ICT YT - 2024-09-17 - ICT 2024 Mentorship - Lecture 29
Last modified by Drunk Monkey on 2024-09-25 09:33
| 1 | 00:01:00 --> 00:01:18 | ICT: Good morning, folks, guys, can give me a heads up on Twitter, if you can |
| 2 | 00:01:18 --> 00:01:28 | hear me, you Good morning. Good morning. Good morning. |
| 3 | 00:01:37 --> 00:01:38 | Can you hear me? Hello, testing. I |
| 4 | 00:01:44 --> 00:01:55 | All right, there's the opening bell. Can you guys hear me? Hello, yeah. I'm not |
| 5 | 00:01:55 --> 00:01:59 | sure why the volume's not higher, so leaving comments and telling me that the |
| 6 | 00:01:59 --> 00:02:03 | volume's low, I can't help you, everything's set to its maximum setting |
| 7 | 00:02:03 --> 00:02:03 | to |
| 8 | 00:02:09 --> 00:02:13 | all right lower left hand corner. Five minute chart. We have a opening range, |
| 9 | 00:02:13 --> 00:02:15 | gap premium opium. I |
| 10 | 00:02:32 --> 00:02:46 | Okay, sweeping Friday's high once more you look on the set minute time frame, |
| 11 | 00:02:46 --> 00:02:51 | 15 in time frame. We have it in. Well, get the |
| 12 | 00:02:56 --> 00:03:03 | around the 850s got a bit of a migraine today, so my pace is going to be a |
| 13 | 00:03:03 --> 00:03:08 | little bit slower. Some of you will probably you'll probably appreciate that |
| 14 | 00:03:13 --> 00:03:14 | seasonal stuff. I |
| 15 | 00:03:40 --> 00:03:51 | All right, so inside the opening range gap, which is presently shaded green, |
| 16 | 00:03:51 --> 00:03:57 | but I change that because it's not what I want to to highlight. I keep the same |
| 17 | 00:03:58 --> 00:04:03 | colors I'm using when I teach Caleb, not that I have this kind of stuff on my |
| 18 | 00:04:03 --> 00:04:08 | chart is extremely distracting, but I don't know how else I can you draw |
| 19 | 00:04:08 --> 00:04:12 | attention to certain things unless I put lipstick all over this stuff. So, all |
| 20 | 00:04:19 --> 00:04:23 | right, today's topic is and as a reminder, I won't be live streaming |
| 21 | 00:04:23 --> 00:04:28 | tomorrow, so it's the Fed's rate announcement that's something that I |
| 22 | 00:04:28 --> 00:04:33 | would have my son completely avoid trading because he's too inexperienced. |
| 23 | 00:04:36 --> 00:04:38 | So I won't be live streaming. To keep that I |
| 24 | 00:04:45 --> 00:04:51 | as an enticement from him, you're welcome to obviously do that. I'm sure |
| 25 | 00:04:53 --> 00:04:59 | everybody else will be streaming. But today's topic is going to be what |
| 26 | 00:04:59 --> 00:05:04 | happens if you miss. Your your entry. So you're watching a particular time frame. |
| 27 | 00:05:06 --> 00:05:09 | You get a green light that it's good for you to take a trade and just either you |
| 28 | 00:05:09 --> 00:05:14 | sit still, you freeze up, you second guess it, or you turn the charts on |
| 29 | 00:05:14 --> 00:05:20 | late, or you didn't notice it, and then it's now after the fact. So how do you |
| 30 | 00:05:20 --> 00:05:25 | how do you work with that? So we'll be, we'll be dealing with that topic. If you |
| 31 | 00:05:25 --> 00:05:29 | look at the five minute chart here in the lower left hand corner, I like that |
| 32 | 00:05:29 --> 00:05:42 | sell side right here, and the September I'm assuming this is 16, really, because |
| 33 | 00:05:44 --> 00:05:49 | I know it might be the right one. I don't trust the dates on these, so I'm |
| 34 | 00:05:49 --> 00:05:55 | trying not to call attention to the dates. I'm also testing it to see if |
| 35 | 00:05:55 --> 00:06:03 | they agree with the ones I have. But anyway, because we open up with a |
| 36 | 00:06:03 --> 00:06:08 | premium gap opening range gap higher than previous day's settlement, it's |
| 37 | 00:06:08 --> 00:06:12 | more it's most likely, you know, a 70% chance, that in the first 10, I'm sorry, |
| 38 | 00:06:12 --> 00:06:18 | 30 minutes before 10 o'clock, or by 10 o'clock, it trades to mid gap. So we're |
| 39 | 00:06:18 --> 00:06:23 | looking for this price down here, and it's also pool liquidity resting on this |
| 40 | 00:06:23 --> 00:06:24 | little base of price action. |
| 41 | 00:06:34 --> 00:06:44 | So first presentation fair value gap is here, right there? So this is |
| 42 | 00:06:52 --> 00:06:59 | hopefully, if all things are good this morning, I won't have a very long |
| 43 | 00:06:59 --> 00:07:08 | session, which is my intended goal. And let's take the midline off of that, |
| 44 | 00:07:08 --> 00:07:10 | because I want to see it. |
| 45 | 00:07:15 --> 00:07:27 | There you go, and we're going to work primarily off of the one and 15 second |
| 46 | 00:07:27 --> 00:07:31 | chart today. Now, I know some of you don't, you don't have it, don't have |
| 47 | 00:07:31 --> 00:07:36 | access to it because of your, I guess, your plan, or whatever. You don't have |
| 48 | 00:07:36 --> 00:07:44 | that function or feature for treating you. It's up to you to get it, but this |
| 49 | 00:07:44 --> 00:07:50 | is what I'm teaching my son to work with. So you can apply this to something |
| 50 | 00:07:50 --> 00:07:54 | like, if you were looking at a one hour chart, if you're a little bit larger |
| 51 | 00:07:54 --> 00:07:59 | term trader in terms of the time frames, like you want to have a little bit |
| 52 | 00:07:59 --> 00:08:05 | higher Time Frame because you believe foolishly, but it's okay. I understand, |
| 53 | 00:08:05 --> 00:08:08 | but you think that these lower time frames are moving faster, and they're |
| 54 | 00:08:08 --> 00:08:12 | not. They're not moving any faster than any other time frame. But if you'd like |
| 55 | 00:08:12 --> 00:08:18 | to look for setups like, say, on an hourly chart, think of it as one. My one |
| 56 | 00:08:18 --> 00:08:26 | minute is your hourly chart. Okay? And then you can use something like a 15 |
| 57 | 00:08:26 --> 00:08:31 | minute time frame or five minute chart to get into a move that you may have |
| 58 | 00:08:31 --> 00:08:35 | missed on the hourly or say you're you're panning through and you see |
| 59 | 00:08:35 --> 00:08:38 | something, oh, wow, I didn't see that set up there. I wish I would have saw |
| 60 | 00:08:38 --> 00:08:45 | that, but it's now starting the mood. Now we're trading into first presented |
| 61 | 00:08:45 --> 00:08:47 | fair value. Got here. |
| 62 | 00:08:59 --> 00:09:05 | I really want to work inside of the out the 10 o'clock hour for silver bullet. I |
| 63 | 00:09:05 --> 00:09:14 | want to use that information during that hour, but I'll wait till 950, 1010, |
| 64 | 00:09:14 --> 00:09:23 | macro, so I'm purposely sitting still if the trade sets up, you know, I'm gonna |
| 65 | 00:09:23 --> 00:09:29 | let it go, and then I'm gonna try to use the logic I'm trying to convey to Caleb |
| 66 | 00:09:29 --> 00:09:33 | and all of you willing to listen, is how to get into a move that's already |
| 67 | 00:09:33 --> 00:09:47 | happened to Start, or move which, in my opinion, is valuable. Skill set. No. |
| 68 | 00:09:47 --> 00:09:54 | Daniel, not drinking from the Yeti, sorry. All right. So here we have this |
| 69 | 00:09:54 --> 00:09:57 | candlesticks high. You're going to look at the value up here, upper right hand |
| 70 | 00:09:57 --> 00:10:11 | corner chart. So the high value. On this candlestick is where we at 19,007 93 and |
| 71 | 00:10:11 --> 00:10:20 | a half. We have yet to trade to number three candles high, which is 90,007 95 |
| 72 | 00:10:20 --> 00:10:26 | even. And this one, I think, is probably the same price as that. Yeah, same |
| 73 | 00:10:26 --> 00:10:36 | highs. So we have to trade to technically 790, 4.75 we have not traded |
| 74 | 00:10:36 --> 00:10:44 | there yet. We have not traded there yet. That's using my model. That's how I |
| 75 | 00:10:44 --> 00:10:50 | would try to enter. If I'm aggressively trying to get into a trade, I have a |
| 76 | 00:10:50 --> 00:10:54 | bias that would be bears. All I'm doing is giving you a reminder that we're |
| 77 | 00:10:54 --> 00:11:00 | looking at mid gap down here. I And |
| 78 | 00:11:06 --> 00:11:12 | let's do this change there. So I'll check my |
| 79 | 00:11:17 --> 00:11:22 | Yeah, I'm good. So settlement, previous settlement opening price. Here's your |
| 80 | 00:11:22 --> 00:11:30 | opening range gap, and then we'll braid it real quick, drop in the FIB one. So |
| 81 | 00:11:30 --> 00:11:34 | then we have our upper quadrant we've already traded to. That's this right |
| 82 | 00:11:34 --> 00:11:40 | here, and all the other time frames. And now go back to electronic trading hours. |
| 83 | 00:11:43 --> 00:11:51 | My advice to Caleb is that if he's going to trade the day before FOMC, he needs |
| 84 | 00:11:51 --> 00:11:55 | to do it in the morning session, which is fine, because that's his model. He |
| 85 | 00:11:55 --> 00:12:05 | won't be trading the afternoons. I'd like to see this here jump up into that, |
| 86 | 00:12:06 --> 00:12:07 | that fair value got there. I |
| 87 | 00:12:28 --> 00:12:34 | the reason why I would encourage him to stay away from FOMC days is because he |
| 88 | 00:12:35 --> 00:12:39 | doesn't have the experience, and most of you probably don't have the experience, |
| 89 | 00:12:39 --> 00:12:45 | if we're being honest, I to not get excited about what you think you see in |
| 90 | 00:12:45 --> 00:12:51 | the charts, because that day is very manipulated. And even after the fact, |
| 91 | 00:12:51 --> 00:12:58 | okay, like it's a two stage delivery, 2pm tomorrow, the market's going to go |
| 92 | 00:12:58 --> 00:13:02 | one direction. It's going to shoot either higher or lower. You don't know |
| 93 | 00:13:02 --> 00:13:04 | which one they're going to do first. I don't know which one they're going to do |
| 94 | 00:13:04 --> 00:13:12 | first. It's heavily manipulated in that 230 during the conference call. Pals a |
| 95 | 00:13:12 --> 00:13:20 | little bit like me, he likes to talk a lot, so sometimes that 230 counter run. |
| 96 | 00:13:20 --> 00:13:24 | So whatever usually happens at two o'clock 230 usually runs right over top |
| 97 | 00:13:24 --> 00:13:27 | of that and goes the other direction. It's, it's usually not all the time, but |
| 98 | 00:13:27 --> 00:13:30 | that's usually what happens, kind of like a Non Farm Payroll event. It's the |
| 99 | 00:13:30 --> 00:13:36 | same thing, but it's a little bit more exaggerated. And if you're wrong, or if |
| 100 | 00:13:36 --> 00:13:42 | you're over leveraged, you're you're probably going to regret that. And I |
| 101 | 00:13:42 --> 00:13:46 | just want to include that in his early development stage, just to avoid the day |
| 102 | 00:13:46 --> 00:13:49 | entirely. That way he can't be enticed to do anything. You can't feel any kind |
| 103 | 00:13:49 --> 00:13:50 | of regret. |
| 104 | 00:13:57 --> 00:14:04 | So what I was looking for is a run, because we had this low and then this |
| 105 | 00:14:04 --> 00:14:08 | low here, trading down into the upper quadrant of the opening range gap. That |
| 106 | 00:14:09 --> 00:14:12 | means the difference between 930s opening price, the very first tick, |
| 107 | 00:14:12 --> 00:14:18 | opening print, today's trading and yesterday's settlement price, when the |
| 108 | 00:14:18 --> 00:14:26 | market technically settles at 415 since there's no trading at 415 it's 414 is |
| 109 | 00:14:26 --> 00:14:30 | the last print. So that's what you're looking for in your lower time frames. |
| 110 | 00:14:30 --> 00:14:36 | So between those two times, that's what makes up the opening range gap. Opening |
| 111 | 00:14:36 --> 00:14:47 | range is a 30 minute time interval, so up to 10 o'clock, and that's here, so we |
| 112 | 00:14:47 --> 00:14:58 | still have some time there. You want to keep your expectations kind of light, |
| 113 | 00:14:58 --> 00:15:07 | also the day before f1 See, it kind of goes without question that you would |
| 114 | 00:15:07 --> 00:15:10 | anyone really want to go out there knowing that there's going to be such a |
| 115 | 00:15:10 --> 00:15:14 | volatile delivery and price, like it's going to go all over the place tomorrow. |
| 116 | 00:15:14 --> 00:15:21 | So if you believe in the adage of buying and selling pressure. Who, in their |
| 117 | 00:15:21 --> 00:15:27 | right mind would be trying to position ahead large positions? Why would they |
| 118 | 00:15:27 --> 00:15:32 | want to get into the marketplace ahead of something like tomorrow's FOMC rate |
| 119 | 00:15:32 --> 00:15:36 | announcement? Like, why? Why would you want to do that? Why would they incur, |
| 120 | 00:15:36 --> 00:15:46 | you know, unnecessary risk? They wouldn't alright. So there's the first |
| 121 | 00:15:46 --> 00:15:53 | presented fair value gap, and I was explaining it off with the basis of this |
| 122 | 00:15:53 --> 00:15:59 | low falling short of the upper quadrant level of the opening range gap. And then |
| 123 | 00:15:59 --> 00:16:03 | it trades down to that sweeps that low, but it trades to the upper quadrant |
| 124 | 00:16:03 --> 00:16:07 | level. And then we created this little, tiny, little fair value see that in the |
| 125 | 00:16:07 --> 00:16:11 | lower left hand, which our lower right hand corner chart, when we were trading, |
| 126 | 00:16:11 --> 00:16:14 | I said, I want to see it trade up in that fair value gap. This is kind of |
| 127 | 00:16:14 --> 00:16:17 | like what I was hoping like trades by Matt guy would would try to trade like |
| 128 | 00:16:17 --> 00:16:21 | that, because what he's aiming for, that's basically it. That's his whole |
| 129 | 00:16:21 --> 00:16:25 | day. He's just sitting like that, and boom. I mean, it probably wouldn't be |
| 130 | 00:16:25 --> 00:16:30 | good for business, for his live streams. He'd be in there now, okay, guys, see |
| 131 | 00:16:30 --> 00:16:33 | you later in the OR, let's just talk about whatever, which is cool. I mean, I |
| 132 | 00:16:33 --> 00:16:41 | love him. I think he's a a nice guy, no drama, The NASDAQ cowboy. I love his |
| 133 | 00:16:41 --> 00:16:47 | song, like I listen to it. Sometimes I'm driving, I'm turning on this. Like, |
| 134 | 00:16:47 --> 00:16:49 | that's actually a catchy little jingle. |
| 135 | 00:16:57 --> 00:17:00 | But you'll see on a 15 second chart, if you can find one minute, five minute, |
| 136 | 00:17:01 --> 00:17:05 | buy, sell, liquidity. And you want to write this part down, because, like I |
| 137 | 00:17:05 --> 00:17:12 | said, I'm going to be waiting until we get into either the deeper half of the |
| 138 | 00:17:12 --> 00:17:19 | 950 to 1010, macro, before I look for anything, or after 10 o'clock. But we're |
| 139 | 00:17:19 --> 00:17:23 | going to wrap it up at 1030 this morning. So that way it's a little bit |
| 140 | 00:17:23 --> 00:17:27 | shorter. And I want to kind of keep to that. I know I say that, but I have to |
| 141 | 00:17:27 --> 00:17:31 | force myself to do it, because Caleb can't. He can't keep up with with this |
| 142 | 00:17:31 --> 00:17:36 | while he's working his job. So, but if you in your notes, you want to write |
| 143 | 00:17:36 --> 00:17:42 | down for fair value, you got trading. You can do high frequency trading, and |
| 144 | 00:17:42 --> 00:17:46 | it's not complicated. It's extremely easy. You can do it without a bias, and |
| 145 | 00:17:47 --> 00:17:52 | the only thing you're doing is looking for relative equal highs on a five or |
| 146 | 00:17:52 --> 00:17:57 | one minute chart, once you map them out in close proximity to where we're at |
| 147 | 00:17:57 --> 00:18:03 | right now. So what would that look like? What you would have. We're going to use |
| 148 | 00:18:03 --> 00:18:06 | the one minute chart. Okay, I'm going to maximize this for a moment. |
| 149 | 00:18:22 --> 00:18:34 | And yeah, I'm ruining it for you. He's here's a guy on Instagram that has a |
| 150 | 00:18:34 --> 00:18:39 | large, I don't know, I don't know if the followers are bots or what, but he has |
| 151 | 00:18:40 --> 00:18:43 | my name, like he's pretending to be me. I'm not on Instagram at all. I'd |
| 152 | 00:18:43 --> 00:18:47 | appreciate if you guys reported it. It's like a 200,000 follower account that's |
