ICT YT - 2023-01-19 - ICT Emini Futures Review - January 18 2023
Last modified by Drunk Monkey on 2023-01-19 09:20
Outline
00:01 - The only imbalance in the market is in the candles.
02:38 - Introduction to today’s episode.
07:56 - When you don’t have a clear-cut directional bias, you have to wait for more information.
13:00 - What’s going on in the futures market.
18:57 - The algorithm is not limited to intraday charts.
21:09 - What is the fair value gap? -.
26:23 - When you take a step back and look at things like it really is.
31:40 - How do you know when you’re in alignment with the algorithm?
36:50 - Why didn't you see this happening and why did you didn't see it?
41:10 - Why the short-term low was not taken out until here.
48:39 - One Minute Chart -.
55:11 - How to use the fair value gap.
59:48 - Fear of a Gap from the 5 Minute Chart.
01:02:29 - Support resistance around daily highs and lows.
01:08:12 - What’s the chances of a trader meeting another trader at the midpoint of the fair value gap?
01:13:55 - The importance of focusing on one thing at a time.
Transcription
| 1 | 00:00:01,140 --> 00:00:15,660 | ICT: into London, or tomorrow morning. The only imbalance is if you look on the daily chart on January 11, Wednesday, that big up candle. If you look at the |
| 2 | 00:00:15,660 --> 00:00:25,320 | candle to the right of it on Thursday, January 12, that candles low, and on the candle of January 10, that candles high, there's a small little Faraday gap |
| 3 | 00:00:25,320 --> 00:00:40,020 | there. If we were to drop down, and that's, that's a considerable drop, that would be an area for me to watch. Because also about midpoint of that wick. On |
| 4 | 00:00:40,020 --> 00:00:52,650 | the ninth of January, notice that halfway between the high and the open of January 9, this candle on the daily chart of ES H 2023. Halfway between that |
| 5 | 00:00:52,650 --> 00:01:04,380 | with time, and the open price of that candle in the night is essentially the high of January 10. I do those little videos like that, I don't need to do these |
| 6 | 00:01:04,380 --> 00:01:15,990 | videos, I enjoy them, I could just make them and have no annotations and just trade in, I would entertain myself, but you would get nothing from it. I |
| 7 | 00:01:15,990 --> 00:01:24,090 | annotate them so that we you can go into your charts and dig into those areas on even a smaller timeframe or go up to a higher timeframe. See what those those |
| 8 | 00:01:24,090 --> 00:01:37,020 | levels provided in terms of the things I teach. So when I say gun to my head in this situation, I would favor the market trading down into path of the wick on |
| 9 | 00:01:37,020 --> 00:01:49,260 | the 13th of January Friday 13th. So on your daily chart, you should take your Fibonacci I'm gonna do this now so that we can make sure you're doing it right. |
| 10 | 00:01:49,920 --> 00:02:04,320 | Every Fibonacci and click it on the low of January 13, that daily candle and drag it up to the opening of the candle and dropping Fibonacci there. You should |
| 11 | 00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:25,050 | arrive at a price of 3,982.50398 2.50. Okay, I would favor that level as something to watch going into tonight and into tomorrow. Good evening, folks. |
| 12 | 00:02:25,860 --> 00:02:46,050 | Welcome back. Hope everybody's doing well. Alright, so it is Wednesday, January 18. And time is 8:50pm. Eastern Standard Time. I'm going to play a little |
| 13 | 00:02:46,080 --> 00:03:02,250 | portion of last night's Twitter space I hosted. And I'm going to take you into the segments where you're going to hear me outline beforehand. What you see in |
| 14 | 00:03:02,250 --> 00:03:14,130 | your chart and what I'm showing on the screen right now I want to preface it by saying that you can see a lot of support by my students across all venues and |
| 15 | 00:03:14,700 --> 00:03:25,230 | social media platforms, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, I have a lot of students all around the world. And I'm very honored to be the mentor to all of them. But |
| 16 | 00:03:25,230 --> 00:03:35,640 | sometimes you also see folks that are not all that friendly towards me. And while that doesn't bother me so much, it's important for you to understand the |
| 17 | 00:03:35,640 --> 00:03:44,790 | distinctions between me and anyone else out there that would either say something that would divert your attention from trying to learn what it is I'm |
| 18 | 00:03:44,790 --> 00:04:01,710 | teaching or cause the doubt of my efficacy as an analyst and or mentor, and the concepts that were authored by me. No one has my Enigma algorithm, no one has |
| 19 | 00:04:01,710 --> 00:04:12,300 | cracked it, no one will. And I will not teach it anyone. So unless you can see someone outline the market and call things like I'm showing you this year. And |
| 20 | 00:04:12,300 --> 00:04:21,180 | what you're about to hear and what you saw today in the charts. I want to preface it by saying also that while at the time when I was doing the recording, |
| 21 | 00:04:21,660 --> 00:04:32,280 | and live session last night, around seven o'clock, I started at like 7:20pm Eastern Time on the east coast of the United States. So I reside presently in |
| 22 | 00:04:32,670 --> 00:04:48,120 | Maryland. So I'm in New York little time. So it was I guess it was maybe an hour and a half or so in duration there abouts. It was under two hours. And I covered |
| 23 | 00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:58,170 | a lot of things I think that are beneficial for you to listen to. And I don't host them anywhere else. I know I have a lot of students that record them and |
| 24 | 00:04:58,170 --> 00:05:06,510 | download them and so on. post them on your YouTube channel. And I'm okay with that. I don't care so much about doing that. But you'll see there's other |
| 25 | 00:05:06,510 --> 00:05:20,010 | records of what I posted. And many people actually listened to that presentation last night before Wednesday's trading even began. I had been taking the comments |
| 26 | 00:05:20,010 --> 00:05:33,300 | section off the videos, because it's too much of a glad handing new sugar fest. You know, I love you ICT, that type of stuff. And while I appreciate it, okay, |
| 27 | 00:05:33,300 --> 00:05:46,500 | I'm not trying to say I don't enjoy seeing that and the encouragement that you guys give me as feedback. I don't believe that it is helpful for the general |
| 28 | 00:05:46,500 --> 00:05:54,240 | public to see that because I can still see your comments, the section of the videos where the comments are, it looks like there's no one making a comment |
| 29 | 00:05:54,270 --> 00:06:07,080 | there are, I can read all your comments, but they're private for me. And to allow that looks like I'm allowing worship and praise and glorification. And I |
| 30 | 00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:17,670 | don't want that. So I'm opening the video comment section on this video specifically, because I want the viewers that are going to watch this video |
| 31 | 00:06:17,700 --> 00:06:27,450 | months, years down the line. To see there were folks that were really here. Okay, and I would appreciate if you just take a little bit of time, and type out |
| 32 | 00:06:27,450 --> 00:06:35,430 | something that's short and sweet, because you can buy comments. Okay, a lot of trolls, a lot of people that are competing against me, are paying for comments |
| 33 | 00:06:35,460 --> 00:06:45,510 | that make it look like they're supporting their channel. And many of you, obviously, you can see this very diverse comments in my comment sections on my |
| 34 | 00:06:45,510 --> 00:06:56,910 | video. Most li all praise and thanksgiving. I don't want to see that. Okay, like I don't want to see you say on the goat on the greatest of all time, on the best |
| 35 | 00:06:56,910 --> 00:07:08,910 | on the king. I don't like those kind of comments. What I'm specifically asking you to leave a comment for is if you listen to me, before Wednesday's trading |
| 36 | 00:07:08,910 --> 00:07:21,330 | took place in my Twitter space. Okay, if you heard that, and it was understood before you saw the chart deliver as it is right now showing you in this |
| 37 | 00:07:21,330 --> 00:07:32,280 | presentation here. Please just take comments, you guys watch my videos for free, I do this for free. I'm asking a very small favor for you to just say, hey, |
| 38 | 00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:42,240 | look, you know, I was there, I listened to it. And it panned out like you said, Okay, now, before I go any further, let me remind you at the time of that |
| 39 | 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:54,240 | presentation on Twitter last night, I was trying to communicate that I don't before I go to sleep, I don't have a clear cut scenario for the morning session. |
| 40 | 00:07:54,690 --> 00:08:05,250 | Usually I can see it. And I know what I'm going to try to do. And wait until knew what midnight into London does not usually check that in the morning when I |
| 41 | 00:08:05,250 --> 00:08:18,240 | wake up, because I don't stay up in trade London anymore. So I try to sleep to keep in schedule in sync with my wife and my children. I make it very clear in |
| 42 | 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:31,140 | that Twitter space, if you listen to the whole thing, when there are times when I don't have a clear cut, directional bias a narrative to trade in. And to have |
| 43 | 00:08:31,140 --> 00:08:43,050 | a specific setup that I have to admit to you as the mentor, I'm waiting for more information. And in that Twitter space, and I've done it in other places, too. I |
| 44 | 00:08:43,050 --> 00:08:56,580 | criticize the majority of Twitter analyst, traders, quote unquote, that will give you the squiggly line that if it goes up, it'll do this. If it goes down, |
| 45 | 00:08:56,580 --> 00:09:09,120 | it'll do that. And while I admit, there are times when even in my own analysis, I am caught between where the next setup is right now going into the next |
| 46 | 00:09:09,120 --> 00:09:20,400 | trading session. So I have to require more information. Because if the narrative or setup doesn't appear in the chart, while I'm sitting down talking to you, I |
| 47 | 00:09:20,400 --> 00:09:32,670 | have nothing I can say this is what I'm going to key off of, which is what my Twitter account is for. My Twitter is for you to be in contact with me. Or more |
| 48 | 00:09:32,670 --> 00:09:44,760 | specifically, me in contact with you while the market hours are taking place. So during the morning session, I'm usually very busy then. And in the pm session in |
| 49 | 00:09:44,760 --> 00:09:54,270 | the afternoon. I'll usually send something so if I'm thinking the markets gonna go to a particular price level, or I'm critical about a specific thing that I'm |
