 642 | 00:59:35 --> 00:59:40 | believe me or not, I'm just gonna say this is the truth. Price literally |
| 643 | 00:59:40 --> 00:59:47 | doesn't give a fuck about any of that. It doesn't. It does not mean that that's |
| 644 | 00:59:47 --> 00:59:52 | what causes price to go up and down. Absolutely not. It doesn't. It doesn't |
| 645 | 00:59:52 --> 01:00:00 | do that. But what price does refer to is time, if it's. The right time for price |
| 646 | 01:00:00 --> 01:00:07 | to move, it will move. If it's not right time, it ain't going to move. It'll just |
| 647 | 01:00:07 --> 01:00:11 | gyrate and fluctuate in a predetermined range that is mathematically calculated |
| 648 | 01:00:11 --> 01:00:15 | by the algorithm. I'm only going to go this high. I'm only going to go this low |
| 649 | 01:00:15 --> 01:00:18 | for this amount of time, and then I'll go just a little bit of that highest |
| 650 | 01:00:18 --> 01:00:20 | high in the last range, and I'll go down below the lowest low in the last range, |
| 651 | 01:00:20 --> 01:00:23 | and I'll go right back in the middle of that range. And that range until it's |
| 652 | 01:00:23 --> 01:00:32 | time to start spooling that session starts and session endings during the |
| 653 | 01:00:32 --> 01:00:37 | macro periods, at 20 minute intervals, at top of every hour, all these things |
| 654 | 01:00:37 --> 01:00:41 | start to come together like a like a puzzle, okay? And when I was on baby |
| 655 | 01:00:41 --> 01:00:46 | pips, I was testing, laying out bread crumbs and see, out of all the people |
| 656 | 01:00:46 --> 01:00:51 | that come here, I want to see who can pick it up, and not one person could. |
| 657 | 01:00:52 --> 01:00:57 | And then I did a mentorship. I'm gonna see, can they, can they jump and do |
| 658 | 01:00:57 --> 01:01:02 | these quantum leaps like I was, I was getting these huge, like downloads of |
| 659 | 01:01:03 --> 01:01:06 | understanding and seeing, wow, this. Yeah, you can really see some of these |
| 660 | 01:01:06 --> 01:01:11 | things in not a lot of it, but you can see enough in price action where the |
| 661 | 01:01:12 --> 01:01:17 | concepts, the theology behind when price and why price should do anything. |
| 662 | 01:01:18 --> 01:01:25 | There's certain times when price doesn't hide it. And that was the fascinating |
| 663 | 01:01:25 --> 01:01:29 | thing for me, because I, I've, I've done it for a long time, but it was me trying |
| 664 | 01:01:29 --> 01:01:34 | to find a way where I could talk about it, and I'm talking about these little |
| 665 | 01:01:34 --> 01:01:39 | things like this. That's not really what's going on in price, but visually |
| 666 | 01:01:39 --> 01:01:42 | it's occurring at the same time the algorithm is doing what it's doing that |
| 667 | 01:01:42 --> 01:01:46 | I can't talk about, and that's the part that some of you get pissed off about. |
| 668 | 01:01:46 --> 01:01:47 | You're like, Oh, you're hiding stuff. |
| 669 | 01:01:48 --> 01:01:49 | You're fucking right. I'm |
| 670 | 01:01:49 --> 01:01:56 | hiding something. You're right. I am, absolutely I am. You would too. You |
| 671 | 01:01:56 --> 01:01:59 | would too. You wouldn't even be teaching this part of it. You keep it to |
| 672 | 01:01:59 --> 01:02:05 | yourself, but I have an obligation. I have something I have to fulfill, and I |
| 673 | 01:02:05 --> 01:02:12 | have a bone to pick, really. So this is my way of doing it, and I have been |
| 674 | 01:02:12 --> 01:02:18 | successful in transferring this information with this language. It's |
| 675 | 01:02:18 --> 01:02:25 | resonated with a large number of people all around the world, and my daughter |
| 676 | 01:02:25 --> 01:02:28 | actually sent me something. I just want to tell something because I was kind of |
| 677 | 01:02:28 --> 01:02:34 | interested by it last night, or say, evening, rather, right after the markets |
| 678 | 01:02:34 --> 01:02:39 | closed, I got text messages from my daughter, and she goes, Do you see this |
| 679 | 01:02:39 --> 01:02:44 | person? Do you know this person or not, and she sent me like a profile of |
| 680 | 01:02:44 --> 01:02:49 | someone on Instagram. I'm not on Instagram, so she has to send me |
| 681 | 01:02:49 --> 01:02:52 | screenshots to see it, because I don't know how to I can't access anybody's |
| 682 | 01:02:52 --> 01:02:56 | account. I'm not on Instagram, I'm not on Facebook, I'm not on Discord. I don't |
| 683 | 01:02:56 --> 01:03:00 | have any anything to do with that stuff. So if anybody's using my name, it's not |
| 684 | 01:03:00 --> 01:03:06 | me, but she asked me, Do you know this person? Because they had my logo in |
| 685 | 01:03:06 --> 01:03:10 | their in their profile, which a lot of people, a lot of people have that it's |
| 686 | 01:03:10 --> 01:03:13 | like a, like, a brotherhood symbol, like and I have people, have students all |
| 687 | 01:03:13 --> 01:03:16 | around the world. They're getting it tattooed on them. Please don't do that. |
| 688 | 01:03:17 --> 01:03:20 | I don't know what you're thinking, but I get it. I understand what you're doing. |
| 689 | 01:03:20 --> 01:03:24 | But you know, the Bible says take no mark upon your skin, and that, that's |
| 690 | 01:03:24 --> 01:03:27 | exactly what that means. Don't do that very thing. You don't have you don't I |
| 691 | 01:03:27 --> 01:03:31 | don't have a mark. I'm not forcing people to take a mark. And my logo |
| 692 | 01:03:31 --> 01:03:34 | certainly isn't the mark of the beast, either. But there's individuals out |
| 693 | 01:03:34 --> 01:03:38 | there that take my logo and they put it in their profile and use it as their |
| 694 | 01:03:38 --> 01:03:45 | avatar. And the person she was asking me about, I said, Well, I know of this |
| 695 | 01:03:45 --> 01:03:51 | person. They're a student of mine, but what? What spurred that on? She goes, |
| 696 | 01:03:51 --> 01:03:56 | Well, I'm looking at the new bachelor. Apparently, there's a show called The |
| 697 | 01:03:56 --> 01:04:01 | Bachelor. Something something bachelor, okay? And because she's a single woman, |
| 698 | 01:04:02 --> 01:04:08 | she likes those kind of shows, and apparently the new Bachelor is a day |
| 699 | 01:04:08 --> 01:04:15 | trader. And Ellis, I don't know if that's the last thing or if it's the |
| 700 | 01:04:15 --> 01:04:19 | first thing, Ellis something. Well anyway, she looked at his followers and |
| 701 | 01:04:19 --> 01:04:22 | who he was following, and he followed, he's actually following something or |
| 702 | 01:04:22 --> 01:04:31 | someone that's one of my students, and it's something lab scalping lab, scalp |
| 703 | 01:04:31 --> 01:04:37 | lab scalping lab, or something that effect. And they have my, my logo as |
| 704 | 01:04:37 --> 01:04:42 | their their avatar, and they're on Instagram. And this, apparently, this |
| 705 | 01:04:42 --> 01:04:47 | new Bachelor on this TV show that does something around being a bachelor. They, |
| 706 | 01:04:47 --> 01:04:50 | uh, they're a day trader, and his following, he's following this |
| 707 | 01:04:50 --> 01:04:54 | particular person. And the question was brought up on my daughter. She goes, Do |
| 708 | 01:04:54 --> 01:05:01 | you know this person? And I was like, I don't know them. And. I don't off top my |
| 709 | 01:05:01 --> 01:05:05 | head. I don't know who the person that's going to be, the bastard is, but he's a, |
| 710 | 01:05:05 --> 01:05:09 | he's a young guy. And it was a picture of it, so I couldn't really make out who |
| 711 | 01:05:09 --> 01:05:16 | it was, because I don't see so much by zooming in. But if you're, if you're, if |
| 712 | 01:05:16 --> 01:05:19 | you know more about it, like, if, especially if you're, like in my private |
| 713 | 01:05:19 --> 01:05:23 | mentorship, if you know, if, if you know anything about it, just, you know, send |
| 714 | 01:05:23 --> 01:05:26 | me, you know, a message about it, because I'm intrigued by it, because, |
| 715 | 01:05:26 --> 01:05:32 | you know, I've heard my name talked out of Andrew Tate's brother's mouth, like |
| 716 | 01:05:32 --> 01:05:36 | I'm all over the place. I'm Mr. Worldwide. But I said that to my |
| 717 | 01:05:36 --> 01:05:41 | daughter last night. She was laughing, but it's funny. It's really funny to see |
| 718 | 01:05:41 --> 01:05:46 | how far this has reached out to like all these individuals around the world are |
| 719 | 01:05:46 --> 01:05:51 | familiar with me and either with me or they are familiar with what I've |
| 720 | 01:05:51 --> 01:05:54 | introduced to the community, because other people are using it and |
| 721 | 01:05:54 --> 01:05:57 | implementing it, and they they have a filing of their own, which is fine. I |
| 722 | 01:05:57 --> 01:06:00 | got no problem with that. I just don't like it when people try to pretend they |
| 723 | 01:06:00 --> 01:06:04 | know how to do certain things that I've never fully taught, and they try to sell |
| 724 | 01:06:04 --> 01:06:08 | mentorships taking people on. That's, that's fraud, okay, because you don't |
| 725 | 01:06:08 --> 01:06:12 | know what I know, but if you've gone through mentorship, you know what I've |
| 726 | 01:06:12 --> 01:06:16 | taught mentorship. But now that's, that's for free on YouTube now too. So, |
| 727 | 01:06:17 --> 01:06:26 | but the i digress the I gotta tell you, I love, I love. Why shaming? Because it |
| 728 | 01:06:26 --> 01:06:32 | gives me an outlet. Okay? It really gives me an outlet. So I can say what's |
| 729 | 01:06:32 --> 01:06:36 | on my mind when I want to say it, but unfortunately, it's hard to follow me if |
| 730 | 01:06:36 --> 01:06:42 | you're here just for for studious purposes. So I understand and I I can |
| 731 | 01:06:45 --> 01:06:48 | appreciate your frustration if you're someone like that, but just know that I |
| 732 | 01:06:48 --> 01:06:54 | can't not be me okay, and people have asked me to change for years, and I'm |
| 733 | 01:06:54 --> 01:06:59 | not going to do it. I i can do as much as I can to try to do what I want to do |
| 734 | 01:06:59 --> 01:07:05 | and still meet the expectations or whatever I have in mind to do, but I |
| 735 | 01:07:05 --> 01:07:09 | also have to be me, and no one's going to change that. And the way I deliver |
| 736 | 01:07:09 --> 01:07:13 | the information is the way I want to deliver it, and I have to be happy with |
| 737 | 01:07:13 --> 01:07:16 | the way I do it, or I won't do it at all. So it takes a great deal of |
| 738 | 01:07:16 --> 01:07:22 | filtering, if you're here just for the nuggets, okay, and when it's live |
| 739 | 01:07:22 --> 01:07:26 | stream, like this, like it was on Twitter spaces, it's the good stuff |
| 740 | 01:07:26 --> 01:07:33 | being tucked in. And sometimes that's intentional, like today, it isn't |
| 741 | 01:07:33 --> 01:07:37 | intentional. It's just me being organic, because I'm finally relaxing about the |
| 742 | 01:07:37 --> 01:07:42 | frustration I had with trying to get OBS to start streaming. It pissed me off, |
| 743 | 01:07:42 --> 01:07:45 | like I was ready to throw this fucking laptop to the world, like I was getting |
| 744 | 01:07:45 --> 01:07:50 | angry. I was getting so mad. But it is what it is. But I want you to think |
| 745 | 01:07:50 --> 01:07:57 | about wicks, okay, and how every swing high and every swing low that has a |
| 746 | 01:07:57 --> 01:08:04 | wick, the information is useful if you start measuring them, finding out where |
| 747 | 01:08:04 --> 01:08:09 | the midpoint is of the width the highest high and the lowest low. And if we start |
| 748 | 01:08:09 --> 01:08:14 | doing that, we can start forecasting things in price action that would |
| 749 | 01:08:14 --> 01:08:19 | otherwise be un it's unknown to other traders. Okay, and I'm going to |
| 750 | 01:08:19 --> 01:08:23 | introduce some of the principles today. It's meant for you to go into your |
| 751 | 01:08:23 --> 01:08:27 | charts and explore it, study it. It's a fascinating subject matter. I spent |
| 752 | 01:08:27 --> 01:08:34 | years looking at these things, and finally, after six years, because I |
| 753 | 01:08:34 --> 01:08:39 | figured out in like less than three years, like two, two years, and like |
| 754 | 01:08:39 --> 01:08:43 | nine, nine months, or something like that. I had everything, exactly what I |
| 755 | 01:08:43 --> 01:08:48 | wanted, but because I have to take things apart and tinker with them, that |
| 756 | 01:08:48 --> 01:08:52 | was I was that kind of boy growing up. I had to Stretch Armstrong toy. I had to |
| 757 | 01:08:52 --> 01:08:56 | find out why it kept going back to its normal size. I had to figure out what |
| 758 | 01:08:56 --> 01:09:00 | was inside of it, so I cut it open, and it's like this little gel stuff in it. |
| 759 | 01:09:00 --> 01:09:06 | And I needed to know why my remote control cars worked and what was inside |
| 760 | 01:09:06 --> 01:09:10 | the thing behind where the battery panel was. I had to take things apart to see |
| 761 | 01:09:10 --> 01:09:13 | what they did, and it mattered not to me if I could put them back together. I |
| 762 | 01:09:13 --> 01:09:19 | needed to know what made them work. And from someone's perspective that doesn't |
| 763 | 01:09:19 --> 01:09:24 | appreciate that inquisitive nature in a human mind, they may see it though this |
| 764 | 01:09:24 --> 01:09:28 | kid's a brat, he's a destructive person, looking he's breaking things up. But |
| 765 | 01:09:28 --> 01:09:32 | that was the fuel for me to be who I am today, because every everything that I |
| 766 | 01:09:32 --> 01:09:36 | get involved with, I have to understand why it does what it does, and how it |
| 767 | 01:09:36 --> 01:09:41 | does it, and if I can't ascertain what that is, if I can't get a grasp on it, |
| 768 | 01:09:41 --> 01:09:49 | I'm not interested. It can't hold my attention. So I have a demand on |
| 769 | 01:09:49 --> 01:09:53 | anything that holds my attention, that it has to do something for me to hold my |
| 770 | 01:09:53 --> 01:09:59 | attention, or I'm not. I'm not interested. And in trading and using |
| 771 | 01:09:59 --> 01:10:05 | these concepts. Said not exploring price action, I have found that, and I had |
| 772 | 01:10:05 --> 01:10:11 | lots of students come through me and the characteristics of impatience, and I |
| 773 | 01:10:11 --> 01:10:17 | need you to start saying less and just teach it and stop talking so much. |
| 774 | 01:10:19 --> 01:10:22 | You're never going to learn from me, then you're probably not going to do |
| 775 | 01:10:22 --> 01:10:26 | well with anybody else, because what you're trying to do is condense. You |
| 776 | 01:10:26 --> 01:10:34 | wanted to have a distilled version of all this information, and when you |
| 777 | 01:10:34 --> 01:10:37 | really take a step back, there's no advantage of distilling any of it, |
| 778 | 01:10:37 --> 01:10:41 | because you have to have a complete perspective. Because they all, they all |
| 779 | 01:10:41 --> 01:10:49 | link together as one symbiotic unit. It's not one thing and stands by itself |
| 780 | 01:10:49 --> 01:10:52 | a wick. And the details I'm going to teach you about this that leads to |
| 781 | 01:10:52 --> 01:10:56 | understanding turtle soup. You thought I forgot about that. It's just the |
| 782 | 01:10:56 --> 01:11:02 | preamble here, the idea of anticipating turning points in the marketplace, which |
| 783 | 01:11:02 --> 01:11:09 | is what a turtle soup is. It's a run on liquidity, but it's not always running |
| 784 | 01:11:09 --> 01:11:16 | above an old high. It's not always running below an old low. So when I say |
| 785 | 01:11:16 --> 01:11:22 | turtle soup, it was me nodding, because I like to name those cute of what I saw |
| 786 | 01:11:22 --> 01:11:27 | and read about in the street smarts books by Larry, Larry Connor and Linda |
| 787 | 01:11:27 --> 01:11:31 | rash. And I said this before, and I'll say it again, because I mentioned the |
| 788 | 01:11:31 --> 01:11:35 | book again. I get nothing from it. I'm sure she probably knows about me only |
| 789 | 01:11:35 --> 01:11:36 | because |
| 790 | 01:11:38 --> 01:11:44 | I have commented to her. I think twice, when I was on Twitter and she was tagged |
| 791 | 01:11:44 --> 01:11:50 | in a response, and I'm sure she looked at me and I was who I am, and I'm sure |
| 792 | 01:11:50 --> 01:11:55 | I'm not her cup of tea, and that's fun, but I think her book with Larry was a |
| 793 | 01:11:55 --> 01:11:59 | good book. It's expensive. Yes, would I still pay that price if I hadn't bought |
| 794 | 01:11:59 --> 01:12:04 | it at that same time in 1995 Yes, I paid $175 for it. I don't know what it's |
| 795 | 01:12:04 --> 01:12:08 | selling for today. Unfortunately, it's been copied and put all over the |
| 796 | 01:12:08 --> 01:12:12 | internet. You can get it for PDF and for free, don't? I don't want you to do |
| 797 | 01:12:12 --> 01:12:15 | that. If the authors are going to take the time to put the information together |
| 798 | 01:12:15 --> 01:12:20 | like that, regardless of what they sell it for, you shouldn't. You shouldn't |
| 799 | 01:12:20 --> 01:12:25 | take the information and circumvent the payment for their their information, |
| 800 | 01:12:25 --> 01:12:29 | their experience that they collected to put it out into other people's hands. |
| 801 | 01:12:29 --> 01:12:35 | There's a lot of things in that book that I don't like, but it did help me |
| 802 | 01:12:36 --> 01:12:42 | understand stop runs. It. It helped me formulate a visual representation, |
| 803 | 01:12:42 --> 01:12:46 | because that was the first introduction to it. Because, remember, my original |
| 804 | 01:12:46 --> 01:12:49 | mentor was Larry Williams, and Larry Williams doesn't do any of this shit. He |
| 805 | 01:12:49 --> 01:12:52 | doesn't use nothing. He doesn't use any of this stuff that I'm talking about |
| 806 | 01:12:52 --> 01:12:56 | here, everything in my mentorship, all that stuff, technical, fair value gaps, |
| 807 | 01:12:56 --> 01:13:00 | institutional order, flow, inversion, fair value gaps, breakers. That's not |
| 808 | 01:13:00 --> 01:13:06 | him. Okay, I had some dickhead write a book on Amazon and try to say that my |
| 809 | 01:13:06 --> 01:13:11 | stuff was Chris Laurie stuff, Larry Williams stuff, Sam Sidon stuff, supply |
| 810 | 01:13:11 --> 01:13:14 | and demand and all of that is the biggest fucking lions a joke. And that's |
| 811 | 01:13:14 --> 01:13:18 | why I invited everybody with a I purchased his poor shit book just so I |
| 812 | 01:13:18 --> 01:13:23 | could leave a verified purchase review saying this is all nonsense. You can go |
| 813 | 01:13:23 --> 01:13:26 | to our YouTube channel and you see everything that this fucking clown wrote |
| 814 | 01:13:26 --> 01:13:30 | about is my information, and none of these other people had anything to do |
| 815 | 01:13:30 --> 01:13:33 | with it. And you asked them directly, and that's why I went out and caused |
| 816 | 01:13:33 --> 01:13:37 | Chris Laurie to answer me publicly on Twitter. I said, Listen, I'm tired of |
| 817 | 01:13:37 --> 01:13:42 | these people saying that I've copied you. We're going to court if you don't |
| 818 | 01:13:42 --> 01:13:48 | do this publicly, because I didn't take shit from you. Do you see your material |
| 819 | 01:13:48 --> 01:13:51 | in my concepts, in my lectures, in my teachings, yes or no in hem the hall? I |
| 820 | 01:13:51 --> 01:13:54 | said, Listen, you got 30 fucking minutes. And I got the emails to prove |
| 821 | 01:13:54 --> 01:13:58 | all that you got 30 minutes to come out on Twitter and respond publicly. And he |
| 822 | 01:13:58 --> 01:14:02 | comes out and says no, and he does all this other extra bullshit trying to save |
| 823 | 01:14:02 --> 01:14:06 | face. But there's your answer, everybody. I don't teach Chris Laurie |
| 824 | 01:14:06 --> 01:14:10 | bullshit. Okay, I don't, I don't teach Chris Laurie stuff. I made the mistake |
| 825 | 01:14:10 --> 01:14:15 | of giving him a nod and sending him people. And I found out through other |
| 826 | 01:14:15 --> 01:14:20 | people sending me email saying he was talking shit about, listen, you bite the |
| 827 | 01:14:20 --> 01:14:25 | hand that fucking feeds you to help set you up. Go fuck yourself, pal. I don't |
| 828 | 01:14:25 --> 01:14:29 | need anybody else to help me. I don't need that. I got one person in my |
| 829 | 01:14:29 --> 01:14:36 | corner, and he ain't on Earth. So it's just a one it's a one man army here. I |
| 830 | 01:14:36 --> 01:14:39 | don't need allies. I don't need people supporting me. I don't need worshipers. |
| 831 | 01:14:39 --> 01:14:43 | I don't need cult members. I don't need students. I don't need it. I don't need |
| 832 | 01:14:43 --> 01:14:47 | to do any of this stuff. I enjoy this stuff. I enjoy sharing it, and it just |
| 833 | 01:14:47 --> 01:14:51 | pisses me off. And I see other people lie and they discredit me and say, Oh, |
| 834 | 01:14:51 --> 01:14:54 | well, you didn't do this and you said this because it's somebody else's stuff |
| 835 | 01:14:54 --> 01:14:58 | that's over here. It's horseshit. You got $5 million I'm gonna remind you all |
| 836 | 01:14:58 --> 01:15:03 | $5 million Is you come forward and you show where any of the stuff I'm teaching |
| 837 | 01:15:03 --> 01:15:14 | is found anywhere prior to me. And a lot of this shit was codified in 1996 prior |
| 838 | 01:15:14 --> 01:15:18 | to that, it was conceptually being discovered. I was figuring out certain |
| 839 | 01:15:18 --> 01:15:26 | things, but I put it in a format where it is linked to me, 1996 and all sudden, |
| 840 | 01:15:26 --> 01:15:29 | you hear about stories about as a market maker that was flying on an airplane, |
| 841 | 01:15:29 --> 01:15:33 | and I met this guy. And then all sudden, that's urban legend, but you're hearing |
| 842 | 01:15:33 --> 01:15:39 | it right from that person that that guy's talking about. Hello. Think about |
| 843 | 01:15:39 --> 01:15:44 | it, folks. I've been around the block for a long, long time, multiple times. |
| 844 | 01:15:44 --> 01:15:48 | I've had more personalities online than you realize. Inner Circle triggers is |
| 845 | 01:15:48 --> 01:15:58 | the longest one. A lot of big names have their hand in my cookie jar. Let's put |
| 846 | 01:15:58 --> 01:16:04 | it that way, my hands not in theirs. So let's talk about the wicks. Okay, I had |
| 847 | 01:16:04 --> 01:16:09 | fun. So let's get into the nitty gritty with it. If we refer back to this one |
| 848 | 01:16:09 --> 01:16:14 | here, as I mentioned, if price is ever reaching up, okay, if price is ever |
| 849 | 01:16:14 --> 01:16:18 | below it, and you have a reason to suspect that it may go up for the sake |
| 850 | 01:16:18 --> 01:16:23 | of retracement, for the sake of a long trade, and it is likely to continuously |
| 851 | 01:16:23 --> 01:16:27 | move higher. You have to contend with the information that's being presented |
| 852 | 01:16:29 --> 01:16:35 | inside of the wick. Okay, inside of that wick, what specific information, if |
| 853 | 01:16:35 --> 01:16:41 | you're below it, it's going to come up into that midpoint. The midpoint is |
| 854 | 01:16:41 --> 01:16:46 | consequent encroachment. Why is it not mean threshold? Because it is a gap. |
| 855 | 01:16:46 --> 01:16:53 | Gaps midpoints are always consequential to its return back into that range of |
| 856 | 01:16:53 --> 01:16:59 | that gap. So consequent encroachment. It's encroaching on the mid part of that |
| 857 | 01:16:59 --> 01:17:07 | gap, or inefficiency. So because I when I look at a wick, I treat it as a gap, |
| 858 | 01:17:08 --> 01:17:13 | even though it moves in one single candle, passing from the open of that |
| 859 | 01:17:13 --> 01:17:16 | candle down to the low I don't care how long it takes doing it. That's not an |
| 860 | 01:17:16 --> 01:17:21 | important factor. The visual representation of that is enough for me, |
| 861 | 01:17:21 --> 01:17:27 | then I go right in and I measure it. If it's a long range wick, something like |
| 862 | 01:17:27 --> 01:17:30 | this one over here, I'm going to get a very specific calculation, and I want to |
| 863 | 01:17:30 --> 01:17:34 | know the very number. But if it's short like this, I can eyeball that and say, |
| 864 | 01:17:34 --> 01:17:39 | Okay, well, we're in close proximity to the 6pm opening price. We're also |
| 865 | 01:17:40 --> 01:17:44 | approaching the consequence of this gap, which is this candle is low and this |
| 866 | 01:17:44 --> 01:17:49 | candle is high, so half of that Okay, so here's a here's a convergence of three |
| 867 | 01:17:49 --> 01:17:54 | things there that build on this is a good idea to anticipate lower prices. |
| 868 | 01:17:54 --> 01:17:58 | But you already knew lower prices were in order back here, when I finally got |
| 869 | 01:17:58 --> 01:18:02 | the stream going, you knew yesterday that this is where the NASDAQ could |
| 870 | 01:18:02 --> 01:18:06 | potentially reach up into if it was going to continue to be higher. Look at |
| 871 | 01:18:06 --> 01:18:14 | the turn there. What is this candle doing? Right there? This one. What's |
| 872 | 01:18:14 --> 01:18:22 | this candle right here? What is it doing? It's trading below that short |
| 873 | 01:18:22 --> 01:18:28 | term low? Yes, absolutely it is. But what else is it doing? It's validating |
| 874 | 01:18:28 --> 01:18:34 | this candle, this candle as an order block. What kind of order block? It's a |
| 875 | 01:18:34 --> 01:18:42 | bearish order. Well, so once we get below and close here, we have a shift in |
| 876 | 01:18:42 --> 01:18:49 | market structure, but before we do that, that order block is validated. That's an |
| 877 | 01:18:49 --> 01:18:53 | that's the change in a state of delivery. What does that mean? What does |
| 878 | 01:18:53 --> 01:18:58 | that mean when I say it's a change in the state of delivery, this candle |
| 879 | 01:18:58 --> 01:19:03 | opened and there was buy side delivery. That means the market's moving higher. |
| 880 | 01:19:03 --> 01:19:08 | It keeps booking and offering higher prices. That is buy side delivery. It's |
| 881 | 01:19:08 --> 01:19:13 | going up to go into that inefficiency I told you yesterday that would be an |
| 882 | 01:19:13 --> 01:19:18 | upside objective. If it continued moving higher. It's also taking out this high |
| 883 | 01:19:18 --> 01:19:23 | here, this high here, this high here, and the high formed at the 830 news |
| 884 | 01:19:23 --> 01:19:28 | driver and release that it created there. So it went up there and kept that |
| 885 | 01:19:28 --> 01:19:36 | gap in play, that old new week opening gap on july 28 of 2024 some old |
| 886 | 01:19:36 --> 01:19:41 | reference point that everybody knows about these gaps. ICT, but nobody was |
| 887 | 01:19:41 --> 01:19:47 | doing this with them. Nobody was extending them in the future. It was |
| 888 | 01:19:47 --> 01:19:51 | filled, alright, that's done. Cast it out now. It's no longer valid. It's one |
| 889 | 01:19:51 --> 01:19:58 | and done over. No, it's not. I've had so much fun over the years watching people |
| 890 | 01:19:58 --> 01:20:04 | literally you. Uh, talk about price action, and it's staring right at them |
| 891 | 01:20:04 --> 01:20:09 | every single day, every single week, for weeks at a time, and it's completely |
| 892 | 01:20:09 --> 01:20:13 | they're oblivious to it, and they're taking trades that would otherwise be |
| 893 | 01:20:13 --> 01:20:18 | contrary to what that implies. They aren't going to go long. We broke out |
| 894 | 01:20:18 --> 01:20:21 | above here. So it's probably going to keep going because they're a momentum |
| 895 | 01:20:21 --> 01:20:24 | trader, and they don't know this info. And they don't know this information. |
| 896 | 01:20:24 --> 01:20:27 | They don't have this information that you were given yesterday. Do you see a |
| 897 | 01:20:27 --> 01:20:31 | repeating phenomenon like I'm always able to tell you with these concepts |
| 898 | 01:20:31 --> 01:20:36 | what is the most salient, and then the market behaves around them as a manner |
| 899 | 01:20:36 --> 01:20:44 | of proving the concept, the logic and the pre determined aspects, it's before |
| 900 | 01:20:44 --> 01:20:48 | it happens, not after the fact. It's before it happens. Because if these |
| 901 | 01:20:48 --> 01:20:53 | things don't have a logic that I'm able to tap into, and it never is deviating |
| 902 | 01:20:53 --> 01:20:56 | or changing or morphing into something else, that means I'm confident. That |
| 903 | 01:20:56 --> 01:21:00 | means I'm to a lot of people's perspective, I'm arrogant and conceited |
| 904 | 01:21:00 --> 01:21:07 | and narcissistic, okay? Because I'm absolutely confident that this is going |
| 905 | 01:21:07 --> 01:21:11 | to continuously keep working. That's why when I talk, I don't sound like I'm |
| 906 | 01:21:11 --> 01:21:16 | second guessing myself. I speak with authority. That's why that tone is |
| 907 | 01:21:16 --> 01:21:22 | always there, because it's mine. It's mine, okay? And I'm sharing something |
| 908 | 01:21:22 --> 01:21:29 | that you wouldn't otherwise know about. But if we look at these elements, and |
| 909 | 01:21:29 --> 01:21:34 | you introduce the idea of swing points, if you're trying to capture a reversal |
| 910 | 01:21:34 --> 01:21:35 | pattern, okay, |
| 911 | 01:21:37 --> 01:21:44 | there's two forms of reversal I want you to think about, okay, there are |
| 912 | 01:21:44 --> 01:21:53 | reversals. For the sake of changing a buy or sell program into an opposing buy |
| 913 | 01:21:53 --> 01:22:00 | or sell, meaning this, we have, the market's been going higher prior, you |
| 914 | 01:22:00 --> 01:22:09 | know, prior to day 30, we had this, all this consolidation overnight, all this |
| 915 | 01:22:09 --> 01:22:16 | meandering around. We had to stop hunt, rally up, and then go to where we were |
| 916 | 01:22:16 --> 01:22:22 | talking about yesterday. All of this is higher than where we were trading |
| 917 | 01:22:22 --> 01:22:28 | yesterday at the beginning of the stream, 915 or so yesterday, Eastern |
| 918 | 01:22:28 --> 01:22:33 | Time. So it's been going higher. And it went to some random level that was given |
| 919 | 01:22:33 --> 01:22:40 | to you in advance yesterday. And then it behaves like this, breaks down. So we've |
| 920 | 01:22:40 --> 01:22:44 | been a part of a buy program. It's been going higher. We had to wait for the |
| 921 | 01:22:44 --> 01:22:48 | news driver this morning, and it continued going into the upper, higher |
| 922 | 01:22:48 --> 01:22:52 | premium levels that we talked about yesterday. Towards the end of the |
| 923 | 01:22:52 --> 01:22:55 | stream, I gave you, okay, what do we do with now where it's at? And I walked you |
| 924 | 01:22:55 --> 01:22:59 | through certain aspects of where the price could go if it's going to remain |
| 925 | 01:22:59 --> 01:23:05 | going bullish. Here we have it. It trades up to it here, and then it folds |
| 926 | 01:23:05 --> 01:23:11 | and drops. Now, if I didn't teach the new week opening gap, if you didn't know |
| 927 | 01:23:11 --> 01:23:21 | anything about this concept, okay, this run above this high for a majority of |
| 928 | 01:23:21 --> 01:23:24 | you, you wouldn't, you wouldn't expect that type of reaction going there and |
| 929 | 01:23:24 --> 01:23:29 | then breaking down. You wouldn't expect it if I wouldn't have taught fair value |
| 930 | 01:23:29 --> 01:23:33 | gaps, you would have never even looked at this area here as a point of interest |
| 931 | 01:23:33 --> 01:23:40 | for you to study it, using it as a point of entry, going short. If I wouldn't |
| 932 | 01:23:40 --> 01:23:46 | have taught breakers, which is what this is, high, low, higher, high. That takes |
| 933 | 01:23:46 --> 01:23:50 | out liquidity. But notice it's taking out liquidity, and then it's going |
| 934 | 01:23:50 --> 01:23:55 | somewhere specific. It's not just going above. It's not, oh, this is an |
| 935 | 01:23:55 --> 01:23:59 | engulfing candle. It's a fu candle. That's an institutional candle. It is |
| 936 | 01:23:59 --> 01:24:07 | not an institutional candle. This is an order block. These three the I'm sorry, |
| 937 | 01:24:07 --> 01:24:12 | these two candles here, but it's that opening price that is the change in the |
| 938 | 01:24:12 --> 01:24:16 | state of delivery. So when I say it's a change in the state of delivery, Caleb, |
| 939 | 01:24:16 --> 01:24:21 | I'm telling you that what was in play prior to those candles formation, where |
| 940 | 01:24:21 --> 01:24:28 | was the market going up? So that means the market was in buy side, delivery. |
| 941 | 01:24:30 --> 01:24:36 | Suspend your disbelief for a moment. Okay, just give me the moment to speak |
| 942 | 01:24:36 --> 01:24:39 | in these terms. If you're one of those individuals that are in the audience |
| 943 | 01:24:40 --> 01:24:44 | listening and you think there's no there's no algorithm, bro, I work at so |
| 944 | 01:24:44 --> 01:24:47 | and so investment bank. There's no fucking algorithm. Okay, come out here |
| 945 | 01:24:47 --> 01:24:50 | and do this, what I'm doing, and I walk, I'll walk circles around your ass. You |
| 946 | 01:24:50 --> 01:24:54 | can use all the bullshit that Goldman Sachs and all the fucking city, all the |
| 947 | 01:24:54 --> 01:24:57 | all the shit that you use. You come out here live stream, and I'll tell you |
| 948 | 01:24:57 --> 01:25:01 | every fucking one minute candle, and I will call it all. Day long, and I'll run |
| 949 | 01:25:01 --> 01:25:06 | circles around your ass. The invitation is open. It's open if you want to come |
| 950 | 01:25:06 --> 01:25:09 | out here and get on blast Street, come out here and get on blast Street, |
| 951 | 01:25:09 --> 01:25:13 | because I will make your shit look like Mickey Mouse Romper Room nonsense. Okay. |
| 952 | 01:25:15 --> 01:25:19 | The change in a state of delivery, in this instance, is we move from buy side |
| 953 | 01:25:19 --> 01:25:23 | delivery. That means it's being offered higher prices, not because of buying |
| 954 | 01:25:23 --> 01:25:28 | pressure, not because an absence of selling pressure. Okay, it's |
| 955 | 01:25:28 --> 01:25:33 | algorithmically delivering to a fucking level I gave you yesterday. How's that |
| 956 | 01:25:33 --> 01:25:40 | possible? How is that possible? If the markets are random, if it's not rigged, |
| 957 | 01:25:41 --> 01:25:46 | if it's not rigged, I couldn't do this stuff. I couldn't see here on a live |
| 958 | 01:25:46 --> 01:25:50 | stream with the lowest latency and point out certain things in price action, and |
| 959 | 01:25:50 --> 01:25:56 | they deliver over and over and over again. If they weren't rigged, I |
| 960 | 01:25:56 --> 01:26:01 | couldn't do that. But because they are rigged, you should find solace in that |