| 153 | 00:18:47 --> 00:18:54 | not me, and he links my youtube channel like, like I would if it was me. So I'm |
| 154 | 00:18:54 --> 00:18:57 | hoping that when people go there, they click on that link and they watch videos |
| 155 | 00:18:57 --> 00:19:02 | like this, where I say, I'm not on Instagram. 2024 1024, |
| 156 | 00:19:14 --> 00:19:15 | and then we'll do it in black. And |
| 157 | 00:19:26 --> 00:19:29 | it giddy up. It doesn't |
| 158 | 00:19:40 --> 00:19:41 | really work, well, does it |
| 159 | 00:19:59 --> 00:20:07 | have. That's about saying about wanting to wait, waiting for a little bit more |
| 160 | 00:20:07 --> 00:20:14 | time based delivery, if you're expecting this, just to go up there and fill like |
| 161 | 00:20:15 --> 00:20:23 | I would do if I was aggressive, and it wasn't a day ahead of FOMC, getting in |
| 162 | 00:20:23 --> 00:20:27 | that entry price there, you would have to endure this. And when you know what |
| 163 | 00:20:27 --> 00:20:30 | you're doing and you understand the characteristics, you know what is going |
| 164 | 00:20:30 --> 00:20:35 | to happen, you know the likelihood that a fair value gap, a PD array, it might |
| 165 | 00:20:36 --> 00:20:40 | work through them. And that's not failure for the sake of the methodology. |
| 166 | 00:20:40 --> 00:20:44 | It just means that it's going to color outside the lines and get a little |
| 167 | 00:20:44 --> 00:20:52 | animated. And you can see that happening here, cell side here I'm |
| 168 | 00:21:33 --> 00:21:42 | so that would be like a high frequency run to short term either five or one |
| 169 | 00:21:42 --> 00:21:44 | minute, buy side or sell side. Liquidity, |
| 170 | 00:21:49 --> 00:21:57 | using no bias, just zero bias, just looking for a price run that takes out |
| 171 | 00:21:57 --> 00:22:01 | short term high, short term lows. And you can do that all day long and not |
| 172 | 00:22:01 --> 00:22:07 | even have a not even have a bias. Or the daily session, I'm sorry, with the daily |
| 173 | 00:22:07 --> 00:22:11 | candle or the session you're trading being like the New York session, the |
| 174 | 00:22:11 --> 00:22:15 | morning session or the afternoon session, or if you're trading in the |
| 175 | 00:22:15 --> 00:22:19 | lunch hour, and you can use the same thing like you don't have to be in here |
| 176 | 00:22:20 --> 00:22:25 | sitting still and only trading on a higher timeframe bias. That's that's not |
| 177 | 00:22:25 --> 00:22:32 | required. But you know, when you're first learning it helps, it gives a |
| 178 | 00:22:32 --> 00:22:38 | framework. So now what I'm doing is I'm watching the this wick here, upper right |
| 179 | 00:22:38 --> 00:22:47 | hand corner chart. I'm looking at this wick right there. I'm looking at the |
| 180 | 00:22:47 --> 00:22:50 | 765, and a quarter level, |
| 181 | 00:22:57 --> 00:23:00 | because we traded up into first presented fear of a gap there. I know |
| 182 | 00:23:00 --> 00:23:02 | some of you are probably Short right now. |
| 183 | 00:23:19 --> 00:23:27 | This is the mid gap level down here. Let's do this. |
| 184 | 00:23:42 --> 00:23:50 | I'm so mid gaps here and 10 o'clock here. So we'll see if we can get that |
| 185 | 00:23:51 --> 00:23:54 | mid gap delivery by 10 o'clock. |
| 186 | 00:24:02 --> 00:24:48 | I messing it all up for you guys out there wanting to make copies of these |
| 187 | 00:24:48 --> 00:24:51 | things, put them on YouTube channel, and I push a button to get them taken |
| 188 | 00:24:59 --> 00:25:07 | down. I. So you can think, think to yourself for a second, okay, there are |
| 189 | 00:25:07 --> 00:25:10 | mornings where you'll get in, where you'll watch the price. There's the |
| 190 | 00:25:10 --> 00:25:19 | delivery to make up. So 70% strike rate true today. And now we have the lower |
| 191 | 00:25:19 --> 00:25:29 | quadrant level here at 694 and a half, so be our next downside objective. |
| 192 | 00:25:38 --> 00:25:45 | These for the folks that make these overlays, then I don't want to call them |
| 193 | 00:25:45 --> 00:25:49 | an indicator, because they're not really, not really doing anything like |
| 194 | 00:25:50 --> 00:25:54 | except for reporting previous price points. They're not like, they're not |
| 195 | 00:25:54 --> 00:26:01 | manipulating the data. All they're doing is plotting it. That's why I said |
| 196 | 00:26:04 --> 00:26:09 | indicator slash overlay. Overlays are a more appropriate term for it, because if |
| 197 | 00:26:10 --> 00:26:14 | you're doing anything to manipulate the data at all, it's not something I would |
| 198 | 00:26:14 --> 00:26:19 | do. So I don't trade with indicators. But if you are making these, or if |
| 199 | 00:26:19 --> 00:26:22 | you're the author of this one, and I'll show you which one this is, so you'll |
| 200 | 00:26:22 --> 00:26:29 | recognize it right away. This person here. You want these a little bit |
| 201 | 00:26:29 --> 00:26:33 | further away from price. This is too it's too close. It's very distracting |
| 202 | 00:26:33 --> 00:26:38 | for me. So I don't know if it, if it's a both or something for anyone else, but |
| 203 | 00:26:39 --> 00:26:44 | you need to have it in a way. I would prefer having it set up the same way. A |
| 204 | 00:26:47 --> 00:26:52 | this thing here the ray. Whenever you put that on your chart, it's always |
| 205 | 00:26:52 --> 00:26:56 | going to if you put the annotation to the middle and on the right, it'll |
| 206 | 00:26:56 --> 00:26:59 | always be on the right side of your chart, always at the first extreme. |
| 207 | 00:26:59 --> 00:27:02 | That's how it should be. It should always be like that. And then you'd have |
| 208 | 00:27:03 --> 00:27:07 | the the luxury of moving the chart around with the price to bring it closer |
| 209 | 00:27:07 --> 00:27:12 | to the annotation these. I don't know if you can do that in Pine script, but the |
| 210 | 00:27:12 --> 00:27:19 | that, that's my opinion, that's how it should be. Okay. So we worked, we worked |
| 211 | 00:27:19 --> 00:27:26 | lower. Got close to lower quadrant, but the small, little gap here on the 15 |
| 212 | 00:27:26 --> 00:27:32 | second chart, and then now we're back in the high of that new, new week, opening |
| 213 | 00:27:32 --> 00:27:38 | gap. I was tempted to go in here today completely naked on the charts and have |
| 214 | 00:27:38 --> 00:27:46 | nothing on here, but it's pounding me today, so I would feel the impulse to |
| 215 | 00:27:46 --> 00:27:52 | just try to put more stuff on the chart myself, and I want to do it so we have a |
| 216 | 00:27:52 --> 00:28:01 | couple more minutes before 10 o'clock. We have a short term high here with a |
| 217 | 00:28:01 --> 00:28:03 | civic sell side, imbalanced by side and efficiency. |
| 218 | 00:28:14 --> 00:28:25 | So so far, keeping with the logic we can let trades go. In other words, you can |
| 219 | 00:28:25 --> 00:28:31 | see them coming. You see them formed, set up all that business first presented |
| 220 | 00:28:31 --> 00:28:40 | fair value gap here, 933 so I made this mistake yesterday, and I talked about |
| 221 | 00:28:40 --> 00:28:46 | how one of the candlesticks I pointed to was in the correct time, and it it's |
| 222 | 00:28:46 --> 00:28:49 | because I'm talking live over the chart, and I have so many things I want to talk |
| 223 | 00:28:49 --> 00:28:53 | while the one minute chart was booking price. So I'm constantly getting |
| 224 | 00:28:53 --> 00:28:58 | information from what price is dealing and I'm trying to imitate and talk and |
| 225 | 00:28:58 --> 00:29:01 | give you answer questions I know that's going to come up by based on whatever |
| 226 | 00:29:01 --> 00:29:07 | I'm just said moments ago, and also keeping in line with what I present for |
| 227 | 00:29:07 --> 00:29:14 | that, that lecture. So it's fine that, you know, I made the mistake of calling |
| 228 | 00:29:14 --> 00:29:17 | it the initial fair value gap, where first president present the fair value |
| 229 | 00:29:17 --> 00:29:23 | gap, but it doesn't change anything. It's not like it would have caused a |
| 230 | 00:29:23 --> 00:29:26 | losing trade or something like that. But I did make the mistake, and I corrected |
| 231 | 00:29:26 --> 00:29:34 | myself in the stream. I had probably 900 comments on yesterday's stream. Not you |
| 232 | 00:29:34 --> 00:29:39 | could leave comments on that stream, but on other posts on my YouTube channel, |
| 233 | 00:29:39 --> 00:29:42 | where they were they could leave a comment. They were saying it. Everybody |
| 234 | 00:29:42 --> 00:29:53 | likes to correct me. The the first present, if everybody got here, is |
| 235 | 00:29:53 --> 00:29:59 | obviously this candle here. That's candle stick number two. So to get Sure. |
| 236 | 00:30:00 --> 00:30:06 | I told you I wanted to see the move start like I'm letting it go. I told you |
| 237 | 00:30:06 --> 00:30:13 | that this price here would have to trade to 794 point you're watching this price |
| 238 | 00:30:13 --> 00:30:19 | up here the high to use my entry technique, it would have been shorting |
| 239 | 00:30:19 --> 00:30:28 | as it slammed into 19,007 94.75 you may elect to trade a seldom order. That's |
| 240 | 00:30:28 --> 00:30:35 | what that would be at that price, 795, or higher, you could try to get the |
| 241 | 00:30:35 --> 00:30:39 | consequent encouragement, but it might not go there. You can try to get the |
| 242 | 00:30:39 --> 00:30:44 | lower quadrant. That's probably a good price to reach for. Or if you're really, |
| 243 | 00:30:45 --> 00:30:52 | I guess greedy, you can go in there and try to get the upper portion of of this |
| 244 | 00:30:52 --> 00:31:02 | gap. You can see, we just created a mohawk, so you can anticipate when the |
| 245 | 00:31:02 --> 00:31:06 | market will color outside the PD arrays. You see these jokers out there? I'll |
| 246 | 00:31:06 --> 00:31:10 | say, Look, you know, you're seeing your your PD arrays getting run through. |
| 247 | 00:31:10 --> 00:31:14 | That's part of what you're doing. You're watching how it interprets that. How |
| 248 | 00:31:14 --> 00:31:20 | does it deliver around it kind of like if, if you're looking for a you running. |
| 249 | 00:31:26 --> 00:31:36 | I'm running a little bit slower today. Be it's like a faint, okay, like, like a |
| 250 | 00:31:36 --> 00:31:43 | boxer might act like he's gonna throw a certain punch and or a pitcher, you |
| 251 | 00:31:43 --> 00:31:46 | know, they throw a certain kind of pitch that makes the batter think, okay, it's |
| 252 | 00:31:46 --> 00:31:50 | coming right there, and then it just drops down, okay? Or it curves. It's |
| 253 | 00:31:50 --> 00:31:54 | got, yeah, that's basically the, what I'm saying is the I will allow the |
| 254 | 00:31:54 --> 00:31:58 | market to throw a curveball, and my PD arrays will get colored outside the |
| 255 | 00:31:58 --> 00:32:06 | lines, the Mohawk here, going above that fair value gap. Ideally, it stays inside |
| 256 | 00:32:06 --> 00:32:10 | of it. And many times, when we don't have these environments, which is the |
| 257 | 00:32:10 --> 00:32:16 | day before FOMC, that means it can be a little bit more careless in terms of its |
| 258 | 00:32:16 --> 00:32:21 | precision. It can be a little bit muddier in the water, so you won't see |
| 259 | 00:32:21 --> 00:32:29 | really crisp delivery of price action. So if that's what is likely occur, why |
| 260 | 00:32:30 --> 00:32:35 | would you want to use your lowest entry threshold watch and see how it trades up |
| 261 | 00:32:35 --> 00:32:41 | into the fair value gap, and be more selective, and in my opinion, allow it |
| 262 | 00:32:41 --> 00:32:46 | to first run to the extreme of it, because it might want to do that, and |
| 263 | 00:32:46 --> 00:32:51 | then once it creates the Mohawk, you can trade inside that wick that created |
| 264 | 00:32:51 --> 00:32:56 | that, and you'll get really good premium pricing and trade down to the mid gap, |
| 265 | 00:32:56 --> 00:32:59 | because that's always in the first 30 minutes. That's your bias. If you're |
| 266 | 00:32:59 --> 00:33:04 | going to ask me, What's the bias? ICT, well, there it is. See how, see how hard |
| 267 | 00:33:04 --> 00:33:08 | that can be for you. You have to go and pull up a fib and drop it over the |
| 268 | 00:33:08 --> 00:33:12 | opening price of today at 930 anchored to yesterday's selling price on river |
| 269 | 00:33:12 --> 00:33:19 | trading hours. And then the midpoint on the FIB, that is your 70% bias for the |
| 270 | 00:33:19 --> 00:33:25 | first 30 minutes. Like that is so mechanical, it's so easy, like, how hard |
| 271 | 00:33:25 --> 00:33:28 | is that it's not hard, but you're out here trying to figure out, you know, |
| 272 | 00:33:28 --> 00:33:33 | what, what videos to watch, you know, where do I start? This is, this is the |
| 273 | 00:33:33 --> 00:33:36 | series you start with. This one. This is the one that puts people right in the |
| 274 | 00:33:36 --> 00:33:41 | charts. And here's the setups every single day. It's the same repeating |
| 275 | 00:33:41 --> 00:33:46 | logic. We gap open higher? Is it more than 40 handles? Okay, then you have a |
| 276 | 00:33:46 --> 00:33:52 | respectable opening gap. That means then you can do what you can anticipate the |
| 277 | 00:33:52 --> 00:33:59 | market creating a 70% strike rate of returning back to the half gap. So why |
| 278 | 00:33:59 --> 00:34:04 | are you complicating it? I'm not complicating it. You you pick the first |
| 279 | 00:34:04 --> 00:34:10 | fair value gap that forms at 931 that's the earliest in terms of time, between |
| 280 | 00:34:10 --> 00:34:14 | 931 and 10 o'clock in the morning, the very first fair value gap that forms. |
| 281 | 00:34:15 --> 00:34:19 | And how do you use that first very fair value gap? Okay, I can see that. But |
| 282 | 00:34:19 --> 00:34:24 | what do you do? What does this tell you about the opening range? Gap, mid gap, |
| 283 | 00:34:24 --> 00:34:28 | if it, if it's below the first fair value gap, price, which is this |
| 284 | 00:34:28 --> 00:34:32 | candlestick here? Doesn't that mean the bias for the first 30 minutes should be |
| 285 | 00:34:32 --> 00:34:38 | what bearish is it not delivering it? And you're and you're, you're trying to |
| 286 | 00:34:38 --> 00:34:43 | argue with me that what I'm teaching is complicated. It's absolutely not. You're |
| 287 | 00:34:43 --> 00:34:47 | just not listening to the long, drawn out things where I'm explaining why it's |
| 288 | 00:34:47 --> 00:34:52 | best to understand every facet to it, and you curse me and you cuss me out and |
| 289 | 00:34:52 --> 00:34:56 | talk all this nonsense in comment sections of my videos, or even on my |
| 290 | 00:34:56 --> 00:35:00 | social media or other people's social media, saying that the stuff. Doesn't |
| 291 | 00:35:00 --> 00:35:04 | work. Well, find this stuff and anybody else's stuff. Find the first presented |
| 292 | 00:35:04 --> 00:35:08 | fair value gap. Find the fact that it's going to go to mid gap 7% of the time. |
| 293 | 00:35:08 --> 00:35:11 | In the first 30 minutes you got, you have an entire trading model right |
| 294 | 00:35:11 --> 00:35:17 | there, and you're done. In 30 minutes, you're done. I mean, I don't know, what |
| 295 | 00:35:17 --> 00:35:23 | else would you want? I don't know. I mean, I know I would want more because |
| 296 | 00:35:23 --> 00:35:29 | I'm, I'm that type of guy, but you don't need more than to quit your job. I mean, |
| 297 | 00:35:29 --> 00:35:35 | you can do this over time and make more than your your paycheck gives you. It |
| 298 | 00:35:35 --> 00:35:41 | completely strips away the ambiguity of where's the bias, what trade directions |
| 299 | 00:35:41 --> 00:35:46 | I trade in and Now contrast that with people that will tell you what you're |
| 300 | 00:35:46 --> 00:35:52 | learning isn't real, where there's no real logic to it. I'm going to take this |
| 301 | 00:35:52 --> 00:35:56 | little box off now, because it's actually not that I like to keep these |