| 50 | 00:09:54,270 --> 00:09:59,580 | seeing in the market. I'll tweet it, I'll send the chart I'll specifically refer to a level |
| 51 | 00:10:01,890 --> 00:10:11,640 | drawing your attention to it. So that way you can use that prompt by me to start watching what price does and see how the things I talk about that create |
| 52 | 00:10:11,640 --> 00:10:22,860 | patterns or entry techniques, how they materialize in your chart real time, while trusting my opinion. In that tape reading exercise, you're not trying to |
| 53 | 00:10:22,860 --> 00:10:37,950 | take a trade. But you're trying to watch price, with my experience 30 years of knowing, in my own approach, using my own analysis concepts and lending that to |
| 54 | 00:10:37,950 --> 00:10:48,810 | you. So numbers, while it's not a signal service, I am, in those instances, putting your attention on things I'm watching in my own charts at the same time, |
| 55 | 00:10:48,930 --> 00:10:57,150 | I'm not going to give you a stoploss I'm not gonna give you entry technique, or buy here, sell here, but I'm going to tell you where I believe the markets gonna |
| 56 | 00:10:57,150 --> 00:11:05,190 | reach for stuff, I'm tweeting a specific level. And if it's above the market price at the time of the tweet, that means I'm presently bullish looking for a |
| 57 | 00:11:05,190 --> 00:11:12,480 | reason for it to go up, it does not necessarily mean that it's going to go up from that moment. So you have to look for things like a fair value gap, optimal |
| 58 | 00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:22,080 | trade entry, bullish order block, something to that effect, that would lend an entry. And the reason why I don't do those types of things. Number one, I have |
| 59 | 00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:33,630 | students that are running signal services, and I would be in coaching on their business. So you wouldn't be able to find an interest in someone else, if I'm |
| 60 | 00:11:33,630 --> 00:11:41,160 | getting out here, and I'm giving you signals. So and I don't spoon feed like that. I want you to see the chart yourself. And you'll see the pattern that |
| 61 | 00:11:41,340 --> 00:11:52,260 | gravitates to you most easily. While watching live price action, there's no better way for you to find your own unique model, by looking at price with the |
| 62 | 00:11:52,620 --> 00:12:02,310 | expectation of someone that's seasoned as an analyst lend my perspective on what I think that markets going to do, and you watch it on the safety of the |
| 63 | 00:12:02,310 --> 00:12:13,380 | sidelines. And that's tape reading. And you do that for months. And it builds an understanding about how to read price. And every educator, every trading |
| 64 | 00:12:13,410 --> 00:12:24,720 | methodology, every style or approach of learning trading, I've never seen the emphasis placed on that, to the degree that is required. And that's why I tell |
| 65 | 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:34,380 | folks the minimum six months and preferably a full calendar year, which is what I'm doing with 2023 mentorship, live sessions over a chart will begin February |
| 66 | 00:12:34,380 --> 00:12:45,600 | 7, but I'm giving commentary and prompts on Twitter before that I've been doing all year. So there's a lot of things I'm not going to talk about in this |
| 67 | 00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:54,810 | presentation, because you can go over to my Twitter and see the tweets. Okay, there's short little videos, you can see some executions today and how it went |
| 68 | 00:12:54,810 --> 00:13:06,960 | to other levels. I called and I'll leave that for your enjoyment and discovery. But going forward. Okay, you actually heard me talk about the very specifics of |
| 69 | 00:13:06,960 --> 00:13:16,380 | what you're seeing here in the chart. I mentioned how in that Twitter space, that this level here, and I mentioned in my weekend commentary before the week |
| 70 | 00:13:16,380 --> 00:13:30,120 | actually started. So the video I put up on the YouTube channel, that commentary mentions this particular closing price that the price is 40 30.75. So you can |
| 71 | 00:13:30,120 --> 00:13:40,350 | see we had difficulty there on Wednesdays trading and on Tuesdays trading. And it was unable to get through that. And I called this specific level in advance |
| 72 | 00:13:40,350 --> 00:13:53,970 | the watch that. And because of where it was the long wick here and all these wicks in here. We were in a period, that seven o'clock last night at least. We |
| 73 | 00:13:53,970 --> 00:14:05,970 | were at a point where I did not have any confidence to side on one narrative or bias for the marketplace going into morning session, or even London. So if I |
| 74 | 00:14:05,970 --> 00:14:18,660 | don't have an opinion of what I think it's going to do for London or going into am session for stock in this, then I had to come to conclusion that I'm neutral. |
| 75 | 00:14:18,720 --> 00:14:28,140 | So a neutral bias is I have to wait for more information. And what information is that I'm going to allow the 930 open or the opening bell at 930 in New York |
| 76 | 00:14:28,140 --> 00:14:43,830 | time to give me that indication of what it wants to do. So you can see middle of this wick here. That is 39 82.50. You hear me mentioned that at the beginning |
| 77 | 00:14:43,830 --> 00:14:52,380 | the video in last night's Twitter space. This one here is essentially the same thing that's been shown or outline for this wick. You're getting the middle of |
| 78 | 00:14:52,380 --> 00:15:00,750 | that wick measured here. So that's also a level you'll see when we go into lower timeframes. And this is the fair value gap. I mentioned it to be Beginning of |
| 79 | 00:15:00,750 --> 00:15:15,450 | the Twitter space portion I was shown, or letting you listen to rally this candles high on the 10th of January is the exact to the tick low of Wednesday's |
| 80 | 00:15:15,450 --> 00:15:28,710 | trading. Now, this is the thing, okay, this is the thing that everybody knows me for, in forex, to the tick. Okay, I'm sorry, to the PIP rather, in futures, but |
| 81 | 00:15:28,710 --> 00:15:41,880 | I'm also to the pip in forex, and that's why my analogies with being a sniper, Sniper trading kind of like popularized that with Forex, and shown executions |
| 82 | 00:15:41,880 --> 00:15:48,990 | and shown techniques and concepts that would deliver that. And a lot of my students all around the world are using those things, okay. WaterBlock, Smart |
| 83 | 00:15:48,990 --> 00:16:00,060 | Money concepts, the whole whole business, the precision, that's in futures, and in bond trading near 30 year bonds, that it cannot be beaten, in terms of |
| 84 | 00:16:00,060 --> 00:16:12,360 | precision, because it's to the tick. Most times, whereas Forex sometimes that can be off two to three pips, because of the broker spread. Okay. And that's one |
| 85 | 00:16:12,360 --> 00:16:21,240 | of the things that was always a frustration for me while trading Forex is because I don't get the laser precision that I can, you can see clearly in my |
| 86 | 00:16:21,240 --> 00:16:31,740 | examples this year, I'm showing you next level technology in terms of analysis, stop loss management stops being one tick away, in trusting the fact that he |
| 87 | 00:16:31,740 --> 00:16:43,740 | won't go there, you cannot pull that off. In Forex, and I don't care, anyone can claim they can, they will not be able to demonstrate that consistently, because |
| 88 | 00:16:43,980 --> 00:16:52,830 | if they're in a live account, the demo won't open to grab their order. Because it's, it doesn't care, it doesn't see an internal pool of liquidity that Most |
| 89 | 00:16:52,860 --> 00:17:01,320 | brokers are working through, you're trading through their pool of liquidity. Because most times those brokers are actually trading against you. And because |
| 90 | 00:17:01,320 --> 00:17:12,930 | of that, your tight stop loss, they can open the spread, snatch your order, and you're going. You don't have that so much in futures, because everybody has the |
| 91 | 00:17:12,930 --> 00:17:23,550 | same price. That's why I can be confident when I have my stocks where I have them. And I'm not worried about it getting close to my stock, because if it's |
| 92 | 00:17:23,550 --> 00:17:32,280 | going to go to my stop, and stop me, I'm wrong. And I'm okay with that. But I know if I'm on one side, that means I'm correct about what I'm expecting to see |
| 93 | 00:17:32,280 --> 00:17:47,130 | in price. The arrays that I'm teaching you the algorithm will respect, my orders will be behind that. And you've seen dozens of examples of that. It's an kamy, |
| 94 | 00:17:47,190 --> 00:17:59,970 | how it just perfectly operates. As one would expect if you want laser precision, in terms of stock placement and trade targets, entries, all those things are |
| 95 | 00:17:59,970 --> 00:18:16,980 | communicating authorship. It's communicating ownership. Nobody has enigma. But me. No one can do what I'm doing with this information, but me. So I'm showing |
| 96 | 00:18:16,980 --> 00:18:25,620 | you this year, everybody out there that has been listening to what I'm teaching, or they're not liking the fact that the trading community is warming up to the |
| 97 | 00:18:25,620 --> 00:18:36,660 | ideas of the things I'm teaching you and sharing for free wanting you to be successful with. The competitive side of this business, like anything else, is |
| 98 | 00:18:36,660 --> 00:18:43,800 | shady. And they're gonna say things make up things and claim that they can do something too. They won't ever be able to do what you just seen me do today. |
| 99 | 00:18:44,760 --> 00:18:52,830 | They're not going to be able to because if they knew what I know, if they knew Enigma, if they knew my algorithm, they will be able to take parts of it, like I |
| 100 | 00:18:52,830 --> 00:19:03,960 | did last night and explain what I'd be waiting for. And how it was gonna go to where it was gonna go. And you can't be perfect. This candles. Hi. I talk about |
| 101 | 00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:17,760 | that. In last night's Twitter space. I have students that recorded themselves listening to it over a chart and they posted exactly what I was saying, in the |
| 102 | 00:19:17,760 --> 00:19:28,950 | Twitter space on a chart on our YouTube channel. So it's transferable. It's not something that's cherry picked. It's not hindsight. It's absolutely on a daily |
| 103 | 00:19:28,950 --> 00:19:41,460 | timeframe. So I'm teaching you that precision still exists on all timeframes. The algorithm is not limited to intraday charts. It's not limited to anything. |
| 104 | 00:19:42,480 --> 00:19:47,160 | It's the same price. It has to operate differently |