| 961 | 01:26:01 --> 01:26:07 | you should fucking walk around with a hard on. You should be thankful that |
| 962 | 01:26:07 --> 01:26:12 | it's like this, because it's something that's going to repeat and it's going to |
| 963 | 01:26:12 --> 01:26:16 | give you a happy ending every fucking time you use it, because it's there for |
| 964 | 01:26:16 --> 01:26:22 | you to take it. It's there for you to take it. But prior to me revealing it, |
| 965 | 01:26:23 --> 01:26:34 | it's an unknown, it's something I had fun with, if they're my toys. So the |
| 966 | 01:26:34 --> 01:26:41 | change in a state of delivery at the opening price of an order block flips it |
| 967 | 01:26:42 --> 01:26:48 | from, in this case, from buy side delivery offering higher prices again. |
| 968 | 01:26:48 --> 01:26:51 | Don't think buying selling pressure, just think it's going to offer, offer, |
| 969 | 01:26:51 --> 01:26:54 | offer, offer, until it gets to that price level right there that you knew |
| 970 | 01:26:54 --> 01:27:03 | about yesterday. Then does it reject it? Yes, it does. Does it overshoot the |
| 971 | 01:27:03 --> 01:27:09 | opening price right there? It does. And I don't need, I don't need to see it |
| 972 | 01:27:09 --> 01:27:18 | close below it. Fu candle, fucking 20 words, but there's 20 year olds that |
| 973 | 01:27:18 --> 01:27:25 | they'll eat that shit up, though, won't they? Chairman, Chairman. |
| 974 | 01:27:25 --> 01:27:27 | They call themselves fucking chairman, |
| 975 | 01:27:27 --> 01:27:30 | sitting there, fucking chair. Boy, you know you're talking about the opening |
| 976 | 01:27:30 --> 01:27:33 | price is the change in a state delivery. In this case, soon as we get that cross |
| 977 | 01:27:33 --> 01:27:38 | over there, the algorithm changes its state of delivery from buy side delivery |
| 978 | 01:27:39 --> 01:27:40 | to sell side delivery. |
| 979 | 01:27:42 --> 01:27:42 | Oh, |
| 980 | 01:27:44 --> 01:27:49 | so that means it's going to refer to this price. It can color a little bit |
| 981 | 01:27:49 --> 01:27:56 | above it, up to how much Michael, how much of a gray area is this if it wants |
| 982 | 01:27:56 --> 01:28:02 | to trade back into that mean threshold, how do you properly outline that you |
| 983 | 01:28:02 --> 01:28:09 | take the opening price, opening price, man, I should be charging money for this |
| 984 | 01:28:09 --> 01:28:12 | shit if you like what you're learning today, if you're really having a good |
| 985 | 01:28:12 --> 01:28:15 | time hanging out with me and learning shit that nobody else on this planet is |
| 986 | 01:28:15 --> 01:28:19 | going to ever teach you, the stuff that really works that causes these markets |
| 987 | 01:28:19 --> 01:28:22 | to turn on a dime, on a time schedule that you can predict and expect and |
| 988 | 01:28:22 --> 01:28:26 | forecast weeks and months and years in advance. If you're having fun, I'd |
| 989 | 01:28:26 --> 01:28:29 | appreciate a thumbs up. You guys got real lazy the last few times you haven't |
| 990 | 01:28:29 --> 01:28:32 | been giving me thumbs up. Told you that's our currency here. That means |
| 991 | 01:28:32 --> 01:28:37 | that I'm hitting the sweet spots. I'm I'm touching your G spot. I'm tickling |
| 992 | 01:28:37 --> 01:28:40 | your ass with a feather. I'm giving you things that you've been wanting all this |
| 993 | 01:28:40 --> 01:28:45 | time I'm delivering it and I'm doing it over a live stream. What else could you |
| 994 | 01:28:45 --> 01:28:49 | want? What else do you want? You want to see? Any trade? |
| 995 | 01:28:49 --> 01:28:50 | You'll get it. |
| 996 | 01:28:51 --> 01:28:55 | It's coming. But I gotta give you the logic that we're using so that way you |
| 997 | 01:28:55 --> 01:28:58 | can see every time I'm doing, oh, it's the same shit he talked about. Yeah, |
| 998 | 01:28:59 --> 01:29:06 | it's the same stuff all the time, but this, this rally up in here. Okay, the |
| 999 | 01:29:06 --> 01:29:11 | body, body, the wicks are what? That's where the that's where the little like |
| 1000 | 01:29:11 --> 01:29:17 | the fuzzy areas, the the parts that like your child, that colors for you. They're |
| 1001 | 01:29:17 --> 01:29:20 | coloring the picture, and you see them color outside the lines a little bit. |
| 1002 | 01:29:20 --> 01:29:23 | Again, I mentioned the analogy last week. You're not going to scold your |
| 1003 | 01:29:23 --> 01:29:26 | child because they colored Outside the Lines. You're going to be like they |
| 1004 | 01:29:26 --> 01:29:29 | signed their little name probably misspelled something. You're going to go |
| 1005 | 01:29:29 --> 01:29:32 | to your office at work or you want to put on your refrigerator home, and |
| 1006 | 01:29:32 --> 01:29:37 | you're going to celebrate it. It's it's to you meaningful. Well, you're not |
| 1007 | 01:29:37 --> 01:29:41 | making a big deal about your child calling outside the lines. So I'm not |
| 1008 | 01:29:41 --> 01:29:44 | making a big deal about my algorithm coloring outside the lines by these |
| 1009 | 01:29:44 --> 01:29:49 | little, tiny, little nodes of internet price action, where it just goes just a |
| 1010 | 01:29:49 --> 01:29:55 | little bit outside, because they're all covid too. That's where the damage is |
| 1011 | 01:29:55 --> 01:29:59 | done. So I want you to focus on what the bodies are telling you inside those. |
| 1012 | 01:30:00 --> 01:30:07 | Bodies. You want to measure that because the mean threshold of the bodies in not |
| 1013 | 01:30:07 --> 01:30:11 | just single candle, but because they're consecutively up close candles, that |
| 1014 | 01:30:11 --> 01:30:14 | makes the bearish order block. It's not just the last up close candle before |
| 1015 | 01:30:14 --> 01:30:20 | down there. That was the trap. I knew people would go out there and start |
| 1016 | 01:30:20 --> 01:30:23 | using it and start pretending like they didn't learn it from me. It from me. Oh, |
| 1017 | 01:30:23 --> 01:30:28 | it's white cough. Oh, it's applying to man, bullshit. You have to take all of |
| 1018 | 01:30:28 --> 01:30:32 | the candles, because this is the state of delivery that was in play. Buy some |
| 1019 | 01:30:33 --> 01:30:39 | soon as we cross this opening price right there. That means the algorithm |
| 1020 | 01:30:39 --> 01:30:46 | has changed, switched script. Now it's offering sell side. That means it's |
| 1021 | 01:30:46 --> 01:30:51 | going to explore lower prices. Is it just going to randomly pull shit out of |
| 1022 | 01:30:51 --> 01:30:55 | its ass and say, Well, you know, let's just go down here. Let's go over here. |
| 1023 | 01:30:56 --> 01:30:59 | Or think about like this, and I'm obviously being facetious. I'm being a |
| 1024 | 01:30:59 --> 01:31:03 | dick right now, because I want you to understand the fallacy and believing |
| 1025 | 01:31:03 --> 01:31:06 | that there is no algorithm, that these things are just completely random buying |
| 1026 | 01:31:06 --> 01:31:11 | and selling pressure. Pray tell. How the fuck are we going from the opening price |
| 1027 | 01:31:11 --> 01:31:14 | here, and we're trading up into that little range here, but we're staying |
| 1028 | 01:31:14 --> 01:31:17 | below the midpoint, which is mean threshold we are not piercing, and going |
| 1029 | 01:31:17 --> 01:31:23 | above that fair value guy, we stopped one tick below it. So it's like |
| 1030 | 01:31:25 --> 01:31:32 | something other than everybody else's retail stuff. How is it that the |
| 1031 | 01:31:32 --> 01:31:36 | market's going to reach back through all of this price range, from that high down |
| 1032 | 01:31:36 --> 01:31:41 | to that low? Where is it going to gravitate to? And why is it the same |
| 1033 | 01:31:41 --> 01:31:44 | logic that I'm teaching and taught millions of people around the world, |
| 1034 | 01:31:45 --> 01:31:48 | they're able to use this information, and they're able to get funded account |
| 1035 | 01:31:48 --> 01:31:51 | payout. They're able to trade with real brokerage firms, not some horseshit real |
| 1036 | 01:31:51 --> 01:31:57 | brokerage firms, and getting withdrawals and paid out. They're paying taxes on |
| 1037 | 01:31:57 --> 01:32:04 | their trading wins. It's not Market Replay stuff. Okay, how is it that the |
| 1038 | 01:32:04 --> 01:32:11 | things I'm talking about and how the market will reach back to them? Why does |
| 1039 | 01:32:11 --> 01:32:16 | that occur more than anything else out there? And how is it that if, if there's |
| 1040 | 01:32:16 --> 01:32:21 | so many, if there's so many things in this industry that you can use to trade |
| 1041 | 01:32:21 --> 01:32:27 | off of. And yes, you can do that. You can trade on, you know, anything, |
| 1042 | 01:32:29 --> 01:32:33 | whether, like, I made fun of yesterday, the lunar cycles and whatnot, the |
| 1043 | 01:32:33 --> 01:32:38 | planetary alignment, all that stuff is nonsense. That's that doesn't make the |
| 1044 | 01:32:38 --> 01:32:44 | market go up or down. It doesn't do that. So if there are all these |
| 1045 | 01:32:44 --> 01:32:51 | different principles and disciplines of trading, how is it that the market |
| 1046 | 01:32:52 --> 01:33:01 | agrees to use the theology around Valli wave one particular day or harmonic |
| 1047 | 01:33:01 --> 01:33:09 | patterns this day, or Dow Theory this day, or supply and demand this day, or |
| 1048 | 01:33:09 --> 01:33:16 | white goth this day, because they all do not agree. Folks study them. I have I |
| 1049 | 01:33:16 --> 01:33:22 | listened to all that horse shit in my first three years, and every bit of it |
| 1050 | 01:33:22 --> 01:33:30 | is dog shit. It's dog shit, it's all dog squeeze. It absolutely has no bearing on |
| 1051 | 01:33:30 --> 01:33:33 | what price is going to do, but it feels good having your faith placed in |
| 1052 | 01:33:33 --> 01:33:37 | something so therefore it gives that team mentality. And that's why everybody |
| 1053 | 01:33:37 --> 01:33:41 | that's outside of my community when I teach this stuff, regardless of how |
| 1054 | 01:33:41 --> 01:33:44 | precise it is, regardless of how many people are making money with it, |
| 1055 | 01:33:44 --> 01:33:47 | regardless of how many people have proven it works, not in my own hands. |
| 1056 | 01:33:47 --> 01:33:51 | That's not enough everybody else that has done it and used it and make money |
| 1057 | 01:33:51 --> 01:33:57 | with it, you have a huge daunting task of proving it doesn't work when you have |
| 1058 | 01:33:57 --> 01:34:02 | such an army of witnesses proving that it does work. But everybody outside our |
| 1059 | 01:34:02 --> 01:34:07 | community takes shots at me because I'm very I'm I'm an equal opportunity prick. |
| 1060 | 01:34:07 --> 01:34:10 | I'm gonna piss in the corn flakes of everybody else's stuff, because it all |
| 1061 | 01:34:10 --> 01:34:16 | doesn't work, because they think it works. That's not enough. You can't sit |
| 1062 | 01:34:16 --> 01:34:19 | out here in every single candle use your theology and explain why it's gonna do |
| 1063 | 01:34:19 --> 01:34:23 | it. You can't call your shit beforehand and map it out all day long. On a one |
| 1064 | 01:34:23 --> 01:34:27 | minute sharp you can't do it. You'll have a hit and miss type thing once in a |
| 1065 | 01:34:27 --> 01:34:32 | while. It'll happen, but you'll champion that like a like a pony. Here's the pony |
| 1066 | 01:34:32 --> 01:34:36 | show. Look at this. Here's my one trick pony win today. But it's all together |
| 1067 | 01:34:36 --> 01:34:39 | something when you're out here over life, price action, not Market Replay, |
| 1068 | 01:34:39 --> 01:34:44 | not hindsight, shit, you have to be able to draw the analogies from something you |
| 1069 | 01:34:44 --> 01:34:52 | have seen work for decades, that you had a hand in, that you authored. |
| 1070 | 01:34:54 --> 01:34:58 | You get what I'm putting down. You getting it? Are you getting it? You. |
| 1071 | 01:35:02 --> 01:35:06 | There's nothing like this, because everything else is external to the |
| 1072 | 01:35:06 --> 01:35:12 | market. I am the market. This is the actual source code. This is the stuff |
| 1073 | 01:35:12 --> 01:35:18 | that goes on every day. And when they put their hands in there and they start |
| 1074 | 01:35:18 --> 01:35:22 | monkeying around with it, you have to take a step back, wait for it to go back |
| 1075 | 01:35:22 --> 01:35:31 | into doing normal filing at scripts, but we can identify when a script is |
| 1076 | 01:35:31 --> 01:35:39 | changed. Remember that little scene in the movie The Matrix. They're inside the |
| 1077 | 01:35:39 --> 01:35:44 | building, and they're inside the matrix, if you will. And Neo sees that little |
| 1078 | 01:35:44 --> 01:35:49 | black cat. He walks out in the opening of the doorway, and all of a sudden he |
| 1079 | 01:35:49 --> 01:35:54 | sees it again. And he says, That's weird, you know, I'm having like a deja |
| 1080 | 01:35:54 --> 01:35:58 | vu moment. And she because they all realized that he noticed something. And |
| 1081 | 01:35:58 --> 01:36:03 | true. Yes, it's a movie, but the analogy is the same. They said, What did you |
| 1082 | 01:36:03 --> 01:36:08 | see? He goes, Well, I saw a cat, and then I saw it again. Because, oh, they |
| 1083 | 01:36:08 --> 01:36:13 | just made a change. They just made a change. That's what this is doing. Okay, |
| 1084 | 01:36:14 --> 01:36:17 | watch what's happening. The market trades out to a level you were told to |
| 1085 | 01:36:17 --> 01:36:21 | anticipate yesterday as an upside objective, the fact that it draws to it |
| 1086 | 01:36:21 --> 01:36:26 | is one part. But does it draw to it after creating relative equal highs, |
| 1087 | 01:36:27 --> 01:36:31 | failing to hit it on the 830 news driver, because I would have preferred, |
| 1088 | 01:36:31 --> 01:36:36 | I would have preferred truth be told. While watching it, I anticipated that to |
| 1089 | 01:36:36 --> 01:36:41 | hit that. I was surprised that it didn't. But all it did was stay inside |
| 1090 | 01:36:41 --> 01:36:46 | the range right here, so they left that high intact there, traded just a little |
| 1091 | 01:36:46 --> 01:36:50 | bit above that one there and right in here. So what are they doing? What are |
| 1092 | 01:36:50 --> 01:36:55 | they doing and as a helping hand to the retail trader? Well, they're giving them |
| 1093 | 01:36:55 --> 01:36:59 | what they're looking for, right? They're giving them resistance. So what are they |
| 1094 | 01:36:59 --> 01:37:03 | going to do? They're going to try to sell short rate at this level, or maybe |
| 1095 | 01:37:03 --> 01:37:06 | just a little bit above, once it starts moving in their favor, because now |
| 1096 | 01:37:06 --> 01:37:09 | they're convinced it's going to go lower. So where are they going to put |
| 1097 | 01:37:09 --> 01:37:13 | their stop loss? Oh, that's easy, right above where the books tell them, right |
| 1098 | 01:37:13 --> 01:37:16 | above these highs. And it's not a good enough point to do that. The ones that |
| 1099 | 01:37:16 --> 01:37:20 | are real prudent, they don't want to, they don't want to get stopped out |
| 1100 | 01:37:20 --> 01:37:24 | because, hey, they know enough about support and resistance that sometimes it |
| 1101 | 01:37:24 --> 01:37:27 | goes just a little bit above it, so they're going to be really smart and put |
| 1102 | 01:37:27 --> 01:37:31 | their stop loss rate above that high there. Okay, well, the algorithm knows |
| 1103 | 01:37:31 --> 01:37:36 | that, because those highs and lows are formed by it, not the buying and selling |
| 1104 | 01:37:36 --> 01:37:39 | pressure, but it also knows the fucking shit that I gave you yesterday, which is |
| 1105 | 01:37:39 --> 01:37:43 | the logic it's going to go up to some random bullshit level found in another |
| 1106 | 01:37:43 --> 01:37:52 | retail idea, nope. New week opening. Got right there. Bang. Then it overlaps. It |
| 1107 | 01:37:52 --> 01:37:58 | changes the state of delivery from buy side to sell side. That means every |
| 1108 | 01:37:58 --> 01:38:06 | premium array, everything that could be used as an ICT trader, Smart Money |
| 1109 | 01:38:06 --> 01:38:10 | concepts that are used for shorts, anything that would prevent price from |
| 1110 | 01:38:10 --> 01:38:16 | going any higher. That's what your eyeball starts looking for. Okay, but |
| 1111 | 01:38:16 --> 01:38:22 | you go through the range, this is where we need to high. This is where we change |
| 1112 | 01:38:22 --> 01:38:26 | the state of delivery. And now we're in a move that is in sell side delivery. |
| 1113 | 01:38:26 --> 01:38:29 | That means you're in a sell program, folks. That means the market's going |
| 1114 | 01:38:29 --> 01:38:35 | lower for the Express purposes of repricing to any inefficiency. That |
| 1115 | 01:38:35 --> 01:38:39 | means a fair value gap, buy side, imbalance, sell side, efficiency, sell |
| 1116 | 01:38:39 --> 01:38:44 | side and balance, cell sign in efficiency or WIC, consequent |
| 1117 | 01:38:44 --> 01:38:53 | encroachment, good, ICP, it's starting to make sense to me. Good. From that |
| 1118 | 01:38:53 --> 01:38:58 | high to that low, we can go back through and see everything over here and down |
| 1119 | 01:38:58 --> 01:39:04 | into that WIC, where's the pertinent, useful information? Now think about |
| 1120 | 01:39:04 --> 01:39:09 | this. Think because Wyckoff doesn't do this, supply demand doesn't do this. |
| 1121 | 01:39:10 --> 01:39:13 | Elliot wave has no fucking idea he's he's still waiting for a wave. He's |
| 1122 | 01:39:14 --> 01:39:20 | sitting out there on a surfboard waiting the covid. ICT is out here, calling it |
| 1123 | 01:39:20 --> 01:39:27 | live, riding the big waves, calling every little, tiny, little tube going |
| 1124 | 01:39:27 --> 01:39:31 | through it. You can see me out there. See, see the sun glistening off the |
| 1125 | 01:39:31 --> 01:39:34 | crest of the wave, and see that, look at that. I'm not even getting sun fucking |
| 1126 | 01:39:34 --> 01:39:38 | burned. It's beautiful. There's some block necessary. I'm bringing the |
| 1127 | 01:39:38 --> 01:39:45 | fucking heat. This guy's a character. So the high to that low, you go back |
| 1128 | 01:39:45 --> 01:39:50 | through all the price movement here, okay, and what you're looking for is |
| 1129 | 01:39:50 --> 01:39:55 | anything that was offered as a discount array when it was going up to that high, |
| 1130 | 01:39:56 --> 01:40:02 | it will reverse its role. That's how I know what. Chpd array to use as an |
| 1131 | 01:40:02 --> 01:40:09 | inversion level. Okay, if we are looking for in here, let's see it like this. See |
| 1132 | 01:40:09 --> 01:40:14 | how we have we have a gap here, and we have a gap here, and we also have this |
| 1133 | 01:40:14 --> 01:40:20 | down closed candle, so we have a gap inside of the range of an order block. |
| 1134 | 01:40:22 --> 01:40:27 | You have to look at that and think, okay, that's something that we can use |
| 1135 | 01:40:27 --> 01:40:33 | as a buy. And we see it there, and it was valid there until we get to this |
| 1136 | 01:40:33 --> 01:40:41 | high and over here. So this has been used there as a buy. So extending it |
| 1137 | 01:40:41 --> 01:40:47 | further over here, what can we anticipate acting as some form of |
| 1138 | 01:40:47 --> 01:40:52 | resistance, an inversion. Okay, so order blocks, they can they can invert. They |
| 1139 | 01:40:52 --> 01:40:56 | can reverse their role, their characteristics can change, just like |
| 1140 | 01:40:56 --> 01:41:00 | these candles here are showing you that little glitch in the matrix, that deja |
| 1141 | 01:41:00 --> 01:41:04 | vu moment where Neo said I saw a cat, and I feel like I saw that same cat do |
| 1142 | 01:41:04 --> 01:41:08 | the same thing. And the other members, like Trinity and Morpheus and whoever |
| 1143 | 01:41:08 --> 01:41:11 | else did, the people, I don't remember their names, they were like, Oh no, |
| 1144 | 01:41:11 --> 01:41:15 | there's a change. We gotta go, because they know that the agents were in there |
| 1145 | 01:41:15 --> 01:41:19 | making changes, and they're gonna they found them basically, okay, well, what |
| 1146 | 01:41:19 --> 01:41:23 | you're doing is you're looking for these little changes in the algorithm. When |
| 1147 | 01:41:23 --> 01:41:30 | price changes its routine, they're never, ever, ever going to be able to |
| 1148 | 01:41:30 --> 01:41:35 | change this, folks. I don't know how to say it any plainer than that. Okay, what |
| 1149 | 01:41:35 --> 01:41:40 | they can do, let's let me make, let me make some Devil's advocates, these |
| 1150 | 01:41:40 --> 01:41:44 | little, these little, okay, this is what could happen. But it still does just |
| 1151 | 01:41:44 --> 01:41:47 | change it. It just means that you might take a trade with this information and |
| 1152 | 01:41:47 --> 01:41:50 | then they run that hide one more time. Boom. Okay, well, you just got stopped |
| 1153 | 01:41:50 --> 01:41:55 | out. That's all that's happened to me before it's happened. You watched me do |
| 1154 | 01:41:55 --> 01:41:58 | it the other day. I was showing you my trade. I knew I even told my son. I |
| 1155 | 01:41:58 --> 01:42:04 | said, I'm going to show my trade, and as soon as I make my stop loss public, good |
| 1156 | 01:42:04 --> 01:42:08 | old Phil right to the stop, and then it'll go where I want to go. But doesn't |
| 1157 | 01:42:08 --> 01:42:11 | change the fact that there's a winning trade. But the point is, |
| 1158 | 01:42:12 --> 01:42:12 | if |
| 1159 | 01:42:12 --> 01:42:16 | you get stopped out, you just got stopped out on that transit, that |
| 1160 | 01:42:16 --> 01:42:20 | transaction, it's just one trade that that's the outcome of that one. But you |
| 1161 | 01:42:20 --> 01:42:23 | can't take your attention and say, well, this means everything's flawed. It never |
| 1162 | 01:42:23 --> 01:42:29 | it's never going to work. So let me go find an indicator. No, it just means |
| 1163 | 01:42:29 --> 01:42:33 | that that individual transaction, like that one day, driving to work and you |
| 1164 | 01:42:33 --> 01:42:36 | got a flat tire. You didn't know you're going to get a flat tire. Is it possible |
| 1165 | 01:42:36 --> 01:42:40 | you're going to get a flat tire? Sure. Are you going to stop going to your job |
| 1166 | 01:42:40 --> 01:42:44 | pissed off in defiance because you got a flat tire. There must be something about |
| 1167 | 01:42:44 --> 01:42:49 | that place where I work at fuck that guy. Fuck that person that runs that |
| 1168 | 01:42:49 --> 01:42:52 | company. Fuck that company. Fuck all the time and tenure I put into it I got a |
| 1169 | 01:42:52 --> 01:42:56 | flat tire. Fuck them. I'm never coming back. That's what you're doing. When you |
| 1170 | 01:42:56 --> 01:43:01 | say I'm gonna work with a methodology, but first time it fails on me. I'm done. |
| 1171 | 01:43:01 --> 01:43:04 | I'm looking for the offering. I'm gonna change. I'm gonna start looking. That's |
| 1172 | 01:43:04 --> 01:43:09 | a system hopping and traders that start out in the beginning. They do a lot of |
| 1173 | 01:43:09 --> 01:43:12 | that. I did it right? I ain't got no shame in telling you, because I didn't |
| 1174 | 01:43:12 --> 01:43:17 | know any better. But when you come here, when you're listening to me, I might not |
| 1175 | 01:43:17 --> 01:43:21 | be so eloquent all the time when I speak, I may not be your cup of tea for |
| 1176 | 01:43:21 --> 01:43:25 | someone to listen to around your children, okay? But I'm not gonna give |
| 1177 | 01:43:25 --> 01:43:28 | you bullshit. I'm gonna give you the stuff that works. I'm gonna cut to the |
| 1178 | 01:43:28 --> 01:43:33 | bone marrow. I'm gonna get right down to what matters most. And you think I'm not |
| 1179 | 01:43:33 --> 01:43:36 | getting to what matters you're not getting to the point. ICT, the point is |
| 1180 | 01:43:36 --> 01:43:40 | you're gonna fuck up if you don't listen to everything. I'm telling you, that's |
| 1181 | 01:43:40 --> 01:43:45 | the point. But you don't want to hear it. It's good medicine. It might not |
| 1182 | 01:43:45 --> 01:43:53 | taste all that good, but swallow. Okay, swallow. It's good for you. So now, when |
| 1183 | 01:43:53 --> 01:43:57 | this cross over that opening price, we're interested in seeing everything |
| 1184 | 01:43:57 --> 01:44:04 | gravitate lower. So because I'm teaching my son incrementally to build in these |
| 1185 | 01:44:04 --> 01:44:10 | objectives of just looking for small, little modular moves, small little |
| 1186 | 01:44:10 --> 01:44:14 | modular moves. Let me get this off now, because they asked over on Instagram, |
| 1187 | 01:44:14 --> 01:44:17 | pretend to be me with 2000 followers. Whether they're real or not, I don't |
| 1188 | 01:44:17 --> 01:44:25 | know. I love pissing in his face all the time. So the that level right there, it |
| 1189 | 01:44:25 --> 01:44:30 | goes up and just touches. Well, it doesn't touch really, because that's too |
| 1190 | 01:44:30 --> 01:44:36 | high. We were one tick away, a half a tick away and a quarter tick away in |
| 1191 | 01:44:36 --> 01:44:45 | here, but then get into the Fairbank. Yeah, it did use the breaker here, and |
| 1192 | 01:44:45 --> 01:44:49 | it did qualify and prove that that change in the state of delivery, we want |
| 1193 | 01:44:49 --> 01:44:53 | to see it roll over. It does this wick. We talked about how, when it went |
| 1194 | 01:44:53 --> 01:44:58 | through, that the market's going to come right back up, because it's going to use |
| 1195 | 01:44:58 --> 01:45:03 | this reference point and this. Fair value gap and this old key price level |
| 1196 | 01:45:03 --> 01:45:06 | at 6pm the opening. Because there's no difference between where we closed |
| 1197 | 01:45:06 --> 01:45:11 | yesterday at 5pm that closing price and the first print at 6pm they're same |
| 1198 | 01:45:11 --> 01:45:15 | price. So you're just going to draw a line like that. You can annotate that |
| 1199 | 01:45:15 --> 01:45:19 | anything you want. You can call it the 6pm opening price, no gap. Or you can |
| 1200 | 01:45:19 --> 01:45:26 | just say new session starts 6pm there's, I don't ever have a name. It's just I |
| 1201 | 01:45:26 --> 01:45:30 | draw a line. Okay, so if I wanted to have a name for it, it'd be one of |
| 1202 | 01:45:30 --> 01:45:33 | those. You can, you can name it whatever you want. I'm sure it'll be in |
| 1203 | 01:45:33 --> 01:45:36 | somebody's Amazon book, and they'll, they'll talk about it. They won't credit |
| 1204 | 01:45:36 --> 01:45:39 | me, though, and then I find out if I find out about it later on, because |
| 1205 | 01:45:39 --> 01:45:42 | somebody's going to eventually buy the book. And they're saying, it sounds like |
| 1206 | 01:45:42 --> 01:45:45 | I said he's sounds like I said he's bullshit, and then I'm gonna hear about |
| 1207 | 01:45:45 --> 01:45:48 | an email, and then I'm gonna buy their bullshit, and then I'm gonna go on their |
| 1208 | 01:45:48 --> 01:45:52 | reviews and say, this is horseshit. It's all lies. Go to my YouTube channel in |
| 1209 | 01:45:52 --> 01:45:54 | this fucking video, and you'll see that this is where they got it. And then |
| 1210 | 01:45:54 --> 01:45:57 | nobody wants to buy your book, and they call you an asshole and a plagiarist, |
| 1211 | 01:45:57 --> 01:46:04 | just like John fipaloti did. So if we see that the market, it does, in fact, |
| 1212 | 01:46:04 --> 01:46:10 | go down to our intermediate term price level, which is what the first target |
| 1213 | 01:46:10 --> 01:46:17 | below all the bodies. See all these candlesticks right here, so ignore this |
| 1214 | 01:46:17 --> 01:46:21 | wick for a moment. Okay. See all that, all this range, ignore that for a |
| 1215 | 01:46:21 --> 01:46:27 | moment. Okay, and say price only looked like it did with the bodies, not the |
| 1216 | 01:46:27 --> 01:46:32 | wicks underneath them. So the market dropped down here, all these bodies, and |
| 1217 | 01:46:32 --> 01:46:39 | then we started going up. I want to target something below those bodies. So |
| 1218 | 01:46:39 --> 01:46:46 | what PD array. Do I have below them? Well, if I use this closing price here, |
| 1219 | 01:46:46 --> 01:46:51 | that's a rejection block. You can use that. And I taught my students this, |
| 1220 | 01:46:51 --> 01:46:55 | that's that's a level to aim for as a partial and see if we can get to it and |
| 1221 | 01:46:55 --> 01:47:00 | then hold on to it and see if it can go down and continuously move. But I didn't |
| 1222 | 01:47:00 --> 01:47:04 | introduce every aspect about Wix. They're learning it right alongside of |
| 1223 | 01:47:04 --> 01:47:08 | you right now, today, on August 14, 2024 on live stream, on my YouTube channel, |
| 1224 | 01:47:10 --> 01:47:16 | you're getting it the same way at the same time. This wick, it's consequent |
| 1225 | 01:47:16 --> 01:47:22 | encroachment is below the rejection block. So it goes without saying, If I |
| 1226 | 01:47:22 --> 01:47:29 | anticipate the right the price Run from here and in here, going down to this |
| 1227 | 01:47:29 --> 01:47:34 | level, we have to gage whether or not does it have the ability to trade below |
| 1228 | 01:47:34 --> 01:47:40 | it. We only do so for the wick. But remember, I was telling you watch and |
| 1229 | 01:47:40 --> 01:47:44 | see, does the bodies confirm that level? It did right? And then what does it do? |
| 1230 | 01:47:44 --> 01:47:48 | It returns back to an old area, inefficiency, and that old 6pm opening |
| 1231 | 01:47:48 --> 01:47:53 | price. These are all old friends folks. How many times have I talked about |
| 1232 | 01:47:53 --> 01:47:57 | those, those key points, they're not, they're not a zone. Some in ambiguous |
| 1233 | 01:47:57 --> 01:48:02 | where, what do I pick as a price in a zone, supply and demand zone. If the |
| 1234 | 01:48:02 --> 01:48:08 | range that creates that supply and demand zone is 15 to 20 handles, or 12 |
| 1235 | 01:48:08 --> 01:48:12 | handles or eight handles, which one of those levels are important to you as a |
| 1236 | 01:48:12 --> 01:48:15 | trader? Which one are you going to use? How are you going to use it for the |
| 1237 | 01:48:15 --> 01:48:21 | purposes of managing with a stop loss? See, in fact, that's why it's |
| 1238 | 01:48:21 --> 01:48:24 | nonsensical. Now I'm not saying somehow some people can't say, Well, you know, |
| 1239 | 01:48:24 --> 01:48:29 | if it's, if it's a demand zone, just use the highest level, okay, that sounds |
| 1240 | 01:48:29 --> 01:48:34 | pretty good. And you should stop below plus the range of the supply and demand |
| 1241 | 01:48:34 --> 01:48:37 | zone, or some percentage of a quarter percent of it, or half percent of it as |
| 1242 | 01:48:37 --> 01:48:40 | a stop. Okay, that's a pretty good methodology. Yeah, there's something |
| 1243 | 01:48:40 --> 01:48:46 | wrong with that, but that ain't good enough for me. Like I want to know, I |
| 1244 | 01:48:46 --> 01:48:50 | want to know that I can put a stop loss on this son of a bitch, and I'm going to |
| 1245 | 01:48:50 --> 01:48:53 | be in there, and it's going to take a real move. They're going to have to |
| 1246 | 01:48:53 --> 01:48:59 | really come at me, to take me out. Not just static price action, just normal |
| 1247 | 01:48:59 --> 01:49:04 | volatility. That is, oh, it stops me like yesterday when I was live |
| 1248 | 01:49:04 --> 01:49:08 | streaming, like, or was it Monday? I can't remember which one I was, but I |
| 1249 | 01:49:08 --> 01:49:12 | showed my trade and it went right up after I said it's probably gonna go up |
| 1250 | 01:49:12 --> 01:49:15 | there, knock it out and fill with reprice and then send it down to where I |
| 1251 | 01:49:16 --> 01:49:20 | was aiming for it. I was like, a go, Fuck you. ICD in front of everybody. |
| 1252 | 01:49:20 --> 01:49:23 | That's all right, that's okay. I still beat his ass, and I'm gonna beat you |
| 1253 | 01:49:23 --> 01:49:27 | again tonight and tomorrow and next fucking week is gonna be the same thing. |
| 1254 | 01:49:27 --> 01:49:34 | It's fun. I'm having fun with it sport, but it takes a real move, not just |
| 1255 | 01:49:34 --> 01:49:41 | static randomness, because if these things hold logic that's valid, then |
| 1256 | 01:49:41 --> 01:49:47 | they will work more times than they fail. Not just 60% of the time, okay, |
| 1257 | 01:49:47 --> 01:49:59 | but the majority of the time, the majority of them, you can't have this. |
| 1258 | 01:50:00 --> 01:50:03 | Degree of precision these elements that repeat over and over and over again |
| 1259 | 01:50:03 --> 01:50:09 | without it having some control mechanism in play. It's only being allowed to do |
| 1260 | 01:50:09 --> 01:50:16 | certain things. And it is a facade. It is nonsense to try to make an argument |
| 1261 | 01:50:16 --> 01:50:21 | that the random buying and selling participants of buyers and sellers |
| 1262 | 01:50:21 --> 01:50:28 | traders at these price points that we can see in advance. We can see this in |
| 1263 | 01:50:28 --> 01:50:35 | advance. And then it books price this way, and it supports the underlying |
| 1264 | 01:50:35 --> 01:50:39 | narrative that, okay, yeah, we moved from here down to there. The body |
| 1265 | 01:50:39 --> 01:50:43 | supported it said, Okay, we're not closing below it. So it's rallying up. |
| 1266 | 01:50:43 --> 01:50:50 | Did we take out the low No, did we go to the lower quadrant of that wick? No, |
| 1267 | 01:50:50 --> 01:50:56 | they're still in play then. So if it's going up here, why is it going up? It's |
| 1268 | 01:50:56 --> 01:51:02 | going back up to an order in efficiency, and it's reverting back to where the day |
| 1269 | 01:51:02 --> 01:51:09 | started. The first print at 6pm last night, New York, local time. It crosses |
| 1270 | 01:51:09 --> 01:51:13 | that again. I believe it would have done that, even if that fair value gap wasn't |
| 1271 | 01:51:13 --> 01:51:16 | there, and even if this wick wasn't there, that's something I would have |
| 1272 | 01:51:16 --> 01:51:20 | expected, regardless of anything else needing to be there. That's something I |
| 1273 | 01:51:20 --> 01:51:26 | would expect, because from here, going up higher, we don't have a gap here. We |
| 1274 | 01:51:26 --> 01:51:29 | don't have a fair value gap there. We don't have a fair value gap there, but |
| 1275 | 01:51:29 --> 01:51:34 | we have it there. So let's say that this wick here touched this candlesticks low, |
| 1276 | 01:51:34 --> 01:51:38 | so there's no fair value gap that's shaded in a thing. Okay? And let's say |
| 1277 | 01:51:38 --> 01:51:43 | that wick didn't exist. Say the candles that stopped up here. So the only |
| 1278 | 01:51:43 --> 01:51:46 | information I would have is it's going up just to touch that 6pm |