| 302 | 00:35:56 --> 00:36:09 | dudes from looking smart by having my stuff up. Pretend it's them the let's |
| 303 | 00:36:09 --> 00:36:16 | maximize that one minute chart. So your stop would be above this candlestick |
| 304 | 00:36:16 --> 00:36:21 | here. So anything you're shorting in here, you're stopped above this camel. |
| 305 | 00:36:23 --> 00:36:26 | So yeah, we wicked above the fair value gap, but that doesn't do anything to |
| 306 | 00:36:26 --> 00:36:30 | upset the trade. So if you know that it's going to be a day that has |
| 307 | 00:36:30 --> 00:36:33 | characteristics that allows and affords the market to be a little bit more |
| 308 | 00:36:33 --> 00:36:38 | muddier, where it colors Outside the Lines, how do we know that? How can we |
| 309 | 00:36:38 --> 00:36:44 | anticipate that? Because tomorrow's FOMC in the morning or day before, can tend |
| 310 | 00:36:44 --> 00:36:49 | to be a little bit more reckless and more wild. The price can be a little bit |
| 311 | 00:36:49 --> 00:36:58 | more disorganized, basically, and shorting in this first fair value gap, |
| 312 | 00:36:58 --> 00:37:05 | the gap itself formed at 9:33am, candle number two is where your stop is going |
| 313 | 00:37:05 --> 00:37:10 | to go, whether you're going long or short. So think like an algorithm. Okay, |
| 314 | 00:37:11 --> 00:37:15 | an algorithm is just the recipe. So here's the here's the recipe. This is |
| 315 | 00:37:15 --> 00:37:21 | the this is your Blue Ribbon recipe from ICT, where all you have to do is follow |
| 316 | 00:37:21 --> 00:37:25 | this logic every single day. You're not going to get a winning trade every |
| 317 | 00:37:25 --> 00:37:29 | single day, but I promise you, if you study it, go back and back, test it, |
| 318 | 00:37:29 --> 00:37:32 | you're going to see an enormous advantage in how you could have been |
| 319 | 00:37:32 --> 00:37:36 | making a whole lot more consistent moves, passing your funded accounts, |
| 320 | 00:37:36 --> 00:37:40 | getting funded, getting withdrawals, getting all that stuff, getting real |
| 321 | 00:37:41 --> 00:37:45 | money, turning your demo account that you're trading with these funded account |
| 322 | 00:37:45 --> 00:37:52 | companies into money making machines. The recipe or algorithm is this every |
| 323 | 00:37:52 --> 00:37:58 | day at nine o'clock Eastern Standard Time, you're sitting down and you're |
| 324 | 00:37:58 --> 00:38:02 | opening up the NASDAQ, or you're going to open up the ES, it's the same thing. |
| 325 | 00:38:02 --> 00:38:05 | You're not making anything different here. It's just the same process. If you |
| 326 | 00:38:05 --> 00:38:09 | want to trade the Dow, I don't know why you would want to trade a Dirty 30. I |
| 327 | 00:38:09 --> 00:38:13 | can't stand it. It's too spotty. I don't like it. But if that's your cup of tea, |
| 328 | 00:38:13 --> 00:38:17 | just know that you're probably going to have a little bit more adversity in that |
| 329 | 00:38:17 --> 00:38:23 | one, because it does a whole lot of it creates a lot more wicks, and it usually |
| 330 | 00:38:23 --> 00:38:29 | will move faster or before the other indices, because it's more responsive, |
| 331 | 00:38:29 --> 00:38:33 | because there's only 30 issues in it that make up that index, whereas the S P |
| 332 | 00:38:33 --> 00:38:41 | has 500 companies and the Nasdaq has 100 so because of that, that's Why the S P |
| 333 | 00:38:41 --> 00:38:46 | is a little bit smoother, because it's factoring a composite of 500 individual |
| 334 | 00:38:46 --> 00:38:51 | companies price fluctuations and changes, versus the NASDAQ, which is a |
| 335 | 00:38:51 --> 00:38:55 | composite index of 100 stocks, and then you have the least which is the Dow, |
| 336 | 00:38:55 --> 00:39:02 | which owns only 30 stocks. So out of those 30 stocks, it can be influenced |
| 337 | 00:39:02 --> 00:39:07 | greatly by the price movement of larger stocks in that list of 30, so it's a |
| 338 | 00:39:07 --> 00:39:11 | little bit skewed, and that's why I don't like it. So that answers a lot of |
| 339 | 00:39:11 --> 00:39:15 | questions about the Dow and why don't trade it? Can I trade it? Yes. Does my |
| 340 | 00:39:15 --> 00:39:23 | stuff work in it? Yes, but I'm not trading it, so I I will use the Dow for |
| 341 | 00:39:23 --> 00:39:29 | a like a SMT divergence early warning. But it's not that. It's not the deciding |
| 342 | 00:39:29 --> 00:39:35 | factor. I'd prefer to see an SMT divergence between ES and NASDAQ. So if |
| 343 | 00:39:35 --> 00:39:43 | I'm bearish, I want to see, I want to see like, since I'm actively trading the |
| 344 | 00:39:43 --> 00:39:49 | NASDAQ, I would look at the E, Mini, s, p, by comparison. And we are in the |
| 345 | 00:39:49 --> 00:39:55 | December contract. We're not looking at the the September contract anymore. Do |
| 346 | 00:39:55 --> 00:40:03 | you see the s and t divergence? I. I don't worry about price. I got I got |
| 347 | 00:40:03 --> 00:40:06 | another I got another entry. Don't worry. I'm purposely letting things move |
| 348 | 00:40:06 --> 00:40:13 | around the these highs here, this high went higher than that. One didn't it. |
| 349 | 00:40:13 --> 00:40:25 | Now I'm look at it here with the NASDAQ. See it now? By comparison, this looks a |
| 350 | 00:40:25 --> 00:40:30 | whole lot more animated, doesn't it? And when there's wicks, I'm looking at the |
| 351 | 00:40:30 --> 00:40:34 | bodies, because that's where the bulk of the volume is. So there'll be times |
| 352 | 00:40:34 --> 00:40:43 | where you'll see that the wicks might be higher, but the bodies aren't inside |
| 353 | 00:40:43 --> 00:40:49 | this swing. Compare that to here. So NASDAQ went higher, both in wicks, |
| 354 | 00:40:49 --> 00:40:59 | comparatively between this highs and here in in ES, I keep wanting to reach |
| 355 | 00:40:59 --> 00:41:05 | for the U for September delivery contract month. You see what's happened |
| 356 | 00:41:05 --> 00:41:12 | here. Y'all thought you knew. SMT. You don't know SMT. |
| 357 | 00:41:14 --> 00:41:19 | Here's the high and the wick went higher. But the what do wicks do? What I |
| 358 | 00:41:19 --> 00:41:24 | teach it, they do the damage. So the this is an SMT divergence, because the |
| 359 | 00:41:24 --> 00:41:29 | bodies in the high here are lower than this. So that's why you gotta stop |
| 360 | 00:41:29 --> 00:41:33 | listening to these dollar menu mentorships, because they're they don't, |
| 361 | 00:41:33 --> 00:41:36 | they don't know everything that I know, and they don't know the full concepts. |
| 362 | 00:41:37 --> 00:41:42 | Like I said, I've only introduced everything, yeah, every single thing is |
| 363 | 00:41:42 --> 00:41:47 | just an introduction. It gives you a platform as a foundation to start |
| 364 | 00:41:47 --> 00:41:51 | understanding it. And you don't need to know everything and do well, but what |
| 365 | 00:41:51 --> 00:41:58 | happens when you really understand it? Yeah, so by comparison, again, you want |
| 366 | 00:41:58 --> 00:42:03 | to do this in your own charts. By the way, don't use mine. You want to use the |
| 367 | 00:42:09 --> 00:42:15 | the time frame right above the executable time frame and the time frame |
| 368 | 00:42:15 --> 00:42:22 | that you intend to trade on meaning, as I mentioned at the beginning of the |
| 369 | 00:42:22 --> 00:42:26 | stream, I said that we're going to be working with a move that's already |
| 370 | 00:42:26 --> 00:42:30 | happened or started. Let's put it that way. And then what happens if you miss |
| 371 | 00:42:30 --> 00:42:34 | that move? Well, you have two choices. You can be regretful and get angry and |
| 372 | 00:42:34 --> 00:42:40 | get emotional and say, Oh man, and then either chase it or the worst is okay, |
| 373 | 00:42:40 --> 00:42:43 | since I missed it, I'm angry. Now I'm going to feed it. I'm going to wait for |
| 374 | 00:42:43 --> 00:42:46 | it to I think it ends now, so now I'm going to trade the other direction, |
| 375 | 00:42:46 --> 00:42:53 | because you, because you want to wrestle the marketplace. You're you're mad at it |
| 376 | 00:42:53 --> 00:42:59 | never good. Now I like the 19,009 I |
| 377 | 00:43:04 --> 00:43:09 | 26 level. That's the equivalent of the September contract. And you can check |
| 378 | 00:43:09 --> 00:43:18 | you can check that out. Look at your hourly chart on the NQ, u2, 024, on |
| 379 | 00:43:20 --> 00:43:26 | trading view. And then look at the the August, 27 through 29th highs. There |
| 380 | 00:43:26 --> 00:43:31 | are, like, four or five of them up there, real smooth, the equivalent for |
| 381 | 00:43:31 --> 00:43:35 | the December contract, which is what we're watching price in right now. That |
| 382 | 00:43:35 --> 00:43:40 | is the same thing here, right? So that's where those relative equal highs are. |
| 383 | 00:43:40 --> 00:43:45 | That's that big pocket of buy side liquidity. If we don't go there today, I |
| 384 | 00:43:45 --> 00:43:53 | think that FOMC tomorrow will target that area. So that's just a very loose |
| 385 | 00:43:54 --> 00:43:58 | expectation. It's not a hard and fast it's going to do it. I'm not betting the |
| 386 | 00:43:58 --> 00:44:03 | farm on it. I'm not trying to position myself ahead. I'm not in any trades |
| 387 | 00:44:03 --> 00:44:07 | right now. I didn't trade last night. I didn't do anything. I just hung out and |
| 388 | 00:44:07 --> 00:44:12 | made a little video presenting great bowls, which is a PD array that I'll |
| 389 | 00:44:12 --> 00:44:19 | talk more about in the book, but it's how you use Wix, okay? And Wix are a PD |
| 390 | 00:44:19 --> 00:44:25 | array that you can look inside of them, in that little gray area of where nobody |
| 391 | 00:44:25 --> 00:44:29 | would really pay that much attention to a cluster of wicks. But the algorithm, |
| 392 | 00:44:29 --> 00:44:33 | because it knows every single high and low and it knows how to refer back to it |
| 393 | 00:44:33 --> 00:44:37 | based on its script, it's going to refer to those wicks in a manner that I |
| 394 | 00:44:37 --> 00:44:45 | outlined, and you can see it so I'm not looking at supply and demand zones. I'm |
| 395 | 00:44:45 --> 00:44:49 | not looking at old highs and old lows for support and resistance. I'm looking |
| 396 | 00:44:49 --> 00:44:57 | at very specific prices, but where those prices reside in the matrix of where |
| 397 | 00:44:57 --> 00:45:01 | price is at the market and if it's going. Go lower, I'm going to be looking |
| 398 | 00:45:01 --> 00:45:04 | for discounted rates. I'm not just looking for inefficiencies like a fair |
| 399 | 00:45:04 --> 00:45:07 | Vega. I'm not looking for relatively cool lows or a single low. I'm looking |
| 400 | 00:45:07 --> 00:45:14 | for clustering of wicks because nobody's paying attention to them. No one's no |
| 401 | 00:45:14 --> 00:45:19 | one's making any effort to to see what was the purpose of that flurry of price |
| 402 | 00:45:19 --> 00:45:23 | action, redelivering multiple times in that area where you have multiple wicks |
| 403 | 00:45:23 --> 00:45:30 | overlapping, right? You think the algorithm, you know, if, if, if you can |
| 404 | 00:45:30 --> 00:45:36 | just give me the the stage for a second, assume for a moment, if you don't |
| 405 | 00:45:36 --> 00:45:39 | believe there's an algorithm that controls price and it delivers price and |
| 406 | 00:45:39 --> 00:45:45 | it's a price engine. If you don't believe that, pretend for a moment you |
| 407 | 00:45:45 --> 00:45:52 | did. Wouldn't it be logical if there were a algorithm that even that little |
| 408 | 00:45:52 --> 00:45:58 | messy area of a clustering of wicks all different lengths and such, wouldn't it |
| 409 | 00:45:58 --> 00:46:03 | have to still have to work with that information there or otherwise ignore |
| 410 | 00:46:03 --> 00:46:08 | it, and what problems would it create if it was ignoring that? And why would it? |
| 411 | 00:46:08 --> 00:46:13 | Why would it ignore that? What would make what would set the precedence over |
| 412 | 00:46:13 --> 00:46:16 | something else in the marketplace that the algorithm will refer to, versus |
| 413 | 00:46:16 --> 00:46:20 | something like that? But then, when you start seeing it like I'm teaching in the |
| 414 | 00:46:20 --> 00:46:26 | in the future with this, you'll see that you have an x ray view of price. You'll |
| 415 | 00:46:26 --> 00:46:32 | be able to see things that are not technically in your chart. They're not |
| 416 | 00:46:32 --> 00:46:35 | in your chart. Nobody's seeing these things because they're not looking for |
| 417 | 00:46:35 --> 00:46:38 | it. Number one, they haven't they have no knowledge of it. They have no no |
| 418 | 00:46:38 --> 00:46:41 | reason, no there was no inspiration. Now there's going to be all kinds of people |
| 419 | 00:46:41 --> 00:46:45 | creating these bullshit storylines. Okay, that, Oh, this is the thing I've |
| 420 | 00:46:45 --> 00:46:50 | cracked enigma. You don't have any idea what you're talking about, but I'm |
| 421 | 00:46:50 --> 00:46:55 | introducing it kind of like a little bit of a enticement to say there's new stuff |
| 422 | 00:46:55 --> 00:47:01 | coming, there's new stuff coming. And it's extremely precise, very, very |
| 423 | 00:47:01 --> 00:47:08 | precise, and it's time based. It's very specific time based things I don't need |
| 424 | 00:47:08 --> 00:47:13 | to be in here worrying about every single fluctuation. I can set a date, |
| 425 | 00:47:13 --> 00:47:17 | just like when you set a birthday party for your child, or you set a date that |
| 426 | 00:47:17 --> 00:47:21 | you're going to be at a restaurant with your significant other at dinner. Here |
| 427 | 00:47:21 --> 00:47:24 | it is. That's the time we're going to be there eating. That's what I can do with |
| 428 | 00:47:24 --> 00:47:28 | my trading. That's what you can do with your trading. And that is a liberating |
| 429 | 00:47:28 --> 00:47:32 | feeling. Contrast that with everything else, you're waiting for something to |
| 430 | 00:47:32 --> 00:47:38 | appear in a chart, or you're just waiting. You're just waiting. Yeah, keep |
| 431 | 00:47:38 --> 00:47:47 | waiting. So the the idea of moving from one minute buy side and sell side, and |
| 432 | 00:47:47 --> 00:47:54 | then, using a 15 second chart, you can find very, very high frequency trading |
| 433 | 00:47:54 --> 00:48:00 | setups in that you're going to get stopped out more times than anything |
| 434 | 00:48:00 --> 00:48:05 | else I've taught, because you're going to be chasing every potential run into |
| 435 | 00:48:05 --> 00:48:10 | liquidity on a very small time frame, and the times you're going to get caught |
| 436 | 00:48:10 --> 00:48:16 | offside is when you don't refer to the time of day, the day of week, the week |
| 437 | 00:48:16 --> 00:48:19 | of the month, the seasonal tendency where the higher Time Frame, daily Order |
| 438 | 00:48:19 --> 00:48:26 | Flow and weekly order flow is reaching for specifically this. I believe this is |
| 439 | 00:48:26 --> 00:48:32 | where we're going to aim now, because that is a likelihood, and we have big |
| 440 | 00:48:32 --> 00:48:37 | news coming out tomorrow, I would not want to position very large today. I |
| 441 | 00:48:37 --> 00:48:41 | would not want to swing trade today. I think it's more reasonable to see them |
| 442 | 00:48:41 --> 00:48:46 | leave this here. It's just a real easy candy store to rob and just go in there |
| 443 | 00:48:46 --> 00:48:50 | tomorrow and smash it. They can be chopping around and do all kinds of |
| 444 | 00:48:53 --> 00:48:58 | subtle ranging, creating consolidations that many of you would be frustrated by. |
| 445 | 00:48:59 --> 00:49:02 | But when you understand that these are the conditions and characteristics you |
| 446 | 00:49:02 --> 00:49:08 | won't be in here trying to trade larger or more frequent than you should. So |
| 447 | 00:49:08 --> 00:49:12 | while there is a approach to trading high frequency using sub one minute time |