| 105 | 00:19:48,779 --> 00:19:58,349 | on different timeframes. And you'll have to submit to obviously longer durations for setups to pan out when you're looking at daily four hour and hourly charts |
| 106 | 00:19:59,579 --> 00:20:12,269 | but I've never shy away from willing to be able to engage these markets. If you can't be on an intraday basis. Well, here's your evidence that it works on just |
| 107 | 00:20:12,269 --> 00:20:24,059 | daily charts. You can see it forming, you can take setups on a daily chart, and just let it pan out. It will take you time for those positions to come to their |
| 108 | 00:20:24,059 --> 00:20:35,819 | targets. But if you're forced to do something outside of intraday charts, you, you already know you're waiting new for its longer durations. So this candles, |
| 109 | 00:20:35,819 --> 00:20:47,429 | hi, that was the very low of Wednesday's trading to the tick, you didn't go one tick lower didn't come short of it by one tick. It was directly 100%. Right on |
| 110 | 00:20:48,329 --> 00:21:01,259 | perfectly. And I want you to check your chart too. So look at January 10. Compare that candles high to the low on Wednesday, January 18 2023. That's |
| 111 | 00:21:01,259 --> 00:21:11,159 | perfect, folks. There's no room for improvement. There's no gray area where well it was it was closed but didn't get there. I don't play horseshoes, and neither |
| 112 | 00:21:11,159 --> 00:21:25,409 | does the algorithm. So we're nailing it. And that's a testimony to authorship. That's a testimonial, who knows what, who owns a Nygma. Who, who engineered it. |
| 113 | 00:21:26,670 --> 00:21:31,080 | Who wrote it? Who coded it, who's proving it. |
| 114 | 00:21:33,000 --> 00:21:43,110 | I'm not out there calling things incorrectly. I'm giving you the daily range, I'm telling you where the algorithm is going to have periods of consolidation |
| 115 | 00:21:43,110 --> 00:21:51,810 | where it can get erratic. Then once things get in alignment, then I'll tell you, where I think the market is gonna go based on the ideas that the algorithm will |
| 116 | 00:21:51,810 --> 00:22:02,220 | deliver. And let my tweets be the testimony of that every single day, I'm calling it every single day and my students are seeing it. They're growing in |
| 117 | 00:22:02,220 --> 00:22:16,320 | their understanding. And they're not getting signals spoon fed to them. That's important. Because if you're looking for signals, entry technique stops and put |
| 118 | 00:22:16,320 --> 00:22:27,480 | me in a trade, I'm not going to be helpful to you in that regard. And I don't have an issue with being hated because of that, or being criticized because I |
| 119 | 00:22:27,480 --> 00:22:37,980 | don't put you into a trade, I'm not going to be guilted into it. I'm being as as responsible as I can. And also respect my students who trained under me, and now |
| 120 | 00:22:37,980 --> 00:22:46,590 | we're running signal services. So I don't want to encroach upon them because I would be taking their clientele if I went in here and started doing signals. And |
| 121 | 00:22:46,590 --> 00:23:01,530 | frankly, I don't want that. I don't want that responsibility. I don't want the headache. So we also had this candles low, which is 3961. And I think three |
| 122 | 00:23:01,530 --> 00:23:09,990 | quarters, something of that effect. But you'll see it also we in the lower timeframes. So that was the dynamic with everything explained in the Twitter |
| 123 | 00:23:09,990 --> 00:23:22,350 | space last night. And because at the time at 7:20pm. I mentioned that I don't have a clear cut bias because I have to wait until the morning session to either |
| 124 | 00:23:22,350 --> 00:23:29,850 | wait and see what we would see in the delivery of price because anything happened overnight while I'm sleeping. Anything could happen, you know at 830 |
| 125 | 00:23:30,150 --> 00:23:44,580 | before 930. And I'm submitting myself to the process of waiting for the opening bell at 930. Here's the hourly chart. And that same fair value gap on the daily |
| 126 | 00:23:44,580 --> 00:23:55,350 | chart is being shown here. And the fair value gap is the PD array in the classification for the fair value gap is a busy meaning by sight and balance |
| 127 | 00:23:55,350 --> 00:24:03,330 | outside inefficiency. So it was delivered on the daily chart with an up candle. And it would be expected to see the algorithm deliver to the downside with |
| 128 | 00:24:03,630 --> 00:24:17,040 | sellside. Okay, so you can see that the low is nailing that fair value gap well, right to the tick and we'll get closer when we go into smaller timeframes. This |
| 129 | 00:24:17,040 --> 00:24:30,570 | morning, I was counseling everyone on Twitter to be mindful that it is very, very choppy. And the highs were suspect. So even though I liked the 40 30.75 |
| 130 | 00:24:30,570 --> 00:24:41,400 | level and we've been talking about it since last week, it was one of my targets for upside last week 4020 was in 4030 And if it could reach 4030 Maybe trade up |
| 131 | 00:24:41,400 --> 00:24:50,310 | into the 4040 level and I was given room for that potentially happening today. What I wanted to see in this way have gotten me in alignment immediately with |
| 132 | 00:24:50,310 --> 00:24:59,160 | going short. Based on the analysis I gave last night at 720 because I was not able to give you a clear cut. This is what it's going to reach for there was no |
| 133 | 00:24:59,160 --> 00:25:14,430 | fair value got three short because we were bumping up against that 40 30.75 on the daily chart. So that upper boundary on a daily chart in the form of premium |
| 134 | 00:25:15,420 --> 00:25:32,490 | didn't lend well to go beyond that much for a higher fair value get. So I would be looking for short term, buy stop hunts over this high here, that was 4035, |
| 135 | 00:25:32,490 --> 00:25:42,390 | essentially. So I was watching 4036. I was mentioning it today in tweets. And I said it could potentially drive up into 4040. I mentioned that last week, and it |
| 136 | 00:25:42,390 --> 00:25:53,100 | was still on my notes as a potential run above this short term high. Now, if it were to do that, I would have been looking for that to fail. And as a turtle |
| 137 | 00:25:53,100 --> 00:26:04,050 | suit, fake breakout, and go short, sell it and look for 3982 and a half. That's what I was trying to do. I was waiting for that to happen this morning. And I |
| 138 | 00:26:04,050 --> 00:26:15,690 | did two trades, where I was going in long. And I was able to get a partial off until Beisa liquidity pool, which I'll talk about when we get into lower |
| 139 | 00:26:15,690 --> 00:26:26,430 | timeframes, but it ended up failing, thinking back on my stop and took me on breakeven on the balance. So it wasn't that big of a deal. But I was proving |
| 140 | 00:26:26,430 --> 00:26:36,990 | that, you know, when you're in that environment in between real setups that I would rather take smaller timeframe moves, I can still find those five handles |
| 141 | 00:26:36,990 --> 00:26:51,960 | and approve that this morning. The point of reaching down to that 3982 and a half level, which is this one here. Don't be confused with this here. This line |
| 142 | 00:26:51,960 --> 00:27:02,310 | is being anchored to the daily chart, the midpoint of that wick, just like this line is being anchored to the previous day. The middle, it's wick. So when you |
| 143 | 00:27:02,310 --> 00:27:10,350 | do the higher timeframe levels, and you transpose those same levels into your lower timeframe, this being an hourly chart, the lines might look a little |
| 144 | 00:27:10,350 --> 00:27:18,120 | differently than they did when you anchored on the higher timeframe. It's not that important. You just got to be mindful where those levels are because that's |
| 145 | 00:27:18,120 --> 00:27:30,360 | exactly what the algorithm is going to refer to. The market doesn't drop, okay. The market doesn't drop because there's a lot of sellers coming in here. The |
| 146 | 00:27:30,360 --> 00:27:39,390 | market doesn't drop because it's ran out of buyers either. I know folks that are making money, they they got a friend, it used to be on the floor trading, they |
| 147 | 00:27:39,390 --> 00:27:47,730 | got a buddy that runs a desk at a brokerage firm, okay, or maybe a large institution. And they call that a market maker when they're not their dealer. |
| 148 | 00:27:48,390 --> 00:28:01,230 | You'll hear folks talk and say that buying and selling pressure were the catalysts for moves in the marketplace. And that is a misinformation. The |
| 149 | 00:28:01,230 --> 00:28:14,790 | markets are absolutely controlled. The algorithms that run price, we are told that high frequency traders are muscling the market they're not. They're just |
| 150 | 00:28:14,790 --> 00:28:24,090 | going in and taking small little pieces like a like a pack of Parana or a school of Parana. And say it that way. Where they go in they take these small bites, |
| 151 | 00:28:24,090 --> 00:28:37,590 | but because there's a lot of them working constantly, they devour the liquidity that's being offered in the marketplace. So that buying and selling pressure |
| 152 | 00:28:37,590 --> 00:28:53,220 | that they do is not the be all end all for the rhyme and reason why price goes up and down. The market is going to go where the markets going to go regardless |
| 153 | 00:28:53,220 --> 00:29:04,920 | of how much volume is coming in. How much volume does it take for the s&p to move 10 handles? How much volume does it take for the s&p to move five handles? |
| 154 | 00:29:06,240 --> 00:29:18,870 | How much volume does it take for the s&p to move 100 handles? How much volume does it take to have the gap opening that we see from when the market closes at |
| 155 | 00:29:18,870 --> 00:29:30,660 | 5pm Eastern time. And we're open to 6pm Sometimes it can gap 20 handles, how much volume did it take to do that? Whatever the first print trade was, see when |
| 156 | 00:29:30,660 --> 00:29:40,110 | you when you take a step back and look at things like it really is you stop listening to the nonsense and the misinformation. And then you can really get to |
| 157 | 00:29:40,110 --> 00:29:51,450 | the core reasons as to what's going on. It's all manipulated, it's all controlled. So you have to wait for certain things to appear and occur in price |
| 158 | 00:29:51,450 --> 00:30:01,590 | action. And unless you know what they are and those things are what I'm teaching you for free. I'm proving them daily. I'm showing precision In entries, partial |
| 159 | 00:30:01,590 --> 00:30:09,210 | exits and targets being hit, stop placement and management. I'm calling the levels and device beforehand, I'm explaining when the market is going to be |
| 160 | 00:30:09,210 --> 00:30:23,880 | choppy and sloppy until it does certain things that my friends and neighbors is proof of authorship. That's a man that's had his hands on this. And you can't |