| 1279 | 01:51:48 --> 01:51:55 | price again and maybe bump if this was the candles body, this is your order |
| 1280 | 01:51:55 --> 01:52:00 | block, so it might want to come back up and bump that again. But because we have |
| 1281 | 01:52:00 --> 01:52:03 | the fair value gap and the 6pm opening price, and we have this consequent |
| 1282 | 01:52:03 --> 01:52:09 | encroachment. See how there's several layered things there. So right away, you |
| 1283 | 01:52:09 --> 01:52:12 | know that it's reasonable to get gravitate back to this, because that's |
| 1284 | 01:52:12 --> 01:52:18 | the first real thing that that's that's a real level. If there's ever a question |
| 1285 | 01:52:18 --> 01:52:26 | of what's the most likely level to trade to when we're like, like, when we're |
| 1286 | 01:52:26 --> 01:52:31 | down here, I'm going to err on this side of going to that price level before the |
| 1287 | 01:52:31 --> 01:52:35 | fair value gap. Because what can fair value gaps do? They can stay open. Well, |
| 1288 | 01:52:35 --> 01:52:40 | it sounds like you're making a bullshit no. Think about what I've been teaching |
| 1289 | 01:52:40 --> 01:52:45 | you. If I'm short, if I'm bearish, and I see a fair value gap above price, market |
| 1290 | 01:52:45 --> 01:52:48 | price, and if it goes up there, what do I want to see about that fair value gap? |
| 1291 | 01:52:48 --> 01:52:53 | Do I want to see it close in? Fuck, no, I don't want to. I've already told you |
| 1292 | 01:52:53 --> 01:52:57 | that I want to see the upper half of that or some degree above midpoint. I |
| 1293 | 01:52:57 --> 01:53:02 | want to see it stay open. Why? Why do I want to see that? I want every fair |
| 1294 | 01:53:02 --> 01:53:08 | value gap that's above my target when I'm short and I'm still in a trade, I |
| 1295 | 01:53:08 --> 01:53:13 | want to see some of those fair value gaps stay open, because that's telling |
| 1296 | 01:53:13 --> 01:53:18 | me this is so weak It can't even go back up there and reprice to it and then |
| 1297 | 01:53:18 --> 01:53:23 | close it in. But because it does so here, it's okay, it doesn't change, it |
| 1298 | 01:53:23 --> 01:53:28 | doesn't strip the efficacy of this methodology. It just means that, well, |
| 1299 | 01:53:28 --> 01:53:34 | you know, we had consequent pressure here. We had the 6pm price that acts |
| 1300 | 01:53:34 --> 01:53:37 | just like a new day opening gap, but because there's no gap there, you just |
| 1301 | 01:53:37 --> 01:53:42 | use the 6pm opening price. You don't use the 5pm you use the 6pm why? Because |
| 1302 | 01:53:42 --> 01:53:48 | that's the first print so the algorithm is going to go right back to that. If |
| 1303 | 01:53:48 --> 01:53:54 | there's no gap, you're focusing on whatever the 6pm there's no confusion. |
| 1304 | 01:53:54 --> 01:54:01 | There is it is that complicated? No whatever that 6pm price is, that's what |
| 1305 | 01:54:01 --> 01:54:04 | you have annotated on your chart. You can annotate it any way you want. I just |
| 1306 | 01:54:04 --> 01:54:09 | chose to use this again. I don't have this stuff on my chart. It's only for |
| 1307 | 01:54:09 --> 01:54:15 | the purpose of teaching my son. Here, all these levels are in notation form, |
| 1308 | 01:54:16 --> 01:54:22 | like writing it down on your little like nine by five, yellow pamphlet, like |
| 1309 | 01:54:22 --> 01:54:27 | little I buy them from Office Depot. You get, like, 12 of them in a bundle. And |
| 1310 | 01:54:27 --> 01:54:31 | every day, I write the date, and I write down I'm looking for a sale program, |
| 1311 | 01:54:31 --> 01:54:35 | looking for a buy program, based on what I think it's likely to happen for the |
| 1312 | 01:54:35 --> 01:54:40 | scenario. And then I write down any PB array that's going to be useful to me, |
| 1313 | 01:54:40 --> 01:54:44 | what their prices and the time. So I'm writing the time and the PD array with |
| 1314 | 01:54:44 --> 01:54:50 | the price, so I have it in numeric format and labeling on my notepad, and |
| 1315 | 01:54:50 --> 01:54:57 | my chart is completely naked. It's it's actually harder for me when I have all |
| 1316 | 01:54:57 --> 01:55:03 | this stuff on the chart, because I. I end up spending more time talking or |
| 1317 | 01:55:03 --> 01:55:06 | paying attention to the things I'm annotating for you as a student |
| 1318 | 01:55:06 --> 01:55:09 | learning, and it distracts me from watching the actual price action, |
| 1319 | 01:55:10 --> 01:55:13 | especially over a live stream where I'm communicating, I'm teaching, I'm |
| 1320 | 01:55:13 --> 01:55:18 | lecturing over something, and it kind of like takes my my time and focus off of |
| 1321 | 01:55:18 --> 01:55:23 | the real time candle. So this month of August is a lot of this type of stuff |
| 1322 | 01:55:23 --> 01:55:26 | going on. But once we get through August, in September, I'm just going to |
| 1323 | 01:55:26 --> 01:55:30 | be talking about what the individual candles are happening at the moment and |
| 1324 | 01:55:30 --> 01:55:34 | where they may gravitate to and all this other stuff. This is the supported |
| 1325 | 01:55:34 --> 01:55:40 | commentary and things that I feel that's necessary as I go along. I wanted to see |
| 1326 | 01:55:40 --> 01:55:44 | speaking only about every individual candle that's forming, so that way Caleb |
| 1327 | 01:55:44 --> 01:55:49 | can watch and see what I'm thinking about every candlestick as it's forming. |
| 1328 | 01:55:49 --> 01:55:57 | Which brings me up to the point of Al Brooks. I am not teaching al Brooks |
| 1329 | 01:55:57 --> 01:56:03 | stuff, and now al Brooks doesn't use any of this stuff, either. Okay, I talked to |
| 1330 | 01:56:03 --> 01:56:08 | Tom hugard, who is a student and fan of Al Brooks, and he himself said that |
| 1331 | 01:56:08 --> 01:56:11 | there's no, there's no comparisons, totally, absolutely not the same thing. |
| 1332 | 01:56:11 --> 01:56:15 | So that's the new flavor of the month where they're saying, No, I took his |
| 1333 | 01:56:15 --> 01:56:20 | stuff because al Brooks apparently teaches, you know, reading Christ |
| 1334 | 01:56:20 --> 01:56:25 | action, one candle at a time. He reading it like this. I'm a new language that |
| 1335 | 01:56:25 --> 01:56:28 | everybody's learning. Okay? I'm not reinventing the wheel. I'm not |
| 1336 | 01:56:28 --> 01:56:33 | transcribing and translating something someone else did. This is a whole new |
| 1337 | 01:56:33 --> 01:56:39 | science. We're evolving. Okay? We're way beyond everything else. But if you want |
| 1338 | 01:56:39 --> 01:56:42 | to collect that $5 million go through his stuff and see how everything I'm |
| 1339 | 01:56:42 --> 01:56:48 | teaching ain't there, do your best, because it's either is or there isn't, |
| 1340 | 01:56:48 --> 01:56:53 | and there ain't nobody out there that's like me. But you go through all of these |
| 1341 | 01:56:53 --> 01:56:58 | PD arrays, anything that has a gap, and we were talking about this one over |
| 1342 | 01:56:58 --> 01:57:01 | here, and then you have a gap right there. So you have an order block and a |
| 1343 | 01:57:01 --> 01:57:04 | fair value gap. So if I ever have a fair value gap, an order block that's inside |
| 1344 | 01:57:04 --> 01:57:08 | the range, meaning that see the high of that candle, the down, closed candle, |
| 1345 | 01:57:08 --> 01:57:13 | the black one, and you have this candles low, that's that's basically the same |
| 1346 | 01:57:13 --> 01:57:20 | range. This gap is inside of the of the little shorter block. So what am I going |
| 1347 | 01:57:20 --> 01:57:24 | to refer, but refer to, am I going to label it with the gap levels? Where am I |
| 1348 | 01:57:24 --> 01:57:29 | to use the order block? I'm going to use the order block. Okay, so I'll use this |
| 1349 | 01:57:29 --> 01:57:31 | range here. And what you do is you take this, this is how you do |
| 1350 | 01:57:40 --> 01:57:43 | it all. Right? So initially, when we went down below the opening price on |
| 1351 | 01:57:43 --> 01:57:46 | this bear, shorter block, changing the state of delivery. So that means your |
| 1352 | 01:57:46 --> 01:57:52 | mind turns to, okay, the market's going to just keep offering lower prices. It's |
| 1353 | 01:57:52 --> 01:57:55 | going to have little retracements. It's going to have little pops up higher, but |
| 1354 | 01:57:55 --> 01:57:59 | they're going to be short lived. They're going to be very controlled. They're |
| 1355 | 01:57:59 --> 01:58:03 | going to be stunted. They won't be allowed to be really protracted to the |
| 1356 | 01:58:03 --> 01:58:08 | upside. And then, once it gets to a level that I'm teaching that the market |
| 1357 | 01:58:08 --> 01:58:13 | referred to, which is a premium. PD array, everyone that forms as delivery |
| 1358 | 01:58:13 --> 01:58:20 | is unfolding. They're salient too. But if there isn't an inefficiency in the |
| 1359 | 01:58:20 --> 01:58:24 | price run, going lower as it drops, whereas we ended up creating one here. |
| 1360 | 01:58:24 --> 01:58:27 | See that fair value gap that we've been talking about. That's the first fair |
| 1361 | 01:58:27 --> 01:58:30 | value gap. This small, little one in here. I wouldn't care so much about |
| 1362 | 01:58:30 --> 01:58:35 | that. And the reason why is because it's still inside of the range of the water |
| 1363 | 01:58:35 --> 01:58:41 | block that we extend over here. So this was used as a buy. We can see that here. |
| 1364 | 01:58:41 --> 01:58:45 | And then when we went into a sell program, now, the market's going to |
| 1365 | 01:58:45 --> 01:58:49 | start going lower at this time. So the market goes up. We watch the seat |
| 1366 | 01:58:49 --> 01:58:52 | doesn't want to get into fair value. Remember I was saying, when you watch |
| 1367 | 01:58:52 --> 01:58:56 | the stream, you'll hear me say, I'm interested in this one. I want to see. I |
| 1368 | 01:58:56 --> 01:59:03 | want to see. Why am I saying that? Because we're inside of a breaker, and |
| 1369 | 01:59:03 --> 01:59:06 | it might be enough just to simply do that trade into the breaker and not go |
| 1370 | 01:59:06 --> 01:59:10 | up there. And it's actually a good thing for you to see where trying to be very, |
| 1371 | 01:59:10 --> 01:59:14 | very precise, and you having limit orders as your entry mechanism, you may |
| 1372 | 01:59:14 --> 01:59:18 | not get a fill. So what do you do? You use the price delivery continuum theory. |
| 1373 | 01:59:18 --> 01:59:23 | It means, okay, your time frame on a one minute basis. Here suggests that this is |
| 1374 | 01:59:23 --> 01:59:26 | where you're trying to get in at. But if it starts to run without you, do you |
| 1375 | 01:59:26 --> 01:59:30 | just say, Fuck it. I'm gonna start trading oil today. Then I'm not thinking |
| 1376 | 01:59:30 --> 01:59:34 | like that. I used to as a 20 year old when I missed my only setup that I was |
| 1377 | 01:59:34 --> 01:59:38 | anticipating, stalking and hunting if it didn't, if it didn't give me a fill and |
| 1378 | 01:59:38 --> 01:59:41 | it ran away without me, I was like, Okay, I missed the whole thing. And I'm |
| 1379 | 01:59:41 --> 01:59:46 | looking at moves that would be like $8,000 in the bond market. Okay, that's, |
| 1380 | 01:59:47 --> 01:59:57 | that's eight full handles. They're trading $1,000 per handle, so see a |
| 1381 | 01:59:57 --> 02:00:03 | whole 100 point move. Okay? Do. Go one contract, that type of movement would |
| 1382 | 02:00:03 --> 02:00:11 | literally be $1,000 it's $32.25 $31.25 per tick. Okay, so a full run like that, |
| 1383 | 02:00:12 --> 02:00:17 | and if it's eight of those, that's an $8,000 move, and a move like this in the |
| 1384 | 02:00:17 --> 02:00:23 | bond. That means I'm probably missing out on $300 for less than $500 I've |
| 1385 | 02:00:23 --> 02:00:28 | missed it, so therefore I'm not interested in those $7,500 that could |
| 1386 | 02:00:28 --> 02:00:32 | still be taken in my mind when I first started as a trade. And this is probably |
| 1387 | 02:00:32 --> 02:00:35 | what most of you feel this way too. Oh, well, I need to know how to find these |
| 1388 | 02:00:35 --> 02:00:40 | because I I see it happening, and then I miss the move, or I chase it. I don't |
| 1389 | 02:00:40 --> 02:00:43 | know when to get in. I put my stop loss in the wrong place. Or I get place, or I |
| 1390 | 02:00:43 --> 02:00:46 | get scared out of it. I just keep losing, even though I'm right. I know |
| 1391 | 02:00:46 --> 02:00:49 | where it's going. I'm watching your live stream, your point to where it's going, |
| 1392 | 02:00:49 --> 02:00:53 | and I'm taking trades, even though I tell you not to do that, because you're |
| 1393 | 02:00:53 --> 02:00:59 | learning fear anxiety, because you don't know what I know. And just because I'm |
| 1394 | 02:00:59 --> 02:01:03 | highlighting something doesn't guarantee it's gonna happen. And if you're trying |
| 1395 | 02:01:03 --> 02:01:06 | to pass funded accounts and trading 15 contracts because they say that you can |
| 1396 | 02:01:06 --> 02:01:10 | afford to do so, you could still do it wrong and be right in your direction, |
| 1397 | 02:01:10 --> 02:01:14 | that's very frustrating, and you're not gonna blame yourself for breaking the |
| 1398 | 02:01:14 --> 02:01:17 | rules. You're gonna say, I'm an asshole, and this stuff doesn't work, but you sit |
| 1399 | 02:01:17 --> 02:01:21 | down with me and we'll see that you didn't listen. I've had students that |
| 1400 | 02:01:21 --> 02:01:25 | try to do that shit. Show me your logbook. Show me what you've been doing, |
| 1401 | 02:01:26 --> 02:01:28 | show me your trade entries and show me why you got into that fucking trade. |
| 1402 | 02:01:28 --> 02:01:33 | Soon as that question comes up, the conversation ends because they know they |
| 1403 | 02:01:33 --> 02:01:38 | don't listen. Just like I didn't listen when I first started codifying rules |
| 1404 | 02:01:38 --> 02:01:42 | around these ideas, I tried to make excuses for. Well, I'm going to try to |
| 1405 | 02:01:42 --> 02:01:48 | be outperforming these rules. I'm better than this, okay? And I never established |
| 1406 | 02:01:48 --> 02:01:55 | a baseline to trust initially, so I had to force myself to go through that |
| 1407 | 02:01:55 --> 02:01:58 | stuff. And you have to do the same thing. And I'm forcing Kayla to do that. |
| 1408 | 02:01:58 --> 02:02:02 | As you can see, he's not getting an easy way. He's getting the woodshed shit, |
| 1409 | 02:02:02 --> 02:02:06 | just like all of you do, there's a lot of things, and you have to figure out |
| 1410 | 02:02:06 --> 02:02:11 | where your model is in all of it. And you don't need to have every aspect of |
| 1411 | 02:02:11 --> 02:02:17 | what's available. To me as a creator of this stuff, you just have to have little |
| 1412 | 02:02:17 --> 02:02:21 | compartmental, compartmentalized segments of price movement that makes |
| 1413 | 02:02:21 --> 02:02:27 | sense to you. It's logical, it's reasonable to anticipate forming at the |
| 1414 | 02:02:27 --> 02:02:31 | time of day, that it should behave that way. So at this point, at this point, we |
| 1415 | 02:02:31 --> 02:02:36 | start looking for every possible reason for price to trade down. Well, this area |
| 1416 | 02:02:36 --> 02:02:39 | here with the order block, it's in close proximity to where the start of the move |
| 1417 | 02:02:39 --> 02:02:42 | would be. So are you going to have that on your chart and have all that much |
| 1418 | 02:02:42 --> 02:02:48 | interest to it? No, you do want to see it trade below it, which it does here. |
| 1419 | 02:02:49 --> 02:02:54 | So at that point, I'm not interested in that one. So what's below what's below |
| 1420 | 02:02:54 --> 02:03:01 | that, we have this gap right in here, which was already used, yes, but I'm |
| 1421 | 02:03:01 --> 02:03:08 | this |
| 1422 | 02:03:08 --> 02:03:08 | is |
| 1423 | 02:03:08 --> 02:03:13 | all trading inside the range. Okay, I'm gonna change the color of this a little |
| 1424 | 02:03:13 --> 02:03:22 | bit, actually a lot with the this is your gap here, which it trades down to |
| 1425 | 02:03:22 --> 02:03:27 | it here. Why is it trading with that little I call it a mohawk, where it's |
| 1426 | 02:03:27 --> 02:03:31 | colors outside the line. Why is it doing that? Because there's an overlap of that |
| 1427 | 02:03:31 --> 02:03:36 | candles wick in that candle body. So that's a balanced price range. So it's |
| 1428 | 02:03:36 --> 02:03:40 | just validating that it just stops like a, like a, like a, you will not pass. |
| 1429 | 02:03:40 --> 02:03:44 | You can not go any further, okay, and that's why that little Mohawk stops |
| 1430 | 02:03:44 --> 02:03:49 | there. 90% of the Mohawks that I anticipate, where the market trades us |
| 1431 | 02:03:49 --> 02:03:52 | outside of a PD array, I can see them. I can anticipate them. There's logic |
| 1432 | 02:03:52 --> 02:03:55 | behind them. I'm not going to teach you all that stuff, and that part won't be |
| 1433 | 02:03:55 --> 02:03:59 | in the book. Okay, so I want you to know that there's a lot of things I'm not |
| 1434 | 02:03:59 --> 02:04:02 | going to teach because I'm just not going to do it, and I don't give a fuck |
| 1435 | 02:04:02 --> 02:04:08 | who asked and twists my arm and calls me before them I am not teaching it done. |
| 1436 | 02:04:08 --> 02:04:13 | Okay? So you can see how the market uses this fair value gap, which becomes what? |
| 1437 | 02:04:13 --> 02:04:21 | Now let's say, Okay, let's say that you are a fan of the concepts that I'm |
| 1438 | 02:04:21 --> 02:04:24 | teaching, and you really are resonating with them, and maybe some of the things |
| 1439 | 02:04:24 --> 02:04:27 | I'm teaching, it just doesn't jive with you. You're like, I can see when you |
| 1440 | 02:04:27 --> 02:04:31 | point it out, but I wouldn't have saw that. Okay, don't beat yourself about up |
| 1441 | 02:04:31 --> 02:04:36 | about it. What are you noticing in price action? What do you see? Because when |
| 1442 | 02:04:36 --> 02:04:39 | last year on Twitter spaces, when I was teaching the concept of inversion fair |
| 1443 | 02:04:39 --> 02:04:43 | value gap, not every fair value gap becomes an inversion, fair value gap, by |
| 1444 | 02:04:43 --> 02:04:46 | the way, okay? And as a young man out there that's very overzealous about |
| 1445 | 02:04:46 --> 02:04:52 | inversion fair value gaps, and he almost implies that he created himself. But I |
| 1446 | 02:04:52 --> 02:04:58 | understand your enthusiasm, and you're overzealous, but not every fair value |
| 1447 | 02:04:58 --> 02:05:02 | gap becomes an inversion. Fair value gap, okay? Okay, but if you didn't know |
| 1448 | 02:05:02 --> 02:05:07 | the logic that I'm teaching today about the wicks, okay, if I didn't teach that, |
| 1449 | 02:05:07 --> 02:05:11 | and you didn't know anything about it, and there wasn't this gap here in the |
| 1450 | 02:05:11 --> 02:05:15 | pink say that didn't exist in this price time right here, and there wasn't a 6pm |
| 1451 | 02:05:16 --> 02:05:21 | opening price that we would referenced anyway, and say that was the case and |
| 1452 | 02:05:21 --> 02:05:28 | that we still started retracing here, what will we be using? Then that gap |
| 1453 | 02:05:28 --> 02:05:33 | extended over becomes, what inversion, fair value gap, and what would we want |
| 1454 | 02:05:33 --> 02:05:38 | to see with that logic? ICT tell me something that you didn't change and |
| 1455 | 02:05:38 --> 02:05:42 | change the logic around it's got to be consistent, because if it's changing, |
| 1456 | 02:05:42 --> 02:05:45 | you're bullshitting everybody, and I'm getting lucky over live price action. |
| 1457 | 02:05:45 --> 02:05:48 | That's what it sounds like. Okay, to some of you, that's exactly what you |
| 1458 | 02:05:48 --> 02:05:56 | think. But listen what I have said many, many times. If this is the gap here to |
| 1459 | 02:05:56 --> 02:06:02 | here, extend it over. Look at that little square right there. That's the |
| 1460 | 02:06:02 --> 02:06:09 | midpoint. That's consequent encroachment of what that gap that is now going to be |
| 1461 | 02:06:09 --> 02:06:13 | expected to be, what an inversion fair value gap? Do we want the inversion fair |
| 1462 | 02:06:13 --> 02:06:19 | value gaps to close in entirely? In other words, if it trades up to the low |
| 1463 | 02:06:19 --> 02:06:23 | of it. Do we want to see it trade all the way up to the top and touch that? |
| 1464 | 02:06:24 --> 02:06:30 | No, why? Because every inefficiency, if I'm short and it's trading back up into |
| 1465 | 02:06:30 --> 02:06:36 | it, I want to see the upper half, or some portion of the upper half of it |
| 1466 | 02:06:36 --> 02:06:42 | stay open. I want to see that. Why? Because I've been talking about it since |
| 1467 | 02:06:42 --> 02:06:50 | last week. Every array that is an inefficiency, if it's a gap, if it can't |
| 1468 | 02:06:50 --> 02:06:55 | fill the gap entirely, and I'm short, and it trades up there and leaves a |
| 1469 | 02:06:55 --> 02:07:01 | portion of it open. That is telling you the clearest, loudest way to say this |
| 1470 | 02:07:01 --> 02:07:06 | market is not going up. It's weak, so start looking for lower targets. It's |
| 1471 | 02:07:06 --> 02:07:10 | going to go lower. Is that a hard, complicated thing? |
| 1472 | 02:07:10 --> 02:07:11 | No, |
| 1473 | 02:07:12 --> 02:07:19 | am I changing the theory around it? No, is it manifesting itself here? Yep. So |
| 1474 | 02:07:19 --> 02:07:23 | it doesn't matter if you didn't have the 6pm it doesn't matter if you didn't have |
| 1475 | 02:07:23 --> 02:07:26 | this fair value gut, and it doesn't matter if you had this wick here, if you |
| 1476 | 02:07:26 --> 02:07:30 | didn't have any of those things, once it started coming down, and we're in a cell |
| 1477 | 02:07:30 --> 02:07:34 | program, I would be extending these things over here. That's what I use with |
| 1478 | 02:07:34 --> 02:07:39 | market maker, selling buy models. That's That's how you're using them. You go |
| 1479 | 02:07:39 --> 02:07:43 | back through the range. Okay, back on, baby pips. I thought I was going to |
| 1480 | 02:07:43 --> 02:07:47 | start leading myself into some of these lectures, but not to the degree I ended |
| 1481 | 02:07:47 --> 02:07:51 | up dealing with the paid mentorship. I never intend to teach all that stuff, |
| 1482 | 02:07:51 --> 02:07:55 | but it became fun, revealing more and more and more, and I got addicted to |
| 1483 | 02:07:55 --> 02:07:59 | everybody's astonishment, and I got whipped up in the frenzy of it just fun, |
| 1484 | 02:07:59 --> 02:08:04 | but just know that there's a limit to how far I'm going to go with it all. But |
| 1485 | 02:08:04 --> 02:08:09 | there's a lot more that I'm going to share. But in here, going back from here |
| 1486 | 02:08:09 --> 02:08:12 | to that low I did a lecture on baby pips. It's called trading inside the |
| 1487 | 02:08:12 --> 02:08:19 | range, and I started to teach the beginning elements to some of these |
| 1488 | 02:08:19 --> 02:08:25 | principles. And at the end of that lecture, I actually had anxiety about |
| 1489 | 02:08:25 --> 02:08:31 | having done it, because I didn't feel comfortable revealing it. I just, I |
| 1490 | 02:08:31 --> 02:08:36 | didn't, I didn't feel comfortable doing it. And it took time, you know, putting |
| 1491 | 02:08:36 --> 02:08:39 | my toe in the water to see what would happen if I revealed a little bit more, |
| 1492 | 02:08:39 --> 02:08:44 | and reveal a little bit more, reveal a little bit more. And over the years, you |
| 1493 | 02:08:44 --> 02:08:50 | know it's, it's a lot out there now, but I had to make sure that I have a |
| 1494 | 02:08:50 --> 02:08:55 | language that I can lean on as this is what I'm teaching. This is what I'm |
| 1495 | 02:08:55 --> 02:09:02 | showcasing. This is this is that okay? But there's nothing else out there in |
| 1496 | 02:09:02 --> 02:09:06 | retail that this is what it's replicating or duplicating or borrowing |
| 1497 | 02:09:06 --> 02:09:12 | the logic of. And believe me, $5 million is a nice chunk of change. And if it was |
| 1498 | 02:09:12 --> 02:09:15 | possible to be able to say that this stuff is renamed, rebranded, you know, |
| 1499 | 02:09:16 --> 02:09:21 | called something different, 1000s of you would have came forward with it, and |
| 1500 | 02:09:21 --> 02:09:24 | it's not happened. So there you go. There's your obvious testimony that |
| 1501 | 02:09:24 --> 02:09:27 | anybody that says that are just parroting other people, or they're |
| 1502 | 02:09:27 --> 02:09:30 | trying to sell something, and they're trying to just take the attention and |
| 1503 | 02:09:30 --> 02:09:34 | the momentum around what it is I'm giving to the community because they |
| 1504 | 02:09:34 --> 02:09:38 | want to sell their bullshit. Hey, I understand groceries are expensive, but |
| 1505 | 02:09:38 --> 02:09:43 | you go back through all that range, and you start looking for where it acted as |
| 1506 | 02:09:43 --> 02:09:48 | support, where it was discount, where it sprung price higher like a trampoline. |
| 1507 | 02:09:49 --> 02:09:53 | When you start going down because you're in a cell program, why? Because he has a |
| 1508 | 02:09:53 --> 02:09:58 | change in state of delivery here, everything starts seeking lower prices. |
| 1509 | 02:09:58 --> 02:10:03 | It's not just simply. Well, here's the support. Let's just go there. That's not |
| 1510 | 02:10:03 --> 02:10:09 | that's not enough for me. Because how will you if you're here and you expected |
| 1511 | 02:10:09 --> 02:10:13 | to trade down, it's not going to do that one shot. Can it do it? Sure. Could it? |
| 1512 | 02:10:13 --> 02:10:17 | Could have a big candle, just fall out of bed and go down there. But you won't |
| 1513 | 02:10:17 --> 02:10:20 | be able to trade those kind of environments anyway, just like this kind |
| 1514 | 02:10:20 --> 02:10:24 | of day is, or this kind of individual candlestick, you can't trade the PPI and |
| 1515 | 02:10:24 --> 02:10:28 | CPI number. You can't enter those candlesticks. And many of you probably |
| 1516 | 02:10:28 --> 02:10:32 | are just discovered that you can't even use the paper trading platform on |
| 1517 | 02:10:32 --> 02:10:37 | trading view when you have these big reports, because they're lagging, like |
| 1518 | 02:10:37 --> 02:10:41 | there's there's no you can't even do anything with it. So which is kind of a |
| 1519 | 02:10:41 --> 02:10:44 | good thing, because, you know, that keeps a lot of the fakes out there from |
| 1520 | 02:10:44 --> 02:10:48 | saying, Look, you know, I did 50 contracts on this, on gold, and look |
| 1521 | 02:10:48 --> 02:10:53 | where my fill was. You didn't get filled on that shit. So you go back through all |
| 1522 | 02:10:53 --> 02:10:56 | of this price range, and then you have this gap here. So that's the make |
| 1523 | 02:10:56 --> 02:11:01 | annotation of that one. You have that. And look where the bodies are stopping |
| 1524 | 02:11:01 --> 02:11:05 | in there. See that? Yeah, we go up into that Fairbank because it's there. So |
| 1525 | 02:11:05 --> 02:11:11 | every new array that forms that means any short term high, any bearish up |
| 1526 | 02:11:11 --> 02:11:19 | close candle, which is the order block, any gap, like a fair value gap, all of |
| 1527 | 02:11:19 --> 02:11:24 | them have to be referenced my attention. Every time it forms a new one in the new |
| 1528 | 02:11:24 --> 02:11:32 | cell program, they're most important to me. If they agree and they converge with |
| 1529 | 02:11:32 --> 02:11:36 | something inside of the buy side of the curve, which means, while it was going |
| 1530 | 02:11:36 --> 02:11:40 | up, if it matches, then it's going to be a lot of weight associated with that. |
| 1531 | 02:11:40 --> 02:11:43 | And I expect price to remain heavy. You ever notice when I'm ever notice what |
| 1532 | 02:11:43 --> 02:11:47 | I'm talking about in trades where I'll comment and say, I'll take it out and |
| 1533 | 02:11:47 --> 02:11:52 | say, I want to see speed and distance, or I want to see large range candles. |
| 1534 | 02:11:52 --> 02:11:56 | Those are indications in my mind, because I'm seeing things like this, |
| 1535 | 02:11:56 --> 02:11:59 | where, okay, there's a Fairbank up over here that acted as something bullish. |
| 1536 | 02:11:59 --> 02:12:02 | How do we know that? Because look what it did here, trade down to it here, and |
| 1537 | 02:12:02 --> 02:12:06 | then repel price higher. Okay, that's not support resistance. It's the logic |
| 1538 | 02:12:06 --> 02:12:11 | that that inefficiency stayed open. You see that it didn't complete completely |
| 1539 | 02:12:11 --> 02:12:14 | come down to that candles low, all right? That high, that candle, which is |
| 1540 | 02:12:14 --> 02:12:17 | the low, that fair value, yeah, that's what you want to see if you're going to |
| 1541 | 02:12:17 --> 02:12:20 | try to buy a fair value gap. And then the market's bullish and you're and |
| 1542 | 02:12:20 --> 02:12:22 | you're right, and you're right, and where you think the market's going to |
| 1543 | 02:12:22 --> 02:12:27 | trade to you're buying the fair value gaps high, or something just above the |
| 1544 | 02:12:27 --> 02:12:30 | consequent encroachment, because the likelihood you're getting it consequent |
| 1545 | 02:12:30 --> 02:12:35 | encroachment, or just below and being filled is very small. Can it happen? |
| 1546 | 02:12:35 --> 02:12:39 | Absolutely. If you do, you have one of the best fucking entries, and that's the |
| 1547 | 02:12:39 --> 02:12:43 | one you can go on Instagram, go on Facebook, put advertisements out and say |
| 1548 | 02:12:43 --> 02:12:46 | I'm selling a course. Look at this. I learned this bullshit. That's the ones |
| 1549 | 02:12:46 --> 02:12:51 | everybody wants a dog and pony shit, but it's a steady diet. Even in my own |
| 1550 | 02:12:51 --> 02:12:57 | hands, I don't get those types of fills. So I have to use a very low threshold of |
| 1551 | 02:12:57 --> 02:13:01 | entry. That means I'm going to use the easiest barrier to break through. I'm |
| 1552 | 02:13:01 --> 02:13:05 | going to use the high of a fair value gap that is that's going to act as |
| 1553 | 02:13:05 --> 02:13:10 | support for me. I'm going to buy that discount array at the high of the fair |
| 1554 | 02:13:10 --> 02:13:16 | value gap, or one tick below the highest part of it. And I'm going to try to get |
| 1555 | 02:13:16 --> 02:13:22 | my largest portion on there if it trades to the midpoint of a fair value gap, and |
| 1556 | 02:13:22 --> 02:13:26 | I'm bullish. I'll add on another portion, and I'm not afraid of it. If it |
| 1557 | 02:13:26 --> 02:13:29 | leaves that fair value gap and comes back down one more time, touches the |
| 1558 | 02:13:29 --> 02:13:35 | consequence of encroachment, I will add to that trade again. And if you look at |
| 1559 | 02:13:35 --> 02:13:39 | my trade examples, they're all over on Twitter, the ones that don't have I put |
| 1560 | 02:13:39 --> 02:13:46 | songs in there, because I like, I like, I love music, okay, and the trades that |
| 1561 | 02:13:46 --> 02:13:52 | I'm taking at the time, I like to use a song that I was listening to, and |
| 1562 | 02:13:52 --> 02:13:55 | because I would take the trade and condense it by by speed, because you |
| 1563 | 02:13:55 --> 02:13:58 | only had to have, I think it's like one minute. And something over there on |
| 1564 | 02:13:58 --> 02:14:02 | Twitter used to be that was the timeline I had to or time limit I had on the |
| 1565 | 02:14:02 --> 02:14:08 | videos. I thought I was safe by using the music earlier, but I don't sell |
| 1566 | 02:14:08 --> 02:14:11 | like, engagements earlier. Like, I didn't make money by having people watch |
| 1567 | 02:14:11 --> 02:14:16 | what I do. Like, I didn't monetize that over there, but the artists would |
| 1568 | 02:14:16 --> 02:14:19 | obviously, you know, put copyrights against me, and they take the videos |
| 1569 | 02:14:19 --> 02:14:22 | down. That's why I told everybody. When I was on Twitter, I said, if you like |
| 1570 | 02:14:22 --> 02:14:26 | the if you like these things, download them. Because I was always getting |
| 1571 | 02:14:26 --> 02:14:34 | suspended on Twitter last year and year prior because the artist or the the |
| 1572 | 02:14:34 --> 02:14:39 | management company that holds the rights for their songs, they were making me, or |
| 1573 | 02:14:39 --> 02:14:44 | making Twitter or x now remove the video because it had a song in it. To me, |
| 1574 | 02:14:44 --> 02:14:47 | that's a dick move, because I'm not even monetizing it, like I'm literally giving |
| 1575 | 02:14:47 --> 02:14:52 | the credit to the author of the song, and I'm a fan of it, and it's just me, |
| 1576 | 02:14:52 --> 02:14:57 | just doing something with no money. I'm not making money off of that, but I get |
| 1577 | 02:14:57 --> 02:15:03 | it, I understand, but they are the. Uh, the rights holder or the artist was |
| 1578 | 02:15:03 --> 02:15:06 | having a lot of those videos taken down. I haven't been on Twitter. I haven't |
| 1579 | 02:15:06 --> 02:15:09 | been on x I haven't even logged in. I don't even know what's going on there. I |
| 1580 | 02:15:09 --> 02:15:15 | don't have the account still active or not. But I know last year, I was telling |
| 1581 | 02:15:15 --> 02:15:18 | everybody that they were putting copyrights against me, and they were, |
| 1582 | 02:15:18 --> 02:15:22 | they were literally removing the videos. I wasn't deleting trade execution |
| 1583 | 02:15:22 --> 02:15:25 | videos. I wasn't trying to hide something. I told everybody, download |
| 1584 | 02:15:25 --> 02:15:31 | them so but if you have them, or if you have the ones, that's still up there, if |
| 1585 | 02:15:31 --> 02:15:34 | you look at them, you'll see some of the things I'm talking about here. That's |
| 1586 | 02:15:34 --> 02:15:39 | what I'm using when I'm trading, when I'm pyramiding entries. For instance, |
| 1587 | 02:15:39 --> 02:15:45 | let's just say that I wanted to sell short when we ran above these highs in |
| 1588 | 02:15:45 --> 02:15:49 | here and traded right in there as a bold face bullish candle, selling short right |
| 1589 | 02:15:49 --> 02:15:55 | there that is a turtle suit. Why? Because it's clearing these highs. It's |
| 1590 | 02:15:55 --> 02:15:58 | clearing this high and it's trading into a premium array, and it's been going up |
| 1591 | 02:15:58 --> 02:16:07 | since last week, so it's reasonable to anticipate it, to do what, retrace and |
| 1592 | 02:16:07 --> 02:16:08 | challenge, what |
| 1593 | 02:16:10 --> 02:16:13 | the consequence of that wick? Because it didn't do it here. So we've pushed and |
