ICT YT - 2025-01-21 - Live Execution NQ PreMarket Turtle Soup Short
Last modified by Drunk Monkey on 2025-04-03 12:09
| 1 | 00:00:00 --> 00:00:14 | ICT: Good morning, folks. This is Michael, so I'm going to be looking at |
| 2 | 00:00:14 --> 00:00:21 | shorting the NASDAQ. We're looking at a two minute chart here, simply because |
| 3 | 00:00:21 --> 00:00:23 | that's where the inefficiencies are obvious. For me, |
| 4 | 00:00:25 --> 00:00:31 | I'm going to set a limit to sell short inside of a |
| 5 | 00:00:31 --> 00:00:35 | sell side of balance, buy side and efficiency. I'll note that in a moment, |
| 6 | 00:00:35 --> 00:00:41 | it's also aiming for the sell side liquidity pool resting relative equal |
| 7 | 00:00:41 --> 00:00:42 | lows right here. |
| 8 | 00:00:47 --> 00:00:54 | Okay, so there's my target and my stop loss. Stop Loss is above the first |
| 9 | 00:00:54 --> 00:00:58 | candle in the city, which I'll note for you here. I'm including the volume |
| 10 | 00:00:58 --> 00:01:01 | imbalance. You'll notice that at the lower end of it. |
| 11 | 00:01:09 --> 00:01:14 | And now that we're back in side of it, the limit order to be short, one |
| 12 | 00:01:14 --> 00:01:19 | contract has been filled. If it can go to consequent encouragement of that |
| 13 | 00:01:19 --> 00:01:27 | city, I'll be interested in selling more, annotating the buy stop liquidity |
| 14 | 00:01:27 --> 00:01:33 | rate, so that liquidity has been purged. So the market should explore lower, |
| 15 | 00:01:33 --> 00:01:36 | looking back into yesterday's regular trading hours. So |
| 16 | 00:01:43 --> 00:01:44 | okay, I'm adding there |
| 17 | 00:01:45 --> 00:01:49 | just around the continent, encroachment. Gotta fix this. This isn't where I |
| 18 | 00:01:49 --> 00:01:54 | wanted it on the top left, and we'll make it a little bit bigger so we can |
| 19 | 00:01:54 --> 00:02:00 | see it. Okay? So essentially, it's a turtle soup and it's a deferred entry. |
| 20 | 00:02:00 --> 00:02:11 | I'm all |
| 21 | 00:02:11 --> 00:02:19 | right, so presently short two risk is defined at the high of the city. |
| 22 | 00:02:22 --> 00:02:30 | And again, aiming for the sell side liquidity down here. This is kind of |
| 23 | 00:02:30 --> 00:02:38 | like a classic setup where we've already ran out liquidity prior to the opening |
| 24 | 00:02:38 --> 00:02:40 | bell at 930 Eastern time. |
| 25 | 00:02:42 --> 00:02:46 | So we have a shift in market structure, and I'm adding more here. |
| 26 | 00:02:47 --> 00:02:51 | If I can get four contracts on I'll certainly try to do it. But the |
| 27 | 00:02:52 --> 00:03:04 | opportunity to get a break below the low formed at around 21,006 98 98 that |
| 28 | 00:03:04 --> 00:03:09 | should start to accelerate things as long as you stay in the lower half of |
| 29 | 00:03:09 --> 00:03:15 | that city. That's noted here. Once we break that low, magnify this a little |
| 30 | 00:03:17 --> 00:03:22 | bit, see the bodies of the wicks better. Okay, |
| 31 | 00:03:23 --> 00:03:28 | so if we can see that that low I'm having the limit order to cover the |
| 32 | 00:03:28 --> 00:03:32 | short at again, was referenced on the relative equal lows. |
| 33 | 00:03:32 --> 00:03:33 | So don't lose sight of that. So |
| 34 | 00:03:44 --> 00:03:50 | I'd like to see it break below that swing low that's just recently formed, |
| 35 | 00:03:53 --> 00:04:01 | and then it can work back up and touch the bottom end of that city again. And |
| 36 | 00:04:01 --> 00:04:04 | I'll annotate the inversion fair value gap. |
| 37 | 00:04:06 --> 00:04:10 | Now that I think it's validated, |
| 38 | 00:04:18 --> 00:04:24 | we're going to look here at the i time here. |
| 39 | 00:04:27 --> 00:04:34 | Notice the run higher to take out the buy side started at 7am that's classic |
| 40 | 00:04:34 --> 00:04:36 | pre market session activity. |
| 41 | 00:04:41 --> 00:04:42 | Now in a perfect world, |
| 42 | 00:04:44 --> 00:04:48 | we could just start going lower, but because we're just ahead of the 930 |
| 43 | 00:04:48 --> 00:04:53 | opening bell, it might want to whipsaw a little bit in here. I don't feel that |
| 44 | 00:04:53 --> 00:04:59 | the stop loss is in jeopardy. Could be hit. If it does get hit, I'll look to. |
| 45 | 00:05:00 --> 00:05:00 | Short. |
| 46 | 00:05:13 --> 00:05:14 | Okay, so |
| 47 | 00:05:16 --> 00:05:23 | one of the things that we move this underneath that low, one of the things |
| 48 | 00:05:23 --> 00:05:30 | that I like to see is the unwillingness for price to get back to the premium |