| 448 | 00:49:12 --> 00:49:20 | frames, you can get shit 2030, trades a day easily, and that wouldn't be over |
| 449 | 00:49:20 --> 00:49:24 | trading, using that model like think about that like that in the hands of |
| 450 | 00:49:24 --> 00:49:29 | someone that doesn't know what they're doing, and it's impulsive, and they're |
| 451 | 00:49:29 --> 00:49:34 | over leveraging. You're gonna blow your brains out because you have so many |
| 452 | 00:49:34 --> 00:49:42 | opportunities for you to the mess it up. Basically, I'm trying not to curse the |
| 453 | 00:49:43 --> 00:49:50 | so what happens if you know that this is the likely draw, if you filter out all |
| 454 | 00:49:50 --> 00:49:55 | the high frequency trading that you do, sub one minute, aiming for short term |
| 455 | 00:49:55 --> 00:50:00 | one minute or five minute buy side using a 15 second fair value, got entry. Model |
| 456 | 00:50:01 --> 00:50:06 | you're filtering out all the potential for you to get nailed if they do, in |
| 457 | 00:50:06 --> 00:50:11 | fact, want to run up there and hit that. So you see, it's not just give me the |
| 458 | 00:50:11 --> 00:50:15 | right fair value gap, give me a PD array, give me a straightforward model. |
| 459 | 00:50:15 --> 00:50:21 | I just gave it to you this morning. You're looking for a gap of 40 handles |
| 460 | 00:50:21 --> 00:50:30 | or more, okay, the the larger. Above 40 handles, the better. What was the what |
| 461 | 00:50:30 --> 00:50:40 | was opening range this morning? Previous settlement price at 661, 795, hello. |
| 462 | 00:50:40 --> 00:50:45 | That's over 100 handles. So you are in a jackpot like you have an easy, easy, |
| 463 | 00:50:45 --> 00:50:51 | easy, 70% chance. That's not 100% chance, folks. That's not a guarantee. |
| 464 | 00:50:52 --> 00:50:58 | It's a 70% chance that in the first 30 minutes, you have an ability to sit down |
| 465 | 00:50:58 --> 00:51:00 | know exactly what you're expecting to see in price. What is that you're |
| 466 | 00:51:00 --> 00:51:06 | expecting the price from this opening price here at 930 to gravitate down to |
| 467 | 00:51:06 --> 00:51:10 | half of the gap. You don't need the whole gap to close. There are things |
| 468 | 00:51:10 --> 00:51:15 | that you can trade with that gives that idea. I'll teach a little bit about |
| 469 | 00:51:15 --> 00:51:19 | that. But Why worry about having that when you got something that's |
| 470 | 00:51:19 --> 00:51:23 | statistically probable over 70% of the time. I mean, think about you don't even |
| 471 | 00:51:23 --> 00:51:31 | get it right in your demo account. You know that many times in a month a year, |
| 472 | 00:51:31 --> 00:51:35 | you have very, very low strike rate. And the people that are honest, they come |
| 473 | 00:51:35 --> 00:51:39 | out forward, they'll say, you know, I'm about 50% accurate. And to me, that's |
| 474 | 00:51:39 --> 00:51:45 | offensive, because I'm a numbers guy. I like looking for advantages. I don't |
| 475 | 00:51:45 --> 00:51:48 | want to go out here and just do something that doesn't have an built in |
| 476 | 00:51:48 --> 00:51:53 | advantage. Who would want to do that? People that believe that price is |
| 477 | 00:51:53 --> 00:51:59 | random. So they they submit themselves to okay, what's probably not going to be |
| 478 | 00:51:59 --> 00:52:03 | an easy day, but I'm going to go out here and do something. And if you're a |
| 479 | 00:52:03 --> 00:52:07 | live streamer, it's even worse, because now you feel like you gotta perform. And |
| 480 | 00:52:07 --> 00:52:13 | it's, it's illuminating watching individuals go out there and they just |
| 481 | 00:52:14 --> 00:52:17 | phone it in, they just lob it in and say, Okay, well, you know, there it is. |
| 482 | 00:52:17 --> 00:52:21 | There it is, guys, I did my best. Well, I'm telling you how to make your best |
| 483 | 00:52:21 --> 00:52:27 | better. Opening range, gap, okay, they're never going to hide this from |
| 484 | 00:52:27 --> 00:52:30 | you. They're never going to change it. And it's not going to some it's not |
| 485 | 00:52:30 --> 00:52:36 | going to be something that falls out of favor, okay. Gap opening higher, more |
| 486 | 00:52:36 --> 00:52:39 | than 40 handles. The larger the gap, the better. That means your range is more |
| 487 | 00:52:39 --> 00:52:45 | opportunity. So from the opening price, soon as at 930 opens up, you know what |
| 488 | 00:52:45 --> 00:52:52 | that price is. Everybody else knows what that price is. Down to that gaps |
| 489 | 00:52:52 --> 00:53:03 | midpoint, which is 728.25 so you have essentially, what is that 50 ish |
| 490 | 00:53:03 --> 00:53:04 | handles. |
| 491 | 00:53:05 --> 00:53:14 | Now think about this. What would 50 handles do per week? Not every day, not |
| 492 | 00:53:14 --> 00:53:21 | every day, just one trade per week. You say I'm going to find one setup because |
| 493 | 00:53:21 --> 00:53:26 | I don't know what I'm doing. I want to get consistent. I want to build trust in |
| 494 | 00:53:26 --> 00:53:31 | myself and not be impulsive, but I still want to show progress. And if you're |
| 495 | 00:53:31 --> 00:53:35 | trying to get a funded account, combine past if you can't stick to something |
| 496 | 00:53:35 --> 00:53:39 | like what I'm outlining here, no wonder you're failing. And you shouldn't be |
| 497 | 00:53:39 --> 00:53:43 | paying for them. Don't buy anymore of them till you can build yourself |
| 498 | 00:53:43 --> 00:53:49 | discipline if you're not smiling, and if the gears aren't turning in your head |
| 499 | 00:53:49 --> 00:53:55 | right. Now, how this is so fucking easy, and it's in front of you every single |
| 500 | 00:53:55 --> 00:53:59 | day, and you, I've told I've told you this for weeks now, and it's not every |
| 501 | 00:53:59 --> 00:54:04 | single day. But it's happening enough, even if you did it wrong on the days |
| 502 | 00:54:04 --> 00:54:12 | that it didn't deliver. 50 handles. Is 50 handles. That's $1,000 on one mini, |
| 503 | 00:54:16 --> 00:54:20 | $1,000 what's $1,000 do for you? Once a week, one trade, you're not even |
| 504 | 00:54:20 --> 00:54:29 | worrying about it in 30 minutes. In 30 minutes, that's how long, okay, you have |
| 505 | 00:54:29 --> 00:54:36 | to sit and wait. I'm satisfying every Millennials fucking dream. This is a |
| 506 | 00:54:36 --> 00:54:42 | Millennials wet dream. Tell me what to do, what direction, what's the target, |
| 507 | 00:54:42 --> 00:54:46 | and how long do I have to sit still and wait for it? I've answered all of it. |
| 508 | 00:54:46 --> 00:54:49 | There's nobody else out there has given you something like that. There's no one |
| 509 | 00:54:49 --> 00:54:55 | else doing it like this, baby. It's ridiculous. I got all kinds of stuff |
| 510 | 00:54:55 --> 00:55:00 | like this, but this is easy. Large opening gap, higher. Yeah, wonderful. |
| 511 | 00:55:00 --> 00:55:06 | Find the mid gap. There it is. Find your opening price. That's your range. That's |
| 512 | 00:55:06 --> 00:55:13 | the profit potential. Okay, so now, what do you do? You wait in one minute from |
| 513 | 00:55:13 --> 00:55:17 | the opening price. You can take your time. You got 60 seconds to say, Okay, |
| 514 | 00:55:17 --> 00:55:21 | what's the math on this? Here's my opening price, and in the mid gap prices |
| 515 | 00:55:21 --> 00:55:25 | down here, once you anchor your fib to the between price there's that's your |
| 516 | 00:55:25 --> 00:55:29 | price you're aiming for. That's your range between this price and that one. |
| 517 | 00:55:30 --> 00:55:34 | So you know your bias is what you're going to try to go short. So now what do |
| 518 | 00:55:34 --> 00:55:40 | you wait for? He's going to go short? No, you watch price. You wait for to do |
| 519 | 00:55:40 --> 00:55:46 | what create the first presented fair value gap? This is the first fair value |
| 520 | 00:55:46 --> 00:55:52 | gap. This candle here at 933 so it meets the criteria. It can't be on the 930 |
| 521 | 00:55:53 --> 00:55:58 | candle. 931 is the easiest and first, I'm not easiest. It's the first, |
| 522 | 00:55:58 --> 00:56:02 | earliest candlestick that can create the fair value gap. Candlestick number two, |
| 523 | 00:56:02 --> 00:56:06 | I'm number two, that one that makes the imbalance. This is candlestick number |
| 524 | 00:56:06 --> 00:56:15 | one. This is candlestick number two. Here's candlestick number three. So |
| 525 | 00:56:15 --> 00:56:21 | candlestick number three, your entry is either one tick below, if you're |
| 526 | 00:56:21 --> 00:56:24 | aggressive like me, and you know what, what side of the market you're trying to |
| 527 | 00:56:24 --> 00:56:27 | get in, and you just don't want to miss the move. Because I trust this model, |
| 528 | 00:56:29 --> 00:56:33 | you know I I could trust this. I could be selling short there. And any |
| 529 | 00:56:33 --> 00:56:36 | opportunity, it's inside that gap here, I'm going to short. I will short rate |
| 530 | 00:56:36 --> 00:56:44 | that mohawk, because it stops up here. I uh, above this candle is high. I know |
| 531 | 00:56:44 --> 00:56:48 | this is intrusive, having that laying on top here, but I'm sorry, but people |
| 532 | 00:56:48 --> 00:56:52 | literally take my stuff and they they try to put their own, their own YouTube |
| 533 | 00:56:52 --> 00:56:55 | channel, and it's just real easy for me to push a button, and the copyright is |
| 534 | 00:56:56 --> 00:56:59 | done, and they lose their channel. And I'm not trying to be a jerk about it, |
| 535 | 00:56:59 --> 00:57:03 | but you don't have the right to put my content on your community channels, and |
| 536 | 00:57:03 --> 00:57:07 | I'll give you permission to translate them either. So the and you can hate me |
| 537 | 00:57:07 --> 00:57:12 | for I don't care the number two candle, that's the in the in imbalance, where |
| 538 | 00:57:12 --> 00:57:16 | it's this, number one candle is low and Number three's candle is high. Anywhere |
| 539 | 00:57:16 --> 00:57:27 | in here, go short, stop up here. So this little spike here, they can crack jokes |
| 540 | 00:57:27 --> 00:57:33 | all they want, but I just gave you something they can never deliver. And |
| 541 | 00:57:33 --> 00:57:39 | this is such a good model, it's so it answers everything. When it starts to |
| 542 | 00:57:39 --> 00:57:44 | break down, you find a short term low. Once it breaks that, you put your stop |
| 543 | 00:57:44 --> 00:57:50 | loss to cover costs. If you have more than one contract, you take a partial |
| 544 | 00:57:50 --> 00:57:53 | below the short term low. Everything I'm saying here, when we have a gap lower |
| 545 | 00:57:53 --> 00:57:59 | opening more than 40 handles 50% of the gap is your target. Wait for the first |
| 546 | 00:57:59 --> 00:58:02 | presented fair value gap, and you're going to be using as the as a means to |
| 547 | 00:58:02 --> 00:58:08 | go long and trade up to the half of the guy here, first period, first fair value |
| 548 | 00:58:08 --> 00:58:12 | gap. Here is your entry mechanism to get down to mid gap. And you have a 70% |
| 549 | 00:58:12 --> 00:58:16 | strike rate built in. Got a home field advantage that this is going to happen |
| 550 | 00:58:16 --> 00:58:24 | 70% of the time daily. Now you can further increase that strike rate by |
| 551 | 00:58:24 --> 00:58:32 | understanding economic calendar, hello, and understanding the likelihood of what |
| 552 | 00:58:32 --> 00:58:38 | happens if you take 75 to 8% off of the trade at the mid gap. And you don't have |
| 553 | 00:58:38 --> 00:58:41 | the experience and you want to see if you can go down to close the entire gap. |
| 554 | 00:58:41 --> 00:58:45 | Okay, just put your stop loss somewhere above the short term while you took |
| 555 | 00:58:45 --> 00:58:49 | profit at or partial, and if it stops you out on the balance, who cares? At |
| 556 | 00:58:49 --> 00:58:55 | least you had a free look. You did 80% off here, remaining from the position |
| 557 | 00:58:55 --> 00:58:59 | after you've taken off a partial, or don't do any partials, just expect that |
| 558 | 00:58:59 --> 00:59:07 | it goes below this low and accelerates to mid gap. Look at the bodies. Look how |
| 559 | 00:59:07 --> 00:59:12 | the bodies are, respecting that mid gap level. That's algorithmic. It's doing |
| 560 | 00:59:12 --> 00:59:21 | something that it's been scripted and coded to do, just like a recipe. I want |
| 561 | 00:59:21 --> 00:59:24 | you to think about the potential that I just laid in your hands. I've already |
| 562 | 00:59:24 --> 00:59:30 | taught this a few times in my lectures. I've taught this, but you don't remember |
| 563 | 00:59:30 --> 00:59:35 | it because you're waiting for something where I'm drawing over top the chart and |
| 564 | 00:59:35 --> 00:59:39 | I'm trying to tell you what the market's going to do next. Why worry about what's |
| 565 | 00:59:39 --> 00:59:42 | happening next when I'm telling you how you're going to find what's going to |
| 566 | 00:59:42 --> 00:59:47 | happen next, every day, what's more important to you, the fair value get |
| 567 | 00:59:47 --> 00:59:51 | that I'm going to push a button on today, or having the watch where you |
| 568 | 00:59:51 --> 00:59:54 | don't need to come back to watch my channel. How's that working for ad |
| 569 | 00:59:54 --> 00:59:58 | revenue campaign, I don't want you coming to watch my videos, because if |
| 570 | 00:59:58 --> 01:00:01 | you keep coming back and watching my videos. That means you don't know, you |
| 571 | 01:00:01 --> 01:00:03 | don't know anything. You're still learning, and if you're brand new, |
| 572 | 01:00:04 --> 01:00:08 | that's that's reasonable. But when somebody finds a model like this, why |
| 573 | 01:00:08 --> 01:00:13 | would you want to worry about whatever else I put up? Why would you even want |
| 574 | 01:00:13 --> 01:00:18 | to buy my books? How's that for a sales campaign, I don't need your money. Okay? |
| 575 | 01:00:18 --> 01:00:21 | I'm just presenting it because it's my stuff, and nobody else has the authority |
| 576 | 01:00:21 --> 01:00:25 | or the authority or the understanding be able to do it. And I want to document |
| 577 | 01:00:25 --> 01:00:29 | it, my sons and daughter, they can hear me talk about it. It's not just looking |
| 578 | 01:00:29 --> 01:00:33 | at my notes, looking at my journals, looking at my my things that may not be |
| 579 | 01:00:33 --> 01:00:37 | as a clear depiction or understanding what it is that I'm actually teaching |
| 580 | 01:00:38 --> 01:00:43 | and what I've used. It's my whole entire life's work, and this is not in Al |
| 581 | 01:00:43 --> 01:00:48 | Brooks bullshit. Okay, no, no offense to the guy, but I don't have any connection |
| 582 | 01:00:48 --> 01:00:52 | to any other mentor out there, and Larry Williams wouldn't know anything about |
| 583 | 01:00:52 --> 01:00:55 | this either. Ask him. Don't be rude about it, that guy, I guarantee you |
| 584 | 01:00:55 --> 01:01:03 | he'll say, Yeah, I don't know anything about that. He was my first mentor. I |
| 585 | 01:01:03 --> 01:01:06 | anything that's ever had an influence on me from him, I've always credited. And I |
| 586 | 01:01:06 --> 01:01:10 | told everybody, buy everything he has, and everybody should have that book. How |
| 587 | 01:01:10 --> 01:01:14 | many million dollars shaking commodities last year? It's a 1970s book. And |
| 588 | 01:01:14 --> 01:01:17 | there's a lot of stuff in there that doesn't hold water, in my opinion, but |
| 589 | 01:01:17 --> 01:01:22 | the very specific things in there about premium pricing. That means the front |
| 590 | 01:01:22 --> 01:01:25 | month is more expensive than the distant month. For instance. How would that? |
| 591 | 01:01:25 --> 01:01:31 | What would that mean in terms of trading the S, P or NASDAQ? Right now, the |
| 592 | 01:01:31 --> 01:01:37 | nearby contract is September still and it's going to expire, and then it |
| 593 | 01:01:37 --> 01:01:43 | becomes the December contract entirely. So that's your that's your nearby |