| 1594 | 02:16:13 --> 02:16:17 | pushed and pushed and pushed pushed. We had two real high impact news drivers |
| 1595 | 02:16:17 --> 02:16:24 | yesterday and today, it's Wednesday pump day we're in here reaching for a market |
| 1596 | 02:16:25 --> 02:16:31 | level that I gave to you yesterday, and we watched it break down. I would not |
| 1597 | 02:16:31 --> 02:16:37 | have been filled on any entry here at all, because I would have had a limit |
| 1598 | 02:16:37 --> 02:16:41 | order right at this candles high, plus one tick that. That's how I would have |
| 1599 | 02:16:41 --> 02:16:46 | used it and it you watch and see me in the live stream here, I'll say I'm |
| 1600 | 02:16:46 --> 02:16:49 | interested. I'm watching this to see if it wants to get up in here. Because I'm |
| 1601 | 02:16:49 --> 02:16:52 | not going to execute today, not not yet. I will be executing in front you want to |
| 1602 | 02:16:52 --> 02:16:56 | see this stuff being pushed on a button. I'm going to do that because I want my |
| 1603 | 02:16:56 --> 02:16:59 | son to see how to enter orders, how to place a stop, when the move to stop. I'm |
| 1604 | 02:16:59 --> 02:17:03 | going to be doing all that stuff. I'm not afraid of that stuff, okay? But I'm |
| 1605 | 02:17:03 --> 02:17:06 | not going to be doing it as a service. I'm not going to be out here doing you |
| 1606 | 02:17:06 --> 02:17:09 | doing a dog and pony show every single day, because every time they can hear |
| 1607 | 02:17:09 --> 02:17:13 | it, has a $5 mentorship is going to duplicate what I'm doing. They're going |
| 1608 | 02:17:13 --> 02:17:17 | to literally say what I'm in my charts doing, and anybody is not watching me in |
| 1609 | 02:17:17 --> 02:17:21 | another world, third world nation. They're going to they're going to be |
| 1610 | 02:17:21 --> 02:17:23 | like this guy, smart, but all they're doing is parroting off of what I'm |
| 1611 | 02:17:23 --> 02:17:27 | doing. So that's why I'll be using the 15 second chart, because even though |
| 1612 | 02:17:27 --> 02:17:31 | there's a the smallest delay in latency between me doing this live and you |
| 1613 | 02:17:31 --> 02:17:37 | getting it, that's the way I'm going to combat that. That's the only way I can |
| 1614 | 02:17:37 --> 02:17:40 | combat it. Because everybody wants to do Clayton copy, everyone that's hot and |
| 1615 | 02:17:40 --> 02:17:45 | popular. And this old man still got some some spikes in this stuff. So everybody |
| 1616 | 02:17:45 --> 02:17:49 | that wants to, you know, rip somebody off, they're doing it mostly off of me, |
| 1617 | 02:17:49 --> 02:17:53 | but you'll see all the entries and stuff. But I have to give you the |
| 1618 | 02:17:53 --> 02:17:58 | foundations, because it's really meant for my son. And then when I start |
| 1619 | 02:17:58 --> 02:18:00 | showing him how to enter the orders, where I put the limit order in, where I |
| 1620 | 02:18:00 --> 02:18:04 | place my stop loss. And yes, it's important to use a stop loss, not like |
| 1621 | 02:18:04 --> 02:18:08 | put a trade on hope it moves around and then put a stop loss on screenshot it |
| 1622 | 02:18:08 --> 02:18:13 | when it's in in profit. No, look at my executions. I'm picking a stop loss, and |
| 1623 | 02:18:13 --> 02:18:18 | look how nice they are. Those stop losses have logic behind them, just like |
| 1624 | 02:18:18 --> 02:18:23 | I'm explaining all these things in here. They have very specific elements that |
| 1625 | 02:18:23 --> 02:18:29 | cannot be explained in a five minute sentence or video. There's so many |
| 1626 | 02:18:29 --> 02:18:32 | supporting things that have to go along with everything that makes these things |
| 1627 | 02:18:32 --> 02:18:37 | work, which is why I tell everybody it's going to be expensive. You want it to be |
| 1628 | 02:18:37 --> 02:18:41 | fast and easy? And I wish there was a way to do that. I wish there was a way |
| 1629 | 02:18:41 --> 02:18:45 | to do that, but you can see that it's not something that is explained right |
| 1630 | 02:18:45 --> 02:18:48 | away in one statement, and you have everything to know about it, and you |
| 1631 | 02:18:48 --> 02:18:52 | don't ever need to revisit or even worry about practicing studying it. You now |
| 1632 | 02:18:52 --> 02:18:55 | know what an order block is, because guess what? It's the opening price, if |
| 1633 | 02:18:55 --> 02:18:58 | it's multiple candles, is fine. The opening price of the up close candles, |
| 1634 | 02:18:58 --> 02:19:01 | that's the change in the state of delivery. They're going to write a book. |
| 1635 | 02:19:01 --> 02:19:04 | They can't trade it. They won't be able won't be able to do it. They won't even |
| 1636 | 02:19:04 --> 02:19:10 | be able to save a live price action and explain to you why it's gonna happen. |
| 1637 | 02:19:10 --> 02:19:13 | But I'm telling you how to do this stuff, so that way, once you learn it |
| 1638 | 02:19:14 --> 02:19:20 | and you digest all the information I'm supplying to you. Because again, I'm not |
| 1639 | 02:19:20 --> 02:19:24 | talking to the guys on Twitter, I'm not talking to guys on Instagram, I'm not |
| 1640 | 02:19:24 --> 02:19:30 | talking to other people on YouTube. I'm talking to my son. So I want him to know |
| 1641 | 02:19:30 --> 02:19:34 | everything. I don't want to say to him. I'm going to give you a condensed |
| 1642 | 02:19:34 --> 02:19:38 | version and filter out a lot of the essential parts. That's really going to |
| 1643 | 02:19:38 --> 02:19:41 | make it easier for you. When you have adversities trying to use it, you're |
| 1644 | 02:19:41 --> 02:19:44 | going to know it like the back of your hand. That's how I teach I'm teaching my |
| 1645 | 02:19:44 --> 02:19:49 | children how to know it like I know it. Everybody out there that has my logo and |
| 1646 | 02:19:49 --> 02:19:52 | their shit and trying to sell the idea that they know how to use this |
| 1647 | 02:19:52 --> 02:19:56 | information. Sometimes they they can use it. Sometimes they can. When they talk |
| 1648 | 02:19:56 --> 02:19:59 | about certain subject matter that I know, they don't know because I haven't |
| 1649 | 02:19:59 --> 02:20:04 | fully. Taught it. That's what gets on my skin. But that's also the reason why I'm |
| 1650 | 02:20:04 --> 02:20:09 | teaching in great lengths, because I'm talking to my children, I want them to |
| 1651 | 02:20:09 --> 02:20:14 | know every aspect. That means, if you listen to the dialog of everything I'm |
| 1652 | 02:20:14 --> 02:20:18 | saying, I'm giving you, what you don't realize is going to be a problem you |
| 1653 | 02:20:18 --> 02:20:22 | don't know yet, because the question didn't come up in your your development |
| 1654 | 02:20:22 --> 02:20:25 | or your testing of it yet. You haven't even messed around with it in live price |
| 1655 | 02:20:25 --> 02:20:29 | action. You haven't, you haven't investigated any of this yet. You're |
| 1656 | 02:20:29 --> 02:20:32 | just hearing me talk about certain things, and you think, Well, I |
| 1657 | 02:20:32 --> 02:20:37 | understand how to do that. No, you don't. You don't know how to do it. You |
| 1658 | 02:20:37 --> 02:20:40 | just know what I said. And that's not the same as going out and being able to |
| 1659 | 02:20:40 --> 02:20:43 | understand how to read it in the new price action. It's a new price action |
| 1660 | 02:20:43 --> 02:20:49 | that's going to form. So when I get questions saying, How do I know what |
| 1661 | 02:20:49 --> 02:20:57 | fair value gap to use? I'm teaching that to you here today. How do I know how to |
| 1662 | 02:20:57 --> 02:21:00 | trade the market maker? So can you talk about market maker? Sell models and buy |
| 1663 | 02:21:00 --> 02:21:07 | models. Everything I talk about is part of that, even if I don't even mention |
| 1664 | 02:21:07 --> 02:21:11 | it. If I never mention those terms, market maker, sell model, market maker, |
| 1665 | 02:21:11 --> 02:21:16 | buy model, every aspect of what I trade off of is part of either a market maker, |
| 1666 | 02:21:16 --> 02:21:20 | sell or market maker, buy model. It's always there, but because when I taught |
| 1667 | 02:21:20 --> 02:21:24 | that lesson. Go into the lectures. Okay? They're on the mentorship videos. Go in |
| 1668 | 02:21:24 --> 02:21:30 | the playlist. Go into the 2017 mentorship. And you'll see me talk about |
| 1669 | 02:21:31 --> 02:21:34 | market maker, buy models and sell models. And then I talk about the buy |
| 1670 | 02:21:34 --> 02:21:39 | side of the curve and I talk about the sell side of the curve. Okay, when the |
| 1671 | 02:21:39 --> 02:21:43 | buy side of the curves unfolding, that means it's buy side delivery. That means |
| 1672 | 02:21:43 --> 02:21:47 | down close candles or fair value gaps that get traded down into should supreme |
| 1673 | 02:21:48 --> 02:21:55 | trampoline push price higher once we turn to a point where it should reverse, |
| 1674 | 02:21:55 --> 02:21:59 | or could reverse, which is, in essence, a turtle suit environment. Turtle suit |
| 1675 | 02:21:59 --> 02:22:05 | is a reversal mechanism. This is a change in a state of delivery turtle |
| 1676 | 02:22:05 --> 02:22:11 | suit, and then you have a turtle soup that is an entry mechanism that's part |
| 1677 | 02:22:11 --> 02:22:17 | of an existing or unfolding sell or buy program. What does that mean? What does |
| 1678 | 02:22:17 --> 02:22:23 | that mean? That means that this is a change in a directional price run that's |
| 1679 | 02:22:23 --> 02:22:30 | going to most likely be sustained for a session or day or longer. The turtle |
| 1680 | 02:22:30 --> 02:22:33 | soup aspect is we're taking out the liquidity above this high and all these |
| 1681 | 02:22:33 --> 02:22:36 | highs here, so the buy stops that's resting in here. For anyone that wants |
| 1682 | 02:22:36 --> 02:22:40 | to go short or be short, if it's not there, it's definitely above there. But |
| 1683 | 02:22:40 --> 02:22:43 | how far? ICT, well, that's the reason why you want to have these new week |
| 1684 | 02:22:43 --> 02:22:48 | opening gaps and New Day opening gaps on your chart, five weeks for new week, |
| 1685 | 02:22:48 --> 02:22:53 | opening gaps, five days for new day, opening gaps. You are welcome, and I |
| 1686 | 02:22:53 --> 02:22:58 | encourage you, if you can organize your chart sufficiently to do more than that, |
| 1687 | 02:22:58 --> 02:23:04 | but as a baseline to start with, you'll see many really, really nice trade |
| 1688 | 02:23:04 --> 02:23:10 | setups using that criteria, five for end dogs, five days for end dogs, basically, |
| 1689 | 02:23:10 --> 02:23:19 | and then five weeks for new coconut gaps, end logs. It doesn't sound right. |
| 1690 | 02:23:20 --> 02:23:25 | End dog sounds cool. It's like, Yeah, well, what's up in dog? Yeah, that's |
| 1691 | 02:23:25 --> 02:23:30 | that's cool. End wall kind of sounds like you walk something wrong with that |
| 1692 | 02:23:30 --> 02:23:34 | guy, something wrong with him, but the information that it gives you, okay, |
| 1693 | 02:23:34 --> 02:23:38 | that information is gold, because it the markets are going to do what with them. |
| 1694 | 02:23:38 --> 02:23:42 | They're going to act as magnets. So if you have one element of turtle suit that |
| 1695 | 02:23:42 --> 02:23:47 | is a change in a state of delivery that causes a directional change that's going |
| 1696 | 02:23:47 --> 02:23:53 | to be sustained, okay, that's a reversal pattern. Then you have turtle soups that |
| 1697 | 02:23:53 --> 02:23:59 | are entry techniques that are part of an existing price run that's still yet to |
| 1698 | 02:23:59 --> 02:24:05 | be completed, meaning that we can look at all the run from here down to this |
| 1699 | 02:24:05 --> 02:24:12 | low here, in anything that sees a short term high pierced, not just by the |
| 1700 | 02:24:12 --> 02:24:23 | wicks, not just by The wicks the bodies. That's why I'm not teaching Linda rash |
| 1701 | 02:24:23 --> 02:24:29 | and Larry Connors turtle suit. This right here is not that pattern either. |
| 1702 | 02:24:30 --> 02:24:36 | Go look at I'll tell you, in a very simplistic way, the book streets marks |
| 1703 | 02:24:36 --> 02:24:39 | has a pattern. There's two of them, there's turtle soup and there's turtle |
| 1704 | 02:24:39 --> 02:24:45 | soup plus one, and all it is is they look for a 20 day high, and if it trades |
| 1705 | 02:24:45 --> 02:24:50 | above a 20 day high, they will fade that and go short. And they have a very short |
| 1706 | 02:24:50 --> 02:24:55 | profit objective. To me, it's infantile. It really doesn't make any sense. But if |
| 1707 | 02:24:55 --> 02:24:58 | we're short term trading, like getting in, getting out, real easy, no brainer |
| 1708 | 02:24:58 --> 02:25:03 | type things, you know it. If it's going to fail at a 20 day higher low. And I |
| 1709 | 02:25:03 --> 02:25:07 | don't trade this folks like I don't trade that pattern, there's got to be |
| 1710 | 02:25:07 --> 02:25:10 | something else. But for that book, that's all they had. And then there's |
| 1711 | 02:25:10 --> 02:25:15 | 2020, days plus one, which is basically the same thing, just one more day. And |
| 1712 | 02:25:15 --> 02:25:19 | reverse it. They look at an old 20 day. What's the lowest low in the last 20 |
| 1713 | 02:25:19 --> 02:25:24 | days? If it goes below that, they're going to buy that. Well, that's not |
| 1714 | 02:25:24 --> 02:25:28 | enough information for me. And just as well as they try to capitalize with the |
| 1715 | 02:25:28 --> 02:25:33 | name, which is really clever, they try to capitalize on the low hit strike rate |
| 1716 | 02:25:33 --> 02:25:37 | of the turtle traders that Richard Dennis trained because he used that 20 |
| 1717 | 02:25:37 --> 02:25:41 | day breakout system, they would buy 20 day highs. And when it was a long term |
| 1718 | 02:25:41 --> 02:25:45 | trend, it would just keep on going, and they would make their money there, but |
| 1719 | 02:25:45 --> 02:25:49 | they had a lot of losing trades that the 20 day high breakout would fail and it |
| 1720 | 02:25:49 --> 02:25:52 | would go back into the range and stop them out. So they had a very, very low |
| 1721 | 02:25:52 --> 02:25:58 | strike rate, if my memory serves me right, it was less than 38% accurate. So |
| 1722 | 02:25:58 --> 02:26:01 | how many? How many times you want to stay with a trading system that has that |
| 1723 | 02:26:01 --> 02:26:05 | low of a success rate, chances are you're not. You all think you're going |
| 1724 | 02:26:05 --> 02:26:05 | to get 198% |
| 1725 | 02:26:07 --> 02:26:10 | all that shit that's not going to happen for your first couple years. You should |
| 1726 | 02:26:10 --> 02:26:15 | be tickled to death if you're less than 50% accurate and you're still |
| 1727 | 02:26:15 --> 02:26:20 | profitable, that's a huge Olympic win, because most people can't even get that. |
| 1728 | 02:26:21 --> 02:26:25 | You can be profitable and have a very low strike rate, but it takes the the |
| 1729 | 02:26:25 --> 02:26:30 | mindset of understanding that it's about making money. It's about staying |
| 1730 | 02:26:30 --> 02:26:34 | solvent. It's about following rules and not blowing the account. But it's so |
| 1731 | 02:26:34 --> 02:26:39 | easy to go on tilt and lose sight of what it is you're trying to do, and lose |
| 1732 | 02:26:39 --> 02:26:43 | sight of these, these building blocks, these stepping stones to Okay, well, |
| 1733 | 02:26:43 --> 02:26:47 | this is, this is what I'm going to use. And if that one transaction fails, it's |
| 1734 | 02:26:47 --> 02:26:50 | okay. I'm going to go back tomorrow, and I'm going to wait for these things to be |
| 1735 | 02:26:50 --> 02:26:55 | there again. And I'm not risking a lot. So Caleb can do every execution when he |
| 1736 | 02:26:55 --> 02:27:00 | starts trading, but he can't risk more than 1% but with turtle soups that are |
| 1737 | 02:27:00 --> 02:27:05 | part of existing price run, not a change in a direction like we have here. You |
| 1738 | 02:27:05 --> 02:27:10 | have turtle suit entry mechanisms for your your your trades. Well, can you |
| 1739 | 02:27:10 --> 02:27:15 | think of one without having to go on to any detail further right at this moment, |
| 1740 | 02:27:15 --> 02:27:18 | I want you to think about it for a second. What did you learn from me thus |
| 1741 | 02:27:18 --> 02:27:23 | far? Maybe in this mentorship this year. Maybe it's in other lectures and things |
| 1742 | 02:27:23 --> 02:27:27 | I've had on the YouTube channel. Maybe I thought about it in Twitter space when I |
| 1743 | 02:27:27 --> 02:27:36 | was on Twitter. What? What? What concept do you think would be an example, one |
| 1744 | 02:27:36 --> 02:27:41 | example, of a turtle soup that's an entry technique in a trade that a |
| 1745 | 02:27:41 --> 02:27:46 | existing trend or momentum or seller buy program is underway. Can you think about |
| 1746 | 02:27:46 --> 02:27:47 | that? What |
| 1747 | 02:27:52 --> 02:27:59 | do you think it is institutional order for |
| 1748 | 02:28:01 --> 02:28:02 | integer? How about that? |
| 1749 | 02:28:04 --> 02:28:11 | We have that in the form of we have an old high here. See that? Why is this |
| 1750 | 02:28:11 --> 02:28:18 | high being utilized anyway? Because it's a fair value gap. Every time I go into a |
| 1751 | 02:28:18 --> 02:28:23 | short on a fair value gap, or if I go long on a fair value gap, my mind is I'm |
| 1752 | 02:28:23 --> 02:28:26 | trading in an efficiency with a mechanism of entering with the turtle |
| 1753 | 02:28:26 --> 02:28:33 | suit. So I'm buying below an old low. So if I'm like, for instance, I didn't take |
| 1754 | 02:28:33 --> 02:28:37 | this trade. So just for full full disclosure, let's say that I was seeing |
| 1755 | 02:28:37 --> 02:28:42 | this at the time. Okay? And I want to take a trade and I want to be a buyer. |
| 1756 | 02:28:42 --> 02:28:51 | I'm going to use this candlestick here, the high. Why am I using that? Remember |
| 1757 | 02:28:52 --> 02:28:58 | what I was talking about earlier. Look at the wick. It's overlapping inside the |
| 1758 | 02:28:58 --> 02:29:01 | top end of that candlestick. That makes that small little I'm gonna have to zoom |
| 1759 | 02:29:01 --> 02:29:01 | in. |
| 1760 | 02:29:11 --> 02:29:16 | I know you guys can zoom in on your YouTube, but I want to really get in |
| 1761 | 02:29:16 --> 02:29:19 | here and kind of give you the brass tacks to this, because if I'm going to |
| 1762 | 02:29:19 --> 02:29:24 | teach I'm gonna teach it, right? So we have this candlestick run up, and then |
| 1763 | 02:29:24 --> 02:29:30 | we have this portion where we opened and traded down. You might look at this and |
| 1764 | 02:29:30 --> 02:29:35 | say, Well, why don't you have this in this? That's something entirely |
| 1765 | 02:29:35 --> 02:29:40 | different. That's a that says, This is a normal run of the mill, ICT, fair value |
| 1766 | 02:29:40 --> 02:29:43 | guy. This is, this is what you get when you watch one video and you think you |
| 1767 | 02:29:43 --> 02:29:48 | know everything about it. You don't just like when I teach a volume imbalance. |
| 1768 | 02:29:48 --> 02:29:53 | Okay, if I teach you to use a volume imbalance when there's a fair value gap |
| 1769 | 02:29:53 --> 02:29:58 | information, that means that there's a, there's a separation between one candle |
| 1770 | 02:29:58 --> 02:30:02 | body and another candles by. Body that is inside of the fair value gap. We |
| 1771 | 02:30:02 --> 02:30:07 | don't have that here, but what do we what do we have? We have an overlapping |
| 1772 | 02:30:07 --> 02:30:11 | of this candle is high. It's all body. And then we open, we trade down. It |
| 1773 | 02:30:11 --> 02:30:15 | overlaps this little portion in here, but there's no wick there. You see that |
| 1774 | 02:30:16 --> 02:30:19 | big telltale sign what's occurring there. |
| 1775 | 02:30:19 --> 02:30:20 | It's flush. And |
| 1776 | 02:30:21 --> 02:30:25 | one little tap down. So and I highlight this. I'm highlighting that you're |
| 1777 | 02:30:25 --> 02:30:28 | thinking, I guarantee you I probably got comments right now, and they're probably |
| 1778 | 02:30:28 --> 02:30:31 | gonna go in there and Delete it now. They use my most recent post on my |
| 1779 | 02:30:31 --> 02:30:35 | community post, you're drawing the fair value you got wrong. No, you're not. You |
| 1780 | 02:30:35 --> 02:30:38 | don't know what the fuck you're talking about. This is how I would classify this |
| 1781 | 02:30:38 --> 02:30:43 | inefficiency. But I have to encapsulate it here, because this is a balanced |
| 1782 | 02:30:43 --> 02:30:47 | price range between this low and that candles high. That is a PDA that you've |
| 1783 | 02:30:47 --> 02:30:50 | never learned before. It's the first time I'm introducing it, just like when |
| 1784 | 02:30:50 --> 02:30:55 | I introduced the inception of the volume imbalance. When there's a gap, the fair |
| 1785 | 02:30:55 --> 02:30:58 | value gap, you have to incorporate that, because that's the real range of that |
| 1786 | 02:30:58 --> 02:31:02 | inefficiency, this inefficiency here. You have to refer to that as well. |
| 1787 | 02:31:04 --> 02:31:08 | Notice it doesn't even get down into that gap low right there, where it was |
| 1788 | 02:31:08 --> 02:31:12 | like this. There's nothing there. It's just a gap that stayed open. Yeah, |
| 1789 | 02:31:12 --> 02:31:16 | wonderful. But that's not the narrative. The narrative is, is you have a balanced |
| 1790 | 02:31:16 --> 02:31:22 | price range here inside of a fair value gap. So that's why the market goes down |
| 1791 | 02:31:22 --> 02:31:25 | to that level there and sends it higher. So in case you were watching it earlier, |
| 1792 | 02:31:25 --> 02:31:30 | explain this because I was in a rant. You were probably thinking, no, this |
| 1793 | 02:31:30 --> 02:31:33 | doesn't make any sense. No, you don't know all the details. This is why you |
| 1794 | 02:31:33 --> 02:31:36 | can't get a five minute trainer. You can't get $1 mentorship mentor telling |
| 1795 | 02:31:36 --> 02:31:40 | you this stuff. They don't know. They don't know. Okay, I promise you, they |
| 1796 | 02:31:40 --> 02:31:44 | don't know if you're not, if you're not learning from me, you're getting watered |
| 1797 | 02:31:44 --> 02:31:48 | down bullshit. You're not getting you're not getting the real details, and it |
| 1798 | 02:31:48 --> 02:31:56 | ain't gonna work for you. So extending that over here, that's what that's the |
| 1799 | 02:31:56 --> 02:32:02 | range. But if you have this candlestick here for that, that gap from here to |
| 1800 | 02:32:02 --> 02:32:09 | here, see that that gap is part of the cell program. It's it's formed as it |
| 1801 | 02:32:09 --> 02:32:13 | dropped. So those are going to always be the most important ones. I'm watching |
| 1802 | 02:32:13 --> 02:32:18 | that because what I'm watching is I want to see, does it converge and agree with |
| 1803 | 02:32:18 --> 02:32:23 | something that's over here that formed as a basis for taking a trade. Okay, |
| 1804 | 02:32:24 --> 02:32:31 | let's say that we did not have this gap again, and say we didn't have this gap. |
| 1805 | 02:32:32 --> 02:32:38 | In this gap, what over here would be in agreement with this six o'clock time? |
| 1806 | 02:32:39 --> 02:32:43 | Remember yesterday at 6pm we have to annotate that either with the new day |
| 1807 | 02:32:43 --> 02:32:47 | opening gap. If there's this distinction between the 5pm closing price and the |
| 1808 | 02:32:47 --> 02:32:52 | 6pm opening price, because there's that one hour gap in in price and trading, |
| 1809 | 02:32:52 --> 02:32:55 | they don't, they don't trade between five and six o'clock. We always annotate |
| 1810 | 02:32:55 --> 02:33:00 | that as a new day opening gap. But if the 5pm closing price or selling price |
| 1811 | 02:33:00 --> 02:33:04 | is the same as the opening price at 6pm all we do is draw a single line, and you |
| 1812 | 02:33:04 --> 02:33:08 | can label whatever you want. If that's all we had there, and we didn't have the |
| 1813 | 02:33:08 --> 02:33:13 | inefficiency in this form of this gap here, and we didn't have that one here, |
| 1814 | 02:33:13 --> 02:33:17 | what? What else would be there? And let's say we didn't have this wick here, |
| 1815 | 02:33:17 --> 02:33:21 | say we didn't have that what else if it was retracing up? What else would I lean |
| 1816 | 02:33:21 --> 02:33:28 | on? I would use this obviously, but it could trade through them. Remember, it |
| 1817 | 02:33:28 --> 02:33:32 | can spike. It can cause candlesticks, like it did here, to have the wicks. |
| 1818 | 02:33:33 --> 02:33:40 | What is it doing? Look to the left. It's part of the buy side of the curve. What |
| 1819 | 02:33:40 --> 02:33:44 | do you see? Don't look at my cursor. I'm not putting my my cursor on it to give |
| 1820 | 02:33:44 --> 02:33:49 | you any help. I want you to try to think about it and tell me what you see. Okay, |
| 1821 | 02:33:49 --> 02:33:58 | obviously I can't see I can't hear you. But isn't this a wick? See that? So what |
| 1822 | 02:33:58 --> 02:34:03 | do you do? It? Wicks like that. Ignore. Oh, it's a doji ICT. You're reinventing |
| 1823 | 02:34:03 --> 02:34:10 | bullshit. Come on, steal Steve Nielsen. Guys, not just Steve Nielsen's the |
| 1824 | 02:34:10 --> 02:34:16 | candlestick. God, puny God. Here's the halfway point of that wick. That's |
| 1825 | 02:34:16 --> 02:34:19 | pretty fucking random, isn't it? It might rate to that as well. And even if |
| 1826 | 02:34:19 --> 02:34:23 | didn't have all these other things. If this candlestick went up and stopped |
| 1827 | 02:34:23 --> 02:34:27 | short of that, that means I absolutely know, with a great deal of confidence |
| 1828 | 02:34:28 --> 02:34:32 | that the next candle, when it opens, I want to trade into the body of this |
| 1829 | 02:34:32 --> 02:34:35 | candle, and as soon as it does that, that's going to be treated as a bare |
| 1830 | 02:34:35 --> 02:34:39 | shorter block, not because it's an up close candle, but I'm trading it because |
| 1831 | 02:34:39 --> 02:34:43 | it's inside of the range of that candlestick. Remember I was telling you |
| 1832 | 02:34:43 --> 02:34:48 | many times in rants, many times on Twitter spaces. I can, I can trade |
| 1833 | 02:34:48 --> 02:34:52 | inside of an order block before anybody else would recognize it as an order |
| 1834 | 02:34:52 --> 02:34:57 | block, or they want to call it a supplier demand zone. I'm trading inside |
| 1835 | 02:34:57 --> 02:35:01 | of the candlestick that will later on be. Obvious in hindsight to someone |
| 1836 | 02:35:01 --> 02:35:06 | else. Oh, that's an order block, but you were entering before the order block. |
| 1837 | 02:35:06 --> 02:35:09 | How do you know how to do the ICT? You're getting all the answers in 2024 |
| 1838 | 02:35:09 --> 02:35:13 | baby. All you gotta do is show up. Just take some fucking notes. All the |
| 1839 | 02:35:13 --> 02:35:18 | information is being disseminated to you like a fire hose. Okay, don't complain |
| 1840 | 02:35:18 --> 02:35:24 | when it rips your fucking face off. Just be thankful you're getting a drink that |
| 1841 | 02:35:24 --> 02:35:28 | wick, that consequent encroachment extended on over here. So how many |
| 1842 | 02:35:28 --> 02:35:34 | things are you seeing converging right there? Lots that tells you that this |
| 1843 | 02:35:34 --> 02:35:38 | retracement here is going to send price lower. That's why I said. I want to see |
| 1844 | 02:35:38 --> 02:35:41 | it now. Go down into go back and listen to the stream. It's going to be there. I |
| 1845 | 02:35:41 --> 02:35:44 | can't change it. We're going to look at it and see if it can reach down to the |
| 1846 | 02:35:44 --> 02:35:50 | lower quadrant. And it gravitates from here down to that. Then what's it do? It |
| 1847 | 02:35:50 --> 02:35:56 | returns back to the midpoint, consequent crochet of that wick. See how that |
| 1848 | 02:35:56 --> 02:36:00 | works. Boom. Oh, this classic Support Resistance. No, it's not, it's not |
| 1849 | 02:36:00 --> 02:36:07 | supply and demand. It's technical science and con Creole. It's technical |
| 1850 | 02:36:07 --> 02:36:12 | science, baby. You know, he's fucking watching these videos. If someone tells |
| 1851 | 02:36:12 --> 02:36:15 | you that, they can tell you what's going to happen in intraday charts, run away |
| 1852 | 02:36:15 --> 02:36:18 | from them. They're a con man. They can't do it. They're not well, what do you do |
| 1853 | 02:36:18 --> 02:36:23 | with us? It's a whole, bunch of us doing it. Market trades out to that and then |
| 1854 | 02:36:23 --> 02:36:26 | trades down to the low and explores below the low, which is what we have |
| 1855 | 02:36:26 --> 02:36:33 | here. Okay. Now with that said, I've exhausted everything to do with the buy |
| 1856 | 02:36:33 --> 02:36:37 | side of the curve over here. Then the rest of it is to simply using the |
| 1857 | 02:36:37 --> 02:36:41 | rejection block and the actual low. Okay, so we went through all the PDA |
| 1858 | 02:36:41 --> 02:36:45 | raise from that high, going backwards inside the range. So that's trading |
| 1859 | 02:36:45 --> 02:36:53 | inside the range. So my question to you is, out of all those things there, which |
| 1860 | 02:36:53 --> 02:36:58 | element is your multiplier? What's the one that you see right now? I'm not |
| 1861 | 02:36:58 --> 02:37:02 | saying that you can go out take a trade with it. It it doesn't mean that you can |
| 1862 | 02:37:02 --> 02:37:06 | go out there right now, in front of the whole world, live stream and do entries |
| 1863 | 02:37:06 --> 02:37:10 | with it. That's that's not realistic for you expect that. I wouldn't expect that |
| 1864 | 02:37:10 --> 02:37:18 | out of you. But which one did you see? Chances are you didn't see all that. You |
| 1865 | 02:37:18 --> 02:37:25 | might have saw one or two, maybe three things. But which one did you easily see |
| 1866 | 02:37:25 --> 02:37:29 | without me making special attention to it, or if you're brand new, out of all |
| 1867 | 02:37:29 --> 02:37:32 | the ones I just described, the one that makes most sense to you right now, |
| 1868 | 02:37:32 --> 02:37:38 | because that's where you start. That's your beginning point. That's the thing |
| 1869 | 02:37:38 --> 02:37:41 | that you look for in price action, and when it's not there, you do nothing |
| 1870 | 02:37:43 --> 02:37:46 | until you get more understanding and more learning, more experience watching |
| 1871 | 02:37:46 --> 02:37:52 | me call this stuff over life price action, then you'll see, oh, I started |
| 1872 | 02:37:52 --> 02:37:56 | with a so and so PD array, and that was where I first started learning. But then |
| 1873 | 02:37:56 --> 02:37:59 | I really fell in love with this particular PD array. I'm leaving it |
| 1874 | 02:37:59 --> 02:38:03 | blank, so that way it gives you the flexibility and allow your personality, |
| 1875 | 02:38:03 --> 02:38:07 | because it's essential for that to be there. I don't want to force you into |
| 1876 | 02:38:07 --> 02:38:11 | this. Is the only way to do it, but Caleb's going to have to learn all these |
| 1877 | 02:38:11 --> 02:38:15 | other ones, in addition to just simply a fair value gap, because it supports |
| 1878 | 02:38:15 --> 02:38:20 | holding on to a trade. ICT, can you talk about how to hold on to a trade? Because |
| 1879 | 02:38:20 --> 02:38:24 | I get shaken out of trades, and I have a target, but I get scared and I get taken |
| 1880 | 02:38:24 --> 02:38:27 | out of it because I close a trade, and then that goes to my target. Well, you |
| 1881 | 02:38:27 --> 02:38:32 | have to know your range up here. Well, if it's going to go lower, where it's |
| 1882 | 02:38:32 --> 02:38:37 | going to go to that lows where sell side. But before we go there, we have |
| 1883 | 02:38:37 --> 02:38:41 | all kinds of opportunities, which is what I just outlined. We don't need it |
| 1884 | 02:38:41 --> 02:38:45 | to go below that low, or even trade to that low to be profitable. Any one of |
| 1885 | 02:38:45 --> 02:38:48 | these PD arrays that we outlined in the rejection block in that low, and in this |
| 1886 | 02:38:48 --> 02:38:51 | consequence, I'm that wick that could have been a partial, that could have |
| 1887 | 02:38:51 --> 02:38:54 | been a terminus for your trade. And guess what? That doesn't mean that |
| 1888 | 02:38:54 --> 02:38:57 | you're stupid. Doesn't mean that you're not good at trading because you didn't |
| 1889 | 02:38:57 --> 02:39:03 | hold for all this run down here. You have to have a starting point like my |
| 1890 | 02:39:03 --> 02:39:03 | son, Caleb, |
| 1891 | 02:39:04 --> 02:39:11 | he has to have some kind of measurable expected range to operate in at around a |
| 1892 | 02:39:11 --> 02:39:17 | specific time of day and do the same things every single day and not worry |
| 1893 | 02:39:17 --> 02:39:21 | about what's going on outside the boundaries and parameters that that |
| 1894 | 02:39:21 --> 02:39:26 | entails, because you're you're always going to find an excuse to feel like you |
| 1895 | 02:39:26 --> 02:39:30 | didn't do enough, you didn't make enough, you didn't get in at the best |
| 1896 | 02:39:30 --> 02:39:34 | price, you didn't hold for the best price, and get out at the best price, |
| 1897 | 02:39:34 --> 02:39:37 | like that. That's something that you're going to be plagued with the rest of |
| 1898 | 02:39:37 --> 02:39:41 | your life. As someone that's been doing this for 30 plus years, I don't like my |
| 1899 | 02:39:41 --> 02:39:46 | exits. I want them to be perfect. I want them to be better than they are. And you |
| 1900 | 02:39:46 --> 02:39:49 | see what I do with my executions of my show, my entry, man, it's a whole show. |
| 1901 | 02:39:50 --> 02:39:55 | You see that it's it's pretty good. And if I can go back in time and say that to |
| 1902 | 02:39:55 --> 02:39:58 | my younger self at 20 some years old, here's how you're gonna know how to |
| 1903 | 02:39:58 --> 02:40:02 | trade later on, I'd be like if i. Can just do that, I'm happy, but that won't |
| 1904 | 02:40:02 --> 02:40:04 | be true when you get to that point, because you're like, I want to go beyond |
| 1905 | 02:40:04 --> 02:40:08 | this. So you're always striving, at least for me, I'm always striving for |
| 1906 | 02:40:08 --> 02:40:11 | perfection, knowing it's going to evade me, but I'm going in the right |
| 1907 | 02:40:11 --> 02:40:17 | direction. I'm not trying to go the other way. I'm trying to refine and make |
| 1908 | 02:40:17 --> 02:40:22 | it better. And usually that's done by doing little, little and less, not more |
| 1909 | 02:40:22 --> 02:40:27 | of the same stuff. It's just doing less of the things that I try to do. And |