| 161 | 00:30:23,910 --> 00:30:36,900 | argue against that when it's shown to you like this. So when I talk to you this way, I'm not trying to be a braggart. I'm not trying to be egotistical. I'm not |
| 162 | 00:30:36,900 --> 00:30:48,060 | trying to be arrogant. I'm speaking from a position of authority, I know what I'm teaching you. You don't know what I'm teaching you, you have no idea where |
| 163 | 00:30:48,060 --> 00:31:02,490 | I'm taking you in the lessons. And many of you are just simply overzealous, and you want to sound and in be, like, I show in my examples. I don't count candles, |
| 164 | 00:31:03,870 --> 00:31:13,170 | there's no counting to a specific number of candles. And that's the secret recipe for Nygma. That's not a nigga has no reference at all in the chart. So as |
| 165 | 00:31:13,170 --> 00:31:20,640 | soon as someone talks to you about how they have Enigma, and they're going to sell you a Nygma, or they're going to give you a free access to Enigma, or they |
| 166 | 00:31:20,640 --> 00:31:30,360 | can trade and do signals and give you new trades based on Enigma, they have nothing. They have nothing, because my algorithm has absolutely nothing to do |
| 167 | 00:31:30,360 --> 00:31:30,900 | with a chart. |
| 168 | 00:31:33,089 --> 00:31:52,079 | It's all time in price and macros, things that you won't even see in your chart. Until after it happens. It's before your chart prints. Sorry. The fact that I |
| 169 | 00:31:52,079 --> 00:32:03,929 | outlined what I outlined last night. I said, these folks on social media, they'll say, I hope you understand I'm I know there's a small segment of my |
| 170 | 00:32:03,929 --> 00:32:10,589 | audience that doesn't like me saying these types of things because they get their head, their feelings hurt, because they're usually the Instagramers or the |
| 171 | 00:32:10,949 --> 00:32:20,729 | Twitter guys or something to that effect, where they're trying to run telegram signal rooms, and they're pretending to be technical heroes. Okay, you titans of |
| 172 | 00:32:20,759 --> 00:32:30,449 | technical analysis. And they don't like when I talk like this, because it sounds like you know, I'm talking about them specifically when I'm talking about all of |
| 173 | 00:32:30,449 --> 00:32:44,249 | them. So when I see folks that are drawing their lines for a bullish scenario, if it goes up or a bearish scenario when it goes down, as I was mentioning last |
| 174 | 00:32:44,249 --> 00:32:54,149 | night in the Twitter space, usually see it on Twitter, these folks that have a large following, but they're not ever telling you what they're going to see in |
| 175 | 00:32:54,149 --> 00:33:02,699 | the marketplace. It's the both sides of the coin type thing and flip it and see what happens and either side lands on right look at this haha. And the scenarios |
| 176 | 00:33:02,699 --> 00:33:12,899 | that even scribble and draw out aren't necessarily exactly what happens in the marketplace. But because a lay audience neophytes know people that don't really |
| 177 | 00:33:12,899 --> 00:33:22,889 | know what's going on, they see, oh, it's higher than wherever he said it was there. And they ignore that that person that pretend trader, new teacher mentor, |
| 178 | 00:33:24,029 --> 00:33:35,249 | said both sides. The difference between me is 90% of time, if I'm talking, number one, I know what I'm talking about. Because I got a lot to say about it, |
| 179 | 00:33:35,309 --> 00:33:41,879 | too. I prove it, I walked with it, I show the receipts, I call it beforehand, I execute on it, my students are actually doing it without me telling them how to |
| 180 | 00:33:41,879 --> 00:33:51,269 | trade it. They're recording it, executing it, and putting on their YouTube channel and on Twitter. So it's transferable. But there are times like last |
| 181 | 00:33:51,269 --> 00:33:58,529 | night I was emitting, like I've done many times over the years as a mentor. There are times where I'm personally waiting for more information. And there's |
| 182 | 00:33:58,529 --> 00:34:08,999 | nothing wrong with that. I need to see what it wants to do. Because once it shows its hand to me, then manual intervention that can take place that I can't |
| 183 | 00:34:09,119 --> 00:34:21,689 | always foresee happening. When that takes place, or when the algorithm gives me the signatures that I know it will follow. Then I'm confident I'll go out and |
| 184 | 00:34:21,689 --> 00:34:31,709 | say, Okay, we're looking for this. But if I'm saying look, you know, right now we're in a period that requires more information on neutral, that means I'm |
| 185 | 00:34:31,709 --> 00:34:43,679 | waiting for the algorithm to do specific things to show me what it wants to do. And then I get in alignment with that. I love looking for traders that have |
| 186 | 00:34:43,829 --> 00:34:51,899 | strong opinions on social media or on YouTube Live sessions and their streaming. Or if I see them executing on a trade when I know the algorithm is doing |
| 187 | 00:34:51,899 --> 00:35:03,269 | something else. I love that tug of war because the I'm gonna go in here with my maximum risk then because I'm We're entering at a time when smart money is |
| 188 | 00:35:03,269 --> 00:35:14,639 | armwrestling retail Street money, and who do you think is going to win that competition? Clearly, the neophyte retail trader is going to lose. So I like to |
| 189 | 00:35:14,639 --> 00:35:22,049 | look for that. And that's why I like watching certain live streamers. Not all of them are bad traders, I just like listening to them, when they're collectively |
| 190 | 00:35:22,319 --> 00:35:30,059 | referring to something that's in alignment, they think it's gonna go higher, or they think it's gonna go lower. And many times when they think it's not gonna go |
| 191 | 00:35:30,059 --> 00:35:42,029 | anywhere, I'm in near trading it, and it's a good move. So I'm always trying to find those periods where there's a diametrically opposed position held by the |
| 192 | 00:35:42,029 --> 00:35:55,619 | retail community, and then that of what I see and understand about my algorithm. So while I do have periods of in decisiveness, and I'm waiting for more |
| 193 | 00:35:55,619 --> 00:36:05,219 | information, I always my students will vouch for this. And, folks, if you're a charter member in my private group, which none of you can be, I'm not inviting |
| 194 | 00:36:05,249 --> 00:36:13,859 | you request, because I'm not letting anyone do this anymore. This is where I'm teaching now. But my private group students will tell you that in my mentorship, |
| 195 | 00:36:13,889 --> 00:36:26,009 | when I was doing daily analysis for them, I would ask them to understand that while I'm waiting for more information, if a gun was held in my head, and they |
| 196 | 00:36:26,009 --> 00:36:34,799 | said, ICT, you have to tell us what you think is going to happen right now. Even if you think it's 5050, what do you think's gonna happen. So I always use the |
| 197 | 00:36:34,799 --> 00:36:45,209 | analogy gun to my head, this is what I think last night at 720. That's what I was saying. Because of the fact that 40 30.75, we're at that premium range on |
| 198 | 00:36:45,209 --> 00:36:55,499 | the daily chart. Because of that, and because we've already tried going higher several times. And we only have one real run on sellside. Recently, it's more |
| 199 | 00:36:55,499 --> 00:37:05,489 | likely for it to do what you see here. But I wanted to wait and see the morning 930 opening, I wanted to see if it would want to run up and take out that |
| 200 | 00:37:05,639 --> 00:37:16,409 | Tuesday, hi, run out to 4036 and maybe even spike up in the 4040, which was a level I had an interest in last week. So I was submitting myself to the |
| 201 | 00:37:16,409 --> 00:37:26,579 | likelihood that we would chop around until we spike up into Tuesday's high or ended at 4040 level, then I would have been looking for that as a potential to |
| 202 | 00:37:26,579 --> 00:37:37,829 | sell short. Probably use that right in there to go short. And then add more as it made more fair value gaps and new bearish breakers and bearish institutional |
| 203 | 00:37:37,829 --> 00:37:46,769 | order flow entry drills and all the things I look for to go short on. But because it did not deliver that, and it was staying in a range, I just worked |
| 204 | 00:37:46,769 --> 00:37:58,229 | inside that smaller range. And then obviously, you know, when I seen what I was expecting to see, and we'll look at that now going into lower timeframe. We |
| 205 | 00:37:58,229 --> 00:38:07,829 | started seeing a lot of the back and forth choppiness here, okay. And you might look at this hindsight now, like some of my students actually did after the |
| 206 | 00:38:07,829 --> 00:38:17,099 | market started break down. Their question was, you know, why didn't you see this happening? And why do you didn't see that, number one, the risk level was |
| 207 | 00:38:17,099 --> 00:38:28,229 | elevated this morning. The uncertainty is high. And I did not want to commit or cosign anything on the short side. And too, I knew I had a lot of things on my |
| 208 | 00:38:28,229 --> 00:38:36,419 | side that justify it. So here's the opening price at midnight here in New York local time. So ideally, if you're trying to trade the daily range, if you're |
| 209 | 00:38:36,419 --> 00:38:45,479 | trying to get in there, and trade, like my algorithm would seek to trade it, which is, if I'm going to be bearish and selling short, I want to be entering |
| 210 | 00:38:45,479 --> 00:38:55,529 | short above the opening price at midnight. Preferably, that's what I'm looking for. Because I'm entering it in an area where smart money is accumulating the |
| 211 | 00:38:55,529 --> 00:39:06,839 | largest portion of their short position for the daily range. I can also utilize the 830. opening price, and I can use the 930 opening price. So there's three |
| 212 | 00:39:06,839 --> 00:39:19,739 | opening prices that I like to use within the 24 hour trading period. All three of them can be utilized uniquely and independent of themselves. But the largest |
| 213 | 00:39:19,739 --> 00:39:32,279 | portion of the day, can many times form overnight in London, unless we are in consolidations like we have here where we can see from yesterday morning, we |
| 214 | 00:39:32,279 --> 00:39:43,889 | have just been chopping around in his big range. And I wanted to see them take out Tuesday's high, we got close to it, but couldn't spike it up in there. So I |
| 215 | 00:39:43,889 --> 00:39:53,999 | was looking for that potential scenario to do that because I was really going to try to nail down the high within a half a point. That's why I was purposely |
| 216 | 00:39:53,999 --> 00:40:02,009 | going in there trying to do that. And I was also trying to go long, catching the small points going up And then I was gonna reverse. That's what I was trying to |
