Wiki source code of OTE Pattern Recognition Series - Vol 09.srt
Version 1.1 by Drunk Monkey on 2020-11-20 16:23
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 00:00:10,920 ~-~-> 00:00:14,280 | ||
| 3 | ICT: Okay, folks, welcome back. This is volume number nine | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | 2 | ||
| 6 | 00:00:14,310 ~-~-> 00:00:17,910 | ||
| 7 | in a continuing series of 20 videos for the ICT optimal | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | 3 | ||
| 10 | 00:00:17,910 ~-~-> 00:00:22,620 | ||
| 11 | trade entry pattern recognition series for YouTube. Before I | ||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | 4 | ||
| 14 | 00:00:22,620 ~-~-> 00:00:26,910 | ||
| 15 | get into this, just as a reminder, you can also take a look | ||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | 5 | ||
| 18 | 00:00:26,910 ~-~-> 00:00:32,460 | ||
| 19 | at the British pound, pound versus dollar. And you'll see | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | 6 | ||
| 22 | 00:00:32,460 ~-~-> 00:00:35,730 | ||
| 23 | that it gave us a optimal trade entry during the New York | ||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | 7 | ||
| 26 | 00:00:35,730 ~-~-> 00:00:40,950 | ||
| 27 | session running out to previous day's high. So it's kinda | ||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | 8 | ||
| 30 | 00:00:40,950 ~-~-> 00:00:44,670 | ||
| 31 | like a twofer today, but I want to use the Euro Aussie today | ||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | 9 | ||
| 34 | 00:00:44,670 ~-~-> 00:00:47,940 | ||
| 35 | because it's a pair I don't do too much discussion about and | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | 10 | ||
| 38 | 00:00:47,940 ~-~-> 00:00:54,000 | ||
| 39 | I want you to take a look at the low from the 18th over | ||
| 40 | |||
| 41 | 11 | ||
| 42 | 00:00:54,000 ~-~-> 00:00:58,320 | ||
| 43 | here. And this is going to be a question it's going to pop | ||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | 12 | ||
| 46 | 00:00:58,320 ~-~-> 00:01:00,750 | ||
| 47 | up if you haven't already had it. Come up. In the | ||
| 48 | |||
| 49 | 13 | ||
| 50 | 00:01:00,780 ~-~-> 00:01:04,140 | ||
| 51 | progression through this series, what happens if the next | ||
| 52 | |||
| 53 | 14 | ||
| 54 | 00:01:04,140 ~-~-> 00:01:09,450 | ||
| 55 | day we go through it a little bit, but does go higher? Or | ||
| 56 | |||
| 57 | 15 | ||
| 58 | 00:01:09,750 ~-~-> 00:01:12,420 | ||
| 59 | just because it goes below it, and we're expecting it to go | ||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | 16 | ||
| 62 | 00:01:12,420 ~-~-> 00:01:17,010 | ||
| 63 | below the previous day's low? Doesn't that negate taking a | ||
| 64 | |||
| 65 | 17 | ||
| 66 | 00:01:17,010 ~-~-> 00:01:20,040 | ||
| 67 | New York session trade? And the question is answered with | ||
| 68 | |||
| 69 | 18 | ||
| 70 | 00:01:20,040 ~-~-> 00:01:25,470 | ||
| 71 | simply now, as you'll see now, take a look at this. Here's | ||