| 1910 | 02:40:27 --> 02:40:34 | that's when I don't try to beat my own systems. When I don't do that, I have |
| 1911 | 02:40:34 --> 02:40:38 | the better, the better exits, and when I try to finesse certain things, because, |
| 1912 | 02:40:38 --> 02:40:43 | you know, I think I've woke up on a better side of the bed. I think I'm |
| 1913 | 02:40:43 --> 02:40:49 | gonna really do a stunner today. My exes aren't as fashionable as other times, so |
| 1914 | 02:40:49 --> 02:40:53 | I don't know if that means anything to you, but I just learned that that's what |
| 1915 | 02:40:53 --> 02:40:59 | I've observed in my own my own exits, my own strategies and such. But when the |
| 1916 | 02:40:59 --> 02:41:03 | market creates this fair value got this high right here. Okay, let me take let |
| 1917 | 02:41:03 --> 02:41:09 | me take this off for now. Let me take all this stuff off for now. And what I'm |
| 1918 | 02:41:09 --> 02:41:16 | saying is conceptually, from this candles opening price all the way down |
| 1919 | 02:41:17 --> 02:41:22 | to here, and we'll just use, we'll replicate this is also a targeting |
| 1920 | 02:41:22 --> 02:41:25 | strategy, so you can write this in your notes too. It'll be in the book. Case |
| 1921 | 02:41:25 --> 02:41:29 | you don't fully get it here, because I have a wick. I'm grading that price |
| 1922 | 02:41:29 --> 02:41:35 | swing or that that range, if you will. We have a quadrant. So if we have this, |
| 1923 | 02:41:36 --> 02:41:40 | and it's one quarter of that range, I'm going to ballpark another quarter range |
| 1924 | 02:41:41 --> 02:41:47 | projection lower. And that's a Valerie. I'm trying. I'm looking at this here to |
| 1925 | 02:41:47 --> 02:41:54 | here. Okay, that's what I'm that's what I'm doing right there. And if I want to, |
| 1926 | 02:41:55 --> 02:42:01 | I can do This. That would be negative point two, five. |
| 1927 | 02:42:08 --> 02:42:30 | I'm it, that's pretty good. That's that's pretty close for for Ivana, for |
| 1928 | 02:42:30 --> 02:42:35 | 50 roll with a prescription. Updated my eyeglass. I had my eyeglasses |
| 1929 | 02:42:36 --> 02:42:42 | prescription checked, and I discovered that I have gone up to prescriptions, |
| 1930 | 02:42:42 --> 02:42:47 | and that's the biggest jump I've had with my vision in my whole life. So |
| 1931 | 02:42:48 --> 02:42:54 | that's a little disconcerting, but the the range here that I just projected, |
| 1932 | 02:42:54 --> 02:42:57 | that's a good target, right there. So if we're going to go below this low, how? |
| 1933 | 02:42:57 --> 02:43:04 | How? How can you determine a very low threshold, very easy, low hanging fruit. |
| 1934 | 02:43:04 --> 02:43:09 | Objective, if you want to try to trade for something lower than that low, how |
| 1935 | 02:43:09 --> 02:43:14 | can you do it? Well, what is that low part of is it part of a range like this |
| 1936 | 02:43:14 --> 02:43:20 | wick, or is it part of the range from this high down to that low? If it's |
| 1937 | 02:43:20 --> 02:43:23 | going to go below that for the Express purposes of using the wick for your |
| 1938 | 02:43:23 --> 02:43:27 | target or the range high down to that low, if it's going to go below that low |
| 1939 | 02:43:27 --> 02:43:33 | for seeking liquidity. Okay, let me do this. Okay, we just did that measurement |
| 1940 | 02:43:34 --> 02:43:42 | on that that that anchored right here. We're going to draw this up to that |
| 1941 | 02:43:42 --> 02:43:53 | high, and you can see it's on that low, the same the same aspect of what we were |
| 1942 | 02:43:53 --> 02:43:57 | trying to measure for projections. We can do that same thing with that range |
| 1943 | 02:43:57 --> 02:44:07 | here, and whatever the 20% or 25% or a quarter of that range. Here we can |
| 1944 | 02:44:07 --> 02:44:13 | project lower. That's the lowest threshold. That's the easiest. If it's |
| 1945 | 02:44:13 --> 02:44:18 | going to go below an old low, how far can it go below the old low? And you can |
| 1946 | 02:44:18 --> 02:44:19 | get that measured by one |
| 1947 | 02:44:25 --> 02:44:34 | that. So you have the low of the actual candle, like this. See that that's the |
| 1948 | 02:44:34 --> 02:44:37 | low, that's where we were targeting, and anything below that would be liquidity, |
| 1949 | 02:44:37 --> 02:44:40 | what kind of liquidity, sell side? And if you're using the range, you're going |
| 1950 | 02:44:40 --> 02:44:47 | to be using range targeting. This range is the high to that low, and this is one |
| 1951 | 02:44:47 --> 02:44:52 | quarter of the range projected below that low. That takes us to this level |
| 1952 | 02:44:52 --> 02:44:55 | here, and that's a pretty good target. I mean, you won't get all that, but that's |
| 1953 | 02:44:55 --> 02:44:59 | okay, and that's usually like a if you're not using standard deviations. |
| 1954 | 02:44:59 --> 02:45:04 | Now. Standard deviations are taught in the mentorship videos on the 2017 |
| 1955 | 02:45:05 --> 02:45:09 | mentorship playlists. I don't recall off the top my head, because I'm 52 I'm |
| 1956 | 02:45:09 --> 02:45:12 | having a Biden Amendment right now. When it comes to think about where the |
| 1957 | 02:45:13 --> 02:45:17 | content was per month, I don't recall what that was, because it's been a |
| 1958 | 02:45:17 --> 02:45:22 | little bit of time since then, but where I'm teaching standard deviations. That |
| 1959 | 02:45:22 --> 02:45:26 | is the closest thing that I'm going to reveal to the public on how to get |
| 1960 | 02:45:26 --> 02:45:30 | really, really, really tight precision grouping with your exits that are |
| 1961 | 02:45:30 --> 02:45:34 | closest to the highs and closest to the lows. But if you want something that's |
| 1962 | 02:45:34 --> 02:45:37 | very simple, doesn't take a whole lot of work. It's really off the cuff quick. |
| 1963 | 02:45:37 --> 02:45:41 | It's just what I just showed you here. Okay, if you just rewind this portion |
| 1964 | 02:45:41 --> 02:45:44 | again. It'll make perfect sense to you. The only thing you're doing is trying to |
| 1965 | 02:45:44 --> 02:45:49 | get one quarter of the range beyond the low or high that you're trying to trade |
| 1966 | 02:45:49 --> 02:45:54 | for. So this is what we were aiming for, and that's the excuse for reaching for |
| 1967 | 02:45:54 --> 02:45:58 | something in here or in here and being content with not getting anything beyond |
| 1968 | 02:45:58 --> 02:46:04 | that. And that's going to be a skill set for you to acquire, where I made enough |
| 1969 | 02:46:04 --> 02:46:09 | money, and you have to come to terms with whatever that is. And over time, |
| 1970 | 02:46:09 --> 02:46:13 | you're going to see that that is more than more than plenty. But it won't feel |
| 1971 | 02:46:13 --> 02:46:16 | like that when you're when you're first learning. So back to this through here |
| 1972 | 02:46:16 --> 02:46:20 | for turtle suits that are part of an existing price run. Anytime you're |
| 1973 | 02:46:20 --> 02:46:23 | trading in a fair value gut, you're literally trading in turtle suit. You're |
| 1974 | 02:46:23 --> 02:46:27 | trading above and going short an old high, which is this candle high. So it's |
| 1975 | 02:46:27 --> 02:46:30 | not support and resistance that we're trading. We're trading with the express |
| 1976 | 02:46:30 --> 02:46:39 | purposes that there's an absence of buyers that's been afforded any |
| 1977 | 02:46:39 --> 02:46:42 | opportunity to be a buyer above this candle high. That's essentially what my |
| 1978 | 02:46:42 --> 02:46:48 | fair value got this doing. So let's do this. Let's amplify this again. This is |
| 1979 | 02:46:48 --> 02:46:51 | a little reminder, if you guys are learning today you like this kind of |
| 1980 | 02:46:51 --> 02:46:55 | stuff, because when I when I don't see a lot of thumbs up and I'm teaching stuff |
| 1981 | 02:46:55 --> 02:46:59 | that I never really wanted to teach, it kind of makes me feel like, you know |
| 1982 | 02:46:59 --> 02:47:04 | what, I'm gonna I'm gonna slow my roll, and I'll just not be so forthcoming with |
| 1983 | 02:47:04 --> 02:47:07 | the information, because it doesn't cost you anything to do a thumbs up. But I |
| 1984 | 02:47:07 --> 02:47:12 | like seeing that, because I know if I got 100,000 views on a video, 175,000 |
| 1985 | 02:47:14 --> 02:47:20 | views of a lecture, and I see like 10,000 likes, or 5000 likes or 6000 |
| 1986 | 02:47:21 --> 02:47:24 | likes, to me, it's a little insulting, because I don't need to be here. I could |
| 1987 | 02:47:24 --> 02:47:28 | very easily say, Caleb, fuck these people. I don't like what, what I'm |
| 1988 | 02:47:28 --> 02:47:32 | doing. I don't feel encouraged to do it. It's free, and they're not appreciating |
| 1989 | 02:47:32 --> 02:47:36 | it. And it's kind of like an F you or a middle finger to ICT when it's like |
| 1990 | 02:47:36 --> 02:47:39 | that. That's how I view it. Because you're not going to get this information |
| 1991 | 02:47:39 --> 02:47:42 | from anyone else. They're not going to explain it. They're not going to get |
| 1992 | 02:47:42 --> 02:47:45 | into details. They're not going to give it in a way where you can use it and |
| 1993 | 02:47:45 --> 02:47:48 | know how to do it without me ever teaching it to you again. That's how I'm |
| 1994 | 02:47:48 --> 02:47:53 | teaching it. There's no catch here, okay? But I understand that. It's the |
| 1995 | 02:47:53 --> 02:47:58 | mentality of most people today is, you know, you owe it to me. I don't owe a |
| 1996 | 02:47:58 --> 02:48:02 | fucking thing to anybody but a guy leave me a comment saying, hey, when you say, |
| 1997 | 02:48:02 --> 02:48:05 | Fuck you, we have a lot of students that really like you, and they might think |
| 1998 | 02:48:05 --> 02:48:09 | you're talking to them. In this regard, I am, because if you're watching my |
| 1999 | 02:48:09 --> 02:48:14 | stuff, and I'm pouring my my attention and in time into my son, and I'm making |
| 2000 | 02:48:14 --> 02:48:18 | it available to you, I know it's I know it works. You're watching it unfold live |
| 2001 | 02:48:18 --> 02:48:24 | over the charts. There's nobody else doing that. So if the logic is real and |
| 2002 | 02:48:24 --> 02:48:28 | it's valid, and it repeats over and over again, and I'm telling you the why, that |
| 2003 | 02:48:28 --> 02:48:33 | way you learn how to use it, trust it, and then you can anticipate it, how to |
| 2004 | 02:48:33 --> 02:48:37 | know how to find it on your own. That's what mentorship is. It's not me. I mean, |
| 2005 | 02:48:37 --> 02:48:42 | it's not me out here demonstrating my toys. It's me teaching my son in your |
| 2006 | 02:48:42 --> 02:48:48 | witness. So when he's duplicating these types of things, you were there as he |
| 2007 | 02:48:48 --> 02:48:52 | learned it, how he learned it. There's no secret lessons. I look I'm 52 I'm |
| 2008 | 02:48:52 --> 02:48:56 | running out of energy here, so I'm pouring everything into this. It's not |
| 2009 | 02:48:56 --> 02:49:00 | going to be anything outside of this, because I'm pouring hours and hours, and |
| 2010 | 02:49:00 --> 02:49:05 | I got people complaining your videos are too long. Well, then break it up. Nobody |
| 2011 | 02:49:05 --> 02:49:09 | says you had to sit down and watch it in one setting. That's the problem. You're |
| 2012 | 02:49:09 --> 02:49:13 | trying to rush through it all. But the fair value gap is this. We have one |
| 2013 | 02:49:13 --> 02:49:18 | single pass the shaded area is highlighting this candle to that low |
| 2014 | 02:49:18 --> 02:49:23 | that candle. Okay, I don't care about anything else, except for that. Candle |
| 2015 | 02:49:23 --> 02:49:27 | is low because there's no volume imbalance there. See that? No volume |
| 2016 | 02:49:27 --> 02:49:33 | imbalance. We're part of the cell side of the curve. We're dropping. I want to |
| 2017 | 02:49:33 --> 02:49:39 | see it stay low. I want to see it stay low. So I am only interested in |
| 2018 | 02:49:39 --> 02:49:44 | technically seeing I don't really have that highlight, I'm going to take the |
| 2019 | 02:49:44 --> 02:49:48 | six o'clock price off. So I gotta remember how many steps I do. So I can |
| 2020 | 02:49:48 --> 02:49:55 | do Ctrl Z, it'll put it back, meaning this. So if I take it off, and then I'm |
| 2021 | 02:49:55 --> 02:50:01 | going to add the midline on this. So that's how you do that. I'll make it |
| 2022 | 02:50:01 --> 02:50:07 | black because I want to make it pop on the chart. So all things being equal. No |
| 2023 | 02:50:07 --> 02:50:13 | WIC discussion is just this fair value got what we're talking about is it's |
| 2024 | 02:50:13 --> 02:50:17 | part of a sell side delivery. It's part of a sell program. The market's reaching |
| 2025 | 02:50:17 --> 02:50:24 | lower for sell side or a discount inefficiency. I took your attention to |
| 2026 | 02:50:24 --> 02:50:31 | the midpoint of that 830 cat, which is here. I forgot to change the color. So |
| 2027 | 02:50:34 --> 02:50:38 | if it's going to trade up into this inefficiency where only one candle |
| 2028 | 02:50:38 --> 02:50:44 | passed, so between this candles high, and that candle is low, it only went |
| 2029 | 02:50:44 --> 02:50:51 | down one time in one candle for one minute. That's inefficient with buy |
| 2030 | 02:50:51 --> 02:50:59 | side. Buy side is where price is offered going up. Buy side liquidity is where |
| 2031 | 02:50:59 --> 02:51:05 | it's reaching for while it goes up, see buy side liquidity. Are actual pending |
| 2032 | 02:51:05 --> 02:51:10 | orders in the marketplace, either to buy into a new long position or to buy and |
| 2033 | 02:51:10 --> 02:51:16 | exit a short position as a stop loss being activated. I'm looking at that |
| 2034 | 02:51:16 --> 02:51:21 | high right there, and I want to be a short seller generally on the favorite |
| 2035 | 02:51:21 --> 02:51:27 | gap. I'm trying to put my limit order at that price or one tick above it. That's |
| 2036 | 02:51:27 --> 02:51:34 | my first six contracts. That's my model. And then if it can trade up into the |
| 2037 | 02:51:34 --> 02:51:38 | midpoint, or as it starts to slide towards it, then I'll throw in my four |
| 2038 | 02:51:38 --> 02:51:43 | contracts. So what does that give me? Four lots. That gives me a total |
| 2039 | 02:51:43 --> 02:51:49 | position so far, scaling in 10 contracts. I am not inviting you to |
| 2040 | 02:51:49 --> 02:51:53 | trade with 10 contracts. I'm not saying that you have to trade with 10 contracts |
| 2041 | 02:51:53 --> 02:51:58 | for it to be profitable. You should only be watching price action Caleb and |
| 2042 | 02:51:58 --> 02:52:01 | saying, Okay, this is where we're eyeballing it. And saying, I want to see |
| 2043 | 02:52:01 --> 02:52:05 | how it behaves once it trades there. Does it go all the way to the midpoint? |
| 2044 | 02:52:06 --> 02:52:10 | Does it go all the way to the top? This is permissible. Remember that term. It's |
| 2045 | 02:52:10 --> 02:52:15 | something that is allowed to happen, and it doesn't change the underlying |
| 2046 | 02:52:15 --> 02:52:18 | direction or where the mark is going to go. It just means that this is possible |
| 2047 | 02:52:18 --> 02:52:26 | to happen. It doesn't change anything. It's better. It's much better. If it |
| 2048 | 02:52:26 --> 02:52:30 | only goes to half or less, and then does this because that means it's really, |
| 2049 | 02:52:30 --> 02:52:34 | really weak, but because I already expected to go lower, this is just an |
| 2050 | 02:52:34 --> 02:52:38 | opportunity for the market to reprice to that level right there. That candles |
| 2051 | 02:52:38 --> 02:52:44 | low. It doesn't reduce the the the effectiveness of the trade. It doesn't |
| 2052 | 02:52:44 --> 02:52:48 | make it more profitable or less profitable. It just gives me as a |
| 2053 | 02:52:48 --> 02:52:54 | emotional and psychological comfort that I am on side. It's going to start really |
| 2054 | 02:52:54 --> 02:53:01 | running away quickly after it rolls out of here and doesn't go in the upper |
| 2055 | 02:53:01 --> 02:53:08 | half, so meaning this, if it's like this portion, like, say it's like that much |
| 2056 | 02:53:08 --> 02:53:14 | of the gap doesn't get traded to and say this wick only went up, like to here, |
| 2057 | 02:53:15 --> 02:53:19 | but left all that shaded area open and not touched that that high, And then it |
| 2058 | 02:53:19 --> 02:53:25 | did this price action here. That's usually if you watch my examples, and |
| 2059 | 02:53:25 --> 02:53:27 | you'll see me talking about it in real price action when we get through the |
| 2060 | 02:53:27 --> 02:53:32 | August content, and then we start looking at minute by minute, second by |
| 2061 | 02:53:32 --> 02:53:36 | second candlestick, and then what you're observing Caleb, what to anticipate, |
| 2062 | 02:53:36 --> 02:53:40 | what it should do right now, not the overall grand scheme of how the reprice |
| 2063 | 02:53:40 --> 02:53:43 | and where it's going to go and how to go and how to behave in those ranges. |
| 2064 | 02:53:43 --> 02:53:46 | That's what we're doing right here. This is the beginning point, and it's not a |
| 2065 | 02:53:46 --> 02:53:50 | one module lecture, it's there's a lot of clearly, as you can see, there's a |
| 2066 | 02:53:50 --> 02:53:55 | lot of things that you need to weigh out if you really want to know what price is |
| 2067 | 02:53:55 --> 02:53:59 | doing, how to trust that you're going to be a part of a trade and hold on to a |
| 2068 | 02:53:59 --> 02:54:04 | trade. I've answered so many questions already in this lecture that have been |
| 2069 | 02:54:04 --> 02:54:10 | brought to me over the years constantly. But you want? I want, if I'm shorting a |
| 2070 | 02:54:10 --> 02:54:16 | fair value gap, I want to enter at that old candle high and by, by the very |
| 2071 | 02:54:16 --> 02:54:19 | nature of it, that's a turtle suit. You're going short above that high. |
| 2072 | 02:54:20 --> 02:54:23 | You're trading in an area of inefficiency. |
| 2073 | 02:54:25 --> 02:54:31 | And you think this is turtle soup. You think it's this. This is dollar |
| 2074 | 02:54:31 --> 02:54:36 | mentorship menu memberships, where they they're trying to teach you this stuff, |
| 2075 | 02:54:36 --> 02:54:44 | the wish version. Why? Gotta go there. I should see why guys start some trouble. |
| 2076 | 02:54:45 --> 02:54:48 | You're always trying to bring a ruckus. No, I'm trying to remind these cats that |
| 2077 | 02:54:48 --> 02:54:51 | they don't know shit, and they're pretending that they do, and they're |
| 2078 | 02:54:51 --> 02:54:55 | hurting people. You're messing up people's expectations and understanding, |
| 2079 | 02:54:55 --> 02:54:58 | and they're actually prolonging their their learning curve, because they got |
| 2080 | 02:54:58 --> 02:55:02 | to learn that horseshit first and. You realize that they just watered down |
| 2081 | 02:55:02 --> 02:55:05 | something and taught it incorrectly. And they come back to me, and then they're |
| 2082 | 02:55:05 --> 02:55:09 | like, oh, man, I wish I would have just started with you, right. Whatever you |
| 2083 | 02:55:09 --> 02:55:14 | can go you eat where you want to eat, but you think this is turtle sea, just a |
| 2084 | 02:55:14 --> 02:55:28 | high Pierce above it. And then there it is. But that is true here. That's a |
| 2085 | 02:55:28 --> 02:55:34 | breaker. Breakers tend to be turtle soups in changing directional, sustained |
| 2086 | 02:55:34 --> 02:55:41 | price runs where you have high, low, higher, high, there's your breaker, but |
| 2087 | 02:55:41 --> 02:55:46 | the essence is a turtle suit that is not what's going on when you're using as a |
| 2088 | 02:55:46 --> 02:55:50 | trade entry that's part of an existing or underlying or unfolding sell program |
| 2089 | 02:55:50 --> 02:55:55 | or buy program. Because you're looking at one single candle like this, and you |
| 2090 | 02:55:55 --> 02:56:01 | have to get above that candle. Where can it How far can it go? See, it's going to |
| 2091 | 02:56:01 --> 02:56:07 | be harder for you to do these entries here, because as it's going up like |
| 2092 | 02:56:07 --> 02:56:12 | that, you're not going to want to stand in front of that. It takes more |
| 2093 | 02:56:12 --> 02:56:15 | experience learning the things I told you this level yesterday, and they |
| 2094 | 02:56:15 --> 02:56:19 | probably didn't want to be some of you are just looking at this one, or you |
| 2095 | 02:56:19 --> 02:56:22 | didn't watch the entire video yesterday. You heard me talk about other things, |
| 2096 | 02:56:22 --> 02:56:25 | and you're like, Okay, he's done teaching. I'm not everything I said |
| 2097 | 02:56:25 --> 02:56:30 | yesterday was valuable. You might not see the value in it now, because you |
| 2098 | 02:56:30 --> 02:56:35 | have a myopic perspective. But these, these levels, were given to you |
| 2099 | 02:56:35 --> 02:56:42 | yesterday, and the market goes up into it, trades to it and then rejects it. It |
| 2100 | 02:56:42 --> 02:56:48 | takes a whole lot more understanding and a whole lot more complimentary |
| 2101 | 02:56:48 --> 02:56:52 | understanding with other PD arrays to do these types of trades selling right |
| 2102 | 02:56:52 --> 02:56:56 | there. And you've watched me do examples of that. It's on Twitter. Go look at it. |
| 2103 | 02:56:56 --> 02:57:01 | There's examples of it on my YouTube channel too. Look in the executions live |
| 2104 | 02:57:01 --> 02:57:08 | execution playlist. You'll see it. It's there. But these are the more advanced |
| 2105 | 02:57:08 --> 02:57:14 | ones. These are very, very demanding in your understanding the fair value gap, |
| 2106 | 02:57:14 --> 02:57:18 | which many of you are real custom to. Now you're comfortable with it. What you |
| 2107 | 02:57:18 --> 02:57:21 | don't realize is you're doing the same thing here, |
| 2108 | 02:57:23 --> 02:57:25 | that high is here, |
| 2109 | 02:57:27 --> 02:57:32 | this high is here. The difference is, is this is a visual aid. I'm telling you |
| 2110 | 02:57:32 --> 02:57:37 | how far this part of this run above this old high here, which is this individual |
| 2111 | 02:57:37 --> 02:57:45 | candlestick? How far can it go? ICT, where's too far, too far is going above |
| 2112 | 02:57:45 --> 02:57:47 | this candle high. That's a stop loss |
| 2113 | 02:57:48 --> 02:57:54 | entry here, stop loss here. Now, |
| 2114 | 02:57:55 --> 02:58:02 | that's the baseline entry strategy and where stop loss would be. Take it one |
| 2115 | 02:58:02 --> 02:58:07 | step further. How can we take this to an amplified, advanced ICT mentorship |
| 2116 | 02:58:07 --> 02:58:12 | video? This is a charter level content. This whole video is really this whole |
| 2117 | 02:58:12 --> 02:58:15 | stream is a charter level. My charter students are fucking tickled to death |
| 2118 | 02:58:15 --> 02:58:18 | right now. They're like, Man, this is the shit, man. We've been waiting since |
| 2119 | 02:58:18 --> 02:58:22 | 2016 there he is out there now doing it. Oh, man, they love it. You should see |
| 2120 | 02:58:22 --> 02:58:33 | some of the shit they're saying. What do we have here? What is that? Me, move |
| 2121 | 02:58:33 --> 02:58:43 | this. Otherwise you can see what's this part right here? Isn't that a wick? Oh, |
| 2122 | 02:58:44 --> 02:58:49 | well, let's use that information, because that candle is the high end of |
| 2123 | 02:58:49 --> 02:58:53 | the the fair value gap pattern is three candles. It's this one that's candle |
| 2124 | 02:58:53 --> 02:58:58 | one, here's candle two, and candle three, a fair value gap. The |
| 2125 | 02:58:58 --> 02:59:03 | inefficiency is always candle number two, if it's a down closed candle, it's |
| 2126 | 02:59:03 --> 02:59:09 | a sell side imbalance, buy side inefficiency, s i, b i City. If it's a |
| 2127 | 02:59:09 --> 02:59:14 | fair value gap that has an up close candle, it is a buy side imbalance, sell |
| 2128 | 02:59:14 --> 02:59:22 | side inefficiency, or a busy B, i, s i, candle number one. If candle number one |
| 2129 | 02:59:22 --> 02:59:31 | has a wick right here underneath it, that is a premium array. That means it's |
| 2130 | 02:59:31 --> 02:59:35 | below. I'm gonna start it's above the fair value gap, and it's trading up to |
| 2131 | 02:59:35 --> 02:59:38 | here. You're thinking, I'm gonna get into a trade here or at the midpoint. |
| 2132 | 02:59:38 --> 02:59:42 | And you want to see the upper half of that stay open. That's this area right |
| 2133 | 02:59:42 --> 02:59:49 | here. Classic fair value gap, the where you start Caleb, when you're studying |
| 2134 | 02:59:49 --> 02:59:53 | this, you want to be observing price action, and you don't want to see it |
| 2135 | 02:59:53 --> 02:59:58 | trade to this high right here. Okay, in other words, this is what it looks like. |
| 2136 | 02:59:58 --> 02:59:59 | This is the framework so. |
| 2137 | 03:00:00 --> 03:00:08 | ICT: You can have screenshots of it. So nice to you. This is stuff I did not |
| 2138 | 03:00:08 --> 03:00:13 | want to teach. I did not want to teach it. You're an asshole. You should have |
| 2139 | 03:00:13 --> 03:00:20 | want to teach this. No, it's too good. You think you you think you you think |
| 2140 | 03:00:20 --> 03:00:23 | you like this stuff. You ought to see the stuff that I'm never going to teach. |
| 2141 | 03:00:23 --> 03:00:33 | It makes me All right. So we're going to do top right. Seems like it's probably |
| 2142 | 03:00:33 --> 03:00:42 | going to be too much. That's good. So stop loss is here, and the entry would |
| 2143 | 03:00:42 --> 03:00:48 | be here. So you're going to watch this level. Caleb, this is your entry. |
| 2144 | 03:00:51 --> 03:00:52 | Thicken it up a little |
| 2145 | 03:01:02 --> 03:01:12 | bit. Let's will make that this color, man, this is a long video. Go watch |
| 2146 | 03:01:12 --> 03:01:17 | somebody else. I'm here teaching my son how to be profitable and how to read |
| 2147 | 03:01:17 --> 03:01:22 | price action. You don't want to be here for that. Go do something else. So |
| 2148 | 03:01:22 --> 03:01:29 | entries here, stop loss is here. That's that's the methodology, okay, advanced |
| 2149 | 03:01:29 --> 03:01:38 | version, okay. How do you mitigate underlying risk? How do you reduce risk? |
| 2150 | 03:01:38 --> 03:01:43 | How can you use smaller stop losses. How can you make your stop loss really tight |
| 2151 | 03:01:43 --> 03:01:46 | like this? How do you know that these stop losses aren't going to get hit? How |
| 2152 | 03:01:46 --> 03:01:53 | do you know, ICT, when you're holding the dude, bro, the stop loss has me in |
| 2153 | 03:01:53 --> 03:01:57 | tears. Oh, I'm dead. The Stop Loss killed me. That's all the comments when |
| 2154 | 03:01:57 --> 03:02:01 | I'm sharing examples, when you see me using the stop loss placement. I'm going |
| 2155 | 03:02:01 --> 03:02:05 | to show you one element to sometimes, not all times, a lot of things that go |
| 2156 | 03:02:05 --> 03:02:08 | on based on individual trades. But initially, Caleb, when you're watching |
| 2157 | 03:02:08 --> 03:02:12 | prices, not taking trades, you're watching it enter. You're thinking, |
| 2158 | 03:02:12 --> 03:02:16 | Okay, I want to see it how it behaves here. If it goes there, I'm expecting it |
| 2159 | 03:02:16 --> 03:02:21 | to go halfway, no more, but leave a portion open. But if it goes up there, |
| 2160 | 03:02:21 --> 03:02:27 | then you demand immediate response where it needs to drop. Okay, if it doesn't |
| 2161 | 03:02:27 --> 03:02:32 | completely come back to this, candles low, and it leaves a portion of that |
| 2162 | 03:02:32 --> 03:02:38 | open, that's what you want. And then you anticipate very fast speed and big, |
| 2163 | 03:02:38 --> 03:02:43 | large range, candles going lower after it trades to that, candles low, |
| 2164 | 03:02:49 --> 03:02:55 | like that. Once it does that, then you absolutely demand immediate response. |
| 2165 | 03:02:55 --> 03:03:00 | And the same thing happens in my videos. You'll see me say, I want to see speed |
| 2166 | 03:03:00 --> 03:03:06 | and distance in large ranges going down. And then you get it that's qualifying |
| 2167 | 03:03:06 --> 03:03:10 | and quantifying the setup real time. As it happens, you need to be doing those |
| 2168 | 03:03:10 --> 03:03:15 | things while watching price, not entering a demo, not entering a demo, |
| 2169 | 03:03:15 --> 03:03:19 | not pushing any buttons. You do this for months. You observe and you watch, and |
| 2170 | 03:03:19 --> 03:03:22 | it teaches you and trains you to see, oh, yeah, this is what it looks like. |
| 2171 | 03:03:22 --> 03:03:27 | It's going to behave this way. And then when you start using the elements I'm |
| 2172 | 03:03:27 --> 03:03:34 | showing you here, you start with this price level plus one tick. If it can |
| 2173 | 03:03:34 --> 03:03:37 | trade there, that means it's got to go two ticks above that if it books that |
| 2174 | 03:03:37 --> 03:03:41 | price. You hypothetically say you would be in a move, but you're not, you're not |
| 2175 | 03:03:41 --> 03:03:46 | even demoing it. You're tape reading, okay? You're watching and observing, and |
| 2176 | 03:03:46 --> 03:03:50 | then at that point, once it does that, hypothetically, you would be in a trade |
| 2177 | 03:03:50 --> 03:03:55 | whether demo or live using that logic. So you do not want to see it. Book that. |
| 2178 | 03:03:55 --> 03:04:00 | Candles price high. But what happens if this is a little too rich for you? You |
| 2179 | 03:04:00 --> 03:04:04 | don't like that. It's too much range. How can you reduce it? Well, if you have |
| 2180 | 03:04:04 --> 03:04:09 | this candlestick number one in your fair value gap, if it has a wick like this, |
| 2181 | 03:04:09 --> 03:04:13 | this is a premium array, because it's going to be trading up to it. You don't |
| 2182 | 03:04:13 --> 03:04:16 | want to see it trade there. But you can take that wick and do this. You |
| 2183 | 03:04:43 --> 03:04:51 | there's consequence, encouragement. That wick plus two ticks, there you go. The |
| 2184 | 03:04:52 --> 03:04:55 | market will run up here at one point, this will be a bold face bullish candle. |
| 2185 | 03:04:56 --> 03:05:02 | You'll shit yourself, okay, you'll be scared some. You watch my life, examples |
| 2186 | 03:05:02 --> 03:05:05 | of trading, and you watch it, and you're thinking, oh, man, it's gonna be stopped |
| 2187 | 03:05:05 --> 03:05:09 | out. And then all of a sudden, it doesn't How do I know that I'm doing |
| 2188 | 03:05:09 --> 03:05:14 | things like this? But you don't want to hear me. You don't want to learn because |
| 2189 | 03:05:14 --> 03:05:18 | you want a little video, something that tickles your ass and and gives you, |
| 2190 | 03:05:18 --> 03:05:22 | right now, little thing, talking points, you can go around and start talking like |
| 2191 | 03:05:22 --> 03:05:26 | you know something when you don't. I want you to know it. I want you to |
| 2192 | 03:05:26 --> 03:05:33 | understand it. So by examples of things like this, it affords you better |
| 2193 | 03:05:33 --> 03:05:39 | efficient stop loss placement. You don't you're not fearful. Why would I Why |
| 2194 | 03:05:39 --> 03:05:43 | would I fear this never being hit, because it's two ticks above the |
| 2195 | 03:05:43 --> 03:05:50 | midpoint of this. This candle opens and trades down. Isn't this overlapping? |
| 2196 | 03:05:50 --> 03:05:55 | That candles low when it does this. So essentially, what is this area here? |
| 2197 | 03:05:55 --> 03:06:03 | It's a balanced price range. Balance price ranges. We don't ever want to see |
| 2198 | 03:06:03 --> 03:06:06 | it go down, start here, go back over, and then come all the way back to the |
| 2199 | 03:06:06 --> 03:06:09 | top. If it does that, it's probably going to go higher. And I don't want to |
| 2200 | 03:06:09 --> 03:06:13 | be in that trade, so I don't need to put a stop loss up there. I can be just |
| 2201 | 03:06:13 --> 03:06:17 | above the consequent crochet of that wick, because it's a gap, just like this |
| 2202 | 03:06:17 --> 03:06:23 | is a gap. Okay? So anyway, that's the business there. So now taught you how to |
| 2203 | 03:06:23 --> 03:06:27 | trade and how to enter a trade stop loss, and how to also use a very, very |
| 2204 | 03:06:27 --> 03:06:30 | small stop loss. I've also taught you today how to anticipate when the |
| 2205 | 03:06:30 --> 03:06:34 | market's going to run and be aggressive and start creating large range candles. |
| 2206 | 03:06:34 --> 03:06:36 | There's only two circumstances that caused that. I taught you both of them |
| 2207 | 03:06:36 --> 03:06:41 | today, when you leave a gap opening, or if it closes the gap, if you leave a gap |
| 2208 | 03:06:41 --> 03:06:44 | opening, and it's the upper half when you're bearish, or the lower half when |
| 2209 | 03:06:44 --> 03:06:49 | you're buying, once it leaves it, it needs to accelerate move away, and |
| 2210 | 03:06:50 --> 03:06:53 | that's true. But if it goes up and fills the gap in entirely, like it does there, |
| 2211 | 03:06:55 --> 03:07:01 | it must immediately give you speed and distance in large range. Candles are |
| 2212 | 03:07:01 --> 03:07:05 | moving away from it, and then once it takes out this low here, that's now |
| 2213 | 03:07:05 --> 03:07:09 | we're in a new range low. And put more data on the chart. |
| 2214 | 03:07:15 --> 03:07:18 | You're learning some shit today, ain't you? Man, I wish you were taught like |
| 2215 | 03:07:18 --> 03:07:21 | this first time. ICT see they can't be happy. They'll never going to be |
| 2216 | 03:07:21 --> 03:07:24 | satisfied. Instead of saying thank you for teaching it, they're going to say, I |
| 2217 | 03:07:24 --> 03:07:32 | wish you would have taught like this the first time you're a dick. Get away with |
| 2218 | 03:07:32 --> 03:07:36 | some of these guys. So anyway, we were looking for this level here. We had the |
| 2219 | 03:07:36 --> 03:07:40 | response as we were looking for it, and traded off here once it takes out that |
| 2220 | 03:07:40 --> 03:07:46 | low. If you see that happening in your mind, Caleb, you would say partial |
| 2221 | 03:07:46 --> 03:07:50 | there, even if you had single contract, partial there, and you screenshot it as |
| 2222 | 03:07:50 --> 03:07:54 | it trades below that. And then you watch and observe, how does it behave? How |
| 2223 | 03:07:54 --> 03:08:00 | does it behave? Goes up one more time, bumps into it and drops away, comes back |
| 2224 | 03:08:00 --> 03:08:03 | one more time. I gave you the order block here. I said, we do not want to |
| 2225 | 03:08:03 --> 03:08:06 | see it trade above. Go back and watch the live stream. I know you can't rewind |
| 2226 | 03:08:06 --> 03:08:09 | it right now, and I'm not going to change that, because when my son's |