| 217 | 00:40:02,009 --> 00:40:09,359 | do. So I wanted to show you that I could do those types of things. And I would have been here talking about how, you know, this is what I was aiming to do. And |
| 218 | 00:40:09,359 --> 00:40:20,039 | this is why I did it. So because I didn't have that opportunity to see a run above 4036, or even spike in the 4040, I had to wait for more information on the |
| 219 | 00:40:20,039 --> 00:40:34,019 | sell side of things, because we didn't get that spike above Tuesday's high. So you can see how we drifted down into 3982 and a half, and 3973, even, which is |
| 220 | 00:40:34,019 --> 00:40:45,479 | the daily candle that has both those wicks on low end of the candle, split those wicks in half, measure them 50%, you'll get this level in this level, okay? |
| 221 | 00:40:48,419 --> 00:41:02,309 | dropping into a five minute chart. Here's a 930 opening bell, we wait for that. And we had a lot of choppiness in here, back and forth. And I'm looking for |
| 222 | 00:41:03,059 --> 00:41:16,349 | Tuesday's high to be taken out. And we had this bicep liquidity pool form here. And then it finally punch through it. Create this short term low here. But |
| 223 | 00:41:16,349 --> 00:41:24,869 | notice it didn't take out this low yet. Now, you could argue and say, What about this one here? If this is what you need that have your notes, okay, because |
| 224 | 00:41:24,869 --> 00:41:28,649 | there's a couple of people that had this question in my tweets. |
| 225 | 00:41:31,980 --> 00:41:44,820 | I wanted this one to break down. More specifically, because that was the one that ran from there, into new higher high, and took out this spike over here. So |
| 226 | 00:41:44,850 --> 00:41:53,640 | that run here, I wanted to see that when taken out. I was aware of the short term low. But I was not trying to commit to that because I felt because we were |
| 227 | 00:41:53,640 --> 00:42:04,230 | going to larger consolidation, it still might spike up in there and run 4036 because it failed to do so on this high here. So if it would have spiked above |
| 228 | 00:42:04,260 --> 00:42:14,970 | Tuesday's high, then I would have used this low here as a shift in market structure bearish. So when it did this move here, if this is what I'm talking |
| 229 | 00:42:14,970 --> 00:42:28,830 | about when things are algorithmic algorithmic theory, relies a whole lot on If this occurs, then that if this occurs, but not this, then that. So there's a lot |
| 230 | 00:42:28,830 --> 00:42:42,240 | of if then, syntax of everything has to be weighed on decisions that are binary. So there's a series of those discussions that you have to have internally while |
| 231 | 00:42:42,240 --> 00:42:55,050 | you're watching price as a trader. This low was not taken out until here. Now, I knew before this low was taken out here that I wanted to go short. And you seen |
| 232 | 00:42:55,110 --> 00:43:05,250 | a tweet, and I'll show it to you in my presentation tonight. But I did not want to take that short term low here, when it broke down here, because I felt that |
| 233 | 00:43:05,250 --> 00:43:16,350 | this could have been just one more time where it was leading people astray, like myself or anyone else that would trust that that high was formed, just on that |
| 234 | 00:43:16,350 --> 00:43:28,980 | shallow that are run with this move here. Because it did not take out Tuesday's high, previous days trading high by trading the 4036. If it would have done |
| 235 | 00:43:28,980 --> 00:43:40,230 | that, then this short term low was broken, then anything in that high at 440 36 to this low taken out that low. If there's a bit of a gap in there, I would |
| 236 | 00:43:40,230 --> 00:43:54,750 | trade that. And that will be content with that writing it down to 3982 and a half, as I outlined last night. But I did not trust this high. Now some of you |
| 237 | 00:43:54,750 --> 00:44:04,260 | might say, well, you know, that doesn't sound like the hallmark of a professional, I beg to differ. Because what I just gave you was the logic and |
| 238 | 00:44:04,260 --> 00:44:17,760 | the narrative that would require me to use that swing low. And it was not just contrived here because everyone knew in my tweets what I was looking for. I was |
| 239 | 00:44:17,760 --> 00:44:26,580 | looking for that 4036 Ron maybe spiking into 4040 Go look at my tweets, I'm not going to have all the tweets in this presentation. It's important for you to go |
| 240 | 00:44:26,580 --> 00:44:34,530 | through my tweets, this isn't gonna be that many of them. Now, if you're in your office and you're trying to hide from your boss, it's going to feel like I'm |
| 241 | 00:44:34,530 --> 00:44:42,960 | tweeting all the time, because you're afraid to get in trouble. I can't make any apologies for that, you know, I'm going to do what I got to do you just gonna |
| 242 | 00:44:42,960 --> 00:44:49,320 | have to deal with it or turn the notifications off. But if you want to be alerted to what I'm looking for next, and that's the sacrifice you're gonna pay. |
| 243 | 00:44:49,740 --> 00:44:57,870 | On a busy day. I'm going to tweet a lot. And if you're going to complain to me, just you want to unfollow because I'll just block you and do the to the favor |
| 244 | 00:44:57,870 --> 00:45:10,110 | for you. So On this run here below the short term low. In perfect hindsight, it looks great. But I can tell you the logic I was waiting on was that spike higher |
| 245 | 00:45:10,110 --> 00:45:18,120 | above Tuesday's high because we didn't get it, it is what it is. All these levels here you can see the fear of a gap there, trades up into it here. There's |
| 246 | 00:45:18,120 --> 00:45:28,620 | a bearish order block, you'll see we get to the one minute chart, that's not anything here. And it's noteworthy. And then we have fair value gap here are |
| 247 | 00:45:28,620 --> 00:45:43,140 | trades up into here, here, and we're in the lunch hour here now. So let's go into a one minute chart for the morning session. Alright, so here is that low. I |
| 248 | 00:45:43,140 --> 00:45:51,900 | mentioned on the five minute chart, if we would have spiked up the 4036 and took out Tuesday's high, then break down like it did here and took out that short |
| 249 | 00:45:51,900 --> 00:46:01,470 | term low, then I would have trusted this is a shift in market structure. Even though my minute chart we have a gap. It's there. Yes, I seen it. I was watching |
| 250 | 00:46:01,470 --> 00:46:12,720 | it in here. But because this could very easily ran up and hit that Tuesday high, then I would have to use the same protocol of using whatever swing low formed |
| 251 | 00:46:12,750 --> 00:46:22,170 | from this low up to that higher high 4036, which didn't occur but hadn't done it here. And I was making allowance for that. It wasn't until we broke below this |
| 252 | 00:46:22,170 --> 00:46:32,880 | short term low. There. And as you'll see an actually show you a tweet where I actually got prompted everybody said any other day. Yeah, I would use this as an |
| 253 | 00:46:32,880 --> 00:46:38,220 | entry to go short. And aim for the 4010 to 4008 liquidity next, |
| 254 | 00:46:38,729 --> 00:46:40,949 | which was over here. Okay. |
| 255 | 00:46:42,150 --> 00:46:51,360 | But we broke down, we had a nice little fair pay gap in here ahead of the sell side liquidity being tagged, which it does runs up fear of a gap in bearish |
| 256 | 00:46:51,360 --> 00:47:03,060 | order block, that's a close candle, it drops down now notice that this signal and this signal here forms very close in close proximity to the midnight opening |
| 257 | 00:47:03,060 --> 00:47:12,690 | price. That's it this little purple dotted line is going across the entire chart. So there is two setups that were beautiful. If you want to get in |
| 258 | 00:47:12,690 --> 00:47:23,040 | alignment with a large range day using power three concepts that I teach and it moves lower. Then we have the order block which is left up close candle prior to |
| 259 | 00:47:23,040 --> 00:47:35,880 | this displacement coupled with a fair value gap, mean threshold, trades up into it here. breaks down attack sell side below here expands lower institutional |
| 260 | 00:47:35,880 --> 00:47:47,370 | refer into jail, multiple ones here. Institutional interval entry drill is what you see, when I type on my charts and annotations. The i o f ed is short for |
| 261 | 00:47:47,400 --> 00:47:56,610 | institutional order flow entry drill, it's a high frequency trading entry technique where it just goes into and touches the candle that would create a |
| 262 | 00:47:56,610 --> 00:48:04,080 | fair value gap or imbalance or has those touch that like it does here and here in high frequency algorithms are going into the marketplace right there. |
| 263 | 00:48:05,070 --> 00:48:16,530 | Sometimes it is because at one tick but that's that's usually what they're using the entry there. Okay, and you can thank me for that one. A lot of a lot of |
| 264 | 00:48:16,530 --> 00:48:25,710 | firms out there using that one now. So it breaks lower side and balance by side and efficiency, which is a fair value gap. But the classifications is sippy s |
| 265 | 00:48:25,710 --> 00:48:38,670 | IBI runs up, reprice it till here, leaves it again, bounce price range there, it's not going to go back up into it again, smash interest into the lunch hour |
| 266 | 00:48:38,670 --> 00:48:50,760 | starting. Okay. I'm going to take you into the very moment on the one minute chart. And you can see how this was a mess, it was fine. This is the entry |
| 267 | 00:48:50,760 --> 00:49:00,240 | technique with the fair value gap there. This was a technique here with this fair pay gap I went in here. And when we ran above the buy side, you saw me take |
| 268 | 00:49:00,240 --> 00:49:08,940 | a partial there and it came all the way back down and stopped me on the balance. This was another one here I was working with my son rallied up and then I was |
| 269 | 00:49:08,940 --> 00:49:19,950 | looking for 4036 and then come back and stop me out when you're here. No fair of a gap in here. So even though we have short term low here, any one of these |
| 270 | 00:49:20,160 --> 00:49:33,390 | could have been mis interpreted. Not sent us this one here could have been misinterpreted today and utilized as well. This is the shift in market |
| 271 | 00:49:33,390 --> 00:49:44,490 | structure. And because there was multiple ones here, the fact that any one of these are taken out to the downside with price delivery here without the Tuesday |
| 272 | 00:49:44,490 --> 00:49:54,660 | high being taken out, which is what I was making allowance for in my expectations in the morning session. Post 930. I want to see that run up there. |
| 273 | 00:49:54,960 --> 00:50:03,120 | And I didn't want to get caught offside in the event that they were going to do another run up and clear out, because then I wouldn't have been able to put on |