| 594 | 01:01:43 --> 01:01:48 | contract, or front month. Then you have the next month out, which would be March |
| 595 | 01:01:48 --> 01:01:52 | 2025, and then the next month out would be June 2025, the next month out would |
| 596 | 01:01:52 --> 01:02:01 | be September 2025, in a carrying charge market where the normal pricing model is |
| 597 | 01:02:01 --> 01:02:06 | in play, you will have higher prices for like we're looking at corn or soybeans, |
| 598 | 01:02:07 --> 01:02:11 | usually it's more expensive. The price right now for this contract in December |
| 599 | 01:02:11 --> 01:02:19 | is trading at 19,007 97 Now, contrast that with NQ for the September contract, |
| 600 | 01:02:21 --> 01:02:26 | we're in the five hundreds. So there's a there's a premium in the December |
| 601 | 01:02:26 --> 01:02:30 | contract versus the price that's in September. You see that? Well, that's a |
| 602 | 01:02:30 --> 01:02:38 | normal carrying charge market, and it's more more useful in a real supply and |
| 603 | 01:02:38 --> 01:02:45 | demand market, like grains, cattle, something that we eat or consume oil. |
| 604 | 01:02:45 --> 01:02:49 | Okay, there's a real buying and selling demand in these markets, because they're |
| 605 | 01:02:49 --> 01:02:52 | like, they're the resources that makes the world go round. We don't really need |
| 606 | 01:02:52 --> 01:02:56 | to buy the S, P and the Nasdaq, just like we don't need to buy shares of |
| 607 | 01:02:56 --> 01:02:59 | stock. So while it's |
| 608 | 01:03:01 --> 01:03:06 | better for the market if you're bullish, to see the nearby contract trading for |
| 609 | 01:03:06 --> 01:03:11 | more money than the next months out in the future. In other words, the price |
| 610 | 01:03:11 --> 01:03:18 | should go higher in the future when you're looking at commodity prices. But |
| 611 | 01:03:18 --> 01:03:22 | if that ever reverses, and it's higher prices right now, then you have an |
| 612 | 01:03:22 --> 01:03:27 | inversion from a carrying charge market to a commercial bull market. That means |
| 613 | 01:03:27 --> 01:03:33 | large, large conglomerates and commercial users are more interested in |
| 614 | 01:03:33 --> 01:03:39 | buying it so much it can maintain a huge premium in price relative to the traded |
| 615 | 01:03:39 --> 01:03:43 | price of the distant month contracts. And if you're brand new, that probably |
| 616 | 01:03:43 --> 01:03:46 | went right over your head. But it's a very simple thing. If you go into the |
| 617 | 01:03:46 --> 01:03:51 | commodity teachings that I have in the 2027 mentorship, I believe it's month |
| 618 | 01:03:51 --> 01:03:57 | 10. I believe it's month 10. I split up that that month with bond trading, |
| 619 | 01:03:57 --> 01:04:06 | commodity trading, stock trading and for the life man, I can't remember the other |
| 620 | 01:04:06 --> 01:04:11 | ones I don't remember, but it's in there. I talk about it. But the, I'm not |
| 621 | 01:04:11 --> 01:04:13 | even sure how I got on this subject matter, but the, |
| 622 | 01:04:21 --> 01:04:25 | you have a model now you have no excuse not to be finding consistent setups |
| 623 | 01:04:25 --> 01:04:29 | every single day. You have an experiment laboratory for 30 minutes every single |
| 624 | 01:04:29 --> 01:04:36 | day. Caveat now, here is the spin. Here's the spin on that logic, as long |
| 625 | 01:04:36 --> 01:04:41 | as price remains below your stop loss when you're short, using this model, and |
| 626 | 01:04:41 --> 01:04:45 | we have not traded to the mid gap. You stay with the trade until you're either |
| 627 | 01:04:45 --> 01:04:53 | stopped out or you get your target. Is that complicated? Nope. Now how, how |
| 628 | 01:04:53 --> 01:04:59 | could you mess this up? Okay, here's how you mess it up. You're going to over |
| 629 | 01:04:59 --> 01:05:05 | leverage. You're going to try to trade before the fair value gap is traded too. |
| 630 | 01:05:07 --> 01:05:12 | You will not take the trade because you haven't watched it enough times for |
| 631 | 01:05:12 --> 01:05:18 | weeks and months to desensitize yourself to it, to trust the data. Don't just |
| 632 | 01:05:18 --> 01:05:21 | take my word for it. I don't want anybody taking my word for anything that |
| 633 | 01:05:21 --> 01:05:25 | I say, the open challenges is go in and see if this stuff isn't really going on, |
| 634 | 01:05:25 --> 01:05:29 | because once you see it, you can't unsee it. No one's going to convince you |
| 635 | 01:05:29 --> 01:05:32 | otherwise, and then you're a cult member for life, okay? And that's not a bad |
| 636 | 01:05:32 --> 01:05:36 | thing. It just means that you're part of the cult of winning. There's no other |
| 637 | 01:05:36 --> 01:05:42 | simpler system model that's mechanical. It's finite parameters, just like when |
| 638 | 01:05:42 --> 01:05:48 | you read a recipe, how many eggs does it call for? How much milk, how much sugar, |
| 639 | 01:05:48 --> 01:05:54 | how much flour, you can't go in here and say, You know what? This pineapple up |
| 640 | 01:05:54 --> 01:05:58 | the upside down. Pineapple cake calls for this, this, this, and this, you |
| 641 | 01:05:58 --> 01:06:03 | know, I just want to kick it up a notch and put my own spin on this, and I'm |
| 642 | 01:06:03 --> 01:06:11 | gonna throw in horseradish. The Hell yeah, that that's, that's what you're |
| 643 | 01:06:11 --> 01:06:15 | gonna mess it up with. You're gonna try to bring something else into it. Okay? |
| 644 | 01:06:15 --> 01:06:18 | You're gonna come up with some bullshit name for something and try to reinvent |
| 645 | 01:06:18 --> 01:06:26 | it so that we can go out and and here it is. But in my book, I'm going to |
| 646 | 01:06:26 --> 01:06:30 | reference these videos where it's time and date stamped, where you can see me |
| 647 | 01:06:31 --> 01:06:34 | giving the details about this. I promise you what I just taught is there's going |
| 648 | 01:06:34 --> 01:06:39 | to be dozens and dozens of books before the fucking November holiday. Amazon's |
| 649 | 01:06:39 --> 01:06:47 | going to have ICTs elite day trading model, 100% mechanical, and they're |
| 650 | 01:06:47 --> 01:06:51 | going to inflate the number 100% strike rate, guaranteed to make money, and it's |
| 651 | 01:06:51 --> 01:06:55 | going to be that's fake, that's false, but 70% of time, you're going to see |
| 652 | 01:06:55 --> 01:07:00 | that these parameters deliver but it still affords the ability for people to |
| 653 | 01:07:00 --> 01:07:03 | mess it up, because they're going to bring their own problems to it. They're |
| 654 | 01:07:03 --> 01:07:06 | going to be fearful, they're going to be too impatient, they're going to try to |
| 655 | 01:07:06 --> 01:07:09 | trade before they should. They're going to over leverage, or they're not going |
| 656 | 01:07:09 --> 01:07:13 | to be disciplined. They won't be in front of the charts to do it. They'll |
| 657 | 01:07:13 --> 01:07:19 | live a lifestyle that allows them to get drunk, inebriated and sleep over and |
| 658 | 01:07:19 --> 01:07:23 | miss it, and then, because they didn't take a trade the previous day, that was |
| 659 | 01:07:23 --> 01:07:27 | really, really good, then they'll over leverage on the next day, thinking, I |
| 660 | 01:07:27 --> 01:07:32 | gotta make up. You don't make up anything. You just take the trade based |
| 661 | 01:07:32 --> 01:07:38 | on the parameters, and that means trade with one contract, the smallest |
| 662 | 01:07:38 --> 01:07:45 | contract, the micro. And you desensitize yourself to the importance of the money. |
| 663 | 01:07:45 --> 01:07:51 | Take that part out of it for weeks. Up to give me at least one month where |
| 664 | 01:07:51 --> 01:07:55 | you're doing this every single day. So that way you have a whole month of data |
| 665 | 01:07:57 --> 01:08:00 | and then see what you were recording about what you felt when you were doing |
| 666 | 01:08:00 --> 01:08:04 | it, watching and observing it, did you get emotional about how you were |
| 667 | 01:08:04 --> 01:08:07 | failing? You're going to be right and conquering. Were you fearful that it |
| 668 | 01:08:07 --> 01:08:12 | wasn't going to work? You have to get that baseline measurement about you, |
| 669 | 01:08:12 --> 01:08:20 | because the you is what's going to mess it up. Okay, trust me, the first time I |
| 670 | 01:08:20 --> 01:08:24 | sat down and I put this to task. I was like, I want to have something that's |
| 671 | 01:08:24 --> 01:08:30 | mechanical, that I want to know that this is what I can do, and I will set up |
| 672 | 01:08:30 --> 01:08:36 | a scenario where I can automate it. And this is one of my first automated things |
| 673 | 01:08:36 --> 01:08:42 | with trading view. I'm not trading view, TradeStation. I did a lot of coding with |
| 674 | 01:08:42 --> 01:08:48 | easy language, with TradeStation back in the in the 90s, and this was one of my |
| 675 | 01:08:48 --> 01:08:53 | simplest, easy bread and butter just it's like a cash machine. It just simply |
| 676 | 01:08:53 --> 01:08:57 | will spit out the setups to you. And it's like an ATM with a pin code that, |
| 677 | 01:08:57 --> 01:09:01 | you know, has an endless supply of opportunity. It's just right there all |
| 678 | 01:09:01 --> 01:09:04 | the time. But I don't want you to believe that. I want you to go in and |
| 679 | 01:09:04 --> 01:09:08 | test it for yourself, because as soon as you see it, it's going to be like, What |
| 680 | 01:09:08 --> 01:09:11 | the hell you've been trying to do all this other stuff and the whole time, |
| 681 | 01:09:11 --> 01:09:15 | every single trading day. If these parameters are there, 40 handles are |
| 682 | 01:09:15 --> 01:09:21 | higher. There has to be 40 handles from previous settlement price to where we |
| 683 | 01:09:21 --> 01:09:28 | open first or more. It's better if it's larger. It's really, really good if it's |
| 684 | 01:09:28 --> 01:09:36 | larger than that, if, if it's over 200 handles I've seen in the last two years |
| 685 | 01:09:36 --> 01:09:44 | or so, I will defer trading this setup, because, chances are it might still keep |
| 686 | 01:09:44 --> 01:09:48 | running, because something out there is heavy manipulation going on. So 100 |
| 687 | 01:09:49 --> 01:09:52 | handles, let's make it a little bit clearer. 100 handles, approximately |
| 688 | 01:09:53 --> 01:09:59 | minimum 40 handles. That's your that's your sweet spot, okay? And if you use |
| 689 | 01:09:59 --> 01:10:04 | this. This mechanism. Okay, there's a lot of you guys that do coding and such. |
| 690 | 01:10:04 --> 01:10:07 | You have everything right there. I just gave you the documentation stage of it, |
| 691 | 01:10:08 --> 01:10:11 | like I did go through the coding aspect. And it's an easy fix of just putting a |
| 692 | 01:10:11 --> 01:10:16 | couple things there and then bang. You know where the stop goes? You know where |
| 693 | 01:10:16 --> 01:10:19 | your target is. You know what you're looking for. It's time based for the |
| 694 | 01:10:19 --> 01:10:28 | first fair value gap, the form one minute chart, and then by 10 o'clock it |
| 695 | 01:10:28 --> 01:10:32 | should deliver certain extent of time to mid part of the guy. Like, come on, man, |
| 696 | 01:10:32 --> 01:10:36 | seriously. Like, who's giving you anything close to that? You know what |
| 697 | 01:10:36 --> 01:10:40 | time it's going to set up. You know how long to hold on to it. You know what to |
| 698 | 01:10:40 --> 01:10:44 | do if it doesn't trade to the target yet. You hold it or let it get stopped |
| 699 | 01:10:44 --> 01:10:48 | out and be comfortable with it getting stopped out, because you should have a |
| 700 | 01:10:48 --> 01:10:53 | partial taken if you're trading with one contract, allow that stop out to happen |
| 701 | 01:10:53 --> 01:10:59 | and then and record what you felt as a result of that. You're going to go to I |
| 702 | 01:10:59 --> 01:11:01 | wish I would have closed to trade it. That's this point where it was the |
| 703 | 01:11:01 --> 01:11:09 | maximum open profit, but not realized. And if you do that, what you're saying |
| 704 | 01:11:09 --> 01:11:13 | is you want to be right, and you have to work on that. That's what you're |
| 705 | 01:11:13 --> 01:11:16 | supposed to be doing. When you're tape reading, you're discovering yourself. |
| 706 | 01:11:16 --> 01:11:19 | And when you demo trade, you're trying to discover where your bad habits are. |
| 707 | 01:11:19 --> 01:11:23 | You're not thinking that you want to have something to go online and online |
| 708 | 01:11:23 --> 01:11:26 | and show people look how much money I made today. And nobody's impressed by |
| 709 | 01:11:26 --> 01:11:33 | that. Nobody's impressed by that. Because if you can't make that bread for |
| 710 | 01:11:33 --> 01:11:39 | real and eat on it, that means make real money with it. What difference does it |
| 711 | 01:11:39 --> 01:11:44 | make? Everybody out there can get lucky, but this isn't luck. This is logic. This |
| 712 | 01:11:44 --> 01:11:52 | is very, very specific rules. If it's doing this, then you can look for this. |
| 713 | 01:11:52 --> 01:11:56 | When this does appear, then you can take action on it. And where's your stop go |
| 714 | 01:11:56 --> 01:11:59 | above candlestick number two, if you're short and when you're bullish, it goes |
| 715 | 01:11:59 --> 01:12:06 | below candlestick. Number two is low. How hard is that? It's not hard at all. |
| 716 | 01:12:08 --> 01:12:14 | And you take what the market gives you, some days, it's going to be amazing. The |
| 717 | 01:12:14 --> 01:12:18 | stop will be very small relative to the distance for where the first fair value |
| 718 | 01:12:18 --> 01:12:26 | got forms in your entry would be at to half the gap. So anyway, you can see, |
| 719 | 01:12:26 --> 01:12:31 | look at the characteristic of this market right now, double carried away |
| 720 | 01:12:34 --> 01:12:40 | the it's just ranging. And that's classic, the day before FOMC. So I'm |
| 721 | 01:12:40 --> 01:12:51 | going to strip this down to the two panel view, all right, and then I want |
| 722 | 01:12:51 --> 01:12:59 | that 15 second on the right side. And this is your one minute chart. Take this |
| 723 | 01:12:59 --> 01:13:07 | all here. All right, so see what they did here. We have these lows. This is |
| 724 | 01:13:07 --> 01:13:13 | jagged on the bottom, and what's up here? Short term, buy side. I'm |
| 725 | 01:13:23 --> 01:13:28 | in this fun, hidden learning with good old ICT fun. Give it a thumbs up if you |
| 726 | 01:13:28 --> 01:13:32 | appreciate the fact that this gave you something that's going to pay your your |
| 727 | 01:13:32 --> 01:13:36 | bills for the rest of your life. You don't have to pay for it either. No |
| 728 | 01:13:36 --> 01:13:42 | mentorships required, no book sales required. You have to spend any money, |
| 729 | 01:13:42 --> 01:13:47 | no money at all, and you got something that answers everything you'd ever need, |
| 730 | 01:13:49 --> 01:13:53 | and it doesn't need to concern you. If it's going to stop working, they're |
| 731 | 01:13:53 --> 01:13:57 | going to change your algorithm. It's literally, it's, it's something that's |
| 732 | 01:13:57 --> 01:14:00 | going to repeat in perpetuity. As long as there's markets, there's going to be |
| 733 | 01:14:00 --> 01:14:03 | an imbalance likely to happen in the morning session. You morning session. |
| 734 | 01:14:03 --> 01:14:08 | It's always there, and that's how they use an entice initial market sentiment. |
| 735 | 01:14:08 --> 01:14:13 | That's the purpose of the gap. It's not the buying and selling pressure. So all |
| 736 | 01:14:13 --> 01:14:15 | right, over here, we have 15 second chart. I'm |
| 737 | 01:14:25 --> 01:14:29 | a little spotty for 15 seconds because it's the day before FMC. I would |
| 738 | 01:14:38 --> 01:14:42 | not be terribly excited about this afternoon. So I know some of you that |