| 2227 | 03:08:09 --> 03:08:13 | watching live data, I don't want him to be able to rewind or change anything. He |
| 2228 | 03:08:13 --> 03:08:17 | has to see it as it's happening. And if he isn't watching and paying attention |
| 2229 | 03:08:17 --> 03:08:21 | at the time it's happening, he's fucking missed it, just like you you've missed |
| 2230 | 03:08:21 --> 03:08:24 | it. You've missed the opportunity. You've missed the opportunity to study |
| 2231 | 03:08:24 --> 03:08:29 | real time. It is what it is. There is no DDR advantages here. This is the way it |
| 2232 | 03:08:29 --> 03:08:32 | is. You don't like it. Go watch somebody else. I'm not in here trying to make |
| 2233 | 03:08:32 --> 03:08:36 | everybody happy. I'm here training my son. This is what it is, but he's in the |
| 2234 | 03:08:36 --> 03:08:40 | fucking dungeon now. So this candlestick, I told you, that's a fair |
| 2235 | 03:08:40 --> 03:08:43 | shorter block. We have a fair value out there. I don't want to see it trade |
| 2236 | 03:08:43 --> 03:08:45 | above it. We already outlined and showed you |
| 2237 | 03:08:51 --> 03:08:59 | it didn't do it. See that. So if you were going to trade the order block, say |
| 2238 | 03:09:00 --> 03:09:04 | that was going to be your methodology, and you were using that here. Okay, |
| 2239 | 03:09:06 --> 03:09:15 | where would your stop loss be? This is a real challenging question for some of |
| 2240 | 03:09:15 --> 03:09:19 | you that haven't taken notes today, for those that have been taking notes, this |
| 2241 | 03:09:19 --> 03:09:24 | is a pretty easy one, if you're looking at this bearish order block, okay, it's |
| 2242 | 03:09:24 --> 03:09:30 | part of the run that's going lower. Okay, this is the midpoint of that wick |
| 2243 | 03:09:30 --> 03:09:35 | at 830 scandal, we are exploring the likelihood of it trading lower. We're |
| 2244 | 03:09:35 --> 03:09:39 | part of a sell program. That means it's going to most likely continue dropping |
| 2245 | 03:09:39 --> 03:09:43 | lower. Okay, so it's only coming back to that midpoint to do what offer fair |
| 2246 | 03:09:43 --> 03:09:50 | value. So if it leaves it like it does here, it starts to trade back up that |
| 2247 | 03:09:50 --> 03:09:54 | right there is your bearish order block. This is where the algorithm gives little |
| 2248 | 03:09:55 --> 03:10:01 | like a mile marker, like a bullet point, or an exit ramp or. A traffic control |
| 2249 | 03:10:01 --> 03:10:08 | device, if you're a professional driver, a notation, if you will. This is where |
| 2250 | 03:10:08 --> 03:10:16 | your eye should go to, okay, and that range gives you the levels to trade on. |
| 2251 | 03:10:16 --> 03:10:21 | If you have not been a participant on the trade yet, you can use this up close |
| 2252 | 03:10:21 --> 03:10:26 | candle to formulate an entry. But where does your stop go? It needs to be above |
| 2253 | 03:10:26 --> 03:10:32 | this candle. Okay, it needs to be above it. But where, where? Where's it got to |
| 2254 | 03:10:32 --> 03:10:39 | go? Some of your young I'll give you 10 seconds more for the ones. They're still |
| 2255 | 03:10:39 --> 03:10:42 | thinking about it. I |
| 2256 | 03:10:48 --> 03:10:55 | I'm having fun today. I might go till five o'clock. I'm gonna be I'm gonna be |
| 2257 | 03:10:55 --> 03:11:01 | divorced. My boss is gonna fire me. I'm trying to watch you, listening to you, |
| 2258 | 03:11:01 --> 03:11:05 | and he's gonna look at what I'm doing. It's not my fault, bro. All right. So |
| 2259 | 03:11:05 --> 03:11:13 | anyway, you probably already noticed we have this premium wick. It goes above as |
| 2260 | 03:11:13 --> 03:11:20 | the next candle above that bear shorter block, your stop would be right here, |
| 2261 | 03:11:20 --> 03:11:25 | plus one tick. That means you're safe. You're you're inside of the realm of |
| 2262 | 03:11:25 --> 03:11:29 | staying within the context of the cell program. You're above the fair, I'm |
| 2263 | 03:11:29 --> 03:11:33 | sorry, you're above the bare shorter block, and you're encapsulating it based |
| 2264 | 03:11:33 --> 03:11:38 | on the wick, because the wick can be if with this like this. Okay, there are |
| 2265 | 03:11:38 --> 03:11:44 | times where you will see this formation of a closed camera, and it drops, and |
| 2266 | 03:11:44 --> 03:11:49 | then it'll spike through. And if it does spike through, and there's a wick, what |
| 2267 | 03:11:49 --> 03:11:53 | it does is it's going right up into half of that wick or just falling short of |
| 2268 | 03:11:53 --> 03:11:57 | it. Then if you got stopped out, that's when I'm gonna go right back in again. |
| 2269 | 03:12:00 --> 03:12:03 | If I missed something down here and I'm seeing price as it's trading up into |
| 2270 | 03:12:03 --> 03:12:09 | that wick. Okay, I'm going to be short there, trusting that this was the order |
| 2271 | 03:12:09 --> 03:12:12 | block, and this is where the damage is being done. Don't think for a second. |
| 2272 | 03:12:12 --> 03:12:16 | The order blocks are always going to be protected. They're not always protected. |
| 2273 | 03:12:16 --> 03:12:21 | Sometimes the market will cover just outside the lines. There's no |
| 2274 | 03:12:21 --> 03:12:26 | perfection, but it doesn't change the underlying narrative. It doesn't disrupt |
| 2275 | 03:12:26 --> 03:12:30 | any of that. Now I'm gonna give you one more advanced topic, and then I'm going |
| 2276 | 03:12:30 --> 03:12:36 | to close it because I'm hungry, and a banana and a little bit of orange juice |
| 2277 | 03:12:36 --> 03:12:44 | before I started today is simply just not enough. All right? So there are |
| 2278 | 03:12:44 --> 03:12:48 | times when you're anticipating a price run, okay? And it's going to reach for a |
| 2279 | 03:12:48 --> 03:12:55 | target, if the market is reaching for these upside targets or downside |
| 2280 | 03:12:55 --> 03:13:02 | targets, and it creates the wicks, but doesn't reach the targets, okay? And it |
| 2281 | 03:13:02 --> 03:13:05 | starts to create, like this reaching element, or it goes up a little bit, |
| 2282 | 03:13:05 --> 03:13:09 | comes back down, and goes a little bit higher, and it goes back down, if we |
| 2283 | 03:13:09 --> 03:13:15 | anticipate a a level. And I'm going to be full disclosure here, I believed at |
| 2284 | 03:13:15 --> 03:13:19 | 830 that we were going to spike up and hit this new week opening guy. I |
| 2285 | 03:13:19 --> 03:13:23 | believe, at the time watching it, I believe that that would happen, and it |
| 2286 | 03:13:23 --> 03:13:28 | didn't happen right away. It deferred and waited until the opening bell, which |
| 2287 | 03:13:28 --> 03:13:32 | is the next expectation, because that's the time elements, right? Well, 830 we |
| 2288 | 03:13:32 --> 03:13:39 | had a news driver. It failed. Okay? If there was no news driver that like ppi, |
| 2289 | 03:13:39 --> 03:13:46 | CPI, FOMC, or Non Farm Payroll, if those things not being part of the equation, |
| 2290 | 03:13:46 --> 03:13:50 | if they're not in the narrative or the day that I'm looking for these types of |
| 2291 | 03:13:50 --> 03:13:55 | things, if it does something like this, where it creates a candlestick, wick |
| 2292 | 03:13:55 --> 03:14:01 | like this, and I believe it's going to trade up here. Remember CPI, ppi, FOMC |
| 2293 | 03:14:01 --> 03:14:05 | and Non Farm Payroll, those characteristics that are around those |
| 2294 | 03:14:05 --> 03:14:10 | types of reports, they're always manually intervened. That means that the |
| 2295 | 03:14:10 --> 03:14:15 | algorithm is not letting or let me say it this way, the algorithm is being |
| 2296 | 03:14:15 --> 03:14:20 | interrupted and disrupted. And there's a hand in, in the in the mix, if you will. |
| 2297 | 03:14:21 --> 03:14:26 | It'll go just short of where you will go later on, when the market opens at 930 |
| 2298 | 03:14:26 --> 03:14:32 | or it'll go beyond where you thought I was going to go, and just keep on going. |
| 2299 | 03:14:33 --> 03:14:36 | Those are the two criteria. That's the reason why you have to be very careful |
| 2300 | 03:14:36 --> 03:14:41 | on those trading days. That's why I tell students don't trade on those days |
| 2301 | 03:14:41 --> 03:14:45 | because you don't know what you don't know, and you're gonna discover that you |
| 2302 | 03:14:45 --> 03:14:49 | don't know a whole lot, and it's taken some of your ass off of you, ripped your |
| 2303 | 03:14:49 --> 03:14:54 | face off, decapitated. You blew your account, wrecked, you divorced, you |
| 2304 | 03:14:54 --> 03:14:58 | okay, ruined. You got you fired because you lose your mind, because you lost |
| 2305 | 03:14:58 --> 03:15:01 | your account at work, and then you're like. The hell are you doing? I lost my |
| 2306 | 03:15:01 --> 03:15:05 | mind trading. Well, you supposed to be trading now you're fired. You can avoid |
| 2307 | 03:15:05 --> 03:15:10 | all that stuff by simply not trading those days at the time of the release of |
| 2308 | 03:15:10 --> 03:15:15 | the report. That doesn't mean don't trade them at all. I've made it very |
| 2309 | 03:15:15 --> 03:15:18 | plain and clear that you should not be trading at the time of that release, |
| 2310 | 03:15:18 --> 03:15:21 | even on Non Farm Payroll. If you want to trade the afternoon, it's easy to do |
| 2311 | 03:15:22 --> 03:15:26 | that you can trade 20, 3015, minutes after the initial Non Farm Payroll |
| 2312 | 03:15:26 --> 03:15:30 | numbers hit, but trading into them or trying to predict that, and you're never |
| 2313 | 03:15:30 --> 03:15:35 | going to be good at that and just avoid it. But with those things said, and all |
| 2314 | 03:15:35 --> 03:15:40 | things being equal, if the market starts around, and I believe it was going to |
| 2315 | 03:15:40 --> 03:15:43 | trade here, and I told you that yesterday, the market's going to trade |
| 2316 | 03:15:43 --> 03:15:50 | up and try to gravitate towards that. If the market does create this wick and |
| 2317 | 03:15:50 --> 03:15:55 | then the next candle, we start to trade up. Okay, but let's just say that I |
| 2318 | 03:15:55 --> 03:16:00 | believe that they're going to manipulate price because, not because the 830 news, |
| 2319 | 03:16:00 --> 03:16:03 | but they're going to leave relative equal highs, or I believe they're going |
| 2320 | 03:16:03 --> 03:16:10 | to engineer them. Okay, if I believe that, then what I like to look for is |
| 2321 | 03:16:10 --> 03:16:18 | this formation. It's the opposite of that, where you're predicting highs, |
| 2322 | 03:16:19 --> 03:16:29 | projecting Hans with the wicks. Sounds cool, doesn't it? Watch if we have a day |
| 2323 | 03:16:29 --> 03:16:34 | or a session, and I believe that they're going to try to keep hots. And I've done |
| 2324 | 03:16:34 --> 03:16:38 | this on Twitter. I've done this in executions videos. I've done this in |
| 2325 | 03:16:39 --> 03:16:42 | Twitter spaces where I've literally called out every individual candle, or |
| 2326 | 03:16:42 --> 03:16:46 | I've mentioned them in other people's live streams, where I'll go under their |
| 2327 | 03:16:46 --> 03:16:49 | chat window and I'll say I believe they're going to keep the relative |
| 2328 | 03:16:49 --> 03:16:54 | vehicle highs open or not traded to until the opening bell or at 10 o'clock. |
| 2329 | 03:16:54 --> 03:16:57 | Then I think they'll run it up there. And then we'll use a silver bullet idea. |
| 2330 | 03:16:58 --> 03:17:05 | If I have an inkling that the market's going to keep a high in place or a low |
| 2331 | 03:17:05 --> 03:17:12 | in place. I like to use this concept here, which is the first candlestick |
| 2332 | 03:17:12 --> 03:17:20 | that creates that wick here to there. See that? Now, what happens if it falls |
| 2333 | 03:17:20 --> 03:17:23 | short of an objective where I'm reaching for and this is ultimately where I think |
| 2334 | 03:17:23 --> 03:17:26 | it's going to trade to, maybe later in the day, at the opening bell or after |
| 2335 | 03:17:26 --> 03:17:30 | the opening bell, and during the opening range, the first 30 minutes, between 930 |
| 2336 | 03:17:31 --> 03:17:36 | and 10 o'clock New York Eastern time, if I think they're going to keep that there |
| 2337 | 03:17:36 --> 03:17:40 | and but I'm say I'm scalping, because I can buy long and sell short in the same |
| 2338 | 03:17:40 --> 03:17:43 | day and go Back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, like I was |
| 2339 | 03:17:43 --> 03:17:47 | talking about yesterday. I want to be in a market environment that creates and |
| 2340 | 03:17:47 --> 03:17:50 | promotes those opportunities. If it's just one sidedness and it's real |
| 2341 | 03:17:50 --> 03:17:53 | lethargic and choppy back and forth, but real tight ranges, but still drifting |
| 2342 | 03:17:53 --> 03:17:57 | high, I'll leave that to somebody else to trade that, and they can tell me they |
| 2343 | 03:17:57 --> 03:18:01 | made 300 handles, and I'm a dick because I didn't, I didn't make as many handles |
| 2344 | 03:18:01 --> 03:18:05 | there, but then I can come back the next day with less of a range and make four |
| 2345 | 03:18:05 --> 03:18:11 | times than they got. So if those instances are there, and I believe that |
| 2346 | 03:18:11 --> 03:18:13 | the range is going to stay intact, and they're not going to trade to an |
| 2347 | 03:18:13 --> 03:18:17 | objective. In other words, I believe that they're engineering liquidity, |
| 2348 | 03:18:17 --> 03:18:21 | meaning you didn't know about new week opening gaps and start talking about it. |
| 2349 | 03:18:21 --> 03:18:25 | So imagine a time before you learned about them. You might be thinking when |
| 2350 | 03:18:25 --> 03:18:29 | this candle was bold faced, bullish, wow, it's going to keep going higher. |
| 2351 | 03:18:29 --> 03:18:33 | Who knows where it's going to go? Right? Well, if I believe that they're going to |
| 2352 | 03:18:33 --> 03:18:40 | hold that range and use this objective later in the day, post 930 opening bell, |
| 2353 | 03:18:42 --> 03:18:45 | and I start to see a candlestick do this, and I'm long, say I'm long in a |
| 2354 | 03:18:45 --> 03:18:50 | scalp. Once it creates this, I want to see it's still likely to go here. I |
| 2355 | 03:18:50 --> 03:18:53 | might be wrong, so I'm going to give it a chance to go one more time, to reach |
| 2356 | 03:18:53 --> 03:18:58 | for it. If that's the case, then I can take this range here, and it's going to |
| 2357 | 03:18:58 --> 03:19:04 | do the opposite. It's the mirror image of what this was doing, where we create |
| 2358 | 03:19:04 --> 03:19:10 | the high the high wick, okay, and it's trading half of this wick here, but this |
| 2359 | 03:19:10 --> 03:19:14 | wick and in half of it, it just falls short of half of that. That's |
| 2360 | 03:19:14 --> 03:19:17 | reasonable. But what happens when you anticipate a range staying intact and in |
| 2361 | 03:19:17 --> 03:19:20 | it, not breaching it, or trading to an objective because they're engineering |
| 2362 | 03:19:20 --> 03:19:24 | liquidity. They're deferring a run to a particular price level. But you're in a |
| 2363 | 03:19:24 --> 03:19:28 | trade, or you're watching price action. It's really fun to do this. You see a |
| 2364 | 03:19:28 --> 03:19:32 | candle create this initial wick, then the next candle, it starts running above |
| 2365 | 03:19:32 --> 03:19:33 | it. |
| 2366 | 03:19:44 --> 03:19:48 | What's this? Candles high? You're looking at that price right there. Okay, |
| 2367 | 03:19:48 --> 03:19:56 | right here. What's that? Candles high? 19,001 49 even, right? That's what |
| 2368 | 03:19:56 --> 03:20:03 | you're seeing right here. This is. Is half of this candles wick that has yet |
| 2369 | 03:20:03 --> 03:20:11 | to form. And what is that? Boom, that's that's algorithmic. I used to sit on |
| 2370 | 03:20:11 --> 03:20:15 | baby pips and troll the fuck at everybody and say, Look, I'm telling |
| 2371 | 03:20:15 --> 03:20:18 | you. I can call the highs and the lows. I can do it with individual |
| 2372 | 03:20:18 --> 03:20:21 | candlesticks. I can do it in an hourly candle. I could do them daily ranges |
| 2373 | 03:20:21 --> 03:20:24 | that lower weekly range. I could do all that stuff, a lot of those things. I'm |
| 2374 | 03:20:24 --> 03:20:30 | not going to teach you that stuff, but tell me how this is buying and selling |
| 2375 | 03:20:30 --> 03:20:36 | pressure. How the fuck is that just gonna just be like that? Wicks do the |
| 2376 | 03:20:36 --> 03:20:42 | damage, but it's controlled demolition. It's controlled. It's controlled. |
| 2377 | 03:20:43 --> 03:20:47 | They're only going to do what's what it's coded to do until they manually |
| 2378 | 03:20:47 --> 03:20:51 | intervene. And when they do that, everything goes out to take off the |
| 2379 | 03:20:51 --> 03:20:55 | table, out the window. Don't trade. Simply sit still. I don't care how much |
| 2380 | 03:20:55 --> 03:20:59 | it moves around, how how many people come forward and say they made money |
| 2381 | 03:20:59 --> 03:21:02 | here, they passed their funded account challenge, or they got this much and |
| 2382 | 03:21:02 --> 03:21:04 | they're going to get a pay gonna get a payout on, I don't give a shit. They're |
| 2383 | 03:21:04 --> 03:21:08 | not gonna do that as a steady diet. Everybody can get lucky once in a while, |
| 2384 | 03:21:09 --> 03:21:13 | once in a while, but you're not here to try to be a one trick pony. You're not |
| 2385 | 03:21:13 --> 03:21:18 | here to try to get good enough to show one broker statement one day that he did |
| 2386 | 03:21:18 --> 03:21:21 | it right. You're not trying to do that. You're trying to be consistently |
| 2387 | 03:21:21 --> 03:21:25 | profitable. And you, before you get there, you got to be able to see what |
| 2388 | 03:21:25 --> 03:21:32 | these things do, how they repeat, how they tend to repeat. When will they when |
| 2389 | 03:21:32 --> 03:21:38 | will they produce these setups? When do you anticipate a price run? And I |
| 2390 | 03:21:38 --> 03:21:42 | haven't all these things understood. You can clearly see just in today and |
| 2391 | 03:21:42 --> 03:21:47 | yesterday, I have given you the equivalent of literally six chapters in |
| 2392 | 03:21:47 --> 03:21:54 | a book that I couldn't write in a book. These are subjects that you have to see |
| 2393 | 03:21:54 --> 03:21:58 | them in charts. You got to watch it unfold. Imagine me explaining to you in |
| 2394 | 03:21:58 --> 03:22:04 | a screenshot picture when it was up here. I believe that it could trade into |
| 2395 | 03:22:04 --> 03:22:09 | this fair value gap. I believe it can do that. I believe that it's going to use |
| 2396 | 03:22:09 --> 03:22:13 | this as a breaker, because we've already ran stops in a level that I knew the |
| 2397 | 03:22:13 --> 03:22:17 | previous day. Take my word for it, bro, trust me, right away, we're at a point |
| 2398 | 03:22:17 --> 03:22:20 | where the people are going to be taking the book and sending it back to the |
| 2399 | 03:22:20 --> 03:22:23 | publisher, saying, I want my money back. This guy's talking on his ASL hindsight, |
| 2400 | 03:22:24 --> 03:22:27 | but so you can't do that today. You can't do that yesterday. You can't do |
| 2401 | 03:22:27 --> 03:22:31 | that since last Monday, when I started streaming every day. You can't do that |
| 2402 | 03:22:31 --> 03:22:38 | because I'm giving you things that are over top of real price action live. And |
| 2403 | 03:22:38 --> 03:22:42 | I say I took a picture and I didn't have any of this data to the left, to the |
| 2404 | 03:22:42 --> 03:22:45 | right of all this here, and I was pointing to this level here, saying, |
| 2405 | 03:22:45 --> 03:22:49 | trust me, bro, this is where I think it's going to go. And then I show you |
| 2406 | 03:22:49 --> 03:22:52 | the next picture, and it looks like that. That's the equivalent what you get |
| 2407 | 03:22:52 --> 03:22:56 | from people mentoring or using Market Replay. How? How is that inspiring? It |
| 2408 | 03:22:56 --> 03:23:00 | doesn't inspire me. I would feel shitty if I was trying to use examples like |
| 2409 | 03:23:00 --> 03:23:04 | that, like, I have to be out here live explaining this, because if it isn't |
| 2410 | 03:23:04 --> 03:23:09 | real, I can't explain it. It wouldn't be there. It won't repeat, right? I mean, |
| 2411 | 03:23:09 --> 03:23:12 | clearly you can appreciate that. Even if you don't like my personality, you don't |
| 2412 | 03:23:12 --> 03:23:18 | like the way I teach, you have to come to the conclusion and be real. If it's |
| 2413 | 03:23:18 --> 03:23:22 | there, if it's valid, if the stuff really works, and if I know it, then I |
| 2414 | 03:23:22 --> 03:23:28 | can communicate it and explain to you what it's going to do, conceptually, why |
| 2415 | 03:23:28 --> 03:23:34 | it should do it and when. Now, if you get those things understood, can you |
| 2416 | 03:23:34 --> 03:23:38 | think for a moment, put your put your pitchforks and your torches down for a |
| 2417 | 03:23:38 --> 03:23:41 | minute for people that are watching don't like me, you're just looking for |
| 2418 | 03:23:41 --> 03:23:46 | little bits to talk about and troll. Think about it for a second. If those |
| 2419 | 03:23:46 --> 03:23:50 | two things are equal and true that there's sound logic here, it really does |
| 2420 | 03:23:50 --> 03:23:58 | work, and it could be timed. Would you agree that if you had those aspects |
| 2421 | 03:23:59 --> 03:24:04 | under your belt and you understood those components to this. Can you see how easy |
| 2422 | 03:24:05 --> 03:24:10 | the entries are after that? Can you see how easy the stop loss placement would |
| 2423 | 03:24:10 --> 03:24:15 | be and how the target where to get out and where to take partials at? Because, |
| 2424 | 03:24:15 --> 03:24:19 | literally, I gave you a clinic on those very things, today and yesterday, and |
| 2425 | 03:24:21 --> 03:24:25 | you didn't need to see me push a button. You didn't see any do a demo. You didn't |
| 2426 | 03:24:25 --> 03:24:29 | see a live account. You watch me explain these candlesticks. That every human |
| 2427 | 03:24:29 --> 03:24:35 | being that's watching this industry, all around the world, we're all watching the |
| 2428 | 03:24:35 --> 03:24:38 | same market. It's not like fucking Forex, where Tom Dick And Harry's |
| 2429 | 03:24:38 --> 03:24:42 | fucking brokerage firm has a different high, or a different low, a different |
| 2430 | 03:24:42 --> 03:24:45 | opening price, because they can fuck you in the spread, everybody has the same |
| 2431 | 03:24:45 --> 03:24:50 | price. We're all looking at the same thing. You can't, you can't get you |
| 2432 | 03:24:50 --> 03:24:54 | can't escape it. You can't get with around that. At that aspect, it's it's |
| 2433 | 03:24:54 --> 03:25:01 | real, and I'm doing the lowest latency in live streaming. I. I pulled out the |
| 2434 | 03:25:01 --> 03:25:04 | levels I told you where to focus at when we first got on the stream, I was a |
| 2435 | 03:25:04 --> 03:25:11 | little discombobulated at the beginning, because I was angry, but I found my |
| 2436 | 03:25:11 --> 03:25:18 | groove. But I taught you today two forms of turtle suit real. One, not wish |
| 2437 | 03:25:18 --> 03:25:24 | version, not the street smarts version, okay, but this one here is going to |
| 2438 | 03:25:24 --> 03:25:27 | require you to understand a whole lot more, because it's going to be very |
| 2439 | 03:25:27 --> 03:25:31 | difficult for you to sell short as it's raging into that. And I promise you, |
| 2440 | 03:25:31 --> 03:25:35 | there ain't a mother fucker on Twitter and a mother fucker on Instagram that's |
| 2441 | 03:25:35 --> 03:25:38 | going to take a trade as its bold face like that, and go short and do that over |
| 2442 | 03:25:38 --> 03:25:44 | and over and over again. I can do that. And I have examples of proving it with a |
| 2443 | 03:25:44 --> 03:25:50 | live fucking account, not demo. I have examples of that. You can see them. You |
| 2444 | 03:25:50 --> 03:25:53 | can watch me to enter them. You can see me using a stop loss. You can see the |
| 2445 | 03:25:53 --> 03:26:01 | targets being hit. But when I teach, I teach with a demo. I teach that way, |
| 2446 | 03:26:01 --> 03:26:07 | because I'm giving you an illustration inside of a controlled environment that |
| 2447 | 03:26:07 --> 03:26:11 | I'm not going to take a loss, I'm not going to realize a profit, and that |
| 2448 | 03:26:11 --> 03:26:15 | means that I'm teaching you under that medium's limitations, so that way |
| 2449 | 03:26:15 --> 03:26:19 | there's no miscommunication here. I am not trying to tell you, copy me with |
| 2450 | 03:26:19 --> 03:26:24 | your real account. Copy me because I'm pretending to be a financial advisor. |
| 2451 | 03:26:24 --> 03:26:31 | I'm not. I am a candlestick whisperer. Okay, that's what I am. I'm telling |
| 2452 | 03:26:31 --> 03:26:35 | these candlesticks when and how to move and how to dance, and I'm teaching you |
| 2453 | 03:26:35 --> 03:26:39 | the language and the sheet music they follow. That's it. That's all we're |
| 2454 | 03:26:39 --> 03:26:44 | doing here. That doesn't mean buying and selling profits. That doesn't mean |
| 2455 | 03:26:45 --> 03:26:50 | equity curves going through the moon. It just means that that is our language |
| 2456 | 03:26:50 --> 03:26:55 | here. That protects me, it protects you. That means I can talk and be free about |
| 2457 | 03:26:55 --> 03:26:58 | what is I want to talk about, and how I want to talk about it. And no one can |
| 2458 | 03:26:58 --> 03:27:03 | take it out of context and say You caused me to lose money? No, I didn't. |
| 2459 | 03:27:04 --> 03:27:10 | Absolutely not. Nope, because if you copy me, and you're going to see down in |
| 2460 | 03:27:10 --> 03:27:14 | the lower left hand corner, it's going to say paper trading, and I'm going to |
| 2461 | 03:27:14 --> 03:27:19 | execute in price action that's live, using the logic that I'm outlining here |
| 2462 | 03:27:19 --> 03:27:24 | for my son. And when these trades pan out, you're gonna have to, you're gonna |
| 2463 | 03:27:24 --> 03:27:29 | have the problem of thinking, Okay, if he can do this, why didn't he do it a |
| 2464 | 03:27:29 --> 03:27:34 | Live account? It's because I'm in the United States. There's an organization |
| 2465 | 03:27:34 --> 03:27:37 | called the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. They have tapped me on the |
| 2466 | 03:27:37 --> 03:27:41 | shoulder in the 90s because I was not using risk disclaimers, and I was |
| 2467 | 03:27:41 --> 03:27:46 | telling people what to do, and I didn't know that I was against the law then, |
| 2468 | 03:27:46 --> 03:27:50 | and they served me papers at my aunt when I was living with her, and I don't |
| 2469 | 03:27:50 --> 03:27:56 | want any legal trouble, not with that shit. So I learned by lesson, okay, I |
| 2470 | 03:27:56 --> 03:27:59 | said, Okay, I'll never do that again, and that's why there's risk disclaimers |
| 2471 | 03:27:59 --> 03:28:02 | in my description and at the start of the live stream. And when I see other |
| 2472 | 03:28:02 --> 03:28:05 | people live streaming that don't have those verse disclaimers, I'm quick to |
| 2473 | 03:28:05 --> 03:28:09 | tell them, You are fucking around and you're gonna find out. You do not want |
| 2474 | 03:28:09 --> 03:28:12 | to be messing around this shit. They back then they loved fucking with |
| 2475 | 03:28:12 --> 03:28:18 | people, and I was growing in my community on America Online. So there |
| 2476 | 03:28:18 --> 03:28:23 | you go. I don't want to be in trouble because some asshole said You caused me |
| 2477 | 03:28:23 --> 03:28:27 | to lose money. And here's the proof, proof of what that you traded with real |
| 2478 | 03:28:27 --> 03:28:31 | money. When I'm trading with a demo account, you're losing that fucking case |
| 2479 | 03:28:31 --> 03:28:35 | right away. They're not even gonna worry about me because I'm trading in a demo |
| 2480 | 03:28:35 --> 03:28:39 | account. You people in other countries, you think you're fucking smart, you |
| 2481 | 03:28:39 --> 03:28:42 | leave condescending comments, like you're so intellectually superior. Oh, |
| 2482 | 03:28:42 --> 03:28:46 | you're trading with a demo account. Mr. Demo trader. You have no idea what it's |
| 2483 | 03:28:46 --> 03:28:51 | like in the US. These motherfuckers, our country is so litigious, they're trying |
| 2484 | 03:28:51 --> 03:28:56 | to sue everybody, especially now everybody's looking for a lawsuit. And |
| 2485 | 03:28:56 --> 03:29:02 | frankly, I don't give a fuck if you ever like me or use my information. I don't |
| 2486 | 03:29:02 --> 03:29:06 | care. I have enough people out there that have used it. They've communicated |
| 2487 | 03:29:06 --> 03:29:12 | their their appreciation for it, and I'm teaching my son how to deal so because |
| 2488 | 03:29:12 --> 03:29:17 | you're all watching you're all watching me teach him, and because it's public, |
| 2489 | 03:29:17 --> 03:29:21 | I'm going to use that medium as the same methodology that I've used all along as |
| 2490 | 03:29:21 --> 03:29:26 | a mentor I'm teaching through the medium of a demo account. If I can't do it with |
| 2491 | 03:29:26 --> 03:29:27 | live price action, |
| 2492 | 03:29:29 --> 03:29:34 | where it's real time price data, if it doesn't hold up to that, well, that it |
| 2493 | 03:29:34 --> 03:29:38 | goes without saying it wouldn't work in a live account, that's an easy litmus |
| 2494 | 03:29:38 --> 03:29:42 | test. You think that somehow that I'm gonna forget how to build because now |
| 2495 | 03:29:42 --> 03:29:48 | there's money, real money. It's just it's the same thing. It's the same |
| 2496 | 03:29:48 --> 03:29:54 | thing. Nothing's changing. The logic isn't morphing into something else. I'm |
| 2497 | 03:29:54 --> 03:29:57 | not excited about or fearful whatever the outcome of the trade is going to be. |
| 2498 | 03:29:57 --> 03:30:01 | That's the whole point of you learning. The whole point. Point is for you to be |
| 2499 | 03:30:01 --> 03:30:04 | here to that way you desensitize yourself and strip away all the fear and |
| 2500 | 03:30:04 --> 03:30:08 | the concern and the excitement about making money. It shouldn't be exciting. |
| 2501 | 03:30:08 --> 03:30:14 | What you should be excited about is you're learning how to read it. You're |
| 2502 | 03:30:14 --> 03:30:18 | being comfortable with, oh, I wasn't surprised by that. I expected it to do |
| 2503 | 03:30:18 --> 03:30:23 | this. I expected it to do those things, and when you get to that conclusion, |
| 2504 | 03:30:25 --> 03:30:30 | it's very fun to be a trader, because you're not going to go around with a |
| 2505 | 03:30:30 --> 03:30:35 | sharp stick where, you know, I've done this in the past. It's that how I got |
| 2506 | 03:30:35 --> 03:30:40 | traction. That's how I built my channel initially. If I started a fire, people |
| 2507 | 03:30:40 --> 03:30:44 | would come there and see what's burning, and it's usually the people I was |
| 2508 | 03:30:44 --> 03:30:48 | pointing to, and there I was trolling them with a demo account, knowing full |
| 2509 | 03:30:48 --> 03:30:51 | well I'm clowning them, because they can easily come back and say, Oh, you're a |
| 2510 | 03:30:51 --> 03:30:55 | demo baller, right? I called myself a demo baller. That's why everybody calls |
| 2511 | 03:30:55 --> 03:30:59 | me that. I coined that term, but I did it as a way So, number one, I could be |
| 2512 | 03:30:59 --> 03:31:03 | disarmed. What could they say? Events against me? Nothing. You can't say shit. |
| 2513 | 03:31:04 --> 03:31:08 | I've already proven that I'm teaching through a demo, but I'm able to see |
| 2514 | 03:31:08 --> 03:31:12 | something in real price action that they're not able to do. So I had a lot |
| 2515 | 03:31:12 --> 03:31:16 | of fun with that. And sure did I overstep my bounds and get a little too |
| 2516 | 03:31:16 --> 03:31:22 | hard with a few of them years and years ago on big events? Of course I did, but |
| 2517 | 03:31:22 --> 03:31:29 | that that's how you create an interest, because otherwise I'm boring, right? I'm |
| 2518 | 03:31:29 --> 03:31:33 | an old fuddy duddy guy that just talks too much. So if I can cause a fire, a |
| 2519 | 03:31:33 --> 03:31:38 | train wreck, a car accident where there's smoke, there's fire, that means |
| 2520 | 03:31:38 --> 03:31:44 | that I don't have to advertise, I'll get people talking, and then that's how this |
| 2521 | 03:31:44 --> 03:31:51 | channel grew to 1.3 1.3 3 million followers. Not one advertisement, not |
| 2522 | 03:31:51 --> 03:31:56 | one. And I'm not liked by everybody. And everybody thinks I'm a fraud. |
| 2523 | 03:31:56 --> 03:32:00 | Everybody's like, well, he's not on the leaderboard of Robin cup. Are you still |
| 2524 | 03:32:00 --> 03:32:06 | in the Robins cup? Yes, I'm in the Robins cup, but I don't see anybody |
| 2525 | 03:32:06 --> 03:32:13 | else. I've given them all this whole year, and not one of them got up there. |
| 2526 | 03:32:14 --> 03:32:18 | Well, that's not entirely true. One got up there by accounting error, but after |
| 2527 | 03:32:18 --> 03:32:22 | that, nothing. Apparently, it's not his circus. It's not his monkeys. That's a |
| 2528 | 03:32:22 --> 03:32:26 | pretty good one. That's a pretty good excuse. But I was looking forward to, I |
| 2529 | 03:32:26 --> 03:32:29 | mean, look, we're going into September in a couple weeks. I mean, good grief, |
| 2530 | 03:32:29 --> 03:32:32 | it should have been easy for them to get up there and least make a showing, |
| 2531 | 03:32:32 --> 03:32:41 | right? But we'll see. We'll see. It's gonna be fun in December. December 31 I |
| 2532 | 03:32:41 --> 03:32:45 | might come back on January 1 and wish you all happy new year on Twitter. I'll |
| 2533 | 03:32:45 --> 03:32:51 | come back just just for that. But I taught you a lot today. I taught you a |
| 2534 | 03:32:51 --> 03:32:57 | whole lot today, and some of these elements I had no interest at ever |
| 2535 | 03:32:57 --> 03:33:03 | sharing. And you know, granted, is everything that I thought here going to |
| 2536 | 03:33:03 --> 03:33:07 | be applicable to every one of you. No, some of you had lots of your questions |
| 2537 | 03:33:07 --> 03:33:10 | answered. Some of you have new questions that came from this. And that's great. |
| 2538 | 03:33:11 --> 03:33:17 | That's great. Write those questions down in your journal, okay? And you'll see by |
| 2539 | 03:33:17 --> 03:33:20 | the natural progression of me doing this over live streaming and talking about |
| 2540 | 03:33:20 --> 03:33:24 | price before it happens, and watching and giving you further details, like I |