| 274 | 00:50:03,120 --> 00:50:13,020 | the largest position I would like to do with that fake run to 4040 or 4036 blowout of buyside liquidity on Tuesdays Hi, I would have to use smaller |
| 275 | 00:50:13,020 --> 00:50:22,470 | leverage because I would be doing what trying to go short and then get caught wrong, they run the stops at 4036 or 4040. Me be stopped out, then I had |
| 276 | 00:50:22,470 --> 00:50:33,840 | drawdown on the day, then I can't use my max leverage on my trade, which is usually six contracts going in, building up to 10. So because of this shift |
| 277 | 00:50:33,840 --> 00:50:42,960 | here, and then returning back up into it, me thinking I was going to likely go up to Tuesday's high, I did not trust any of this until we had that short term |
| 278 | 00:50:42,960 --> 00:50:54,570 | low right there taken out there. Then on this tweet, which was me saying it on here, when this candle went up, and broke down, I was actually typing this out |
| 279 | 00:50:54,570 --> 00:51:06,450 | here. So if you look at the time, it's 1034, it's showing when you drop it on Twitter, so if you copy any my tweets, and paste it, right mouse button on the |
| 280 | 00:51:06,450 --> 00:51:18,360 | chart anywhere, and then paste the link to anyone on tweets or someone else's tweet, it'll drop it right to where the tweet was made. So this candle here is |
| 281 | 00:51:18,360 --> 00:51:25,860 | 1030 for New York local time. But I was typing it out here as it was trading up into this |
| 282 | 00:51:31,200 --> 00:51:32,430 | right here zoomed in, |
| 283 | 00:51:32,970 --> 00:51:42,600 | which is a fair value gap. The reason why I felt this candle when it was trading up to here, and it was dropping back down. These are all one minute candles. So |
| 284 | 00:51:42,600 --> 00:51:51,690 | here's what's occurring. I'm seeing something, I'm measuring it internally, verifying it through the things that I know and the logic I'm teaching you and |
| 285 | 00:51:51,690 --> 00:51:57,660 | other things that I'm not going to dive out to the public and you can get upset with me all you want. But what I'm teaching you is already lightyears ahead of |
| 286 | 00:51:57,660 --> 00:52:07,440 | everything else, I have to type it out, I gotta type it all out. Sometimes I make a mistake in a typo and I gotta go and fix it. And then I press the button |
| 287 | 00:52:07,440 --> 00:52:20,400 | and it gets to your device. All that takes time. So if I'm utilizing a one minute chart, and I'm saying everything in this candle here, I see it, I want to |
| 288 | 00:52:20,400 --> 00:52:29,340 | react to it. And I'm putting it together and then the next candle shows me here saying if there was any other day I'd be short here, which was this candle right |
| 289 | 00:52:29,340 --> 00:52:38,730 | in this fair value gap right there. Now why would I trust something like that even though it went through it? Look close. This is institutional order flow. |
| 290 | 00:52:38,820 --> 00:52:53,430 | Listen, folks. When this Whoa, was taking now, that was when I liked price, because this candle had already ran up in hit the bottom end of these up close |
| 291 | 00:52:53,430 --> 00:53:02,280 | candles, that series of candles. This is my bearish order block. Look at the opening price there. It's perfect to the tech. I'm sorry, that hurts your |
| 292 | 00:53:02,280 --> 00:53:12,870 | feelings gurus, I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings, other competitive teachers, but there is no comparison to perfect. Nothing beats perfect. This is what the |
| 293 | 00:53:12,870 --> 00:53:26,640 | algorithm does. This is ownership. This is authorship. This is superiority. I'm here to teach, I'm here to prove. And there's nothing better than this. And you |
| 294 | 00:53:26,640 --> 00:53:36,690 | can argue and wrestle and be part of the minority. Or you can just get with the program here and just say okay, I'm going to learn how to do this, you know, I'm |
| 295 | 00:53:36,690 --> 00:53:43,920 | going to learn how to read price better, because this is what the markets doing. Whether you'd like me or my teaching style, this is the market the market |
| 296 | 00:53:43,920 --> 00:53:54,960 | algorithm is coded this way and there's no changes going to be made to it. Okay, so this opening price price runs up to a hits it perfectly in delivers lower |
| 297 | 00:53:54,960 --> 00:54:05,640 | prices. The next candle here creates that fair Vega and then this candle here I see it run up into that and that's when I'm saying okay, this is where I would |
| 298 | 00:54:05,640 --> 00:54:15,300 | be short right as it's doing that. As it runs up and hits the bottom of this candle here at the opening price stops don't record perfect delivery to the |
| 299 | 00:54:15,300 --> 00:54:30,240 | tick. Then it's trading lower the next candle trades up. Next candle trades right back up into this candles opening series of three appcues Candles. The |
| 300 | 00:54:30,240 --> 00:54:42,060 | opening price. That's my waterblock stops it right there dead in its tracks to the tick. He cannot improve on perfection. When I see this type of signature and |
| 301 | 00:54:42,060 --> 00:54:53,160 | runs up here, I'm expecting it to do immediate repricing lower while the next candle opens down here. runs up here for the wick. That's consequent |
| 302 | 00:54:53,160 --> 00:54:59,970 | encouragement, mean threshold of the up close candle here. Perfect delivery. Start looking for the good lower |
| 303 | 00:55:06,120 --> 00:55:19,950 | Here's the afternoon showing the 130 to 415. Time Window. Last hour trading, we'll look at the moment there a gap in here, we trade up into it here, we break |
| 304 | 00:55:19,950 --> 00:55:31,800 | down, returning back to the fair value gap, created another smaller fair gap fair value gap. This is a short, that's a short sell side below here, rips into |
| 305 | 00:55:31,800 --> 00:55:46,080 | it here. If you take this high to that low, expand that lower, as a measured move, create this low in your mind as a fulcrum point, the range high to that |
| 306 | 00:55:46,080 --> 00:55:59,730 | range low, multiply that, then project it lower equally, and you'll get the range loads that we've seen here. I told you to use the fair value gap last |
| 307 | 00:55:59,730 --> 00:56:15,450 | night in the Twitter space and outline to very low levels and 49 43.75 was the actual tick low. You can't improve upon that. That's it hitting it right there |
| 308 | 00:56:15,780 --> 00:56:34,020 | in the market closes it for 15. Now, after hours, you did those trade lower, I don't care about that. I'm teaching you how to operate at the last portion of |
| 309 | 00:56:34,020 --> 00:56:43,440 | the day at 130. If you're bearish, you can use the opening price at 130. Treat that the same way I teach you to use it on the midnight candle in New York. And |
| 310 | 00:56:43,440 --> 00:56:53,340 | at 830. And at 930. If you're bearish, the market rallies above the opening price goes into a premium right as we see here. You can expect this to do what |
| 311 | 00:56:53,910 --> 00:57:02,040 | sell off and treat this whole price movement the same way I teach power three, four, a daily chart, you can treat the same idea of power three within a |
| 312 | 00:57:02,040 --> 00:57:12,450 | session. So everything is fractal. The algorithm sees it just like this opening price. This is a Judas swing, it's all manipulation up into a premium |
| 313 | 00:57:13,740 --> 00:57:14,820 | trades lower |
| 314 | 00:57:16,650 --> 00:57:33,570 | rallies back to the short term, premium array, trades lower fear I got trades up into here, this low being taken out here. This is model 2022. Right here. Now |
| 315 | 00:57:33,570 --> 00:57:45,150 | think I teach you to trade this at the 930 opening, right? Everything is the same. We're just applying it to the market in small little segments the same way |
| 316 | 00:57:45,150 --> 00:57:54,000 | my algorithm does. So the logic the algorithms using is it's using the protection from this opening price when it's bearish and it still has |
| 317 | 00:57:54,000 --> 00:58:04,770 | undelivered targets down here. It's running up creating short term overbought, we don't need an engineer to do that. trades down one more time up until a fair |
| 318 | 00:58:04,770 --> 00:58:14,040 | Vega. And then because of that it creates that short term low. It breaks below that short term low fair value got your eye goes right there from this high down |
| 319 | 00:58:14,040 --> 00:58:25,500 | to that low midpoint equilibrium. So you're looking for fair value gap at or above equilibrium. Where is it at their trades up until here perfectly. Perfect |
| 320 | 00:58:25,590 --> 00:58:41,700 | li breaks down. Here the wick was trading up to midpoint right there. There's no sell. So you can sell here. Pyramid wait for sellside to be broken. There. Were |
| 321 | 00:58:41,880 --> 00:58:52,290 | partial, which is the top of the fair value gap on daily chart, trades down into midpoint consequent curtailment, that's a partial. And as it hits here, you |
| 322 | 00:58:52,290 --> 00:59:01,590 | don't want to use the low of a fair value gap for your target or partials, you always want to come off of that a little bit. Anywhere between a half a point to |
| 323 | 00:59:01,590 --> 00:59:11,160 | a full point, you'll always see me try to do that at the very minimum. Anything more would be you know if I have a lot more targets below which there wasn't |
| 324 | 00:59:11,160 --> 00:59:23,610 | below this for me. I would not try to be fancy dancing, a perfect exit at the low tech is just there's no need for that. So if you were looking for 3943 and |
| 325 | 00:59:23,640 --> 00:59:36,570 | three quarters, there's nothing wrong with 3944 and a quarter 3944 and a half in the content with if it spikes down to your level who cares? You need to have |
| 326 | 00:59:36,570 --> 00:59:48,000 | time and offering for liquidity to pair with your limit order. Because the markets not sitting down here and hanging out at 3943 and three quarters very |
| 327 | 00:59:48,000 --> 00:59:57,360 | long. This is a one minute candle it only goes down here. Bam for one second it's off. So there's something extra no extra charge |
| 328 | 01:00:03,240 --> 01:00:13,140 | And the one minute chart and afternoon session. Here's that fear of a gap from the five minute chart inside the New York lunch hour, extended it out in time, |
| 329 | 01:00:13,530 --> 01:00:24,030 | trade up into here, we shift lower, fair value gap trades back up into it here, we break down. You remember I said once that low was taken out in the afternoon, |
| 330 | 01:00:25,620 --> 01:00:35,310 | after it ran up here, once that low is taken out, which it does here, that's a shift in market structure below the five minute low, we're seeing it on these |