| 49 | 00:05:30 --> 00:05:34 | side of an array, like, for instance, the sell side imbalance, Python |
| 50 | 00:05:34 --> 00:05:40 | efficiency. That little red box I've highlighted here, we've already worked |
| 51 | 00:05:40 --> 00:05:44 | in the upper half of that. So I want to see it stay in the lower half. If it |
| 52 | 00:05:44 --> 00:05:49 | does go back and trade to it, if it does again, trade inside of that. I'm not |
| 53 | 00:05:49 --> 00:05:54 | really unnerved by that. It's completely permissible because of the opening range |
| 54 | 00:05:54 --> 00:05:59 | beginning in a couple seconds. Usually there's a little bit of a flurry of |
| 55 | 00:05:59 --> 00:06:07 | action, right, like that. Okay, see how quickly it just sharply rejected that. |
| 56 | 00:06:13 --> 00:06:18 | These are all signatures. I like to see when prices giving indication that it's |
| 57 | 00:06:18 --> 00:06:21 | unlikely. On side. Now, all of this might make you nervous. If you're |
| 58 | 00:06:21 --> 00:06:25 | watching it, you're looking at that stop loss, thinking it's going to run up here |
| 59 | 00:06:25 --> 00:06:31 | and jump and hit that and maybe it can. Maybe it might do it. But I'm not |
| 60 | 00:06:31 --> 00:06:34 | thinking that I want to see it break down and make a lower low than that |
| 61 | 00:06:34 --> 00:06:35 | swing low |
| 62 | 00:06:37 --> 00:06:38 | one candle ago. |
| 63 | 00:06:46 --> 00:06:55 | There we go. Now, any retracement back up into the low of that Sibi? If it does |
| 64 | 00:06:55 --> 00:07:03 | so, I'll add one more contract, stop loss. I'm not interested in moving yet. |
| 65 | 00:07:06 --> 00:07:11 | Now I'm looking at about the middle of it, okay, so approximately where my |
| 66 | 00:07:11 --> 00:07:17 | average entry price is for the existing short position, if it can trade back |
| 67 | 00:07:17 --> 00:07:22 | into that same price level, I will try to time that with a market order to |
| 68 | 00:07:22 --> 00:07:23 | Shell one more. |
| 69 | 00:07:37 --> 00:07:41 | I don't think that it's going to give me a chance, so I'm going to just add it |
| 70 | 00:07:41 --> 00:07:44 | there now, so I'm still technically inside the |
| 71 | 00:07:46 --> 00:07:46 | the city, |
| 72 | 00:07:53 --> 00:08:00 | and also the inversion pair value gap Right before the buy side liquidity is |
| 73 | 00:08:00 --> 00:08:07 | taken. I'll take that in a moment. I'm trying to pay attention to what this is |
| 74 | 00:08:07 --> 00:08:08 | actually doing. |
| 75 | 00:08:22 --> 00:08:26 | Like that's nice, and let's take it real heavy in here. And |
| 76 | 00:08:27 --> 00:08:30 | again, you're probably wondering, why am I looking at two minute chart? Is there |
| 77 | 00:08:30 --> 00:08:34 | some kind of secret to that today? No, just the city I'm highlighting here can |
| 78 | 00:08:34 --> 00:08:40 | be drawn out over one two minute candle versus the broken up one minute |
| 79 | 00:08:41 --> 00:08:46 | imbalance. It's got multiple fair value gaps on the one minute chart in the same |
| 80 | 00:08:46 --> 00:08:49 | range that's highlighted here. So that's the only advantage I'm using the two |
| 81 | 00:08:49 --> 00:08:55 | minute chart. So I taught this in the 2024 video lineup on the YouTube |
| 82 | 00:08:55 --> 00:08:57 | channel. So you can go back and listen to that. |
| 83 | 00:08:57 --> 00:08:58 | I made that very clear, |
| 84 | 00:09:02 --> 00:09:05 | once you have a bias, you know you're looking for you know the drawn |
| 85 | 00:09:05 --> 00:09:08 | liquidity, all those things |
| 86 | 00:09:09 --> 00:09:11 | are foundational, |
| 87 | 00:09:12 --> 00:09:16 | but the timing is based on either a five minute, four minute, three minute, two |
| 88 | 00:09:16 --> 00:09:21 | minute or one minute chart, whichever one has the cleanest inefficiency that |
| 89 | 00:09:21 --> 00:09:23 | you can work with define that type of thing. |
| 90 | 00:09:31 --> 00:09:35 | It can touch the lower end of that, but if it trades up inside of that pink box |
| 91 | 00:09:36 --> 00:09:41 | I wanted to see it stay in the lower half. That's very, very critical. |
| 92 | 00:09:43 --> 00:09:44 | And it's also |
| 93 | 00:09:45 --> 00:09:50 | working in the the aspects of this inversion fair value. If I get this |
| 94 | 00:09:50 --> 00:09:53 | thing to drop on the right candle, there you go, I'm. |
| 95 | 00:10:01 --> 00:10:08 | So far, it's a little unorganized, but withdrawal is still very much obvious. |