| 739 | 01:14:42 --> 01:14:47 | are watching you live stream try to avoid trading the afternoon. If you're |
| 740 | 01:14:47 --> 01:14:51 | going to trade it, just do it and you're in privacy, because you could probably |
| 741 | 01:14:51 --> 01:14:53 | be met with a little bit more difficulty, because you're getting |
| 742 | 01:14:53 --> 01:14:57 | closer to the time when absolutely nobody wants to do anything in the |
| 743 | 01:14:57 --> 01:15:02 | marketplace. Alright? So. Well, you can get a little bit more displacement here |
| 744 | 01:15:02 --> 01:15:04 | on that candle. Give us a fair value |
| 745 | 01:15:12 --> 01:15:15 | gap. Now, this is again, this is a drill. It's not meant for you to copy |
| 746 | 01:15:15 --> 01:15:21 | me. It's for you to get a baseline see what if it runs right to that, if it |
| 747 | 01:15:21 --> 01:15:32 | runs right to 1850 then we have to wait. Gotta give the gap on the 15 second. |
| 748 | 01:15:40 --> 01:15:45 | But you're doing these drills as many times as you can afford. To do it with |
| 749 | 01:15:45 --> 01:15:49 | your schedule. If you can only do like one or two a day, that's fine. It's just |
| 750 | 01:15:49 --> 01:15:54 | like an exercise routine. You go into lower time frames finding relative equal |
| 751 | 01:15:54 --> 01:15:59 | high or low, and you're not demanding your right? Okay, see that's not, don't |
| 752 | 01:15:59 --> 01:16:04 | want, I don't want to see that Melanie, have my buttons open. |
| 753 | 01:16:15 --> 01:16:20 | It's too close to the liquidity. I can wait. I don't have a job. I don't have |
| 754 | 01:16:20 --> 01:16:29 | anything to do today, so I can stay here as long as it takes. Just be confident |
| 755 | 01:16:29 --> 01:16:31 | that, you know, we can see these liquidity pools and see how easy it is, |
| 756 | 01:16:31 --> 01:16:35 | right to it. And that's just one instance where it'll do these. And |
| 757 | 01:16:35 --> 01:16:39 | that's it. That right there is something you should log. It didn't give you the |
| 758 | 01:16:39 --> 01:16:47 | setup like running into this I mentioned earlier. That's what I was aiming for. |
| 759 | 01:16:49 --> 01:16:52 | That's what I was aiming for. I wanted to get something in here with trade back |
| 760 | 01:16:52 --> 01:16:55 | into a fair value gap and then catch that. So you guys be like, What the hell |
| 761 | 01:16:55 --> 01:17:01 | he did it again? But sometimes they'll run without and the fair value gap just |
| 762 | 01:17:01 --> 01:17:05 | doesn't it's not given to you. And you can get mad about it. You can say, oh, |
| 763 | 01:17:05 --> 01:17:09 | man, I missed that move. Or you can say, you know, self, self, and say, this |
| 764 | 01:17:09 --> 01:17:13 | stuff repeats. There's no need for me to worry about it. I'm going to find |
| 765 | 01:17:13 --> 01:17:17 | another setup. All I do is sit here and relax. So let me go back to this real |
| 766 | 01:17:17 --> 01:17:22 | quick. We had these lows here, and this was made jagged so cell stops down here |
| 767 | 01:17:22 --> 01:17:26 | on the one minute chart were taken. Remember I was telling you earlier, if |
| 768 | 01:17:26 --> 01:17:31 | you're going to be doing these exercises, be aware. You may not know |
| 769 | 01:17:31 --> 01:17:35 | how to do this because you're you're learning, but figure out where the |
| 770 | 01:17:35 --> 01:17:41 | higher Time Frame draw is, which was what I showed you earlier, up here at |
| 771 | 01:17:41 --> 01:17:46 | 926, level. And I mentioned beginning to stream these up here that that's these |
| 772 | 01:17:46 --> 01:17:50 | are all potential draws because of this being the higher Time Frame reason for |
| 773 | 01:17:50 --> 01:17:54 | markets that want to go up there, those relative equal highs that we were |
| 774 | 01:17:54 --> 01:17:58 | watching in the September contract, that is the same level here just for the |
| 775 | 01:17:58 --> 01:18:03 | December contract. So the prices are different, but the same, same school of |
| 776 | 01:18:03 --> 01:18:07 | thought or reason to expect the trade there is still the same here, because |
| 777 | 01:18:07 --> 01:18:11 | it's still relative equal. Highs on the December contract is if you go back and |
| 778 | 01:18:11 --> 01:18:17 | look at the August, last week of august of 2024 in the December contract, it's a |
| 779 | 01:18:17 --> 01:18:21 | lot of gap, gaping price action, but doesn't change the fact that it's too |
| 780 | 01:18:21 --> 01:18:24 | smooth and we're most likely going to see it trade up in here. I'm not saying |
| 781 | 01:18:24 --> 01:18:29 | it means to do it today, but as a higher Time Frame draw if you're going to be |
| 782 | 01:18:29 --> 01:18:33 | doing these little exercises, get yourself desensitized to getting into |
| 783 | 01:18:33 --> 01:18:37 | trades. Get yourself some experience pushing the button, managing a stop |
| 784 | 01:18:37 --> 01:18:42 | loss, managing how you're going to endure getting it wrong, if you're |
| 785 | 01:18:43 --> 01:18:47 | getting it stopped out, if it runs in your favor, it gives you all these |
| 786 | 01:18:47 --> 01:18:51 | perfect little laboratory conditions where you're not influenced by the money |
| 787 | 01:18:52 --> 01:18:55 | you're doing one contract. You're not trying to pyramid, you're not trying to |
| 788 | 01:18:55 --> 01:18:59 | be perfect with your entry. You're just getting some kind of exposure in price |
| 789 | 01:18:59 --> 01:19:04 | action. Well, if we know that this is likely the draw here on the daily chart, |
| 790 | 01:19:05 --> 01:19:12 | then it's better for you to filter only going long if you're going to be using |
| 791 | 01:19:12 --> 01:19:18 | it to take trades with monetization at the end of it as a result. But don't |
| 792 | 01:19:18 --> 01:19:22 | think that way only while you're doing a baseline evaluation, because you want to |
| 793 | 01:19:22 --> 01:19:26 | see what it's like when you do it wrong, or if you get into a trade and it runs |
| 794 | 01:19:26 --> 01:19:30 | aggressively other way and doesn't go to your target, you need to identify how |
| 795 | 01:19:30 --> 01:19:33 | you're going to respond to that. You need to you need to know that as soon as |
| 796 | 01:19:33 --> 01:19:38 | you can in your trading, because it's going to highlight what your character |
| 797 | 01:19:38 --> 01:19:42 | flaws are, and don't hide from it. It it doesn't mean that you're a bad person. |
| 798 | 01:19:42 --> 01:19:45 | It doesn't mean you're a bad trader, or you can't become better with these |
| 799 | 01:19:45 --> 01:19:50 | features and functions that every human being has them. Sometimes, some people |
| 800 | 01:19:50 --> 01:19:56 | have really toxic, self defeating things about themselves, and they don't see it |
| 801 | 01:19:56 --> 01:19:59 | that way. They like to sugarcoat it and pretend and put makeup on them and wear |
| 802 | 01:19:59 --> 01:20:03 | a mask and. Say, you know, I don't have problems. It's everybody else, your |
| 803 | 01:20:03 --> 01:20:08 | mentor talking to you. I have a lot of things that I wrestle with, and you you |
| 804 | 01:20:08 --> 01:20:12 | as well, and they're going to materialize in your trading right now |
| 805 | 01:20:12 --> 01:20:19 | we're looking at how prices respecting that September 1, new week opening gap. |
| 806 | 01:20:19 --> 01:20:27 | There's an overlap of here. This low is a new week opening guide. Well, I'm |
| 807 | 01:20:27 --> 01:20:29 | watching the bodies here on the one minute chart, |
| 808 | 01:20:36 --> 01:20:43 | so we don't have any buy side to refer to here on the one minute chart. So we |
| 809 | 01:20:43 --> 01:20:45 | got to go up one time frame. |
| 810 | 01:20:52 --> 01:20:52 | Yeah, |
| 811 | 01:21:00 --> 01:21:08 | there's those relative equal highs on the 60 minute chart for December |
| 812 | 01:21:08 --> 01:21:17 | delivery the contract. All right, so we have this high right here. You see that |
| 813 | 01:21:19 --> 01:21:29 | wide this out a little bit for the center contract. We have this high it's |
| 814 | 01:21:29 --> 01:21:38 | moving still closer to the 19,009 26 level. So now that level, I'll change |
| 815 | 01:21:38 --> 01:21:41 | its style a little bit so you can see it differently. |
| 816 | 01:21:47 --> 01:21:51 | All right? So there's another pool. Look at the buy side, and it's framed on the |
| 817 | 01:21:51 --> 01:21:59 | hourly chart, and all we're doing is providing a means of framing and |
| 818 | 01:21:59 --> 01:22:04 | exercise. That's all it is. It's not a, I gotta be, right? It's it's not a, Mr. |
| 819 | 01:22:04 --> 01:22:08 | Precise, it's not about you making money. Do not monetize it. Don't take a |
| 820 | 01:22:08 --> 01:22:12 | trade on it. If I'm given something here to execute on you. |
| 821 | 01:22:27 --> 01:22:33 | I would like to see this stay open, because we already, we already dropped |
| 822 | 01:22:33 --> 01:22:33 | into it here |
| 823 | 01:22:42 --> 01:22:47 | and it didn't stay open there, but I would seen it stay open if it started to |
| 824 | 01:22:47 --> 01:22:51 | displace higher, then that could have created a fair value gap. That's what I |
| 825 | 01:22:51 --> 01:22:51 | mean by |
| 826 | 01:22:58 --> 01:23:05 | that. So new week, opening gap once at the Reverse, just about near Its high. |
| 827 | 01:23:06 --> 01:23:07 | There I'm |
| 828 | 01:24:00 --> 01:24:54 | All Right? I all I just did was annotate the minor buy side and sell side. How do |
| 829 | 01:24:54 --> 01:24:57 | I know that there's buy side? Because the market turned here and went lower. |
| 830 | 01:24:57 --> 01:25:03 | We created a swing low here. In this candlestick right there as soon as it |
| 831 | 01:25:03 --> 01:25:08 | closed, that validated this as a swing low. So anyone that's long, they could |
| 832 | 01:25:08 --> 01:25:11 | theoretically, and that's all we're doing theoretically, is assuming that |
| 833 | 01:25:11 --> 01:25:15 | there's going to be some measure of stops below there, and then the buy side |
| 834 | 01:25:15 --> 01:25:20 | would be here. I'm I |
| 835 | 01:25:38 --> 01:25:46 | just missed it. Sorry I that candlestick right there when I hit that, that was |
| 836 | 01:25:46 --> 01:25:52 | the entry for buy side. And then I would want To see inversion in here. I'm |
| 837 | 01:26:40 --> 01:26:49 | right? We have this big block of back and forth price action, where it spent |
| 838 | 01:26:49 --> 01:26:58 | time, a lot of time, back and forth in this range. So 19, 813, 50 is also |
| 839 | 01:26:58 --> 01:27:09 | September's 13 daily high. So I'm not I'm not impressed with the run below the |
| 840 | 01:27:09 --> 01:27:13 | short term low. Just to get to that level, it's not like I don't I don't see |
| 841 | 01:27:13 --> 01:27:15 | it like it's breaking down. To keep going lower, it's going to have to prove |
| 842 | 01:27:15 --> 01:27:22 | something significant to me on the downside, I'm more inclined to fish on |
| 843 | 01:27:22 --> 01:27:27 | the upside, and it can drop, and it's fine. It won't, it won't be something |
| 844 | 01:27:27 --> 01:27:31 | that would be regretful over, because you have to have rules. And the rules |
| 845 | 01:27:31 --> 01:27:38 | here, I'm not trying to be short. We've already shown a willingness to gravitate |
| 846 | 01:27:38 --> 01:27:49 | towards that 19. I 860, 2.75 level, and it's not even close to the relative |
| 847 | 01:27:49 --> 01:27:52 | equal highs at the 926, level. I |
| 848 | 01:28:04 --> 01:28:09 | a breaker, low, high, lower, low. This candles range, and we have that little |
| 849 | 01:28:09 --> 01:28:12 | inefficiency there. That's where we're in. We're inside of that right now. So |
| 850 | 01:28:12 --> 01:28:18 | I'm watching it. So we're inside of September 13, old daily high. And while |
| 851 | 01:28:18 --> 01:28:22 | I'm talking on your own charts, you should drop a line on that September 13 |
| 852 | 01:28:22 --> 01:28:30 | daily high, and you'll see what that level is. But here's a breaker, so it |
| 853 | 01:28:30 --> 01:28:36 | looks like this, so I'm not |
| 854 | 01:28:42 --> 01:28:43 | inside that range right there. |
| 855 | 01:28:58 --> 01:29:06 | Now, if we lose this range to the downside, then we may have done enough |
| 856 | 01:29:06 --> 01:29:11 | for the morning session going into lunch macro, where they'll move against the |
| 857 | 01:29:11 --> 01:29:17 | traders that have been long. That would be this sell side, resting right Here on |
| 858 | 01:29:17 --> 01:29:18 | the left hand side chart. And |
| 859 | 01:29:55 --> 01:29:56 | but it has to leave this blue shaded area i. |
| 860 | 01:30:05 --> 01:30:07 | If the breaker wasn't there, this would be the |
| 861 | 01:30:15 --> 01:30:17 | Short now, if I side goes to Here, I |
| 862 | 01:30:47 --> 01:30:48 | There you go. |
| 863 | 01:31:00 --> 01:31:07 | And new week opening gap that's going to go below here. It's reasonable to see |
| 864 | 01:31:07 --> 01:31:09 | it. Try to reach into that as well. I'm |
| 865 | 01:31:37 --> 01:31:38 | What time is it? I? |
| 866 | 01:31:46 --> 01:31:58 | 1015, 1110, macro, sell side. That little gap right there, that's the one, |
| 867 | 01:31:58 --> 01:32:06 | but I wanted to see it come down and give me one tiny little gap below that. |
| 868 | 01:32:06 --> 01:32:10 | That was the one I was wanting to aim on. But I gave you this before it |
| 869 | 01:32:10 --> 01:32:14 | happened. So it's, it's a consolation prize. It's called that. I know some of |
| 870 | 01:32:14 --> 01:32:21 | you are still hammering on whatever I'm saying. If you took that. Don't tell me, |
| 871 | 01:32:21 --> 01:32:24 | people are still not listening to telling me in the comment section, this |
| 872 | 01:32:24 --> 01:32:27 | is, this is what I took. It took right here. I made this. I passed my comment. |
| 873 | 01:32:27 --> 01:32:27 | All |
| 874 | 01:32:34 --> 01:32:40 | right, so day low here. I'm not convinced that they're going to come |
| 875 | 01:32:40 --> 01:32:46 | down that far, but I'm willing to give it another opportunity to sweep below |
| 876 | 01:32:46 --> 01:33:00 | here once more. So this low now becomes sell side. So any little rally in here, |
| 877 | 01:33:01 --> 01:33:05 | as long as I don't go to the mean threshold of the breaker, that's this |
| 878 | 01:33:05 --> 01:33:11 | range here on the one minute chart, then could be just setting up a retracement |
| 879 | 01:33:11 --> 01:33:15 | here. Just dive one more time and get into new week opening gap. Well, then if |
| 880 | 01:33:15 --> 01:33:20 | I can get a rally after that, I'll work with any fair value gap there to treat |
| 881 | 01:33:20 --> 01:33:28 | back up to the breaker. If it can afford me 20 handles range. That's the that's |
| 882 | 01:33:28 --> 01:33:33 | the filter. It's gotta give me at least 20 handles of where I try to get mad at |
| 883 | 01:33:33 --> 01:33:37 | and where I'm trying to aim for. If I can't frame that, then I have to sit |
| 884 | 01:33:37 --> 01:33:43 | still and it can we can see the moves coming, but it's not frameable based on |
| 885 | 01:33:43 --> 01:33:48 | the watch come performing for Caleb, which is 20 handles run from entry you |
| 886 | 01:34:00 --> 01:34:21 | now, because we're below this breaker, low, low, high, low or low, then rallied |
| 887 | 01:34:22 --> 01:34:30 | to new week of putting gaps, broke down, went below the breaker here. So as long |
| 888 | 01:34:30 --> 01:34:33 | as we're below half of this range, I |
| 889 | 01:34:38 --> 01:34:41 | wouldn't be interested in anything long. I'm. |
| 890 | 01:35:01 --> 01:35:04 | So what I'm saying is, I'm looking for some reason for the market to fail to |
| 891 | 01:35:04 --> 01:35:09 | get above the midpoint. It can trade where it's at here. That's That's |
| 892 | 01:35:09 --> 01:35:13 | normal. Can trade me up to it. But the gaps, the PD arrays, everything that I |
| 893 | 01:35:13 --> 01:35:18 | have, that I key off of in price, they all have an inverted aspect to them, so |
| 894 | 01:35:18 --> 01:35:24 | they can be treated the opposite. So what you think about classic Support |