| 2541 | 03:33:24 --> 03:33:28 | was doing today, I taught the only two elements of turtle suit there is okay, |
| 2542 | 03:33:30 --> 03:33:34 | buying below old lows or selling above old highs. There's only two forms of |
| 2543 | 03:33:34 --> 03:33:40 | that. It's trade direction and change in a state of delivery, which is, this is a |
| 2544 | 03:33:40 --> 03:33:44 | turtle suit for that is not the street smarts version of it. I just like the |
| 2545 | 03:33:44 --> 03:33:53 | name. Okay? I love the name. If I had another cooler name, I've used the idea |
| 2546 | 03:33:53 --> 03:33:59 | in that name since 1995 so it's kind of like, why change it? I always give |
| 2547 | 03:33:59 --> 03:34:04 | credit to the inspiration of the name and the idea of stopping out somebody, |
| 2548 | 03:34:05 --> 03:34:09 | because that book, those two authors, they were highly influential to me, |
| 2549 | 03:34:10 --> 03:34:14 | understanding being stopped out and going the other direction like I didn't, |
| 2550 | 03:34:14 --> 03:34:19 | it didn't cross my mind that that was a thing I was. That's how green I was as a |
| 2551 | 03:34:19 --> 03:34:24 | trader in the 90s, early on. But it solidified it. I was like, oh shit, that |
| 2552 | 03:34:24 --> 03:34:28 | makes perfect sense now. Oh, no wonder. Okay, that's that's what happens to me |
| 2553 | 03:34:28 --> 03:34:31 | when I'm wrong. I'm getting stopped out and it's going the other direction, and |
| 2554 | 03:34:31 --> 03:34:34 | I'm not aware of what's going on, and I'm in Shell Shock, like a deer in |
| 2555 | 03:34:34 --> 03:34:37 | headlights. I'm staring at it, watching the price keep going, going, going, |
| 2556 | 03:34:37 --> 03:34:42 | going. And now we can see when it changes, and we can be a part of it. And |
| 2557 | 03:34:42 --> 03:34:46 | when we get that run that we waited for, that we went into the trading day |
| 2558 | 03:34:46 --> 03:34:48 | looking for not Well, I don't know what's going to happen today. Let me |
| 2559 | 03:34:48 --> 03:34:52 | just find something thought that if you do that, if your starting your day is |
| 2560 | 03:34:52 --> 03:35:01 | like that, you have an 80% chance of leaving the day unprofitable. You. To |
| 2561 | 03:35:01 --> 03:35:07 | write that down. If you're going into the trading day and you don't know what |
| 2562 | 03:35:07 --> 03:35:12 | to expect, you're waiting for more information, and you are going to make a |
| 2563 | 03:35:12 --> 03:35:17 | trade come hell or high water, you're going to trade. You have an 80% chance |
| 2564 | 03:35:17 --> 03:35:24 | of you're not making money that day. I'm telling you, that's the gospel contrast |
| 2565 | 03:35:24 --> 03:35:29 | that with I know what I'm looking for tomorrow, in the rest of the week, this |
| 2566 | 03:35:29 --> 03:35:33 | is where it's probably drawing to, if this level or that particular level |
| 2567 | 03:35:33 --> 03:35:37 | doesn't get traded to. I'll give you a perfect example yesterday before we |
| 2568 | 03:35:37 --> 03:35:40 | close the stream. I told you that this new week opening gap here from july 28 |
| 2569 | 03:35:41 --> 03:35:45 | look and see if I if it's not in there, it's there. And I've talked about the |
| 2570 | 03:35:45 --> 03:35:55 | daily objectives on on NASDAQ, the volume imbalance, the the short term, |
| 2571 | 03:35:55 --> 03:35:59 | high on the daily chart. All those things could be factors for it to if |
| 2572 | 03:35:59 --> 03:36:02 | it's going to continue higher, that's where it could gyrate to, because it's |
| 2573 | 03:36:02 --> 03:36:05 | an election year. They they think the general public thinks that the stock |
| 2574 | 03:36:05 --> 03:36:13 | market is a measurement of the economy, and it's not so. If you know, like I was |
| 2575 | 03:36:13 --> 03:36:17 | telling you yesterday, that this is a likely upside objective, well that means |
| 2576 | 03:36:17 --> 03:36:22 | when I start the day at 830 when I was watching this, I wanted to see a trade |
| 2577 | 03:36:22 --> 03:36:30 | up there right at 830 if it would have done that, hit it, and then at 930 went |
| 2578 | 03:36:30 --> 03:36:34 | above it, and then failed. I would expected something like this at 930 |
| 2579 | 03:36:34 --> 03:36:38 | opening bell, because it would have traded to the objective I gave you |
| 2580 | 03:36:38 --> 03:36:46 | yesterday, and it did it on the first leg at 830 and then left that smooth |
| 2581 | 03:36:46 --> 03:36:49 | like that, real easy. Didn't go above it at all. Then at 930 if they would have |
| 2582 | 03:36:49 --> 03:36:52 | poked above it one more time, that would have been a turtle soup. And I would |
| 2583 | 03:36:52 --> 03:36:57 | have said right here screenshot that while it's bold faced up, and then when |
| 2584 | 03:36:57 --> 03:37:01 | it's dropping down, I'd say that's exactly what the turtle suit looks like |
| 2585 | 03:37:01 --> 03:37:07 | as it forms like this. But you have to know what you're looking for if, if you |
| 2586 | 03:37:07 --> 03:37:12 | don't know what it's likely to reach for, before you start looking at your |
| 2587 | 03:37:12 --> 03:37:15 | charts like you have to have notes when you close your session out today, when |
| 2588 | 03:37:15 --> 03:37:19 | you're done, you're not looking at the charts until tomorrow, whatever the next |
| 2589 | 03:37:19 --> 03:37:23 | session is for you, if you don't have levels that are key to you, where you |
| 2590 | 03:37:23 --> 03:37:30 | think it's likely drawing to you don't know what you're doing, if you're going |
| 2591 | 03:37:30 --> 03:37:34 | into the day, and you don't know what you're looking for, and you just don't |
| 2592 | 03:37:34 --> 03:37:42 | know the top of your notepad and on your charts, type it out, I do not have to |
| 2593 | 03:37:42 --> 03:37:47 | trade today. Let that be a reminder, because it's so easy to talk yourself |
| 2594 | 03:37:47 --> 03:37:51 | into a trade. It's easy to do so if you're watching me, it's easy to do so |
| 2595 | 03:37:51 --> 03:37:54 | if you're watching other live streamers, and if you don't know why you're doing |
| 2596 | 03:37:54 --> 03:37:59 | what you're doing or expecting what you expect to see in price action, in in in |
| 2597 | 03:37:59 --> 03:38:03 | the moments before you turn your systems on your computer, your phone, or |
| 2598 | 03:38:03 --> 03:38:05 | whatever it is, you used to watch charts. |
| 2599 | 03:38:07 --> 03:38:11 | If you don't have that information ahead of time written down somewhere, either |
| 2600 | 03:38:11 --> 03:38:15 | in your charts, annotated or on a notepad, if you don't know where it's |
| 2601 | 03:38:15 --> 03:38:22 | likely drawing to next, do not give yourself the open invitation to go out |
| 2602 | 03:38:22 --> 03:38:26 | and simply trade, because now the markets are trading, you have to |
| 2603 | 03:38:26 --> 03:38:32 | exercise a great deal of discipline and be responsible. Now, I have a lot of |
| 2604 | 03:38:32 --> 03:38:36 | experience. I've been doing it for a long time. There may be moments where I |
| 2605 | 03:38:36 --> 03:38:40 | don't have a bias, and I've I've shown this in my mentorship, when I was doing |
| 2606 | 03:38:40 --> 03:38:45 | live streams for them, but that was part of the mentorship. I would tell them, |
| 2607 | 03:38:45 --> 03:38:48 | Okay, I don't have a whole I don't hold a hard bias right now. So I want to see |
| 2608 | 03:38:48 --> 03:38:52 | what we what we were going to get at the opening bell. I want to see how they use |
| 2609 | 03:38:52 --> 03:38:57 | the opening range between 930 and 10 o'clock. Okay, what I'm saying is, is |
| 2610 | 03:38:57 --> 03:39:04 | I'm not holding a bias that I can trust that's going to lend to it's going to |
| 2611 | 03:39:04 --> 03:39:08 | draw higher to this premium array, or it's going to draw lower to this |
| 2612 | 03:39:08 --> 03:39:12 | discount array. I don't know which direction it wants to do at the moment |
| 2613 | 03:39:12 --> 03:39:15 | before the session starts. And then when I look at the opening range, then it |
| 2614 | 03:39:15 --> 03:39:19 | gives me more information. Then I can say, Okay, well, they, they've made this |
| 2615 | 03:39:20 --> 03:39:24 | they made this area jagged. So then I'm going to look for something that's a |
| 2616 | 03:39:24 --> 03:39:29 | smooth area, or if it's a high impact news driver, then it's going to be what |
| 2617 | 03:39:29 --> 03:39:33 | it's going to be the liquidity below that. So we don't need to see a relative |
| 2618 | 03:39:33 --> 03:39:37 | equal high or relative equal low when there's a CPI number, PPI number, or |
| 2619 | 03:39:37 --> 03:39:42 | FOMC or a non front payroll. Those are the characteristics that you do after |
| 2620 | 03:39:42 --> 03:39:45 | the report. You look at how they're going to come back on the individuals |
| 2621 | 03:39:45 --> 03:39:50 | that would have made money on that run. I used that logic yesterday, but I also |
| 2622 | 03:39:50 --> 03:39:55 | told you in advance, if it goes higher, I'm not interested. I'm not interested |
| 2623 | 03:39:55 --> 03:40:00 | in that. So I didn't change my protocol. I just told you this is. Day would not |
| 2624 | 03:40:00 --> 03:40:03 | be interested if it just keeps grinding high. I won't chase that. I won't worry |
| 2625 | 03:40:03 --> 03:40:08 | about it. And then I want to be a part of a day that has like this, like we had |
| 2626 | 03:40:08 --> 03:40:12 | really nice we had the mess here first. Then it went up to where I was telling |
| 2627 | 03:40:12 --> 03:40:16 | you yesterday. It went to it perfectly. Then we watched this area here. It |
| 2628 | 03:40:16 --> 03:40:20 | didn't give me an entry if I would have used it, because it's not inside the |
| 2629 | 03:40:20 --> 03:40:24 | fair value gap. It wasn't booking that price. But the logic was, is it should |
| 2630 | 03:40:24 --> 03:40:30 | move from here down to the midpoint of this wick. We wants to happen. Then this |
| 2631 | 03:40:30 --> 03:40:34 | fair value gap traded up into that and it returned back to the six o'clock |
| 2632 | 03:40:35 --> 03:40:40 | opening price, which is not on here anymore, but we went to the next |
| 2633 | 03:40:40 --> 03:40:46 | quadrant level here, which is the lower quarter, and then the low, and then we |
| 2634 | 03:40:46 --> 03:40:49 | would be attacking the liquidity resting below that. And then I gave you |
| 2635 | 03:40:49 --> 03:40:53 | measurement strategies on how to take the high, the low, whatever the quarter |
| 2636 | 03:40:54 --> 03:40:57 | percentage of that range is projected below that low. That's a pretty good |
| 2637 | 03:40:57 --> 03:41:00 | ballpark figure. It's not going to give you the lowest low, but it's going to |
| 2638 | 03:41:00 --> 03:41:05 | give you something that you can be happy with. And then we get all this range |
| 2639 | 03:41:05 --> 03:41:09 | back all the way up it Pierce just this high, and then we broke right back down. |
| 2640 | 03:41:09 --> 03:41:13 | And where does it trade? To look at the bodies of that candles there. Look at |
| 2641 | 03:41:13 --> 03:41:21 | that. You think that's random. Boom, swept it. And now we're just gyrating |
| 2642 | 03:41:21 --> 03:41:25 | around. I would not be interested in trading anymore today. I'd move through |
| 2643 | 03:41:25 --> 03:41:29 | the sidelines, and I'd be content with what we observed today, what has been |
| 2644 | 03:41:29 --> 03:41:34 | logged as price action. I would break this down, okay? I would go through the |
| 2645 | 03:41:34 --> 03:41:38 | whole individual day from a one minute chart, a five minute chart and a 15 |
| 2646 | 03:41:38 --> 03:41:41 | minute chart, and then annotate everything, like I'm doing here. There's |
| 2647 | 03:41:41 --> 03:41:44 | other things in this chart. This chart. I don't want to do everything for you, |
| 2648 | 03:41:44 --> 03:41:48 | because if you just screenshot my chart, there's your journal entry and you put |
| 2649 | 03:41:48 --> 03:41:52 | your annotations here, that's not what I want to do. Caleb, I want you to go |
| 2650 | 03:41:52 --> 03:41:55 | through all of this. And that goes for all of you watching too. Don't just take |
| 2651 | 03:41:55 --> 03:41:59 | my chart and screenshot when I have annotations on it and say, you know, I'm |
| 2652 | 03:41:59 --> 03:42:03 | journaling. You're not. You're fucking collecting stamps. That's all you're |
| 2653 | 03:42:03 --> 03:42:07 | doing. It's that's a stupid fucking hobby. It's like collecting baseball |
| 2654 | 03:42:07 --> 03:42:11 | cards. What the fuck is the point of that? That's dumb videos. Do something |
| 2655 | 03:42:11 --> 03:42:19 | else. So if I collect colognes, that's a better hobby, right? You see how |
| 2656 | 03:42:19 --> 03:42:22 | everybody has their own personality. Some of you probably have some really |
| 2657 | 03:42:22 --> 03:42:26 | good money in stamps or maybe even baseball cards. I think it's stupid, and |
| 2658 | 03:42:26 --> 03:42:30 | some of you probably think it's stupid for me to have colognes. Is 430 bottles |
| 2659 | 03:42:30 --> 03:42:35 | of Cologne. That's dumb. Well, it's what I like. You like baseball cards. You |
| 2660 | 03:42:35 --> 03:42:40 | like stamps. You know. You like whatever everybody has. It's different strokes |
| 2661 | 03:42:40 --> 03:42:44 | for different folks, but in trading, it's going to be the same thing. I have |
| 2662 | 03:42:44 --> 03:42:52 | lots of tools, lots of things to get into a trade, lots of criteria that you |
| 2663 | 03:42:52 --> 03:42:59 | can apply and make it yours, with your personality, but your model that you |
| 2664 | 03:42:59 --> 03:43:03 | arrive at if you made it available to other people and saying, This is what I |
| 2665 | 03:43:03 --> 03:43:09 | do. I don't have a problem with that, because it's what you learn from me. You |
| 2666 | 03:43:09 --> 03:43:15 | could go on on YouTube and say, this is my model. It's not a mentorship. This is |
| 2667 | 03:43:15 --> 03:43:18 | what I do, and this is how I'm going to implement it. And in live stream, I've |
| 2668 | 03:43:18 --> 03:43:21 | encouraged my students that want to do it. I'm not trying to talk them into it. |
| 2669 | 03:43:22 --> 03:43:25 | I said, if you want to do this, if it's in, if it's in, your personality, do so |
| 2670 | 03:43:26 --> 03:43:30 | and you know your model, you don't want to discover your model by doing that. |
| 2671 | 03:43:30 --> 03:43:33 | Okay, there's a couple live streamers out there that are doing that right now, |
| 2672 | 03:43:33 --> 03:43:37 | and that's why they're not doing well. That's that's exactly why they're not |
| 2673 | 03:43:37 --> 03:43:41 | doing well. And they're trying to sell courses too. So that's a stupid ass |
| 2674 | 03:43:41 --> 03:43:46 | fucking procedure, if, if the person's failing and losing their funded |
| 2675 | 03:43:46 --> 03:43:48 | accounts, and they keep resetting, and they keep proving it to you, because |
| 2676 | 03:43:48 --> 03:43:51 | they show you the numbers. Here's the account numbers. Here's my new I blew |
| 2677 | 03:43:51 --> 03:43:55 | the accounts. I blew the accounts, all that stuff, and they're trying to sell |
| 2678 | 03:43:55 --> 03:43:59 | you a fucking course, no matter how cheap it is, you're an idiot if you buy |
| 2679 | 03:43:59 --> 03:44:03 | that. And just saying you can hate me, call me whatever you want, okay, but |
| 2680 | 03:44:03 --> 03:44:07 | you're a fucking idiot if you pay money for that. That doesn't make any fucking |
| 2681 | 03:44:07 --> 03:44:14 | sense. Now I have students, okay? I have students that have made money. They have |
| 2682 | 03:44:14 --> 03:44:18 | placed on the Robins cup. They have literally had taken hundreds of 1000s of |
| 2683 | 03:44:18 --> 03:44:25 | dollars out of several of the funded account companies, and they aspire, and |
| 2684 | 03:44:25 --> 03:44:30 | some of them are actually doing their own mentorship. Okay, I took the |
| 2685 | 03:44:30 --> 03:44:33 | interviews down in case they haven't noticed. I'm thinking that public |
| 2686 | 03:44:33 --> 03:44:38 | knowledge. I took those interviews down because now what you just did is you |
| 2687 | 03:44:38 --> 03:44:45 | entered a business of education, and you went in that business with my name |
| 2688 | 03:44:45 --> 03:44:49 | attached to it some way, shape or form. I am not going to endorse your business |
| 2689 | 03:44:49 --> 03:44:52 | because I don't know what you're doing, how you're conducting yourself as a |
| 2690 | 03:44:52 --> 03:44:56 | business person. I'm not saying that that's right or wrong. I'm just saying I |
| 2691 | 03:44:56 --> 03:45:01 | have to distance myself from that. I. Students have started their own funded |
| 2692 | 03:45:01 --> 03:45:05 | account company, and to my understanding, it didn't do. Well, okay, |
| 2693 | 03:45:05 --> 03:45:08 | I don't know the ramifications around it, but apparently it didn't do and I |
| 2694 | 03:45:08 --> 03:45:12 | may be wrong, I don't know, but I know that at one time, I had this state |
| 2695 | 03:45:12 --> 03:45:16 | publicly that has nothing to do with me. I'm not invested in this. I have no |
| 2696 | 03:45:16 --> 03:45:19 | kickback from it. I'm not promoting it. I have nothing to do with it because |
| 2697 | 03:45:19 --> 03:45:23 | you're messing with other people's money. And when you start collecting |
| 2698 | 03:45:23 --> 03:45:29 | things as payments, and you're calling it a mentorship, and you have my logo, |
| 2699 | 03:45:29 --> 03:45:34 | or you're saying ICT in the videos or the advertisements or whatever you are, |
| 2700 | 03:45:34 --> 03:45:40 | indirectly pulling me into that, and I'm saying the fuck you are. I'm severing |
| 2701 | 03:45:40 --> 03:45:47 | that I am by myself. If anybody learns from me and they want to make |
| 2702 | 03:45:47 --> 03:45:52 | mentorships, okay, I've already said this on Twitter spaces. If you have made |
| 2703 | 03:45:52 --> 03:45:59 | money using what I taught and you have made that your own model, you're not out |
| 2704 | 03:45:59 --> 03:46:03 | there trying to pretend you invented something, but this is what you arrived |
| 2705 | 03:46:03 --> 03:46:08 | at, using the information. And then you show people how you use that |
| 2706 | 03:46:09 --> 03:46:16 | information. I don't have a problem with that. I will never fuck with you. I will |
| 2707 | 03:46:16 --> 03:46:19 | not say you did this. I'm not gonna talk shit about you. I'm not gonna go in your |
| 2708 | 03:46:19 --> 03:46:22 | comment section. I'm not going to talk shit about you and say, Oh, you're |
| 2709 | 03:46:22 --> 03:46:26 | you're $1 man. Your mentors, I'm not talking about that. The people that are |
| 2710 | 03:46:26 --> 03:46:30 | assholes, they're trying to mentor. They know who they are. They fucking know who |
| 2711 | 03:46:30 --> 03:46:35 | they are. But my students that have made money, they have proven they've made |
| 2712 | 03:46:35 --> 03:46:39 | money, and they and I've encouraged them in Twitter spaces, live publicly in |
| 2713 | 03:46:39 --> 03:46:43 | front of everybody. Last year, I said, you have other ways of making money. |
| 2714 | 03:46:43 --> 03:46:49 | Okay? You may not get to the point where you're making big, big withdrawals from |
| 2715 | 03:46:49 --> 03:46:54 | your live brokerage account or through a funded account company. You may not be |
| 2716 | 03:46:54 --> 03:46:58 | able to do that real quick, but a lot of you think that that's the only way to |
| 2717 | 03:46:58 --> 03:47:06 | get there to make your ends meet. You, don't. We have a huge community, and |
| 2718 | 03:47:06 --> 03:47:09 | yes, there's a small sect of it as assholes, and they're just toxic people. |
| 2719 | 03:47:09 --> 03:47:13 | And for the most part, I think it's fun because it makes it, it livens it up for |
| 2720 | 03:47:13 --> 03:47:17 | me. Because if it was just everybody saying, Oh, I love ICTs concepts, I love |
| 2721 | 03:47:17 --> 03:47:21 | ICT, you know, he's, you know, he's the next best thing since raisin bread? |
| 2722 | 03:47:21 --> 03:47:27 | Well, you know, that's fucking boring. That's boring. So it's good that once in |
| 2723 | 03:47:27 --> 03:47:31 | a while we have folks that say, Yeah, I don't think that shit works, or this |
| 2724 | 03:47:31 --> 03:47:36 | guy's a clown, or he doesn't do this and he doesn't do that, because that causes |
| 2725 | 03:47:36 --> 03:47:42 | you to think about it. Well, wait a minute. Am I learning this because I |
| 2726 | 03:47:42 --> 03:47:47 | like the person ICT? Am I supposed to like everything about ICT to make this |
| 2727 | 03:47:47 --> 03:47:51 | stuff make money for me? Or am I really supposed to be focused on what he tells |
| 2728 | 03:47:51 --> 03:47:55 | me to do is don't worry about me. Don't worship ICT. Don't look up at ICT as a |
| 2729 | 03:47:55 --> 03:48:03 | fucking guru. I'm not your Forex Jesus. I'm not the futures Jesus. I am a man. I |
| 2730 | 03:48:03 --> 03:48:06 | am fallible. I am a sinner. I |
| 2731 | 03:48:06 --> 03:48:12 | can I can mess up, just like anybody else can. But for the folks that spend |
| 2732 | 03:48:12 --> 03:48:17 | too much time worrying about the person, me, the me, the character that I allow |
| 2733 | 03:48:17 --> 03:48:26 | for you all to see you don't realize that that is a test. It's a test. Do you |
| 2734 | 03:48:26 --> 03:48:33 | care more about image or what works? Because if you spend all the time |
| 2735 | 03:48:33 --> 03:48:38 | worrying about the person, and I've told you all along, We're not a team. If |
| 2736 | 03:48:38 --> 03:48:43 | you're on the outside of my trade, I hope you lose, and you could be a long |
| 2737 | 03:48:43 --> 03:48:48 | term student if you're on the other side of my trade, I want you to lose. That's |
| 2738 | 03:48:48 --> 03:48:53 | trading. I didn't hide it. I didn't lie about it. That's the nature of it. I'm |
| 2739 | 03:48:53 --> 03:49:01 | gonna eat if I'm on the other side of your trade, and I'm wrong, and you made |
| 2740 | 03:49:01 --> 03:49:06 | money. I'm fucking impressed by that. I'm not offended by that. I have |
| 2741 | 03:49:06 --> 03:49:10 | students have showed hey, look, you were calling for this level this day, and I |
| 2742 | 03:49:10 --> 03:49:14 | went like this. I hope you don't think, dude, I'm not taking offense to that. I |
| 2743 | 03:49:14 --> 03:49:20 | fucking, I love that. I love that. That's a fucking that's an award, that's |
| 2744 | 03:49:21 --> 03:49:26 | you need a trophy for that. I'm not offended by that, but some of you think |
| 2745 | 03:49:26 --> 03:49:29 | because I've done such a really good job of being a certain character online, |
| 2746 | 03:49:30 --> 03:49:33 | some of you think I have very thin skin. I don't give two thoughts. I really |
| 2747 | 03:49:33 --> 03:49:39 | don't. But I like that, that to push buttons. I like to get people talking. I |
| 2748 | 03:49:39 --> 03:49:44 | have mastered social media without any advertising, because I know how people |
| 2749 | 03:49:44 --> 03:49:48 | think. I know how to control what people think about me, how to inspire them to |
| 2750 | 03:49:48 --> 03:49:52 | think about certain things, how to lead them along, and how to cut them off, |
| 2751 | 03:49:53 --> 03:49:56 | give them just enough that they want more and then over deliver every time I |
| 2752 | 03:49:56 --> 03:50:01 | want to do it, everything I do is calculate. Did, except for this morning, |
| 2753 | 03:50:01 --> 03:50:07 | when this fucking OBS start up. I was I was mad. I was mad. If I keep talking, I |
| 2754 | 03:50:07 --> 03:50:13 | may get mad again, so I can't talk about but I had, I had students come to me |
| 2755 | 03:50:13 --> 03:50:17 | that are mentorship students, and they have asked me if I will let them |
| 2756 | 03:50:17 --> 03:50:21 | translate my videos in their language. And the answer is no, no. If you think |
| 2757 | 03:50:21 --> 03:50:24 | you're gonna put them on YouTube, and I know there's a couple channels that |
| 2758 | 03:50:24 --> 03:50:28 | they're they're about to get wiped out, you do not have my permission to do |
| 2759 | 03:50:28 --> 03:50:34 | that. Okay? You don't if you want to take little clips and put music around |
| 2760 | 03:50:34 --> 03:50:41 | it. I've never fucked with anybody. I've I've never done that. I don't have a |
| 2761 | 03:50:41 --> 03:50:44 | problem with that. Like, I don't look at that as, oh, that's copyright |
| 2762 | 03:50:44 --> 03:50:48 | infringement, because you're taking a small little piece of something and |
| 2763 | 03:50:48 --> 03:50:51 | you're making a little artistic little thing, and some of them are actually |
| 2764 | 03:50:51 --> 03:50:57 | kind of cool. I don't have a problem with that. But if you take my entire |
| 2765 | 03:50:57 --> 03:51:04 | lectures and you turn them into books verbatim, and you put them on Amazon, |
| 2766 | 03:51:04 --> 03:51:13 | like that's a dick move. The Dick move had a guy. It's Spanish. He put a whole |
| 2767 | 03:51:13 --> 03:51:17 | bunch. He has my pictures right from the mentorship videos. You can let me see |
| 2768 | 03:51:17 --> 03:51:20 | it. It says, I see mentorship. It's broken up like he's trying to hide it, |
| 2769 | 03:51:20 --> 03:51:26 | but I had such a huge just the obnoxious watermark with the user names and the |
| 2770 | 03:51:26 --> 03:51:30 | user groups, and it was a mess. But I had to deal because I had so many people |
| 2771 | 03:51:30 --> 03:51:34 | leaking it. And I was like, You know what? This mother fucker went out there |
| 2772 | 03:51:34 --> 03:51:39 | and went to Amazon and they published this book, and all it is is a watered |
| 2773 | 03:51:39 --> 03:51:45 | down version in Spanish of the things I say in the mentorship and it's trash. |
| 2774 | 03:51:45 --> 03:51:50 | It's literally fucking trash. So no, you don't have my permission to translate |
| 2775 | 03:51:50 --> 03:51:53 | any of my videos in your in your language and then put them on YouTube. |
| 2776 | 03:51:54 --> 03:51:58 | No, you don't have my permission to translate them and sell them in your own |
| 2777 | 03:51:58 --> 03:52:02 | country. So there you go. I don't, I don't have, I don't extend that |
| 2778 | 03:52:02 --> 03:52:08 | privilege to anybody. Do you have my blessing if you want to use the |
| 2779 | 03:52:08 --> 03:52:13 | information, get good at it. Build your model. Go out there and create a YouTube |
| 2780 | 03:52:13 --> 03:52:18 | channel where you use the model and you actually show them. This is how I trade. |
| 2781 | 03:52:18 --> 03:52:22 | And then you do it and grow the channel to whatever it could be bigger than |
| 2782 | 03:52:22 --> 03:52:26 | mine. I would support that. I would congratulate you. I would I would lift |
| 2783 | 03:52:26 --> 03:52:33 | you up. I do it with Tanja. There are others that are slowly starting to find |
| 2784 | 03:52:33 --> 03:52:37 | their groove, and when they get a little bit better at what they're doing, I'll |
| 2785 | 03:52:37 --> 03:52:40 | push them to I'll be in their their chat. Just because you're my student, |
| 2786 | 03:52:40 --> 03:52:45 | I'm not going to be in there. Rao. Rao, you cheering you on. I don't first, I |
| 2787 | 03:52:45 --> 03:52:56 | don't have time for that. But when I use the oh gosh, what's her name? Can't |
| 2788 | 03:52:56 --> 03:52:59 | think of her name. Now I'm embarrassed. I shouldn't say it like this out loud, |
| 2789 | 03:52:59 --> 03:53:02 | but because |
| 2790 | 03:53:10 --> 03:53:14 | a young Asian girl for the life of me, I cannot. I haven't looked at her channel |
| 2791 | 03:53:14 --> 03:53:19 | for such a long time. I can't remember her name, okay, but I was trying to get |
| 2792 | 03:53:19 --> 03:53:22 | my daughter to watch her and say, Look, you know she's going through the |
| 2793 | 03:53:22 --> 03:53:28 | mentorship. And there you go, see what she does and see if that inspires you. |
| 2794 | 03:53:28 --> 03:53:31 | And I have come to the conclusion my daughter's not ever going she's never |
| 2795 | 03:53:31 --> 03:53:37 | going to trade. But the I know some of you right now are screaming her name, |
| 2796 | 03:53:38 --> 03:53:41 | just can't remember her name. And I'm embarrassed. I'm sorry if you're |
| 2797 | 03:53:41 --> 03:53:45 | listening. I just I have 1000 things fighting to be in the front of the line |
| 2798 | 03:53:45 --> 03:53:51 | with my head right now, but then you have Tanja, where she's she's live |
| 2799 | 03:53:51 --> 03:53:56 | streaming, okay? And if I was her, I would have moderators in there cleaning |
| 2800 | 03:53:56 --> 03:54:01 | up her chat, because when I visit there, I see some very vulgar things said |
| 2801 | 03:54:02 --> 03:54:07 | directly to me, like, like, I'm lusting after her. I see her as like my |
| 2802 | 03:54:07 --> 03:54:11 | daughter. She's not physically and biologically my daughter. There's a lot |
| 2803 | 03:54:11 --> 03:54:15 | of people who think that she's not, but she literally looks a lot like my |
| 2804 | 03:54:15 --> 03:54:19 | daughter and her mannerisms, you know, the way she does her eyes and she talks |
| 2805 | 03:54:19 --> 03:54:24 | with her eyes, and that's one of the first things I noticed about her that |
| 2806 | 03:54:24 --> 03:54:27 | resembles my daughter, but her face structure looks like my daughter, and |
| 2807 | 03:54:28 --> 03:54:32 | she's using my stuff, and she's doing well with it. She'll she lose sometimes. |
| 2808 | 03:54:32 --> 03:54:38 | Sure she does. It's in it's an interesting thing for me to watch her go |
| 2809 | 03:54:38 --> 03:54:44 | through some of the emotional challenges when I see her trying to talk herself |
| 2810 | 03:54:44 --> 03:54:49 | out of the stress she's feeling, sometimes she doesn't do it as well as |
| 2811 | 03:54:49 --> 03:54:54 | I'd like to see her do it. She doesn't do self talk correctly. She'll say, oh, |
| 2812 | 03:54:54 --> 03:54:57 | you know, I don't care. I don't care. And she'll roll her hair back. She's sit |
| 2813 | 03:54:57 --> 03:55:02 | back in a chair. They're all tells you. That she just wants to say, Fuck it. I'm |
| 2814 | 03:55:02 --> 03:55:06 | turning it off. I'm done for today. But she knows she's live streaming. I find |
| 2815 | 03:55:06 --> 03:55:10 | that interesting. I don't find pleasure in seeing that uncomfortable part, but |
| 2816 | 03:55:10 --> 03:55:15 | that's the things that you're going to be met with. So if you're going to learn |
| 2817 | 03:55:15 --> 03:55:19 | how to trade and do really well, and you want to be a live streamer and YouTuber, |
| 2818 | 03:55:19 --> 03:55:22 | sure, you can make money doing that. Absolutely. You can make money doing it, |
| 2819 | 03:55:22 --> 03:55:26 | and you can do it without being drama. You don't have to talk that about |
| 2820 | 03:55:26 --> 03:55:31 | anybody else. You can just stay in your own lane. And that's the best way to do |
| 2821 | 03:55:31 --> 03:55:35 | it. Because if you're going to do the live streaming stuff, there's |
| 2822 | 03:55:36 --> 03:55:40 | everybody's going to come there to watch you fail. That's the that's the first |
| 2823 | 03:55:40 --> 03:55:44 | interest, they must see you fail, especially if I'm anywhere in that |
| 2824 | 03:55:44 --> 03:55:47 | equation, like if you learn my stuff, because they want to go in there and |
| 2825 | 03:55:47 --> 03:55:50 | they say, Oh yeah, ICT, stuff doesn't work. But then these people are making |
| 2826 | 03:55:50 --> 03:55:54 | money the levels I'm calling out in their chat windows. It's happening, |
| 2827 | 03:55:54 --> 03:55:58 | okay? It's they want an engagement. They want an interaction. They want a |
| 2828 | 03:55:58 --> 03:56:02 | response, either from me or the person doing the live stream. My advice would |
| 2829 | 03:56:02 --> 03:56:08 | be, don't even have a chat window. Live stream your stuff. Use the model that |
| 2830 | 03:56:08 --> 03:56:11 | you built around this concept, and let your channel grow without any drama. |
| 2831 | 03:56:11 --> 03:56:15 | Don't give a stage to trolls. Don't give a stage to people. Don't even have a |
| 2832 | 03:56:15 --> 03:56:20 | comment section on anything, because, honestly, even the good stuff is not |
| 2833 | 03:56:20 --> 03:56:25 | good for you. Too much love. Too much sugary. Like I love your channel, like |
| 2834 | 03:56:25 --> 03:56:28 | you don't need to do that. They have a little function on on the videos. It's a |
| 2835 | 03:56:28 --> 03:56:33 | thumbs up. I wish they would bring back the thumbs down. They have it there so |
| 2836 | 03:56:33 --> 03:56:38 | you can do it, but you can't see it. My Videos generally are 97 or higher |
| 2837 | 03:56:38 --> 03:56:42 | percent liked. So that means I have the same type of guys out there with your |
| 2838 | 03:56:42 --> 03:56:45 | sock fucking accounts, and they're going in there and they're doing the thumbs |
| 2839 | 03:56:45 --> 03:56:52 | down stuff, and that's okay. I mean, if I have a 70% like rate, and some of you |
| 2840 | 03:56:52 --> 03:56:55 | probably want to see it now you want, I want to see that there's that many |
| 2841 | 03:56:55 --> 03:57:01 | likes. I don't look at that stuff. But I asked, I'm sorry, the folks that asked |
| 2842 | 03:57:01 --> 03:57:04 | me in the comment section, you know, how many people do a thumbs down? Because |
| 2843 | 03:57:04 --> 03:57:11 | you can only see the thumbs up, my readings are 97% mostly 98% they're |
| 2844 | 03:57:11 --> 03:57:17 | liked. Okay, I wish that there was a thumbs down video. I wish they would |
| 2845 | 03:57:17 --> 03:57:23 | bring that back. It's not fair that if we're going to have the thumbs up, there |
| 2846 | 03:57:23 --> 03:57:29 | should be a thumbs down too. So that way you can see that a lot of the things |
| 2847 | 03:57:29 --> 03:57:33 | that people have fallen victim to when it has anything to do with me, is it's |
| 2848 | 03:57:33 --> 03:57:38 | the other people talking about me, and that ins that that influence keeps them |
| 2849 | 03:57:38 --> 03:57:43 | from ever looking at the stuff I teach. And if they catch them early with that, |
| 2850 | 03:57:44 --> 03:57:47 | they think that that's hurting me. I'm already here. You're not going to take |
| 2851 | 03:57:47 --> 03:57:51 | me out of where I'm at. I'm already here. Like I'm setting my ways. I'm |
| 2852 | 03:57:51 --> 03:57:55 | done. Nobody's changing, nothing. And you know, after this Caleb stuff, like, |
| 2853 | 03:57:56 --> 03:57:59 | if I ever make a video again, you know, who the fuck knows? I don't know. But |
| 2854 | 03:57:59 --> 03:58:05 | I'm not trying to be a YouTuber. I'm not trying to do that, but I can tell you |