| 96 | 00:10:08 --> 00:10:12 | The liquidity has been taken on the buy side. Traders that are buying on a |
| 97 | 00:10:12 --> 00:10:19 | breakout, they're caught offside right now. They don't realize it yet right now |
| 98 | 00:10:19 --> 00:10:21 | that there's hoping it's going to move in their favor. |
| 99 | 00:10:22 --> 00:10:32 | So half of |
| 100 | 00:10:32 --> 00:10:37 | that inversion, fair value gap, the one it's orange. I want to see price stay |
| 101 | 00:10:37 --> 00:10:40 | below that as well. So it's a combination of two things. I want to see |
| 102 | 00:10:40 --> 00:10:44 | stay in the lower half of the pink box, which is the city, and I want to see it |
| 103 | 00:10:44 --> 00:10:48 | stay in the lower half of that orange box, which is the inversion fair value |
| 104 | 00:10:48 --> 00:10:52 | cap. So my my thought process is, I'm going to break lower and go below that |
| 105 | 00:10:52 --> 00:10:54 | low right here. That's what I'm annotating. So that candlestick should |
| 106 | 00:10:54 --> 00:11:00 | be the definition of the high of that return back into both city and inversion |
| 107 | 00:11:00 --> 00:11:01 | fair value cut. |
| 108 | 00:11:06 --> 00:11:12 | So if my read on price is accurate, it should be unlikely to trade in the upper |
| 109 | 00:11:12 --> 00:11:16 | half of both of those rectangles I've drawn highlighting inefficiencies I'm |
| 110 | 00:11:26 --> 00:11:30 | that's about where I was filled on that fourth contract. So I want to highlight |
| 111 | 00:11:30 --> 00:11:36 | the midpoint here you can see consequent encroachment. Pretty much nailed it. So |
| 112 | 00:11:36 --> 00:11:43 | I would have added that fourth one when it just was touching the low that. So |
| 113 | 00:11:43 --> 00:11:47 | either way, I would have got that fourth contract on I'm going to sit Pat with |
| 114 | 00:11:47 --> 00:11:51 | what I am right now. I don't want to go anymore, and I'm not going to do any |
| 115 | 00:11:51 --> 00:11:56 | partials. So it's going to be a full pull to sell side liquidity. If I can |
| 116 | 00:11:56 --> 00:12:05 | get it, it starts to break down in here, that'll be a good indication. I want to |
| 117 | 00:12:05 --> 00:12:10 | see a lot of heaviness, big, long, stretched out black candles. So I want |
| 118 | 00:12:10 --> 00:12:17 | to see a lot of desire for price to the probe blower and close in some of that |
| 119 | 00:12:17 --> 00:12:21 | opening range gap that's not clearly defined here, but I'll let you look at |
| 120 | 00:12:21 --> 00:12:29 | your charts in relationship to that idea. I'm trying to keep the annotation |
| 121 | 00:12:29 --> 00:12:32 | as light as possible, because I don't usually put this stuff on the chart when |
| 122 | 00:12:32 --> 00:12:36 | I'm trading. But for the sake of you watching and following along with the |
| 123 | 00:12:36 --> 00:12:42 | logic, where was my premise on entry? Why was my entries, where they were. |
| 124 | 00:12:43 --> 00:12:47 | You're seeing that here. So far, this is exactly what I want to see. I want to |
| 125 | 00:12:47 --> 00:12:54 | see a lot of heaviness here. There's a little bit more. I want to drop that |
| 126 | 00:12:54 --> 00:12:54 | stop, |
| 127 | 00:12:56 --> 00:12:57 | reduce some of the risk. I |
| 128 | 00:13:00 --> 00:13:04 | won't be so interested in chasing with the stop loss, but I want to reduce it |
| 129 | 00:13:04 --> 00:13:10 | now here, and that'll stay with the life of the trade. Now, not interested in |
| 130 | 00:13:10 --> 00:13:16 | moving anything else. It comes back and stops me out. It covers commission |
| 131 | 00:13:16 --> 00:13:23 | costs. It gives me enough for a pizza dinner, and it'll be whatever it is. But |
| 132 | 00:13:23 --> 00:13:27 | I'm more interested in following along with price action. Does it want to reach |
| 133 | 00:13:27 --> 00:13:32 | for that low? And if it does, it might punch through it a little bit further |
| 134 | 00:13:32 --> 00:13:39 | than the limit order is marked. So if it does so, it might not reflect the |
| 135 | 00:13:39 --> 00:13:45 | execution label. So I want to take that in consideration here, and kind of like |
| 136 | 00:13:45 --> 00:13:49 | scrunch the chart up a little bit vertically, so that way, if it does go |
| 137 | 00:13:49 --> 00:13:49 | below it, |
| 138 | 00:13:51 --> 00:14:02 | it should allow me to share that with you. I hate when they do that. It should |
| 139 | 00:14:02 --> 00:14:06 | film. Here you go. Hope you enjoyed it. Take care and be safe. Bye. |