| 895 | 01:35:24 --> 01:35:28 | Resistance? I can apply that to these things here, but it's not classic |
| 896 | 01:35:28 --> 01:35:33 | Support Resistance. It's very specific candles. It's very specific prices, the |
| 897 | 01:35:33 --> 01:35:38 | low the lower quadrant and the halfway or mean threshold, because it's an order |
| 898 | 01:35:38 --> 01:35:39 | block. So |
| 899 | 01:35:44 --> 01:35:53 | so half of this breaker to its low. That's like the the area where the the |
| 900 | 01:35:53 --> 01:35:59 | turn could happen in a run below this low, down the end in log, that would be |
| 901 | 01:35:59 --> 01:36:05 | a setup. We have a gap here. If it runs away again, then It's just making my day |
| 902 | 01:36:05 --> 01:36:06 | longer. You |
| 903 | 01:36:40 --> 01:36:53 | I want to put a short one so that we can see trading against a higher Time Frame, |
| 904 | 01:36:53 --> 01:36:58 | likely bias on a day prior to FOMC, late in the morning Session, i |
| 905 | 01:38:31 --> 01:38:35 | i see it wanting to Take this short term high here first i |
| 906 | 01:38:55 --> 01:38:59 | i see how much time it's staying inside that gap. Oh, here. You don't want to |
| 907 | 01:38:59 --> 01:39:00 | see that, |
| 908 | 01:39:11 --> 01:39:16 | and that would have stopped out so I could see where I'd be wrong. And as |
| 909 | 01:39:16 --> 01:39:22 | much as it would probably entertain for some of you. If I would have took that |
| 910 | 01:39:22 --> 01:39:31 | entry, I just know that it's not it's not there, it's not there yet. But using |
| 911 | 01:39:31 --> 01:39:33 | that one, you would have been stopped out or I would have been stopped out |
| 912 | 01:39:33 --> 01:39:41 | there. How did I know that? Because I think that this was too easy, too |
| 913 | 01:39:41 --> 01:39:44 | shallow. And I think either they're going to send it higher or they're going |
| 914 | 01:39:44 --> 01:39:48 | to take it right above this high Anyway, before it goes below these relative |
| 915 | 01:39:48 --> 01:39:54 | equal lows. So in between that little I can justify both sides, and if I can do |
| 916 | 01:39:54 --> 01:39:59 | that, it's not high probability. So it's given me the ability to show you. Caleb, |
| 917 | 01:39:59 --> 01:40:05 | okay. That just because it looks like it's a fair value gap, where we at, what |
| 918 | 01:40:05 --> 01:40:10 | time we're at, and how it just delivered that little tiny wick into the lower |
| 919 | 01:40:10 --> 01:40:20 | half of that break I was annotating, I feel like we've pushed it up a little |
| 920 | 01:40:20 --> 01:40:27 | bit from 930s high, we went lower. We consolidated. Made all of this in here |
| 921 | 01:40:27 --> 01:40:33 | jagged him once more here after trading into the new week, opening gaps above |
| 922 | 01:40:35 --> 01:40:46 | the initial high of the day, because we've had 1234, lows produced to the |
| 923 | 01:40:46 --> 01:40:51 | downside. This is really, really jagged, and I'm I would be trying to sell short |
| 924 | 01:40:52 --> 01:40:58 | in the very like low end of the of the range. So what would I be doing selling |
| 925 | 01:40:58 --> 01:41:03 | here? I'm selling a discount. There's people out there want to buy something |
| 926 | 01:41:04 --> 01:41:09 | cheap. So I'm watching this high here because that'll tell me what I want to |
| 927 | 01:41:09 --> 01:41:16 | do. I told you I'm not leaving until I I get something that I can frame on and |
| 928 | 01:41:16 --> 01:41:24 | look at this is this slowly gyriding up to that little high right there. So |
| 929 | 01:41:24 --> 01:41:27 | anyone that's trying to be short or that is short, not that they're all using a |
| 930 | 01:41:27 --> 01:41:31 | 15 second chart, mind you, but you can see that high is also in the limited |
| 931 | 01:41:31 --> 01:41:38 | chart. So you have to sit still sometimes, and if you don't know what |
| 932 | 01:41:38 --> 01:41:43 | you're looking for, it could be frustrating, and just drag you nuts. But |
| 933 | 01:41:46 --> 01:41:49 | there has to be some reason why you're taking the trade. You can't just simply |
| 934 | 01:41:49 --> 01:41:53 | push the button to find out. I'm not here for that. I'm here to teach my son |
| 935 | 01:41:53 --> 01:42:00 | patience, teach him look at things with rules, frame the probabilities and |
| 936 | 01:42:00 --> 01:42:02 | justify why I will or why I won't. |
| 937 | 01:42:14 --> 01:42:18 | Alright, so now we have somewhat of a balanced price range in here. I mean, |
| 938 | 01:42:18 --> 01:42:23 | it's on the 15 second chart. I don't want to make too much of that. But this |
| 939 | 01:42:23 --> 01:42:28 | little gap here, we're seeing these little tiny candlesticks reaching up. I |
| 940 | 01:42:28 --> 01:42:33 | would like to see it just go above this high here and then come back down into |
| 941 | 01:42:33 --> 01:42:41 | this inefficiency and see if it can support it with inversion |
| 942 | 01:42:41 --> 01:42:44 | characteristics. Take this midline off. |
| 943 | 01:42:49 --> 01:42:52 | Just bumped the low of that breaker block. I don't want |
| 944 | 01:42:58 --> 01:43:01 | to see it hit the bottom of the breaker block and come down in here. I wanted to |
| 945 | 01:43:01 --> 01:43:05 | see it take this high. I high, come down, hit that, and then if it shows |
| 946 | 01:43:05 --> 01:43:08 | displacement higher off of that, then it to me, it's a little bit more |
| 947 | 01:43:08 --> 01:43:13 | trustworthy to the upside. And then I can entertain maybe I run into the high |
| 948 | 01:43:13 --> 01:43:16 | the breaker, or this inefficiency right there, I'm |
| 949 | 01:43:36 --> 01:43:36 | Come on. |
| 950 | 01:43:42 --> 01:44:03 | You. Now take a screenshot of what we're looking at here. This is exactly where |
| 951 | 01:44:05 --> 01:44:09 | you can identify where you do not want to trade. I'm going to force myself to |
| 952 | 01:44:09 --> 01:44:12 | trade in this environment because I want you to see the difficulties of it. I'll |
| 953 | 01:44:12 --> 01:44:15 | probably going to fail in it. That's why I'm telling you. Don't, don't copy this |
| 954 | 01:44:15 --> 01:44:20 | one. But I want you to see before I do anything, look at how it's behaving. Is |
| 955 | 01:44:21 --> 01:44:25 | it animated? To try to get anywhere in a quick, fast, sudden manner? No, it's |
| 956 | 01:44:25 --> 01:44:31 | just like I'm just moving around a little bit lethargically either side of |
| 957 | 01:44:31 --> 01:44:36 | the marketplace. It should have dropped here, if this was a valid fair value |
| 958 | 01:44:36 --> 01:44:41 | gap, which I told you, because of all the things that are on the one minute |
| 959 | 01:44:41 --> 01:44:46 | chart that doesn't bode well for selling short, that that cheap or low in the in |
| 960 | 01:44:46 --> 01:44:53 | the daily range after it's already had this big drop down. So this lunch macro, |
| 961 | 01:44:53 --> 01:44:59 | where it took the sell side out over here, that right there, it might be the |
| 962 | 01:44:59 --> 01:45:06 | low. And we could be higher in the afternoon. That's what I wanted right |
| 963 | 01:45:06 --> 01:45:13 | there now, because this inefficiency is the only one that has any interest to me |
| 964 | 01:45:13 --> 01:45:18 | at all. I want to see duty dive it back down into this, and then if it can hit |
| 965 | 01:45:18 --> 01:45:24 | this, but not go through it with a body, if it can hit it and displace higher, |
| 966 | 01:45:24 --> 01:45:28 | like a big, nice series of one or two candles to the upside, create an |
| 967 | 01:45:28 --> 01:45:32 | inefficiency there, then that could be a catalyst to get us up into that |
| 968 | 01:45:32 --> 01:45:39 | inefficiency there. Apologize. Caleb, I did not want the video to be this long. |
| 969 | 01:45:40 --> 01:45:48 | Shut up. ICT, you're here till you're 90. You're here till you'll be doing |
| 970 | 01:45:48 --> 01:45:55 | this till you're 90. That was a funny line of dipple, but I asked you to take |
| 971 | 01:45:55 --> 01:46:03 | a screenshot because the way prices just meandering around. Okay? That is what |
| 972 | 01:46:03 --> 01:46:09 | happens when the market enters a buy model. It just sent not, I'm sorry, buy |
| 973 | 01:46:09 --> 01:46:12 | program where it just starts ticking higher. It doesn't matter how many |
| 974 | 01:46:12 --> 01:46:15 | people are selling, shorter buying, it's just going to keep offering higher |
| 975 | 01:46:15 --> 01:46:19 | prices, keep high, higher, higher, higher. And it starts squeezing and |
| 976 | 01:46:19 --> 01:46:22 | squeezing and squeezing. And then as it gets to a level where there is |
| 977 | 01:46:22 --> 01:46:26 | inefficiency or liquidity, and the one minute chart, you see it right here. |
| 978 | 01:46:27 --> 01:46:29 | That's that short term high |
| 979 | 01:46:34 --> 01:46:38 | these are very, very challenging conditions when it's behaving this way, |
| 980 | 01:46:39 --> 01:46:47 | if you're if you're brand new. You can be smacked around a little bit or |
| 981 | 01:46:47 --> 01:46:50 | frustrated. So |
| 982 | 01:46:58 --> 01:47:00 | there's your buy side. You all |
| 983 | 01:47:06 --> 01:47:12 | right, so then we're back above the mean threshold of that breaker over here. |
| 984 | 01:47:13 --> 01:47:17 | That's this candlestick right there. It's the last up close candle right |
| 985 | 01:47:17 --> 01:47:22 | before the drop down to a lower low there. So it's a low, high, lower, low. |
| 986 | 01:47:31 --> 01:47:36 | It did not come down to hit this area here. It just kept booking price, |
| 987 | 01:47:36 --> 01:47:39 | higher, higher, higher, higher, higher. So they're going to make a mad dash up |
| 988 | 01:47:40 --> 01:47:43 | that attack these, these buy stops, I see |
| 989 | 01:47:52 --> 01:47:52 | These drawings today, |
| 990 | 01:48:00 --> 01:48:07 | calling it live. We're doing it live. See, push this to the back. |
| 991 | 01:48:18 --> 01:48:30 | So we're back at September 13 daily high, top of the breaker now, because we |
| 992 | 01:48:30 --> 01:48:37 | have this area of inefficiency. Now, mind you, it's anchored on a 32nd chart. |
| 993 | 01:48:37 --> 01:48:41 | So bear that in mind, it's not like it's on an hourly chart, where, if this were |
| 994 | 01:48:41 --> 01:48:45 | an inefficiency in this time frame, were a one hour chart or 60 minute chart, |
| 995 | 01:48:46 --> 01:48:50 | price would have no problem going up with one single candle into this little |
| 996 | 01:48:50 --> 01:48:54 | area. It can still do it on on the 15 second chart, that that's still a |
| 997 | 01:48:54 --> 01:48:59 | characteristic. But because it's only in a 15 second chart that it has this |
| 998 | 01:48:59 --> 01:49:03 | inefficiency there, because if you look at it right here, it's it's been offered |
| 999 | 01:49:03 --> 01:49:08 | by side delivery, and then this single candle on the one minute chart, inside |
| 1000 | 01:49:08 --> 01:49:15 | that moment charts range, we have this small little inefficiency there. So |
| 1001 | 01:49:16 --> 01:49:21 | keeping to the the rules, I'd still would like to see it Ram up in there |
| 1002 | 01:49:21 --> 01:49:24 | pretty quick. And if it's going to get in there, why not just take out the |
| 1003 | 01:49:24 --> 01:49:26 | liquidity right right there, |
| 1004 | 01:49:32 --> 01:49:37 | working towards the low end of that breaker, spiking through mean threshold, |
| 1005 | 01:49:37 --> 01:49:43 | which is the midpoint whenever there's an order block, half of that range is |
| 1006 | 01:49:43 --> 01:49:50 | always mean threshold. If it's a gap or a wick, the midpoint is constant |
| 1007 | 01:49:50 --> 01:49:55 | encroachment. The books will explain why those names were given to it. I just |
| 1008 | 01:49:55 --> 01:50:00 | don't want to talk about that publicly, because it makes people stupid. Um. Look |
| 1009 | 01:50:00 --> 01:50:06 | smart. That's it. Incorrectly. It makes stupid people or fraud. My people look |
| 1010 | 01:50:06 --> 01:50:14 | smart. There's no sense of helping them write their cliff note. Cliff note |
| 1011 | 01:50:14 --> 01:50:19 | version of my concept. Just to get a book out there, you don't even make a |
| 1012 | 01:50:19 --> 01:50:22 | lot of money on the books. I mean, it's not even that big of a profitable |
| 1013 | 01:50:22 --> 01:50:28 | venture. The only thing I'm concerned about is making sure I record it in the |
| 1014 | 01:50:28 --> 01:50:33 | annals of history, that this is what it is. This is who it came from, and now |
| 1015 | 01:50:33 --> 01:50:41 | it's my gift to you. All right, so we're at mean threshold, half of the breaker. |
| 1016 | 01:50:44 --> 01:50:52 | And we have an inefficiency right there. And like to see that be used as |
| 1017 | 01:50:52 --> 01:50:57 | inversion. So it would, you want to see it go away from a little bit and come |
| 1018 | 01:50:57 --> 01:51:05 | back down into it and it run up into the inefficiency right there. |
| 1019 | 01:51:10 --> 01:51:17 | Now look at the delivery of price here on the one minute chart. Watch how when |
| 1020 | 01:51:17 --> 01:51:26 | it goes higher. Do you see any gaps? This was immediate rebalance, really, |
| 1021 | 01:51:26 --> 01:51:30 | really, really, small, little volume imbalance there, but no fair value. Got |
| 1022 | 01:51:30 --> 01:51:37 | see that and then delivered to the high the breaker. This is classy, and so I |
| 1023 | 01:51:37 --> 01:51:40 | tell you, take a screenshot of that, because when you start seeing price |
| 1024 | 01:51:40 --> 01:51:45 | doing this. That is the algorithm in a buy program. That means it's simply |
| 1025 | 01:51:45 --> 01:51:49 | going to keep offering higher prices. It does not matter what your little book |
| 1026 | 01:51:49 --> 01:51:53 | map things say. Doesn't matter what your liquidity things say. It means it's just |
| 1027 | 01:51:53 --> 01:51:57 | going to start marching higher, higher, higher, higher. That was the reason why |
| 1028 | 01:51:57 --> 01:52:00 | I stopped. I was going to take the short in here, just to illustrate. This is |
| 1029 | 01:52:00 --> 01:52:04 | shorting. And I was like, You know what? Why do that? It's better for me to |
| 1030 | 01:52:04 --> 01:52:09 | illustrate why that's not even a good one. So the screenshot of you seeing how |
| 1031 | 01:52:09 --> 01:52:15 | price is not giving you any kind of fair value gap. It's just one steady just |
| 1032 | 01:52:15 --> 01:52:18 | booking, higher booking, higher booking, higher booking, higher and no |
| 1033 | 01:52:18 --> 01:52:23 | inefficiency. So if you're offside in that it's very, very painful, extremely |
| 1034 | 01:52:23 --> 01:52:27 | painful. Notice the bodies, we never left it and came back down. The bodies |
| 1035 | 01:52:27 --> 01:52:32 | are staying inside of it. So is that? Is that displacement to the outside? No, I |
| 1036 | 01:52:47 --> 01:52:51 | I thought you had me. Didn't you feel? Yeah, yeah. |
| 1037 | 01:53:00 --> 01:53:00 | All right, I'm |
| 1038 | 01:53:32 --> 01:53:37 | if you weren't here today, what would you be doing, wasting your time. You're |
| 1039 | 01:53:37 --> 01:53:43 | learning how to read and navigate price action, navigating it, understanding why |
| 1040 | 01:53:43 --> 01:53:51 | it should or shouldn't, everything I can't do in a book. Imagine these as |
| 1041 | 01:53:51 --> 01:53:56 | chapters in a book. It's, it's very hard to write that kind of stuff and make it |
| 1042 | 01:53:56 --> 01:54:05 | make sense. It's, you have to see it. That's why. Hate to say it, but 99.99% |
| 1043 | 01:54:07 --> 01:54:13 | of any trading books are useless because a static picture and a couple paragraphs |
| 1044 | 01:54:13 --> 01:54:18 | or whatnot doesn't adequately describe what it's communicating. I'm sure the |
| 1045 | 01:54:18 --> 01:54:22 | authors are well intended. I would have intentions, because I don't mind |
| 1046 | 01:54:22 --> 01:54:26 | spending time bliviating in great detail about what I expect to see in price. I |