| 72 | |||
| 73 | 19 | ||
| 74 | 00:01:25,470 ~-~-> 00:01:29,670 | ||
| 75 | Monday's low on the Euro Aussie. So we project that in | ||
| 76 | |||
| 77 | 20 | ||
| 78 | 00:01:29,700 ~-~-> 00:01:33,150 | ||
| 79 | future this is what I refer to as a shallow run. And | ||
| 80 | |||
| 81 | 21 | ||
| 82 | 00:01:33,180 ~-~-> 00:01:36,540 | ||
| 83 | basically it This leaves unfinished business. Okay, the | ||
| 84 | |||
| 85 | 22 | ||
| 86 | 00:01:36,540 ~-~-> 00:01:40,260 | ||
| 87 | markets warning later at another time, run back to that | ||
| 88 | |||
| 89 | 23 | ||
| 90 | 00:01:40,260 ~-~-> 00:01:44,190 | ||
| 91 | liquidity just in the same capacity does it here. We have an | ||
| 92 | |||
| 93 | 24 | ||
| 94 | 00:01:44,220 ~-~-> 00:01:47,550 | ||
| 95 | old high from the 18th and it runs above it very shallow, | ||
| 96 | |||
| 97 | 25 | ||
| 98 | 00:01:47,970 ~-~-> 00:01:51,750 | ||
| 99 | then runs down below the Monday low, then it rallies all the | ||
| 100 | |||
| 101 | 26 | ||
| 102 | 00:01:51,750 ~-~-> 00:01:54,660 | ||
| 103 | way back above these relatively equal highs, clearing that | ||
| 104 | |||
| 105 | 27 | ||
| 106 | 00:01:54,660 ~-~-> 00:01:57,930 | ||
| 107 | liquidity out. Then and only then does it come down to make | ||
| 108 | |||
| 109 | 28 | ||
| 110 | 00:01:57,930 ~-~-> 00:02:01,980 | ||
| 111 | a more significant run below. Monday's low and the initial | ||
| 112 | |||
| 113 | 29 | ||
| 114 | 00:02:01,980 ~-~-> 00:02:07,560 | ||
| 115 | daily low formed here in New York session, based on our | ||
| 116 | |||
| 117 | 30 | ||
| 118 | 00:02:07,560 ~-~-> 00:02:11,940 | ||
| 119 | rules, we're looking for an optimal trade entry after seeing | ||
| 120 | |||
| 121 | 31 | ||
| 122 | 00:02:11,940 ~-~-> 00:02:15,270 | ||
| 123 | a run above relative equal highs and a shallow run here, and | ||
| 124 | |||
| 125 | 32 | ||
| 126 | 00:02:15,270 ~-~-> 00:02:18,600 | ||
| 127 | it's starting to really gain momentum at this point, if we | ||
| 128 | |||
| 129 | 33 | ||
| 130 | 00:02:18,600 ~-~-> 00:02:21,780 | ||
| 131 | see a retracement like this, we had now a shallow run here, | ||
| 132 | |||
| 133 | 34 | ||
| 134 | 00:02:22,080 ~-~-> 00:02:25,710 | ||
| 135 | and a shallow run here. That means that it's really primed | ||
| 136 | |||
| 137 | 35 | ||
| 138 | 00:02:25,770 ~-~-> 00:02:28,980 | ||
| 139 | to make it more significant run lower just later in the day, | ||
| 140 | |||
| 141 | 36 | ||
| 142 | 00:02:28,980 ~-~-> 00:02:32,880 | ||
| 143 | and we're going to use the New York session time of day to | ||
| 144 | |||
| 145 | 37 | ||
| 146 | 00:02:32,880 ~-~-> 00:02:37,830 | ||
| 147 | look for an optimal trade entry. This high to this low price | ||
| 148 | |||
| 149 | 38 | ||
| 150 | 00:02:37,830 ~-~-> 00:02:40,800 | ||
| 151 | retraces back to the 70.5 level just a little bit above | ||
| 152 | |||
| 153 | 39 | ||
| 154 | 00:02:40,800 ~-~-> 00:02:44,370 | ||
| 155 | that. But keeping with the rules of this model, we're using | ||