| 331 | 01:00:35,340 --> 01:00:44,220 | individual one minute candles, your eye goes back to what the five minute Fairbury get, which is this rectangle here. You may be looking at this, what's |
| 332 | 01:00:44,220 --> 01:00:46,350 | the anchor to it's anchored to this |
| 333 | 01:00:51,720 --> 01:00:52,320 | right there, |
| 334 | 01:00:53,040 --> 01:01:03,030 | these two lows here on the five minute chart are those single lows on the one minute chart that are separate a little bit wider because I had that chart |
| 335 | 01:01:03,030 --> 01:01:13,320 | zoomed in, in this run right here is back into the five minute fair value gap. refer to these two points here, these two lows in this high refer to this |
| 336 | 01:01:13,350 --> 01:01:24,690 | rectangle, think about where we're showing this. In this with this rectangle. Now watching we go into the one minute chart. That's these two equal lows. On |
| 337 | 01:01:24,690 --> 01:01:31,530 | the five minute chart. When price goes below that, that's a shift at market structure. And then returning back up into that fear of a gap which this |
| 338 | 01:01:31,530 --> 01:01:41,790 | rectangle represents the imbalance or fear of a gap on the five minute chart, I just dropped to a one minute chart in this level is transposed to the one minute |
| 339 | 01:01:41,790 --> 01:01:49,890 | chart and it's going to show all the individual one minute candles, that's that return into the five minute pair Vega that sell right they're in the here's that |
| 340 | 01:01:49,950 --> 01:01:59,250 | run back up into the middle of the wick, you don't see a wick here until there for this timeframe. But this is all a wick on a five minute chart. It's trading |
| 341 | 01:01:59,250 --> 01:02:07,200 | up here into about half that wick and then breaks down creates a fair pay gap here. Here's another partial, how are you getting in here and doing all these |
| 342 | 01:02:07,200 --> 01:02:16,170 | partials you're not seeing every timeframe I'm looking at. I'm looking at a one minute chart, I'm looking at a 32nd chart, I'm looking at a 15 second chart. So |
| 343 | 01:02:16,560 --> 01:02:24,660 | I'm looking for all these things. Once I'm in the right side of the marketplace, I'm going to be hammering, as long as I have room to build into position I have |
| 344 | 01:02:24,990 --> 01:02:39,480 | equity they use in within my risk model. Then I'll take every premium array that it gives me. And I'll build the position to 10 or 14 or 16 contracts. And then |
| 345 | 01:02:40,110 --> 01:02:58,050 | let it go. Vega breaks down the 39 61.75 level. Also, this is an old daily low, as you can see here. That low if you don't know what that is, drop a horizontal |
| 346 | 01:02:58,050 --> 01:03:09,420 | line on 39, six 1.75. And go back up to a daily chart and look back a couple days. And you'll see where that is. It's an old daily low. I mentioned that in a |
| 347 | 01:03:09,420 --> 01:03:21,660 | tweet, told everybody to look for that. And it went down into it here. And I did some shorts up in here and covered below that. And then you can watch the |
| 348 | 01:03:21,660 --> 01:03:31,920 | recording on Twitter right away. But here's an RF signal forming around daily low. And folks that say like, oh, well, it's just classic Support Resistance |
| 349 | 01:03:31,950 --> 01:03:43,440 | isn't there's nothing new under someone ICT That's bogus. Just because it goes back up to that old daily low. If I'm bearish, that's not enough for me. Like I |
| 350 | 01:03:43,440 --> 01:03:52,080 | have to see something like this fair Vega, I got to see something like an institutional order flow or bearish breaker. If I don't have a PV array that the |
| 351 | 01:03:52,080 --> 01:04:00,120 | algorithm is gonna refer to, just because we're below an old daily low and it returns back to it doesn't mean to sell. Just because we went above an old high |
| 352 | 01:04:00,300 --> 01:04:13,170 | and trade back down to it. That's not necessarily a support or high probability long entry. So the folks that are argumentative about what they see me show, |
| 353 | 01:04:13,530 --> 01:04:22,260 | even with executions, which they'll call cherry picked, which beyond me, I don't know how they could say that because I'm outlining it in tweets, only one sided |
| 354 | 01:04:22,590 --> 01:04:31,080 | and then executing with the very levels. I'm calling with the logic that I'm teaching you for free. They're, they're stuck, okay. And it's fun, and I feel |
| 355 | 01:04:31,080 --> 01:04:41,430 | and you're not hurt by this, but I enjoy seeing it because it's denial, denial. That's all it is, and they can't accept it, which I take as a compliment. But |
| 356 | 01:04:41,430 --> 01:04:55,320 | you can't just simply say that what I'm showing you is Support Resistance. I'm showing you what makes Support Resistance, what it is, in reality, imbalances, |
| 357 | 01:04:56,070 --> 01:05:06,870 | fair value gaps that get traded to and when they return back to him later on. That's a real Support and resistance level. It's finite. It's not Bazoom, like a |
| 358 | 01:05:06,870 --> 01:05:16,320 | supply and demand demand zone. It's a very specific level. And there has to be logic. And it has to occur around the specific time. When this occurs here with |
| 359 | 01:05:16,320 --> 01:05:32,130 | this fair value gap, it trades up into it here. What time of day is it, it's during the final hour of trading between 3pm and 415. So this run here, opening |
| 360 | 01:05:32,130 --> 01:05:47,610 | price extending on time, this is a Judas swing, trades on to a fair agar breaks down fair a gap trades of into it. Last hour of the day. Displacement at a Oh |
| 361 | 01:05:47,610 --> 01:05:56,940 | daily low. There's lots of liquidity that comes in around daily highs and lows. So one of the best thing you can do is use your daily chart and use daily highs |
| 362 | 01:05:56,940 --> 01:06:07,290 | and lows over the last three days. So count today is day one, your trading day to day, whatever that day is. That's day one. Yesterday, whether it be |
| 363 | 01:06:07,290 --> 01:06:18,240 | yesterday's trading day or last Friday, if it's like, for instance, if it was say you're trading on a Tuesday, there's a previous day, that would be day two, |
| 364 | 01:06:19,380 --> 01:06:30,960 | on Monday, and then Friday would be day three. And if you're trading like today, to Wednesday is day one, that's the trade day you're trading in, you'd look back |
| 365 | 01:06:30,960 --> 01:06:41,520 | to Tuesday. That's day two, and you look back to Monday, that's day three. So you look back for daily highs and lows for algorithmic trading. So in short, |
| 366 | 01:06:41,550 --> 01:06:50,400 | today, whatever day it would be that you'd be entering the trade. that's day one. Yesterday is day two, and the day before yesterday, whether it be going |
| 367 | 01:06:50,400 --> 01:06:59,940 | into the previous week, Friday, or whatever the previous day is, that's day three, you have the highest high and the lowest low of that total range, you had |
| 368 | 01:06:59,940 --> 01:07:14,460 | the individual highs and the individual lows. That is a dynamic matrix of liquidity that you will never exhaust for future trade setups because it's just |
| 369 | 01:07:14,490 --> 01:07:24,750 | this brilliant. You can see them forming all the time. And this is what it kind of looks like written here. This is a model this is a specific PV array aligned |
| 370 | 01:07:24,750 --> 01:07:36,690 | with an old daily low while bearish. Time of Day last hour trading so the market runs up. It takes people out think it's going to low it's been putting in market |
| 371 | 01:07:36,690 --> 01:07:46,740 | breaks down returns back to a fair a gap sells off aggressively. Look at the bodies of that candle respecting the fairway gap Hi, folks that algorithmic that |
| 372 | 01:07:46,740 --> 01:07:56,700 | that right there. That's a signature proving what I'm teaching you. That price engine is delivering price based on these very things I have codified you are |
| 373 | 01:07:56,700 --> 01:08:10,980 | seeing the evidence of it. It's undeniable. Then it drifts the highs the exact high of the fair Vega, the high this candle is the exact high the fair Vega it |
| 374 | 01:08:10,980 --> 01:08:22,620 | breaks. Vega trades down midpoint of the fair value gap high and low. Consequent encouragement it reacts to that back up to what the fairway get stopped midpoint |
| 375 | 01:08:22,620 --> 01:08:34,110 | of that consequent encouragement. Trades lower comes right back up where the stop at the bottom of the fairway get which is this candles high? Perfectly. It |
| 376 | 01:08:34,110 --> 01:08:48,720 | stops in the midpoint. It starts at the low point, not some ambiguous level in some suppose Id supply zone. I am teaching you technical science, not retail |
| 377 | 01:08:48,750 --> 01:09:00,480 | mumbo jumbo. I'm sorry if that hurts your feelings. But I have to sometimes grab you by the lapel and shake you and say look, pay attention. The details here. |
| 378 | 01:09:01,890 --> 01:09:15,630 | You can argue with them. There's none of none of this exists in supply and demand. It doesn't exist. It doesn't exist in anything else. But my work. I |
| 379 | 01:09:15,630 --> 01:09:24,240 | didn't have to teach this to you. I didn't have to bring it out to the public. And I'll be honest with you, there are some days where I wish I would have never |
| 380 | 01:09:24,240 --> 01:09:40,170 | done it. And I feel guilty by feeling that I do. Because I know I've been gifted with it. And I also know that there are people out there that if they were in my |
| 381 | 01:09:40,170 --> 01:09:54,360 | position, they would be abusing it. And I'm trying to be a good steward with it. If you don't take advantage of what I'm sharing, I'm not going to be alive |
| 382 | 01:09:54,360 --> 01:10:05,430 | forever. Right? You know, if the good Lord comes and takes me yeah Yep. You don't have that experience anymore. You have just whatever I've left behind me. |
| 383 | 01:10:06,870 --> 01:10:16,800 | And I want you to take advantage of the time I'm going to share with you. Because this year, is it. And once it leaves this fair pay gap, Where's it go |
| 384 | 01:10:16,860 --> 01:10:25,680 | right down to the fair value gap low to the tick and stops, trades back up? Where's it stop here? midpoint of the fair value, get re there. Consequent |
| 385 | 01:10:25,680 --> 01:10:39,750 | encroachment Stop. What's the chances of that being just buying and selling pressure and he just happened to be right. The trader that goes into the |
| 386 | 01:10:39,750 --> 01:10:49,020 | marketplace here, the buyers and sellers right that price? What's the chances of them just being exactly where the algorithms going to reprice to for that very |