| 2855 | 03:58:05 --> 03:58:10 | that if you have content that people like that your personality is is |
| 2856 | 03:58:10 --> 03:58:14 | friendly, and you're trying to be genuine. So if you are showing any kind |
| 2857 | 03:58:14 --> 03:58:19 | of emotion, that's real. And I got the most feedback when I was on Twitter with |
| 2858 | 03:58:19 --> 03:58:23 | the Twitter spaces, people are asking me to go back to that. I'm never going back |
| 2859 | 03:58:23 --> 03:58:26 | to Twitter. Yeah, I'm never going to go back to there. I'm not going to remove |
| 2860 | 03:58:26 --> 03:58:31 | my account. But I have entertained the idea of a podcast, okay? I've had |
| 2861 | 03:58:31 --> 03:58:36 | several people, several companies, come to me and, like, ask me what my thoughts |
| 2862 | 03:58:36 --> 03:58:41 | were about it. And I said, this year. I'm not going to make any decisions |
| 2863 | 03:58:41 --> 03:58:46 | about it, because I have this project here. And before Caleb stepping forward, |
| 2864 | 03:58:46 --> 03:58:51 | asking me to do this with him, I just wanted to focus on just unplugging from |
| 2865 | 03:58:51 --> 03:58:57 | social media, unplugging from YouTube, and just go back to being me before baby |
| 2866 | 03:58:57 --> 03:59:04 | pips like I just wanted to be back to that guy and, do I miss doing Twitter |
| 2867 | 03:59:04 --> 03:59:12 | spaces? I do, but I don't think it's a climate where, if I'm just going out |
| 2868 | 03:59:12 --> 03:59:18 | there saying what I tend to say, I don't want any more drama. You know, because |
| 2869 | 03:59:18 --> 03:59:22 | people in high seats, they're starting to look for people to have a high |
| 2870 | 03:59:22 --> 03:59:28 | opinion or a certain opinion, and it's not that important to me. You know, when |
| 2871 | 03:59:28 --> 03:59:34 | it's live, I have a tendency to go off the track and ramble and talk about |
| 2872 | 03:59:34 --> 03:59:38 | other things. And a lot of you really want those other topics, like you want |
| 2873 | 03:59:38 --> 03:59:42 | the tin foil hat stuff. You want the stories of me going through stuff, and |
| 2874 | 03:59:42 --> 03:59:46 | sometimes when I get emotional, you've heard me cry. You hear me cackle and |
| 2875 | 03:59:46 --> 03:59:53 | laugh when I'm going on. I laugh at my own jokes. I've learned that those |
| 2876 | 03:59:53 --> 03:59:58 | elements where I was allowing my emotions, where if you listen to the old |
| 2877 | 03:59:58 --> 04:00:02 | videos, where I'm just droning on. And it says monotone and boring. I'm not |
| 2878 | 04:00:02 --> 04:00:06 | showing any kind of emotion at all. They're great for lullabies. They'll put |
| 2879 | 04:00:06 --> 04:00:10 | you to sleep, but if you listen, you probably can't sleep through a Twitter |
| 2880 | 04:00:10 --> 04:00:15 | space, because invariably, I'm going to go off and I'm going to, you know, |
| 2881 | 04:00:15 --> 04:00:19 | elevate and animate myself. And I've done it a couple times. Some of it was |
| 2882 | 04:00:19 --> 04:00:23 | scripted, where I wanted to do it for shock value, and other times it's just |
| 2883 | 04:00:23 --> 04:00:30 | organic, and I would swing from one spectrum to the next, and that part of |
| 2884 | 04:00:30 --> 04:00:34 | me, I wanted to hide that from the poet, like I didn't want, I didn't want people |
| 2885 | 04:00:35 --> 04:00:42 | criticizing me over that aspect. And I found that because of that aspect and |
| 2886 | 04:00:42 --> 04:00:48 | being real and genuine and letting it be organic. That's the part that people |
| 2887 | 04:00:48 --> 04:00:53 | like the most out of everything that I put out in content. They like the |
| 2888 | 04:00:53 --> 04:00:58 | lectures where I'm like that, where it's not stunted and stilted and wooden, and |
| 2889 | 04:00:58 --> 04:01:02 | maybe you hear me talk about a painful moment, and I end up, you know, showing |
| 2890 | 04:01:02 --> 04:01:06 | my emotions where I would have never been comfortable doing that. You know, |
| 2891 | 04:01:06 --> 04:01:11 | when baby pips, I had new interest in that. But my advice to someone that |
| 2892 | 04:01:11 --> 04:01:15 | wants to learn how to do this, and if you're contemplating doing and you |
| 2893 | 04:01:15 --> 04:01:18 | already know how to trade well with it and consistently, doesn't mean you trade |
| 2894 | 04:01:18 --> 04:01:23 | every day profitably, but you're, you're making money over the year, and you want |
| 2895 | 04:01:23 --> 04:01:29 | to get another income. I think that if it's in your personality to do so, and |
| 2896 | 04:01:29 --> 04:01:33 | you're comfortable being open and transparent, I think that live |
| 2897 | 04:01:33 --> 04:01:37 | streaming, like that stuff saying, Here's my model. You're not trying to |
| 2898 | 04:01:37 --> 04:01:41 | sell the course or the model. Okay, you're saying, This is what I'm doing, |
| 2899 | 04:01:42 --> 04:01:47 | and me implementing it and using it in front of you, win or loss. That's the |
| 2900 | 04:01:47 --> 04:01:52 | content. That's that's why I'm doing this. I'm doing it because it's going to |
| 2901 | 04:01:52 --> 04:01:55 | give me another stream of income if I'm liked by other people. And it doesn't |
| 2902 | 04:01:55 --> 04:01:58 | matter if people come and watch me, I'm going to be trading anyway. So if you go |
| 2903 | 04:01:58 --> 04:02:02 | in with that mentality, and you're not out there trying to talk about everybody |
| 2904 | 04:02:02 --> 04:02:06 | else. See, I talk about methodologies. I don't talk about people. I don't point |
| 2905 | 04:02:06 --> 04:02:11 | at people because I don't have a problem really personally with anybody. I know |
| 2906 | 04:02:11 --> 04:02:14 | people don't like me. I know that they've done terrible things and said |
| 2907 | 04:02:14 --> 04:02:20 | terrible things about me. Threaten this and threaten that. I get it okay, but |
| 2908 | 04:02:20 --> 04:02:24 | that's not changing shit. It's not doing anything. It's not going to change me |
| 2909 | 04:02:24 --> 04:02:28 | who I am. I'm not a drama person on a family level, on a personal I don't do |
| 2910 | 04:02:28 --> 04:02:29 | those types of things, |
| 2911 | 04:02:30 --> 04:02:35 | but I can talk shit about your methodology, and if you take odds with |
| 2912 | 04:02:35 --> 04:02:38 | that, then that's great, because that's the that's the button I'm pushing, |
| 2913 | 04:02:39 --> 04:02:42 | because I want that person, whoever that is, and it could be a lot of you did you |
| 2914 | 04:02:42 --> 04:02:47 | go to go out there and defend it. If you champion that stuff, you'll go out there |
| 2915 | 04:02:47 --> 04:02:51 | and champion it. You'll go out and call it live explain it. And you don't have |
| 2916 | 04:02:51 --> 04:02:56 | to even do a demo camp, just explain it real time as it's happening. I like |
| 2917 | 04:02:56 --> 04:03:00 | watching people do that, and it doesn't have to be my stuff, because if you know |
| 2918 | 04:03:00 --> 04:03:04 | what you're doing and you're comfortable in your own skin, and you're not trying |
| 2919 | 04:03:04 --> 04:03:10 | to be something that, you're not trying to pretend to be something superior, but |
| 2920 | 04:03:10 --> 04:03:13 | really not doing anything, you're not going to grow you're not going to get an |
| 2921 | 04:03:13 --> 04:03:17 | audience. You're not going to you're not going to be able to retain that. But if |
| 2922 | 04:03:17 --> 04:03:22 | you do the things that I have discovered are actually what people want. If you |
| 2923 | 04:03:22 --> 04:03:26 | have something that works, and my stuff works, you have to find it where it |
| 2924 | 04:03:26 --> 04:03:29 | works for you, though. You have to have a model that's comfortable for you, |
| 2925 | 04:03:29 --> 04:03:33 | trading a time of day, an instrument that's conducive for you to feel |
| 2926 | 04:03:34 --> 04:03:37 | comfortable. You're not trying to reinvent anything. You're not trying to |
| 2927 | 04:03:37 --> 04:03:40 | amplify or make it better or tweak it that way. You can say, well, I took this |
| 2928 | 04:03:40 --> 04:03:43 | and made it better. That's what everybody wants. Everybody wants to do |
| 2929 | 04:03:43 --> 04:03:47 | that, and you don't need to do that. I have so many weapons. All you gotta do |
| 2930 | 04:03:47 --> 04:03:54 | is say, You know what? I like the katana, I like the bo staff, I like the |
| 2931 | 04:03:54 --> 04:04:01 | side, I like the nunchuck, I like the shuriken, I like the Takagi. These are |
| 2932 | 04:04:01 --> 04:04:06 | all weapons. Okay, no one weapon is better than the other in the hands of |
| 2933 | 04:04:06 --> 04:04:10 | someone that knows how to use them formidably. You don't want to be dealing |
| 2934 | 04:04:10 --> 04:04:15 | with that. It's a bad day. So if you go through the motions of going through, |
| 2935 | 04:04:16 --> 04:04:20 | what is it I teach? The first thing is how to read price. Where's it going, why |
| 2936 | 04:04:20 --> 04:04:24 | is it going and when's it going to move? That's your first that's your first |
| 2937 | 04:04:24 --> 04:04:29 | level. But then you find a model that tells you how to get in and where to |
| 2938 | 04:04:29 --> 04:04:34 | look for a trade exit point and where to stop loss is. That's your model. That's |
| 2939 | 04:04:34 --> 04:04:38 | it. That's a very simple thing. What makes it hard is you're trying to figure |
| 2940 | 04:04:38 --> 04:04:42 | out which one's the better one. And if you're going to be honest, that's what |
| 2941 | 04:04:42 --> 04:04:46 | you're all struggling with. You're listening to so many influencers and |
| 2942 | 04:04:46 --> 04:04:50 | other people that said they study with me. Oh, it doesn't work. I now I'm doing |
| 2943 | 04:04:50 --> 04:04:56 | this. Oh, he complicate. I don't complicate shit. But it is a complicated |
| 2944 | 04:04:56 --> 04:04:58 | matter for you to settle in on what you're comfortable with, because you |
| 2945 | 04:04:58 --> 04:05:04 | have to sit down and go through. Motions of figuring out what makes you tick. Can |
| 2946 | 04:05:04 --> 04:05:09 | you trade against the grain and be a trader that goes short up here? I'm |
| 2947 | 04:05:09 --> 04:05:12 | gonna bet money that most of you aren't doing that. Can you grow into that yet? |
| 2948 | 04:05:12 --> 04:05:17 | It's that's what I had. It took years and years and years me to do that long |
| 2949 | 04:05:17 --> 04:05:25 | time, but being a part of a move that's easy to see and engaging that that's |
| 2950 | 04:05:25 --> 04:05:31 | easy stuff. That's why I say entries are easy. Targets are easy. They're all |
| 2951 | 04:05:31 --> 04:05:35 | finite things. But knowing where the market's going to go, that's the |
| 2952 | 04:05:35 --> 04:05:41 | uncertainty that evades most traders. And for the ones that know where it's |
| 2953 | 04:05:41 --> 04:05:46 | likely to go. Where do they mess up? They mess up by trying to force too many |
| 2954 | 04:05:46 --> 04:05:51 | things in their model, and it gets analysis paralysis. I know where it's |
| 2955 | 04:05:51 --> 04:05:56 | going, but I'm afraid if I take this one and then I see something else forming, |
| 2956 | 04:05:56 --> 04:06:00 | and then I'm trying to do too sort of a stop loss. It's trying to be too tight, |
| 2957 | 04:06:00 --> 04:06:04 | because I'm trading with too much leverage, right? There's your problem |
| 2958 | 04:06:05 --> 04:06:10 | trade with one contract, because if you can't double your account with one |
| 2959 | 04:06:10 --> 04:06:15 | contract, you sure as fucking doing it with 15 and five or whatever else you |
| 2960 | 04:06:15 --> 04:06:18 | think you're gonna do, you're not gonna do it. All you're doing is amplifying |
| 2961 | 04:06:18 --> 04:06:25 | the stress and the problem of holding onto a trade while you're in that with |
| 2962 | 04:06:25 --> 04:06:31 | over leveraged contract size or lot size, if you're in forex, you're going |
| 2963 | 04:06:31 --> 04:06:35 | to care more about the fluctuations of profit and loss. It's taking money from |
| 2964 | 04:06:35 --> 04:06:38 | me. It's putting money in there. I'm going to new equity high in the trade. |
| 2965 | 04:06:38 --> 04:06:42 | Oh shit, I gave back half of the trade. I probably should have got out now |
| 2966 | 04:06:42 --> 04:06:45 | you're worried about something that's probably never going to be a factor. If |
| 2967 | 04:06:45 --> 04:06:50 | you had one lot on or one contract as a futures trader, that retracement here, |
| 2968 | 04:06:50 --> 04:06:53 | like if you were short here and you watched the trade back up to there, |
| 2969 | 04:06:53 --> 04:06:58 | that's about 50% of a retracement on an open position. I'm not fearful of that. |
| 2970 | 04:06:59 --> 04:07:05 | That's why I'm not in a rush to push my trades real fast, taking my stop loss, |
| 2971 | 04:07:05 --> 04:07:10 | jamming it into a certain measure of guaranteeing big, big profit, because I |
| 2972 | 04:07:10 --> 04:07:16 | know the first return after a nice entry can go as much as 60% of a retracement, |
| 2973 | 04:07:16 --> 04:07:20 | meaning that it could trade right back to the area I entered at. And that |
| 2974 | 04:07:20 --> 04:07:24 | doesn't change anything. It just means that, hey, that might be an opportunity |
| 2975 | 04:07:24 --> 04:07:30 | for to add another portion on. Or, okay, is it really spending too much time back |
| 2976 | 04:07:30 --> 04:07:34 | at that 60% or a trace, or more than 50% of what I've already seen as an |
| 2977 | 04:07:34 --> 04:07:38 | unrealized gain? In other words, if I'm in the trade and I say, I make it easy, |
| 2978 | 04:07:38 --> 04:07:42 | say, I have $1,000 in open profit, but it's not been realized or closed and |
| 2979 | 04:07:42 --> 04:07:48 | then it retraces against me, back where I'm down over 500 hours up in open |
| 2980 | 04:07:48 --> 04:07:51 | profit, but not realized I didn't close the trade. It hasn't gone back to my |
| 2981 | 04:07:51 --> 04:07:56 | stop loss. It hasn't gone below profit, but I'm now only up 450 bucks or |
| 2982 | 04:07:56 --> 04:08:01 | whatever. That doesn't make me second guess the trade or change my mind about |
| 2983 | 04:08:01 --> 04:08:08 | the trade, I better get out. And I'm going to count to you to watch this |
| 2984 | 04:08:08 --> 04:08:11 | portion where I was covering all this stuff in here today, where it kind of |
| 2985 | 04:08:11 --> 04:08:22 | helps you formulate a process or a mindset on anticipating this ebb and |
| 2986 | 04:08:22 --> 04:08:25 | flow, this give and take that the market's going to do while you're in a |
| 2987 | 04:08:25 --> 04:08:29 | trade. And if you don't get accustomed to seeing some of that profit come back |
| 2988 | 04:08:29 --> 04:08:33 | into the marketplace and come out of your account, and trust that that's a |
| 2989 | 04:08:33 --> 04:08:38 | normal process. It's normal for that to happen. We all want these types of |
| 2990 | 04:08:38 --> 04:08:42 | trades where you get short here and it just runs away quick. It doesn't have |
| 2991 | 04:08:42 --> 04:08:46 | any retracing at all ever. Every new equity high stays there and adds more to |
| 2992 | 04:08:46 --> 04:08:51 | it until the trade hits the limit order and you get out. That's not realistic. |
| 2993 | 04:08:51 --> 04:08:58 | But I have found that when I was giving my examples, people would say, I see |
| 2994 | 04:08:58 --> 04:09:02 | your examples and I want my trades that pan out like yours, but they don't |
| 2995 | 04:09:02 --> 04:09:06 | realize is I was speeding them up because I had to force them on Twitter |
| 2996 | 04:09:06 --> 04:09:09 | inside of one minute and 20 seconds, because that was the time limit I had to |
| 2997 | 04:09:09 --> 04:09:14 | have for those those trade videos to be shown. So I'd condense, sometimes an |
| 2998 | 04:09:14 --> 04:09:18 | hour, maybe 45 minutes, a 30 minute trade. I would speed it up not because |
| 2999 | 04:09:18 --> 04:09:21 | I'm hiding anything. There's nothing to hide. It's all there. You can see it, |
| 3000 | 04:09:23 --> 04:09:28 | but it had to be forced into a small space of time. And then I would record a |
| 3001 | 04:09:28 --> 04:09:31 | song and place it on top of it. But because they would watch those videos, |
| 3002 | 04:09:31 --> 04:09:35 | it was actually and I didn't realize it until after most people were coming back |
| 3003 | 04:09:35 --> 04:09:38 | to me and giving me this feedback, they would say, Well, you know, I'm in these |
| 3004 | 04:09:38 --> 04:09:42 | trades, and it's hard for me to hold why? Because you watch my trade videos |
| 3005 | 04:09:42 --> 04:09:51 | in the span of a truncated song of 120 seconds, you're expecting your profit |
| 3006 | 04:09:51 --> 04:09:55 | objectives to be met in very super, hyper speeds. Because what are you |
| 3007 | 04:09:55 --> 04:09:59 | watching? You're you're activating your reticular activating system, seeing the. |
| 3008 | 04:10:00 --> 04:10:04 | Things happen on a sped up chart with a real execution in live market |
| 3009 | 04:10:04 --> 04:10:11 | conditions, not always a demo. Sometimes it was in a amp account. Sometimes it |
| 3010 | 04:10:11 --> 04:10:16 | was in a TD Ameritrade account. They're real brokers. That's not That's not a |
| 3011 | 04:10:16 --> 04:10:22 | paper trading account that was real. But these videos, these examples, because |
| 3012 | 04:10:22 --> 04:10:26 | they were sped up. You're being entertained because it's me doing |
| 3013 | 04:10:26 --> 04:10:29 | execution. You're being entertained because there's a song in a lot of not |
| 3014 | 04:10:29 --> 04:10:34 | everybody, but a lot of people say, I like your song choices, and then you're |
| 3015 | 04:10:34 --> 04:10:38 | watching the duration of it. So what are you taking in? Your subconscious is |
| 3016 | 04:10:38 --> 04:10:45 | saying, when I take a trade, I'm going to have that fast run, and I no longer |
| 3017 | 04:10:45 --> 04:10:48 | want to do those type of videos, because the feedback I got, nobody was |
| 3018 | 04:10:48 --> 04:10:53 | complaining about that video or those videos. They were saying, please give us |
| 3019 | 04:10:53 --> 04:10:58 | more. But what I was getting back in the comment section or emails, they would |
| 3020 | 04:10:58 --> 04:11:03 | say, I've watched your videos, and I'm inspired by that, but when I get into a |
| 3021 | 04:11:03 --> 04:11:07 | trade, it's just I can't hold on to them, because I don't have the patience. |
| 3022 | 04:11:07 --> 04:11:12 | And I realized I'm probably a very large contributing factor to that, because of |
| 3023 | 04:11:12 --> 04:11:18 | the the the way I was giving that sped up example, I thought I was doing |
| 3024 | 04:11:18 --> 04:11:22 | something cool, and I still think it's cool, but through the lens of a new |
| 3025 | 04:11:22 --> 04:11:26 | student, for someone that's brand new, that's never really done it before, it |
| 3026 | 04:11:26 --> 04:11:32 | kind of like without not being the intended purpose, it has an effect on |
| 3027 | 04:11:32 --> 04:11:36 | them by framing an expectation in terms of the duration, of how these traits can |
| 3028 | 04:11:36 --> 04:11:40 | pan out. It makes it feel like they're going to be very fast. And if you |
| 3029 | 04:11:40 --> 04:11:45 | realize that a lot of those videos were longer than 40 minutes in duration, |
| 3030 | 04:11:46 --> 04:11:52 | they're not all smart money concepts delivered in five minutes. It's you're |
| 3031 | 04:11:52 --> 04:11:56 | trading an hour's range. Okay? And here's a nudge, nudge, hint, hint for |
| 3032 | 04:11:56 --> 04:12:00 | you. But the point is, these moves, these runs, because I've sped them up |
| 3033 | 04:12:00 --> 04:12:04 | for the purpose of fitting into the bandwidth and time constraints that |
| 3034 | 04:12:04 --> 04:12:10 | Twitter placed on me and adding a song to it, I supercharged the allure around |
| 3035 | 04:12:10 --> 04:12:15 | it, and I showed the stuff working. But you're getting trained, |
| 3036 | 04:12:16 --> 04:12:21 | you know, indirectly, but not by design, to anticipate the trades, painting out |
| 3037 | 04:12:21 --> 04:12:27 | just like that, in speed for you, based on time. And it was something that no |
| 3038 | 04:12:27 --> 04:12:32 | one complained about, but I have come to the conclusion that that is the large |
| 3039 | 04:12:32 --> 04:12:37 | contributing factor. Because what else would it be? What else would it be? |
| 3040 | 04:12:38 --> 04:12:43 | Because, if you're seeing the trade examples, and 95% of them were always |
| 3041 | 04:12:43 --> 04:12:49 | sped up and shown on Twitter. It was a main it was a it was a way for me to |
| 3042 | 04:12:49 --> 04:12:53 | inspire you to say this stuff works. This is what it looks like. Go through |
| 3043 | 04:12:53 --> 04:12:57 | your charts and find the same information. But mostly it was just |
| 3044 | 04:12:57 --> 04:13:00 | people watching it for entertainment value and saying, I'm inspired. I'm |
| 3045 | 04:13:00 --> 04:13:05 | gonna go out and try to trade like that, and then they're uncomfortable because |
| 3046 | 04:13:05 --> 04:13:08 | now they're in it. It's been 30 seconds. It's been two minutes and 50 seconds. |
| 3047 | 04:13:09 --> 04:13:13 | It's twice as long as the time limit that they are used to watching my trades |
| 3048 | 04:13:13 --> 04:13:20 | pan out because they've been sped up just to make it fit the time window that |
| 3049 | 04:13:20 --> 04:13:23 | Twitter videos, because of my membership, or whatever the limitations |
| 3050 | 04:13:23 --> 04:13:26 | were, it used to be just that was the limit. You couldn't go beyond, like one |
| 3051 | 04:13:26 --> 04:13:30 | minute 20 seconds. So my event, my videos would always be like one minute |
| 3052 | 04:13:30 --> 04:13:33 | 19 seconds or whatever. And sometimes they would reject the video and have to |
| 3053 | 04:13:33 --> 04:13:37 | compress it again to just get below that. Their their little limit they |
| 3054 | 04:13:37 --> 04:13:40 | would have on me. And my understanding is, I think you can make a longer video |
| 3055 | 04:13:40 --> 04:13:44 | now, but I don't give a shit. I'm not making those videos anymore. So I've |
| 3056 | 04:13:44 --> 04:13:48 | learned a lot as a mentor like I've taken things that were directly given to |
| 3057 | 04:13:48 --> 04:13:54 | me as feedback. I've looked at things that I've felt like I was doing a good |
| 3058 | 04:13:54 --> 04:13:58 | thing, and other people didn't realize it. And I'm saying it now, maybe some of |
| 3059 | 04:13:58 --> 04:14:00 | you might think to yourself, yeah, it makes sense. It probably was a |
| 3060 | 04:14:00 --> 04:14:04 | contributing factor. And now I got to stop thinking about that. The trade has |
| 3061 | 04:14:04 --> 04:14:08 | to pan out fast, and I have to submit the time, which was the very first thing |
| 3062 | 04:14:08 --> 04:14:11 | I taught when I was on baby pips, just relax. You got to submit the process, |
| 3063 | 04:14:11 --> 04:14:15 | submit to the time. It's going to take you much longer, and your trade doesn't |
| 3064 | 04:14:15 --> 04:14:20 | have to go fast to your target. It's fun when it does it's absolutely fun when it |
| 3065 | 04:14:20 --> 04:14:25 | does that, but it doesn't have to do that. Doesn't have to do those things to |
| 3066 | 04:14:25 --> 04:14:32 | be profitable. So anyway, I've said a lot of stuff today. I'm hungry. It's |
| 3067 | 04:14:32 --> 04:14:36 | almost two o'clock. I've given you a whole lot of information, and I'll |
| 3068 | 04:14:36 --> 04:14:43 | probably talk to you through your your mundane workday. I probably kept you up |
| 3069 | 04:14:43 --> 04:14:47 | in in other countries, thinking, I must see what this. Stop talking. I'm afraid |
| 3070 | 04:14:47 --> 04:14:52 | I'm gonna miss something. You're not gonna miss anything. Okay, it's all |
| 3071 | 04:14:52 --> 04:14:59 | going to be in in the replay. But I've had fun today. I'm hungry. I'm going to |
| 3072 | 04:14:59 --> 04:15:02 | close. This one, I'm going to wish you all very pleasant day, evening, |
| 3073 | 04:15:02 --> 04:15:06 | whatever, and Lord willing, until I'll talk to you tomorrow. Hopefully, I'm |
| 3074 | 04:15:06 --> 04:15:10 | going to try to, I'm going to try to start the stream early, but it'll, it'll |
| 3075 | 04:15:10 --> 04:15:15 | sit there with my mug looking at you, just to make sure that I got everything |
| 3076 | 04:15:15 --> 04:15:21 | going on that way. It hopefully at 915 it'll, it'll go off without any hitch. |
| 3077 | 04:15:21 --> 04:15:25 | But today was a very technically challenging day for me. It wouldn't |
| 3078 | 04:15:25 --> 04:15:29 | comply. It wouldn't work with me. So I took me out of my my train of thought, |
| 3079 | 04:15:29 --> 04:15:33 | but I think I salvaded Good one today. I gave you a lot of information. I covered |
| 3080 | 04:15:33 --> 04:15:38 | the turtle soup stuff I wanted to talk about, and everything else is there. I'm |
| 3081 | 04:15:38 --> 04:15:42 | going to try. I can't promise it, it's going to be successful, because, you |
| 3082 | 04:15:42 --> 04:15:46 | know, I tend to go on a rant, and every time I say we're going to close it, we |
| 3083 | 04:15:46 --> 04:15:50 | go another hour. Keep going ITP, you said four o'clock. We're here for it, |
| 3084 | 04:15:50 --> 04:15:59 | baby. But the the the live streams as I go through and progress on different |
| 3085 | 04:15:59 --> 04:16:05 | subject matter, I'm going to try to be mindful of transitions from one subject |
| 3086 | 04:16:05 --> 04:16:12 | matter to the next. I know these are very, very long catalogs of information. |
| 3087 | 04:16:12 --> 04:16:17 | So what I'm entertaining the idea of, I'm not promising I'm going to do this. |
| 3088 | 04:16:17 --> 04:16:22 | I'm entertaining the idea that might, that means I might try to do it going |
| 3089 | 04:16:22 --> 04:16:27 | forward when I talk about specific elements of the discussion, like, for |
| 3090 | 04:16:27 --> 04:16:31 | instance, when we were talking about the turtle soup aspect, okay, you know, |
| 3091 | 04:16:31 --> 04:16:34 | yesterday, I was going to talk about that as a subject matter today, but I |
| 3092 | 04:16:34 --> 04:16:37 | didn't go right into that subject matter because we were watching live price |
| 3093 | 04:16:37 --> 04:16:41 | action. I was giving you counseling over what to expect, but not to expect. |
| 3094 | 04:16:41 --> 04:16:44 | Telling my son, this is what you're looking for. This is what's good. This |
| 3095 | 04:16:44 --> 04:16:48 | is what's not good. All those things being germane to the discussion and why |
| 3096 | 04:16:48 --> 04:16:54 | I'm even doing the live streams. But I want to, kind of like write down the |
| 3097 | 04:16:54 --> 04:16:59 | time when I transition from one subject to the to the next, and then I will give |
| 3098 | 04:16:59 --> 04:17:04 | you in a comment underneath the live stream, or maybe in the description. |
| 3099 | 04:17:04 --> 04:17:09 | I'll give you a breakdown of, you know, what I'm covering in there. If you are |
| 3100 | 04:17:09 --> 04:17:15 | one of my students that have the always done this with my videos, I have some |
| 3101 | 04:17:15 --> 04:17:19 | students that literally will give you the minute marker of every fucking video |
| 3102 | 04:17:19 --> 04:17:23 | I've ever made and what I was talking about like they're, they're amazing at |
| 3103 | 04:17:23 --> 04:17:27 | it. They catalog and index things so well, but they were doing it for |
| 3104 | 04:17:27 --> 04:17:33 | themselves. And sometimes I would, I would promote those, those comments in, |
| 3105 | 04:17:33 --> 04:17:37 | in the in the videos, so that way people can say, Okay, well, he they're doing it |
| 3106 | 04:17:37 --> 04:17:41 | for themselves, but I'm going to borrow that so that way everybody can see this |
| 3107 | 04:17:41 --> 04:17:44 | is where I'm talking about that. That was actually a cool thing. I didn't |
| 3108 | 04:17:44 --> 04:17:48 | really go through and verify all that stuff. So what I'm going to do is ask |
| 3109 | 04:17:48 --> 04:17:51 | you all as the community, not that all of you need to do it. Okay? It's not a |
| 3110 | 04:17:51 --> 04:17:54 | homework assignment, because there's a lot of things going on the world, and |
| 3111 | 04:17:54 --> 04:17:57 | there's enough for you to go through with the content. But for people that |
| 3112 | 04:17:57 --> 04:18:00 | just do this anyway, and you write down and you log where I talk about certain |
| 3113 | 04:18:00 --> 04:18:05 | things in these long videos and these long, long live streams, if you're |
| 3114 | 04:18:05 --> 04:18:09 | willing to, you can leave that type of information. Just leave the title and |
| 3115 | 04:18:09 --> 04:18:14 | the date of the live stream, just comment and reply to whatever the most |
| 3116 | 04:18:14 --> 04:18:20 | recent community post is. Because when I look at the posts, I just go through all |
| 3117 | 04:18:20 --> 04:18:24 | the video posts that say for review. All my comments generally are for review, so |
| 3118 | 04:18:24 --> 04:18:30 | I can go through and see what people are saying. And if I, if I get a if I get at |
| 3119 | 04:18:30 --> 04:18:32 | least two or three of you saying that, this is generally where I'm changing |
| 3120 | 04:18:32 --> 04:18:35 | gears. And I'm talking about, this is where he starts talking about turtle |
| 3121 | 04:18:35 --> 04:18:38 | suit, and this is where he's talking about entry strategies. This is where he |
| 3122 | 04:18:38 --> 04:18:42 | talks about stop loss placement and how to use smaller stop losses. I cover |
| 3123 | 04:18:42 --> 04:18:47 | those things today. Okay? And I know that there are people that are trying to |
| 3124 | 04:18:47 --> 04:18:51 | spoon feed the people that don't want to sit and listen to the entire thing. So |
| 3125 | 04:18:51 --> 04:18:55 | I'm going to strangle them, okay? Because they're trying to make YouTube |
| 3126 | 04:18:55 --> 04:19:01 | channels of splicing right to the nuggets. Okay? I'm going to cancel that |
| 3127 | 04:19:01 --> 04:19:06 | whole necessity for that by putting timestamps in these long winded |
| 3128 | 04:19:06 --> 04:19:11 | presentations. So that way you can go in by index and say, Okay, this is the |
| 3129 | 04:19:11 --> 04:19:14 | video. He talks about, this, this, this, this, and I can click on it. I'm not |
| 3130 | 04:19:14 --> 04:19:17 | saying I'm going to go through the business of going in and doing the |
| 3131 | 04:19:17 --> 04:19:22 | hyperlinks right to that, that minute marker, but I would appreciate it if |
| 3132 | 04:19:23 --> 04:19:26 | some of you want to help in this regard, it doesn't mean I'm going to make your |
| 3133 | 04:19:26 --> 04:19:31 | comment visible. It just means that, you know, if you're already doing it, don't |
| 3134 | 04:19:31 --> 04:19:34 | start doing it. If you don't want to do it, okay. But if you're already doing |
| 3135 | 04:19:34 --> 04:19:38 | it, if you want to make that available to me in the comment section, it would |
| 3136 | 04:19:38 --> 04:19:43 | be a personal matter of me appreciating that and saying thank you for your your |
| 3137 | 04:19:43 --> 04:19:47 | assistance with it. But going forward, I intend to do that, but for the ones that |
| 3138 | 04:19:47 --> 04:19:50 | we've already done, it's been six. This is the sixth live stream. I think, yeah, |
| 3139 | 04:19:50 --> 04:19:55 | sixth 1/6, one. So the sixth, the fifth, fourth, third and two, first one. |
| 3140 | 04:19:56 --> 04:20:00 | Whenever I'm changing subject matter or I'm amplifying something, and then. And |
| 3141 | 04:20:00 --> 04:20:04 | return back to something that was being discussed earlier, I would be beneficial |
| 3142 | 04:20:04 --> 04:20:08 | to other people, because I get a lot of questions, and they think I have a index |
| 3143 | 04:20:08 --> 04:20:12 | of what video, what time in the video. I don't do that shit, but I can see a use |
| 3144 | 04:20:12 --> 04:20:17 | for it, because I am very long winded, because I'm giving a clinic, like I'm |
| 3145 | 04:20:17 --> 04:20:21 | literally writing books audibly, like I'm doing an audio fucking book every |
| 3146 | 04:20:21 --> 04:20:26 | day with you all. I'm literally giving that much information. And you think |
| 3147 | 04:20:26 --> 04:20:29 | it's just a small amount of information. You could cut this down to five minutes. |
| 3148 | 04:20:29 --> 04:20:34 | The fuck I can. Okay, you can't. You cannot do today's lecture in a small |
| 3149 | 04:20:34 --> 04:20:38 | little span of time, because there's so many things that are contributing |
| 3150 | 04:20:38 --> 04:20:43 | elements to it. And yeah, I have a lot of fluff and talking in it, but you |
| 3151 | 04:20:43 --> 04:20:46 | still can't reduce it down to a very small video. There has to be other |
| 3152 | 04:20:46 --> 04:20:49 | things, and you're going to need other videos and lectures where I've done |
| 3153 | 04:20:49 --> 04:20:55 | other discussions to amplify and further explain what you don't fully understand |
| 3154 | 04:20:55 --> 04:20:59 | just because I talked about it or mentioned it briefly here, like the |
| 3155 | 04:20:59 --> 04:21:02 | breaker, if you've never seen the breaker before, what the hell's a |
| 3156 | 04:21:02 --> 04:21:06 | breaker? Where is the breaker's entry mechanism? What validates it as a |
| 3157 | 04:21:06 --> 04:21:09 | breaker? These are all questions you probably if you've never heard it, |
| 3158 | 04:21:09 --> 04:21:12 | you're like, Okay, what is a breaker? Where can I find information on a |
| 3159 | 04:21:12 --> 04:21:15 | breaker? How do you trade a breaker? You know what validates a breaker? What |
| 3160 | 04:21:15 --> 04:21:20 | invalidates a breaker? So I know the questions you're going to come up with, |
| 3161 | 04:21:21 --> 04:21:26 | but they're already answered in other videos that you should have already |
| 3162 | 04:21:26 --> 04:21:29 | watched before watching this one. But you can't be that way if you just |
| 3163 | 04:21:29 --> 04:21:32 | discover the channel. So you got to take it in bite sized pieces and just know |
| 3164 | 04:21:32 --> 04:21:38 | that they're in the mentorship videos, the 2016 and 2017 playlists on this |
| 3165 | 04:21:38 --> 04:21:43 | YouTube channel. Go through them, okay, and that's it. I'm going to get off |
| 3166 | 04:21:43 --> 04:21:47 | here. I wish you all very pleasant day. I had fun. Hope you learned something. |
| 3167 | 04:21:47 --> 04:21:50 | If you did, if you liked it, enjoy it. Give me a thumbs up. That's our currency |
| 3168 | 04:21:50 --> 04:21:55 | here. There's no There's no PayPal links required, and I'll talk to you tomorrow. |
| 3169 | 04:21:55 --> 04:21:56 | Lord willing. Till then, be safe. You. |