| 156 | |||
| 157 | 40 | ||
| 158 | 00:02:44,370 ~-~-> 00:02:49,830 | ||
| 159 | the 62% retracement level. In this case it's 166 97 and five | ||
| 160 | |||
| 161 | 41 | ||
| 162 | 00:02:49,830 ~-~-> 00:02:53,940 | ||
| 163 | pips as our entry stock would have to be at this high. The | ||
| 164 | |||
| 165 | 42 | ||
| 166 | 00:02:53,940 ~-~-> 00:02:58,260 | ||
| 167 | trade has seven pips drawdown theoretically and expansion | ||
| 168 | |||
| 169 | 43 | ||
| 170 | 00:02:58,260 ~-~-> 00:03:02,610 | ||
| 171 | down takes out the short term low. He And we can offer 30 | ||
| 172 | |||
| 173 | 44 | ||
| 174 | 00:03:02,610 ~-~-> 00:03:07,620 | ||
| 175 | pips as a partial retraces back to Monday's old daily low. | ||
| 176 | |||
| 177 | 45 | ||
| 178 | 00:03:08,160 ~-~-> 00:03:11,250 | ||
| 179 | And then the further expansion down again, consolidates and | ||
| 180 | |||
| 181 | 46 | ||
| 182 | 00:03:11,250 ~-~-> 00:03:14,760 | ||
| 183 | finally makes a run, offering one half of the standard | ||
| 184 | |||
| 185 | 47 | ||
| 186 | 00:03:14,760 ~-~-> 00:03:19,320 | ||
| 187 | deviation of the dealing range used for the fib. So 30 pips | ||
| 188 | |||
| 189 | 48 | ||
| 190 | 00:03:19,350 ~-~-> 00:03:24,930 | ||
| 191 | offered 50 pips offered from this run here to here. That | ||
| 192 | |||
| 193 | 49 | ||
| 194 | 00:03:24,960 ~-~-> 00:03:27,600 | ||
| 195 | honestly is what I'm looking for once a week. I'm not in | ||
| 196 | |||
| 197 | 50 | ||
| 198 | 00:03:27,600 ~-~-> 00:03:31,140 | ||
| 199 | here trying to do a whole lot. So if I capture 50 to 75 pips | ||
| 200 | |||
| 201 | 51 | ||
| 202 | 00:03:31,140 ~-~-> 00:03:35,640 | ||
| 203 | a week, I'm pretty much done. So hopefully his examples been | ||
| 204 | |||
| 205 | 52 | ||
| 206 | 00:03:35,640 ~-~-> 00:03:40,200 | ||
| 207 | insightful in regards to do we consider taking the previous | ||
| 208 | |||
| 209 | 53 | ||
| 210 | 00:03:40,200 ~-~-> 00:03:43,110 | ||
| 211 | day's low or previous day's high in New York session if it's | ||
| 212 | |||
| 213 | 54 | ||
| 214 | 00:03:43,110 ~-~-> 00:03:48,450 | ||
| 215 | already done so even in a small capacity? Now, the answer is | ||
| 216 | |||
| 217 | 55 | ||
| 218 | 00:03:48,510 ~-~-> 00:03:50,850 | ||
| 219 | you want to stick with where the liquidity is going to be | ||
| 220 | |||
| 221 | 56 | ||
| 222 | 00:03:50,850 ~-~-> 00:03:54,090 | ||
| 223 | reaching relative to the previous day's high or low. And if | ||
| 224 | |||
| 225 | 57 | ||
| 226 | 00:03:54,090 ~-~-> 00:03:57,510 | ||
| 227 | it's not really clear, just simply stay out. And that way | ||
| 228 | |||
| 229 | 58 | ||
| 230 | 00:03:57,510 ~-~-> 00:04:01,380 | ||
| 231 | you can leave the fight another day without Needless risk, | ||
| 232 | |||
| 233 | 59 | ||
| 234 | 00:04:01,740 ~-~-> 00:04:04,830 | ||
| 235 | or focus on another pair. Until next time, wish good luck | ||
| 236 | |||
| 237 | 60 | ||
| 238 | 00:04:04,860 ~-~-> 00:04:05,610 | ||
| 239 | and good trading. |