| 387 | 01:10:49,020 --> 01:10:52,890 | logic? What's the chances of the trader meeting another |
| 388 | 01:10:52,890 --> 01:11:01,770 | trader? Right, that price right there to give that tick? Right at the bottom of that fear Vega? What's the chances of two traders coming together to meet at the |
| 389 | 01:11:01,770 --> 01:11:09,600 | consequent encroachment midpoint perfectly right between this candles? Low and that candles high? What's the chances of that randomly happening? What's the |
| 390 | 01:11:09,600 --> 01:11:17,880 | chances of every one of these candles open and closes? To be exactly on that fair value gap high? What's the chances of that? What's the chances of that |
| 391 | 01:11:18,030 --> 01:11:30,270 | candle stopping dead in its tracks right to the tick at the fair value gap high in this one as well? Folks, listen, at some point, it's absurd. To Arm wrestle |
| 392 | 01:11:30,270 --> 01:11:45,030 | this, it is what it is. It's okay. It's okay. Everybody that believes what they think the market is doing. We all believe that at one point I did. I believe |
| 393 | 01:11:45,030 --> 01:12:04,950 | that too. Until my eyes were opened. And I saw exactly what goes on. And my hands are all over this. My fingerprints are all over this. And for some of you, |
| 394 | 01:12:04,950 --> 01:12:17,160 | that's painful, I'm sorry. I didn't mean for it to be a sharp pointed stick. But you can't change it. You can't undo it. |
| 395 | 01:12:17,699 --> 01:12:18,599 | It is what it is. |
| 396 | 01:12:20,340 --> 01:12:33,810 | And it's my interest for all of you is it just use the information I'm providing you to make changes in your life. While you can. Not all of you're going to get |
| 397 | 01:12:33,810 --> 01:12:41,970 | rich, not all of you're going to find profitability. Some of you are just not going to be disciplined. There's not gonna be a fault of mine. It's certainly |
| 398 | 01:12:41,970 --> 01:12:50,100 | not for a lack of trying on my part. Because I'm proving it my students are proving that it works. I'm proving every day, I'm proving consistency and |
| 399 | 01:12:50,100 --> 01:12:58,170 | precision every single day. And that's all I'm asking you to do is show up. Because if you show up, I'm going to give you evidence every single day. That is |
| 400 | 01:12:58,170 --> 01:13:12,540 | absolutely undisputable. So nobody else has my enigma. Nobody else is going to be able to walk the market like I am on a leash in front of everybody publicly. |
| 401 | 01:13:13,980 --> 01:13:21,450 | I've tweeted it this morning was one of the first tweets I've put out the cherry pick challenge, all you have to do is put out there in public, where the markets |
| 402 | 01:13:21,450 --> 01:13:32,250 | gonna go next. A level not even a specific level. And then you have to engage in trade and trade like you see me doing very precise entries, stop losses really |
| 403 | 01:13:32,250 --> 01:13:48,810 | tight. Pick taking partials along the way specific elements like I've taught my content. I'm sorry. But until you actually try to do that. If you don't want to |
| 404 | 01:13:48,810 --> 01:13:57,240 | believe what I'm teaching, and executing on and showing examples of and my students are actually doing it too. You're not going to appreciate how difficult |
| 405 | 01:13:57,240 --> 01:14:12,300 | this would be to fake. Like I don't have the focus or the attention span because I have difficulties focusing on anything but one thing at a time. So I have to |
| 406 | 01:14:12,300 --> 01:14:21,000 | block out a lot of things that will be distracting conversations around me. TVS playing, you can't have that. So whatever I'm doing, I have to be focused on |
| 407 | 01:14:21,030 --> 01:14:30,900 | that one thing. And I get irritated if I'm taken off of focus. So I don't have multiple monitors and multiple laptops, you know, recording multiple different |
| 408 | 01:14:30,900 --> 01:14:42,720 | setups and then going in, in cherry picking this and cherry picking that now I have the setup I'm looking for and I'm recording it. If it fails, you see it I |
| 409 | 01:14:42,720 --> 01:14:53,220 | have no problem sharing that I showed you this morning. I forced myself to go into the marketplace in the morning trading exactly how I would trade if I had a |
| 410 | 01:14:53,220 --> 01:15:03,180 | gun to my head. What would I do right now. I was able to get five handles but I wasn't able to hold for the majority of the move to get that liquidity run at |
| 411 | 01:15:03,390 --> 01:15:14,850 | 4036 or 4040. So okay, big deal. I don't want to engage in those types of movements I want to be in when the markets really predisposed to be free to |
| 412 | 01:15:14,850 --> 01:15:27,150 | move, give me 10 handles, give me 10 handles have arranged, then I'll operate, then I'll engage then now I'll go in and participate. I can do a lot of these |
| 413 | 01:15:27,150 --> 01:15:38,310 | small little micro moves. What would that look like? Well, we have a fair of a gap here, trades up into that. And let's say that I don't believe that this |
| 414 | 01:15:38,310 --> 01:15:47,190 | moment that it was going to go down to this level here. But I do see this as So what how would I trade to have a look for this load to be taken out? Right |
| 415 | 01:15:47,190 --> 01:15:58,530 | there. So that will, that will be my trade going here. To here, that's a very, very small, little micro range. But that's two and a half handles that you can |
| 416 | 01:15:58,530 --> 01:16:06,600 | get right there. And then do the same thing somewhere else. So there's two and a half handles there. And there's your five handles for the day. But that's not a |
| 417 | 01:16:06,600 --> 01:16:18,690 | lot of money, it's only two or $3. Right. But when you're doing them at 10 contracts, that's 2500 hours per day. You have to think modularly small little |
| 418 | 01:16:18,690 --> 01:16:28,590 | pieces of the elephant is how you devour it. You don't try to swallow it in one bite, smaller incremental moves, and find consistency going in looking for the |
| 419 | 01:16:28,590 --> 01:16:45,690 | surgical strikes that repeat over and over and over again. Everything repeats, there are times when the market will go into sloppy consolidations. You want to |
| 420 | 01:16:45,690 --> 01:16:58,350 | learn from me this year, how to identify that. See what looks like in an ASO study price. Study it don't look at me when I tweet you and say okay, this is |
| 421 | 01:16:58,350 --> 01:17:06,990 | low probability, don't turn your charts off. If you're new, that's not an invitation for you to turn your charts off. That's for you to go in and really |
| 422 | 01:17:06,990 --> 01:17:15,870 | study price. And contemplate okay, what you think's going to happen and see how many times you get wrong. Set? Well, you understand, this is painful if I try to |
| 423 | 01:17:15,870 --> 01:17:25,830 | push. Now for my seasoned students, they are to turn the charts off and walk away because they understand that they've been here before. A lot of you have |
| 424 | 01:17:25,830 --> 01:17:34,890 | just met me this year. A lot of you have seen me before her terrible things that aren't true about me. And then said, I'm going to ignore I'm going to ignore |
| 425 | 01:17:34,890 --> 01:17:43,470 | this guy. Okay, he's a scammer. He's a fraud, he can't do anything. He's not show me anything. That's different. When you really take a step into this realm |
| 426 | 01:17:43,500 --> 01:17:57,330 | that I've created. And you see proof, you see elements of precision executions, calling it beforehand, and students that are doing it and making real money. So |
| 427 | 01:17:59,370 --> 01:18:10,710 | I believe that this week was very fruitful, we had a very productive week. And because it has delivered, what I would reasonably expect for the entire range |
| 428 | 01:18:10,830 --> 01:18:24,000 | for the week, I'm done. I'm not going to be doing very much on Twitter. And I won't be doing anything else on YouTube for the rest of the week. So you have |
| 429 | 01:18:24,030 --> 01:18:35,520 | plenty to go through and study, you have tweets to look at back testing and things to look at. And I will resume obviously going into the weekend, I'll give |
| 430 | 01:18:35,520 --> 01:18:46,890 | you my pre market analysis again on Sunday. And I'll try I'll try to do my best to have it up by 11 o'clock on Sunday. But understand that I am a family man, I |
| 431 | 01:18:46,890 --> 01:18:59,760 | have a wife that likes to tell me when when I can't do certain things like anybody else's wife does. And to be happy in in, in a blissful state of |
| 432 | 01:18:59,760 --> 01:19:12,780 | marriage, I try to do what I can to keep her happy. So my weekend schedule is obviously in the hands of my family, I can have plans going in. But they dictate |
| 433 | 01:19:12,780 --> 01:19:22,680 | everything. In the weekdays, I control everything. But on the weekends I relinquish that control and allow my family to call the shots. And if they make |
| 434 | 01:19:22,680 --> 01:19:31,860 | a decision and take take me out of what I would have allotted for my time to do the recording or the analysis. You're just going to have to accept that. Okay, I |
| 435 | 01:19:31,860 --> 01:19:41,670 | had several people complain, can you do it earlier? This isn't fair to us, the you gotta it's gotta be fair for me. And the guy that's doing it for free, and |
| 436 | 01:19:42,510 --> 01:19:53,070 | it has to be something that I can accommodate them own personal life. And if it doesn't line up with your time, I mean, it's not meant to be you know, abrasive. |
| 437 | 01:19:53,100 --> 01:20:00,270 | I'm not trying to offend any of you or make it harder for you. But also I'm a real person. I'm not artificial intelligence. I have children. I have a Life, |
| 438 | 01:20:00,270 --> 01:20:10,710 | I've had life. I have hobbies, I have things and I'm running businesses. I mean, it's, you know, there's other things, except for all of you. And and sometimes |
| 439 | 01:20:10,710 --> 01:20:23,610 | it feels like there's nobody else but you. But there's a whole lot more things going on. And I do want to help you. But sometimes I have the entitlement minded |
| 440 | 01:20:23,670 --> 01:20:32,670 | students that come to me expecting have a third way mentorship when their time frame and time schedule one. I'm sorry, I just don't like to deal with folks |
| 441 | 01:20:32,670 --> 01:20:42,570 | like that. I think that's going to be it for this one. I've had fun this week. I've had a wonderful time sharing. And I put a lot of time in this week, so I'm |
| 442 | 01:20:42,570 --> 01:20:51,060 | kind of tired. My energy level is really low. And I'm going to use the rest of the week to rest so that we aren't charged up for next week. So I wish you a |
| 443 | 01:20:51,060 --> 01:20:57,150 | very pleasant week. And weekend, be safe. And I'll touch base with you again on Sunday. |