| 1047 | 01:54:28 --> 01:54:34 | want to see this small little portion stay open, and now, because we had this |
| 1048 | 01:54:34 --> 01:54:39 | nice little retracement up in here, I'll explore the downside. I want to see if |
| 1049 | 01:54:39 --> 01:54:43 | we can get to mean threshold. I'm sorry, consequence, correction of this gap, no |
| 1050 | 01:54:53 --> 01:54:57 | stains out there. All right, wait, I'll wait for it again. Do. |
| 1051 | 01:55:08 --> 01:55:11 | I believe it's going below this low. So that way we understand what I'm |
| 1052 | 01:55:11 --> 01:55:15 | expecting. We had this nice, deep retracement. It pressed higher, higher, |
| 1053 | 01:55:15 --> 01:55:20 | higher, higher, higher, higher, higher, to the top of the breaker. We couldn't |
| 1054 | 01:55:20 --> 01:55:24 | find inversion there. All the bodies stayed inside of it. Nice displacement |
| 1055 | 01:55:24 --> 01:55:28 | to the downside. We rally back up. I want to see this small little segment of |
| 1056 | 01:55:28 --> 01:55:32 | price action here stay open, meaning that I don't want to see it trade back |
| 1057 | 01:55:32 --> 01:55:35 | to the bottom of that blue box or into that volume of balance. I like to see |
| 1058 | 01:55:35 --> 01:55:40 | that stuff stay there. And if we can find ourselves heavy in this area, that |
| 1059 | 01:55:40 --> 01:55:44 | should allow for a run to get to the sales up. They still have to wait for |
| 1060 | 01:55:44 --> 01:55:47 | the fair value gap. That makes sense, and that isn't making sense yet. It's |
| 1061 | 01:55:47 --> 01:55:50 | got to still work out the creases. |
| 1062 | 01:55:58 --> 01:56:04 | So knowing how you can fail, knowing how you can lose money, identifying it and |
| 1063 | 01:56:04 --> 01:56:10 | saying, No, this isn't it. That's going to come with experience. It's not a |
| 1064 | 01:56:10 --> 01:56:14 | matter of going out there and try to trade everything and make money. The |
| 1065 | 01:56:14 --> 01:56:23 | main thing is capital preservation. See, I don't want that. I ideally it should |
| 1066 | 01:56:23 --> 01:56:29 | have went to consequent encouragement of that gap right there. Why that one? |
| 1067 | 01:56:29 --> 01:56:34 | Because it's matching basically this one, single candle up, single candle |
| 1068 | 01:56:34 --> 01:56:38 | down. They're sharing the same spatial range between their highs and lows that |
| 1069 | 01:56:38 --> 01:56:43 | make this imbalances. So that's a balanced price range, so I want to see |
| 1070 | 01:56:43 --> 01:56:47 | it trade down below it and show a willingness to hit half of that and then |
| 1071 | 01:56:47 --> 01:56:51 | drop. Then that drop would be candlestick number two of a fair value |
| 1072 | 01:56:51 --> 01:56:54 | gap that I could use to get in, to get short and then run down here. But since |
| 1073 | 01:56:54 --> 01:56:56 | it's not doing that, I have to sit still. I'm |
| 1074 | 01:57:03 --> 01:57:10 | now we got the volume of balance redelivered too, and now we're at, I |
| 1075 | 01:57:10 --> 01:57:20 | mean, it could, it could roll over here lower, but it needs to show a |
| 1076 | 01:57:20 --> 01:57:26 | displacement sharp, way down and down. So I want something at mid range of this |
| 1077 | 01:57:26 --> 01:57:31 | gap down here, even though this is a higher price, that if it's going to |
| 1078 | 01:57:31 --> 01:57:35 | drop, this would be a better entry, because it's a higher premium price. I |
| 1079 | 01:57:35 --> 01:57:38 | don't I don't trust that my entry there would be sound. I |
| 1080 | 01:57:44 --> 01:57:47 | watch that wick right here. I |
| 1081 | 01:58:51 --> 01:58:56 | now I don't want to see if I want to try to frame it out of which is I'm trying |
| 1082 | 01:58:56 --> 01:59:00 | to force myself into taking a short to this low. Yeah, I don't want to see it |
| 1083 | 01:59:00 --> 01:59:06 | support price there. I like to see it lay down a candlestick, but not close |
| 1084 | 01:59:06 --> 01:59:14 | outside the low of it and create A inefficiency so I can position inside of |
| 1085 | 01:59:14 --> 01:59:14 | that I'm |
| 1086 | 01:59:40 --> 01:59:56 | uh, volume and balance delivered to that. Now this right here. Just deliver |
| 1087 | 01:59:56 --> 02:00:00 | it, man, there you go. Now, don't run away. Don't run away. Don't run away. |
| 1088 | 02:00:00 --> 02:00:01 | Don't run away yet. I'm |
| 1089 | 02:00:12 --> 02:00:19 | gonna see if we can touch the bottom of that inversion fair value gap. Not yet. |
| 1090 | 02:00:19 --> 02:00:32 | I'm blame the balance right there, and, oh, you fucking kidding me. Okay, well, |
| 1091 | 02:00:33 --> 02:00:38 | we're gonna have to pretend. Okay, the stop loss would have to be above this |
| 1092 | 02:00:38 --> 02:00:43 | candle sticks, consequent crochet of the wick, that's where my stock would be. So |
| 1093 | 02:00:43 --> 02:00:47 | that way you can see, you can see where it would be at. Told you I teach for the |
| 1094 | 02:00:47 --> 02:00:48 | demo. So some of you, |
| 1095 | 02:00:56 --> 02:01:02 | okay, so it would be one tick above that, and the limit order would be at |
| 1096 | 02:01:02 --> 02:01:13 | that price, okay, 745, and a quarter. It's this fair value gap there. Trading |
| 1097 | 02:01:13 --> 02:01:26 | view. Come on now. This is the gap right there. That's how it's eyeballing. There |
| 1098 | 02:01:35 --> 02:01:44 | you go. You can take a partial there. I |
| 1099 | 02:02:06 --> 02:02:14 | not as sexy as is when you see the executions, that's okay. I'll work with |
| 1100 | 02:02:14 --> 02:02:15 | it with yellow. |
| 1101 | 02:02:28 --> 02:02:32 | Trading view, you cannot do any maintenance during live streams to ICT, |
| 1102 | 02:02:32 --> 02:02:39 | okay, it's not good for marketing. For you, it's not good. So always see what |
| 1103 | 02:02:39 --> 02:02:42 | time you plan on doing maintenance. Schedule outside the times. I'm going to |
| 1104 | 02:02:42 --> 02:02:52 | be live streaming. So you would be in with the stop that covers The costs, and |
| 1105 | 02:02:52 --> 02:02:58 | you'd be In one partial already. So |
| 1106 | 02:03:40 --> 02:04:01 | I Got some relative equal loads. There. |
| 1107 | 02:04:22 --> 02:04:39 | You that would be a partial tonight, have two partials booked. Stop what |
| 1108 | 02:04:39 --> 02:04:43 | state rate where it's at, so it doesn't matter where it goes. Now, you stick |
| 1109 | 02:04:43 --> 02:04:50 | with it and aim for this lower here, and just relax that whatever's going to |
| 1110 | 02:04:50 --> 02:04:51 | happen, happen. You. |
| 1111 | 02:05:20 --> 02:05:22 | I start with Roll to here And |
| 1112 | 02:06:31 --> 02:06:36 | and you'd stop out on the balance there, and you do all your markups to get all |
| 1113 | 02:06:36 --> 02:06:41 | your information from where you were entering. What was a total drawdown, how |
| 1114 | 02:06:41 --> 02:06:46 | much heat, in other words, the tree would have had placed on you. And you |
| 1115 | 02:06:46 --> 02:06:50 | take your partials, where I was queuing up. Audibly, you would take a partial, |
| 1116 | 02:06:51 --> 02:06:55 | and then the partial here, and we rolled the stop down, because once we have a |
| 1117 | 02:06:55 --> 02:07:03 | partial, a second one, and we're getting close to the low. We're looking for this |
| 1118 | 02:07:04 --> 02:07:08 | this low here, and the rejection block is what I was looking at. And that's why |
| 1119 | 02:07:08 --> 02:07:12 | I said to drop the stop theoretically, hypothetically to here, because what |
| 1120 | 02:07:12 --> 02:07:16 | we're doing is what I taught you in this mentorship, where, if you don't know how |
| 1121 | 02:07:16 --> 02:07:22 | to time or select the partials to get out of the trade with pieces of it and |
| 1122 | 02:07:22 --> 02:07:29 | profit by chasing down a recent high. Just let the market take you out. It |
| 1123 | 02:07:29 --> 02:07:34 | removes all the worry about which one should I do, or how should I manage it? |
| 1124 | 02:07:34 --> 02:07:39 | You got two partials. You let the market take you out. And it doesn't have to go |
| 1125 | 02:07:39 --> 02:07:44 | down and take this low out. It's just the target. So it removes all of the I |
| 1126 | 02:07:44 --> 02:07:48 | have to be right stuff that everybody thinks that I teach, I don't teach that |
| 1127 | 02:07:48 --> 02:07:55 | you have to be right. Now, admittedly, I'm a little disappointed, because I |
| 1128 | 02:07:55 --> 02:08:02 | absolutely wanted to be in this to show you with with one contract, how the |
| 1129 | 02:08:02 --> 02:08:09 | stock would have been managed. So it's kind of like it's not as good as it |
| 1130 | 02:08:09 --> 02:08:13 | would have been if I would have been in it. So, but I know some of you are out |
| 1131 | 02:08:13 --> 02:08:17 | there taking this, and as much as I don't want you doing it, I gave you |
| 1132 | 02:08:17 --> 02:08:23 | guidance, because I know you probably are doing more than one contract. So not |
| 1133 | 02:08:23 --> 02:08:27 | an easy session. I mean, it's not impossible. Obviously you can see what |
| 1134 | 02:08:27 --> 02:08:31 | we are looking for, and everything outlined is in the video. You'll be able |
| 1135 | 02:08:31 --> 02:08:36 | to listen to it and see it, but framing it where it makes sense, it has to make |
| 1136 | 02:08:36 --> 02:08:41 | sense. Just because prices moving around doesn't mean I have to be in there. |
| 1137 | 02:08:41 --> 02:08:45 | Doesn't mean you have to be in there. But finding a setup, getting in and |
| 1138 | 02:08:45 --> 02:08:50 | getting 20 handles, 2025 handles, something like that. That's a nice |
| 1139 | 02:08:50 --> 02:08:55 | little bread and butter type setup. There's opportunities where you can go |
| 1140 | 02:08:55 --> 02:08:59 | back through price action. The main takeaway today is, is identifying how |
| 1141 | 02:08:59 --> 02:09:06 | price was delivering all this run up to the top of the breaker here. All of this |
| 1142 | 02:09:06 --> 02:09:15 | is all one sided, all of this on the one minute chart that makes it hard to find |
| 1143 | 02:09:15 --> 02:09:21 | an inefficiency in you have to just let it go. And then it'll do this. It'll |
| 1144 | 02:09:21 --> 02:09:25 | give up the ghost, basically, and just boom, you'll see an energetic run. And |
| 1145 | 02:09:25 --> 02:09:31 | then here, big energetic run. I wanted to see this stay open. Now, why would I |
| 1146 | 02:09:31 --> 02:09:36 | would have seen that? Because if this is the low I'm aiming for here, if this |
| 1147 | 02:09:36 --> 02:09:39 | would have stayed open, this would have been a whole lot faster and quicker. |
| 1148 | 02:09:39 --> 02:09:43 | It's still very well may go down there, but it would have been a lot less of |
| 1149 | 02:09:43 --> 02:09:47 | this kind of stuff. It just would have been I fell out of bed there it is done, |
| 1150 | 02:09:47 --> 02:09:55 | and I would have been less inclined to tell you where the stop would have been |
| 1151 | 02:09:55 --> 02:10:00 | dropped, down to here that would have stayed at where it was initially one. It |
| 1152 | 02:10:00 --> 02:10:05 | covered costs. It would, it would have stayed there, and then the run below |
| 1153 | 02:10:05 --> 02:10:09 | this and into new week, opening gap down here, which is still, you know, |
| 1154 | 02:10:10 --> 02:10:15 | something that could potentially pan out. So I did my best with working with |
| 1155 | 02:10:15 --> 02:10:22 | what was given to us today, teaching how to wait for a setup, being very critical |
| 1156 | 02:10:22 --> 02:10:27 | of the framework, the things that I would like to look for. You saw me try |
| 1157 | 02:10:27 --> 02:10:32 | to go in, but it's not it's not my fault that the trading view was doing |
| 1158 | 02:10:32 --> 02:10:35 | maintenance on their paper trading thing. I have to teach in a paper |
| 1159 | 02:10:35 --> 02:10:38 | trading account. I'm a licensed trade advisor. None of these things should be |
| 1160 | 02:10:38 --> 02:10:41 | inspiration for you to go and trade with your real money. I can't control what |
| 1161 | 02:10:41 --> 02:10:46 | you're going to do, but I am asking you, if you follow this and you made money, |
| 1162 | 02:10:46 --> 02:10:50 | please don't tell me. I don't want to know about it. That's not what we're |
| 1163 | 02:10:50 --> 02:10:54 | having here. We're not a signal service. I'm not a signal provider. I'm trying to |
| 1164 | 02:10:54 --> 02:10:58 | teach you how to reprice action, live with logic that I teach on this YouTube |
| 1165 | 02:10:58 --> 02:11:02 | channel. It's up to you to decide whether or not there's any value in |
| 1166 | 02:11:02 --> 02:11:05 | this. I personally would love to have had this information presented to me, |
| 1167 | 02:11:05 --> 02:11:11 | and especially if it's for free, and I'm trying to help my son have all the |
| 1168 | 02:11:11 --> 02:11:17 | advantages and remove as much as I humanly possibly can, as both his dad |
| 1169 | 02:11:17 --> 02:11:21 | and the mentor of the treating side of it, to help him remove the likelihood of |
| 1170 | 02:11:21 --> 02:11:27 | him hurting himself and making his progress as easy as it can be done. But |
| 1171 | 02:11:27 --> 02:11:30 | still, you know, you still going to put the put the effort behind it, and it's |
| 1172 | 02:11:30 --> 02:11:37 | not going to happen real fast. Okay, so hopefully you got something from this. |
| 1173 | 02:11:37 --> 02:11:41 | Admittedly, my obsessively compulsive side is a little flared up right now |
| 1174 | 02:11:41 --> 02:11:46 | because I I don't like the fact that it didn't let me get in it, but at least I |
| 1175 | 02:11:46 --> 02:11:50 | was able to outline it for you. So hopefully that's enough consolation |
| 1176 | 02:11:50 --> 02:11:54 | prize for what we've seen here today. If you learn something from this today, |
| 1177 | 02:11:55 --> 02:12:00 | leave a comment in the community post after this stream closes, I usually go |
| 1178 | 02:12:00 --> 02:12:03 | over to my community post on YouTube channel and I put the date up, and I'll |
| 1179 | 02:12:03 --> 02:12:07 | ask you, what did you learn with this live stream? And it's the date in |
| 1180 | 02:12:07 --> 02:12:11 | today's live stream. If you learned anything, you know, I'd like to know |
| 1181 | 02:12:11 --> 02:12:17 | what helped you. And if you didn't learn anything, I don't care to know that, |
| 1182 | 02:12:17 --> 02:12:22 | because when I see that, I just simply, I block you because that that comment is |
| 1183 | 02:12:22 --> 02:12:26 | just waste the stuff is waste of time. You're wasting time writing it, and I'm |
| 1184 | 02:12:26 --> 02:12:30 | wasting my time leaving you accessible to me. I'm not going to give you my |
| 1185 | 02:12:30 --> 02:12:33 | time. It doesn't mean you can't watch my stuff. It just means that I won't ever |
| 1186 | 02:12:33 --> 02:12:37 | see your comment again. Now on Twitter, everybody is open like you can you can |
| 1187 | 02:12:37 --> 02:12:40 | tell me anything there. If you learn something, tell me what you learned |
| 1188 | 02:12:40 --> 02:12:44 | there. It's more dynamic. If I see something I really like, or felt like I |
| 1189 | 02:12:44 --> 02:12:49 | stuck a nerve in the good side, in a good sense, I might respond to you, but |
| 1190 | 02:12:49 --> 02:12:56 | until I talk to you on Thursday, because tomorrow, again, Wednesday is flmc. I |
| 1191 | 02:12:56 --> 02:13:00 | have a guy that's saying he's going to live stream, so I want to, kind of like |
| 1192 | 02:13:00 --> 02:13:02 | sit in and watch whatever he's he's doing, I don't know. And I'll be |
| 1193 | 02:13:04 --> 02:13:08 | sticking my head in to some of my students live streams and watching |
| 1194 | 02:13:08 --> 02:13:13 | watching them do their thing tomorrow, and I'll be back at it again on |
| 1195 | 02:13:13 --> 02:13:19 | Thursday, Lord willing, right around 920 ish, right before the opening bell. So |
| 1196 | 02:13:19 --> 02:13:21 | until I talk to you, then be safe you. |